User:Victuallers/archivecommons2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Timestamps

[edit]

Hi, would you please add timestamps to the screenshots you've submitted for {{Licensereview}}? The {{From YouTube}} template documentation explains one way of doing it I am no longer watching this pageping if you'd like a response czar 20:44, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi Czar (again :)), that's a lot of work. I usually try and do a screengrab that includes the time indicator, but I think I may have missed this on some screengrabs. However there is discussion over whether commons is willing to accept that reputable organisations own the copyright of films they distribute. (e.g. here. So it looks as if we might have to abandon this idea. I have been trying to persuade organisations to add cc-by-sa to their websites. If we are not going to take their work for it then it certainly puts a hole in how I thought we were going to succeed. If you have time then can you tell me whether you think I am just wasting my time? Victuallers (talk) 09:14, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

A sample screen shot loaded for Czar to see. When approved this will be cropped to remove everything but Ms Phillips

I loaded this pic. This one is from NdaniTV. As you can see its a talk show that have been hosting. Its labelled up with Ndanitv and was shot with Nigerian celebs. On the picture you can see the time measure so you can see where it was in the video. But these are one-set videos so its pretty easy to see its the same vid from nearby shots. Do you agree that this is licensed cc-by-sa by a reputable source? I would appreciate your input Czar as I don't want this to be treated in a prejudicial way because its not made in Europe or the USA. cheers Victuallers (talk) 08:56, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi, re: the repute of the YouTube channel, you can usually tell from the presentation. If it's an official channel, it will be linked directly from the company website, possibly have a theme or regular original content, and otherwise is distinguishable from user channels that repost without regard to copyright. (For example, most Western news sources do not freely license their reports, so they tend to be on YouTube without permission or proper license.) Without too much digging into your example to the right, yes, I'd review its license and don't see any prima facie reason to not accept that it's the official channel. With my original message, I only meant to suggest
{{From YouTube|aBAOF9TkErQ|#NDANIREALTALK - S1E4 - SHOULD A WOMAN DOWNPLAY HER SUCCESS TO KEEP A MAN?|t=1m30s}}
YouTube: #NDANIREALTALK - S1E4 - SHOULD A WOMAN DOWNPLAY HER SUCCESS TO KEEP A MAN? (Time: 1m30s) – View/save archived versions on archive.org and archive.today
instead of just the bare URL (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBAOF9TkErQ) so that it's easier to verify the timestamp. (No need for the YouTube UI elements, as in the screenshot to the right.) By the way, you might be interested in this ticket for adding screenshot functionality to toollabs:video2commons. (Feel free to {{Ping}} to get my attention in the future.) czar 22:55, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
@Czar: Oh some automation would be useful. Re documenting info that is already there could easily be done by a bot. I have added the template as you suggested although one of us has made a type somewhere as it fails to be rendered. However I'm optimistic that you can come to decision about this file. Cheers Roger Victuallers (talk) 22:38, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

When you upload images from youtube, please consider giving the time of the image on the video clip as this uploader did here...for a future reviewer did here. I have very little time to go through a 15 minute clip sometimes. This is just a suggestion. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:41, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Sika Osei Ghanain actress in 2017.png

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Sika Osei Ghanain actress in 2017.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 09:12, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Sika Osei Ghanain actress on NdaniTV.png

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Sika Osei Ghanain actress on NdaniTV.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 09:13, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

  • Wrong video clips above? No source for them. PS: I cannot find the image from this clip File:Gbemi Olateru-Olagbeg 02.png since no time is given...for this long clip. Maybe you can type in the time interval? Thank You and Goodnight, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:15, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
@Leoboudv: Thanks for spotting these. I have added new urls to the first two anmd a new image to the third. thx again Victuallers (talk) 11:12, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Images marked. --Leoboudv (talk) 19:19, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
File:Brookhouse Shaft.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tine (talk) 19:46, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Something went wrong with this image upload. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:48, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks @Leoboudv: , I have loaded a new version, The other was a screen grab before I fullscreened it. Cheers and good xmas Victuallers (talk) 11:27, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Image marked. --Leoboudv (talk) 01:31, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Image without license

[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 02:09, 20 December 2017 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 02:09, 20 December 2017 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 02:10, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Bamba, Catherine and Sophia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:23, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Mimi Plange on NdaniTV in 2017.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Selimae (talk) 23:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Kiki Omeili on NdaniTV 2018.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 10:08, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Defaulsort

[edit]

