User talk:Acroterion/Archive 1

Maginot Maps

Thank you for your warning! You are right, the selected license was not correct. The license must be CC-by-nc-nd to fit with cartomaginot.org.
I hope you will agree with me... In that case, I will modify all licenses Borvan53 (talk) 23:36, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
PS: what do you wish to do on the Maginot Line? Perhaps we could help each other?

From what I see, ND or NC licenses are not acceptable on Commons, so I'm not sure that changing the license will work.

I've been working on a series of articles on wiki-en on the Maginot ouvrages; additions or improvements would be welcome. More pictures, and especially diagrams and maps, but so far I haven't found any that are freely usable, and haven't the time to make my own. Acroterion (talk) 02:58, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

I am discussing with the webmaster about this point. I already have his aknowledgement to use the maps on wikipédia (see the forum). The CC-by-nc-nd licence deals with the DWG files. I am now discussing about the use of screen captures of these maps. Borvan53 (talk) 12:06, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

The webmaster clearly confirmed that screen captures of the maps, as I did them, can be freely used on Wikipedia. The CC-by-nc-nd licence protects only the DWG files. You can check it on the forum of cartomaginot.org (discussion entitledwikipedia between jeannot -it's me- and the webmaster).

Borvan53 (talk) 20:23, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Excellent; I'm glad you were able to get that cleared up directly with the webmaster. It was obviously their intention to make it freely available in some form, and now we have the technicalities out of the way and can use the captures you've provided. Thanks for all you help! Acroterion (talk) 19:52, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

In reading the conversation at cartomaginot.com, it appears that the webmaster is referring to French Wikipedia standards; they appear to be correctly quoting the Wikimedia policy on project-related standards. Commons has more stringent standards, as that text notes, and what would be acceptable on the French Wikipedia is not necessarily on Commons. It appears that the webmaster is not distinguishing between the French Wikipedia and Commons. See [[1]]. Acroterion (talk) 00:42, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Acroterion!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

• Image:Saint Mary Ranger Station GNP2.jpg was uncategorized on 1 November 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Battle Monument MD1.jpg was uncategorized on 29 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:37, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lamar Valley bison YNP1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments fine --Pudelek 17:10, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

--:bdk: 18:10, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the nom, glad you liked it! Acroterion (talk) 04:01, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Noisy pictures

Hi there Acroterion! You're welcome! Such a nice pic shouldn't lose the nomination because of an easy to fix problem. Well, first of all using low ISO speeds could help, just in case you already don't. But in pos-processing there are several methods that can be used. [2] This link explains really good the various methods one could use. I sometimes use the Camera Raw option to reduce noise in Photoshop. But when it is too messy, like in the picture of yours, no offense haha, I use the program NeatImage. Of what I've heard and of my experience it's the best way to reduce noise without affecting the image so drastically, you can see the results ;) Hey and nice picture, I would someday like to visit Yellowstone, it looks incredible! --Gaendalf (talk) 03:51, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, I've seen Neatimage; I'll give it a try. The image was shot at ISO 200, which shouldn't be a problem, but it apparently is for this particular camera. I ran it through Camera Raw, so the fault is with the sensor rather than the processing. I highly recommend Yellowstone, although it was quite crowded last September. Acroterion (talk) 04:00, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Opal Pool YNP2 filtered noise.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Opal Pool YNP2 filtered noise.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:04, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Opal pool

You're welcome! It was an excellent pic! --Gaendalf (talk) 03:36, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

I've installed NeatImage and have been cleaning up a few files that might be suitable for QI and FP. It definitely helps. Acroterion (talk) 03:44, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

IP 85.132.27.130

Salam. Mən və User:Vugar 1981 və digər bəzi iş yoldaşlarımız eyni IP-dən istifadə edirik. EnVikidə Vugar 1981-nin bloklanması nəticəsində bizim IP-də bloklanmışdır. Sizdən blokun götürülməsini xahiş edirəm. Və yaxud da mənə Ipblock-exempt istifadəçi hüququ verməyinizi xahiş edirəm. Təşəkkürlər! Hörmətlə, Cekli829 (talk) 08:36, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Your photo Sawtooth Valley ID1.jpg is now a featured picture. I nominated this photo because I think it is an excellent quality image that represents a place, Galena Summit, where many people first see the Sawtooths and it goes well with the recent improvements I have made to Wikipedia:Sawtooth National Forest. Thanks for uploading the picture. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 21:26, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for nominating it! I had no idea it was at FP. For my part, it was the first time I'd laid eyes on the Sawtooth Valley; I was deeply impressed. Acroterion (talk) 22:35, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

I also listed File:Sawtooth Range ID1.jpg as a quality image candidate, but there was objection over a dust spot in the upper left of the photo. If you're interested, I'm sure it would be promoted if you could remove this spot. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 02:08, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll fix it once the power is back and I can use Photoshop on the main computer again: we had a series of severe thunderstorms last night and we're on generator power. My present camera has some dust on the sensor that I can usually work around: I'm going to order a new camera next week, then clean the sensor on the old camera. Acroterion (talk) 02:39, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Brow Monument NRHP documentation

thanks for the compliment - i feel like some old guy who started out the race and by the end, about 50 other people were carrying me over the finish line. this is an interesting process, to say the least. I packed up all of the correspondence regarding the NR pdfs and sent it to the person you suggested. i truly appreciate your help. (and everyone's) bpolkAbearfellow (talk) 20:26, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

