User talk:DAJF/archive

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image:205-3002 Musashi-Takahagi 20040605.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Sz-iwbot) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 07:32, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, DAJF!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:46, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Your Shinkansen photo

Dear DAJF,

I thought you might like to know that I've used one of your photos on my website:

http://www.unmissablejapan.com/etcetera/trains

I've acknowledged it by making it link back to the original page on Flickr.

It's a great photo - thanks very much for making it available under creative commons,

cheers,

Mike

Thanks for letting me know, but please note that you need to actually attribute individual images on your page - as they are not public domain. It becomes especially problematic when you tag your page as "Copyright - All rights reserved". See the Creative Commons page for details. Thanks. --DAJF (talk) 07:36, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Sento-Kun-Dinakarr-Jan2010.jpg

File:Sento-Kun-Dinakarr-Jan2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Takabeg (talk) 14:34, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Shino Watabe fotos

sorry! I forgot to put the {{otrspending}} template on the two artworks by Shino Watabe. I did send the letter from her today. Both the photos and the artworks in them are hersAlejandroLinaresGarcia (talk) 15:23, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

OK, that's a good step, but please don't remove the deletion notices until the permission has been properly confirmed. --DAJF (talk) 23:31, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Tamayodo Station 20121102.JPG

Pay attention to copyright
File:Tamayodo Station 20121102.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Deleted because of improper transfer, neither the required upload history from ja wiki was copied, also only 50% of the license were copied (original is multi-licensed). This is in fact a copyright violation. And I'm not even talking about your failure to mark the original image at ja wiki as available at Commons.Denniss (talk) 10:36, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

OK, thanks for the note. Apologies if I got the licensing wrong along the way, although as the image in question was deleted before I got a chance to see this, it's a bit difficult for me to see exactly what the problem was. As I will no doubt be wanting to transfer other image files from Japanese Wikipedia to Commons in the future, I can't help thinking that a bit of guidance on precisely what licensing format I should have used would perhaps have been more helpful. --DAJF (talk) 13:55, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Yu Takahashi in a radio station in 2012.jpg

Good day! I try to search for the author of this file.Unfortunately,this person was no longer active on Flickr and it was confirmed one day after this file has been made.But,I'm sorry to say that I'm not related on this issue.I noticed that my account had been used by others that is why I changed my password.I have been request not to block my account.I will do this action as soon as possible. I hope you will appreciate my explainations regarding this situation. Thank You! RenRen070193 13:14, 24 January 2013 (UTC)RenRen070193RenRen070193 13:14, 24 January 2013 (UTC) 13:13, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

That's OK. You are not at fault here, as the Flickr image was tagged with a Commons-compatible license. The problem was that the Flickr user did not actually have permission to upload what was a copyright image. --DAJF (talk) 09:23, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Tokyo metro icons' colors

Hello! We’re trying to merge the BSicon sets into only a few separate color icon sets — see discussion here. You created back in 2008 the 13 Tokyo metro lines’ icons, and we’d like your input concerning the acceptability of a slight change in the RGB values used. See for one the discussion about Marunouchi. Thank you! -- Tuválkin ✉ 21:32, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Are you trying to simplify and reduce the number of different colour variations used? In the case of Tokyo subway icons, I don't think the exact shades are officially specified (trains and signs seem to use quite a few different shades), so I don't think it is too critical. A basic "Red" is fine for the Marunouchi Line colour. The Fukutoshin Line colour is most closely represented by "Sienna", but I suppose any similar brown could be used. --DAJF (talk) 08:59, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply, it was a great help. Keep up the good work, too — your upload gallery is awsome! -- Tuválkin ✉ 10:23, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello again! We’re wrapping up the revamping of the “usual-color” BSicons and so far it was decided to keep one of the Tokyo color unchanged and all other with slight changes, as we talked above — of those 4 icons are still to be decided their exact new RGB. The remaining question is whether these icons need to be kept named as they are: Once integrated in the newly organized color sets they will be renamed as "lDST_color", but the current names can be kept as exceptional permanent redirects to those. We’d appreciate your input. This discussion is at Talk:BSicon/Colors#Tokyo. Thank you! -- Tuválkin ✉ 00:25, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Kawagoe Station west exit forecourt artists impression.jpg

File:Kawagoe Station west exit forecourt artists impression.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

FASTILY (TALK) 01:32, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

画像の置き換えについて

ご指摘の画像再アップは日付の違うものはNGと言われる件ですが、それに関して私自身も今後の画像投稿の参考にしたいと考えております。よって、NGとされる根拠、ならびにウィキペディアのルールを提示して頂くと助かります。その点をお手数ですがお願い致します。--Oka21000 (talk) 16:00, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

追記
ガイドラインを英語で示されているようですが、当方、英語を理解することができません。お手数ですが、要点だけで結構ですから翻訳をして頂けると助かります。

こんにちは（おはようございます）。画像の置き換えについてのガイドラインはCommons:Overwriting existing filesにありますが、確かに英語版しかないみたいですね。こちらの下手な日本語で申し訳ないですが、要点を簡単に訳しますと、同じファイル名での再アップ（置き換え）がＯＫなのは、同じ画像を修正した場合（画質、サイズ、トリミング、傾き、色修正など）だけです。　それ以外との場合は、同じファイル名で置き換えるのはＮＧで、別のファイル名でアップロードしなければなりません。　その理由は、コモンズにアップされる画像は、世界中のウィキペディアの記事で使われますので、コモンズでの画像の内容を勝手に変えることが禁じられています。それで、ファイル名に「Ａ」とか「Ｂ」じゃなくて「Kintetsu 50000 20130508」のように、日付を入れるとわかりやすいし管理しやすいと思います。でも、それはガイドラインではなく、ファイル名については自由です（常識の範囲内）。これで説明になりましたでしょうか。また不明な点がありましたら、いつでも聞いてください。　英語版のウィキペディアで、Oka21000さんの素晴らしい画像を多く使わせていただいていますので、今後もよろしくお願いします。　--DAJF (talk) 00:15, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
御苦労をおかけしまして大変恐縮です。内容はよく呑み込めました。ご丁寧な解説に感謝致します。今後とも、何か当方の問題点がございましたら何なりとおっしゃって下さい。この度は有難うございました。--Oka21000 (talk) 09:26, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Yu Takahashi

Good day!I apologized my mistake about that photo.The problem is the author's right to put the license on Flickr.If you want to know the information about this,please read this at http://www.flickr.com/photos/88579215@N08/8404173325/. I hope you appreciate my apology and I promise to do this action as soon as possible.Thank you! Chantaru (talk) 10:36, 08 June @013 (UTC)