Dear Victuallers, When making a new Category like [[Category:Bessie Semple]], please be sure to add a DEFAULTSORT, so the correct sorting will take place. Vysotsky (talk) 16:37, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Defaultsort (again)

[edit]

Dear Victuallers, When making new Categories like [[Category:Zojka Naskova]] and [[Category:Marina Tuneva]], please be sure to add a DEFAULTSORT, so the correct sorting will take place. Vysotsky (talk) 22:08, 7 March 2018 (UTC) I'll try and remember Victuallers (talk) 14:57, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:42, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Image without license

[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 14:16, 29 March 2018 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 14:17, 29 March 2018 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 14:17, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Lists and tables

[edit]

Interesting Category:VisibleWikiWomen, is this for a particular event? You may be interested in listeriabot. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Recent_deaths Avery Jensen (talk) 16:49, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A.Savin 18:21, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Ilze Jaunalksne and bloke.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:48, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Thuso Mbedu is in MTV Shuga.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:38, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Revert Sylvia Martínez Elizondo 2.jpg

[edit]

Hi, I reversed you because you (re)uploaded a "duplicate" image. I cropped the original file. --Wiki-1776 (talk) 18:58, 2 May 2018 (UTC)


Very bad crop on Maria Frolova, serve, means more space left-right. --Mile (talk) 13:18, 15 May 2018 (UTC) Also check pages before doing something. Maria Frolova So never mistake by always checking everything - great idea. Can I quote you? Victuallers (talk) 13:25, 15 May 2018 (UTC) It looks worse. Victuallers (talk) 13:27, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Graphic Designer Barnstar

[edit]

Thanks a lot!! --Chairego apc (talk) 08:47, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Es Devlin at FutureFest.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

167.98.16.36 09:42, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

USATF Championships 2018

[edit]

Hi, I saw you are currently uploading some of the new USATF-pics from https://www.flickr.com/photos/37695693@N05/albums. I planned to do so too, so two questions from my side: Do you plan to import all pictures? And: Do you plan to add some more categories? (there already is Category:USA Outdoor Track and Field Championships, so you could create Category:2018 USA Outdoor Track and Field Championships an then subcategories like for example Category:2018 USA Outdoor Track and Field Championships – Women's 100 meters. I could do that too of course, but would prefer to have all pictures from the four albums here first)

Thanks a lot for your answer.--Mondfeuer61 (talk) 10:48, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

No my interest was only in the women and I did not intend to load all of them or add more cats. I was really interested in identifying then as the prime task and finding new pix for existing articles Victuallers (talk) 11:16, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Ok, I will do so then, even though I have to take care to avoid dupliates now, Flickr2commons doesn't prevent them unfortunately. Mondfeuer61 (talk)
File:Grantham Museum Edith Smith.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kelly (talk) 11:00, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Long list of files

Yours sincerely, Guanaco (talk) 05:11, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

What is the exact time code for this image from YouTube? The one you uploaded is corrupted and the time code you gave in the source is not correct per what does load. Could you please fix it or let me know the exact time you wanted and I'll fix it. Thanks. --Majora (talk) 19:41, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

@Majora: Oh dear - the time code was recorded at the bottom of the image, and that has failed to load. We have enough pictures of her so I suggest you speedy delete this as "below quality". Sorry to put you to to this. Is it easy to get the ability to delete my own mistakes? Victuallers (talk) 21:07, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Only administrators can directly delete images but if you are the uploader and you realize you made a mistake you can request that it be deleted by putting {{G7}} on the file information page. This generally only works if you realize and request delete within the first 7 days of uploading. After which it usually requires a DR but since this is a corrupted file I went ahead and tagged it. It shouldn't be a problem but I'll DR it if it is. Thanks. --Majora (talk) 21:13, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
File:Occupy Oakland break Godwin's law.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 15:48, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Elissa Aalto 1959 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mlang.Finn (talk) 16:33, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Makida Moka in Code of Silence film.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Screenshot from a film - taken from youtube, which is also a copyvio. Black Kite (talk) 18:46, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Lidia Yuknavitch at Powell's, Best Sex Writing 2012.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:06, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Image without license

[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 19:06, 27 September 2018 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 19:06, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

I've fixed and reviewed these for you. The template {{From Vimeo}} only generates a link to the video; you still need to add a license template. I don't think there are any Vimeo-specific templates, so the generic Creative Commons templates should be fine. clpo13(talk) 19:16, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Iskra Lawrence.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

