User talk:Dnikitin
TUSC token 8c2f5fa5a0f7315557c3ed3b98492876
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Поздравляю с получением статуса робота! Думаю, что на User:D'ohBot стоит указать Ваши страницы в Commons, а не в русской Википедии, чтобы было проще другим участникам Commons. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Спасибо.
- Я захожу в ру-вики почти каждый день. И написать на моей старнице в рувики можно и на английском, а ответ будет намного оперативнее. Я не всегда имею возможность проверять не пришли ли новые сообщения мне в en, uk, commons, поэтому лучше писать все таки мне на "домашнюю" вики. --Dnikitin (talk) 20:44, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Files you uploaded may be deleted
[edit]The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commonswikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 22:39, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
And maybe others: Good idea to upload this with AWB(?) if you did. However, the link is not enough. Provide at least an weblink to the album on the website. --Martin H. (talk) 10:20, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
- The most of the photos from Category:Photographs_by_Erik_van_Leeuwen have the same link on the site rather that album. OTRS-permission says that *all* photos is under GFDL.
- I used Commons:Tools/Commonist. It saves my time. Dnikitin (talk) 12:17, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- The link for many images is piped, see the source link at File:Elvan Abeylegesse 2010 European Team Championships.jpg, only the visible appereance of the link is the short form, the link leads to the image. Thats required for verification. --Martin H. (talk) 12:43, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Oh.. I see. I've fixed the links on the source files. Thanks for explanation. --Dnikitin (talk) 13:11, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- The link for many images is piped, see the source link at File:Elvan Abeylegesse 2010 European Team Championships.jpg, only the visible appereance of the link is the short form, the link leads to the image. Thats required for verification. --Martin H. (talk) 12:43, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 12:45, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Luzhsky rayon 31-07-2004.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:45, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Vladimir Markin (SK).jpg was uncategorized on 30 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:31, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Юбилейная медаль «60 лет. 64-й истребительный авиационный корпус».jpg was uncategorized on 30 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:31, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Emma Engstrand
[edit]If you rename a category, the old empty one does not need to be "nominated" for deletion, but instead you can use {{Speedydelete}}. --LA2 (talk) 17:23, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. Dnikitin (talk) 23:52, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Re: Images from picasa
[edit]Hey Dnikitin, thank you for your advice, {{Picasareview}} didn't look good in description text-area, but in new version of Commonist it is really true that license area is editable. BTW It would be nice to set cron job for inserting {{Picasareview}}, not everyone have to know that should insert template. And I would like to suggest you automatically mark (of course by bot) as reviewed files uploaded by highly trusted users like stewards, global sysops, WMF staff, etc. Regards, LeinaD dyskusja 23:15, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- I trust you, of course. But there are formal rules. I made request to be reviewer. If reviewer-status is granted to me I will mark all uploaded from WOC 2010 photos as reviewed. -- Dnikitin (talk) 02:19, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Great initiative! :-) LeinaD dyskusja 15:45, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, didn't watch for dates, now it's OK. --Smooth_O (talk) 18:44, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks --Dnikitin (talk) 22:50, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Переименуйте
[edit]еще категорию российских рублей 2004 года с русского на английский) --Vizu (talk) 11:20, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- не понял о какой категории идет речь и во что ее переименовать? —Dnikitin (talk) 17:24, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Музейная фотосъёмка
[edit]Откатил, потому что не понимаю, что вы такое сделали. Зачем картинка с запретом? В музеях России можно фотографировать безо всяких проблем.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:38, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
- Не возражаю. Просто эта картинка у меня как раз ассоциируется с музеями. Они там на каждом шагу. Показывают, что свободно фотографировать нельзя, только за отдельную доплату. --192.9.112.196 09:49, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
- Вы, наверное, не пробовали узнать, что значат эти вывески. Если они означают, что надо купить билет -- купите билет, вы ведь покупаете его для входа в музей, и нет причин, по которым музей должен бесплатно позволять вам фотографировать свои вещи.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 10:31, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
- Да я не спорю. Вот я и разместил картинку «Хотите фотографировать — купите билет». --Dnikitin (talk) 10:50, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
- Согласен, там надо поставить какую-то иллюстрацию. Постараюсь подобрать. Ваш вариант выглядел как "запрет вообще", потому я и не понял, при чём тут эта картинка. В общем, пойду искать билеты :-).--PereslavlFoto (talk) 11:01, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
- Нашёл греческий билет и дописал подробности о том, что позволяет и что не позволяет билет. Спасибо за поставленную задачу!--PereslavlFoto (talk) 11:25, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
- Да я не спорю. Вот я и разместил картинку «Хотите фотографировать — купите билет». --Dnikitin (talk) 10:50, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
