User talk:柴田バネッサ
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 04:00, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:O0491064014722119431.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:O0491064014722119431.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:O0491064014722119431.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
— Marchjuly (talk) 22:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Pretty much all cover art (e.g. book, album, software) is going to be considered to be protected by copyright unless it can be clearly shown otherwise as explained here. If you self-published this work and thus own the copyirght on it, then you should follow the instructions in the above notification and very your copyright ownership. If you don't own the copyirght on this cover imagery, then you can't claim is as your "own work" even if you own a physical copy of the work itself. In that case, you will need to follow the instructions given here. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:44, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hi. I authored the book and you can see my name on the book and it's stated so in the article. The publisher Nan Undo and I used the copy right free photos, so there should be no problem to use the photo. If I need to add some references, I'll do so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 柴田バネッサ (talk • contribs) 07:18, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- I saw the name on the book, but neither Wikipedia nor Commons has any way to verify that the person who uploaded the file (i.e. you) and the person who wrote the book are one and the same. If you're the same person and want to use your real name as your username, then that's OK; however, you might want to take a look at en:WP:REALNAME and en:WP:REALWORLD to see what risks there might be in doing so. If you have no concerns about people connecting your Wikipedia or Commons editing with who you are out in the real world, then you might want to consider having you account verified by sending an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org or permissions-en@wikimedia.org explaining that you're editing under your real name. You should use some kind of official email address (if you have one) when doing so to aid in the verification process. The information you put in the email won't be made public, but it will allow a VRT volunteer to add a template to your user pages to let others know you are who you say you are. This could help other editors avoid mistaking you for impersonating yourself. I'm not a VRT volunteer, but you can find some at COM:ON or en:WP:VRTN if you want to ask questions. Just remember though that anything you post on Wikipedia or Commons is publically viewable; so, you might want to try email for really personal details. As for the book cover, if you're the copyright holder, you can upload it to Commons under a free license like you did. However, you should realize that you need to be the sole copyright holder because you will need the COM:CONSENT of the publishing company as well if they also hold the copyright. You also need to understand that by uploading the cover art to Commons, you're basically agree in advance to allow anyone anywhere in the world to download it at any time and re-use it for any purpose. Commons doesn't accept any type of licenses that place restrictions on commercial reuse or derivative reuse; the best that you can ask for is that the cover art be attributed to you and the other copyright holders. You will still hold the original copyright on the cover, but others will be able to freely use the version you upload to Commons pretty much as they want would out needing to contact you. So, if this sounds like something you don't want to do, I suggest you go to the file's page, click on the "Challenge speedy deletion" button and request that the file be deleted. If you're not concerned about such things, then follow the instructions given in the notification above and email your COM:CONSENT to Wikimedia VRT. As for the images you used for the cover, the fact that they are public domain means it's OK for you to use them; however, the cover is almost certainly eligible for copyright protection in its own right as a COM:DW which means a more formal verification of copyright ownership is needed.One last thing about this file is that you should probably request a filename change per COM:RENAME if you decide you want it to stay on Commons. The current filename is too ambiguous and should be changed to something more descriptive. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:50, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hi. I authored the book and you can see my name on the book and it's stated so in the article. The publisher Nan Undo and I used the copy right free photos, so there should be no problem to use the photo. If I need to add some references, I'll do so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 柴田バネッサ (talk • contribs) 07:18, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:IgamonoYuishogaki.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:IgamonoYuishogaki.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
-- Marchjuly (talk) 02:26, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- When you take a photo of someone else's creative work, there's a good chance that there are two copyirghts which need to be considered as explained in COM:DW. Unless it can be shown that the original work has been released under a free license accepted by Commons or is within the public domain for some reason, Commons will not be able to keep the file. Please also take a look at COM:2D copying because in many cases a new copyirght is not going to be generated if you simply create a wikt:slavish reproduction of a non-copyrightable or no-longer coprightable work created by another person. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:39, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hi. Thank you, I took the photo of the original document in the National Archives of Japan Digital Archives. It's marked as in the public domain.
