Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 17 2020
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Bunker 24 in the ammunition depot in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bunker 24 in the ammunition depot in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gable figures at Prinzipalmarkt 5, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaque at St Lambert's Church, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:12, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Überwasser cemetery, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:12, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eastern view of cathedral and monastery, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:54, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:07, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spire of the mortuary (Agony of Jesus Christ chapel) at the cemetery on Domplatz #1, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:54, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:07, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bay at the priory building, Domplatz #1, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:54, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:07, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of the defense tower at the fortification wall on Domplatz, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:54, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:09, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Barred window at the castellated defense tower at the fortification wall on Domplatz, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:54, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:09, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The inner hall of the "Music pavilion". Elagin island, 4P, South-East of Elagin Palace, near the 1st Elagin bridge, Petrogradsky district, Saint Petersburg --Александр Байдуков 02:23, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Acceptable, but f/20 is too much. The sharpness would be better at f/11 for example. DoF is good enough at f/11. You should reduce the midtone lights. --XRay 04:14, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Small range close to Yeats Ridge Hut --Podzemnik 00:56, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 02:15, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kaituna Valley, Canterbury --Podzemnik 00:56, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Maybe a little bit too much sky; generally for empty sky it is better to include less than 1/3. But still QI. --King of Hearts 02:15, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Packhorse hut, Canterbury --Podzemnik 00:56, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 02:15, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parasol mushroom (Macrolepiota procera) (1) -- George Chernilevsky 00:29, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:05, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parasol mushroom (Macrolepiota procera) (2) -- George Chernilevsky 00:29, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:05, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parasol mushroom (Macrolepiota procera) (3) -- George Chernilevsky 00:29, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination George Boyd House, Cape May. --King of Hearts 21:47, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sewell House, Cape May. --King of Hearts 21:47, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination John Forsythe House, Cape May. --King of Hearts 21:47, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gare de Paris-Saint-Lazare, West View, Paris 8e (by DXR) Sebring12Hrs 21:09, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Conciergerie and Cour de Cassation, Paris, 2 April 2014 (by DXR) Sebring12Hrs 20:49, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Armillaria mellea, Honey Fungus, taken in Enfield, UK --Stu's Images 19:59, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 106 Rue Brancion, Paris 15e (by DXR) Sebring12Hrs 20:07, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Metal structure on summit of Pizzo La Scheggia mountain, Italy. --Mænsard vokser 17:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 18:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote (1921) of Quedlinburg. --Palauenc05 17:08, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 19:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tropical Carpenter Bee (Xylocopa latipes) --Charlesjsharp 10:27, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:33, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Water tower in Baku in 2019 --MB-one 09:41, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Yellow sign crowded with insects at Landschaftsschutzgebiet Haithabu-Dannewerk --MB-one 09:41, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:41, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Audi RS5 Sportback at Classic Days Berlin 2019, Kurfürstendamm, Berlin-Charlottenburg --MB-one 09:41, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture in Saint-Corentin cathedral in Quimper (Finistère, France). --Gzen92 09:40, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stained glass window in Saint-Corentin cathedral in Quimper (Finistère, France). --Gzen92 09:40, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Erzi towers, panoramic view, Erzi, Ingushetia --Argenberg 09:05, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:27, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The artwork Děti chrání přírodu (Children Protect Nature) by Sylva Jílková-Lacinová --MIGORMCZ 08:18, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Photo ride with railcar M240.113 on the line Vranovice – Pohořelice --MIGORMCZ 08:05, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Photo ride with railcar M240.113 on the line Vranovice – Pohořelice - station Pohořelice --MIGORMCZ 08:05, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:27, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palace of Schönbrunn, Vienna, Austria --Poco a poco 07:55, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:32, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palace of Schönbrunn, Vienna, Austria --Poco a poco 07:55, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:12, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palace of Schönbrunn, Vienna, Austria --Poco a poco 07:55, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:13, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palace of Schönbrunn, Vienna, Austria --Poco a poco 07:55, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 16:12, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 3 Market Square in Świdnica --Jacek Halicki 07:25, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:37, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Graffiti "STÉPHANOIS". --Touam 06:59, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:27, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aulne Abbey during golden hour --Trougnouf 06:04, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:39, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Facade of the Aulne Abbey transept during golden hour --Trougnouf 06:04, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:23, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination High altar of Basilique Saint-Materne de Walcourt --Trougnouf 06:04, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:23, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Budding flower bud of a Dahlia 'Moonfire' Focus stack of 19 photos.
