Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by RiniX

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RiniX

Book cover art & map from the book, I'm not sure about the other two files (logo and symbol of the book series).

--Marek Koudelka (talk) 16:17, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The user says that he sent an email to OTRS and received reply (in February). I don't know more at the moment. --Marek Koudelka (talk) 16:52, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Today, I will send another email so just wait. RiniX (talk) 17:10, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: all 4 marked with {{OTRS pending}}. Daphne Lantier 20:35, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RiniX (talk · contribs)

Not below the theshold of originality as claimed.

— Racconish^☎ 14:06, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not below the threshold of originality as claimed. Thank you. But where is that problem? In text? In shapes? RiniX (talk) 14:14, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Artwork. — Racconish^☎ 14:26, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You think, that these logos aren't official or... ? RiniX (talk) 14:30, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The artwork is above the threshold of originality. — Racconish^☎ 14:32, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But that logos are from official sites, so... how can they be artworks. Horor film, It's same logo like on that site... And for example, why this isn't artwork? RiniX (talk) 14:36, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Because on Horor film is black and not white? I still don't understand. RiniX (talk) 14:38, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are opposing 2 unrelated aspects. If, for example, Warner Brothers is the owner of a composite logo which includes original artwork, then, because the artwork is original, it is copyright protected. On the other hand, if a logo is text only, they cannot claim for copyright protection on the design. — Racconish^☎ 14:41, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but on this picture is problem that the text or blood? Because I know what you mean, but this is only text too. File:Horor film Logo.png

The blood design is an original artwork. Another example : 20th century fox logo is notoriously the creation of Emil Kosa Jr. — Racconish^☎ 14:50, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So, they must send email for this too? Because A is an original artwork, but it still here. RiniX (talk) 14:56, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean A ? — Racconish^☎ 14:59, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A like the flAsh (+ that A has flash). It's same like this O with blood. RiniX (talk) 15:02, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't understand. Anyway, it seems I conveyed the idea. — Racconish^☎ 15:04, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So, here you can see the logo of the TV series Flash

. The Logo has a letter A with flash and I think, It's same like that O with blood. But I don't see, that he must sent some permissions. RiniX (talk) 15:09, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Up for DR too. — Racconish^☎ 15:17, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And this

Maybe, you can up for DR 25% of logos. RiniX (talk) 15:24, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is simple geometric shapes only. No need to be sarcastic. — Racconish^☎ 15:48, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But it's an original artwork too, because it's official logo of that company. And I don't want to be sarcastic, but I have a problem see a border between: What is and isn't original artwork. RiniX (talk) 15:55, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe this can help. — Racconish^☎ 15:59, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but. You want to delete it, I want to keep it. Is here something like middle men, who can write his opinion? RiniX (talk) 16:10, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete {{PD-textlogo}} is for logos like that of the New York Times, , which literally are just text. These images are text-based, yes, but each one's modified in an original manner. Nyttend (talk) 02:31, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment See also the discussion here. — Racconish^☎ 07:08, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Many of these would be eligible for Trademark protection but not copyright. I believe that File:Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them Logo.png and File:Horor film Logo.png are keeps per Copyright rules by subject matter:Trademarks. I would say File:Industrial Light & Magic Logo.png, regardless of it's prominence, would fall bellow TOO. Copyright threshold of originality for logos says itself several times that there is no standard and courts conflict. But one could argue that "The word “Arrows” with an arrow wasn’t copyrightable, because it was obvious to use that picture with that word and required no creativity." would apply to a light bulb on top of the words Industrial Light & Magic. I could see someone taking a much tighter interpretation unless I missed something and that's fine. It's simply my opinion. File:Reign Logo.png and File:Walden Media Logo.png are a bit of a toss up and a tight call but I would still think it's bellow TOO. Does leave me wishing this DR was split up though. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, none of the logos is simple, although some of them barely surpass threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 16:31, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by RiniX

Files uploaded by RiniX

Files uploaded by RiniX (talk · contribs)

Navigation menu

Search