User talk:D.wine/Archive

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to the Commons, D.wine/Archive!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:DomNaKotelNaber.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. --Filnik 11:24, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP

[edit]

I'm sorry if that's how you feel, but these are standard FPC rules. The picture is overexposed (right hand side) and the depicted gecko has no identification (what species is it?). Unless someone else than you, the nominator, disagrees with this within 48 hours and gives a supporting vote, the image will be removed form FPC. This is nothing personal and everybody has the right to take such a decision. If other voters do not agree, the template will be removed. Regards. Lycaon 16:02, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand, what means "overexposed"? Whay it's the reason for remove my nominatiion? And why everyone but me can cancel the removing? And what rights you have to remove it? This pucture has very good quality and no problems with license. I see in nomination list puctures with much poor quality and they are not voted for remove. -D.wine 16:24, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Overexposure means that there is to much light: part of your image is pure white, it is too bright. (please read Guidelines onexposure).
It also has no proper identification (the species is not mentioned) and it is obviously a zoo picture with an unnatural background. These pictures are not really fit for FP.
Additionally, it suffers from low DOF (depth of field).
If you want some feedback on your pictures, before submitting them to COM:FPC or COM:QIC, then you can get that at Photography critiques.
And lastly, I won't remove your image, if necessary, somebody else will. Regards Lycaon 17:00, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There is white parts because of camera illumination! There is a luminescent lamp from right side, that's why it's white. (BTW in the link you give there are very bad quality pictures, which are actually scans.) I duuno what the species he is, I know he is Gekkoninae, isn't that enough? Where is wrote that botanist knowledge required for FP? And where is wrote that pictures from zoo "are not really fit for FP"? So please stop searching for a reason to remove my picture!
You also haven't answer where you get rights for remove nominations, are you admin or what? If you sick of this picture you have your right to vote against it, but you have no rights to remove it. Why'd you think the only you can decide should picture be nominated or not, let peoples decide it! --D.wine 16:52, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please remain civil. I have answered all your questions. Your attitude is not appreciated. Lycaon 17:21, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You haven't answer more than half questions. You operate with dim reasons which are not wroten nowhere in rules trying to remove my nomination. You do absolutly illegal acting, which you haven't rights for. --D.wine 16:24, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry you are upset that your nomination was removed. Please see Commons talk:Featured picture candidates#Speed-up warning template, and the discussion and vote above that, for more details about the template. I have to tell you that Lycaon is quite correct in his opinion, and that your picture had no chance of success. Had others supported the nomination, they could have voted for it at any time even after the template had been added. Lycaon's actions were also perfectly correct, and followed normal FPC procedures. --MichaelMaggs 21:43, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rubus idaeus leaf.JPG

[edit]

Please write English Description! THanks --Beyond silence 21:31, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Man, I've paste english description (in braces). --D.wine 16:54, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Сретенский бульвар

[edit]

ты забыл категорию там поставить. И кстати, чем ты снимаешь? Чио за камера? --Alex Rave 17:39, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Там метаданные вроде сохранились - Canon A550. D.wine 17:49, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Picture use

[edit]

Hi there, I used your picture of Sokolniki park in our online cityguide: http://www.staedte-reisen.de/moskau/sightseeing/parks

Hope you like it and the copyright is o.k.! Regards Antonia

ok D.wine 06:57, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Направления

[edit]

Не добавляйте в изображения несуществующих категорий! Надо делать категории не по направлениям, а по железнодорожным линиям. Если Вы не знаете, как это делается — предоставьте мне. --S[1] 20:50, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Задам Вам глупый вопрос: мы можем как-нибудь объясниться без мата и оскорблений? --S[1] 21:03, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Можно, только когда я вижу, как какой-нибудь умник разом ломает то, что было создано долгим кропотливым трудом, только такие слова на ум и приходят. Я жду объяснений. 79.111.22.170 21:11, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Я тоже создаю категории долгим кропотливым трудом и каждый день стараюсь поддерживать порядок в российских категориях.

Причины, по которым я Ваши правки откатил:

1) Категории, которые Вы добавляли, не существуют.