You're completely welcome. Ideally, that's how it should work: somebody starts something worthwhile and others pitch in to help. After all, the interface and environment aren't exactly easy to master ... If you have any questions, let me know (you're more likely to get a fast response on Wikipedia page rather than here). Acroterion (talk) 20:53, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rufus Wilson Complex MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good subject but the file seems overprocessed. Other opinions are needed. --JLPC 23:15, 12 October 2012 (UTC) Scaled back, see comments on image talk. Acroterion 18:04, 13 October 2012 (UTC) There’s a strange texture in the sky and visible noise all over the building, maybe a little more NR could help. --Kreuzschnabel 17:03, 14 October 2012 (UTC) Light noise reduction applied. Acroterion 23:45, 14 October 2012 (UTC) QI for me. --Kreuzschnabel 04:36, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oregon Caves Chateau OR1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --JLPC 09:47, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glacier Park Lodge Lobby MT1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --JLPC 08:37, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golden Gate YNP1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 05:26, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Acroterion, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 17:06, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tatoosh Range WA MRNP1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:08, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Best Farm small house MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Spot is still there. --Iifar 20:40, 17 November 2012 (UTC) *  Support Fixed spot ;-) --Smial 17:57, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:43, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States

Dear Acroterion,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States. The images you uploaded will help illustrate Wikipedia articles on historic sites in the United States. We are delighted to share the winning images and our top 10 finalists with you.

Click here to read our press release and view the winning submissions »

We invite you to continue uploading images to Wikimedia Commons and we hope you will return for Wiki Loves Monuments again in September 2014. For more information about Wikimedia Commons, please visit our welcome page. For more information about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, please click here. Once again, thank you for sharing your images and participating in our contest.

—

User:Mono

Organizing Team

Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Acroterion, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Jefferson FL11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Kraft 23:57, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! USS Wisconsin Norfolk VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good! --High Contrast 15:20, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! McMurray-Frizzell-Aldridge Farm MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 15:57, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hopewell MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:51, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Jefferson FL14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:34, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Acroterion, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Departures Magazine - Request for Image Use

To Whom It May Concern,

I hope this message finds you well. I am contacting you from the photo department of Departures Magazine. We are a luxury lifestyle magazine exclusive to American Express platinum and Centurion card holders. We have a circulation of 1.2 million in the United States.

We are currently working on a piece about the Wolfsonian for our upcoming October issue and came across your photo of the museum in the midst of photo research. I am wondering if the image is available for use? I would like to discuss possibly using your image in this issue and it would be great if you could e-mail me at the address below by today or tomorrow as we are on an extremely tight deadline.

I would leave my phone number but this is a public post I presume – if you e-mail me I will provide you with my full contact information and you can call me with any questions you may have. Let me know and thanks so much in advance!

