Commons:Upload help/Archive/2015/03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

the usage of images from a company

Dear Sir/Madam,

One of the media files I recently uploaded has been deleted because of the copyright violation. I have a spoken permission from the company to use their logo and/or other images taken from their websites. It is my understanding that I have to email a copyright license of the permission. Could you kindly tell me how it should be done and in what form it should be written out? If i could get an example of such a license, i would greatly appreciate it. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alinkaua (talk • contribs) 09:44, 26 February 2015‎ (UTC)

Tell them to go through COM:OTRS to vouch for you. AnonMoos (talk) 13:18, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Specifically for a sample of the form of a permission letter, see COM:Email templates#Declaration of consent for all inquiries. It should be sent from an e-mail account in the company’s domain.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 04:08, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Just to ask a question of uploading photos...

I would like to upload a picture of somebody else's Flickr (nothing personal, just a furry celebrity) who I do not know. Next to the image, it states some copyright law kind of thing that said "You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material". I really wish to put this up, and I don't know if I'm able to or not. Here's the pages: [1] and [2]. What should I do to have full legality and permission to upload the image? Thanks! HanSangYoon (talk) 09:17, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

I went to the first link and saw "Attribution Noncommercial Share Alike", which means that an NC license is used that is not allowed on Commons. See Template:Cc-by-nc-sa... -- AnonMoos (talk) 09:41, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
@AnonMoos: So does that really mean it's impossible? Not even permission from the owner is allowed?HanSangYoon (talk) 16:21, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
The image creator can choose to drop the "NC" clause, but other people can't make that decision for him. AnonMoos (talk) 16:28, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
HanSangYoon, the only CC licenses acceptable to Wikimedia are ones that contain -BY, -SA or -BY-SA. However, NC and/or ND are acceptable ONLY if the work is dual licensed and the other license contains enough features to cancel out the -NC or -ND elements. You can try to persuade the Flickr-user to change the license. If they do change it to an acceptable license, then you can upload the file, but it is highly recommended that you request a license review by adding {{Flickrreview}} to the file description page. This is a precaution because Flickr-users can change the license for their uploads but without a publicly-viewable record of previous licenses. If you do not request a review and the license does change again, then the file will need to be deleted. Green Giant (talk) 22:36, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

نوع الملفات التي يمكن تنزيلها للموسوعة

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته لدي سؤال واتمنى الاجابة عليه ماهي نوع الملفات التي يمكن تنزيلها للكومنز Hassan Elgssir (talk)


هذه صفحة ويكيبيديا الإنجليزية. طرح الأسئلة العربية على صفحة ويكيبيديا العربية، من فضلك. شكرا. Please ask Arabic questions on Arabic Wikipedia. I apologize for the terrible translation. HanSangYoon (talk) 20:33, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

HanSangYoon, please note that this is not the English Wikipedia. It is perfectly acceptable for someone to ask a question in the language that they are most comfortable with. Hassan Elgssir, please read → Commons:File types. You can also ask for help at Commons:الميدان. Green Giant (talk) 22:25, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Pak Kustanto

I have an article to upload on Wiki but you do not accept extension .doc. What is the solusion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pak Kustanto (talk • contribs) 14:09, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

This is Wikimedia Commons. It's Wikipedia which has articles, but they're edited, not uploaded. Microsoft Word proprietary format files are not needed or wanted here... AnonMoos (talk) 16:07, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

copyrights

Hello, I would like to get advice on how I can find out about this picture's copyrights:

Thanks for the help, Kind Regards, Pierre Kawak — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pierre Kawak (talk • contribs) 16:24, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Since you're the uploader, you're more likely to have relevant information than anyone here. Where did you get it from? AnonMoos (talk) 16:44, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

پوهندوی نور احمد شاکر

File:نور احمد شاکر

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Khsarwari (talk • contribs) 04:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Not too sure what you're trying to ask, but the image tag you added could never display because the indicated name lacks a filetype suffix. AnonMoos (talk) 06:21, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Files and licenses

Hi there, I would like to upload a file to my wikipedia page .I don't know the part about license & stuff.Please help me out.

Regards, Lobo

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.12.161.68 (talk • contribs) 16:19, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello. May I ask what the file is? This will help us determine the licensing. Anon124 (+2) (✉ ⚒) 20:31, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Загрузка файлов

Добрый день! Не могу загрузить файлы (собственного производства). Подскажите, как можно решить данный вопрос. Выгружал их на страницу, но их удалили - не поверили в Авторство/что-то ещё - не ясно... Помогите разобраться. Заранее благодарю. Штыров Дмитрий (talk) 11:16, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Google translation: Download files—Good afternoon! I can not download files (own production). Tell me how to solve this issue. Upload them on the page, but they were removed - not believe in authorship / something else - it is not clear ... Please help me. Thank you in advance. Штыров Дмитрий (Talk • contribs) • added by Be..anyone (talk) 04:24, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
@Denniss: no idea what that's about, but later one file made it and is INUSE. @Штыров Дмитрий: please add categories. –Be..anyone (talk) 04:42, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

licenses for Photos

Dears
I write articles in Wikipedia about Syrian Banks and Some Historical events. actually I am very interested to write in Wikipedia and I have more than 110 Contributions.
I have problem with commons, they have deleted a lot of photos or logos or even videos I have uploaded to use it !!!
although, I have mentioned the original e-link of the resource and I informed that most of Photos are created in Syria and there is no copyright with it.
Could you please help me.

Thank you.
--Just For Syria (talk) 09:32, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Logos are only allowed on Commons if copyright-expired, geometrically quite simple, or explicitly released under a suitable license. Photographs taken in Syria are not automatically uncopyrighted for that reason. As the image uploader, it's your responsibility to provide relevant information which can be used to assess an image's copyright status... AnonMoos (talk) 15:24, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Adding a photo to my article

Hello

I created the article on the musician Brendan Power and would now like to add a photo:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brendan_Power

I see that I need to find a photo of him in the public domain or one with a licence to use it, but I'm struggling to get to grips with this. There are lots of images of him on google but as I understand these are not usable.

Brendan would prefer it if we could use a new photo that I will take of him myself. How would I go about using that in the correct fashion?

Many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by RunBanjoRun (talk • contribs) 16:16, 5 March 2015‎ (UTC)

The big advantage of taking a picture yourself is that you are presumed to own the copyrights and can vouch for the image provenance. A few general tips: Keep as much resolution as possible during processing (if any), and leave the original camera metadata attached to the file. Choose an appropriate free licence (see COM:Licensing; make sure you‘re comfortable with the terms) and check that there’s a corresponding template on the file page after uploading. Add a concise description and at least one category that‘s as precise as possible in characterizing the subject. You may find it helpful to browse some similar content for examples. Good luck! (Please sign you messages by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end.)—Odysseus1479 (talk) 18:06, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
RunBanjoRun, if you take a new photo and don't put it online anywhere else, you can just upload it here. As you know, this means that others will have permission (a license) to use it (the upload process explains this in further detail). After that, you can add it to the Wikipedia article by following these instructions. Anon124 (+2) (✉ ⚒) 18:06, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Не могу загрузить файлы

Добрый день! Уже два года загружаю файлы (карты в формате svg). Но последние несколько дней не могу этого сделать. Получаю сообщение:Возможно, этот файл повреждён или имеет неправильное расширение. Файлы совершенно идентичные уже загруженным. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Istkart (talk • contribs) 10:02, 20 February 2015‎ (UTC)

Google translation: I can not download files—Good afternoon! For two years now upload files (formatted card svg). But the last few days can not do that. Get the message: The file might have been damaged or the wrong extension. Absolutely identical files already loaded. • added by Be..anyone (talk) 02:30, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

after uploading

When someone uploads any video or audio other than ogv or ogg extension like 3ga, mp4, mp3 etc. Are they converted into ogv or ogg extensions in commons naturally ?