185.212.171.51 10:25, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Paula Ingabire

[edit]

Hello Victuallers,

I think you made a mistake when cropping this photo. You identitified the black lady on the right to be Paula Ingabire. But it's actually Ursula Owusu-Ekuful (look at the other photos in her category). Paula Ingabire must be the black lady on the left of the original picture. --Titlutin (talk) 01:07, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

License review for Jan Arkesteijn uploads

[edit]

Hi, I have overwritten and redone the license review you added back in April for File:Mariana Gheorghe (2015).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs). The reason Flickrreview failed was because the image had been digitally changed, including the EXIF data. By overwriting with the digitally authentic original, the automatic review has now worked and I have made a recrop, keeping the colours authentic to the photographer's original choices.

As Jan Arkesteijn has been blocked for similar issues of misrepresenting original works, I suggest following a similar workflow if oddly coloured images from a different Flickr original come up. Thanks -- (talk) 11:08, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Image without license

[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 21:53, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 19:19, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Image without license

[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 16:06, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Wish

[edit]

Hello. Help improve for [1]. Thanks you.125.214.50.74 12:16, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Halina Rubinsztein-Dunlop.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Halina Rubinsztein-Dunlop.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

--Animalparty (talk) 21:38, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:37, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Feedback for Commons Android app

[edit]

Hello,

Thanks for uploading photos to Commons via the Commons Android app! :) We (the developers of the app) have recently submitted a Project Grant proposal for the app, detailing our plans for the app in 2019. As a user of the app, we would love to hear your thoughts on it, if you have the time.

Cheers, Misaochan (talk) 11:12, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Frustration with Wikimedia Editors

[edit]

Hi!

Thank you so much for helping with Arcand's page and I certainly appreciate your positive thank you's!

I'm having issues with posting two images for Arcand and maybe you can provide assistance on how I can handle this. I'm so frustrated now.

I added Arcand's podcast from Subject Matter X to her Wikipedia page along with the accompanying image of Arcand that was on the podcast page. The image of Arcand and the podcast go hand-in-hand. Just like like a music CD you would purchase comes in a container with an image cover.

Here's the link to the podcast and you'll see Arcand's image on the Subject Matter X background. https://soundcloud.com/subjectmatterx/005-exploring-the-universe-with-nasas-x-ray-telescope

I was provided permission from Subject Matter X to use the podcast and they placed the Wikimedia Commons licence on their page with the podcast and image

  1. 005: Exploring the Universe with NASA's X-ray Telescope and Kim Arcand by Subject Matter X is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

On their page if you click on *Released by* than *Show More* you will see the license.

This is the license they used: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/

The Subject Matter X image is a combination of their background image and a image of Arcand placed on their image. I found out later that Arcand's image was taken by Brittanny Taylor.

A Wikimedia editor found Brittanny Taylor's Arcand's image on her Amazon page where she sells books and deleted the image immediately without notifying me. Here is the Amazon page with Arcand's image...same image on the Subject Matter X image

https://smile.amazon.com/Kimberly-K.-Arcand/e/B00DVO8B9Y/ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_4?qid=1545497143&sr=1-4

They want Brittanny Taylor to provide permission to use the Subject Matter X image with Arcand's photo on it.

This second image issue is my own work, an image of Arcand that I took at the TEDx Providence event which I attended. I posted my own work of Arcand at TEDx on her Wikipedia page in her info Box, but now Wikipedia editor Patrick Rogel found this same image of Arcand that I took on Arcand's Facebook page and he has marked my own work for deletion and says I have a history of copyright violations. The history is two images, one of my own work at TEDx Providence and the Subject Matter X image.

Here are two links of the two images I posted (one which is my own work) marked for deletion:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Kimberly_Kowal_Arcand_at_TEDx_Providence_Rhode_Island.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Tracykarin#File%3AKimberly_Kowal_Arcand_at_TEDx_Providence_Rhode_Island.jpg

As I was typing this message, I'm being told by Wikipedia editor Patrick Rogel that Facebook images are not FREE and I need to place a license on my Facebook page where I posted Arcand's image at TEDx

This image of Arcand that I took was posted on NASA's Chandra X-ray website with credit on this page...scroll down to 2nd image.

http://chandra.si.edu/blog/node/607

I'm so frustrated and stressed out now that I no longer want to contribute to Wikipedia.

Thank you for your time, support and understanding.