Best,
Alex Friedlander
departuresmagphoto@gmail.com

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beaver Stadium Penn State PA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 04:20, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Richmond Federal Appeals Court and skyline VA2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:09, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Richmond Federal Appeals Court and skyline VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:09, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Great Auditorium Ocean Grove NJ1A.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:26, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Croton Dam NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:59, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cottages Ocean Grove NJ1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:48, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinbach building Asbury Park NJ1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Greetings from Bruce Springsteen. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:14, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Howard Johnson's Asbury Park NJ1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:12, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ocean Grove tent cabins NJ1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 11:15, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asbury Park Conventiuon Center NJ2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Something is wrong in the sky, see my notes. --Cccefalon 04:04, 7 April 2016 (UTC) I think contrast adjustment introduced blotchiness in the sky, adjusted workflow for smooth gradient. Acroterion 02:05, 9 April 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:55, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Town Hall West Portal NJ1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:26, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Occean City beach and pier MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Esthetics at its best. Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:38, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Observation tower Dewey Beach DE1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colony Farm Wawarsing NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Indian River Inlet Bridge DE1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Golden Gate YNP1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Golden Gate YNP1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! N70GA Bucket of Bolts MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:06, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! N529B Fifi MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --DarwIn 16:51, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! N529B Fifi MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --DarwIn 16:52, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fairchild Packet 45-57814 MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 21:42, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! N529B Fifi MD4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clover Hill Tavern Appomattox VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 16:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Appomattox barn VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:37, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woodson law office Appomattox VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please remove CAs, check the branches. --Basotxerri 20:09, 10 October 2016 (UTC) Purple fringing found in corner and fixed --Acroterion 00:01, 11 October 2016 (UTC) OK now, thank you! Nice office, btw. --Basotxerri 15:04, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pride of Baltimore II MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The Pride makes us proud. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:49, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sultana Pride of Baltimore II MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI, even when it´s a bit noisy --Hubertl 02:59, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigsbee MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice photo, but I see at least 2 dust spots which should be fixed before promotion: One is to the left of the upper part of the mast, the other in the sky some ways to the right of the lower middle or so of that same mast. I figure the much smaller spots are probably birds, so those are fine. Otherwise, a quality picture. -- Ikan Kekek 04:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC) Dust spots and distant bird removed - thanks! Acroterion 14:37, 29 October 2016 (UTC) Very good quality now, and conceivably a featurable picture, though I'm unsure whether it would get the votes if nominated. I might see some very light dust spots near the top margin toward the left side, so check and see if you find any. -- Ikan Kekek 09:18, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perri Lee MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:40, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Hampton buy boat MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:40, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sultana MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 03:40, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catboat MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 04:10, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalmar Nyckel mainmast MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:12, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigsbee MD4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:32, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elsworth Chester River MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:37, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TWA Flight Center 2015 NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:13, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TWA Flight Center 2015 NY3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:14, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antietam observation tower MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:17, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NC8407 Ford 4-AT Tri-Motor MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wow! Never sat in a cockpit before. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:05, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mid-Hudson Bridge night NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:51, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sherrick Farm MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:11, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TWA Flight Center 2015 NY4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:09, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NC8407 Ford 4-AT Tri-Motor MD13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 06:00, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:NC8407 Ford 4-AT Tri-Motor MD1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:NC8407 Ford 4-AT Tri-Motor MD1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Acroterion,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:41, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manhattan Bridge NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:34, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NYPD boat East River NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 02:15, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brooklyn Heights Promenade NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 21:52, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brooklyn Historical Society NY2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 19:16, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brooklyn Historical Society NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 19:12, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Intrepid and west side Manhattan skyline NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London Terrace NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:57, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triborough lift bridge NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manhattan Psychiatric Center NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Midtown Manhattan from the East River NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:57, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Floatplane East River NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:25, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Williamsburg Bridge NY2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 05:13, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Williamsburg Bridge NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:49, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Starrett Lehigh Building NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check for dust spots, I found 2 of them (see note) --Uoaei1 03:59, 24 July 2017 (UTC) Dust spots found and fixed, thanks! Acroterion 12:25, 24 July 2017 (UTC)  Done Good quality. --Uoaei1 17:46, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Willis Avenue Bridge NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:34, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spuyten Duyvil Bridge NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:41, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FDNY boat East River NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 03:01, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1 North Fourth complex NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 02:32, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Queensboro-59th Street Bridge NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:38, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Avenue Bridge NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please make verticals straight, they are leaning --Uoaei1 04:01, 26 July 2017 (UTC) Both towers now straight up and down. Acroterion 01:34, 27 July 2017 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:53, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wards Island Bridge NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs some perspective correction and a bit of crop on the right side wouldn't hurt so that the line of the bridge meets the corner, see note. Think you could do that? --W.carter 08:55, 26 July 2017 (UTC) Sure, PC and crop adjustments made, thanks. Acroterion 01:50, 27 July 2017 (UTC) Thanks! Very nice! Good quality. --W.carter 12:16, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Highline and IAC Building NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But please add geo location. --XRay 04:28, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Floatplane East River NY2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:58, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NYBG Conservatory NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:12, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Finlandia ships

Hei, Acroterion!
Lue B. How to name the category Category:Ships by name hei-hei,--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 23:33, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

7.If there are several ships with the same name built in the same year, the place where the ship was built/location of the shipyard is added: "<name of ship> (ship, <year>, <place>)". Sample: "Mistral (ship, 1999, Saint-Nazaire)" as there are several Mistral (ship, 1999). --PjotrMahh1 (talk) 23:41, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, that had me puzzled. Thanks for cleaning up after me! Acroterion (talk) 02:31, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mid-Hudson Bridge night NY2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit dark but good quality --Podzemnik 01:34, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Withdrawing FPC

