Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Riehen - Neuer Wenkenhof - Eingangsportal.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Riehen - Neuer Wenkenhof - Eingangsportal.jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2015 at 07:31:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

"Neuer Wenkenhof" in Riehen, Switzerland
Of a symmetric door. Is there any information missing or a strong aesthetic disturbance? --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:55, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose The fifty shades of shadows ... Yes, the shadows are very disturbing for the aesthetic for me, because it is simply to fix it: take the image a little earlier or later with less visible shadows. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:46, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The shadow is disturbing because it is simply to fix? Where is the logic of this argument? --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:52, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wenn Du mein "schlechtes" Englisch nicht verstehst, dann eben auf Deutsch: etwas früher oder später am Tage photographiert (hängt von der geographischen Lage des Standpunktes ab) würde den Schatteneffekt minimieren und das Bild von den störenden Schatten befreien. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:04, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Du gabst diese Möglichkeit als Grund dafür an, dass es dich ästhetisch stören würde. Und das wirkt als Begründung nicht sehr schlüssig. Leider gab es keine Begründung, warum es dich dieser minimale Schatten stört. --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:45, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Where we have light we naturally have shadow. Each shadow part is visible good, non of the parts in shadow is relevant for the image. The parts of shadow is less about 5%. So what's exactly is the problem? --Wladyslaw (talk) 10:10, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Measuring distracting elements in % probably doesn't help. I feel this image lives from its symmetry and the shadows clearly do not help to strengthen that impression. This is a matter of taste, but saying "none of the parts in shadow are relevant for the image" is not a good argument for FPC, imo. We see no sky at all, so perhaps a cloudy day would have solved such issue? --DXR (talk) 10:58, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed the symmetry-argument is the first documented reason here. But for sure I evaluate this situation different. Shadows give objects plasticity so this is not an issue of this picture IMO. --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:15, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe you proof your monitor to calibrate it. --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:46, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 7 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /-- Christian Ferrer 15:45, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Riehen_-_Neuer_Wenkenhof_-_Eingangsportal.jpg&oldid=155197496"