User talk:Сергей 6662

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Сергей 6662!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:18, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Biktop.024.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:40, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Mealing stone and mano.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Mealing stone and mano.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:51, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:The diggers in Adygea.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:The diggers in Adygea.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:53, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chief Crazy Horse.jpg

Give a proof that your request is right - or please let it be. Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:33, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes:

http://www.american-tribes.com/Lakota/BIO/LittleBigMan.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Big_Man
Photo: "Little Big Men. Photo from U.S. Signal Corps" // "Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee" by Dee Brown. Picador. Pan Books Ltd. London. 1970 ISBN 0-330-24569-4.

Сергей 6662 22:05, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Native American = USA

Please stop. Category:Native American canoes refers to Native American canoes in the United States, so it's in Category:Native American culture (USA-only). Category:Native North American canoes (which should be renamed) refers to Indigenous canoes from North America, so it's NOT a sub-category of Category:Native American culture (USA-only). - Themightyquill (talk) 12:23, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What!? What the United States? These categories relate to the Indians, not the United States. Let me work. And what fool put the Caribbean to North America? Does geography confused? --Сергей 6662 12:59, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

You're clearly misunderstand the terminology, and if you persist, I'll need to mark it as vandalism. As for Caribbean, please read en:Caribbean before you accuse anyone else of being a fool. - Themightyquill (talk) 10:31, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have already joined the Caribbean to North America? Smartly. Then, and South America will connect. --Сергей 6662 10:58, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Category:Other_birch_bark_canoes

Category:Other_birch_bark_canoes has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indigenous peoples of North America by name

I just reverted a number of your edits removing categories from Category:Indigenous peoples of North America by name. Please explain your edits so I can understand your intention. Thanks. - Themightyquill (talk) 09:54, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why put the people of Mesoamerica to the North American Indians? They have their own, distinct culture and history. For them there is its own category. --Сергей 6662 12:45, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Each Indigenous people of North America has its own distinct culture and history. If they are being categorized my continent, those from Mexico belong in the category for North America. - Themightyquill (talk) 21:05, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Сергей 6662, please stop edit warring. I have tried to engage with you to discuss why your categorization does not match with the existing categorization scheme, and why it's inappropriate. I have encouraged you to stop creating new categories until you can understand how categorization works at commons. Instead, you have twice emptied and deleted my categories, and continued to create awkward new categories that don't match the existing tree. Please reconsider your actions and continue discussion before making further edits. Thank you. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:56, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Trees are not my concern. I see that Wikimedia Commons is in chaos. So trying to bring that to scientific notation. If you don't want it, I spit and leave. --Сергей 6662 12:06, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Vandalism warning

العربية ∙ বাংলা ∙ čeština ∙ словѣньскъ / ⰔⰎⰑⰂⰡⰐⰠⰔⰍⰟ ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ македонски ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tok Pisin ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

You have vandalized the content of Wikimedia Commons. Please stop. If you continue making inappropriate edits you may be blocked from editing Commons. You may test freely in the sandbox.

Emptying others' categories without consensus is disruptive vandalism. Please don't do it. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 15:22, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Кто тут занимается вандализмом!? Сами ничего не понимаете и мешаете работать другим. Можете заблокировать меня и убрать мой аккаунт. --Сергей 6662 15:46, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Round tower, 1884.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stolbovsky (talk) 15:45, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warning for repeated vandalism

বাংলা ∙ čeština ∙ словѣньскъ / ⰔⰎⰑⰂⰡⰐⰠⰔⰍⰟ ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ 日本語 ∙ македонски ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to File:Tattooed model wearing a war bonnet.jpg, you will be blocked from editing Wikimedia Commons.

Do not remove valid categories from images.--Belbury (talk) 20:06, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Зачем вы отменили две мои правки? Предварительно сообщу, что я автор фундаментальных статей "Венец из перьев" (то есть warbonnet) и "Томагавк" в русскоязычной Википедии. Поэтому я знаю, что делаю. Кроме того, именно я навёл порядок (хотя мне иногда и мешали) на Викискладе по теме ремёсел и предметов быта индейцев Северной Америки (о другом не говорю).

Теперь об этих двух картинках. Тот топор — это не томагавк ни с какой стороны. Это современное изделие, которые выпускают современные кузнецы тысячами. Если их помещать на Викисклад, то они завалят его полностью. Тем более, они завалят своим количеством изображения настоящих индейских томагавков, которых не так много. Сам автор назвал своё изделие сразу и франциской, и томагавком, и метательным топором, и боевым топором. А в реальности это просто сувенирное изделие. В лучшем случае, туристический топор. То есть это к индейским томагавкам не имеет никакого отношения.

Про головной убор на европейской девушке с татуированными ногами и в кружевных трусиках. Вы не будете утверждать, что это индейский вождь, заслуженный воин или просто современный индеец? Так и шапка на её голове — это не индейская почётная регалия, а китайское массовое сувенирное изделие. В Китае и Таиланде их производят тысячами и продают в любых странах. Они легко узнаваемы по полоске из крестиков над лбом и по перьям от самых разных местных птиц, доступных для азиатских производителей.

Вот и подумайте, правильно ли вы поступили… Сергей 6662 (talk) 20:59, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for that, all I saw was a category being removed from an image I'd uploaded, without an edit summary, or any corresponding correction to the filename and description.