When you withdraw an FPC, please don't just write that ion the nom and remove the now from the list. Place the {{withdraw}} template on the nom and sign it. The nom will then be closed and archived. I have fixed this for you with this nom ([3] [4]), but please remember this in the future. All the best, --Cart (talk) 12:27, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for cleaning up after me, I appreciate your help. Acroterion (talk) 16:12, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad NHP VC2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 04:37, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tug Evening Light and Barge 264 Hudson NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 01:38, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tug Evening Light Hudson NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 01:30, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assateague Light interior VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Only very slightly noisy at 300% of my laptop screen, more noticeably noisy at full size, but I think it's acceptable for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 04:36, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chilhowee Dam NC3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:19, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad NHP VC3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:57, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petrified wood Theodore Roosevelt NP ND1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:33, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peaceful Valley Ranch Theodore Roosevelt NP ND1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oxbow overlook Theodore Roosevelt NP north unit ND3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:15, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jim Gatchell Museum WY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:15, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oxbow overlook Theodore Roosevelt NP north unit ND1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:05, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scenic drive Theodore Roosevelt NP north unit ND2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 19:52, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prairie dog Theodore Roosevelt NP ND1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syed07 13:32, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bison Theodore Roosevelt NP ND1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 16:15, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murie Ranch WY2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 12:58, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teepee Fountain Thermopolis WY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:01, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Central Teton range WY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:15, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thermopolis terraces WY3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:15, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peaceful Valley Ranch Theodore Roosevelt NP ND3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:16, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roaring Mountain YNP4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 02:20, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Togwotee Pass WY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Lovely. --Seven Pandas 01:14, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ocean City beach and pier MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:02, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! C-47 N62CC Virginia Ann FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! C-47 "Miss Virginia" 0-30665 N47E engine FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:55, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! C-47 "Miss Virginia" 0-30665 N47E FDK MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:50, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! C-47 N62CC Virginia Ann FDK MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:55, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NC33611 DC-3 Tabitha Mae FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:55, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! C-47 "Miss Virginia" 0-30665 N47E FDK MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 224064 C-47 Placid Lassie FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:55, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! C-47 N47SJ Betsy's Biscuit Bomber FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:50, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North Platte River bowstring truss bridge WY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:01, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North Platte River bowstring truss bridge WY2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:01, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pilatus PC-12NG N834NG FDK MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice sunrays. --Aldnonymous 03:12, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! N178FA Cirrus Vision SF50 FDK MD1A.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Quite dramatic, and good quality, IMO, but I expect this to go to CR and possibly be voted down because the blown area of the sky distracts from the plane, which people will say is the only legitimate subject. I don't agree. I think "View of Plane with Sun Peeking from behind Dark Clouds" is a fine idea for a picture. -- Ikan Kekek 07:34, 11 May 2019 (UTC)  Support Nice timing for the sunrays. --Aldnonymous 17:54, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Laramie NHS WY3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 03:07, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoopers Island Bridge MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 03:07, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stewart AFB SAGE center NY2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 03:07, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chesapeake Bay Bridge at Sandy Point MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok imo. --ArildV 09:02, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Digging dog Delaware seashore DE1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:34, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manitowoc crane DE1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:34, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assateague rabbit MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:12, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assateague laughing gull MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. I'm not sure if the gull's laughing though. I'd prefer more neutral description :) --Podzemnik 02:12, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assateague pony and foal MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:12, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delaware Seashore State Park DE1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:31, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Indian River Lifesaving Station DE1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:31, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Indian River Inlet Bridge DE5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:03, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assateague naturalist shack MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:06, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sinepuxent Bay Assateague MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:37, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grain elevator Snow Hill MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:57, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assateague MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:57, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lucy the Elephant NJ2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:30, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lucy the Elephant NJ3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:51, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! One WTC NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A little bit grainy in the sky. --XRay 04:34, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lucy the Elephant NJ4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 02:53, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paramount Theater Asbury Park Convention Hall NJ1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 02:53, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cheney bldg Huson River State Hospital NY2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. ----

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cheney bldg Hudson River State Hospital NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. ----

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lucy the Elephant NJ10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 02:52, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Fix the typo in File:Cheney_bldg_Huson_River_State_Hospital_NY2.jpg, though. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:36, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val-Kill winter NY2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:48, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Appomattox barn VA2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 02:01, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frederick E Patrick St MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 02:01, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View east from Clingman's Dome GSMNP NC1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:01, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dan Lawson place GSMNP TN1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:28, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pennsylvaia Memorial vaulting PA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:06, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slave quarters Appomattox VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction of verticals required --Uoaei1 04:01, 10 September 2019 (UTC)  Done Perspective and crop adjusted. Acroterion 17:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:59, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cades Cove fire GSMNP TN1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 07:51, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sharp Top VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO the photograph is too dark, especially the trees. --XRay 02:58, 11 September 2019 (UTC)  Done Adjusted up level in the trees that the sun had not yet reached as far as I dare. Acroterion 01:38, 12 September 2019 (UTC)  Support A little bit noisy, but acceptable. --XRay 05:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Industrial building Johnstown PA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The building is leaning in. Please fix the perspective. --XRay 02:56, 11 September 2019 (UTC)  Done Adjusted perspective a little more. Acroterion 01:38, 12 September 2019 (UTC)  Support A little bit oversharpened, but acceptable. --XRay 05:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miller Farm Antietam MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Satdeep Gill 03:15, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Hancock, Gateway National Recreation Area, New Jersey, USA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:38, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stone Cottage Val-Kill NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:38, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Hancock officer housing NJ1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Pretty stuff. GQ --Podzemnik 03:01, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pack Horse Ford WV2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kennedy Farm MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pry House MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you check your tilt please? I think it needs some rotation clockwise. --Podzemnik 03:57, 23 September 2019 (UTC) Rotated and a little more perspective adjustment, thanks ~~~~  Support Not perfectly vertical but better, thanks --Podzemnik 05:49, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pry barn Antietam MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I don't want to pixel peep but there is a big dust spot in the middle of the wall that is in the shade + probably some leftoverw from cloning on the top right. Otherwise both images are high end QI. --Podzemnik 03:57, 23 September 2019 (UTC) Both fixed, thanks Acroterion 00:35, 24 September 2019 (UTC)  Support Thanks --Podzemnik 05:49, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! John F. Kennedy grave Arlington VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Geo tag would be useful --Podzemnik 03:05, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sequoia sempervirens in Jedediah Smith Redwoods State Park.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:45, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Little Missouri in Theodore Roosevelt NP ND1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:01, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Atomic City, Idaho.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear Acroterion,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear Acroterion,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:21, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martinsburg roundhouse WV2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 14:17, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States 2020 – Last day to enter!

This user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2020}} to your userpage!

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Hi there! Kevin from Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States here. I know it's been a tough year for everyone, and I hope this message finds you well.

You are receiving this message as a participant in last year's Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in the United States. First, a recap: We concluded with over 5,200 great photos of U.S. historical sites made possible by contributors like you. If you haven't yet seen, last year's U.S. winners are viewable here, and the international winners here (including multiple from the United States!).

