User talk:Another Believer/Archive 13

Most memorable shot 2022 / Wikimania 2023

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I wish you a Happy New Year! As it has been our tradition at the beginning of the new year for a while, we're sharing our most memorable shots of the past year with each other. I invite you to share a picture that is particular meaningful to you and to describe why that's the case. Also, as Wikimania 2023 will be here before we know it (August 16 to 19), please consider adding your thoughts on our planning page, where we gather ideas for how we can make Commons photography more visible than in the years before.

All the best to you, your family, and friends! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! January 2023, Seattle - 050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! December 28, 2022, Seattle - 077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:58, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! January 2023, Seattle - 226.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:08, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 弘義閣 Beijing (November 2016) - 360 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:32, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beijing (November 2016) - 286.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 07:44, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle - February 2023 - 201.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 18:36, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, MX (2023) - 105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 21:13, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, MX (2023) - 092.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:23, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, MX (2023) - 108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:49, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, MX (2023) - 076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:44, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, MX (2023) - 078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 20:27, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco (February 2023) - 071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 20:39, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, March 2023 - 125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:29, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, March 2023 - 129.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:29, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco (February 2023) - 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:09, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

File:New York City, May 2014 - 040.JPG

Extended content

File:New York City, May 2014 - 040.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! User:Armbrust (Talk) 01:15, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, March 2023 - 134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:29, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco (February 2023) - 220.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:49, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, March 2023 - 119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, March 2023 - 128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:40, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! March 2023 in Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco - 092.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 19:08, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! March 2023 in Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco - 095.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:44, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, March 2023 - 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:46, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, March 2023 - 130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 23:56, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! March 2023 in Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco - 091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:55, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! March 2023 in Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco - 039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Not an outstanding quality., but really nice colours. --Der Angemeldete 12:06, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! March 2023 in Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco - 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:07, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, March 2023 - 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:52, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, March 2023 - 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:52, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! March 2023 in Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco - 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --痛 05:46, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! March 2023 in Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco - 093.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! March in Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco (2023) - 070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:04, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, March 2023 - 132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wee Hong 05:35, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico - March 2023 - 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 23:33, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta in February 2023 - 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 21:10, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico - March 2023 - 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Modern primat 13:26, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, March 2023 - 120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Modern primat 20:22, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malecón, Puerto Vallarta (2014) - 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Modern primat 20:22, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, MX (2023) - 077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 16:05, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! March 2023 in Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco - 112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Nice local color motif, but a very poor file description. --Palauenc05 10:00, 19 March 2023 (UTC) @Palauenc05: Description expanded. -Another Believer 13:42, 22 March 2023 (UTC)  Support --Palauenc05 21:08, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malecón, Puerto Vallarta (2014) - 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 14:56, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta - March 2023 - 063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico - March 2023 - 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:24, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta - Jalisco - March 2023 - 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:46, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta - Jalisco - March 2023 - 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:46, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta - Jalisco - March 2023 - 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:46, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta - Jalisco - March 2023 - 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:46, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta - March 2023 - 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:17, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta - March 2023 - 083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:47, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico - March 2023 - 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Why is the bottom cut off? --Der Angemeldete 23:40, 20 March 2023 (UTC) @Der Angemeldete: The photograph was taken closer to the statue to show more detail. -Another Believer 20:28, 28 March 2023 (UTC)  Support Thanks for clearing this up. I'll go for weak support. There is not one quality picture of this sculpture on commons and I can't really say something against composition decisions, but knowing your intention here, I'll have so say, sharpness and level of detail is close to the limits. --Der Angemeldete 20:52, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta - March 2023 - 073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Pi bot (talk) 07:06, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco, Mexico (March 2023) - 104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco, Mexico (March 2023) - 185.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Low detail in the backgrund but sharp and detailed main object. I'd rather go for promotion here. If there are any issues please discuss. --Der Angemeldete 11:54, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco, Mexico (March 2023) - 209.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 11:54, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta - Jalisco - March 2023 - 088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco, Mexico (March 2023) - 106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:22, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PV, Jalisco, Mexico (2021) - 310.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 08:51, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta - March 2023 - 064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Modern primat 13:03, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, in April 2023 - 155.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:13, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, in April 2023 - 108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:26, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, in April 2023 - 152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:54, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, in April 2023 - 154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, in April 2023 - 158.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:23, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, in April 2023 - 159.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:23, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, in April 2023 - 161.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:23, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, in April 2023 - 162.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:23, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, in April 2023 - 163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:23, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, in April 2023 - 109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:46, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Possibly need to discuss...