英語の文法の御指摘について

いつも貴重なご助言ありがとうございます。また、桜田門駅のホーム写真の説明についても英語説明を追加していただき、ありがとうございました。--掬茶 (talk) 07:22, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

どういたしまして。その写真をさっそく、en:Sakuradamon Stationの記事に使わせていただきました。 --DAJF (talk) 15:53, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you

You saved one of my files from deletion. I really appreciate that. Yasu (talk) 16:16, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

No problem. Glad to help! --DAJF (talk) 00:21, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

Touch! Generations sound track SVG

I create this SVG file.— Preceding unsigned comment added by YoshiNoirMC (talk • contribs) 00:39, 25 January 2014 (UTC) (UTC)

It Looks like a copyright album cover to me, so unless you can prove that you are the original creator, uploading it to Commons is a copyright violation. Please read Commons:Copyright rules to fully familiarize yourself with the rules, as if you repeatedly upload copyright material, you may find yourself blocked from editing. --DAJF (talk) 01:50, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

QIC discussions

Hi, when you were the original decliner, you do not need to add further  Oppose statements at discussion - your original statement is enough. Might I in future suggest you add  Oppose to your original statement, if you do not believe it was clear enough, and prefix any further comments either by indented reply or with  Comment? That way it makes vote counting easier for whoever closes it. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:11, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

OK, that's probably a clearer way to do it in future. --DAJF (talk) 14:01, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Hello! I quite agree that it is necessary to make adjustments to my File:Сип белоголовый.jpg Tell me how to properly do? I should upload the new one with the desired changes? Sincerely, Жанетта Багаджиян (User:Zhanett.b) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zhanett.b (talk • contribs) 11:05, 28 February 2014 (UTC) (UTC)

Hi. The top and right-hand side of the image have white borders, which need to be trimmed. Do you have Photoshop or other similar photo retouching software? Even if you don't have any special software, if you are using Windows, you can trim images easily using the built-in photo viewing software. But if you are having problems, I can easily trim it for you and upload the corrected version. --DAJF (talk) 12:32, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:205kei train in JR Nikko line 02.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:205kei train in JR Nikko line 02.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Thanks for participating! I apologize for the inconvenience, how to evaluate the work that I like on Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list . Tried but I'm doing something wrong. Sincerely,--Жанетта Багаджиян (talk) 14:50, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Shizuka Itō.JPG

日本鬼子！我就是此圖像的拍攝者，你有意見嗎？--巴哈姆特電玩資訊站 (talk) 14:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't read Chinese, but if you wish to contest the speedy deletion, please comment on the image's talk page, as per the instructions. Thanks. --DAJF (talk) 14:53, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

User talk:巴哈姆特電玩資訊站

re the change to the zh version of the template, sure it translates automatically if you click on the right buttons, but if someone not going to look for the right buttons to press then the entire thing becomes a bit meaningless, which is why I often change the welcome template to the appropriate language for users who seem to have difficulty getting the point, like this one.

In this case it was actually done with the intention of also giving him a warning for being rude to you, and using uncivil language, in his comment above. I'm sure you realise this, because if you read the hanzi as kanji they mean the same thing (ja:日本鬼子). There really is no place on Commons for going this type of language, however if he's insistent that he can't read English then it would have had to be done in Chinese. However writing in Chinese on my English keypad is a real pain and I was going to take the time today to do it. Does this better explain my reasoning to you?--KTo288 (talk) 14:03, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for taking the time to write back. Your reasoning does make sense, although the individual language versions of translated message templates do indicate that they are not supposed to be used directly. But thanks for stepping in to give the user a reprimand. I had actually figured out what the Chinese comment meant, thanks to Google Translate, and just found it rather amusing since I'm not even Japanese. --DAJF (talk) 14:39, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

No need for thanks for the warning, would do the same for anyone in the same circumstances. He made the same mistake I made from assumming that you're Japanese, from your edit history and userpage, but whether you are Japanese or not there is no reason for anyone to address someone with a racial slur.--KTo288 (talk) 06:05, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Kita-Asaka Station North Entrance 20120910.JPG

File:Kita-Asaka Station North Entrance 20120910.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JuTa 19:08, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Ryo Kawasaki -2014.jpg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZkH06Zfq6w&index=7&list=UUVOf22gPWLXrOGg-Loalrqg

is under Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed) ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by User1x!23: (talk • contribs) 01:31, 11 February 2015‎ (UTC (UTC)

Thanks for changing the license. In that case, I can probably withdrawn the deletion request. Also, I wonder if you could find a better screen grab of the artist without his eyes closed? --DAJF (talk) 03:34, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Mr.Kawasaki always closes his eyes while performing since he's in some form of trans while performing and he has no need to see anything while playing music :) And you're also free to upload any screen capture from this vid to add your photo of preference for Mr.Kawasaki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by User1x!23: (talk • contribs) 04:39, 11 February 2015‎ (UTC (UTC)
OK, thanks. Please try to remember to sign your comments in future. --DAJF (talk) 04:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
【TiCA15】《進擊的巨人》阿爾敏聲優簽名會 井上麻里奈雀躍分享配音心得《Attack on Titan Season 2》 - 巴哈姆特
【TiCA15】《Fate/stay night》遠坂凜聲優植田佳奈簽名會 現場嶄露傲嬌橋段《Fate/stay night [Unlimited Blade Works》 - 巴哈姆特]
【TpGS 15】萬代南夢宮邀請日本知名偶像「板野友美」於攤位與粉絲互動 - 巴哈姆特

--世良田二郎三郎 (talk) 14:19, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Are you saying these are blatant copyright violations? It does look like the case, so I'll nominate them for deletion. --DAJF (talk) 14:30, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

File:E501 K752 in Mito Line.jpg

File:E501 K752 in Mito Line.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JobanLineE531 (talk) 08:47, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Yong Jun-hyung.jpg

Hello. Please look at the source page. If you open it, at the bottom after the pictures on the right hand side there is a CC icon of a person standing ina circle. If you click on it, it takes you to the creative commons website with the license description in English. The photos are under CC-by. --Teemeah (talk) 11:52, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for replying. You are right about the Creative Commons license. I missed it because it was so small, but my mistake. Sorry! In future when uploading images from external websites, you need to add the {{LicenseReview}} template after the license so that an admin or reviewer can review and confirm that the license is correct. This is necessary because it then confirms that the image was published under a free license at the time it was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, which cannot later be revoked even if the website owner subsequently decides to change the license to a non-free license. In other words, it safeguards the image uploaded to Commons. Anyway, I've added the template to the Yong Jun-hyung image, so you can see how it works. It usually takes a couple of days for a reviewer to check it. --DAJF (talk) 12:34, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Guillaume Bottazzi's artworkTokyo.jpg

