User talk:Cruccone
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
-Samulili 16:14, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi! You asked me about this image. The problem with the image isn't big, but we would need an email from the friend to tell that they are giving up certain rights. This email should be sent to OTRS. Regards, -Samulili 16:14, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Battistero Agrate.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Battistero Agrate.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. G.dallorto 13:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Palio
[edit]Ciao, ho letto il template. Ti volevo dire che al tempo quando le caricai mi fu detto della questione dei diritti del consorzio del palio, su wiki.it, da un Ines (senese) che si sarebbe fatto carico di informare il consorzio stesso in merito. Non ho saputo più nulla.--Illy78 17:03, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- E m'immagino che non sia molto chiara. Ricordo che per gli stemmi ed i colori delle contrade ci fu già un autorizzazione, ma io con queste cose "burocratiche" non ci sono tanto per la quale :). Grazie per il messaggio ;). Un saluto--Illy78 06:56, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:1984 Feyenoord Kampioen Cruijff.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
--Ilse@ 08:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:LorenzBranchetti BN.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--User:G.dallorto 16:59, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Grazie, ho corretto la pagina eliminando la parte sbagliata e cancellato la richiesta. --User:G.dallorto 19:27, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Erlenbach_ZH_-_Wappen_-_001.gif
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Erlenbach_ZH_-_Wappen_-_001.gif. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. ChristianBier 21:32, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Uetikon_am_See_-_Wappen_-_001.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Uetikon_am_See_-_Wappen_-_001.png. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. ChristianBier 16:27, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Küsnacht_ZH_-_Wappen_-_001.gif
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Küsnacht_ZH_-_Wappen_-_001.gif. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. ChristianBier 16:56, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Hombrechtikon_-_Wappen_-_001.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Hombrechtikon_-_Wappen_-_001.png. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. ChristianBier 17:01, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Herrliberg_-_Wappen_-_001.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Herrliberg_-_Wappen_-_001.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. ChristianBier 17:06, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Egg_ZH_-_Wappen.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Egg_ZH_-_Wappen.png. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. ChristianBier 17:14, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Ciao. Per favore, potresti dare un'occhiata all'immagine in oggetto? Mi pare un Flickr-copyvio (non credo sia nemmeno eleggibile per il "PD-Italy", data l'artisticità della foto. Grazie--Trixt 23:54, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, leggo che confermi le mie impressioni. Potresti quindi richiederne l'immediata? Se la richiesta è dello stesso uploader di solito ci sono meno problemi. Grazie--Trixt 01:47, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Lac_de_Mauvoisin.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Lac_de_Mauvoisin.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Code·is·poetry 13:37, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Volevo segnalarti che la tua foto in oggetto è stata utilizzata qui ma non vi è alcuna indicazione della fonte. Ciao. --Luigi Chiesa (talk) 21:05, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
TUSC token b7149e256dd428c2e7492885acc3f364
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
TUSC token a85eb132f95b9e976cdef3f23d82e6b3
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 05:44, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Image:LGATasmania KingIs.png is uncategorized since 26 April 2009.
- Image:Castillo Belmonte techo.jpg was uncategorized on 4 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:09, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- Image:El Cardoso de la Sierra.jpg was uncategorized on 4 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:09, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Beteta desde el castillo.jpg was uncategorized on 19 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:46, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Roche Sanadoire.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:59, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Pinilla del Valle iglesia decoracion patio.JPG was uncategorized on 25 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:09, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Ortstafelmitstorch.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Ortstafelmitstorch.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ortstafelmitstorch.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Suhadi Sadono (talk) 18:04, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
== Val Cavallina ==Mi s
Hai ragione grazie per la segnalazione. Lascio libero il campo "categorizzazione delle chiese" così non interferisco con il tuo lavoro che è senz'altro più qualificato. Saluti--Albertomos (talk) 17:06, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Chiese camune
[edit]Ciao Cruccone, vedo che stai facendo un ottimo lavoro. Cerco per quel che posso di starti dietro e migliorare un po' la descrizione dei file che avevo caricato. Buona continuazione! --Lord Hidelan 18:42, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Please help replace this outdated license
[edit]Hello!
Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.
The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.
Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.
