User talk:Baudouin d'Arras
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
--SieBot 12:54, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Source
[edit]Bonjour,
La plupart des images que tu as importées sont mal renseignées. Elle ne comportent pas de source correcte (par source on entend l'origine du fichier : d'où provient la photo ou la reproduction ?) et la licence PD-old apparaît souvent erronée (ce qui compte n'est pas la date de l'oeuvre mais la date de la reproduction : si la photo a été prise il y a 10 ans elle ne peut pas être dans le domaine public).
Merci de préciser ces points. Cordialement, Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 11:05, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Bonjour, même si on a pris nous-même la photo ? Baudouin d'Arras 23:52, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Il convient de préciser la source dans tous les cas :
- Si la photo a été prise sur Internet, il faut indiquer un lien exact vers le site. Attention, la plupart des images circulant sur Internet ne sont pas libres ou sont d'un statut douteux au vu de la licence PD-Art.
- Si la photo est un travail personnel, il faut bien sûr le préciser. La marge de manoeuvre est alors beaucoup plus importante, mais il faut néanmoins veiller à utiliser une licence adéquate (typiquement PD-self ou CC-BY-SA). Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 22:08, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- Il convient de préciser la source dans tous les cas :
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:30, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Hans_von_Seisser.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Kam Solusar (talk) 16:00, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Bonjour, Pourriez-vous s'il-vous-plaît préciser sur la page de description l'origine de la GFDL à propos de cette image, c'est-à-dire quelle est la personne qui réclame des droits d'auteur sur cette image et l'a placée sous GFDL ? La source que vous mentionnez ne semble pas faire ces mentions. Merci. -- Asclepias (talk) 01:10, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Hitler1924.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Emkaer (talk) 18:38, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
File:FidusInvocation.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Kam Solusar (talk) 18:16, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 05:38, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Couronnement de Louis IV.jpg is uncategorized since 4 April 2009.
- Image:Monnaie louis IV laon.jpg is uncategorized since 4 April 2009.
- Image:Herge2.jpg is uncategorized since 16 July 2009.
- Image:Etterbeeknat.jpg is uncategorized since 16 July 2009.
- Image:Otton III.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
File deletion warning
|
File:Mouzon portail.jpg has been marked as violating policy, because it is considered unfree. This file has been, or will be soon deleted. The file is licensed under a license that does not permit unlimited redistribution, commercial use or the creation of derivative works. Wikimedia Commons is a free media repository, which means that unlimited redistribution, commercial use and the creation of derivative work must be allowed. See Commons:Licensing for more information. If you want to ask permission from the author of the file, please do so using a template from Commons:Email templates. For images, you may find it useful to read Commons:Image casebook.
|
Martin H. (talk) 13:32, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jappalang (talk) 03:00, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Sceau de Robert II.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Sceau de Robert II.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sceau de Robert II.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Jappalang (talk) 03:02, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Etterbeeknat.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Túrelio (talk) 06:49, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
consécration de cluny III
[edit]Bonjour,
Je suis intéressée par la photo de la consécration de cluny III par URBAIN II que vous avez postée. Je ne comprends pas si vous êtes le photographe ou pas ? Comment avez vous eu cette reproduction, en êtes-vous l'auteur? comme dans la source c'est la BNF qui est mentionnée, je ne voudrais pas avoir de problème si je la diffuse : car la BNF vend ses photos. Je travaille dans le milieu universitaire et j'aurais besoin de cette image pour illustrer des recherches faites sur la vita odonis de Jean de Salerne. Merci de votre réponse, Cdt Patricia