I see your point and appreciate your expertise, it is definitely worth making the distinction. A subcategory for cheap replicas would probably be a good idea, so that these images don't get added back to the superficially obvious categories again by someone else later on. Belbury (talk) 22:18, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Нельзя вводить такие категории. (Хотя по современным "томагавкам" такая категория всё же есть.) В них будет собираться весь мусор из интернета. Я же нахожусь в теме и знаю, что интернет переполнен тысячами фотографий полуголых девиц в китайских шапках с перьями. Сами индейцы протестуют против такого отношения к их почётной и даже священной регалии. Это относится и к тем случаям, когда их надевают артисты или спортсмены. Индейцы сами могут подарить такой головной убор какому-то заслуженному человеку, даже целой спортивной команде. Но это будут всё же уборы их перьев орла, то есть священной птицы, а не из непонятных перьев, добытых китайскими браконьерами. То же самое относится и к топорам. Кузнецы по всему миру сейчас производят миллионы авторских работ. А фирмы штампуют множество топоров для туризма или для непонятно чего. И часто с коммерческой целью называют их томагавками, так как это понятно и модно. Но томагавк — это только и только индейский боевой топор. Поэтому не надо захламлять эту категорию. А современный ширпотреб можно выставлять где-то в другом месте. Хотя зачем и кому это интересно? --Сергей 6662 (talk) 23:37, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are category trees at Category:Replicas of clothing and Category:Replicas of weapons which could take subcategories. If you care that some replicas are being misidentified as the real items, it seems better to recategorise them accordingly, rather than to remove the category and hope that people realise what that means (somebody searching for "war bonnet" will still find File:Tattooed model wearing a war bonnet.jpg from the filename and text description), and that nobody just adds the category back again in future. Belbury (talk) 11:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you worried about fools who need half-naked girls in Chinese hats for some reason? There is a lot of such garbage on the Internet. Millions of pieces. Let them graze there. And it is not necessary to fill Wikipedia, and especially a very special topic. I have to repeat myself already. Сергей 6662 (talk) 15:35, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:War bonnets

Why did you remove it from several images, like this one? RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:30, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm answering. I don't understand why someone uploaded 100500 frequently repeated images to the Warbonnet category, which collects images of only special military feather hats of North American Indians. No feathers on the head of Africans, Papuans, Aztecs or South American Indians belong to them. In addition, this is a whole series of reportage shots from some obscure event of an Amazonian tribe and a couple of local officials (or who are they?), which turned out to be even more than pictures from real warbonnets. Or with wapa' ha, in the Sioux language. Let these promotional pictures of unknown characters be anywhere, but not in this category, which has long been put in order, including by me. Сергей 6662 (talk) 12:38, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Сергей 6662, you should have created a subcategory instead of simply removing it from the images. By the way, one of those “unknown characters” is Lula da Silva, current president of Brazil. RodRabelo7 (talk) 13:10, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You shouldn't have, because these pictures already have many places where they are placed. And here only military headdresses of North American Indians are collected. And not any, but only a certain kind. Your Brazilians have nothing to do with this. Moreover, there is nothing for the president of Brazil to do with some woman. And scary aborigines. It is also outraged that so many of the same type of frames were dumped. It was like cutting a film. I occasionally keep my topics in order. I don't do uninteresting things. Сергей 6662 (talk) 19:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Brazilians have nothing to do with this; And scary aborigines—Sort of… racist. Anyway… RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:06, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I use an auto-translator, which does not always translate accurately. Besides, I've already explained everything. Let's end the argument here. Сергей 6662 (talk) 00:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Трефиловщина

Category:Трефиловщина has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

AlexTref871 (talk) 16:43, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Dmitrovskaya Tower, side view - Nizhny XVI VR project.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Dmitrovskaya Tower, side view - Nizhny XVI VR project.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Dmitrovskaya Tower, side view - Nizhny XVI VR project.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Just having been published on the author's VK page doesn't put the file in the public domain (unless there's something special about VK in this regard that I don't know). --bjh21 (talk) 14:52, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Сергей 6662

Contents

File:Biktop.024.jpg

Copyright status: File:Mealing stone and mano.jpg

Copyright status: File:The diggers in Adygea.jpg

File:Chief Crazy Horse.jpg

Native American = USA

Category:Other_birch_bark_canoes

Category:Indigenous peoples of North America by name

Edit warring

Vandalism warning

Notification about possible deletion

Warning for repeated vandalism

Category:War bonnets

Category:Трефиловщина

File tagging File:Dmitrovskaya Tower, side view - Nizhny XVI VR project.jpg

Navigation menu

User talk:Сергей 6662

File:Biktop.024.jpg

Copyright status: File:Mealing stone and mano.jpg

Copyright status: File:The diggers in Adygea.jpg

File:Chief Crazy Horse.jpg

Native American = USA

Category:Other_birch_bark_canoes

Category:Indigenous peoples of North America by name

Edit warring

Vandalism warning

Notification about possible deletion

Warning for repeated vandalism

Category:War bonnets

Category:Трефиловщина

File tagging File:Dmitrovskaya Tower, side view - Nizhny XVI VR project.jpg

Navigation menu

Search