I meant to ping you with this edit but got your username wrong, sorry. - Jmabel ! talk 00:26, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

@Jmabel No worries! I'll defer to what you think is best. Happy editing! -Another Believer (talk) 00:28, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle metropolitan area, April 2023 - 144.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 17:31, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle metropolitan area, April 2023 - 149.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:52, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle metropolitan area, April 2023 - 154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:52, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle metropolitan area, April 2023 - 155.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:52, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle metropolitan area, April 2023 - 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vsatinet 15:52, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle, WA, in April 2023 - 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:18, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Extended content

Read this message in your language Dear Wikimedian, You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year. Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more. In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022. Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC. Click here to vote now! Thanks, the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:44, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle metropolitan area, April 2023 - 142.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Florstein 06:47, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle metropolitan area, April 2023 - 143.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Florstein 06:47, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

QI comments

@Poco a poco and XRay: Thanks for your comments over at QI. You two seem to think I should be smarter about my nominations and more willing to review nominations submitted by others. Some of my nominations have been rejected, and others are being discussed in the "Consensual review" section, so clearly I am still learning how to identify QIs. Please, there's no need to call me out for not being a better nominator or reviewer. I will continue to nominate images I think should be considered, but I'm not yet comfortable reviewing other nominations.

I hope you understand. Thanks! -Another Believer (talk) 14:28, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Everybody started once. Just dare. --XRay 💬 14:37, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

I concur with XRay, I'm definitely not calling you out. I just wish that you are more cautious with your noms. Some of them are far from QI and if you don't feel yet confortable and see that your images are not being promoted, you should focus on those images of yours that you believe are best. --Poco a poco (talk) 16:30, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

The many banners on this talk page suggest I'm at least partially able to identify quality images. -Another Believer (talk) 19:20, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Exception of COM:OVERCAT

Please don't remove categories like Revision of 761279626. It may be look like overcategorization, but it's an allowed and useful exception. You've created Category:Quality images of the Space Needle. The QI categories are a exception.. And: You forgot to set the template {{Collection of quality images}}. With this template qi categories are hidden. --XRay 💬 04:24, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

@XRay Thanks for the heads up! -Another Believer (talk) 04:25, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle metropolitan area, April 2023 - 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:51, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle in May 2023 - 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle in May 2023 - 044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:14, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle in May 2023 - 098.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:17, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Mural, Hollywood, Portland, Oregon (2014).JPG

Resolved

Extended content

File:Mural, Hollywood, Portland, Oregon (2014).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Santa Monica and Venice, CA (September 2022) - 303.jpg

Resolved

Extended content

File:Santa Monica and Venice, CA (September 2022) - 303.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! A1Cafel (talk) 10:26, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle - June 2023 - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:45, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Columbus, Ohio (2018) - 407.jpg

Resolved

Extended content

File:Columbus, Ohio (2018) - 407.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! A1Cafel (talk) 07:55, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Columbus, Ohio (2018) - 050.jpg

Resolved

Extended content

File:Columbus, Ohio (2018) - 050.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! A1Cafel (talk) 08:00, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Women's March on Portland - 71.jpg

Resolved

Extended content

File:Women's March on Portland - 71.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! SVG-image-maker (talk) 13:30, 13 July 2023 (UTC) A photo of a flag is problematic? Ridiculous... -Another Believer (talk) 13:34, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Commons photographers: next virtual meeting on August 5