Learnerktm (talk) 17:17, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

@Learnerktm: No, they must be converted before uploading. We do not accept uploads in those formats. But we do accept WebM, which will be kept as-is. Anon126 (✉ ⚒) 19:08, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Upload a photo

how do i upload a photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lennyworthington (talk • contribs) 03:39, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

@Lennyworthington: You can upload photos you've taken yourself by clicking the "Upload file" link in the sidebar. If you have trouble with that, please leave a new message and let us know where you're stuck. Anon126 (✉ ⚒) 05:28, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

transcode status? and transcripts

I have just uploaded a set of 27 radio broadcasts/podcasts which have been donated by my school, Tec de Monterrey, to Commons Category:Shot_Informativo_programs_donated_by_Concepto_Radial,_Tec_de_Monterrey,_Campus_Ciudad_de_México This is my first time uploading sound files of this type and I see a section called "Transcode status" but when I click on "update" it just opens up the same page in a different window. Does this happen to have something to do with attaching transcripts? I have many students doing an editathón next week and it would be great to get a number of them working on transcripts of these shows to add to the files.Thelmadatter (talk) 17:13, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

@Thelmadatter: The transcode section usually lists variants of the file converted to a different format (example). This is done to ensure compatibility in most browsers. Since your uploaded files are audio files and in ogg/vorbis, there is no other free format we support that would in turn be supported by a different browser. Therefore no transcoding is carried out and the section is empty. This is completely unrelated to transcripts.
To be most helpful, transcripts would be added as subtitles, too. Closed captions/ subtitles are explained: Manual on how to create subtitles?, A bit of everything about timed text., About Audio files in general.
-- Rillke(q?) 11:22, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
I noticed some music in those files (example). Who is the copyright holder of that music? -- Rillke(q?) 11:30, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
I dont have a direct answer to that question as I helped only with the initial letter to OTRS. I do know that the manager of Concepto Radial and OTRS exchanged various others and OTRS has now archived the permission(s). Im sure one of the OTRS folks can answer your question.Thelmadatter (talk) 00:18, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

uploading text

I have written the text in openoffice writer (text) and tried to copy/paste it onto the Wikipedia page. However, the tables did not copy correctly. I then tried to "embed" the file as an openoffice file, but apparently that type is currently not acceptable. I also attempted to upload a .pdf version of the openoffice file, but that was apparently rejected. Is there some way to correctly copy tables from openoffice to Wikipedia? How do I get this one-page text (openoffice) into Wikipedia?Vaughanth (talk) 23:27, 8 March 2015 (UTC) actual text follows, but not in correct format: table columns are not aligned correctly. Thank you Vaughan Thompson (vaughanth)

CONVERSION FROM DECIMAL TO OCTAL USING OCTAL ARITHMETIC ONLY The primary purpose for using octal arithmetic instead of decimal is that octal is much more efficient and natural than decimal. Octal arithmetic is completely parallel to both binary arithmetic and decimal arithmetic. For manual octal arithmetic, I am including a multiplication by 12 table (decimal 10) as follows: multiplier 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 

**product	0	12	24	36	50	62	74	106
decimal	0	10	20	30	40	50	60	70

Use the **product for 'dividend' ('accumulator') in the FRACTIONAL conversion below.

INTEGER PART We process the decimal number digit by digit from left to right ending at the decimal point in the following procedure: (note: always use the octal equivalent, 8:10; 9:11). 1. Load the most significant digit in accumulator (units position); 2. If at decimal point, stop; 3. Multiply accumulator by octal 12 (decimal 10). Use multiplication by 12 table in previous section. 4. Add next digit to accumulator (units position); 5. Go back to step 2. Example: convert decimal 892 to octal. step 1 3 4 3 4 Operation Load 10 x12 +11 x12 +2 accumulator 10 120 131 1572 1574Final answer

FRACTION PART We process the decimal fraction digit by digit from right to left ending at the decimal point in the following procedure: (note: always use the octal equivalent, 8:10; 9:11). Establish the accumulator as follows: (If computer, using integer arithmetic, the integral portion must be 4 to 6 bits and the fraction portion must be an exact multiple of 3 bits) Use the **product for 'dividend' ('accumulator') from the multiply by octal 12 above for step below. 1. Zero the accumulator. 2. Add current digit to the units position in the accumulator. 3. Divide the accumulator by 12 (decimal 10). Copy the quotient to the accumulator. 4. If not at decimal point, return to step 2, else stop. Important note: the point developed is an octal point instead of a decimal point. Example: convert decimal 0.126 to octal. step 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 Action 0 +6 /12 +2 /12 +1 /12 Accumulator 0 6 0.4631 2.4631 0.2051 1.2051 0.1004Final answer Example: convert decimal 0.874 to octal. step 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 Action 0 +4 /12 +7 /12 +10 /12 Accumulator 0 4 0.3146 7.3146 0.5727 10.5727 0.6774Final answer VERIFICATION Decimal addition: 0.126 + 0.874 = 1.000 (Decimal) Octal addition: 0.1004 + 0.6774 = 1.0000 (Octal) 1.000 (decimal) converts directly to 1.0000 (octal). Therefore, this is a single example of converting from decimal to octal (both integers and fractions). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaughanth (talk • contribs) 23:37, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons (this site) is all about media files (diagrams, photos, videos, sound recordings and so on). Plain text, such as tables, intended for use on Wikipedia is best represented using wiki markup directly on that project. en:Help:Table has some information which should be useful to you. —LX (talk, contribs) 00:27, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Photo and logo upload difficulty in Commons

Hi, it is quite difficult to upload a picture or a logo. In somebody else's similar question part of the answer was to provide "explicitly released under a suitable license". How can we have a sample of such a license for a company's logo? Why the upload of an organigramme or even a simple photo keeps failing? Thank you for your consideration, — Preceding unsigned comment added by INEDIVIM (talk • contribs) 14:11, 9 March 2015‎ (UTC)

Commons accepts content under any free license. Examples of commonly used free licenses include Creative Commons Attribution and Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike. Those licenses can be applied to any type of work. Commons:Guidance for paid editors contains more information about sharing logotypes correctly. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:49, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

I somehow did not get the content info nor credit to author when I uploaded

I need to retrieve the content and author info. It did not come with picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dihirsch54 (talk • contribs) 22:20, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Do you mean an image you downloaded? All that information will be found on the file page the picture came from. You can copy it directly from there, or in wikitext form from the Edit tab. If using Media Viewer, you can get the credit info in HTML or text format from the download pop-up pane. Another possibility is to use the StockPhoto gadget (assuming you haven’t disabled it in your Preferences), the “Use this file on the web” link contains the credit & licence info.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 04:22, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Will not let me upload a document. Saying cannot upload file ending in...rtfd. Its a simple word doc. Thank you

help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jane Lamerton (talk • contribs) 02:04, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

We do not host .doc files here. Depending on the content (see COM:SCOPE), it may be acceptable in PDF format instead. (Please sign your messages by typing four tildes, ~~~~ at the end.)—Odysseus1479 (talk) 03:34, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
And the reason is that wikimedia only hosts media in free file formats: Commons:Project scope#Must be an allowable free file format. Lklundin (talk) 10:17, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

No subject

First as my log on describes I was in the estate business. A while back I purchased an old photo album which included some interesting pictures, two of them where taken in Seattle prior to Washington becoming a state. They are of the original Hole in the Wall Gang and the second picture is of five of their ladies. The thing is that these are basically unknown and where the photographers proofs considering all the others including Big Nose Kate, Doc Holiday and others. I wanted to add them to the Hole in the Wall Gang article but ended up here. So what can you suggest? Thanks! Jim — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArizEstates (talk • contribs) 04:30, 14 March 2015‎ (UTC)

You can find out about US copyright terms at Commons:Copyright rules by territory#United States. As you can see, it largely depends on if and when the photos were first published. If the photos are not in the public domain, licensing permission from the photographer's heirs is needed. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:37, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Tool for non-wmf wiki bulk upload

Hi,

our wiki at wikiskripta.eu posseses some nice educational images. We are now revising our collection for copyvios, duplicities etc. and in meantime we encounter many useful images that could be further used. I checked out some upload tools, but I did not find a suitable one that would make the transition easy. I was thinking that there would be some equivalent to Flickr2commons, but for non-WMF wikis. Could you point me to the right tool/script? Thanks. --Wesalius (talk) 06:56, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