Tracykarin (talk) 17:30, 22 December 2018 (UTC)


Hi Victuallers,

After I just replied to your kind response on my user talk page, I found while I was writing my reply message to you that my image of Arcand at TEDx providence is tagged deletion again by Patrick Rogel. Jeff G. wants me to upload the original image again. Below is what transpired.

File:Kimberly Kowal Arcand at TEDx Providence Rhode Island.jpg I withdrew my nomination too early. Permission was not given at all; user just added a message to the Facebook account. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:08, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

@Tracykarin: Can you upload or point us to an online copy of the original 5,472 × 3,648 px photo? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:31, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Roger and Jeff,

This is getting ridiculous...really! This is my own image, my own work. My personal camera data was uploaded along with the original image.

Show me a Wikimedia Common rule that I'm violating.

I feel this is just plain harassment.

Tracykarin (talk) 19:28, 23 December 2018 (UTC)


I feel this is just plain harassment.

Not sure what to do now.

Thank you Victuallers

Tracykarin (talk) 19:46, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Reply on yr page. I agree with you. Victuallers (talk) 10:27, 24 December 2018 (UTC)


Hello, can you please clarify the source and its original publication date ? I found this which is not very clear. Thanks, — Racconish💬 11:15, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi I've sharpened the date of filming by 3 days. Publication date is unclear. Youtube source is interesting but as you say unclear. I'm going with the source I gave which is much more clear and was the one I used. Not sure why you feel the free use is in doubt. Victuallers (talk) 17:05, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
As you probably know, the fact you - or Magnus Gertten and Jesper Osmund - don't know who the director is is not a sufficient proof he is anonymous. On the other hand, the producer of film has a neighbouring right computed from the first publication date, which makes the latter important to establish. In the absence of these informations, we cannot unfortunately claim the work is PD just because we don't know enough. — Racconish💬 17:19, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

AGF

[edit]

Hi. you've entitled your section "suggestion" so I didn't expect a reply to you was mandatory. Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:18, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Gohar-gasparyan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dogad75 (talk) 20:34, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Emma McClarkin MEP at Vista.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Emma McClarkin MEP at Vista.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:00, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Emma McClarkin MEP at Vista.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: License review NOT passed: Flickr uploader did not shoot this photo, and did not release it with a license or explain why it would be PD. See also COM:PDM.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 17:42, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Emma McClarkin MEP (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: License review NOT passed: Flickr uploader did not shoot this photo, and did not release it with a license or explain why it would be PD. See also COM:PDM.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 17:43, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:GES Opening Plenary on June 23, 2016.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:GES Opening Plenary on June 23, 2016.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 02:30, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Secretary Perdue, joined by NYSE President Stacey Cunningham, to ring the NYSE Closing Bell.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Secretary Perdue, joined by NYSE President Stacey Cunningham, to ring the NYSE Closing Bell.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 03:20, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:NYSE President Stacey Cunningham rings the NYSE Closing Bell (cropped).jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:NYSE President Stacey Cunningham rings the NYSE Closing Bell (cropped).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 03:20, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your recent file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 03:25, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Janet Barrowman left and Helen Crawfurd Anderson.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:14, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Helen Crawfurd Anderson.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:14, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Janet Barrowman left.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:15, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

[edit]

Copyright status: File:Women of Somalia.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Women of Somalia.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:47, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi Ron, I think we have forgotten what the job was "This work has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights.You can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. See Other Information below.
@Ronhjones: You may be able to find some reason to ignore this clear text written by Flickr and Creative commons, but I can see no reason why I should assist you in wasting the projects time. Delete it if you feel that you are assisting the project - I would assist you if I felt that there was some micro-improvement. I must say that I think you would assist Wikipedia and out prime objective by not doing so. This picture is loaded by OUR TOOLS and imagining that you do not have evidence that this was not INTENDED to be shared is ignoring the obvious. If there is a big problem then solve it. Wasting both our time with doing this file by file is less than pointless. Have a good 2019 and lets hope we can improve shared information. Victuallers (talk) 11:43, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
PDM on Flickr is correct, the Creative Commons license you added is wrong though. {{PD-Somalia}} is the right template for this. Ronhjones should have started a DR instead of tagging dozens of photos for speedy deletion. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:03, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Racconish💬 12:14, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Category:Rosa_Genomi has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Wuselig (talk) 11:58, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

xplicit 02:18, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright
File:Motunrayo Umaru of Maju on Fashion Insider 2019.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The copyright notice at the source says: "AdRev for a 3rd Party (on behalf of Extreme Music); AdRev Publishing." There is no youtube license since it is not free.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 10:42, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Maju with Jemima Osunde on Fashion Insider on Ndanitv 2019.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 10:44, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Maju on Fashion Insider on Ndanitv 2019.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 10:44, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello.This category is uncategorized.Is this person also part of "WikiProject Women in Red"?Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 08:34, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

youtube screenshots

[edit]