Extended content

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group, I'm inviting you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, August 5th. We'll have two speakers: Poco a poco will provide us with an update on his underwater photography and George Oates from the Flickr Foundation will talk about the Flickr-to-Commons bridge (“Flickypedia”) that is currently in the works. If you're interested in attending, please sign up on this page: Virtual Meeting on August 5, 2023. I hope you're having a great time taking photos and I'm looking forward to seeing you on August 5th. All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:41, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Chicago, June 2015 - 012.jpg

Resolved

Extended content

File:Chicago, June 2015 - 012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:18, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Quick reminder: Commons Photographers meeting this Saturday

Extended content

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group, This is a quick reminder that our next meeting will happen on Saturday, August 5th. If you haven't registered yet and you're interested in learning more about underwater photography and “Flickypedia”, please sign up on this page. Also, I invite you to fill out this survey created by the people who are working on the Flickr-to-Wikimedia Commons software. Your input will make a difference. We haven't had a virtual meeting in a while and I'm so looking forward to this weekend! All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:15, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Graceland Cemetery, Chicago (2023) - 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 03:07, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Graceland Cemetery, Chicago (2023) - 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 18:01, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre Dame (2023) - 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chicago, Illinois, U.S. (2023) - 404.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 20:03, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chicago, Illinois, U.S. (2023) - 414.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 20:03, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Graceland Cemetery, Chicago (2023) - 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --多多123 21:25, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Salt Lake City, Utah (2021) - 100.jpg

Resolved

Extended content

File:Salt Lake City, Utah (2021) - 100.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Graceland Cemetery, Chicago (2023) - 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted. --多多123 21:25, 26 August 2023 (UTC) Done. Good quality now -- Spurzem 09:06, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Category:Miners Landing

Resolved

Extended content

How, if at all, does this differ from its parent category Category:Pier 57, Seattle, Washington? - Jmabel ! talk 01:06, 3 September 2023 (UTC) @Jmabel I see Miners Landing as a current tourist attraction on a pier with an extensive history and other features. Have I misunderstood? -Another Believer (talk) 01:11, 3 September 2023 (UTC) In the early 1970s they did a remodel of the pier shed (which dates from 1902) and put up a sign. I suppose there is a little bit of the pier outside the pier shed (now including, famously, the Seattle Great Wheel), and maybe you could say that "Miners Landing" is just the pier shed and the businesses inside, as against the pier itself, but I don't think there is any other Seattle pier where we separate out the pier shed as a distinct category, not even the ones like Pier 70 that have had two or more entirely distinct pier sheds in the history of the same pier. Heck, we don't even distinguish the many iterations of Colman Dock, which has referred to several entirely distinct piers and structures over the last 125 years or so. We do distinguish the Category:White Star Dock (which infamously sank into the floor of the bay after barely a year) from its successor Category:Pier 55, Seattle, Washington, we do distinguish Category:Galbraith Dock from Category:Pier 54, Seattle, Washington (which is really just a matter of era, maybe shouldn't be a separate category), and we certainly have categories for some individual businesses, etc. on the piers, but I'm pretty sure this is the only one where we have a distinct category for the pier shed (assuming that's what you mean it to be) and I don't see that pier shed as being any more or less historic (or more or less intact) than the four other remaining Gold Rush-era pier sheds on the Central Waterfront. - Jmabel ! talk 02:12, 3 September 2023 (UTC) I'm hoping to work this out with you sooner rather than later. Either we need to clearly define the scope of Category:Miners Landing or we need to upmerge it. Either is acceptable to me. - Jmabel ! talk 19:47, 3 September 2023 (UTC) @Jmabel You seem more worried about this than me. I see Miners Landing as part of the pier, hence the subcategory. If you disagree feel free to take some sort of action. Thanks! -Another Believer (talk) 19:54, 3 September 2023 (UTC) So: the pier shed and everything inside it, at any time since the early 1970s renovation? Or some other definition? I'm OK with having the category, as long as we can say what it does or doesn't cover. - Jmabel ! talk 20:22, 3 September 2023 (UTC) @Jmabel Sure? This archived site says, "Miners Landing is the home of The Crab Pot, Fishermans Restaurant, Pirates Plunder, and many more shops and restaurants. We are located on Seattle's Historic Waterfront on Pier 57." -Another Believer (talk) 20:25, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chicago, Illinois, U.S. (2023) - 332.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle - September 2, 2023 - 67.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:25, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle - September 2, 2023 - 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 22:51, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle - September 2, 2023 - 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 04:04, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle - September 2, 2023 - 68.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:10, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, in April 2023 - 105 (crop).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:46, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Commons Photographers User Group: Board Elections 2023