@INeverCry: Hello, I'm not an expert about it, but if the uploader is the author of the photograph and allows reusing and sharing his file, is there any problem with the japanese laws ? Because it's the case with this file... Otourly (talk) 16:22, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

If the uploader is indeed the creator of the artwork, that would take care of the FoP issue. Is he also the person who photographed it? I would suggest he contact OTRS so a formal permission ticket can be made which would help to avoid any further confusion or deletions. I don't oppose restoration of the image if everything is found to be in order. INeverCry 20:09, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

File:明神会20周年記念誌 外見.jpg

お手数かけます。作成者から使用許可は取り付けているのですが、二次利用を考慮すると、やはり差し替えたほうが良いかなと思ってます。--Kaztima109 12:14, 20 May 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaztima109 (talk • contribs) 12:14, 20 May 2015 (UTC) (UTC)

こんにちは。アップロードした画像がご本人自身が撮った物ではない場合、画像の作者本人からの許諾文書の写しを permissions-commons@wikimedia.org へ転送する必要になります。 --DAJF (talk) 13:13, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
お世話になります。具体的な必要事項を教えていただきありがとうございます。本当にウィキペディアン・メディアンが皆こうなら良いと思います。（W杯の頃に別アカで少し編集してたことがあるんですが、自分じゃ記事を書いてないくせに、急に入って来て他人のミスをあら捜し・揚げ足取りする奴が多くて、頭来てヤメた経緯があります(^_^;)）　明日、先方に聞いてみます。 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaztima109 (talk • contribs) 15:16, 20 May 2015 (UTC) (UTC)

File:松原神社本社神輿コース表ウェブ版.jpg

お世話になっております。表題の件ですが、これは私が明神會に依頼されて作成した物です。＝私自身の作品です。

twitter 2015年04月25日(土)　https://twitter.com/kaztima/status/591922765722046464 小田原宿総鎮守「松原神社」の本社神輿のルートMAPです。 平成27年北條五代祭り・例大祭用。 氏子町会では神輿、山車の担ぎ手、曳き手を募集している所があります。 http://p.twipple.jp/EVi10

作成画面

投稿者自身の作成であることの証明

画面中の記念誌につきましては、先方と連絡が取れましたが「なんだかめんどくさそうだね」って事なので、スキャンではなく、現物を広げている写真に差し替えます。二次利用を心配されてるので、「それなら平気でしょ」との話しは取り付けてあります。　--Kaztima109 05:29, 26 May 2015 (UTC)　— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaztima109 (talk • contribs) 05:29, 26 May 2015 (UTC) (UTC)

そうですか。「作成・発行：　松原神社」と書いてあるようですので、お手数ですが、上にも書いたように正式に許諾文書の写しを permissions-commons@wikimedia.org へ転送する必要になります。　今回の削除依頼の期間である25日から7日間以内であれば間に合うはずです。
また、再度のお願いですが、今後「~~~~」を使ってコメントの後に署名を必ず記入してください。 --DAJF (talk) 07:17, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Image deletion discussion

You've stopped responding to the discussion, I would respect a response about how you are trying to delete my image over policy guidelines versus laws of Commons and all that I wrote on that page. Cheers, Nesnad (talk) 02:56, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi. If this is about the ongoing deletion request at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Currentschooluniformstylesintokyo-jan292015.jpg, I didn't think there was much more I could add to the discussion that hasn't already been said. I nominated the file, stating that I felt it fell foul of the privacy guidelines, as the person's face was (and still is) clearly recognizable. You responded, stating that you felt there was no problem with it. I remain unconvinced, and as our interpretations of the guidelines appear to differ, my view is that it's best just to leave it to other editors or admins to determine whether or not the image should be kept or deleted. --DAJF (talk) 13:58, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Hey hey. But there is a lot to respond to! As I said over there (where you can respond if you wish): They are guidelines, not laws of Commons. To respect Japanese Wikipedia it is considered good manners to blur out faces of private people in public. But it is not required, as can be seen in the same category that this image exists in. Click it. There are billions of Japanese school students without blurred faces in that category and in other parts of Wikimedia Commons. It is not a requirement on Wikimedia to blur the faces of private people in Japan, it is just good manners. And I did blur the face in this case. So you essentially nominated a perfectly valid file on the base of a guideline not a law. That seems irrational and unfair. Also you told me to to let you know if I think any of your pictures need work, but didn't offer me the same courtesy and instead just want to delete mine? I would like to hear your thinking on this too? Cheers, Nesnad (talk) 04:26, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Okay, so if, instead of nominating the image for deletion, I had just sent you a friendly message pointing out my concerns, what would you have done? --DAJF (talk) 13:12, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Well we aren't on that road are we? I still think it is blurred enough, but after discussion about that with you if I understood your concerns I might have blurred it more, because the whole reason I blur at all is out of "good manners" anyway. (Which confuses me about your blurring faces but not license plates thing? You do realize both are considered good manners on Japanese Wikipedia, right?) I still think you should retract your deletion request, but hopefully some level-headed admin comes along soon and closes it soon. Cheers, Nesnad (talk) 02:39, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
It was a genuine question, as you indicated above that you were curious as to why I had nominated the image for deletion without contacting you first. I hoped that the deletion nomination would spur you to fully blur out the face, and while time is running out, there is still time to fix it and thus nullify the deletion request. (If, as I was, you are not familiar with the procedure, you need to contact an admin personally to request deletion of the old revision, but it's a quick and easy process.) But if you feel that the image is OK as it stands, that's fair enough, and I'm happy to let an admin or someone more knowledgeable on such matters make the final decision. And as for what is considered good manners on Japanese Wikipedia, I don't upload images there, so I am not familiar enough with the rules and guidelines that apply there to be able to comment. This discussion is about an image uploaded on Wikimedia Commons and the official guidelines that apply to images uploaded to Commons. --DAJF (talk) 05:48, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Hey hey. Still confused. If you thought you wanted it more blurred why is trying to delete it more effective than just leave a message on my talk page? Did you assume I would say no? And if so, why? Also do you realize guideline rules are different than laws of Commons? It says, and I quote: It illustrates standards or behaviors which most editors agree with in principle and generally follow. Why do you think that "agree with in principle" and also "generally follow" is the same as must be deleted? I am honestly confused about what is going on in your thinking. I'm honestly confused. All I can think is that you are being stubborn? I don't know. I don't mean that as an attack on you as person, of course, I just mean I'm trying to understand your actions. And if you honestly think that all Japanese photos can't show faces why try to delete photos that at least attempted to blur when many more don't even try that? I'm just confused. Cheers, Nesnad (talk) 17:14, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi. In answer to your latest questions... I didn't bother contacting you about my concerns about the image because the last time I tried to offer advice about project guidelines (over on English Wikipedia), I was given the impression that you preferred to do things your own way and didn't appreciate outside interference. My interpretation is that official guidelines should normally be adhered to, and that this particular image crosses the line of acceptability - which is why I flagged it for deletion. I don't believe I have said anywhere that I think all faces should automatically be blurred out in Japanese pictures, and don't see any problem with the vast majority that we see on Commons, in which people are just incidental passers-by in the background. The difference I see here is that the girl in question is the main subject of this image, not just someone who happened to be in the background, and while I understand you made an attempt to blur out her face slightly, I don't think it was sufficient, as the person is still clearly identifiable. This is all stuff I wrote in the original deletion nomination, so we appear to be going round in circles here. --DAJF (talk) 10:32, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
You've just admitted it is a vendetta against me. You said earlier that it wasn't because you didn't look at the user name but only the picture. Now you are saying you didn't contact me because you thought I wouldn't respond to you. So you are conducting a vendetta against me and I find that disappointing and discouraging. Nesnad (talk) 11:17, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Actually it was a just a regular deletion nomination, no different from any others I start on an almost daily basis whenever I see problematic images on Commons. I'm not interested in starting vendettas with you or anyone. --DAJF (talk) 01:01, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