Second, as you may have seen from the banner notices on Wikipedia, this year's Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in the United States has been running through October instead of September in consideration of the pandemic and the hectic start of the fall season. Despite the challenges of the year, we're thrilled that the United States has surpassed 5,000 photo contributions so far.

October 31st is the last day to upload photos for the U.S. competition this year. If you've already contributed, thank you so much - and it's great to have you again this year! If you haven't yet contributed but are interested in participating again, you're invited to join us during these last couple days. Check out the United States event page for more information. Remember that you are welcome to upload and submit photos of historic sites that you've taken any time in the past, not just this month.

As always, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments! If you'd like to respond to this message directly, please do so on on my talk page. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 07:20, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Federal CH and PO Martinsburg WV2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:14, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Third Haven Meeting House MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs a little perspective correction to improve the verticals. --Augustgeyler 11:37, 29 October 2020 (UTC) Perspective adjusted. The building in real life is not entirely plumb. -- Acroterion 01:04, 30 October 2020 (UTC)  Support improved! --Augustgeyler 10:25, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burkittsville MD5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:17, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Acroterion,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Farthing's Ordinary St. Mary's City MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brunswick Heritage Museum MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, funny optical illusions --Michielverbeek 23:25, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Knutti Hall Shepherd University WV1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Raytheon microwave oven on the NS Savannah

Hi Acroterion,

We love to use your image of Raytheon microwave oven on the NS Savannah, Baltimore, Maryland in our upcoming educational textbook.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:NS_Savannah_microwave_oven_MD8.jpg

Can you reach out to me via email — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.118.123.105 (talk) 17:00, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 71-73 Baltimore Street Cumberland MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 01:54, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barbara Fritchie House MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gettysburg Seminary PA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Small clockwise tilt. --Tagooty 02:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC) Tilt fixed, thanks. Acroterion 02:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC)  Thank you. There is some white CA along the left edges of the spire, dome and roof edges. Is this fixable? --Tagooty 15:16, 12 April 2021 (UTC) I'll see what I can do Acroterion 16:40, 12 April 2021 (UTC) Blue/bronze CA at the top reduced, can't do much with the white fringe, but it takes 400% enlargement to see it clearly. Acroterion 02:06, 13 April 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality --Tagooty 03:11, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gettysburg Seminary PA2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander Novikov 16:14, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grumman TBM Avenger wing unfold sequence 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A nice occasion to nominate 5 images that look almost the same. Good quality. --Nefronus 19:35, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grumman TBM Avenger wing unfold sequence 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A nice occasion to nominate 5 images that look almost the same. Good quality. --Nefronus 19:35, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grumman TBM Avenger wing unfold sequence 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A nice occasion to nominate 5 images that look almost the same. Good quality. --Nefronus 19:35, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grumman TBM Avenger wing unfold sequence 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A nice occasion to nominate 5 images that look almost the same. Good quality. --Nefronus 19:35, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grumman TBM Avenger wing unfold sequence 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A nice occasion to nominate 5 images that look almost the same. Good quality. --Nefronus 19:35, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bombardier CL-60 N605TK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:28, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TBM Avenger MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:31, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TBM Avenger MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:35, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TBM Avenger MD5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:59, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cessna Citation V N563TM FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embraer Phenom 300 N235EE FDK MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alumnae Hall Hood College MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shultz House Gettysburg PA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 119 E Patrick St Freerick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:58, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zion Lutheran Church Middletown MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:00, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Union Knitting Mills Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:05, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coffman Chapel Hood College MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zion Lutheran Church Middletown MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:59, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Middletown Memorial & Town Hall MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 121 E Patrick St Freerick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI after adding a catogory about the subct (a house) --Poco a poco 12:15, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Middleway Masonic Hall WV2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Some minor CAs at the leaves in the top-right corner. --Aristeas 06:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cessna Citation 525B N357N FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 02:43, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delaplaine Center window MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 02:43, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alumnae Hall Hood College MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check the verticals. Thank you. --XRay 05:12, 2 October 2021 (UTC) Vertical fixed, thanks. Acroterion 19:48, 2 October 2021 (UTC) The edge of the house on the right leans to the left and so do the columns. (Columns are narrower at the top than at the bottom.) --XRay 05:44, 3 October 2021 (UTC) Adjusted a little more - Ionic columns taper mostly in the top portion - Acroterion 00:48, 4 October 2021 (UTC) Sorry. The edge of the house isn't vertical. There is a white edge top left and a touch of CAs too. So please check it again. (It's all fixable and the photograph could be QI.) --XRay 08:54, 4 October 2021 (UTC) Adjusted, commented on your talkpage a litle more - thanks. Acroterion 01:41, 5 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. Thank you for your patience. --XRay 05:20, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macombs Dam Bridge tower New York NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Avenue Bridge tower NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triboro Bridge lift span tower NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:31, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window washer Brooklyn Heights NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 241-247 E. Church St Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:55, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Broadway Bridge tower NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:32, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Starrett-Lehigh Building NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:57, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 104-106-108 N Bentz St Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:57, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States 2021

Hello! Last year you contributed to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in the United States. Thanks to people like you, it was a great success with over 1,000 people contributing almost 6,000 photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the country. Hundreds of these photos now help illustrate Wikipedia articles, improving our open knowledge about United States history, culture, and heritage. If you haven't seen the winners yet, be sure to check them out here.

