Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Porto Covo August 2010-14a.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Porto Covo August 2010-14a.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2010 at 18:06:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Where is the lifeguard and why are the people staring at left? The Praia Grande ('Large Beach') in Port Covo, in a summer day. Everything by Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:06, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:06, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Comment I see artifacts near the falling rocks sign. Multichill (talk) 21:00, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, I can't see anything. Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:11, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
- SupportThere are something that looks like a red noise at the cave's entrance and in a few other places, but still FP for me.--Mbz1 (talk) 00:41, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:20, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Oppose Some oddity causes pixellation whereever a person has a combination of light and dark skin tones or shadows. I'll mark a few people that suffer, but it's nearly everywhere. Perhaps the results of a curve or levels adjustment? --99of9 (talk) 11:26, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
- Info -- I see some noise and posterization in darker parts, not pixelation. Anyway, it should be stressed that those minor effects are hardly perceived, even in full size, and that the picture was not downsampled, only cropped where necessary. The origin of these flaws is (I think) some underexposure of the individual pictures, which Hugin automatically compensated. Yes, it would look cleaner in smaller size but I want to preserve the full information. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:09, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Ok, posterization is a better term. I appreciate that you've uploaded the full size, and am not advocating downsampling. I am just saying that there must be a better processing method that prevents these artifacts. Can you upload the originals so that if someone else wants to have another go at blending they can?
P.S. Why don't the image notes show up on the FPC page, only on the single nomination page?--99of9 (talk) 00:31, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose per 99of9 --Avala (talk) 12:41, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support - I sort of see what Toby is referring to, but it's not a huge issue in my opinion. I think overall this is a well-executed and high-quality panorama that I could frankly spend hours looking at – lots of detail. –Juliancolton | Talk 13:56, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
- Strong Support per Alves' Info and Julian. The quality is very high and nearly more important at this one: the scene is very interesting and just great imo! bg mathias K 14:38, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support FP for me --Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez (talk) 20:13, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support Cathy Richards (talk) 12:53, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose It's hard to avoid ghosts when stitching images with people on them. Unfortunately you missed at least one which I marked on the image. Regards -- Any1s (talk) 16:04, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- Info -- I have uploaded a new and lighter version where most of the pixelation/posterization problems were mitigated, by manual cloning from the original pictures. No attempt was made to eliminate the detected ghost, as I don't consider the flaw serious. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:57, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - ditto to 99of9 and Any1s; also find it a decidedly ordinary beach scene, nothing very special about it - MPF (talk) 20:03, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Ggia (talk) 23:15, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- Comment To be honest I can't see much improvement in the new version. I've marked a masking problem down at the bottom of the waves. Personally I'm much more worried about the posterization than about the ghosting. The posterization just seems like it must be fixable. --99of9 (talk) 10:39, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
- Could you add a description above please? Yann (talk) 14:17, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Question -- I don't understand. What kind of desciption? Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:08, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
- I think he means the one here: <div class="wpImageAnnotatorFile">[[File:Porto Covo August 2010-14a.jpg|x300px|'''''SHORT DESCRIPTION''''']]</div> –Juliancolton | Talk 18:09, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, thanks. Yann (talk) 07:52, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
- I think he means the one here: <div class="wpImageAnnotatorFile">[[File:Porto Covo August 2010-14a.jpg|x300px|'''''SHORT DESCRIPTION''''']]</div> –Juliancolton | Talk 18:09, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:55, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