--Famberhorst 06:01, 14 October 2020 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:33, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Budding flower bud of a Dahlia 'Moonfire' Focus stack of 19 photos.
-
- Nomination Budding flower bud of an Anemone 'Eugenie'. Focus stack of 12 photos.
--Famberhorst 06:01, 14 October 2020 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:33, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Budding flower bud of an Anemone 'Eugenie'. Focus stack of 12 photos.
-
- Nomination Cruise ship Anna Katharina on the MD channel in Bamberg. Direction Danube. --Ermell 05:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:02, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cruise ship Anna Katharina on the MD channel in Bamberg. Direction Danube. --Ermell 05:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:33, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cruise ship Anna Katharina on the MD Canal in front of the lock in Bamberg. Direction Danube. --Ermell 05:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:45, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dance lime tree in the castle park of Neudrossenfeld --Ermell 05:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:33, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pilgrimage church Maria zu den Ketten, Zell am Harmersbach, Germany --Llez 05:39, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:03, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Common nyctemera (Nyctemera lacticinia) --Charlesjsharp 21:08, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, and I love the antennae! -- Ikan Kekek 08:50, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Long-flange millipede (Asiomorpha coarctata) --Charlesjsharp 21:08, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality (considering the small size of this creature). --Aristeas 09:41, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Transverse ladybird (Coccinella transversalis) --Charlesjsharp 21:08, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:35, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, only 1,234,427 pixels. Per se ineligible. -- Ikan Kekek 08:49, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Charlesjsharp 10:31, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bell tower, Cathedral of the Ascension, St. Nicholas Church and Cathedral Of Our Saviour in Voznesenskaya Davidova Pustyn. Russia. --Bff 20:06, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. The white walls are a little bit overexposed, but that’s hard to avoid here, and overall nice and pretty. --Aristeas 09:35, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jürgen Wagner --St. Krug 19:52, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Quality is OK (minor traces of CAs, probably not irritating). I assume that Mr Wagner is a “Person des Zeitgeschehens” or so and that therefore it is OK to take and publish photos of him. --Aristeas 09:39, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stop La Girardière towards Terrasse for the en:Société de transports de l'agglomération stéphanoise in [:en:Saint-Étienne], France. --Touam 19:30, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:39, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Templar devotional items. --Gordito1869 12:32, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
I withdraw my nomination --~~~~
-
- Nomination Weaving mill in Dzierżoniów --Jacek Halicki 08:01, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose It's hard to dicover that mill which the image is about. --Augustgeyler 09:27, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Acqua alta in Venice, Campo Santa Margherita.--Lion-hearted85 23:34, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Too bad the tree is cropped, but the subject is clearly below. --Trougnouf 10:51, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Comment Thank you for your review. I regret of the tree cropping, too. I wasn't aware at that time of the possibility of merging multiple shots vertically, which would have been helpful. --Lion-hearted85 12:52, 15 October 2020
-
- Nomination Chapel in Opoczka --Jacek Halicki 07:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 10:51, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Customshouse, Angra do Heroísmo, Terceira Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 07:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 10:51, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Sunny day in the pavilion at the Granite pier. Elagin island. 4N, northeast of Elagin Palace, Petrogradsky district, Saint Petersburg --Александр Байдуков 02:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Khaju bridge By User:Ara9979 --Hanooz 16:25, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- Review