- Вы, наверное, не пробовали узнать, что значат эти вывески. Если они означают, что надо купить билет -- купите билет, вы ведь покупаете его для входа в музей, и нет причин, по которым музей должен бесплатно позволять вам фотографировать свои вещи.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 10:31, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
POTY votes
[edit]Remember that you can vote only once in the final round; I saw you voted for more than one image in the final round: I suggest you to remove all your votes and leave just one, otherwise none of your votes will be counted. Have a nice day, --Broc (talk) 20:57, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
В данном случае, по уму, нужно удалять исходный файл, и заново загружать версию с "допустимым" разрешением. Иначе старая-то версия остаётся доступна - её легко можно вернуть, или просто взять и использовать. Лучше, наверное, не вводить во искушение ;) --Kaganer (talk) 21:06, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
- Прав у меня нет на удаление. Хотел попросить администраторов, да руки не дошли. Думаю, что даже если удалить, ищущий да найдет большое разрешение по ссылке на источник файла, так что не такое уж и искушение. Если у вас есть права на удаление, то удалите версию с 1024 × 735 --Dnikitin (talk) 21:22, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
- У меня нет, но я попрошу компетентных товарищей ;)
- Done --Kaganer (talk) 08:26, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- На будущее - есть спец. шаблоны для выставления на удаление, и даже специальный гаджет можно себе включить. В любом случае, если получено разрешение на фото конкретного разрешения, то его нужно загружать отдельно. А что там по ссылке на источник - пусть это пользователи с автором разбираются. Главное, чтобы неправильная версия не распространялась через Викисклад. --Kaganer (talk) 08:08, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- У меня нет, но я попрошу компетентных товарищей ;)
Logo cut
[edit]Здравствуйте, обрежьте, пожалуйста, логотипы с фотографий, загруженных в Category:Photos_by_Vitaly_Kuzmin. Не очень хорошо смотрятся в статьях. --VitalyKuzmin (talk) 18:18, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- Добрый день. Я не умею убирать надписи на фото. Я проставил шаблон {{Watermark}} на фотографии. Надеюсь кто-нибудь откликнется. --Dnikitin (talk) 19:01, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- Аналогичная проблема, ничего не понимаю, куда тут в вики жать :) Надеюсь, кто-нибудь отредактирует. Либо проще, когда копируете, сразу на компьютере редактировать (делать кроп) и заливать уже без лого. --VitalyKuzmin (talk) 17:07, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
[edit]Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:09, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
File:Fedorov Nikolay Fedorovich Luga.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ymblanter (talk) 11:42, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
File:Fedorov Nikolay Fedorovich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ymblanter (talk) 11:44, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement
[edit]Bot de-flagging notification
[edit]Hi Dnikitin, I'm writing to you because your bot D'ohBot (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) is about to be de-flagged as a result of inactivity for a period longer than two years. If you'd like to keep that account flagged as a bot, please speak up at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag 2#Discussion; otherwise, I'll remove the bot flag from that account in a month from now (10 May 2014). Thanks for your understanding, odder (talk) 13:17, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Inactive Image-reviewers
[edit]Hello Dnikitin, there is a discussion about a request regarding your image-reviewer user right, which have never been used or not used recently. You can participate discussion in Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Inactive_Image-reviewers. This is just a notification of discussion you may be involved. Best regards, --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 15:52, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- Спасибо, что занимаетесь таким важным делом, Андрей. Фото взято с сайта, где автор явно пишет "Использование фотографий с сайта - свободное (при указании источника или авторства)." было бы хорошо, если бы вы занялись оформлением OTRS разрешения или поискали нет ли его еще. --144.24.20.226 15:26, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:RR3318-0012 150 rubles USSR 1989 Platinum avers.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:RR3318-0012 150 rubles USSR 1989 Platinum avers.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:RR3318-0012 150 rubles USSR 1989 Platinum avers.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Jcb (talk) 21:05, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:RR3318-0013 150 rubles USSR 1990 Platinum avers.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:RR3318-0013 150 rubles USSR 1990 Platinum avers.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:RR3318-0013 150 rubles USSR 1990 Platinum avers.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Jcb (talk) 21:05, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Platinum coin 100kr Estonia 2008.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Platinum coin 100kr Estonia 2008.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Platinum coin 100kr Estonia 2008.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 11:31, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
File:Platinum coin 100kr Estonia 2008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 08:58, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
File:Памятник Мыльникову.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Dogad75 (talk) 13:59, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey
[edit]Dear Dnikitin,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.
Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.
Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:29, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Xunks (talk) 16:10, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Imagine Peace Tower.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 20:36, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Электрический Белаз.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ahachri (talk) 10:39, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 18:13, 30 April 2024 (UTC)