画像転載のお礼

京浜にけと申します。ご無沙汰しております。私は英語が苦手なのでお忙しい中恐縮ですが日本語で失礼します。

画像Kamifukuoka Eki Ekisya 1936 1.jpgをコモンズに転載して頂きありがとうございました。 当ファイルにつきましては作者は不明（無名の著作物）であって私ではないつまり転載元のFileページの作者（Author）の欄が「京浜にけ」ではないので、英語版を初め、他言語版に資すると判断されたならばコモンズに重複アップロードして頂いて構いません。なお、作者の欄が空白だったため「不明」であることを記載しました。こちらも後に修正して頂きありがとうございました。この様な著作権が満了した作者が不明のファイルは東武東上本線（英語版）関連で他にも多数投稿しましたので、これらについてもご自由にコモンズに転載しても構いません。転載が確認されましたらこちらでウィキペディア側のファイルをja:WP:CSD#全般8で削除いたします。英語が苦手な私は、コモンズでのアップロードは難しい所がありますが、FOPなど改善が進んでいることを実感していることから、近い日に参画するかもしれません。

あと、質問ですが、以前「Nowcommons」というテンプレートを転載元（ウィキペディア側のファイル）に残すというCommons側の義務について話されましたが[1]、今後の参考にしたいと思い、そのことについてコモンズの方針文書を調べたのですが、英語が分らないため、どこに書かれているのか分りませんでしたので、簡潔で良いので書かれている場所を教えていただけないでしょうか。ウィキペディアのFileページで「Nowcommons」のテンプレートを除去したところ問題が発生したので[2]質問しました。お忙しい中申し訳ありませんがよろしくお願い申し上げます。--Kh2K 11:19, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

こんにちは。ご無沙汰です。先日、京浜さんが以前にウィキペディア日本語版にアップロードした上福岡駅舎の著作権が満了した写真をコモンズに転載させていただきました。いつも通り、「NowCommons」のテンプレートを転載元のファイルに残しましたが、存続や削除など、ウィキペディア日本語版での対応はお任せします。今後も、京浜さんがアップした埼玉県中心の歴史的な画像を他にもコモンズに転載することもあると思いますが、よろしくお願いします。
また、「NowCommons」のテンプレートの使い方について、コモンズ側としては「Commons:Moving to Commons」の（英語での）説明の中に「転載元のファイルに{{NowCommons}}を貼るのを忘れないで。」みたいな簡単な注意書き程度がありますが、以前にコモンズの管理者により、「元のファイルに貼っておかないとコモンズ側で削除対象となりますよ」みたいな厳しいことを昔言われたことがあって、本当に「義務付け」かどうかは、現在まではっきりしていませんが、その苦い経験以来、トラブルを避けるために必ず貼っておいています。ただ、ウィキペディア日本語版での決まりについて、あまり詳しくありませんので、元ファイルに貼った後の対応は日本語版での編集者たちに完全にお任せしています。　コモンズと各自のウィキペディアでの決まりや習慣が微妙に違う場合が多いみたいで、確かにわかりにくいですね。　今後もよろしくお願いします。　--DAJF (talk) 01:54, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
DAJF様、お忙しい中流暢で違和感のない日本語での適確な回答に感謝申し上げます。ウィキペディアおよびコモンズにおいての今後の参考になりました。有り難う御座いました。--Kh2K 16:20, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

My ones

Hi, I am not so experienced at Wiki Commons. What do I need to do regardless those image? How could I source them? Cheers. --115ash (talk) 11:19, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Done. Now it's clear. --115ash (talk) 11:47, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Why are you behaving this way?

Taking my uploads list and posting deletion templates on dozens of photos, while you can obviously see that I'm not a newcomer to this site, and loaded thousands of photos over the years, all with good and verified license is not an honest behavior. If you have doubts about so many of my recent uploads, a single note on my talk page would have clarified the issue. Causing me the need to reply to more than 40 separate requests look more like a behavior of a troll than somebody who really wants to monitor activity here. In reality, all the photos that you have decorated with templates were released with the specified licence and OTRS request were sent minutes after they were uploaded. Oyoyoy (talk) 02:59, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi. The images I tagged were clearly marked as copyright with no indication of permission for them to be uploaded with a free license - hence they were applicable for speedy deletion as blatant copyright violations. If the copyright holder has sent permission to Commons by email, you should tag the respective image pages with {{subst:OP}}. That will provide time (usually a week or so) for permission to be verified and prevent images you have uploaded from being speedy-deleted. You might want to read through the instructions at Commons:OTRS to save yourself more hassle in future. --DAJF (talk) 03:10, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Going and posting deletion templates on dozens of photos instead of a simple note on my talk page, is simply not smart. Even if you think that a notice is missing. Oyoyoy (talk) 03:36, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Admin?

