User talk:Delfort/archive1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Delfort!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:59, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 7401be88dba0d03066aa23727d109665

[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token 91ea7d5fbbb8b2d492db6b740c4040b0

[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Immagine sospetta

[edit]

Grazoie. Segnalata. Ciao--Trixt (talk) 20:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 6f8a2e5fc9a12db5271e87482a9168f5

[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Fatto, e avvisato l'utente di evitare di riprovarci. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 18:00, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fatto, e avvisato l'uploader. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 15:31, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In effetti è un po' grossa :-) -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 15:47, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

[edit]

Ciao, lì bisogna fare il confronto con l'originale e controllare che quest'ultimo non fosse appunto registrato come marchio. Se è una libera reinterpretazione, come accade per gli stemmi delle città, secondo me dovrebbe essere possibile tenerlo - va solo chiarito che appunto si tratta di una reinterpretazione e non dell'immagine originale. Per il resto, credevo di aver risposto, non me l'ero presa e poi non mi devi niente, è solo più bello non fare tutto da soli. Ciau... --Elitre (talk) 14:00, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

[edit]

Peraltro sembra una figurina Panini. Comunque se guardi la sua talk capisci la situazione... Ciao. --Elitre (talk) 16:22, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Posso occuparmene solo più tardi. Ciau --Elitre (talk) 16:37, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kits

[edit]

Ciao. Dalle discussioni che ho letto in giro non sembra essere ritenuto un problema la presenza dei quasi microscopici loghi sulle maglie, anche se copyrighted. Sono troppo piccoli, pare ricadono nel COM:De minimis. Comunque non ti so dire niente di certo. Per it.wiki dovrebbero valere le stesse regole, visto che sono norme del copyright. La mia personale opinione e' che se sono talmente piccoli da non costituire un problema per il copyright sono anche troppo piccoli per costituire un'informazione grafica valida, e quindi, per logica conseguenza, non sono da mettere.--Trixt (talk) 21:06, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contributi di Giangibbo

[edit]

L'avevo anche avvertito. Alcuni file si possono salvare con i template {{PD-Italia}} e {{PD-1996}}, ma ce ne sono altri che non vanno, e poi anche foto copiate da Google Street View. Per adesso un mese, se continua lo butto fuori. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 22:39, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contributi di ZioMike94

[edit]

In effetti è un copyvioller seriale. Adesso gli ho lasciato un avviso in talk, se ci riprova lo blocco. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 16:29, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 09761fb2949f1643218b9ba345404297

[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 22:14, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stadio sant'Elia

[edit]

✓ Done -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 22:18, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio notices

[edit]

Hi, you can enable the gadget "Quick Delete", this gives you a link in the sidebar for "Report copyright violation". Fill in the reason and it automatically adds the template, and a warning template on the uploader's talk page. This makes sure that the uploader is aware of what's happening to their files. I didn't block Marcoca89 as it didn't appear they had been sufficiently warned. Thanks, –⁠moogsi (blah) 16:19, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyviol

[edit]

Delfort guarda che le immagini le ha rilasciate soccer.ru, che le ha rilasciate con la creative-commons. Se ho sbagliato scusami ma credo di aver usato la licenza corretta. --Sepp.P (talk) 19:00, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Se ti interessa ho caricato anche questo, giusto per segnalartelo --Sepp.P (talk) 19:03, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, ok. Scusami, non lo sapevo. Cancella pure. --Sepp.P (talk) 19:04, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Crop foto

[edit]

Buongiorno Delfort. Gradirei sapere il motivo di tutti i ritagli, sono poco pratico di commons, potresti indicarmi se c'è una regola a tal riguardo o se le tue modifiche sono semplicemente dettate dal "buon senso". Grazie. Saluti, AssassinsCreed (talk) 09:22, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, grazie del chiarimento. Certo che almeno in quelle dove i volti si vedevano solo marginalmente si poteva chiudere un occhio, ma vabbè... Buona giornata, AssassinsCreed (talk) 09:31, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Certo, ho capito, ci mancherebbe. Non voleva essere una critica. Buon lavoro, AssassinsCreed (talk) 09:39, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Massimo Cherubini (giornalista) - immagine

[edit]

Ciao Delfort, ho visto che hai eliminato l'immagine di Massimo Cherubini (giornalista). Ho seguito le procedure previste per il rilascio dei diritti d'autore, da alcune settimane sono in attesa di ricevere il codice OTRS dal team di permissions-it@wikimedia.org per effettuare l'upload dell'immagine. Puoi indicarmi in cosa ho sbagliato e quale procedura seguire? Grazie anticipatamente per l'aiuto (è la prima volta che provo a caricare un'immagine!)