Extended content

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group, in preparation of the 2023 board election of our group, we invite you to take a look at the following page: Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2023 and provide feedback. The timeline for the 2023 election will be September 15 – September 30: Applications for the election committee October 1 – October 9: Vote for election committee (ideally comprised of three members) October 10: Election committee starts work October 20 – November 9: Nomination phase for candidacies November 10 – December 10: Elections December 15: Results announced In the first step we ask you to be part of the election committe. Please add your name on the Election Page. We are very much looking forward to hearing from you. Please use this talk page for your thoughts. All the best --Ailura (talk) for the CPUG board

File:Chinatown, NYC (2014) - 04.JPG

Resolved

Extended content

File:Chinatown, NYC (2014) - 04.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! A1Cafel (talk) 04:35, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Sculpture at Shinjuku i-land in Tokyo, 2019 - 220.jpg

Resolved

Extended content

File:Sculpture at Shinjuku i-land in Tokyo, 2019 - 220.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! A1Cafel (talk) 10:01, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle metro, September 2023 - 081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:23, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bainbridge Island, February 2023 - 63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 03:30, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bainbridge Island, February 2023 - 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 03:30, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle, October 6, 2023 - 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 21:25, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Seattle, October 6, 2023 - 57.jpg

Resolved

Extended content

File:Seattle, October 6, 2023 - 57.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:01, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle, October 6, 2023 - 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Undoubtedly a violation of the architect's copyright. There is no commercial freedom of panorama in the U.S. -- Ikan Kekek 02:57, 13 October 2023 (UTC) My mistake: yes there is for buildings.  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 04:21, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bainbridge Island, February 2023 - 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Sharpness not the best, but acceptable. --XRay 03:01, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bainbridge Island, February 2023 - 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:12, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bainbridge Island, February 2023 - 82.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:12, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Mural, Woodstock, Portland, Oregon.JPG

Resolved

Extended content

File:Mural, Woodstock, Portland, Oregon.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Nectar Cafe, Hollywood, Portland, Oregon (2014) - 1.JPG

Resolved

Extended content

File:Nectar Cafe, Hollywood, Portland, Oregon (2014) - 1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blumenauer Bridge (August 3, 2022) - 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good picture, but please change the file name to something meaningful. --Plozessor 03:36, 22 October 2023 (UTC) @Plozessor: I've submitted a move request. -Another Believer 05:42, 22 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:03, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blumenauer Bridge (August 3, 2022) - 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good picture, but please change the file name to something meaningful. --Plozessor 03:36, 22 October 2023 (UTC) @Plozessor: I've submitted a move request. -Another Believer 05:42, 22 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:03, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta in February 2023 - 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:42, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta in February 2023 - 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:42, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bainbridge Island, February 2023 - 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 11:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Doric Lodge, Fremont, Seattle (2014).jpg

Resolved

Extended content

File:Doric Lodge, Fremont, Seattle (2014).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Georgetown, Seattle (2016) - 06.jpg

Resolved

Extended content

File:Georgetown, Seattle (2016) - 06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Georgetown, Seattle (2016) - 09.jpg

Resolved

Extended content

File:Georgetown, Seattle (2016) - 09.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! World Trade Center, Portland, Oregon (July 2023) - 065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good picture but needs a more specific filename. --Plozessor 11:13, 26 October 2023 (UTC) @Plozessor: I've submitted a move request. -Another Believer 16:21, 29 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:35, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! March in Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco (2023) - 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok. --Sebring12Hrs 13:39, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle in October 2023 - 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok for QI --Jakubhal 04:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle in October 2023 - 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Picture is good, probably rename the file to something more specific. --Plozessor 05:42, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle in October 2023 - 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Picture is good, probably rename the file to something more specific. --Plozessor 05:42, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bainbridge Island, February 2023 - 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 14:00, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Commons Photographers User Group: Board Elections 2023 - Nomination Phase