The thing with Flickr is that its file descriptions have a well-defined structure, and the license selection is limited. Mediawiki file descriptions are essentially free form. Therefore, bulk uploads from other wiki sites running Mediawiki is not necessarily simpler than from other sites, apart from the fact that if you manage the website, you may be able to export your site's metadata without resorting to screen scraping. Apart from ensuring that the copyright information is correct, the main task would be to ensure that the templates and their parameters used on file description pages on the source site are mapped to appropriate templates here on Commons. See Commons:Guide to batch uploading for more information. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:57, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

About Engineering College

"Aravali Institute of Technical Studies (AITS), Udaipur is today amongst first choice for all engineering students as one of the Best Engineering College in Udaipur region. Since its establishment in 2004, Aravali group pursue excellence with clear motive of imparting Best Teaching, Best Placements, Best Training & Best Infrastructure. Aravali group has been awarded with the Education Leadership Award in year 2012 & again in 2013 for being the Best engineering college with special achievements in the field of placements in Udaipur region, Rajasthan. AITS is also awarded with Bharat Shiksha Ratna Award in 2013 and honoured by Jammu and Kashmir Peace Foundation. Aravali College boasts of having highly qualified & experienced faculty. A large numbers of students are admitted every year through various competitive examinations AIEEE, RPET, RMCAAT, GATE in B.Tech., M.Tech., M.C.A. & Diploma. Aravali group is committed to provide excellent academic environment with Workshops, Seminars, Guest Lectures, Personality Development Sessions, Corporate interactions, Research and Sports Activities." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aravali Engineering College (talk • contribs) 05:10, 16 March 2015‎ (UTC)

@Aravali Engineering College: This is Wikimedia Commons, an image collection that serves Wikipedia. We do not host articles here. You can go to Articles for creation on the English Wikipedia to write your article. However, you should first read its FAQ for organizations. Anon126 (✉ ⚒) 05:17, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

may be uploades link to his website www.kcjoshigict.webstarts.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaustubh chandra joshi (talk • contribs) 02:07, 17 March 2015‎ (UTC)

to link my website also — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaustubh chandra (talk • contribs) 03:14, 17 March 2015‎ (UTC)

Not sure what you're asking, but the purpose of Commons is to collect free, educational media, not promotional links to websites. If that's not what you meant to ask about, Commons has users who speak a lot of different languages, so you might want to try asking in a language that you're more comfortable with. —LX (talk, contribs) 07:13, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

The file bhavin.jpg was removed from Wiki without notice

Hi,

Why was the file Bhavin.jpg removed from WikiCommons without notice? I have tried uploading the same picture, and it does not accept it. I thought WikiCommons was a place for free upload? Please look into this immediately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Biancadu17 (talk • contribs) 06:58, 17 March 2015‎ (UTC)

What do you mean "without notice"? You were given notice of the deletion discussion on your talk page. You apparently chose not to participate in it during the week that it was open, and it was deleted for the reasons described there. You should not attempt to recreate previously deleted content yourself, as that may lead to your account being blocked from uploading and editing. Instead, if you disagree with the deletion, you can request undeletion. —LX (talk, contribs) 07:19, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
I guess our volunteer response wasn't "immediate" enough, because I see you waited for a response for an entire five minutes before charging ahead and recreating it yourself anyway. Please don't do that again. —LX (talk, contribs) 07:23, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

upload

How do I upload a file without data charge? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.30.32.112 (talk • contribs) 10:33, 17 March 2015‎ (UTC)

You mean your ISP charges you extra based on the amount of data you transfer? That's really a matter between you and your ISP, and not something that Wikimedia Commons can do anything about. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:38, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

No subject

I would like to upload a picture, but I don't want others use it. How should I set when I upload the file? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Csma03 (talk • contribs) 05:00, 18 March 2015‎ (UTC)

Short answer: you can’t. The whole purpose of this site is to host media that everyone can use and share. There are lots of other places to publish pictures under terms that forbid or restrict reuse.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 07:04, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Upload from Flickr using the Upload Wizard, Unknown error: "permissiondenied".

Tracked in Phabricator
Task T93181

Hi

Just tried to use the new (at least I've not noticed it before) upload images from Flickr option in the Upload Wizard, which is really a wonderful tool to be available, I'm a regular user of Flickr2Commons, however I'm running in to a few issues.

  1. I can't seem to draw a box round the images, it just highlights everything and makes in have a blue background.
  2. When I click using ctrl to add more images it brings up my browsers context menu which makes things tricky.
  3. When I try to upload the images I get the message Unknown error: "permissiondenied".

For info I'm using Chrome that is up to date on a Mac and trying to upload images from the UK Department for International Development.

Thanks

--Mrjohncummings (talk) 00:38, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

I think you shouldn't see the upload-from-flickr button because you'll need the upload_by_url user right which is reserved to administrators, license reviewers and glam wiki toolset users (however you can apply for becoming a license reviewer). Without that user right, the servers do at least what they are supposed to - throwing a permission error. -- Rillke(q?) 01:02, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

I want files to be deleted

,I uploaded this two files but, actually I had confusion about copyright of these files. But, now I am completely sure that this files should not be public. And these files are intellectual property of someone else. I am quite ashamed of my nonsense act. I am really really sorry and want these file to be removed from Commons. Thanks in advance. And sorry again. --Sayom Shakib (talk) 10:41, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Files deleted by Fastily as requested. –Be..anyone (talk) 02:15, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

I have written a paragraph describing the career/research of Prof. Joseph Herbert of the Univ. of Cambridge, UK., which I request be uploaded/displayed at Wikipedia.

Joseph Herbert (born April 8, 1936) is Emeritus Professor of Neuroscience in the Department Clinical Neurosciences at the University of Cambridge. Prior to joining the Dept. of Anatomy at the University of Cambridge as a lecturer in 1971, Herbert was a lecturer in the the Dept of Anatomy at the University of Birmhingham. Herbert has been a fellow at Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge, since 1976. Herbert received a BSc. (Hons. Class I) in Anatomical Studies from the University of Birmingham in 1957 followed by a medical degree from the University of Birmingham in 1960 and a Ph.D. in neuroendocrinology from the University of London in 1965. Herbert was the Director of Training at the the University of Cambridge Centre for Brain Repair, (1992-2014) and a past president (1982) of the International Academy of Sex Research.

Herbert’s research interests have included the hormonal regulation of social and courtship behaviors in non-human primates, the neural and endocrine regulation of circadian and circannual reproductive cycles in ferrets and hamsters, the actions of neuropeptides and steroid hormones on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal stress axis in animals and man, and the neuroendocrine factors involved in human affective disorders and stress-related illness. He has published more than 250 peer-reviewed papers on these topics. Herbert has also published two books, including ‘The Minder Brain’ (World Scientific Publishing Co., 2007) and ‘Testosterone: Sex, Power and the Will to Win’ (Oxford University Press, 2015).