I'm pleased to say that we're back this year with Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in the United States through the month of October, and I'd like to welcome you to participate once again in the event. Check out our updated event page for more information.

Once again, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and we hope to see you again in this year's event! If you'd like to respond to this message directly, please do so on on my talk page. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 21:19, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

OK. 107.146.244.150 00:22, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sultana at Cambridge MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Graham-Whitelock house at the Adkins Historical Museum complex MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:19, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wicomico River at Salisbury MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 01:16, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sultana at Cambridge MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice clouds. --King of Hearts 01:16, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nathan of Dorchester Cambridge MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:49, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! John Deere 6155M tractor MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:55, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oliver 77 tractor MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oliver 66 tractor MD4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Can you please unblock me from Wikipedia early?

Can you please unblock me from Wikipedia early? Why? Because I don't want to wait. I remember and am aware that you blocked me from Wikipedia.... until you changed it with 6 months. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/107.146.244.150 . Note that I will do helpful edits, and because I don't want to wait until February 3, 2022, because it is one year, I will do helpful edits. I am 14 years old and have started high school now. I am sorry for what I did in August, and I NEED to create an account. That's the thing. 107.146.244.150 00:21, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

One big problem with my block is that the other family members that live in my house, can not create an account. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 107.146.244.150 (talk) 02:01, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

No. You can wait until you’re old enough to understand why such arguments are harmful to your case. Acroterion (talk) 02:28, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

OK. I am 14 years old now, since my 15th birthday is on October 14, 2022. When I do come back to Wikipedia, I will put "I'm back from my block." on my talk page, then do one or two edits, then create a new account, and I am not telling anyone else in my family except for my dad (I did yesterday). I now have other accounts on many other wikis. That's the thing. 107.146.244.150 02:39, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piaggio P180 Avanti FDK MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:48, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

What time does my Wikipedia block expire?

What time does my Wikipedia block expire? Now it will expire on 23:48, 3 February 2022. 107.146.244.150 08:08, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houses on Cornhill St Annapolis MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:28, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annapolis Post Office MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Categorization could be better. --XRay 05:19, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maryland Inn MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:29, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shop at Cornhill and Fleet Streets Annapolis MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 09:36, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 30 Fleet St Annapolis MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, but it looks like perspective correction is needed to make window panes appear rectangular (specialy on the door and lower window). --Velvet 08:29, 12 February 2022 (UTC) Adjusted a little - few things about these houses are square, but the door is probably trustable. Acroterion 19:42, 12 February 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Better, although you might still correct a bit on the left side. --Velvet 08:30, 13 February 2022 (UTC) The house to the left leans even more, it is just they way it is. See File:Leaning houses Fleet St Annapolis MD1.jpg

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boeing CH-47Fs landing FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:31, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Category:53752 (aircraft)