Hi! I think it would be better if the youtube player UI is trimmed from the screenshots before you upload them, e.g. File:Jemima Osunde Fashion Insider Ndanitv 2018.jpg. Alternatively, you could play the video in full screen mode and press shortcut keys to capture when the UI is auto hidden.--Roy17 (talk) 22:20, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

@Roy17: another way to get the YT player UI out of the way, if within scope and not overloaded with derivative work, is to upload the whole video using video2commons and take screenshots here. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:59, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Image without license

[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 20:03, 4 February 2019 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 20:04, 4 February 2019 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 20:04, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

some wrong file names and descriptions

[edit]

Hi, there are some problems with some of the files you uploaded a few days ago:

Unfortunately, the descriptions and filenames mentioned the people in the wrong order. Not your fault, because the original Flickr description was already wrong. I'd say the people on this picture are (from left to right):

Also, you extracted some new files from these files:

The names are mixed up, too. The first picture depicts Walker, the second Backer (and since she's the only one depicted, the "et al." is a bit confusing ;-) ). Could you please correct the file names, descriptions and ideally also file usages? Regards --Schniggendiller (talk) 22:01, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Michael G Spafford's pic of Women's Participation in Decision-Making & Leadership. With Justina Mutale Rainatou Sow Naana Otoo-Oyortey and Dr Anouka van Eerdewijk.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 05:37, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

File:MTV Shuga Zamo February 2019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 05:39, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

File:MTV Shuga Lerato Walaza as Zamo February 2019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 05:39, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Image without license

[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 10:32, 13 February 2019 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 10:33, 13 February 2019 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 10:33, 13 February 2019 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 12:35, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Farzaneh Milani and father.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: It doesn't look like YouTube video uploader has rights to redistribute this photo under a Commons license.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Chiyako92 (talk) 16:43, 7 March 2019 (UTC)


#invoke:Autotranslate Public domain tag does not apply to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. Chiyako92 (talk) 14:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Template:File permission/layout Public domain tag does not apply to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. Chiyako92 (talk) 14:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate JuTa 18:47, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Abzeronow ([[User talk:Abzeronow|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:14, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Leoboudv ([[User talk:Leoboudv|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:21, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Coraline's reviews ([[User talk:Coraline's reviews|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:32, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate Jcb ([[User talk:Jcb|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:10, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:43, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Marine Petit

[edit]

[2] [3]

Did the license change? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:03, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Don't know Alexis. Could be my mistake. Changing it should have no effect on its usage. Victuallers ([[User talk:Victuallers#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:12, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
I mean, there is no free license at the source. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:37, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:22, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda ([[User talk:Ytoyoda|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:53, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Poppy Northcutt image

[edit]

Hi there, I saw you added a photo of Poppy Northcutt to the Commons that was sourced via an image from the United Nations' Twitter account. The rights this image, as far as I'm aware, are held by a stock photo agency, as is not necessarily a NASA publication. Can you please double check to make sure the licensing info is correct? Fairly certain this is not in the public domain, and therefore not eligible for inclusion on Commons, but I'd be thrilled to be wrong. Thank you! Girona7 ([[User talk:Girona7|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:12, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

The link to Getty Images is not very good proof. They will sell you many pictures that are out of copyright or of dubious history. Victuallers ([[User talk:Victuallers#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:09, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Mutter Erde ([[User talk:Mutter Erde|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:44, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate World's Lamest Critic ([[User talk:World's Lamest Critic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:31, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate GMGtalk 18:14, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate RL0919 ([[User talk:RL0919|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:25, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Jkg1997 ([[User talk:Jkg1997|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:42, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Image without license

[edit]

Template:Autotranslate

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 18:05, 30 September 2019 (UTC)


Template:Autotranslate

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 18:06, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments UK 2019!

[edit]

Hi

Thank you so much for contributing to the UK section of this year's Wiki Loves Monuments contest, which finished yesterday. We really do appreciate the time and effort you've put in to record the UK's built cultural heritage for future generations.

Your contribution has been been added to our collections here on Wikimedia Commons, and is already available for editors to make use of on Wikipedia and elsewhere. It has also been entered into this year's contest. If you'd like to see your own images, just click on the uploads link at the top right of this page (if you don't see it, click on the Log in option first).

We've received over 10,000 UK entries this year, and it will take a few weeks for our volunteers and professional judges to decide on the final top 10. The winners will be announced by the end of this month, both here on Wikimedia Commons and also on the competition website.

The top 10 UK images will go forward to the international section where they will compete against winners from some 50 other countries. The international winners should be announced here in December.

Don't forget, by the way, that if you're hoping to win a prize in the contest it's essential that you have enabled email in your Wikimedia preferences. If you haven't, you're not eligible to win. If you're unsure, please check here.

Once again, many thanks for your help! MichaelMaggs ([[User talk:MichaelMaggs|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:58, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

umm done that? Victuallers ([[User talk:Victuallers#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:23, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Jochen Burghardt ([[User talk:Jochen Burghardt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:34, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Template:WLM 2019 thank you

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


So terribly sorry, I meant to add more photos to these articles, not take them away! But this one is pretty clear. GRuban ([[User talk:GRuban|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:04, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

[edit]

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Leoboudv ([[User talk:Leoboudv|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:56, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, Regasterios ([[User talk:Regasterios|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:06, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate GMGtalk 13:24, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Victuallers ([[User talk:Victuallers#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:22, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate And also:

sourced to image since deleted as copyvio Yours sincerely, BevinKacon ([[User talk:BevinKacon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:12, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Vera (talk) 14:30, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi, please show interest?--Kingbjelica ([[User talk:Kingbjelica|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:33, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:19, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Matlin ([[User talk:Matlin|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:22, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Vera (talk) 09:19, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 108.31.180.119 23:44, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, Vera (talk) 16:06, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Estopedist1 ([[User talk:Estopedist1|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:57, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate GSS (talk) 10:01, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Leoboudv ([[User talk:Leoboudv|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:07, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate Nominated for deletion by User:Well-Informed Optimist. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot ([[User talk:Deletion Notification Bot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate Nominated for deletion by User:Well-Informed Optimist. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot ([[User talk:Deletion Notification Bot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate Nominated for deletion by User:Well-Informed Optimist. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot ([[User talk:Deletion Notification Bot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:52, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate Nominated for deletion by User:Well-Informed Optimist. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot ([[User talk:Deletion Notification Bot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:32, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate Nominated for deletion by User:Well-Informed Optimist. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot ([[User talk:Deletion Notification Bot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:32, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate Nominated for deletion by User:A1Cafel. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot ([[User talk:Deletion Notification Bot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:11, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate Nominated for deletion by User:A1Cafel. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot ([[User talk:Deletion Notification Bot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:12, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate Nominated for deletion by User:A1Cafel. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot ([[User talk:Deletion Notification Bot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:12, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Patrick Rogel ([[User talk:Patrick Rogel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:11, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Veverve ([[User talk:Veverve|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:06, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Dear Victuallers,

In this case, this Polish uploader typed in the time the image appears....so there is no need to upload a second image. Best, --Leoboudv ([[User talk:Leoboudv|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:30, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Better YouTube screenshots

[edit]

First of all, thanks for all the work you do uploading images!

I've noticed that you tend to upload YouTube screenshots that still have the interface in them. If you're comfortable using the command line, it's not too difficult to get a higher-resolution photo without the interface. Once you've found a particular video and a particular timestamp, you can use youtube-dl to download the highest-resolution version of the video on YouTube. Then, using ffmpeg you can run ffmpeg -i video file -ss start time -t duration frame-%d.png to extract the frames from a given timestamp in seconds for a specified duration (i.e. from 0:32 to 0:33 would be -ss 32 -t 1). That will give you a bunch of frames from which you can pick out the exact right one in full resolution.

You may have seen that I've been going through old uploads and adding new versions with the interface removed using this method; I'll probably continue to do that until I get bored of it. Vahurzpu ([[User talk:Vahurzpu|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:47, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

TheBellaTwins1445

[edit]

Hi there, I have seen that you are a Flickr reviewer, can you help me reviewing my file - https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archivo:Limahl_in_2016.jpg in order to know if its correct to be used on Wikipedia or we need to delete it, hope you can help me. Regards. TheBellaTwins1445 ([[User talk:TheBellaTwins1445|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:10, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate talk 05:18, 2 June 2020 (UTC)