In the course of his career, Herbert has served as the Ph.D. supervisor or Post-doctoral mentor of several distinguished British neuroscientists, including Barry Everitt, Alan Dixson, Angela Roberts, Barry Keverne, Michael Hastings, and David Abbott. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael J Baum43 (talk • contribs) 17:29, 19 March 2015‎ (UTC)

If you look at the address bar of your browser, you'll note that the site you are on right now is commons.wikimedia.org, not en.wikipedia.org. Making sure you know what site you're on is good practice for many reasons, not least to avoid becoming the victim of phishing scams. If you wish to contribute content to Wikipedia, a good first step would be to head over there. Wikimedia Commons (this site) is a repository of free, educational media files (photos, diagrams, videos, audio files etc.) used by Wikipedia, other Wikimedia projects, and others. Plain text biographic content is outside of our project scope. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:10, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
@User:Michael J Baum43, I went ahead and created w:Joseph Herbert; please feel free to improve it as you see fit. Cheers! BD2412 T 18:42, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

how to replace a large batch of png files with svg

hi. i have a large batch of png files in the category AYIL MESHULASH that i'd like to replace with their respective svg files. I try batch upload with the wizard but it won't allow me as long as the previous files are existing. any suggestions on a qiuck way of replacing and updating the files?--Roxette5 (talk) 09:23, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

You can’t overwrite files of one format with another. What you can do is upload the SVGs with slightly different names (appending “vector“ or “redrawn” perhaps), and tag the corresponding PNGs with {{Vector version available}}, thereby linking them to the new files. See File:Basketball_key.png for an example.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 00:42, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Upload Photo

Hi, I would like to upload my own photo to Wikipedia. For the legal setting, could I prohibit others using the photo? thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Csma03 (talk • contribs) 02:19, 20 March 2015‎ (UTC)

Hi again, @Csma03: (Please sign your posts by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end.) If your photo meets the non-free content criteria and you provide a fair use rationale, it may be acceptable on the English Wikipedia, while allowing you to retain the copyrights. But the rules are quite strict, and generally require that the image be used in an article and irreplaceable by free content. Regardless, we can’t accept such conditions here; see COM:Licensing.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 05:02, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. @Odysseus1479 How about if it is a company logo? csma03 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Csma03 (talk • contribs) 11:19, 20 March 2015‎ (UTC)
Again, please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes. Company logos are no different from any other content, so again, if you don't want others to use your content, don't upload it to Commons. If you have questions about uploading non-free content locally to a specific language edition of Wikipedia, you should ask them there. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:47, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
I might add that a licence that’s “free” WRT copyright doesn’t give reusers carte blanche to misrepresent the original work or its author, to violate the personality rights of a subject, or otherwise to break the law or act unethically. Specifically regarding corporate logos, being copyright-free (whether by virtue of a release or intrinsic ineligibility) does not obviate the protection of a trademark, or countenance any fraudulent use. So if your concerns are in this direction, you needn’t fear that your permission would extend to such abuses. OTOH mash-ups, parodies, defacements, and the like are allowed under free licences, as long as they don’t purport to have the company’s endorsement, which is certainly worth consideration in terms of corporate image … then again, ‘bad actors‘ are quite capable of ignoring restrictions on anything that’s in the public view, so the case can be made that copyright deters mainly legitimate or beneficial uses.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 00:26, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

HTML error uploading SVG file

I am trying to upload a new version of an image I created (File:Nautilus diagram-en.svg) but each time I do I get an error telling me that my SVG file contains some HTML code— somewhere— and therefore could not be uploaded. I then proceed to the FAQ page, where I am told that I "most likely" uploaded a JPG file with some extraneous metadata... Only I did not upload a JPG file, and there are no instructions about what I should do if I in fact uploaded an SVG file. I have tried this multiple times and am still at a loss. Preventing someone from uploading a file with HTML code attached is all well and good, but failing to provide an explanation about what to do when it happens is unacceptable. What am I to do? What is anyone to do under such circumstances? KDS4444 (talk) 12:38, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Please provide the exact error message (to help identify exactly which checks can trigger it), and if you can upload the file to some other site, that might help too. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:41, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Question

Hi. Can I replace this file here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kingkongedo38.jpg

with a better one? The scan is bigger and better quality and it has another picture from the same movie with it. I think it better illustrates the article showing the only 2 surviving fragments of the film. Here's the pic I want to replace it with. http://oi59.tinypic.com/2qnwc29.jpgGiantdevilfish (talk) 17:35, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Aside from the questionable PD rationale (stills from cinematographic works are not photos), you should not overwrite an image with a completely different image. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:35, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure those are in the PD, mainly because they were publicity stills put out to promote the film in various periodicals in 1933 and that predates 1946.Giantdevilfish (talk) 19:31, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

“Labeled for reuse”

Are Google images under “Labeled for reuse” acceptable for Upload to Commons? E.g. http://blog.acton.org/archives/20791-preview-rl-interviews-thomas-c-oden.html. Vejlefjord (talk) 17:54, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

No, only a subset of them. We require that modification and commercial use is allowed. And you can't trust Google's automated license detection blindly. I see nothing at http://blog.acton.org/archives/20791-preview-rl-interviews-thomas-c-oden.html suggesting that the photo is anything but completely non-free. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:28, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Adding informations to a file uploaded

I have uploaded a file but some informations are wrong (date or coordinates for example). How to change these informations ? Thanks --Etienne Baudon (talk) 10:16, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Click on "Edit" at the top of the file description page and edit it just like any other wiki page. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:30, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

I am trying to upload the logo of Fictravel, a site made by me and the logo was also made by me in GIMP, and I have copyrighted it because it's part of Fictravel identity. But I can't upload it to Commons in that case, as copyrighted (fair-use of course) works can only be uploaded if they are work of others. Can you help? Antiv31 (talk) 07:26, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Non-free fair use content isn't allowed at all on Commons, regardless of who created it, so if you are not willing to publish it under a free license, you can't upload it here. It's likely outside the project scope of Commons anyway, because I can't see what possible educational use there would be for a logo of a personal website with no apparent notability. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:14, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Messed up file name

Moved from Commons talk:Upload help#Messed up file name.—Odysseus1479 (talk)

Hi. Could someone with permissions correct the file name for this one I uploaded, please ? : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Almshouses_-_Belton_%28nr_Grantham%29%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6...jpg Apologies and many thanks. Acabashi (talk) 19:42, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

@Acabashi: I believe {{Rename media}} would be appropriate here. Anon126 (✉ ⚒) 20:06, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
  • I can rename the file, but what should it be renamed into? Do you just want to have some dots removed, or is there anything else which should be changed at the same time? --Stefan4 (talk) 20:55, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
@Stefan4: Many thanks for that. If you can just remove the annoying dots it will be fine. Cheers. Acabashi (talk) 20:59, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Is it ok this way, now? --McZusatz (talk) 21:32, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

No subject

mit welcher Lizenz muss ich eine Landkarte von openstreetmap (share alike Lizenz 2.0)von mir ergänzt und bearbeit mit weiteren Daten abspechern / Which kind of licence do I need if I used a map of open street map (osm) and amended it with own data (osm is running under share alike licence 2.0)

I do not care about own rights --Torwall (talk) 15:26, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

The Share-Alike requirement means that any derivative works must be published under the same license as the original. You should also specify which changes you've made to the content. I'd recommend using {{OpenStreetMap}} instead of {{Information}} on the file description page. The easiest way is to use the basic upload form, but you could also use the Upload Wizard and edit the file description afterwards. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:17, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Uploading a photo my own work ....

Hello .... I am trying to upload a picture of parvathy nair https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parvathy_Nair ... I have few pictures of her.I have taken those pictures. but I tried to upload and its deleting always .I tried my all ways .. if you can check the history of her page you can understand... How I can upload her picture permanently ... pls help me out... Advance thanks. .. --Abhinand1234 (talk) 05:44, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

As you've been told repeatedly at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Parvathy nair.jpg, User talk:Túrelio/Archive9#PARO2, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Abhinand1234, Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2015-03#File:Story Kathe.jpg and User talk:Yann/archives 23#Copyright violations, you cannot upload photos you found on the Internet or screenshots of non-free videos to Commons, and you certainly can't claim that you have created such pictures yourself. Since you've uploaded several copyright violations, any authorship claims you make are likely to be called into question unless you upload full-resolution photos that you actually created yourself, that have intact metadata and that have not been previously published. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:27, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Digital versions of old maps

Is it permissable to upload a digital recreation (.svg file) of an old map? I created the digital file that will be uploaded using a photograph of a map that was on public display at Cuvu Railway Station, Fiji as a reference. The only identifying marks on the original map are the initials P.F.D. The subject of the map is the Rarawai-Kavanagasau Light Railway in Fiji. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrmification (talk • contribs) 10:06, 24 March 2015‎ (UTC)

If your version is a derivative work (i.e. it uses creative elements from the original, and yes, that can be quite a difficult call to make), then the original map must either be published under a free license (unlikely) or in the public domain for your version to be uploaded here. Determining whether or not the original is in the public domain can probably be quite tricky. Key questions typically include when and where it was first published, and if/when the author died. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:10, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

wikimedia commons image deleted

I have a photograph of a person to be uploaded on a wikipedia page that belongs to him.I copied the photo from his own website.He gave me permission to post the photo.It has been deleted by wikipedia within an hour.I requested for undeletion.But What should i do to make them believe that the i actually have the permission to post his photo? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhargav 123 (talk • contribs) 14:17, 31 March 2015‎ (UTC)

You're going to get the same answer here and on Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Kutikuppala_Surya_Rao.jpg that you posted 11 minutes apart:
Please follow the procedure described at Commons:OTRS to obtain proper permission. Do note that "permission to the photo" is not sufficient for Wikimedia Commons (this site) to host it. What's needed is a permission from the copyright holder (usually the photographer rather than the subject of a photo) to publish the photo under a license that allows anyone to use, modify and redistribute it for any purpose, including commercial purposes. I'm marking this thread as resolved to avoid further crossposting. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:17, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: —LX (talk, contribs) 16:17, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Major issues with "Upload file" page

I have some major issues and questions with the "Special page" called "Upload file" that I get to when clicking "Upload a new version of this file". I think the page needs serious revision...