2) Эти категории имеют неподходящее название:

В аналогичных категориях зарубежных стран речь никогда не идёт о «направлениях», а только о железнодорожных линиях — Category:Railway lines by country. Но, к примеру, «Белорусское направление» и «Железнодорожная линия Москва — Минск» это не одно и тоже. Ответвление на Звенигород относится к Белорусскому направлению, но это отдельная железнодорожная ветка.

Поэтому я уже давно начал создавать категории по ж.д.линиям и сортировать изображения станций по ним. Из тех что уже созданы — Category:Moscow-Kursk Railway, Category:Moscow-Minsk Railway, Category:Big circle Moscow railway. Для Ярославского направления подходит категория Category:Trans-Siberian railway, т.к. линия Москва—Ярославль является частью Транссиба. Для ответвлений можно создавать собственные категории. Хотите Вы этого или нет — но и российская система категорий должна соответствовать принятым здесь стандартам. --S[1] 21:44, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Кстати, вот эта правка — однозначно бред, потому что из неё следует, что Николаевская железная дорога является станцией и находится только в Московской области. На самом же деле, НЖД — железнодорожная линия, проходящая по Москве, СПБ, Московской, Тверской, Новгородской и Ленинградской областям. Вам пока что явно не хватает элементарных знаний здешнего категоризирования. --S[1] 21:44, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Я, конечно, извиняюсь за грубость, но блин, надо же предупреждать, прежде чем тупо удалять и откатывать правки! В конце концов, можно было заменить "неподходящие", по вашим словам названия на "подходящие".
И почему, простите, такие названия не подходящие? Потому что вам так захотелось? Я не знаю, как у вас там в Германии, но у на в России подобные понятия для железных дорог вполне подходящие, даже вот: ru:Смоленское_направление_Московской_железной_дороги. И вообще, мы говорим об остановках пригородных электричек, при чем тут вообще дорога Москва - Минск? Транссибирская магистраль - это дорога Москва - Владивосток, вы представляете себе, сколько на этой дороге длиной 10000 км остановочных пунктов? Вы думаете в таком количестве можно будет найти то фото, которое нужно? Не знаю, какой целью вы руководствуетесь, вводя такие категории, но я лично руководствуюсь только тем, чтобы нужное фото для станции можно было легко найти, а сделать это в нынешнем бардаке не представляется возможным. А для всяких ответвлений типа Голицыно - Звенигород отдельных категорий уж точно не нужно! Вполне сойдет смоленское направление МЖД. Не переходите из одной крайности в другую! D.wine (talk) 15:24, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
D.wine, я подумаю, как лучше пристроить эти фотографии. Ясно, что изображение нужно категоризировать так, чтобы его легко можно было найти, но и ясно, что система российских категорий должна быть максимально сравнима с аналогичной системой, используемой для других стран. Кстати, спасибо за фотографии Малых Вязём и Дачного. --S[1] 19:25, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moscow-Ryazan Railway

[edit]

Привет. Насчёт этой правки я не уверен в ее корректности, разве же не так, что железная дорога Москва-Рязань является частью Московско-Казанской? Или это касается только ветки от Люберец-1 через Шатуру? В противном случае Вашу категорию следовало бы сделать подкатегорией Moscow-Kazan Railway. --S[1] 11:47, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ну так от Москвы до Люберец идет Казанка и Рязанка! После Люберец он расходятся. Как же ты фоткал и не знаешь такого? Смотри шаблоны в Википедии. Подкатегорией она быть не может - это две совершенно равные дороги! D.wine (talk) 18:52, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
З.Ы. Станция Панки относится к Рязанской дороге - Википедия. D.wine (talk) 18:54, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fernrohr (talk) 22:06, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Russian buildings

[edit]

Hi. Based on your participation in Commons:Deletion requests/Kotelnicheskaya, I think you will be interested in Commons:Categories for discussion/2011/01/Category:Buildings in Russia.   — Jeff G. ツ 19:56, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:KaretuMne.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:17, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely Artem Karimov (talk) 05:43, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely Artem Karimov (talk) 05:45, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely Artem Karimov (talk) 05:48, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely Artem Karimov (talk) 06:34, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely Artem Karimov (talk) 22:05, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tower 2000 in Moscow.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.61.181.19 19:47, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:LeninKalujskyi.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ymblanter (talk) 11:11, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]