Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/RiniX

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/RiniX}} to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

RiniX

Status: open • view • edit • history • watch
Filed: 07:23, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

• RiniX (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

Suspected related users

• 60.54.90.176 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RBL • tools • luxo's • crossblock • block user • block log • checkuser)

Rationale, discussion and results

Reason: RiniX uploaded File:Industrial Light & Magic Logo.png and File:20th Century Fox Logo.png, up for DR here and here, after which he asked for help here, here and here. The IP removed the deletion template on these two files. — Racconish^☎ 07:23, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

We cannot comment on the IP in this case. --Krd 08:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

What do you mean ? — Racconish^☎ 13:23, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

The request has to be declined because there is no way to answer it per wmf:Privacy policy and meta:Access to nonpublic information policy. --Krd 18:02, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

You know better than me that you don't have to disclose private information. Accepting the RCU if the reason is valid and publishing personal information are not the same. Now if you consider there is no sufficient ground to accept my request, I can only respect your better judgement. But please don't tell me it is never possible to accept a RCU with an IP. — Racconish^☎ 18:23, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.