User talk:Bissorte

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Bissorte!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:31, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gaston Monnerville par Jean-Paul Brunet 2013.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Gaston Monnerville par Jean-Paul Brunet 2013.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

Yours sincerely, KurodaSho (talk) 13:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pour en finir avec la repentance coloniale Daniel Lefeuvre 2006.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pour en finir avec la repentance coloniale Daniel Lefeuvre 2006.gif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

Yours sincerely, KurodaSho (talk) 13:55, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Église Primatiale Saint Jean à Lyon.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Église Primatiale Saint Jean à Lyon.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Église Primatiale Saint Jean à Lyon.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, KurodaSho (talk) 13:57, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jean-Paul Brunet portrait.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jean-Paul Brunet portrait.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Jean-Paul Brunet portrait.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yours sincerely, KurodaSho (talk) 03:23, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content

[edit]

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  polski  português  sicilianu  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  한국어  日本語  简体中文  繁體中文  עברית  العربية  +/−


Hello Bissorte, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Abbaye d'Hautecombe scriptorium.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:34, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pascal Boulanger, poète.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Austriantraveler (talk) 16:55, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:30, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Fabio Marra, Dans les chaussures d'un autre.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:27, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content

[edit]

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  polski  português  sicilianu  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  한국어  日本語  简体中文  繁體中文  עברית  العربية  +/−


Hello Bissorte, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:7,8 et 9 janvier - 13 novembre 2015.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yours sincerely, Alan (talk) 15:41, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:L'Enfer du Havre, Julien Guillemard, 1948.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Auteur décédé en 1960, pas encore libre de droits. Aussi :

Havang(nl) (talk) 13:04, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:L'Aurore, 29-30 avril 1950.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Havang(nl) (talk) 13:17, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Source et droits d'auteur

[edit]

Bonjour,

Si vous importez des documents dont vous n'êtes pas le seul créateur (ex: File:Auguste Bunoust (1888-1921), portrait.jpg), il ne faut pas dire que vous l'êtes (avec {{Own}}). Ces fichiers peuvent être supprimés si vous ne corrigez pas la source de vos documents. N'hésitez pas à me demander si vous avez besoin d'aide. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:59, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

En France, les droits d'auteur subsistent pendant 70 ans après la mort de l'auteur. Un document des années 1930 peut donc encore avoir des droits. Si l'auteur est anonyme, les droits subsistent pendant 70 ans après la publication, mais il faut montrer que l'auteur est vraiment anonyme (par exemple, en important le dos des cartes postales). Vous ne pouvez importer de documents publiés après 1945 que si vous avez une permission formelle de l'auteur et/ou de l'éditeur, sauf si le document est vraiement simple. Dans ce cas, utilisez {{PD-ineligible}}. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:41, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joseph-Charles Mardrus, portrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 14:07, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Le Cheval ailé, René Herval, 1966.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Yann (talk) 14:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Roland Mousnier (1907-1993), "La vénalité des offices sous Henri IV et Louis XIII", édition épuisée, 1971.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Yann (talk) 14:17, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 17:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Avertissement

[edit]

Bonjour, Merci de ne pas importer de nouveaux documents avant d'avoir corriger ceux listés ci-dessus. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 17:17, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

Que voulez-vous dire par "corriger", s'il vous plaît ? Et quelles sont les modalités pratiques pour corriger ?

Faut-il passer par "Copier une nouvelle version de ce fichier" ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bissorte (talk • contribs) 09:11, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cordialement.

--Bissorte (talk) 08:50, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Non, il faut corriger la description. Sur la page de chaque image, cliquez sur l'onglet "modifier". Si l'auteur est inconnu, ajoutez {{Unknown}} dans le champ Auteur. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 10:59, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

_____________

D'accord. J'ai également reçu une explication formulée par Havang (nl). J'ai commencé à modifier les fichiers selon ses instructions. Il ne m'avait pas dit, cependant, de mentionner unknown. Je vais l'ajouter.

Cordialement.

