Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive 6

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:58, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Denniss (talk) 11:12, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image of no realistic educational application; out of scope Rrburke (talk) 18:02, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Denniss (talk) 11:28, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE due to too low image quality (technical) to be usable. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:22, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE due to extremely low technical quality, making the image unusable. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:33, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Attack image possibly (based on description). Otherwise out of scope. Bawolff (talk) 21:52, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:09, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No inidication who subject is. Probably not useful for an educational purpose Bawolff (talk) 21:53, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks out of scope. Not used, and subject not identified in description (looks like a keyboard smash) Bawolff (talk) 21:58, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The fact the image is watermarked with a url suggests it is not really the uploader's own work Bawolff (talk) 22:05, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks like a commercial promotion image. seems unlikely to be own work Bawolff (talk) 22:07, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

quality too bad, we have better kittens Isderion (talk) 22:14, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: As per nom russavia (talk) 11:25, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nod logo from command & conquer; probably copyrighted Isderion (talk) 22:16, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image; out of scope Isderion (talk) 22:21, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image; out of scope Isderion (talk) 22:23, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Totosandino11 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - promo images

INeverCry 23:35, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope PierreSelim (talk) 05:57, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Personal photograph with no apparent usage here. Additionally, chosen filename indicates this may be some sort of attack page. (ESkog)(Talk) 03:09, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Creativecommons.org is CC-BY, so screenshots may be released with attribution. However this photograph appears to be a camera photograph of a physical screen rather than taking a software screenshot, the resultant quality is unlikely to be realistically useful. (talk) 07:00, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo has sufficient creativity to be copyrightable and would require a release from the FCA to be retained. I note it appears at higher resolution in many places on the internet. (talk) 07:03, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence uploader has any authority to license. Photo apparently available on web; another image from same uploader carries a professional credit. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:20, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Copyright violation. Martin H. (talk) 23:21, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence uploader has any authority to license. Photo apparently available on web; another image from same uploader carries a professional credit. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:21, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Copyright violation. Martin H. (talk) 23:21, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence uploader has any authority to license. Photo apparently available on web; another image from same uploader carries a professional credit. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:21, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Copyright violation. Martin H. (talk) 23:21, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence uploader has any authority to license. Photo apparently available on web; another image from same uploader carries a professional credit. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:22, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Obvious copyvio russavia (talk) 10:55, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence uploader has any authority to license. Photo apparently available on web; another image from same uploader carries a professional credit. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:23, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Copyright violation. Martin H. (talk) 23:22, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence uploader has any authority to license. Photo apparently available on web; photo carries a professional credit. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:24, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: (C) Andrew Evans / PR Photos. Agency photo grabbed from the web. Also the other uploads by Carter 511 (talk · contribs). --Martin H. (talk) 23:20, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:20, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:30, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:32, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:35, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:36, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused blurry personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:38, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:38, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete It also contains copyrighted character designs (Hatsune Miku, MLP ponies)--Brainy J (talk) 23:24, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 11:51, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:39, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom High Contrast (talk) 16:37, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:40, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope High Contrast (talk) 16:37, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:41, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: According to google imagesearch it is a copy of e.g. [1] and therefore deleted as a possible copyvio. Martin H. (talk) 23:42, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:45, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope High Contrast (talk) 16:37, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:47, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Blurry, unused personal picture -> not in scope PierreSelim (talk) 06:36, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:53, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of scope High Contrast (talk) 16:37, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:53, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of scope High Contrast (talk) 16:37, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:54, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of scope High Contrast (talk) 16:37, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:55, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of scope High Contrast (talk) 16:38, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:47, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of scope High Contrast (talk) 16:38, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:48, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of scope High Contrast (talk) 16:38, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:50, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of scope High Contrast (talk) 16:38, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 15:04, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of scope High Contrast (talk) 16:38, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE: personal image —Mono 21:13, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of scope High Contrast (talk) 16:38, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted Sony software. —Mono 21:16, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Blatant copyright violation. No need to remain this discussion open. High Contrast (talk) 20:12, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that the person in this photo consented to the publication of this photo which is clearly taken in a private place. It has been placed into Category:Selfies, but there is no evidence that the person in the photo took