Hey man. Are you interested to become an administrator on Commons? I see that you are involved in administrative areas (tagging copyvios, filing DRs etc) and I think giving you the tools would be beneficial for the project. I can nominate you if you want to. Thanks! Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:13, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for the offer and suggestion. I don't think I'm ready to be looking at becoming an admin just yet, but maybe that is something to consider a bit further down the line. But thanks anyway. --DAJF (talk) 22:09, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
No problem. If you feel that you are ready, feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Thanks! Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:23, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Discussion on deletion of Jackson61.jpg

Hi I was told to respond to this issue since I uploaded this image. I have the permission from the author of this photograph to use this image. Since this was the first time I uploaded an image to wikicommons, I had a hard time picking the right license; especially that this image was published in China. I thought I included the right license but my picture was still subjected to deletion. Could you let me know what license should I use? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yids Cong (talk • contribs) 20:10, 23 July 2015‎ (UTC) (UTC)

Hi. I can really only repeat what you have already been told when you asked the same question at Commons:Upload help#Correct license for uploading an image. Did you not read that answer?
Basically, if the photo is not your own, you need to provide verifiable proof of permission from the original photographer. See Commons:Permission for the procedure you need to follow. --DAJF (talk) 23:25, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Nagano 2000 Yudanaka 20060531.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Nagano 2000 Yudanaka 20060531.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:01, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

@Ellin Beltz: Hi. I've already requested undeletion of the image here, but if, as an admin, you are able to inspect the file after it was deleted, I would ask that you have another look at it and consider restoring the image. If my memory serves me correctly, the file I uploaded was this file which I transferred from Japanese Wikipedia. While certainly very similar to the image on the blog site you claimed was the original source, and taken at the same location, it should be apparent that they are not actually the same image. For example, the position and colour of the banner immediately to the left of the train is different, and the train destination blinds are different (red lettering versus black lettering). More importantly, the photo I uploaded to Commons was taken and first published in 2006 whereas the blog image was apparently published in 2008.
I would therefore be grateful if you could recheck the deleted image and restore it once you have confirmed that it is not actually a copyright violation. Thanks. --DAJF (talk) 04:59, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Heya, see the undel. Next time give me an hour to look at it and you won't have to waste your time typing two times! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. I have now added all the details of the original source and uploader etc to the image. That was a slip-up on my part for not including them in the first place. --DAJF (talk) 23:14, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Reply

I understand. I'll try.--Wae35244(Talk/History) 09:38, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Unfortunately, the image(File:Shinkansen 200 series in Omiya.jpg) display - was modified ban Pictures - non-profit. So, it does not matter even if it is deleted.--Wae35244(Talk/History) 10:05, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
If you are saying that the original image had a Commons-compatible license at the time you uploaded it to Commons, what you should have done was to add the {{LicenseReview}} tag to the description. The license would then be checked and confirmed by an admin or reviewer, so even if the original Photozou license subsequently changed, the image uploaded to Commons would be safe-guarded. In future, when uploading images to Commons from external sites (such as Photozou or Flickr), you should always add this tag. Hope this helps. --DAJF (talk) 10:16, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Images

hello , @DAJF: I have added sources to all images. Please check them out. Thank you (talk) Makeandtoss (talk) 18:16, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

@DAJF: I was still in the process of collecting sources in order to put them on the pictures, when all my picture were subject to speedy deletion. If you could kindly type a simple warning before doing that. That would be very very great. --Makeandtoss (talk) 23:07, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Actually, they were all copyright violations that appear to have been improperly uploaded to Arabic Wikipedia. You need to be more careful in future about uploading images from dubious sources. --DAJF (talk) 23:48, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Melody Yoko and Maryjun Takahashi at the Shore Magazine launch party.jpg

The owner (Ms. Samantha Rhodes) explained that this content has been released under the public domain license.In fact, the author sent the consent letter to OTRS a month ago, stating that she has a permission to reuse her content from her website (please feel free to contact any of the OTRS agent for confirmation).Therefore, she has an authority to reuse this file from the above-mentioned website, which has not been uploaded in Arabic Wikipedia. --RenRen070193 06:12, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

In case you weren't already aware, I'm not an admin, so I have no idea why you keep telling me this. If permission from the author was sent, you should have tagged the image appropriately at the time. Contact an admin, if you need help, but there's nothing I can do for you. --DAJF (talk) 14:13, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Re: File tagging File:Hybepromo web.jpg

How about now? --Incredibleindividual (talk) 11:39, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi. As explained in the tag I added to the image, you need to provide proof that Hybe Media has given permission for the file to be uploaded to Commons under a free license. --DAJF (talk) 14:12, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

タグに関して

DAJFさん。この度は自分のページにご連絡ありがとうございます。

お問い合わせいただいたタグに関してですが、初めからそれに関するタグが無かったので、やむ追えずタグを付けない形で画像を投稿しました。--筑紫太郎 (talk) 03:50, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

こんにちは。お返事ありがとうございます。
タグではなく、画像を投稿する際、適切なカテゴリに入れて分類していただければ、せっかく投稿していただいた画像は他の編集者たちに簡単に見つけて利用できるようになりますので、お勧めです。Special:UploadWizardを使えば、半自動で少し楽になりますので、試してみていかがでしょうか。　では、筑紫太郎さんが投稿していただいた画像を早速、英版のWikipediaでも使わせていただこうと思いますので、今後も、ご投稿を期待しております。 --DAJF (talk) 08:05, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

DAJFさん。お返事ありがとうございます！

タグじゃなくてカテゴリでしたね＾＾；；間違えて申し訳ありません；；

こちらこそ、色々とご意見を頂いた上に自分の画像を使って下さるとの事でありがとうございます！

今後とも宜しくお願いしますm(__)m--筑紫太郎 (talk) 10:48, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

"Fffdiesel" account for block

Hi,

Please block a "Fffdiesel (talk · contribs)" account for indefinite time, doing to massive copyright violations (uploading non-free television screenshots, non-free film screenshots etc.). Files, uploaded by "Fffdiesel", is ready to uploaded only as fair use files in English Wikipedia and any other Wikimedia projects with fair use media approved.