--Ippocrate80 (talk) 13:34, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Delfort, ho inviato una email direttamente a Massimo Cherubini che ha confermato di essere proprietario dell'immagine compilando l'apposito form indicato da Wikipedia. Successivamente ho inviato l'email di conferma a permissions-it@wikimedia.org insieme con il link all'immagine inserita su wiki commons... ho sbagliato in qualcosa? Scusa il disturbo e grazie per i consigli! --Ippocrate80 (talk) 14:57, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 09:59, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cancellazioni

[edit]

Non ti ho ignorato, semplicemente non ho avuto tempo :-) -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 08:34, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Allora, le tre foto provengono dalla stessa camera. *Almeno* quelle posso presumere, dal momento che non ho trovato riscontri altrove, che siano effettivamente sue. In genere intervengo quando trovo fotografie a risoluzioni web, senza dati exif e delle quali l'utente non spiega la provenienza in maniera convincente. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 08:43, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Se pubblica qualcosa con altro EXIF allora scatta l'allarme. Tu tienilo d'occhio. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 09:26, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

[edit]
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

[edit]
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Delfort,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the speedy deletion tag you placed as we don't enforce trademarks on Commons. If you think the logo doesn't meet the Threshold of originality, you can file a request for deletion here. Thank you. Techman224Talk 22:21, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Magic statue - Staples Center.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

INeverCry 23:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chuck Taylor 1921.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

74.111.48.100 10:40, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

copyviol

[edit]

non ho capito dove sono i numerosi watermark, non li vedo. Da dove sarebbe copiato mi mandi un link?--Pierpao.lo (listening) 09:04, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie ma tecnicamente come fai a controllare le foto di google maps? Io avevo cercato con ricerca immagini di google ma mi aveva dato solo wikipedia e commons. O te ne sei accorto dai watermark?--Pierpao.lo (listening) 14:40, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyviol

[edit]
  1. questo File:Michael Wainwright.JPG qui [1]
  2. File:Michael_Sullivan_Lord_Mayor.jpg qui [https://www.google.it/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZit6E9cZ72sIUQ9QRpO5Mf52uRg9vzMn16bp7xp-MtNDNe5tZvA9rGLwD_154TncjONjYxJUO0Lqn0rYa55F4Kpy4X-zuSIcS5gpgL4ElReO7IqHFlLOk304SREduK5iHrQVJznU5S09QmXtj11SN_1GUZdgNntpXK6L6FMIRuYO-Dkce7e4EUjb635s7U4V-TvkA9PN15WWvfuVK5jooAbOvF4xgBfNGqAiBdAeWShY0cWHVMaMca1xFLZJBiUbjxIYDL0g-8oQ399PZayMM8KJ_1B4oHplHL4-u12Wd_10DCn2pJ1Zka5kiR0Hg4bUKvIcqwm5FO8txWvrB9voXDe-_1N9Pxtb2kqPIGFoa_1-0YzF70vgNWMCagI3WKDit53gz_18Y2Ivo5ly1De60GSW-n1mwmGtMuRMN8vdVLYj3qPpCLye-yncMzk5pWyGmCVlLyP3-S7Z2c4EzfLSnr944O_1qF0swpIEYE0hztrl5mik-