Extended content

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group, the 2023 board election of our group is run at Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2023. The next steps in the timeline for the 2023 election are October 20 – November 16: Nomination phase for candidacies November 17 – December 10: Elections December 16: Results announced If you are interested in being a member of the board, please nominate yourself on the Election Page. We are very much looking forward to hearing from you. Please use this talk page for your thoughts. All the best --Ailura (talk) for the CPUG board

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco, Mexico (March 2023) - 112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:41, 7 November 2023 (UTC)  Comment Very painterly, and probably one of the best photos I've seen from you, but what are the spots above the big tree? -- Ikan Kekek 08:53, 9 November 2023 (UTC) Thanks! My guess is birds in the distance. -Another Believer 17:47, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle in October 2023 - 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:15, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toronto, November 10, 2023 - 142.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:50, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle, WA, in November 2023 - 069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 18:15, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle, WA, in November 2023 - 076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ThibautRe 18:31, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toronto, November 10, 2023 - 146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:39, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toronto, November 10, 2023 - 137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:04, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toronto, November 10, 2023 - 145.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:13, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toronto, November 12, 2023 - 187.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 10:19, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Megaptera sculpture, Toronto, November 10, 2023 - 203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Picture is ok but please fix the filename. --Plozessor 08:08, 19 November 2023 (UTC) @Plozessor: I've submitted a move request. Another Believer 10:00, 19 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 13:36, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toronto, November 12, 2023 - 205.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Sandro Halank 12:58, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toronto, November 13, 2023 - 050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 13:48, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toronto, November 10, 2023 - 139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok for a QI --Jakubhal 05:29, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toronto, November 12, 2023 - 201.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:15, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toronto, November 10, 2023 - 140.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Sunny365days 10:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toronto, November 11, 2023 - 112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sammandi 06:10, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Flickypedia soft launch and a huge thank you

Dear fellow Commons photographer,

I hope this message finds you well. As you might already know, the Flickr Foundation has been busy creating a new Flickr-to-Commons bridge (“Flickypedia”) this year. After a successful demo at the GLAM Wiki Conference in Montevideo, the Flickr Foundation team is now inviting all members of the Commons Photographers User Group to be the first to review their alpha, reporting any technical issues or other feedback via the Flickypedia project talk page.

At the same time, this message is an opportunity for me to thank you for your trust and support over the past couple of years. Since 2017, we've grown into being one of the largest user groups in the Wikimedia universe. I've tremendously enjoyed interacting with all of our members when it came to joint photowalks at Wikimanias, virtual Zoom meetings where we covered a wide variety of photography topics, as well as our annual “Most memorable shot of the year”, among many other events. As I'm not running for an official position in our current board election, this will be my last message on behalf of the user group to you. Thanks for all the happy moments we shared together over the years! I hope you'll continue creating free images for the millions of people we serve through Wikipedia and Commons.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:36, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Neighborhoods and parks in Seattle

Your input would be appreciated on Commons:Categories for discussion/2023/12/Category:Seward Park, Seattle, Washington. Thanks. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 15:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Participation in North American Hub research

Hello, Another Believer ! I'm writing on behalf of the North American hub research committee to see if you would be interested in participating in a one hour focus group. During the session, we will discuss how a potential hub could support Commons contributors by providing services such as professional development and grant support. Our research phase is ending very soon (12/31). I apologize for the short notice. If there's any chance you can join us for a meeting on 12/20 @ 1pm ET, please respond to Ariel.Cetrone at wikidc.org. Thanks for considering -Ariel Cetrone (WMDC) (talk) 18:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

		* Happy Holidays! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:17, 22 December 2023 (UTC)