Thanks, Adrianwo (talk) 14:03, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. I'm not an admin or anything, so I cannot block anyone. I see the editor's uploads have already been marked for speedy deletion as copyright violations, and the editor may well be blocked from editing if they continue to upload copyright images after being warned not to. --DAJF (talk) 14:07, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Re msg

After 10,000 images uploaded I think I have learned. --Discanto (talk) 06:16, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

OK, that's good to hear, although I notice that the latest batch of files you have uploaded is still completely uncategorized. Please do try and make an effort to add your images to a few categories to help other editors find them. --DAJF (talk) 06:20, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
If you look better you'll see that a category exists. P.s.: learns to use Template:Reply to. Good day. --Discanto (talk) 06:36, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
@Discanto: Thanks for the tip about the "Reply to" template. I didn't know about it. And thanks also for categorizing your recent images. Apologies if you felt you were being told how to do something you already knew how to do. --DAJF (talk) 08:33, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Hoodies

Category:Hoodies in Japan

近日逐一差し戻します。（File:西松屋 (4675150608).jpg etc.）--Benzoyl (talk) 12:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

@Benzoyl: さん、こんにちは。　Category:Hoodiesの方には日本語の説明がありますが、「hoodie」とはフード付きパーカのことだけを述べますので、Benzoylさんが先程差し戻したFile:Old game center 柴又.jpegやFile:タヌキの受付 (1649156713).jpgなどはCategory:Hoodies in Japanに入れるべきではないですね。　このような服の画像は、　「Hoodies」とは別にCategory:Hooded clothingやCategory:Hooded clothing in Japanのような新しいカテゴリを作って入れておくとよいでしょう。--DAJF (talk) 13:49, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
また、Category:Hoodies in Japanを先程もう一度チラッと見ましたが、以下の最近アプロードされた画像も、フード付き服装でありながら「hoodies」ではないので、Category:Hoodies in Japanに入ってるのは不正確です。多くなっているようですから、やはり上に書いたように別の適切なカテゴリを作っておいた方がよいかもしれませんね。現段階ではCategory:Hoodsしかないですから。
--DAJF (talk) 14:05, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
大変失礼しました。当方、不適切でした。お詫びいたします。
Category:Hoodsがほぼclothingのカテゴリとなっているので、Category:Hooded clothingでなく、ひとまずCategory:Hooded coats、Category:Hooded jacketsを作成しました。ご指摘ありがとうございました。--Benzoyl (talk) 01:00, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
お疲れ様でした。それでいいと思います。ありがとうございます。　--DAJF (talk) 03:08, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kenji Eda.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shinkansen 955.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chichibu Railway ED38.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aquamarine Fukushima.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kagoshima Street Car Type 1000.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Toyosaka Station, south side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
JNR 301.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dr Ajeenkya D Y Patil.jpg

Hi, after our first response at OTRS we grant 30 days to sort things out, which in case of this specific file has succeeded today. If after 30 days permission is still not in order, we delete the file. Please do not nominate a file with this blue OTRS template for deletion. Jcb (talk) 00:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

OK, fair enough, but you might want to consider modifying the wording of the tag to explain that, as the current wording implies that verification has failed and adequate permission has not been provided for the file it refers to. --DAJF (talk) 01:12, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
I have added some text to Template:OTRS_received - Jcb (talk) 01:33, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 Thank you.. I think that will indeed make it much clearer to other editors who may stumble across similar cases in the future. --DAJF (talk) 01:39, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nanakōdai Station, east entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nanakōdai Station, west entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
JNR 201 in canary yellow livery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

File:Mai Fuchigami.JPG與File:Ai Kayano.JPG

我的本名就是「陳建弘」，這兩張圖像是我親自拍攝上傳。--Chen Jian Hong Sega (talk) 17:17, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

In that case, you really ought to make that clearer on the file itself, ideally by re-adding the link to your user name to clarify that you are one and the same person. --DAJF (talk) 23:44, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
 Comment: And please note that removing the deletion tag from the images is not recommended, and won't actually stop the deletion discussion. --DAJF (talk) 01:22, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Koshigaya Station, east entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Koshigaya Station, west entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tokyu 5200 series in preservation.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sakado Station (Saitama), north entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sakado Station (Saitama), south entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
400 series shinkansen in original livery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Year in rail transport categories

Before the images are moved to month categories it is much more important that these have a Year in rail transport by country category. I created Category:2014 in rail transport in Serbia. Unfortunately this can take a lot of work when the country is not yet categorised this way. (templates en underlying subcategories).Smiley.toerist (talk) 09:15, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

OK, thanks for creating that category. --DAJF (talk) 09:07, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

勝手に画像を差し戻さないでください。

あなたは「軽微な変更」と述べていますが、掲載ページの説明などは最新版に合わせており違和感が生じます。

いずれにせよ私が「必要」と判断して行っており、警告期間などの猶予もなくすべて差し戻されるのは納得がいきません！！！--根川孝太郎 (talk) 03:11, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

@根川孝太郎: こんにちは。「Commons:Overwriting existing files」に日本語での説明もあるようですので、それを読んでいただければ、納得いただけると思います。警告期間が特に必要ありませんが、もし差し戻されたファイルの中でCommonsでの説明やカテゴリーなどに矛盾が存在していれれば、教えていただければ、すぐ修正します。なお、Commons以外で使われている場合は、お手数ですが、必要な対応は根川孝太郎様ご自身でお願いいたします。　--DAJF (talk) 23:37, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
おっしゃる内容読ませていただきました。確かにFile:Ochikawa by Hino, Tokyo.jpgなどは私の認識不足なのも確かです。すいません。
しかし、一気に差し戻してしまうのは行き過ぎではないでしょうか？
解説をよく読んでいなかったのは確かですが、もっと早く問い合わせてくだされば「別のファイル」として投稿することも出来たのかな…と。--根川孝太郎 (talk) 02:56, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Batch 2015.jpg

File:Batch 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

153.142.61.14 09:42, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Reverting editions by OTRS members

DAJF, before claiming that a user is not an OTRS member, don't see just the User page; the only official information is Special:CentralAuth. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:31, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

@Amitie 10g: OK, my apologies. I did actually check the list of OTRS members linked to from the OTRS tag on the image, and Techyan wasn't (and still isn't) listed there. Maybe that link should be replaced in the OTRS tag by a link to Special:CentralAuth if that is a more reliable way of checking. --DAJF (talk) 23:22, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Deliberate revert

Hi, Do you always mess with other people's stuff? - Avatar9n (talk) 13:11, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

@Avatar9n: Hi. If by "messing with other people's stuff" you are referring to trying to improve accessibility and navigability by adding valid categories to files that other users have uploaded, then yes, I do it all the time. That's precisely how Wikimedia Commons and other Wiki-based projects are supposed to work, with everyone chipping in to make improvements. --DAJF (talk) 01:11, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
It was more than "improving accessibility and navigability", we know why you did it. - Avatar9n (talk) 08:52, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Created new Category for Images nominated to be deleted for Wiki Loves Earth India 2016

Hi there & Greetings from Wikimedia India & Organizers of Wiki Loves Earth India 2016

We have created a category which consists all images which have been nominated for deletion from the images which have been uploaded for Wiki Loves Earth India 2016

Category:Wiki Loves Earth in India 2016 Photos nominated for deletion

Can you please occasionally check on them and ensure if the photos get deleted.