frQIyRRHGNk1KDfT4bqjMEhzs0me07Cqca8odRugrp8KZt560w62wFJEOyGcjZO_1SKVeVCi0gm3yAQIt9fjt2cOQU_1Rpy5cjVpypD_1APa8SSR3m1IMzS2_1n8G0bv_1V7YKylwsEfpo_1Pij6c6cPEdFVjxwEkdAhdMDOQkw8-RpP6QK-3l7ppYV2lZtF_1dAiM-zx22s_1kWX0ooYoz0-c6F2rF9G1oHPUIT3sN6pDl93N2LYuX8Ie8V7WpmHaeF_1dRFGfnBpcwFQAbtUEqaJYZAkzJXNYiaTnqGhIjMVn-sNtLXCUdjhjWd0TbV-WuPnfV-DjtwlfQSar1Cl8KRTSyTLSFNTXgxf9dFXNoCvl54c3DCBwZuUxWC8-jsWaJnJ-SXky-6Y7UZdJv34FrXut4Lci4OeTa59YrTz-zuYKcbbNQl9VhGDmER52ADbghV4EbudcWd2QgSY2mNTT3Wk9JlGgZ7Q7RWFDIemD7ScnhiEm0FgdBOrl9dOZhHzC18LJGH8XBBZJrLDuZ_1yDgH-6WjKXKBPZ-DQ3OqzJ8iFPt0debatuaxewmqhXBTzJT_1NKTjDs3tCml-P1m0tBaHNwyd86GWN9HHI3OrkMxU7nesK8gTt_157r6t4xPkKPjfF4Bjzmce0D6j3317a7SoqwV-M5wjWezRrASwHMnBhKSMA5LmjcvKkMhRxfU_1Ixvq8yQsbdLLilSzrmhiavVHpFPbnOfxv88TwRm2Q7TnFa30ZWbdjdp-syb-GLZWwnHPKi6bfUImjKPOzEHkaIMzwx1Xwh9bAVeEHOkMTP9ekxKAiGj2suR8GDt8CjdNauQyoXh3TZSrlKiTDI5JVp5RCsskEL9I0QII2mpcP6hSj3Sy9Yp5BmhBt7H2q_1rL9hM9_17n1Nz4RcWZLIwsQeru02aNWNEiA8wOG4YI9f9fMnghlfyhrgN-N37Jqe2SuxTmgzhZGClhTxMbwljrxAeUNip2jUhdgkbywmWIeJcTu-OaHzypWZPzTgODkfdMDffZZ774Tiwfi4Oj6PXxbqFGBF1dfD88VKiQ71UdwgL5S9Tag6-nmg41ozypyZoevEk3ChwERJGUW1fc46dY004Y6sGw7tGxjQy0-HkVQiSAH4cH-18T93L5NEPPLrmcpmTjQKxEiVI4pQjK9UJAokmy-PRkA7_1iKDJ8Sid_1B]

  1. File:Michael_Simon.JPG qui [2]
    sembrerebbero copyviol. Il primo ha la data successiva a quella di un sito. L'ultimo al contrario ha dimensioni più grande ma è sfocato. Al di la dei casi specifici in questi casi come si fa a capire chi ha copiato chi se non ci sono le date? Ci sono trucchi? Perchè ne trovo tantissimi tra le immagini non categorizzate. Che si fa cancellazione ordinaria o immediata? grazie-Pierpao.lo (listening) 18:52, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CopyViol FIGC ITALIA-2006.svg e File:FIGC ITALIA-1992.svg

[edit]

Ciao Delfort, di recente mi sono stati cancellati due stemmi della FIGC. Li avevo ricostruiti in vettoriale in quanto richiesti sul Laboratorio Immagini da Vettorializzare ( c'è da dire che già esistevano in formato png, non ci sono più neanche quelli). Per mia ignoranza mi sono attribuito la paternità dei suddetti. Io ho una buona conoscenza di grafica ma per quello che riguarda i copyrigh, no purtroppo. Qualora volessi reinserire in maniera corretta i due Loghi della FIGC come devo fare? come posso risalire alle giuste licenze d'uso? MA SOPRATUTTO QUESTE SEGNALAZIONI COMPORTANO UN ALLONTANAMENTO DALLA PIATTAFORMA DI WIKI? Grazie dell'attenzione. MacMoreno (talk) 14:00, 21 December 2017 (UTC) ___________________________[reply]

Ari-ciao Delfort, sono andato a vedere sul sito di EUIPO (Ufficio dell'Unione Europea per la Propietà Intellettuale) esistono i loghi FIGC del 2016 e 2017 e hanno una registrazione con il numero del marchio, mentre per quanto riguarda i loghi FIGC-1992 e FIGC-2006 non esistono più e non hanno una registrazione ne un numero del marchio. Posso Quindi... reinserirli?.MacMoreno (talk) 18:07, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Coppagermania.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:47, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was not the author, just cropped the images. Delfort (talk) 06:40, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:2011 November Nine.jpg

[edit]

{{Autotranslate|1=File:2011 November Nine.jpg|base=Image source}} [[User:Chiyako92|Chiyako92]] ([[User talk:Chiyako92|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 14:23, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

@Chiyako92: credo che questo avviso sia stato apposto per errore. Ciao, Delfort (talk) 06:39, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Rimosso. Era arrivato perché inizialmente il file non aveva passato il controllo della licenza, ma ora è a posto. --Chiyako92 (talk) 14:32, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UPLOAD THE LIGHT RED COLOR OF THE LINE WITH HIGHER RESOLUTION PLEASE

[edit]

File:Kit body red black vertical.png Please upload the file with a higher resolution and LIGHT RED, thank you ZanioloDiego (talk) 02:43, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, SCP-2000 11:01, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Flag of Reggio Calabria.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 20:31, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Reggio Calabria Stemma.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 20:32, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Reggio Calabria.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 09:22, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]