Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:MC Drei-Finger-Faultier.jpg

Image:MC Drei-Finger-Faultier.jpg

Original, featured

•  Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Chmehl -- Chmehl (talk) 15:45, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Support A Three-toed-sloth in the rather dark jungle of Costa Rica. -- Chmehl (talk) 15:45, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Support I feel lighting could have helped you a little bit more (background is a bit bright compared to main subject), but it still looks good. -- Benh (talk) 21:25, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Econt (talk) 19:23, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Nice sharpness on the hand. Cirt (talk) 19:36, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Ack Benh - Keta (talk) 10:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj (talk) 14:41, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Support--libertad0 ॐ (talk) 20:02, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose, out of focus. Канопус Киля (talk) 09:56, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Lycaon (talk) 10:19, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose dont like the background --Simonizer (talk) 18:15, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer (talk) 08:56, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

edited version, not featured

•  Info I have now ligthed the image a little. Leo Johannes (talk) 13:45, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Question are you withdrawing the original version or what? -- carol (talk) 22:21, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

I think the edited version has a bit better details in the shadows but less contrast, so I am not withdrawing the original version. I still prefer the original. Thanks for your effort Leo. -- Chmehl (talk) 05:56, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

No problem :-). I am not used to Commons, I didn't really know how to present the edited version (what I should do). Leo Johannes (talk) 08:40, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

result: 0 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. (Rule of the 5th day) Simonizer (talk) 13:37, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

edit 2, not featured

•  Info by Lycaon (talk) 10:19, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Lycaon (talk) 10:19, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Support I think this edit is superior to my original. Let's see if it gets more support votes than the original. Thanks for the editing by the way! Chmehl (talk) 20:43, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Agree with Chmehl --S23678 (talk) 00:11, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose same as above --Simonizer (talk) 08:50, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Support It is better. Barabas (talk) 00:37, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment I took the liberty to move this candidate to the top to get more opinions on the edit. Crapload (talk) 16:25, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Support prefer this edit -- Klaus with K (talk) 19:08, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Aqwis (talk) 11:22, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Surprisingly better ! some strange artifacts on dark areas, but minor issues -- Benh (talk) 19:20, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. (other version has more support votes) Simonizer (talk) 09:17, 11 August 2008 (UTC)