Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Musée Annam

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Musée Annam}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Daeva Trạc

[edit]
[edit]

Rationale, discussion and results

[edit]

Reason: I’m kind of busy today, so I probably won’t be able to attend in the next 5-6 hours. Anyway, someone accused me to be the sock puppet of C/Đăng Đàn Cung/Musee Annam (that guy), so I request for an IP check for comparison (it seems that my uploads of Canadian landscapes and stuffs aren’t good enough).

Other of my defence included:

1.’Fake flags’: I asked before uploading and editing them

2. Haiphong and RVN Police flag: check the sources would ya

3. That guy have already bothered me

user Nguyentrongphu, you took every of my interest which C also had to accuse me, but any evidences that separated us apart and boom, “he was just faking”. What a win-win logic. And “confirmed sock”? You banned me immediately after I was accused as C in Viet Wikipedia. How the heck am I gonna defend myself when I have already shot dead?

After this has been done, I hope you and your friend would stop with such harassment against me. Consider this as I kneel down and beg. — Daeva Trạc (talk) 10:44, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • There's currently no issue here that needs a solution. "Running a check will only be done to combat disruption on Commons"--Daeva Trạc is not blocked, so what disruption would a check prevent? If Nguyentrongphu, or someone else, believes Daeva Trạc has been socking, they are welcome to present appropriate evidence of a connection and use of those accounts to disrupt the Commons. That would be a valid reason for a check. Эlcobbola talk 12:50, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Nguyentrongphu: the IPs in the ban discussion you referenced are Vietnamese. Can you elaborate on what you mean by "If Trạc's IP are from Canada"? Эlcobbola talk 19:28, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:elcobbola Trạc claims he's living in Canada. Musée Annam lives in Vietnam, so if Trạc's IPs are real and from Canada, then it's unlikely that he's Musée Annam. This is a problem because Musée Annam has caused a lot of trouble over the years to be global banned by the global community. Nguyentrongphu (talk) 01:48, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
“Same interest”? Should I go outside and call every artist “neo-nazist” for having one same interest with Hitler?
And for your information, I don’t have an “obsession” with fictitious flags. I have other topics that I take interest and spend way more time in for (see here). — Daeva Trạc (talk) 21:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Technically Unrelated/ Inconclusive. This may or may not be meaningful. Known socks are stale, and IPs, range allocations, devices, etc. all can change over time. Chronic LTAs are also more likely to understand how to manipulate the tool. This is one reason why Checkuser is not magic pixie dust.. Handling, if any, will need to be based on behaviour. Эlcobbola talk 14:14, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    User:elcobbola I understand that a lot of things can change over time. However, I just want to know if Trạc's IP are from Vietnam or Canada? Nguyentrongphu (talk) 00:15, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
    Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
    above, in a new section.



If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Musée Annam}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Musée Annam

[edit]
[edit]

Rationale, discussion and results

[edit]

Edited the same edits that were edited by previous accounts, all of which were reverted by bureaucrat. Previous accounts were globally locked. Artix Kreiger (talk) 14:45, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Musée Annam

[edit]
[edit]

Rationale, discussion and results

[edit]

Reason: Two accounts popped up after the block of Musee Annam. also made edits to vietnam edits with a large number of overlap Artix Kreiger (talk) 18:02, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I also should point that the 2 accounts have been blocked on Vietnamese Wiki. The 2nd was blocked for abuse on Enwiki. Artix Kreiger (talk) 04:02, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed, as well as:
All blocked, please review edits and uploads. --Krd 08:15, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Musée Annam

[edit]
[edit]

Rationale, discussion and results

[edit]

I've noticed that this account has been putting back fake Vietnamese flags created by Namkhanh02. This makes me suspect that it could be another sockpuppet... See Category:Sockpuppets of Namkhanh02. Thank you. Jean-Jacques Georges (talk) 16:18, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed and blocked. Please review edits and uploads. --Krd 18:21, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.