There is a lot of color noise in the sky, can you fix it? (or at worst crop it) You also need to fill the description field --Trougnouf 17:41, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. Unfortunately, I just have a basic understanding of Photoshop. I added an English description. Hanooz 18:45, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hasht Behesht palace By User:Ara9979 --Hanooz 16:25, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Dirtsc 20:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Área de Proteção Ambiental da Baleia Franca By User:Ctseelig --Rodrigo.Argenton 13:14, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- Review Good quality, but an english description would be helpful, also you could rotate the picture a bit.--Tesla 13:20, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Pro when the horizon is adjusted. --Tsui 22:03, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Архангельская церковь: у городского кладбища, Вятские Поляны, Кировская областьЭто фотография памятника культурного наследия России c номеромЯ, владелец авторских прав на это произведение, добровольно публикую его на условиях следующей лицензии:Это изображение было загружено в рамках соревнования Вики любит памятники — 2020. --Ele-chudinovsk 09:17, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- Review Nice composition and motiv, but you could reduce noise and give an english description--Tesla 13:11, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jumping spider. By User:Techuser --Rodrigo.Argenton 01:41, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose cropped legs --Charlesjsharp 10:37, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Saint's Anargyroi Chapel, Cape Greco. --Kallerna 14:11, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- Review
Perspective distortion. Walls are learning out. Curved horizon. --ArildV 18:19, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Perspective fixed. --Kallerna 19:52, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the new version. The building is better now but not the horizon (barrel disortion?) --ArildV 20:16, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Dunno how to fix that. Is it that bad? --Kallerna 06:40, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Folwark in Krzyżowa 3 --Jacek Halicki 07:49, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Roof is cropped in. No QI to me like this. Feel free to send to CR, if you disagree. --MB-one 09:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Florets of Thistle (Cirsium wallichii), Prashar Lake, Mandi Distt, Himachal. Elev. 2,600m (8,530'). See full plant here --Tagooty 06:28, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose lacks detail --MB-one 09:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Spherical panoramic under a bridge in Leimbach, Zürich --Domob 17:36, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- Review interesting location but basically all areas out of the shadows are over exposed --Virtual-Pano 21:05, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Comment Lighting was unfortunately quite difficult; this is already using HDR, but yes, some parts of the sky are still blown. I think that most of the picture is fine, though. But if you believe that does not make it QI, it is fine for me to reject it. --Domob 04:16, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 360° panoramic --Wilfredor 14:27, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- Review stitching error on left part of church roof and slightly over exposed --Virtual-Pano 21:27, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 360° panoramic --Wilfredor 14:27, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- Review well balanced exposure minor stitching flaws round the base of the tripod --Virtual-Pano 21:38, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 360° panoramic --Wilfredor 14:27, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- Review well executed just two minor stitching mistakes at the middle handrail and the tile diamond in the pavement --Virtual-Pano 21:38, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Unterleinleiter_Leinleiter-20200726-RM-173933.jpg
[edit]- Nomination The river Leinleiter in Unterleinleiter --Ermell 06:00, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:05, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Weak opposeTechnically well done, this image should be cropped a little at the top. Otherwise these cutten leaves are disturbing the composition. --Augustgeyler 17:08, 11 October 2020 (UTC)~- Comment Good quality, but I agree with Augustgeyler. It would work better without those leaves on the top edge. --Jakubhal 05:19, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I agree, too. Either you should IMO include more of the leaves or crop them out. -- Ikan Kekek 06:07, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done Thanks for the reviews.--Ermell 21:26, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support well done! --Augustgeyler 09:41, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 23:10, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Jakubhal 04:51, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Aristeas 09:08, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 09:40, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Pskov._The_ensemble_of_the_Pskov_Kremlin.jpg
[edit]- Nomination The ensemble of the Pskov Kremlin from the Pskova river. Pskov Kremlin ensemble: Kremlin, at the confluence of the river.Pskov in the Velikaya river, Pskov, Pskov region --Александр Байдуков 06:08, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- I think the image lost some details on walls in bright points - especially seemd on the tower --Stimoroll 08:22, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I think it is tiltet a little cw --Augustgeyler 08:26, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- Question Why is the status of this "Discuss" instead of "Nomination", as it doesn't look like anyone voted on this? -- Ikan Kekek 09:23, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment changed to Nomination --Augustgeyler 11:32, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support Good quality and lighing --Tesla 10:33, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