--Bissorte (talk) 11:03, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

__________

Voilà, j'ai corrigé les 120 fichiers en fonction des consignes. Cela est-il correct, s'il vous plaît ?

Cordialement.

--Bissorte (talk) 14:29, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Je vérifierais cela demain. regardez aussi Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Bissorte où d'autres utilisateurs essaient de corriger la description de vos fichiers. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:43, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Derri Berkani, "Une résistance oubliée. La Mosquée de Paris de 40 à 44", documentaire, 1991.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kopiersperre (talk) 11:01, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Bissorte: Il faudra adapter la licence du type self en PD-ineligible; puis pour la source (si c'est la source) donner http://etudescoloniales.canalblog.com/archives/2012/11/07/25527218.html et auteur:Mediateque des trois Mondes (selon le logo supprimé). --Havang(nl) (talk) 12:09, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

_________

Merci pour ces indications. J'ai corrigé.

Cordialement.

--Bissorte (talk) 12:20, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Source photo's Saint-Chamond

[edit]

@Bissorte: Il me semble que tu as pris pas mal de photo's concernant Saint-Chamond et ses environs du site http://saintchamond.canalblog.com/archives/2015/04/30/31983985.html , en ces cas il faudra mettre le lien et le nom du site comme source. À toi de le faire... oufff, encore du travail. --Havang(nl) (talk) 12:32, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

_____________

Corrigé. Merci.

Cordialement.

--Bissorte (talk) 14:06, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tu nous a donné beaucoup de puzzles à resoudre... j'y travaille depuis dimanche. À part cela, tes contributions sont sérieuses, même s'il y en a quelques-uns qui sont à supprimer. Pourras-tu les revisiter toutes pour source (lien web si c'est le cas), auteur, licence et en même temps t'exercer à mettre des categories...? --Havang(nl) (talk) 14:14, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

______________

Je suis en train de tout vérifier et de corriger là où j'ai appris que cela devait l'être. Merci.

Quelles contibutions seraient à supprimer ? Articles créés ? Contributions à des articles existants ? Je suis prêt à revoir ce que j'ai pu écrire ou publier, bien sûr.

--Bissorte (talk) 14:22, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saint-Chamond (Loire), Chapelle des Pénitents, en 1956, détruite en 1965.jpg

[edit]

Bonjour,

Au sujet du fichier :

File:Saint-Chamond (Loire), Chapelle des Pénitents, en 1956, détruite en 1965.jpg

J'ai retrouvé la source et modifié la description. Dites-moi, s'il vous plaît, si il est possible de demander une autorisation de publication au bulletin de la Diana (Montrbison, Loire) et selon quelle procédure ?

Cordialement.

--Bissorte (talk) 15:50, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, @Bissorte: , c'est plus vieux en fait, gallica mentionne la licence PD, donc on n'a pas besoin de l'autorisation d'un tiers. J'adapterai le fichier et je le renomme File:Saint-Chamond (Loire), Chapelle des Pénitents, détruite en 1965, ancienne carte postale.jpg

--Havang(nl) (talk) 16:43, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merci ! --Bissorte (talk) 16:50, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Rebonjour @Bissorte: , peux-tu remplacer {{Pd-ineligible}} par {{PD-self}} {{OTRS pending}} dans File:Daniel Lefeuvre 2007.jpg. --Havang(nl) (talk) 17:02, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

_________

Fait. Merci beaucoup.

--Bissorte (talk) 17:26, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

Carl Lindberg semble dire que ce fichier pose un problème...

http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5426290g/f67.image

BnF Gallica indique pourtant qu'il appartient au domaine public.

Cordialement.