1. This paragraph is extremely confusing and almost incorrect:

Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. In addition, claims of fair use are explicitly NOT and will NEVER be permitted on Commons. [end quote]

Fair use justification is used all over the place on Wikipedia. The fair use justified images seem to be links to other webpages (such as the top logo on Star Trek). If someone doesn't investigate this like I did and notice that the source is another website, they would have no idea why the above paragraph is being so strict denying fair use images. They would think the fair use images are uploaded images, not links, making the above paragraph incredibly confusing. It should be changed to note this discrepency, e.g. to include this sentence somewhere:

Images on Wikipedia justified by Fair Use use external links, they are not user-uploaded files.

2. There's nothing noting how to get back to the page. If I didn't remember what I clicked to get to the page I'd have know idea how to get back to it. It should have a little box "Shortcuts: WP (etc)" or "COM (etc)".

3. The entire top of the page is information about initially posting, not revising/updating images. There actually is no information on the image updating page about updating images! It has a field called "File changes:" placed under the partially-irrelevant information on initially or generally uploading a file, but it isn't explained. The top actually mentions a "dropdown box" ("In any case, you have to select the appropriate license in the dropdown box or add one below the summary") and there is no dropdown box on the page.

4. The page says the fields Information, Description, Source, Date, Author, Permission, and other_versions need to be filled out, but only the last is optional. Why should information about "other versions" be something that is optional when updating another version of the file? This is backwards to the purpose of the page. It actually says in red neon letters that an image will be deleted without appropriate information, but which of this information need to be updated, and how? Do I stick the revised bracket code (I forget what it's called) in the "File changes" box? And is "other versions" supposed to include previous versions?

5. Can I update the filename/filetype? I don't know anything about .svg files (original format), and I'd rather not go through a learning process and download new software. I'd like to upload in .png. Gimp doesn't recognize .svg.
(I'm revising the file because it contained confusing transparencies. It contains black text on transparent background, this means that whenever anybody opens it in any web browser, media viewer, or image editing program with a default black background (a lot of them), the text will not show up. I've modified the file by flattening the transparency to black and making the text white.)
This is the file as it exists now online in the URL:

Piano_Frequencies.svg

This is the file as it downloaded (note it's a different filetype, .png, that the URL, .svg). I didn't change anything.

520px-Piano_Frequencies.svg.png

This is the filename I'd like to upload:

520px-Piano_Frequencies_non-transparent-background-more-portable-than-earlier-versions.png

There is a field "Destination filename", is this where to save the above image uploaded from my hard drive? If so the image type would disagree with the .svg extension in the URL.

6. In general with Creative Commons, if I revise others' images, should I credit myself as the updater? This is a trivial update, so I don't care, so should I strictly note for reference in the "File changes" that I do not need to be credited for the update (i.e. are people otherwise required to credit me)? Thanks for any help! Honestly, I think the page should explain all of this :-/ Squish7 (talk) 17:48, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

I was trying to address 3 but there are cabals on Gerrit who will only let me proceed if the changes I propose fit into their strategy. Please suggest your changes on MediaWiki talk:Uploadtext. -- Rillke(q?) 20:19, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi User:Squish7! For reference, this is about Special:Upload. This was the upload page before the Upload Wizard became the default process for new uploads. We also have a "portal" to a few different "flavors" of Special:Upload for different use cases; this portal is found at Commons:Upload. Because the Wikimedia Foundation's developers kind of ran out of steam halfway through developing the new Upload Wizard, it's missing support for a lot of key use cases, such as uploading new versions of files. That's why when you click the "Upload a new version of this file" link on a file description page, you get dropped into the old, more versatile (but arguably more complex) upload form.
  1. The paragraph is not incorrect. Fair use content is permitted over on some Wikipedia projects under specific circumstances, but not here on Commons. Such content is locally hosted on those other projects.
  2. I suspect not many people actively go to this page or have a need to do so. Usually you arrive either by clicking "Upload a new version of this file" or via Commons:Upload (which does list shortcuts).
  3. Very valid point. Unfortunately, as Rillke mentioned, without the support of the Wikimedia Foundation's developers there's little we can do to have the page show different information depending on whether you arrived at the form directly (in which case the current information on it applies) or whether you clicked an "Upload a new version of this file" link.
  4. This is information that only applies if you went to Special:Upload directly and selected the basic upload form option. In the basic upload form, the text you enter is used to create the file description page. In that case, the other_versions part is used to link to other versions uploaded under different file names to give people a choice of which version to use. When you upload a new version of an existing file, it is only used to create a comment in the file history, the different versions are stored under the same name and only the latest version can be used directly. For example, here, the uploader entered "change" in the field when uploading the new version. As with the previous point, it simply shouldn't be displayed if you arrived there by clicking an "Upload a new version of this file" link.
  5. Yes, but in that case, you should not use the "Upload a new version of this file" link. Instead, upload the new version under a different name just like you would upload an entirely new file. Mention the author of the original file. It's a good idea to use the same license as the original, and it may be required (e.g. if the original is published under a license with the Share-Alike requirement as is the case with File:Piano Frequencies.svg). Link to the original as the source. You can always edit the file description after uploading to tidy up any details, and feel free to ask for help here. The file will be much more usable if you stick to the SVG format. What you want to do is not difficult, and you can do it with a plain text editor (like Notepad, gedit or vim). All you'd have to do is add <rect fill="#fff" width="520" height="100"/> before the first <rect> line to add a white rectangle in the back. The same thing was done with File:Sinnbild Wanderer.svg to create File:Sinnbild Wanderer bgw.svg.
  6. If the changes you made are simple and/or you don't care about being attributed as author, it's always a good idea to make that explicitly known. You need to mention the original author, and you should mention that the file has been modified from the original. You can use {{Retouched picture}} to point this out.
—LX (talk, contribs) 22:02, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
To re-iterate on 3. - phab:T91889
When a file description page exists at the specified destination (no matter whether a file exists under that name), MediaWiki will discard all input data except the summary/description field, and the file of course: The file will be overwritten with the summary/description field being used for the log entry and the Comment field.
If the wpForReupload parameter is set, the Destination filename field can't be changed by the user. This is the case for the links you follow through upload a new version of this file
Only the Destination file name initially passed to the upload form through the wpDestFile parameter is available as a variable on MediaWiki:Uploadtext.
Unfortunately MediaWiki also displays links with the wpForReupload not set. This is the case on file-less file description pages and when showing non-existing files (w.o. description and file). In this case the user is able to amend the destination file name.
The question now is whether it would be helpful to run an {{#ifexist:$1|true|false}}-check (checks for the description page, not the file; $1 being the wpDestFile parameter) and if it exists, show a different text than the standard upload text and if additionally the file exists (possible to check with Lua) show a warning about overwriting existing files. Now we just need to agree on that points and have a text written up. -- Rillke(q?) 22:57, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Phew. Wow, thank you so much for your thorough replies! Here are some rebuttals, if you willː