the photo themselves. File:Ya like I said, drunk in north Dakota- 2013-06-21 23-06.jpg would indicate that it was not taken by themselves. russavia (talk) 22:10, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have this in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 19:56, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have this flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 19:57, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have this in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 19:57, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks pretty much like out of scope. JuTa 16:10, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 01:09, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Isderion (talk) 23:44, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: As per nom russavia (talk) 01:19, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal picture; out of project scope Isderion (talk) 00:16, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:31, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have significant doubt that this is freely licensed by the copyright holder. Detailed examination of the image's lower edge contains shadows that also occur in http://spoki.tvnet.lv/slavenibas/Reperi-kuri-tika-nogalinati/236210 . The tvnet.lv image issimilar to a scan of what appears to be a 2004 album cover, see http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/images/B00AJRQ7P6/ref=dp_image_text_z_0/176-7699587-6515110?ie=UTF8&n=163856011&s=dmusic zoomed in from http://www.amazon.com/Stack-Master-Explicit/dp/B00AJRQ7P6. 84user (talk) 15:31, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll expand on my reasons for nominating this. I found this image from Commons:Mobile_app/deletion_request_tracking, which was linked from Commons_talk:Project_scope/Update_2013/Must_be_freely_licensed_or_public_domain/Precautionary_principle. I was reading that discussion to try to form a view of how to specify "significant doubt". Now, for this image I cannot be certain that the uploader might indeed be the original copyright holder that decided to crop the original work and submit it at Commons - in fact the size of the cropped version is 520 by 538 which is larger than all examples found, excepting the amazon zoomed in version. When I push the gamma correction very low I can see both the blocky jpeg artefacts (expected) and what look like blocked out rectangular areas in the white background. However the jpeg artefacts are different between the amazon zoom and the uploaded version, and I am guessing that each image is derived from a yet larger (and better quality) version. The uploaded version also appears to have been upscaled (it's clearly blurry), casting further doubt. Finally, I've only just now noticed the image probably came from http://truespeech.wordpress.com/2012/03/14/happy-birthday-blade-icewood-r-i-p/ - the uploaded version includes the text "truespeech.wordpress.com" and the exact same size of the blog image (386 x400). So, I have doubts but are they significant enough? -84user (talk) 16:14, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: obvious copyvio of [2]. The screenshot even says which site it's browsing, and the next image in the gallery is also the same as the next on the blog. 99of9 (talk) 09:13, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Victor Oladipo Presented Jersey By General Manager Rob Hennigan 2013-07-07 03-11.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not believe the uploader is the copyright holder of this image. The uploader's username is the same as the football player in the photograph, so how did he manage to take this photograph? Did the uploader commission the photographer to take this image? If so evidence would be needed. Note that JPEGSnoop identifies the image as having been processed by Apple ImageIO.framework with quality setting 80. 84user (talk) 17:49, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:45, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same pic is found here: http://www.nba.com/warriors/fanzone/dotcom_blog_011812.html Zagalejo (talk) 17:55, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:45, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Almost 100% certain this is a copyright violation. These images have been on the internet for years. One example , http://www.taringa.net/posts/imagenes/8317198/Popurri.html. 84user (talk) 18:54, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Clear copyvio, grabbed from the internet. Martin H. (talk) 23:50, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly likely to be copyrighted, see the watermark. 84user (talk) 19:25, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Blatant copyvio, see watermark. Martin H. (talk) 22:47, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that uploader has thecopyright. Also appears to require consent by the persons depicted. 84user (talk) 19:30, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:50, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt the uploader has permission for this photograph of Brazilian football referee Nadine Schramm. If the uploader is the same person, then permission from the photographer is needed. 84user (talk) 20:04, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:50, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly likely copyright violation. See higher resolution example from 2003 at http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=pv&GRid=2255&PIpi=522637. 84user (talk) 20:13, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:50, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I now suspect this is a copyright violation cropped from http://www.hdwallpaperstop.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Beautiful-Track-Yellow-Moon-Wallpaper.jpg from http://www.hdwallpaperstop.com/full-moon-wallpapers/ . The larger photograph shows a name at bottom right. In any case we need more evidence that the uploader has permission. 84user (talk) 21:43, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Delete. No evidence of permission. The name at bottom left is Aaron J. Groen. His website is there. A large version is also visible on another site. -- Asclepias (talk) 22:53, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio russavia (talk) 01:17, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyright violation; publicity photo from "Legend of the Seeker" TV series; uploader's claim that this is his own work is not credible — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 22:00, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Copyright violation. Martin H. (talk) 23:24, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyright violation from http://paulboylan.wordpress.com/category/i-am-shiva-the-destroyer-of-worlds/ 84user (talk) 22:32, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:55, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, just search google for examples 84user (talk) 22:36, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:55, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, use google images, see [3], [4]. Que lleva cinco o seis años sin enamorarse es la confesión menos impactante que hizo Eduardo Yáñez durante una plática con la periodista Tanya Charry, frente a las cámaras del programa El gordo y la flaca (Univisión). 84user (talk) 22:42, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:55, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, use google images 84user (talk) 22:44, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:55, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyvio from http://withi.wordpress.com/2013/03/29/czas-zamiata-ulice-zmieniajac-je-nie-do-poznania/ which itself probably is copied from elsewhere 84user (talk) 22:50, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:55, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:28, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:09, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Project scope, bad quality Polarlys (talk) 10:51, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Project scope, bad quality Polarlys (talk) 10:52, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works Polarlys (talk) 10:52, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE due to rather low (technical) image quality. (Personal disclaimer: I like cats and think we still don't have enough good cat images.) -- Túrelio (talk) 13:01, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:20, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

two from three of this user's "own work" uploads were obvious copyvios. I can't be sure if this one is, but I think we should probably delete per COM:PRP 99of9 (talk) 09:27, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:29, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Many google/tineye hits for original image. 99of9 (talk) 09:31, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:29, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Many on the web already at this resolution. Some kind of album cover? Likely copyvio. 99of9 (talk) 09:36, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:29, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope 99of9 (talk) 09:38, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:29, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too small to be useful. If this is free licensed (not own work), we can get a bigger version. 99of9 (talk) 09:48, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Copyrighted icon. --Wylve (talk) 19:07, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:30, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright claim seems dubious. The writing at the bottom of the picture suggests a commercial use of the image, perhaps as a poster. Also, the date written on the picture contradicts the uploader's claimed date. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:25, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:31, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image (taken by me) was uploaded accidentally and depicts the wrong subject. Please delete. Another Believer (talk) 15:07, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Duplicate of File:WDC, Coal Harbour, Vancouver (2013).jpg. -- Rillke(q?) 10:20, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image of no realistic educational application: out of project scope. Rrburke (talk) 00:14, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:09, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Moros y Cristianos 05:53, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:20, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 09:54, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:26, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 16:20, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:34, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 16:26, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:38, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Several images appear in this collage. The source and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient. High Contrast (talk) 16:28, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:38, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no encyclopedic value - likely a copyright violation, too (see the notice on the bottom of the image) High Contrast (talk) 16:31, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:38, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: no encyclopedic value High Contrast (talk) 16:31, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:38, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative of copyrighted material Werieth (talk) 20:52, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:42, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense: not relevant file name / file description Jackie (talk) 06:08, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rename it, don"t delete.--Scorpion-811 (talk) 06:39, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: use {{Rename}} instead. INeverCry (talk) 01:35, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair use image tagged with incorrect license. Dismas (talk) 23:54, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 02:09, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains large copyrighted image, and as such it is not public domain. Beerest355 (talk) 20:40, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How can this photo be copyrighted if it was taken in a location? You think just because Family Guy characters is on the photo, you have the rights to tell me that it's a large copyright? --拱連鑄機 12:28, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Simply taking a photo of the poster justifies the fact that you don't own the rights to it. It's a pretty clear copyright violation. Beerest355 (talk) 14:31, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I do own the rights to the photo, because I took the picture. Also, I don't see in the copyright rules that taking a photo in a public place is a copyright violation. --拱連鑄機 14:38, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
See COM:DW. If the poster were there only incidentally, it might be kept because of COM:DM, but clearly you took this photo specifically to include the poster. We can't have it here. darkweasel94 16:42, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It does not mention about if anything is captured in a photo, it's a copyright violation, also it is COM:DM. It was token in a public place, so how does that make my photo that I took could be a copyright violation?--拱連鑄機 17:56, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The "public place" argument is called COM:FOP. In the US it would apply to buildings but not to 2D artworks, and in almost no country would it apply to artworks that are in public places only temporarily. Sorry, we didn't invent those laws. darkweasel94 18:33, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Check out the United States part, it says nothing about having it in 3D only, it says if a poster is on a building, it is ok to upload it. --拱連鑄機 20:04, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Where does it say that? darkweasel94 20:15, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[1] --拱連鑄機 21:28, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've read that. That doesn't say anywhere that if a poster is on a building you can take a photo of the poster. Or if it does, please quote the entire sentence. darkweasel94 22:55, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It only says artwork and sculptures are not allowed, not posters that are taken in public places. --拱連鑄機 23:03, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Posters are artwork, unless they are so simple that they cannot be copyrighted (e.g. consist only of a few words and no graphics). darkweasel94 23:21, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The photo is simple, it has a few words and it doesn't have that much graphics. --拱連鑄機 23:57, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The Family Guy characters on the poster are enough graphics. There is no use discussing it with me, btw; I'm not an admin and nobody here invented copyright law. darkweasel94 00:10, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: derivatives of non-free works are prohibited on Commons FASTILY 20:57, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted TouchWiz software —Mono 00:17, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 02:28, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:45, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 02:35, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:46, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 02:35, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:56, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 02:35, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, see http://www.foxsports.com.br/blogs/view/110181-escalador-de-12-anos-sofre-acidente-fatal-na-franca WWGB (talk) 06:26, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 02:36, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, see http://thebiglead.fantasysportsven.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/roy-nelson.jpg WWGB (talk) 06:33, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 02:37, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Subject or topic of this photo cannot be identified. Wylve (talk) 19:06, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 02:46, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The character and Octopus Card designs are copyrighted. Freedom of Panorama in Hong Kong does not apply to this image. The Copyright Ordinance regarding FoP specifically states that any drawings are not considered "works of artistic craftsmanship" and therefore not protected under FoP. Wylve (talk) 19:28, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 02:46, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:56, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 03:48, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown person, low picture quality, no valid EXIF-data, not used Motopark (talk) 05:23, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 04:15, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 04:47, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of copyrighted video game. Kyores (talk) 16:37, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 04:52, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Rillke(q?) 20:38, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 04:57, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Rillke(q?) 20:40, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 04:57, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:13, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:21, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Nonsense Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:56, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:23, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Not used, not described, not categorized. Moros y Cristianos 05:47, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: No use for any project possible. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:02, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:57, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 19:20, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: no educational value High Contrast (talk) 19:21, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Sorry, but Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 19:21, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Sorry, but Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 19:28, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:32, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Sorry, but Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 19:30, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:32, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 19:30, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Sorry, but Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 19:30, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work unlikely - several search results on the web [5] High Contrast (talk) 19:48, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:34, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: No educational value; Commons is no private image host for photographs of substandard quality High Contrast (talk) 19:51, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:34, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 19:52, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:34, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:53, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:38, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 11:43, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Sreejith K (talk) 12:15, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains derivative work, and it not de-minimis. Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 11:50, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Sreejith K (talk) 12:14, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope, bad filename, bad description Mjrmtg (talk) 12:04, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:43, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:09, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:43, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:19, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:44, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:21, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:44, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:33, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:45, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:35, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:49, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:36, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:49, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:37, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:49, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No scope. Fry1989 eh? 17:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:51, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zayn al aziz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