--Bissorte (talk) 20:39, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pas vraiment un problème, il signale une signature pas encoree déchiffré, donc l'auteur n'est pas anonyme.
Un problème existe pour File:Plan École Pratique d'industrie de Saint-Chamond, 1929.jpg , la licence {{PD-old-70-1923}} est inadéquate pour deux raisons: il suppose publication avnt 1923 et le dessin est de 1929; les architectes de l'école ne me semblent pas des anonymes. Le fichier est peut-être à supprimer. --Havang(nl) (talk) 08:58, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour, D'accord. Pour File:Plan École Pratique d'industrie de Saint-Chamond, 1929.jpg, le fichier correct serait plutôt : {{PD-ineligible}} Qu'en pensez-vous ? Merci.--Bissorte (talk) 09:58, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Un dessin d'architecte a une valeur intellectuelle indéniable, est soumis à copyright, n'est pas ineligible, et ne tombe pas ainsi dans le domaine public. Il y a tellement de licences sur commons, même moi je suis loin de les connaitre toutes. --Havang(nl) (talk) 11:18, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Liste de licences

[edit]

Savez-vous où trouver une liste des licences Commons (à part les 6 licences libres qui ne conviennent pas à ce cas) ?

Cordialement. --Bissorte (talk) 11:30, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Il y a des centaines de modèles disponibles sur Commons (Commons:Copyright rules by territory). Ce qui est important ici, c'est de bien comprendre le droit particulier à un pays et un type d’œuvres. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 16:09, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • En France, et en général, en Europe, les droits d'auteur s'étendent jusqu'à 70 ans après la mort de l'auteur. Si l'auteur est mort depuis plus de 70 ans, il faut donc utiliser {{PD-old-70}}, ou {{PD-old-100}} si l'auteur est mort depuis plus de 100 ans.
  • Si l'auteur est une personne morale ou inconnu, il faut utiliser {{PD-anon-70}}.
  • Il faut aussi ajouter un modèle pour les droits aux Etats-Unis qui ne dépendent en général pas de la date de décès de l'auteur, mais de la date de publication : {{PD-1923}} si c'est avant 1923, {{PD-1996}} après. En plus les œuvres publiées en France après 1923 ne sont pas dans le domaine public aux Etats-Unis si l'auteur est mort après 1936 (voir COM:URAA pour ce cas particulier).
  • Si l'auteur n'est pas mort depuis plus de 70 ans, il faut son autorisation ou celle de ses ayants-droits.

Débuts sur commons

[edit]

Bonjour Bissorte. Je ne suis pas administrateur, mais je sais d'expérience que il n'est pas à priori évident comment utiliser commons; ainsi, j'aide parfois des débutants. Tu as fait un début rapide en télechargements, mais sans mettre l'info nécessaire dans les fichiers. Corriger après est vraiment chronophage. Normalement, pour les fichiers qui ne sont pas la propre création du télechargeur, Commons n'est pas chronophage, si les dates de publication, la source et l'auteur vérifiable ainsi qu'une ou plusieurs catégories sont donnés par le télechargeur. Il faudra pour l'avenir essayer d'avoir toute info prêt avant de commencer le télechargement, et de choisir une catégorie adéquate. Mais il te faudra surtout continuer sur wikipédia et commons. Amicalement --Havang(nl) (talk) 18:06, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Bissorte, les categories des fichiers sur commons sont ce que sont les liens internes sur wikipedia. SVP, essayez de les ajouter autant que possible. --Havang(nl) (talk) 10:53, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour, D'accord, mais où trouve-t-on les catégories au moment d'enregistrer le fichier ? Merci. --Bissorte (talk) 11:17, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Je viens de tenter l'opération... mais apparemment, je n'ai pas suivi la procédure adéquate. --Bissorte (talk) 11:26, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Rebonjour, Bissorte. D'abord: en général les categories sont en anglais et au pluriel, sauf les categories de noms propres. Il y a plusieurs possibilités d'ajouter la catégorie NN. (1) Pendant le télechargement par Special:UploadWizard, la boite categorie apparaît, à mettre NN. (2) Après le télechargement, on peut par le menu modifier ajouter la ligne de texte Category:NN. (3) En activant dans vos préférences (menu en haut de votre page) la fonction hotcat, qui permet d'utiliser les + et - dans la ligne des catégories en bas de la page, à mettre NN. (4) Si vous avez suffissamment d'expérience, vous pouvez activer dans vios préférences cat-a-lot qui permet de categoriser collectivement une série d'images.
Pour le choix d'une categorie, c'est une question de trial and error; important est de mettre le fichier dans la bonne arborescence, ensuite on peut préciser. Donc il faudra avant l'upload un peu étudier les arborescences: ascendante (exemple Category:writers from France =>parent categories: writers by country + people from France, Literature of France) et descendante (exemple: Category:Writers from France => subcategories: female writers from France, male writers from France, etc. Je viens de créer Category:Joseph-Charles Mardrus. Tu pourras raffiner en remplaçant Category:Writers from France par Category:Male writers from France et en ajoutant Category:Writers from France by name. Et si tu trouves cela adéquate, tu pourras ajouter ‎Category:Writers from Egypt. Tu pourras aussi descendre dans Category:Writers from France by century et choisir encore Category:20th-century writers from France. Je contrôlerai.--Havang(nl) (talk) 12:35, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Tu rigoles, en mettant NN comme category (ou tu es quelqu'un qui ne veut pas comprendre), bien sûr il faut mettre la catégorie concernée. --Havang(nl) (talk) 14:59, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Saint-Chamond, logo de la ville.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:48, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michel Pinault, historien des sciences, 1967-1968.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reventtalk 10:59, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert Fossier en 1948-1949, étudiant à l'École des Chartes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reventtalk 14:52, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michel Pinault, historien, 1967-1968.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reventtalk 14:59, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert Fossier en 1948-1949 à l'École des Chartes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reventtalk 15:23, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