1. I said almost incorrect. E.g., the word "here" in "not permitted here" can easily be interpreted by someone not paying close attention to the URL or the upper left logo, as "this place that you're surfing". After a half day quantifying these problems in the above post, I have just realized that there are different processes to upload on Wikipedia and Wikimedia. I thought the upload process I was talking about was for both entities. I've been a WP editor for years, what hope does a new user have of figuring this out if they're not paying rapt attention to the upper left logo or the single character difference between wikiPedia and wikiMedia in their browser bar? Webpages have different content on them; it's absolutely normal for there to be different images on different webpages. A change in a small image to the upper left shouldn't signify you're suddenly at a completely different project. The file path from the Wikipedia article image goes directly to the commons.wikimedia image details. The user actually has to be staring at their URL bar and notice the URL has changed domains when they click "More details" on the Wikipedia.org image. Consider this click path:
Wikipedia page: [Piano_key_frequencies]
>> Click on image of piano >>
[Wikipedia summary of image]
>> Click on "More details" >>
This changes domains from wikipedia to wikimedia to go to the main Commons file page for the imageː
[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Piano_Frequencies.svg]

For the clause at hand to be correct, the definition of "here" literally has to have changed between before and after clicking "More details" on the image. It is very easily interpreted that "here" should apply to "this place where you're viewing this single image". So from the point of view of that click path, the paragraph is incorrect.

2. You've both described a lot about the (shifting) infrastructure. I don't have time to sift through it all and explore everything (combing help pages that explain your terminology I'm unfamiliar with), but as for this issue (how to get back to pages), let me make a point I compiled information for before the previous two posts in this thread (it's still generally relevant):

The following are 9 different upload pages across Wikipedia and Wikimedia, including the page I've been posting about (listed 1st), and others you've been talking about. (Some are extremely similar.) Looking at them grouped together (e.g. clicking each one successively), one can see very clearly just how convoluted this infrastructure is. Note that only one (the 2nd) has the convenient "Shortcuts:" box to the upper right. If all 9 had that box, at least people could get back to the page they landed at, however they got there. Perhaps this is one thing that could be easily changed to help people sift throughout all this confusion? The click paths are so confusing. People with ADHD like me could literally click around in circles for entire days trying to find a page they were at but can't find again:

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]

3. @LX: If the page can't show different information based on the arrival method, then can the text of the blurb be modified to accompany either one, e.g. with things like:

If you are updating a file, then...(etc)

In general, most of the issues I raised in my OP could be addressed by altering that blurb, e.g. this line could be used to clarify the Fair Use issue:

(Fair Use is only utilized on Wikipedia via uploads and external links, it is NOT utilized in ANY manner here in the Wikimedia Commons library.)

Simple things like this would help other people avoid all these confusions that I've had. I guess I'm still confused on what is easily done, and what would be involved or impossible. @Rillke: This is getting a bit too heavy for me. :-). I initially thought I was addressing issues with a single page, not this entire fluid infrasture. I don't even understand the correct page structure for discussing these issues. (At your suggestion to move the discussion to MediaWiki talk:Uploadtext, I actually deleted my OP with intention to move/revise it, then I saw LX's reply revived it, so I replied here.) Is this still the wrong place to be having this discussion? I don't have time to go through a learning process, however I'd like to know I at least lodged my concerns with the widest spectrum of users who may find them useful at some point.

Maybe a lot of this boils down to a base convolution of the Wikipedia/Wikimedia infrastructure. If the domains are changing at random during the viewing of the exact same image, maybe the core interactions need to be addressed. Maybe transitional boxes should appear like:

You are now at Wikimedia Commons. Click here to go back to Wikipedia.

Things like that would solve a lot of these issues. Is there a talk page for suggesting something that basic? Or should I just give up at this point and go back to my daily life? :-) This place can really be an ADHD vortex! (Aside, note that just now I said "this place" instinctively to refer to both WP and here; after years of editing WP, and recent research of Creative Commons, I think of wikipedia.org and commons.wikimedia.org as "one place". It's in that sense that the Fair Use clause in point 1. is "incorrect".)

4. 5. 6. @LX: Thank you so much for this feedback! I've added the <rect> code line to the svg image and emailed it to the author listed in the comments within the svg image. I was about to upload/update but then I figured maybe he should do it so as not to have a 2nd user on the file history. (If he doesn't respond after a bit, I'll just upload the image; I don't know if the email is active.) This wasn't my first thought because the account user:AlwaysAngry from which the image was uploaded from is pretty vacant.

In retro, this is what I spent my whole day doing. I never would have planned it. I'm trying to remind myself that 3 billion people have access to this image, so I'm doing some good for everybodyǃ This is why we all do this stuff... Squish7 (talk) 08:21, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

  1. is a consequence of the Media Viewer not providing a clear indication that "More details" leads to another site, which I agree is bad, even if people would do well to make sure they know what site they're on at all times to avoid becoming the victim of phishing scams. I have disabled the Media Viewer, so instead, I see this below the image instead: en:MediaWiki:Sharedupload-desc-here. I think that's much clearer. I guess "not permitted here" could be changed to "not permitted here on Commons" to make things clearer, though.
  2. I totally agree that the jungle of upload forms is confusing. Not all of your examples are relevant for visiting directly (MediaWiki:Uploadtext is just the place where text included on actual upload pages resides; it's not an actual upload page itself). Others require additional information to be passed in ways that isn't technically supported by the shortcut redirects.
  3. Adding even more instructions to that page is not exactly optimal, but it may be our only solution for now, yes. I'll have a think about it and make some suggestions at MediaWiki talk:Uploadtext, which is the page for specific feedback and suggestions. For now, I think this is the best page page to straighten out question marks and sort ideas out. As for notices when moving between different Wikimedia sites (Commons, different language editions of Wikipedia, Wiktionary, etc.), I'd like to see something like an explanation with an "OK" button and a "don't show this again" checkbox, but that would require support in the Mediawiki software (so it's not something that we could easily do ourselves).
Thanks for taking the time to work through all this and for commenting. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:55, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
No prob, thank you tooǃ Any repliers from here onː Please ping me with [[User:Squish7]] if you would like me to see your post or respond. Squish7 (talk) 20:42, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Upload help, Flickr to Commons

So over on WP I'm in the process of improving the article Partial capo. It currently has no pictures. Commons currently has only this image, which is not exactly what I'd like. So I tried FIST. The picture "Capo Dual capo 272" from Flickr looks useful, but I have no idea how to go about uploading it. Help welcome. :) Eman235 (talk) 22:34, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

They are now in Category:Capo. Next time, choose the Upload to Commons using Flickr2Commons, open authorise first! in a new tab, authorize the application at MediaWiki and finally Transfer selected files to Commons. That should be all. -- Rillke(q?) 23:00, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Thank you! Eman235 (talk) 23:14, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

ARTES PLASTICAS

El arte es una actividad enriquecedora, positiva e indispensable para el BIEN-SER, EL BIEN-ESTAR Y EL BIEN-VIVIR de cualquier individuo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maria angeles hidalgo (talk • contribs)

Is that a question about uploads? Maybe you are looking for the Commons:Café (español). –Be..anyone (talk) 07:37, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Alan Turing

Hi! This image can be uploaded: http://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/mar/06/alan-turing-exhibition-enigma-codebreaker Tambo (talk) 06:57, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Yes, and if public domain is true there is a slightly bigger (634x857 instead of 620x372) DailyMail version. Have fun with the upload, put it in Category:Alan Turing, please. –Be..anyone (talk) 07:31, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Thank you! Tambo (talk) 10:24, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Upload stops after 65 seconds

Tracked in Phabricator
Task T92790

I have a very slow connection (384/64kps) and the upload repeatedly stops after 65 seconds with the message: Unknown error: "unknown". --Ryukia (talk) 14:18, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