The images we would like you to check are:
BotMultichillT 20:21, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
TUSC token 60d69058530d87a7e9ee26276173dc94
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot
Diocese vs Archdiocese
[edit]Ciao, giusto perché sto facendo un certo lavoro di categorizzazione dedicato quasi esclusivamente alla chiese mi sto facendo un po' di cultura che mi permetto di condividere. Ho scoperto per caso che quella di Milano è un'Arcidiocesi e quindi, per correttezza, ho chiesto lo spostamento della Category:Diocese of Milan a Category:Archdiocese of Milan (e le "Churches in" vanno di conseguenza). dato che sei tra i più attivi fotografi lombardi o comunque che si occupano di media lombardi ti chiedo cortesemente di rammentarlo per evitare di riempire nuovamente delle cat errate e, data la presumibile poca competenza dell'admin medio commonaro, si rischierebbe magari un'inversione di redirect in base al detto "never leave the old road for a new". :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 18:01, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
- Se non ho capito male gli admin possono usare un bot per gli spostamenti in massa. Presumo solo che ci vadano cauti prima di eseguire facendo qualche controllo incrociato (io almeno farei così) e in altri casi in cui ho richiesto lo spostamento questo è andato a buon fine. Io direi che possiamo aspettare qualche giorno e vedere che succede e semmai facciamo una richiesta diretta nella talk di Foroa, con cui ho discusso qualche volta e credo di essermi meritato la fiducia, o di Túrelio, che ho visto fare fisicamente gli spostamenti che ho richiesto :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 19:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
Sulle cat per diocesi
[edit]Ciao, ho visto ora che hai fatto dei cambiamenti su una delle cat create per diocesi. Io ti dico la mia, giusto per mettere sul piatto le mie riflessioni: pensavo fosse più semplice, per chi ricerca una chiesa per diocesi di appartenenza, di trovarla in base all'attribuzione per santo patrono, per cui la Category:San Biagio (Alleghe), ordinata per Biagio e non per Alleghe, è meglio stia direttamente nella cat piuttosto che il comune di appartenenza, tanto più che ci sono casi di chiese che si trovano in una provincia diversa dalla diocesi (che alle volte nemmeno fanno provincia) ed addirittura chiese che all'interno di uno stesso comune che si trovano in diocesi diverse. In pratica è una suddivisione amministrativa diversa e che segue regole e territori diversi. Per fare un lavoro ancora più accurato bisognerebbe categorizzare le diocesi per regione ecclesiastica ma forse è ancora prematuro. Sarei comunque più sereno se sottoponessimo il quesito anche al mio guru per le categorizzazioni, ovvero DenghiùComm. :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 19:49, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
- Ti ringrazio per la fiducia :-) Giusto "per non pestarci i piedi" su che zone pensavi di lavorare? Io per un po' sono andato dove mi portava la curiosità ma ora tento di restare facendo la caccia prima per Churches in province of... e poi passando a setaccio direttamente i comuni di una provincia (dato che ho visto spesso caricano tutto senza fare alcuna sottocat, vedi il lavoraccio fatto con Category: La Spezia e certamente ancora da finire...). Dato che sono di Rovigo e ho caricato diverse foto fatte da me della mia provincia e dintorni, quindi diocesi di Adria-Rovigo, Padova e Chioggia, sono partito da quelle per andare verso il nord, almeno per (avere l'illusione di) finire il Veneto, ma posso andare tranquillamente altrove, Ferrara, Bologna, Ravenna... dimmi tu :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 20:01, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
- Aggiudicato: Belluno è tuo, io intanto do un'occhiata al modenese mentre intervallo caricando qualche nuova foto di oratori (e non solo) dei dintorni. Quando ritieni di aver terminato ci riaggiorniamo. Buon lavoro :-) PS: gran bel lavoro sulla Lombardia: se non ce le diamo tra noi queste piccola soddisfazioni... lavorare per la gloria va bene ma almeno che sia simpaticamente riconosciuta :-D--Threecharlie (talk) 20:13, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
WLM FR and WLM ES
[edit]Ciao,
I just see that you moved File:Catedral del Notre-Dame.jpg from WLM ES to WLM FR and add the « check » category. Thank you a lot.
On my side, I just moved File:Barcelone.jpg from WLM FR to WLM ES. But I don't which category add and how to use the {{BIC}} template. Could you help me or give me explanations ?
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:34, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
San Nicolás de Bari
[edit]Vaya, no lo sabía. El Monasterio del Santo Sepulcro debe ser mayor de lo que pensaba, porque están un tanto alejados el uno del otro. Ya lo he revertido. --ecelan (talk) 17:22, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished
[edit]Dear Cruccone,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. |
- Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:56, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
RE:Trasferimento immagini
[edit]Grazie per l'avviso, adesso vedo di mettere a posto le licenze, poi cerco di imparare a usare quel tool Baroc (talk) 14:25, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
File:Zollikon - Wappen - 001.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Perhelion (talk) 22:26, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
File:Oetwil am See - Wappen - 001.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Perhelion (talk) 22:41, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!Dear Cruccone, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, |
- Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 00:48, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Public Art about to take off!Dear Cruccone, Have a look at the lists of objects included, and of participating GLAMs in your country, and upload as many images as you can. Kind regards, |
- Message delivered by odderBot on 13:32, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.Dear Cruccone, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, |
Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!Dear Cruccone, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, |
File:Cambridge shield.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
CUInfringements (talk) 16:49, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Oetwil am See - Wappen - 001.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fränsmer (talk) 12:51, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Männedorf - Wappen - 001.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fränsmer (talk) 12:53, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze
[edit]Hallo Cruccone,
in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.
Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.
In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.
Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.
Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.
( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)
Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen
[edit]Hallo Cruccone,
nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.
Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.
Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.
Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.
( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)
Wiki Loves Monuments Spain 2016 is coming!Dear Cruccone, As every year, Wiki Loves Monuments in Spain, an international photographic contest about cultural heritage in the Spanish territory, will start on next September 1st. On behalf of the Wikipedia community and Wikimedia España (WM-ES), and as a participant in former editions of the event, or in other photographic contests organized by WM-ES, we'd like to encourage you to participate in the 2016 edition. We do know that you've been keen on contributing your work to the free knowledge in the past and therefore believe that you'll be glad to help us again. We want to inform you about a substantial change in the rules of the contest: this year only images of monuments or municipalities without previous photograph in Wikimedia Commons are accepted. To facilitate hunting monuments and municipalities without a free image, we have prepared a set of specific lists, which can be checked in the contest websites: wikilov.es/monuments or wikilm.es If you have comments, questions or suggestions about the contest, they are more than welcome. You can leave them here. We look forward to your free images! Sincerely, |
Carmine (Bergamo) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Themightyquill (talk) 14:45, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
File:Cambridge shield.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
GKFXtalk 13:47, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Scalea - panorama.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Scalea - panorama.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Scalea - panorama.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Smooth O (talk) 12:09, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
File:LGATasmania KingIs.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leyo 13:28, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments ti aspetta, con centinaia di nuovi comuni fotografabili
[edit]Gentile Cruccone, ti ringraziamo ancora una volta per la tua passata partecipazione a Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM). Il più grande concorso fotografico del mondo si svolge anche questo settembre per documentare e promuovere il patrimonio culturale italiano, con una licenza copyright libera.
Quest'anno è doppiamente facile partecipare: gli oggetti fotografabili coprono quasi 1000 comuni in più, grazie all'adesione di centinaia di nuovi enti fra cui Roma, e alla possibilità di fotografare circa 2000 alberi monumentali. Controlla le liste di monumenti fotografabili! Carica tutte le foto che hai e magari organizza una visita presso i monumenti che ancora non hanno una foto.
Quest'oggi il Parlamento europeo ha respinto la proposta di estendere la libertà di panorama. E allora scattiamo e pubblichiamo tutte le foto che possiamo, almeno per questi monumenti per cui ci è legalmente consentito!
Grazie, Nemo 16:03, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2019, è iniziato! Il tuo contributo è prezioso!
[edit]
Hi,
You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in Italy. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and upload your photos to share the italian cultural hertage with the world!!
You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments Italia website and here. If you have images taken in other countries you can check the international participants.
This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.
If you need help please contact me! --Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 13:24, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019
[edit]Bonjour,
Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !
Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !
Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.
Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.
P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !
Bonne journée,
Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
September är nästan slut: missa inte Wiki Loves Monuments 2019!
[edit]Hej,
Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare bidragit med bilder till den svenska deltävlingen av Wiki Loves Monuments, och jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också. Kategorierna är som vanligt byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer, och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september. Om du varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där.
Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 15:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Commons:Portale Comunità has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
109.118.116.192 00:10, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Commons:Portale Comunità has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
109.118.116.192 00:11, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Nu är det dags för Wiki Loves Monuments 2020!
[edit]Hej!
(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Sweden or other participating countries.)
Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare har deltagit i de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Monuments eller Wiki Loves Earth! För någon vecka sedan blev det klart vem som tog hem förstapriset i Wiki Loves Earth 2020 – stort grattis till Brydand100 och hans fotografi av Röttlefallet! Alla vinnare kan du se här – tack alla deltagare för fina bidrag!
Den 1 september inleds 2020 års svenska deltävling av Wiki Loves Monuments, där det skulle vara väldigt roligt om du ville vara med och delta! Målet med Wiki Loves Monuments är att fotografera svenska kulturarvsmonument. De kategorier som ingår är byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer – och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september.
Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Eric Luth (WMSE) (talk) 14:24, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !
[edit]Bonjour,
Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !
Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.
Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.
P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
File:Salgari - La capitana del Yucatan (page 67 crop).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
BrightRaven (talk) 14:55, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 12:31, 16 February 2022 (UTC)