Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/WikiLoverFan1007
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
WikiLoverFan1007
[edit]- WikiLoverFan1007 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
[edit]- ThomasFan707 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Indonesia 2006 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- 918kaya.tech (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Monitor Animate (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- SpiderMan B1A (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- BFDIFan707 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: Similar name, same behavior. Yann (talk) 20:45, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
See also COM:ANV#Indonesia 2006. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:08, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
+ 918kaya.tech, new user creating nonsense DRs with spurious arguments. Yann (talk) 19:44, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Confirmed that Indonesia 2006 = ThomasFan707 = WikiLoverFan1007 = SpiderMan B1A. Declined is 918kaya.tech as, again, tacked on without appropriate evidence. Bad DR rationales are ten a penny, so "nonsense DRs with spurious arguments" is without genuine substance. Proper evidence could include, for example, diffs of identical/distinctive rationales (ThomasFan707; Indonesia 2006). 918kaya.tech, FWIW, also did not appear in the socks range, which is probably telling. Эlcobbola talk 20:52, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- And also Monitor Animate. Yann (talk) 16:22, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- If an overlapping DR rationale (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of the Republic of Molossia.svg) is taken as indicating socking, then look at GPinkerton (talk · contribs) and the remarkable list of such under the hatnote at Commons:Village_pump#Fantasy_Vs._Disputed_symbols. If it's joe jobbing, it's an odd one. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:05, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- After having been called out for repeated and blundering false accusations, this is the level you sink to? If joe-jobbing is at work, I would suspect none other than Andy Dingley, or another user on a mission to overturn COM:SCOPE and ensure Commons is replete with self-created faked flags and personal artwork despite the fact that COM:NOTHOST exists. GPinkerton (talk) 17:32, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- Would you care to explain why a prolific sockpuppet is copying your (rather peculiar and SELFIE-obsessed) DR rationales then? Andy Dingley (talk) 18:39, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- Please assume good faith here, trolls usually copy the styles of established users and then subvert it. I suspect that WikiLoverFan1007 saw GPinkerton's contributions and then just copied it to troll people. This is something trolls love to do, so please assume good faith in GPinkerton's case and don't assume that they're behind these troll nominations as there is no reason to suspect them of being so. Also, users can have similar styles of nominations and interests, to me GPinkerton looks similar to another user named "Antemister" but I wouldn't accuse them of being sockpuppets simply because of similar styles of nominating images for deletion and the same type of images (questionably sourced flags, or flags and other symbols whose inclusion they seem personally dislike). Accusations like these don't help anyone and only breed resentment. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:51, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- Despite your protracted and erroneous accusations, @Andy Dingley: , there is nothing peculiar about any of my deletion requests. You may not like the policy enforced when they have led to the files being deleted over your protestations, but there is nothing you can do about the policy, so I suggest you stop trying to blame me for what you imagine are its shortcomings. As for your ludicrous demand that I should explain the actions of others unknown, I won't bother responding except to point out its obvious absurdity and futility. GPinkerton (talk) 21:10, 2 October 2021 (UTC)The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.