The Upload Wizard (the default interface for uploading files to Commons) is pretty much in a perpetual state of brokenness. It isn't broken for everyone all the time, but I don't recall a time since it was introduced that we went more than a few days without people reporting enigmatic problems with indefinitely spinning wheels, unhelpful error messages, or simply no way to move forward. Have you tried Commons:Upload? It tends to be much more reliable. —LX (talk, contribs) 23:37, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
@LX: I doubt this will help here; in the post above someone tried Special:Upload and the result was a blank page. Probably some proxy or file backend error this time. -- Rillke(q?) 00:05, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
@Ryukia: Is this still happening for you? Luckily there are a few engineers how at least care if we report details now. -- Rillke(q?) 11:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Yes, I still have the problem. I also tried Special:Upload but after the same amount of time (ca 65 seconds) the upload stops. Maybe it's a server setting how long php-scripts are allowed to run... Whatever upload tool I use, the upload starts normaly, I can monitor that traffic is transfered, the progress bar in the new tool moves, but both uploads tools stop after 65 seconds and the upload is aborted. --Ryukia (talk) 14:51, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
@Ryukia: on Special:Upload, how does it look like when the upload is aborted? Is it a blank page or some error message or just the same page loading again? Or does the browser simply cancel the request and an error page (like timeout) is shown? Trying the same now... -- Rillke(q?) 15:13, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
It's just the same page as when I started the upload. I didn't see any error message, just the green moving circle in the Firefox tab that indicates traffic transfer stops and on the traffic monitor I can see that the upload stopped.
To make sure that the problem isn't on my side (router, virus software etc) I uploaded the same file to a Coppermine Gallery on one of my servers and it was saved there without a problem. Thanks for your efforts to solve the problem! --Ryukia (talk) 16:16, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Wow, that's a lot, thanks. Are you using Mozilla Firefox? If so, could you open the network tab (Ctrl+⇧ Shift+I, then select the network tab [possibly has to be enabled first through the gear icon]) before submitting the upload form and tell us the result? That'd be very helpful (possibly). We regret the inconveniences. -- Rillke(q?) 21:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Help me out! My uploads runs as fast as possible, but the text: "Unknown error: unknown" always be displayed while I have uploaded any files! I am using Mozilla Firefox for uploading files for this site. Alqhaderi AliffianikoWicara 11:19, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

@Ryukia and Alqhaderi Aliffianiko: Which browsers and operating systems do you use/ in which of them does the described error occur. -- Rillke(q?) 22:56, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Trying to upload a photo that has been "deleted"

I am trying to update my company's website, but it won't allow me to upload pictures. This picture is what I want to upload: Roboy

It says that I can't upload it because it was on a page before that was deleted. Can someone please explain to me how to fix this?

Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serena dulong (talk • contribs) 21:08, 15 March 2015‎ (UTC)

@Serena dulong: Hi, I've no idea what your problem was, but I put all "roboys" here in a category:roboy, and a big 14 MB version of your picture already exists here as File:Roboy_270213_4.jpg. Please holler if you still want to upload the small 344 KB version, and it still fails. –Be..anyone (talk) 02:39, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Upload

My recent attempts to upload images don't finish. Has something changed in the process procedures? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pi3.124 (talk • contribs) 11:31, 28 March 2015‎ (UTC)

The Upload Wizard (the default interface for uploading files to Commons) is pretty much in a perpetual state of brokenness. It isn't broken for everyone all the time, but I don't recall a time since it was introduced that we went more than a few days without people reporting enigmatic problems with indefinitely spinning wheels, unhelpful error messages, or simply no way to move forward. You may wish to try Commons:Upload, which tends to be much more reliable. That said, there also seems to be general site issues with intermittent timeouts for the past few weeks (usually lasting only a couple of minutes at a time). —LX (talk, contribs) 14:16, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Date of a derivative

I made a cropped version of the image File:Alberto santos dumont.jpg and I want to upload it (it would be more suitable for a table than the original). The page of the parent image lacks the date of creation, though the file is labelled as being in public domain for being old. What date should I ascribe to the derivative image. Эйхер (talk) 13:19, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Given that the source information for File:Alberto santos dumont.jpg/File:Alberto Santos Dumont 02.jpg does not contain enough information to verify the PD rationales (which differ between the two different versions of the photo), I've initiated deletion discussions for both. I'd refrain from uploading derivatives unless the uploaders or a third party manages to demonstrate that the photo really is in the public domain. Thanks for raising the question. If you're looking for alternatives, there's a properly sourced portrait at File:Alberto Santos-Dumont portrait.jpg. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:07, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

How to delete a link sticked into a template - Me quedó "pegada" una instrucción de subida en una plantilla... ¿Sabe alguien cómo sacarla?

Today I started and almost finished a new article, , https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Binswanger I had to use the template "person" (not "scientist") because of some reason, and almost everything went OK. But a word, "245px", got sticked to the template, with a link to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:UploadWizard?uselang=es&wpDestFile=Binswanger.JPG_y_Otto_Binswanger_as_20-year-old_student.jpg

Namely, with a link toward a uploading wizard related with TWO images that the article uses OUTSIDE of the template. I cannot figure how to delete such an invasive sticked instruction, "245px". Might somebody kindly instruct me how to erase it? Best,--Muchay (talk) 21:24, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Spanish translation: Hoy empecé y casi terminé una página nueva, https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Binswanger. Debí usar la plantilla de "persona", porque en la de "científico" no pude insertar todos los datos que necesitaba, y casi todo anduvo muy bien. Pero me quedó pegada la leyenda "245px" con vínculo a https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:UploadWizard?uselang=es&wpDestFile=Binswanger.JPG_y_Otto_Binswanger_as_20-year-old_student.jpg

O sea, con vínculo a dos figuras que empleo fuera de la plantilla. Y no se me ocurre como llegar a retirarla. ¿Podría alguno desasnarme, por favor? --Muchay (talk) 21:13, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

I believe the problem is that the template is missing an “image” parameter, and I guess the red link is to invite users to upload one. I expect that adding a picture will solve the problem.
Google-español: Creo que el problema es que la plantilla le falta un parámetro "imagen", y supongo que el enlace rojo es invitar a los usuarios a subir uno. Espero que la adición de una imagen va a resolver el problema.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 21:51, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Yes, now that you say it, it appears very reasonable; I´m grateful for your pointing it to me. But I cannot accept the template´s invitation and upload the TWO images the template "expects". First, because it asks for two images united by way of a bad-formatted conjunction (the Spanish word for "and"). Such a pair isn´t uploadable, I believe. Second, because doing an uploading from a template sends the uploader to other pages. Where should the template keep the modification? Hope it doesn´t inflict the "245 px" expression to anybody that attempts to use it... Should we try to edit the template itself? Later, --Muchay (talk) 23:05, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
I don’t know how or why the link is combining two filenames. But try moving just one of the existing images into the infobox, whichever best represents the subject: I expect the link will then disappear.
Google-español: No sé cómo ni por qué el enlace es la combinación de dos nombres de archivo. Pero trate de mover sólo una de las imágenes existentes en la caja de información, lo que representa mejor el sujeto: Espero que el enlace será luego desaparecen.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 17:03, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Unbekannter Fehler: „unknown“

Tracked in Phabricator
Task T92790

Nach mehrfachen Versuchen eine einfache .jpg Datei hochzuladen bekomme ich immer wieder die Fehlermeldung Unbekannter Fehler: „unknown“. Ich bin ratlos, die Datei ist 2,1 MB groß und einfach nur ein Foto. Hab schon lange nichts mehr hochgeladen, irgendwie war das früher einfacher. --Creando (talk) 19:27, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

@Creando: Du kannst das alte Formular versuchen --> Special:Upload --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:32, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Vielen Dank für den Tipp, habe ich gleich probiert. Wenn man Datei hochladen klickt, erscheint unten "sende Anfrage an commens", nach einiger Zeit verschwindet das und es nichts passiert. Vielleicht darf man als Deutscher keine Dateien von Chile aus hochladen ??? --Creando (talk) 20:14, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
@Creando: . Doch doch - sollte funktionieren. Seltsam. Ich tippe das dein inet zu langsahm ist. Versuche es mal mit COM:Chunked uploads. --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:19, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Upload funktioniert bei mehr auch nicht mehr (ging sonst immer problemlos), weder mit dem alten, noch mit dem neuen Formular. Ich habe sonst keine Geschwindigkeitprobleme und bin auch nicht in Chile.--KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:37, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

@KaiBorgeest and Creando: Besteht das Problem immer noch? Was bedeutet nach einiger Zeit verschwindet das und es nichts passiert - heißt das, dass weiterhin die gleiche Seite angezeigt wurde oder wurde eine leere Seite angezeigt? Sonst irgendwelche weiteren Beobachtungen? WMF Engeneers sind dankbar für alle Benachrichtigungen. -- Rillke(q?) 11:13, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Auch hier und im Commons-Chat wurde ähnliches Problem schon diskutiert, ohne bislang eine Lösung zu finden. Gruß --Asio 18:01, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Problem besteht noch:

Unbekannter Fehler: „unknown“

Das Hochladen aller Dateien ist fehlgeschlagen.