likely copyvios - own work claim doubtful

INeverCry (talk) 02:29, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination High Contrast (talk) 17:58, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

He dead in 1972 and there is no proof that the uploader is the original creator of the file. Rapsar (talk) 09:37, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 188.104.112.40 12:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 07:30, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Czech is Cyrillized (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Confusing copyright notice:

This work is in the public domain.
This compilation of the work is edited by <long list of people removed> and first published by Cambridge University Press 2009.
© Cambridge University Press 2009

It can't both be "© Cambridge University Press" and in the public domain at the same time. What does this mean? You can read the copyright notice by viewing the preview at http://books.google.com/books/about/Revised_6_Report_on_the_Algorithmic_Lang.html?id=woWVrzfsbuAC&redir_esc=y

Stefan4 (talk) 00:09, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All four of these documents are part of a set. On the first page of the first document, the Scheme Language Reference, this text appears:

We intend this report to belong to the entire Scheme community, and so we grant permission to copy it in whole or in
part without fee.

--Ululation (talk) 02:48, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a comment from the editor, Michael Sperber:

As the project editor, note that I've been following this discussion (as, I'm sure, have other editors), but have zero to add: As other people have reiterated, the permission notice in the document is pretty clear, AFAICS.

It is archived here: http://lists.r6rs.org/pipermail/r6rs-discuss/2013-July/006456.html

--Ululation (talk) 16:10, 21 July 2013 (UTC) I think it means that the original text itself is in the public domain, but the edition published by CUP is copyrighted. Czech is Cyrillized (talk) 14:49, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is that possible? After all, publishing isn't a creative act that would create a new copyright. darkweasel94 16:32, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming this file as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 08:48, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Due to the lack of meta data, one can only assume its a copyvio Flickrworker (talk) 10:00, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Tagged as copyvio. Martin H. (talk) 04:01, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 19:44, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mehmetdergalip (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:17, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - hazy - low quality INeverCry (talk) 18:11, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:33, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:51, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:03, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:04, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:17, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:29, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:29, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:41, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:42, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:43, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:45, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:47, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:53, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:57, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:00, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value, dont know what this is, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:14, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and delete this; I wasn't aware it had uploaded (I was playing with the Commons uploader app and didn't mean to upload it).--Jorm (WMF) (talk) 22:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]