- https://www.digital.archives.go.jp/file/1234730.html
- https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/deed.ja
- I'see if I can add this info in the photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 柴田バネッサ (talk • contribs) 07:39, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- If the original document is PD and was created by someone else, then it's technically not your "own work". It might not be a huge deal in this case, but you should try and avoid claiming stuff you didn't create as your own as much as possible. Moreover, if you basically just photographed a page from the book, then it's unlikely that you photo itself is eligible for copyright protection as explained in COM:2D copying. So, the more information you can add about the original work to the file's description, the better. I'm not exactly sure which copyright license would best apply to the original work per COM:Japan, but you can ask about this at COM:VPC if you want and someone should be able to help sort that out. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:54, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Kokudosho.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Kokudosho.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kokudosho.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
-- Marchjuly (talk) 02:30, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- The COM:EXIF data for this photo indicates that it comes from Facebook. If you took the photo and uploaded to Facebook prior to you uploading it too Commons, then that's OK; however, some sort of formal verification should be made as explained here unless you are able to provide a link to the Facebook page showing the image and showing it's been released under an acceptable license. If you didn't take the photo yourself, then you need to follow the instructions given in COM:VRT#If you are NOT the copyirght holder and get the COM:CONSENT of the person who did for Commons to keep the file. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:33, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- Please note that the above also applies to File:MinistryofTrasport.jpg, File:KUISexchangestudents.jpg, File:American school Japan Culture Day.jpg, File:AusieRugby.jpg, File:Sagamiredbrick.jpg, File:Tabatastatopm.jpg, File:Ninja Matsuri.jpg becaue each of these also have EXIF data indicating that they come from Facebook. If you're going to upload lots of personal photos such as this, you might consider following the advice given in item 4 of COM:VRT#Licensing images: when do I contact VRT? and send one email for all of these as well as for the rest of your file uploads of your own photographs so as to make it clear to others that you understand and agree to COM:L, COM:LRV and COM:CONSENT. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:54, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hi. Thank you for the instruction. All of the photos were taken by myself. Some Wiki editors thought it's better to delete the entire gallery. So I don't think I use any of the photos you mentioned in your message. In case I can add a gallery, I'll upload them again following the instruction you indicated to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 柴田バネッサ (talk • contribs) 07:28, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- If you want to use photos that you've taken but previously uploaded to Facebook, then that's OK. Facebook, however, seems to somehow modify the COM:EXIF data of files that are uploaded to it (you should Google that for more deatils), which means that the original EXIF data contained in the photo when upload is no longer there when the file is subsequently downloaded from Facebook. Generally, it's better (whenever possible) to upload your photos with the original EXIF data intact because that can help in verifying the copyright status of the photo; so, if you've still got these photos on your camera, then you can just reupload the original versions of them. Otherwise, you're probably going to either need to send a COM:CONSENT email in to Wikimedia VRT or add a link to the file's description which show exactly where it came from and exactly how it's been licensed. Facebook's general licensing is not completely compatible with COM:L which may mean that you have to add something to the Facebook post stating the the type of license you're releasing the photo under. Some media hosting sites like Flickr and YouTube allow you to choose a license for your file uploads, but I don't believe Facebook does; so, you have to add the information after the fact. Moreover, if you gave your photos to someone else to upload to their Facebook page, then they're probably going to need to attribute the photo to you and add the licensing info to the photo for this type of verification to work. One last thing about your file uploads, I didn't go through and check them all, but you should go back and look them over and try to clarify anything that needs clarifying based on the few I did check. Do just assume that everything you uploaded is automatically your "own work" particularly if you're photographing something created by someone else. You can find some general information at COM:CB, but you might want to ask specific questions at COM:VPC. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:11, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:AusieRugby.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:AusieRugby.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:AusieRugby.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
-- Marchjuly (talk) 02:46, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi. I took the photo. But I have written in, I'm not going to have a gallery, so this can be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 柴田バネッサ (talk • contribs) 07:31, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:KUISexchangestudents.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:KUISexchangestudents.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:KUISexchangestudents.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Marchjuly.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 02:47, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi. I took the photo. But I have written in, I'm not going to have a gallery, so this can be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 柴田バネッサ (talk • contribs) 07:31, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Please sign your postings
[edit]As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
--SignBot (talk) 07:33, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Please sign your postings
[edit]As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
--SignBot (talk) 07:41, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
File copyright status
[edit]Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. --Yann (talk) 07:54, 11 September 2021 (UTC)