Hi, I don't know if you are familiar with USAF serial numbers, but 53752 is not correct, even if displayed on the tail fin. There were some nine different aircraft with the serial 53-752, as the USAF normally only displays the fiscal year when the aircraft was ordered, in this case (19)53 and the last three digits of the serial number, in this case (1)752. The full serial number of this North American F-100C-1-NA Super Sabre is 53-1752. Therefore, I would recommend to use the full serial numbers to avoid duplication and confusion. Thank you and cheers Cobatfor (talk) 14:50, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Sounds good to me, thanks. Acroterion (talk) 01:53, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MSP Trooper 3 AW139 N382MD MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Some information about the location would be nice. --XRay 04:29, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MSP Trooper 3 AW139 N382MD MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 10:03, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MSP Trooper 3 AW139 N382MD MD4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 10:11, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embraer Legacy 450 N429FX FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Wingtip is a bit obscured by the other aircraft, a shift of shooting position would have been ideal. Lovely contrast of the storm clouds and sun on the ground. --Tagooty 02:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC) Thanks, I have other shots with better angles, but no sunshine. Sun wins. Acroterion 03:13, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferguson 40 tractor MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 05:07, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bombardier Global 5000 N399JA FDK MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality, good composition und beautiful colors: excellent -- Spurzem 16:48, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! USAF HH-60W 19-14499 FDK MD5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:27, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fedex Airbus A300F4-600 N722FD BWI MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:43, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frontier Airlines Airbus A320neo N389FR BWI MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:43, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embraer Legacy 550 N856JG BWI MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:38, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Massey-Harris GP 4WD tractor VA4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:40, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minneapolis 17-30 tractor VA3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:26, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huber 32-45 tractor VA3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:22, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minneapolis 30-50 tractor VA3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rumely Oil-Pull 25-45 tractor VA2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:37, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Case 12-20 tractor VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 23:37, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huber 25-50 tractor VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 23:37, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Case 22-45 tractor VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:31, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Case 22-45 tractor VA3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:31, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huber Super 4 Crossmotor tractor VA3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:36, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minneapolis 35-50 tractor VA5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 07:34, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rumely Oil-Pull 25-45 tractor VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 06:33, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gray 22-40 tractor VA6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gray 22-40 tractor VA7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:42, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! International 10-20 Titan tractor VA2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:42, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avery 25-50 tractor VA4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:42, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lauson 20-40 tractor VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:35, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheppard SDG-3 orchard tractor VA4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:35, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avery 25-50 tractor VA6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:35, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Farmall Regular VA4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:31, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Farmall B tractor VA3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:31, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Farmall B tractor VA6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:31, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Farmall B tractor VA5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huber road grader VA2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! McCormick-Deering 10-20 tractor VA2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:37, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! John Deere GP tractor VA9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:37, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minneapolis-Moline R tractor VA7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:37, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sikorsky S-61 N906CH FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:30, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caterpillar D6 bulldozer VA2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oliver Hart-Parr Row Crop tractor VA4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:27, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silver King R-38 tractor VA2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:39, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silver King R-38 tractor VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:39, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minneapolis-Moline RTS tractor VA4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:39, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scolia dubia on goldenrod MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:39, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caterpillar D6 bulldozer engine VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Michael32710 13:46, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Case SC tractor and mower VA2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:39, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scolia dubia on goldenrod MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 06:40, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Farmall F-12 tractor with saw VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:29, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allis-Chalmers U tractor VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:09, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Massey-Harris 55 tractor VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:10, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! McCormick-Deering 10-20 tractor VA5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:17, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Federal truck VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:29, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thymelicus lineola on aster MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:02, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thymelicus lineola on aster MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. --Tagooty 03:02, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! McCormick-Deering WA-40 tractor VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:07, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Case CC tractor VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:07, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Case CC tractor VA3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:07, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Case threshing machine VA2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 04:49, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Threshing machine VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:28, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Threshing machine VA5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baker 25-50 tractor VA2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Case 22-45 tractor VA2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:57, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cleveland General tractor VA2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:57, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huber 32-45 tractor VA2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:57, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moline Universal tractor VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:18, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minneapolis-Moline R tractor VA8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:18, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! McCormick-Deering 22-36 tractor VA2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:18, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Massey-Harris GP 4WD tractor VA3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:20, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Powell Hall Bishop Clagett Center MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Please add the geo location. --XRay 04:02, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! John Brown's Fort Harpers Ferry WV2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. GPS?--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! John Brown's Fort Harpers Ferry WV1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 05:59, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lewistown fish hatchery MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:37, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trinity Chapel Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:21, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Evangelical Reformed Church belfry Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:21, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trinity Chapel Frederick MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:21, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grace Rocky Hill Lutheran Church Woodsboro MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please fix the CAs (at the cross). --XRay 03:32, 10 October 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:46, 10 October 2022 (UTC) Orange CA removed. Acroterion 01:38, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eagles Club Frederick MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fulton House McConnellsburg PA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:32, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christ Reformed Church Shepherdstown WV1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --XRay 03:32, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cedar Grove Christian Church Dott PA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But please improve the categorization. --XRay 03:13, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lippold Double House Cumberland MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But please improve the categorization. --XRay 03:13, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 17-15 Prospect Square Cumberland MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 02:42, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allegany County Library MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 02:42, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allegany County Courthouse MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 02:59, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spires and Winchester Hall Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 11:06, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johnnie's Motel sign McConnellsburg PA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:32, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utica covered bridge MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:27, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loch Raven Reservoir MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:29, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Todd's Inheritance MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:29, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gulfstream V N111 FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:09, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MSP Trooper 1 AW139 N384MD MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 02:28, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! International Titan 10-20 tractor MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:33, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Farmall Hydro 100 tractor MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:22, 23 October 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:24, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Farmall Super C tractor MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:22, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! International 340 Utility tractor MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:33, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Farmall 1066 Hydro tractor MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:42, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! C&O Canal NHP visitor center MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:16, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! C&O Canal NHP visitor center MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:43, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vindobona maple MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:12, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vindobona Hotel lane MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:12, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vindobona maple MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Lovely colours and composition. --Tagooty 01:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beechcraft T-34B 140733 N2VY FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A "Personality rights" template would be good to add. --Tagooty 02:38, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Record Street ginkgo MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:32, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 119 W. 2nd St. Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:12, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Mary's Catholic Church Petersville MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-17 W. 3rd St. Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:31, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 434 N. Market St. Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:31, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! All Saints Episcopal parish house MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:22, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! All Saints Episcopal parish house MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Record Street Home Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gingkgo and swing MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ginkgo and fence MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:22, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Junior Fire Co. No. 2 Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 03:25, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frederick City Hall MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:23, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! All Saints Episcopal parish house MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:23, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rose Hill Manor MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ross and Mathias houses Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 325 327 329 N. Bentz St. Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 323 325 327 N. Bentz St. Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harris Farmhouse Walkersville MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:15, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harris Farm barn Walkersville MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:09, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 315 317 319 N. Bentz St. Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:15, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 122 120 118 S. Market St. Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 04:52, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 106 S. Market St. Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:13, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ginkgo biloba Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:59, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 101 E. 3rd St. Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Pity about the overhead cables in front of these historic buildings. --Tagooty 02:22, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 100 N Court St Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 45-47 E. 3rd St. Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:22, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dassault Falcon 2000EX N500RR FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Nice contrast of the sunlight and dark storm clouds! --Tagooty 03:33, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Joseph's Catholic Church Emmitsburg MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:26, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Joseph's Catholic Church Emmitsburg MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:26, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seton shrine and basilica Emmitsburg MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:26, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 306 W. Main St. Emmitsburg MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:20, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Incarnation United Church of Christ Emmitsburg MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:24, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 115 E. Main St. Emmitsburg MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:24, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elias Lutheran Church Emmitsburg MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:16, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elias Lutheran Church Emmitsburg MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:16, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 105 E. Main St. Emmitsburg MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:16, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carroll Street freight depot Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The depot is tilted CW. --Tagooty 03:33, 17 November 2022 (UTC) Fixed --Acroterion 01:38, 18 November 2022 (UTC) It is now tilted CCW. Also may have vertical PC issue. --Tagooty 02:43, 18 November 2022 (UTC) Redone from scratch. Some of the railing posts, the chimney and the power line lean. The building might lean a little too, but I've oriented vertical around that. --Acroterion 02:29, 19 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality, thanks --Tagooty 14:52, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beall-Air WV1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:15, 31 December 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:16, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beall-Air WV2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:35, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anthony Hall Harpers Ferry WV1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Categorization could be better. --XRay 04:34, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brackett House Harpers Ferry WV1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Categorization could be better. --XRay 04:34, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lower High St Harpers Ferry WV1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Categorization could be better. --XRay 04:34, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antietam field MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:42, 1 January 2023 (UTC) Very good and large resolution. Maybe a good FPC nominee; not positive about that. -- Ikan Kekek 09:19, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Public Way Harpers Ferry WV1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:04, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lower High St Harpers Ferry WV2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 30 High Street Harpers Ferry WV1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! B&O Potomac crossing WV1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harpers Ferry bridge tunnel Maryland Heights WV1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:27, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Churchill Street Baltimore MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tug Baltimore MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:57, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Domino Sugar refinery Baltimore MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:32, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Black bear skull 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:33, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dassault Falcon 7X N73KT FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:46, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dassault Falcon 7X N73KT FDK MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:46, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dassault Falcon 7X N73KT FDK MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:46, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dassault Falcon 7X N73KT FDK MD4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:08, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catoctin Mountain and farm MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:26, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Aircraft category