Thanks Yohannvt (talk) 06:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

OK, thanks. I'll keep an eye on that page. --DAJF (talk) 13:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Echigo Kotsuのファイルについて

DAJFさん、こんにちは。 DAJFさんはCategory:Echigo KotsuのファイルにBuses in Japanを付け加えてくれましたが、 Buses in Japan > Buses in Japan by operator > Buses in Chūbu region > Bus operators in Niigata prefecture > Echigo Kotsu というふうに既にBuses in Japanのカテゴリ内にあるのでBuses in Japanの付与は不要なのです。

ところで、いつも様々なファイルを整理してくれまして、ありがとうございます。 この機会に御礼を申し上げます。 --Fb noo (talk) 10:46, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

@Fb nooさん、 こんばんは。今確認してみましたら、仰った通り、不要だったんですね。　当時、気が付きませんでしたので、ご指摘ありがとうございます。 今後もどうぞよろしくお願いします。 --DAJF (talk) 13:47, 12 June 2016 (UTC)


Welcome, Dear Filemover!

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（台灣）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hi DAJF, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.
Jianhui67 talk★contribs 10:42, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
 Thank you.: OK, thanks very much. --DAJF (talk) 03:52, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

またやらかしてしまいました… 改名依頼願います！

たびたびすいません。根川孝太郎 (talk)です。 このファイル「File:TOYOT CROUN (S200) Patrol Car (left-Side).jpg」をアップロードした際、「TOYOTA」とすべきところを「TOYOT」になっている事と、「CROWN」とすべきスペルが「CROUN」に気付いてしまいました。

ファイルの改名については先ほど読ませていただき、自己都合による「File:TOYOTA CROWN (S200) Patrol Car (left-Side).jpg」への改名を依頼したく思いコメントしました。


また、リダイレクト整理やカテゴリ追加も行っていていてくれてありがとうございました！！。--根川孝太郎 (talk) 02:38, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done： 根川孝太郎さん、 早速改名させていただきました。　またご不明な点がありましたら、どうぞご連絡ください。　--DAJF (talk) 02:49, 23 August 2016 (UTC)


 Comment早速の改名有難うございます！。コモンズは不慣れなもので、今後もお手数掛けるかも知れませんが宜しくお願いします。--根川孝太郎 (talk) 03:07, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

ちょっとお伺いしたのですが…よろしいでしょうか？

こんばんわ。根川孝太郎 (talk)です。 今回、File:BMW i8 Front (left).jpgの画像改良を模索した結果、別ショットのFile:BMW i8 Front (left)置換用.jpgをアップロードする事としました。

本当ならFile:BMW i8 Front (left).jpgへ上書きしたいのですが、あなたに注意された前歴 がありますので基準を伺いたく質問いたしました。

一応、File:BMW i8 Front (left).jpgとの差異はアングルと架空のナンバープレートを嵌め込んだくらいです。上書きが「不可」ならFile:BMW i8 Front (left).jpgの削除依頼を出し、完了後にFile:BMW i8 Front (left)置換用.jpgをFile:BMW i8 Front (left).jpgに改名して頂きたく思います。

DAJFさん。頼りにしていますのでどうかお答えください！！。--根川孝太郎 (talk) 09:39, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

根川孝太郎さん、こんばんは。　早速、拝見しました。　後からアップロードしていただいたFile:BMW i8 Front (left)置換用.jpgは、File:BMW i8 Front (left).jpgとは別の画像です（違う角度から撮られたようで）ので、上書きはNGですね。最初にアップロードしたFile:BMW i8 Front (left).jpgは特に問題ないような画像ですので、そのまま残して、その後撮った同じ車両を写った他の画像を「File:BMW i8 Front (left)(2).jpg」などのファイル名を付けてアップすればよいと思います。ナンバープレートをぼかしたりはめ込んだりする場合は、上書きしても問題ないです。
また、別の話ですが、ファイル名や解説には「左正面」と書いていますが、日本語の場合は正面から見て左の考えでしょうか？　英語の場合は、車などの車両は基本的に運転席に座った時での右・左を使いますから、ちょっと違和感を覚えています。（英語ですが、この説明がわかりやすいかもしれません。）　「right」に変える必要があるかもしれません。
--DAJF (talk) 10:57, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 CommentDAJFさん、ご返信ありがとうございます。やはり上書きは不可なのですね…了解です。
なるほど。改名を依頼するならば「File:BMW i8 Front (left)置換用.jpg」は「File:BMW i8 Front (left) New.jpg」に改名していただきたく思います。
また、「ファイル名や解説には「左正面」と書いていますが、日本語の場合は正面から見て左の考えでしょうか？　英語の場合は、車などの車両は基本的に運転席に座った時での右・左を使いますから、ちょっと違和感を覚えています。」
と述べられておりますが、自分は「正面を基準」にしている為、これを当てはめると「適切な向きである」と解釈しております。
万一にも不適切なのだとしたら、いくつか改名依頼をせざるを得ないファイルが生じてしまうんです…。--根川孝太郎 (talk) 03:06, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
✓ Done --DAJF (talk) 03:25, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

度々なのですが、またまた改名依頼願います…

根川孝太郎 (talk)です。先ほどは迅速な改名作業ありがとうございました！。毎度毎度、感謝してもしきれません。

そこで度々なのですが、検討の末File:Ne-River (2015-03) by Hino, Tokyo.jpgのファイル名をFile:Ne-River by Hino, Tokyo (2015-03).jpgにした方が好ましいのではないか…と思いまして、ちょっとご連絡しました。

しつこいようですが宜しくお願い致します。--根川孝太郎 (talk) 03:46, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done. 早速改名させていただきましたので、どうぞご確認ください。　またのご依頼がありましたら、ご連絡をいつでも気軽にどうぞ。 --DAJF (talk) 03:54, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 Comment毎度有難うございます！。--根川孝太郎 (talk) 02:05, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