0 von 1 Datei hochgeladen.

Tritt sowohl mit Mozilla als auch IE auf.--KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:26, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

@KaiBorgeest and Creando: Eine letzte Bitte: Darf ich Euch in eure Benutzerskripte mein Hochladeskript schreiben und ihr versucht dann damit etwas hochzuladen? Nicht, dass ich denke, dass es damit klappt, aber mein Skript gibt wenigstens die genaue Fehlermeldung (inkl. Server) aus. Das wäre dann User talk:Rillke/bigChunkedUpload.js - aber ich gebe im Falle einer Zustimmung noch Instruktionen auf Deutsch. -- Rillke(q?) 00:07, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Bei mir funktioniert der Upload mit dem IE Version: 11.0.9600.17691, Updateversion 11.0.17. Zuvor den Bildupload mit Mozilla Firefox probiert und fehlgeschlagen. Drei-, vier- oder fünfmal neu den upload in Mozilla Firefox zu starten, damit es dann vielleicht beim vierten oder fünften Mal funktioniert, hatte ich diesmal keine Lust. Gruß --Asio 19:26, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Vicuna (mit gleicher Datei) funktioniert.--KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:56, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Wieder zurück in Deutschland mit schneller Internetverbindung ging das Hochladen reibungslos. Möglicherweise lag das Problem doch an den eher etwas langsamen (vor allem bei upload) und instabilen Netzanbindungen die ich Argentinien und Chile hatte ? --Creando (talk) 08:41, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Nach wie vor funktioniert ein Hochladen von Bildern mit Mozilla Firefox nicht mehr. "Senden der Anfrage an Commons" wird angezeigt und dann Abbruch. --Asio 18:43, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Beim 6ten Upload-Versuch hat es nun geklappt. Nicht zu verstehen. --Asio 18:47, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Habe seit einigen Tagen das identische Problem. Upload er UploadWizard zeigt Unknown Error, auch mehrfache Retry-Versuche bringen nur dieses Ergebnis. Es liegt nicht am Foto/Größe, habe verschiedene Bilder versucht. Im alten Formular stoppt der Upload einfach und zeigt mit das Formular an, als hätte ich nicht auf Hochladen geklickt. Ist sehr nervig, ich dachte, das gibt sich nach ein paar Tagen, aber Fehler ist immer noch da. Ich surfe mit Firefox. --Paulae (talk) 22:20, 21 March 2015 (UTC) PS: Der Fehler scheint mit Firefox (in jedem Fall neuste Version + letzte Version davor) in Verbindung zu stehen. Im IE funktioniert der Upload. --Paulae (talk) 22:37, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

So sieht eine andere Datei mit Chunked Upload aus:Hi, KaiBorgeest! Thank you for testing the beta version of User:Rillke/bigChunkedUpload.js.

00000: 1/1> in progress Upload: 82%

00046: 1/1> Server error 0 after uploading chunk: Response:

00046: 1/1> upload in progress Upload: 90%

00114: 1/1> Server error 0 after uploading chunk: Response:

00114: 1/1> upload in progress Upload: 90%

00182: 1/1> Server error 0 after uploading chunk: Response:

00182: 1/1> upload in progress Upload: 93%

00250: 1/1> Server error 0 after uploading chunk: Response:

00250: 1/1> upload in progress Upload: 90%

00317: 1/1> Server error 0 after uploading chunk: Response:

00317: 1/1> upload in progress Upload: 90%

Es folgte die Nachricht, der Upload sei "stuck", dann "finished", ging aber zu schnell, um den exakten Fensterinhalt noch vor dem automatischen Schließen zu kopieren.--KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:16, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

@KaiBorgeest: Wurde das Log von bigChunkedUpload.js unter DSL 16.000 oder mehr erzeugt? Könntest Du es nochmals mit vorher aktivierter Fehlerkonsole (Ctrl+⇧ Shift+K) probieren und mir die Fehlermeldungen, die nach Start des Hochladens auftreten zukommen lassen? -- Rillke(q?) 23:08, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
@KaiBorgeest, Paulae, Asio otus, and Creando: Unter welchen Betriebssystemen ist das Problem aufgetreten? Werden Proxies verwendet und welche AddOns sind aktiv? -- Rillke(q?) 23:08, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Wie zuvor bechrieben Firefox 36.0.4, Mozilla Firefox EU, euballot - 1.1 (Firefox ist aktuell) - AddOns auch wie zuvor, als alles noch funktionierte (Shockwave Flash Version 16.0.0.305 und Java(TM) Platform SE 8 U31 Version 11.31.2.13). Andere AddOns waren und sind nicht aktiviert (werden erst auf Rückfrage aktiviert, beispielsweise Microsoft Office, Acrobat, NVIDIA 3D pp). Alles unverändert zu dem Zustand, als der Bilderupload noch funktionierte. Keine Proxies. Netzgeschwindigkeiten 746 kBit/s download und 131 kBit/s upload. Das der Bildupload, wenn man lange genug Geduld zeigt, plötzlich beim 5ten oder 6ten Versuch funktioniert, erklärt sich mir leider nicht. IE 11 (aktuelle Version) funktioniert einwandfrei. --Asio 13:20, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Ich surfe mit Firefox 36.0.4, Betriebssystem ist Windows 8.1. Add-Ons sind seit geraumer Zeit identisch, habe ich also zwischen funktionieren/nichtfunktionieren nicht geändert (u.a. einige von Kaspersky, WOT). Auf IE 11 klappt der Upload. --Paulae (talk) 16:44, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Kleinere Datei wurde ohne Probleme hochgeladen, mein DSL ist unter 16000. Keine Fehler.--KaiBorgeest (talk) 23:21, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Nachdem vor ein paar Tagen der Upload nicht klappte, scheint nun wieder alles zu funktionieren. Habe mit dem alten Standardformular hochgeladen und es geht, mit dem neuen nur angetestet, aber auch da hat er das Bild angenommen und nicht wie vorher den Upload abgebrochen. Sehr schön, Commons ist wieder nutzbar. :-) Vielen Dank an alle, die in den letzten Tagen gewerkelt haben, um den Fehler zu finden! --Paulae (talk) 15:45, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Bei mir ist es ebenso. Nachdem ich von Paulae gelesen habe, dass es wieder funktionieren soll, habe ich es auch gleich mit zwei Bildern ausprobiert. Es klappte bei mir auch. Ich sage auch Danke an die im stillen Wirkenden und schließe mich den Worten von Paulae an. Gruß --Asio 21:03, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Como subir archivos desde flickr directamente, sin descargar la imagen a mi pc???

Como subir archivos desde flickr directamente, sin descargar la imagen a mi pc??? prefix:Commons:Upload help/Archive — Preceding unsigned comment added by Altorrijos (talk • contribs) 18:14, 31 March 2015‎ (UTC)

No creo que haya manera; siempre hay que bajar el archivo. Saludos, Simon Burchell (talk) 20:20, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Otro usuario ya confirmó que no se puede. Saludos, Simon Burchell (talk) 22:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
The question is: Is there any way to directly import an image from flickr without first saving it locally first? I don't believe there is but I've been wrong before! Simon Burchell (talk) 20:23, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
At this time, that is correct as far as regular users are concerned. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:13, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, Simon Burchell (talk) 22:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Upload_help/Archive/2015/03&oldid=156741545"