Hi, you have created several aircraft category with only one category like this one. But normally aircraft cat has minimum three cat like this. Please create the aircraft category with minimum of three cat, so that its easily locatable. Afifa Afrin (talk) 06:05, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

It seems to me that "Aircraft by registration" is a parent category of the other two. However, I'll see if ,ore categories can be added. Acroterion (talk) 12:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoya carnosa 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:08, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoya carnosa buds 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:08, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! E-2B 152476 Patuxent River Naval Air Museum MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:00, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grumman C-2A Greyhound Pa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 342 East Church Street Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:54, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! All Saints Episcopal parish house MD4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:49, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clustered Spires High-wheel bicycle race 2023 MD7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:39, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clustered Spires High-wheel bicycle race 2023 MD6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:55, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beechcraft Super King Air 350 N68RF FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:15, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clustered Spires High-wheel bicycle race 2023 MD12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qulity --Michielverbeek 03:41, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell-Boeing MV-22B 168339 HMX-1 FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell-Boeing MV-22B 168339 HMX-1 FDK MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 03:06, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell-Boeing MV-22B 168339 HMX-1 FDK MD4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sikorsky VH-3D 159359 HMX-1 FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 22:47, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sikorsky VH-3D 159355 HMX-1 FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp photo of a possible historical moment, but the left crop irritates me. IMO more crops would improve the composition, especially at the right border --Michielverbeek 07:40, 19 August 2023 (UTC) You think it should be tighter, or are you looking for a view with the entire rotor on the left? Acroterion 12:14, 19 August 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality IMO. --多多123 17:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	The way your photos capture sunlight, and shadows... I marveled at your work. Thank you. The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 00:27, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambassador Theater Baltimore MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 02:10, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 228 N Market St Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:07, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States 2023

Hello! In 2021, you contributed to Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States. Thanks to people like you, it was a great success with over 500 people contributing over 5,500 photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the country. Hundreds of these photos now help illustrate Wikipedia articles, improving our open knowledge about United States history, culture, and heritage. You can see the top-ten winners of the US competition here.

While the United States did not participate in Wiki Loves Monuments in 2022, I'm pleased to say that we're back for 2023 through the month of October! I'd like to welcome you to participate once again in the event. Check out our 2023 event page for more information.

Once again, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2021, and we hope to see you again in this year's event! If you have any questions, please leave them on the event talk page.

Thanks, ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 09:12, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Noon formation Bancroft Hall USNA MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is fine but I miss a category related to military --Poco a poco 06:55, 14 October 2023 (UTC) Categories expanded. Acroterion 12:45, 14 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Thanks, QI --Poco a poco 20:28, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 131 E High St Carlisle PA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:45, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 131 E High St Carlisle PA2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:45, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cumberland County Prison PA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:45, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New York State Monument Antietam NB MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:16, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumma Farm Antietam NB MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:16, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumma Cemetery Antietam NB MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:16, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumma Cemetery Antietam NB MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:16, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! John Coblentz Farm MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:22, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! John Coblentz Farm MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:22, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! John Coblentz Farm MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A little bit noisy in the sky, but acceptable. --XRay 04:04, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! John Coblentz Farm and Middletown Valley MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:02, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Terrace Lanes Frederick MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:02, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 October 2023 (UTC)