御指摘、有難うございます。

DAJF様、初めまして。栗原 岳と申します。 この度は、大変お手数おかけ致しました。 お察しかと存じますが、当方、Wikipedia初心者で、パソコンにもさほど詳しくない為、何度もお手数おかけする結果になってしまいました。 ［このファイルの新しい版をアップロードする］も試したのですが、どうしても上手くいかず、結局、同一画像を別ファイル名でアップしました。 今後もまた御迷惑をおかけしてしまうかも知れませんが、どうか宜しくお願い致します。 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 栗原 岳 (talk • contribs) 14:52, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

栗原様、ご連絡ありがとうございます。
WikipediaやCommonsは、最初の方は色んな決まりがあって覚えることが多く、大変ですが、すぐ慣れますよ。
画像を改善して再アップロードする際、今後はなるべくこのファイルの新しい版をアップロードするをクリックして、上書きするようにアップロードしてください。今回上手くできなかったところは、おそらくアップロードした直後、栗原さん自身の画面には反映されていないように見えて何度も同じ画像をアップロードしてしまったからだと思いますが、画面をリフレッシュすればすぐに反映されるはずですので、一回アップロードしてから、慌てないで何もしなくても結構です。別のファイル名でアップロードしてしまいますと、栗原さんの他に少なくとも2人が動く必要があり、特に忙しい管理人者さんたちに対して不必要な手間をかけることになります。
また今後、新規の画像をアップロードする際、できれば、「日付」の欄にアップロードした日の日付ではなくその写真を実際に撮った日付を記入していただければ助かります。日付が不明な場合、何も記入しなくても結構ですが、{{Unknown|date}}と記入していただければ、各言語に自動的に翻訳されます。
まだ不明な点がありましたら、いつでも気軽にご連絡ください。　--DAJF (talk) 00:53, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

御連絡、有難うございます。

DAJF様

一応、やってみたのですが、問題無かったと解釈してよろしいのですね。 わざわざ御連絡下さいまして有難うございました。

栗原 岳 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 栗原 岳 (talk • contribs) 02:26, 06 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tokyo Metro 1000 series.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shin-Keisei 8800 series in original (beige/brown) livery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

削除以来云々

日本語で説明していただけますか? Fujimori5 (talk) 23:06, 20 September 2016

Replied on User's talk page. --DAJF (talk) 00:54, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tobu 200 series train in "Puyuma Express" livery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former Daishi Bank Sumiyoshi-cho Branch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kotesashi Station south entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kotesashi Station north entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

File:Yakushisan (Happo-cho).jpg のファイル名について

始めまして「らんで」と言います。 さて、私がアップした、 File:Yakusisan (Happoutyô).jpg　のファイル名を File:Yakushisan (Happo-cho).jpg と改名しているようですが、これは何か規約があるのでしょうか？ 私は、自分の意思でファイル名はできるだけ「訓令式ローマ字」でアップするように心がけていますし、その旨とその根拠は私の利用者ページにも書き込んでいます。

しかし、それはダメだというのなら、是非規約なりその理由を知らせてください。以後、気を付けますから。 — Preceding unsigned comment added by らんで (talk • contribs) 14:21, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

らんでさん、　こんにちは。DAJFです。
コメントありがとうございます。らんでさんの利用者ページはまだ白紙状態のようで、訓令式ローマ字をなるべくお使いしたいというご意思は気づきませんでした。ファイル名の付け方についてCommons:File namingというガイドラインがありまして（日本語版もご覧になれます）、基本的にどの言語を使っても大丈夫ですとのことです。ただ、多くの利用者にとって使いやすい方が理想です。例えば、薬師山関連の画像を探してる利用者はおそらく「薬師山」や「Yakushisan」を入力して検索します。ファイル名が「Yakusisan」になっていますと検索されない可能性が高いです。また、「jinja」関連の検索では「zinzya」と名付けられたファイルもおそらく発見されないでしょう。　「ô」や「ō」などの文字は使用禁止ではありませんが、認識の問題になりやすいので、なるべくファイル名の中では避けた方がよろしいかと思います。
上に書きましたように、強制的な規約というものがありませんが今後、なるべく多くの利用者にとってわかりやすくて使いやすいファイル名をご検討いただければ幸いです。 --DAJF (talk) 23:59, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
うーん。結論を言えば、納得できません。私は「訓令式ローマ字」がより良いローマ字であると思っていますので、そのような基準でファイル名を改名するのなら、私自身は以後も同じ基準でファイル名を付けていきたいと思います。--らんで (talk) 11:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tobu 8000 series in orange livery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review


Congratulations, Dear license reviewer

If you use the helper scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi DAJF, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.freenode.net. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 12:22, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tobu 50090 series in "Flying Tojo" (blue) livery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
JR East KiHa 100 series in JNR vermillion and cream livery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

File:Asuka Nishi PC DIY SHOP FreeT event 20121026.jpg

File:Asuka Nishi PC DIY SHOP FreeT event 20121026.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Please explain why was the "Category: Yoga" removed from all the photos I uploaded?

Hi DAJF,

Please explain why the "Category: Yoga" was removed from all the files I have uploaded of yoga poses?

An admin on Wikipedia, MatthewVanitas (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MatthewVanitas) recommended that I categorize my posts with the tag "Category: Yoga".

Please advise what you recommend I do, and please be very specific.

MilenaGlebova1989 (talk) 00:08, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

@MilenaGlebova1989: Hi. Sorry for taking a while to reply to your message. The images I saw were categorized in Category:Asana, so they should not also be placed in the parent category Category:Yoga. This is known as "over-categorization", and is explained at COM:OVERCAT. I hope this clarifies the situation. --DAJF (talk) 10:16, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Kajal Aggarwal Nude.jpg

This image shouldn't be removed because it's real and beautiful image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by What The Flop? (talk • contribs) 12:54, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

お礼

DAJF様、こんにちは。井戸端でLicenseReviewについて質問していたFb nooと申します。LicenseReviewの必要のないものを元に戻していただきまして、どうもありがとうございました。--Fb noo (talk) 09:38, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Fb noo様、こんばんは。井戸端でも別の方から同じ答えが出たようですが、Wikipedia日本語版から移動された画像には基本的にLicenseReviewが必要ありませんので、今後ご心配なさらないでください。 わざわざご連絡ありがとうございました。--DAJF (talk) 10:01, 26 December 2016 (UTC)


Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DAJF/archive&oldid=300723915"