demande utilisation image

[edit]

Bonjour Bissorte,

Je suis réalisatrice audiovisuelle (CNRS) pour un centre d'histoire sociale , à ce titre j'utilise beaucoup d'images (licences creativ commons, avec mention de la source) dans les films en ligne que je réalise pour ce centre de recherche (lien : http://chs.univ-paris1.fr/spip.php?article758). J'ai vu sur wikimedia votre photographie des jeunesses communistes de Hyères (1946) - très belle photographie.

Voyant que vous avez eu des obstacles au niveau de wikimedia pour intégrer d'autres photographies d'archives sur cette plate-forme, je m'adresse à vous pour savoir si vous disposez d'autres images d'archives (touchant notamment à l'histoire du PCF au sens large) pour les utiliser dans un petit film en préparation sur le sujet du livre suivant :

http://livre.fnac.com/a9729421/Paul-Boulland-Des-vies-en-rouge

Cordialement, jmenj — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmenj (talk • contribs) 10:26, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gabriel Chevallier, écrivain, article de presse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:05, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Roland Mousnier

[edit]

Bonjour, Bissorte.

Il me semble que cette image n'est pas libre de droits. En effet, il s'agit d'un portrait dessiné de Roland Mousnier : sait-on qui en est l'auteur ?

Cordialement. --Guise (talk) 13:56, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gérard Nicolas — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.102.75.165 (talk) 18:15, 04 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Didym (talk) 18:06, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monument aux morts de Château-Thierry, "Le linceul", Achille Jacopin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Havang(nl) (talk) 20:48, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roland Mousnier (1907-1993), historien.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 15:34, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jean-Paul Faivre, L'Expansion française dans le Pacifique (1953).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jean-Paul Faivre, L'Expansion française dans le Pacifique (1953).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:18, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lecteur d'archives (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

P 1 9 9   16:31, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Réponse : cette image est correctement renseignée (travail personnel). Son intérêt réside dans le fait de montrer la nature des archives qui sont souvent confondues avec des livres anciens dans des bibliothèques. Les archives sont des documents écrits sur des feuilles, par les administrations, la police, les entreprises, etc. Elles sont versées à des centres d'archives qui ont pour mission de les conserver, de les inventorier, de les ranger dans des cartons et de les communiquer au public. Sur cette image, on voit bien le carton, les dossiers et les feuilles qu'ils contiennent.

Bissorte

File:René Château, député, 1938.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish💬 09:53, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Julie d'Andurain, octobre 2016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 20:24, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Julie d'Andurain, 2016.jpg was recently deleted by Arthur Crbz for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: per nomination. Please send permission to OTRS.

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 20:44, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 15:47, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]