Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iceland - 2017-02-22 - Gullfoss - 3684.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2017 at 23:38:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created & uploaded by User:PierreSelim - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:38, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Support - How about a winter waterfall? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:38, 19 March 2017 (UTC)- Support And here I thought PierreSelim was just a simple oversighter...
lNeverCry 23:53, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- From time to time I visit nice places (and I try to have my camera in my backpack) :) --PierreSelim (talk) 18:28, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support - One of my bucket list destinations... and judging by what's going on at the parking lot in the background, it doesn't appear that I'm alone in that respect. –Juliancolton | Talk 23:56, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support -However, I would brighten it about half to one stop. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 03:05, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Comment I find it too dark. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:42, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Question - Wouldn't you expect winter in Iceland to be dark? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:10, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Everything is relative; you wouldn't expose a bright and sunny day using the same settings as you would for a cloudy day. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:34, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- True, but the result should still be darker than a bright, sunny day, to be true to how it actually looked and felt. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, but here it really is exposed as if it were a bright, sunny day: 1/640s at f/8 at ISO 200. I usually shoot at f/8, 1/250s, ISO 100 on a sunny day, so this is in fact 1/3 stop less than a typical sunny exposure, which combined with the lower amount of light produces an image that is too dark for my tastes. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:07, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- I understand. Thanks for explaining. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:34, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, but here it really is exposed as if it were a bright, sunny day: 1/640s at f/8 at ISO 200. I usually shoot at f/8, 1/250s, ISO 100 on a sunny day, so this is in fact 1/3 stop less than a typical sunny exposure, which combined with the lower amount of light produces an image that is too dark for my tastes. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:07, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- True, but the result should still be darker than a bright, sunny day, to be true to how it actually looked and felt. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Everything is relative; you wouldn't expose a bright and sunny day using the same settings as you would for a cloudy day. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:34, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support great mood --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:48, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support --cart-Talk 10:07, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support Great find Ikan! (if a little unsharp/too much NR) -- Thennicke (talk) 12:14, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - Thanks. I saw it at QIC recently. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:49, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Ivar (talk) 12:29, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 15:20, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:10, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 21:27, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:22, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:35, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support Thanks for this clear FP. Excellent composition, contrast and moment --The Photographer 16:35, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support--g. balaxaZe★ 20:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Alaa :)..! 22:37, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural
