Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sasheer Zamata (81960)b.jpg

File:Sasheer Zamata (81960)b.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2022 at 02:45:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Sasheer Zamata (81960)b.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sasheer Zamata (81960)b.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People#Events
•  Info Sasheer Zamata is an American comedian who was on Saturday Night Live and does work in support of women's rights for the ACLU. Here she's performing a stand-up routine at the Tribeca Film Festival, during an event about the Time's Up movement. I've been debating whether to nominate this for a while, because it clearly isn't the best technical portrait we have, but it covers several subjects we don't have many FPs of and I think the quality is good enough for the context. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk |  02:45, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support — Rhododendrites ^talk |  02:45, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Very good portrait. I think it deserves the star. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:10, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 07:27, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Good facial expression and posture. I know nothing about her, but I am immediately impressed and interested (much more than by most photos of so-called celebrities); this means it’s a good portrait. --Aristeas (talk) 07:37, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support I like this, even if the background is a bit dark. And I would like to see this Picture featured, because it would be one of the few portraits of women in that gallery that are neither historical nor sexualized or exoticized. --Kritzolina (talk) 09:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

 CommentI now realize that this is not going under portrait, but under people at work ... where there are more interesting images. I am a bit confused why some of them are there and not under portrait, perhaps exactly for that reason? --Kritzolina (talk) 11:44, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

I think the distinction is a little unclear. Based on the current taxonomy, I tend to think of portraits as depicting people sitting/standing/posing for the portrait (intent/context) while "people at work" is for people actively engaged in their work. Maybe it would make sense to have something like a "performing arts" section, of which "musicians and singers performing" would become a subsection. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  18:30, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Yes, that sounds like a good idea! El Grafo (talk) 08:10, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Expressive and definitely FP-worthy. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:00, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support but I think too much noise reduction and loss of fine details Ezarateesteban 21:58, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Ermell (talk) 22:46, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:45, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:13, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- IamMM (talk) 09:55, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Lupe (talk) 16:14, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:17, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Nice to see her doing something post-SNL ... I felt sorry for her there because she never really found her niche (and it didn't help that she got so easily overshadowed by Leslie Jones). Daniel Case (talk) 19:45, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --A.Savin 11:24, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:40, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 10:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:15, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People_at_work