Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 15 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:20240122_blue_jay_casa_PD200729.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Blue Jay, Close Up, Glastonbury CT USA --Pdanese 01:43, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:07, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree Basically a very nice shot. But I think the photo is overprocessed, in particular there are heavily oversharpened areas right next to parts of the image that have been blurred by denoising. Less would be more. --Smial 12:23, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose yes, overprocessed. Charlesjsharp 09:03, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support a lot of digital processing (less would be even better). But the result is still significantly above our minimum standards. --MB-one 15:36, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Smial --Julesvernex2 18:27, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Per MB-one. --Аныл Озташ 17:15, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. Uploading the original image and then replacing it by a slightly sharpened / denoised version might be better. This image looks mostly great, except for some very unnaturally looking areas with the bright blue feathers near the bottom of the photo and on top of the head. There are completely blurry parts without any detail with adjacent extremely sharp parts, even within a single feather. Sorry, but this photo was considerably overprocessed. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 15:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Mike Peel (talk) 21:14, 14 February 2024 (UTC)