OpposeLet's have a discussion now. I think it's worth discussing whether a lot of this photo isn't too noisy and whether a lot of it isn't too red with tinges of purple. Do the lamps really produce that color? -- Ikan Kekek 14:06, 11 October 2020 (UTC)Oppose Overexposed side of the tower - lost details. Tilted. --Jakubhal 05:08, 12 October 2020 (UTC)- Support Now, it is ok. ---- Jakubhal 04:06, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I've made a new version from the raw file kindly provided by the author. Consider re-reviewing. @Jakubhal, Ikan Kekek, and Stimoroll: --A.Savin 03:09, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Much better. I'm still not sure whether the level of noise is OK or not, so I've simply crossed out my opposing vote. -- Ikan Kekek 07:09, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support A bit soft now (unavoidable due to noise reduction), but overall OK and a very nice photo. --Aristeas 09:07, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 09:41, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Amalfi_Cathedral_-_Duomo_di_Amalfi_(4908).jpg
[edit]- Nomination: Interior of the Amalfi Cathedral. --Lion-hearted85 22:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Review
- Oppose IMHO too much noise for a QI because a high ISO setting --Berthold Werner 09:58, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:08, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Too noisy IMO per Berthold. -- Ikan Kekek 09:30, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful and atmospheric image, much noise but not too much for me -- Spurzem 11:33, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support +1 to Spurzem, atmospheric image, noise is still ok -- Tesla 13:30, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose QI with that amount of noise? Poco a poco 20:14, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support Noisy, but general good quality. Ok for me. Sebring12Hrs (talk)
- Oppose per Berthold.--Ermell 19:32, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- New version Thank you for your reviews. I agree with you that the image is rather noisy due to the high ISO used. I was quite in a rush there and not in a condition of doing a long exposure. To mitigate this problem, I have uploaded a new version with more selective sharpening and denoising – though I acknowledge that this is still quite a noisy image. --Lion-hearted85 14:00, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Much better, but still too noisy, I think. You should ping everyone who's voted. -- Ikan Kekek 17:21, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- An improvement, but still below the QI bar to me, sorry Poco a poco 17:43, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the improvment but IMHO still to noisy --Berthold Werner 07:29, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- It is still noisy, but over all, seeing this very well composed image, it's acceptable to me. --Augustgeyler 09:01, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Peulle 07:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Figura_św._Jana_Nepomucena,_ulica_Doktora_Józefa_Babińskiego,_Kraków,_20201004_1629_1577.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Statue of John of Nepomuk, Kobierzyn district of Kraków --Jakubhal 18:05, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Difficult light conditions and the bottom part feels a bit too dark --TommyG 18:44, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- weak oppose the clutterd background is distracting and the features of the statues in the lower part a hard to spot--Virtual-Pano 19:12, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support I disagree. --Ermell 19:18, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support So do I. The composition seems good based on the real-life conditions.--Peulle 10:10, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose With TommyG and Virtual-Pano. --Augustgeyler 13:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 11:00, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Light. --Kallerna 20:02, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support Difficult circumstances for a photograph, and this is certainly well-done considering, IMO, and good enough to be a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 05:50, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support Good quality --Scotch Mist 11:11, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Difficult light conditions, motiv is not seperated enough from background -- Tesla 15:25, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support Lower part is indeed in the dark but has good contrast. At least on my two calibrated monitors.--Tobias ToMar Maier 21:41, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support Considering difficult light conditions, and the fact that it looks uniquely interesting, I give this a thumbs up per others. --Vincent60030 10:18, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose The difficult lighting and cluttered background could have been minimized by fill-in lighting (or coming back at a different time) and moving to the right or left. --GRDN711 20:20, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- Not possible @GRDN711: , sorry. Right and left there is fence and more bush. This is the best frame you can got. --Jakubhal 04:49, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Fair comment @Jakubhal: but that still leaves the lighting. I think you did a good job making this image with the conditions present at that moment. I just don't accept that this image merits a QI rating with those conditions as part of it. --GRDN711 (talk) 03:20, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Total: 7 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 07:17, 16 October 2020 (UTC)