Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive/2020-13

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal usage. Out of scope. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 10:05, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:37, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private profile icon. Out of scope. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 10:11, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:37, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like selfie, not uploader's own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:43, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:1989 for violating copyright. GFJ (talk) 13:51, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jaishriram123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:25, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deleted by -revi. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:07, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dramiralikhan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Random out of COM:SCOPE people.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:42, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:NOTHOST. --Green Giant (talk) 22:19, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture. Out of scope. SirEdimon (talk) 03:16, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:55, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Company logo used for advertisement. Out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 11:48, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:08, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indoor COM:FoP(全景自由)in Mainland of China. WQL (talk) 13:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose subjects are simple stick-man diagrams, which a Chinese high court has ruled ineligible for copyright in a similar case. Read COM:TOO China for more.--Roy17 (talk) 15:37, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If it is not Supreme High Court, then it will have no value for reference, since Chinese law is not case law.--WQL (talk) 16:25, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Commons community makes decisions by drawing comparison between real-life cases and Commons files. Whether or not a country practises common law is not relevant to the discussion on copyright of an actual work.
In this case, the figures are simple geometric shapes or doodles, or stick-man figures. They are similar to an example in COM:TOO China which decided a figure like 黑棍小人 (头部为黑色圆球体,没有面孔;身体的躯干、四肢和足部均由黑色线条构成;小人的头和身体呈分离状;小人的四肢呈拉长状) was ineligible for copyright.--Roy17 (talk) 16:38, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You can make such a comparison, but as I said before, due to the fact that Chinese law is not case law, the example given is not ruling by Supreme High Court, and the case is not listed in the Typical Case published by Supreme High Court, your comparison is meaningless. --WQL (talk) 03:28, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose per above. David290 (talk) 05:10, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per discussion, especially per Roy. Taivo (talk) 18:50, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 沈澄心 as Dw no source since (dw no source since)

The previous DR was closed as kept because the figures on the image are considered below the relatively low TOO of the People's Republic of China. I don't see any new arguments for deletion here.  Keep pandakekok9 05:22, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 04:01, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kuncungestareiu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:CSD#G10

Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:47, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:41, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:38, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:01, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kuncungestareiu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:CSD#G10

Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:47, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:41, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jessamine Buxton (1894 - 1966)... only dead 54 years so permission to publish/upload examples of work not allowed. Acabashi (talk) 09:53, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:19, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jessamine Buxton (1894 - 1966)... only dead 54 years so permission to publish/upload examples of work not allowed. Acabashi (talk) 09:56, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:19, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images from the book 'May Courtney O'Neill - Paintings Collection'. No indication that the book is out of copyright. Acabashi (talk) 10:01, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:21, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image can hardly be 'own work'. Source not given. No indication that the actual photographer has been dead 70 years, or the image published before 1923. Acabashi (talk) 10:06, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Halftone -- certainly not own work as claimed. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:43, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An older photo of this man shown here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlZSgBNpuHk The original photograph cannot be that dated per the description, the image probably taken from a previously published image with a camera on the date shown in the description. The uploader has not given adequate evidence that he/she has the right to republish a copy of the image, or that the original photographer has been dead 70 years... which would be impossible as the subject is still alive. Acabashi (talk) 10:25, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:44, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file cannot be determined DS28 (talk) 07:39, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Delete Image makes no sense. It's a screenshot of Google Maps but doesn't explain what it's all about. The categories aren't related to the actual image. JIP (talk) 11:10, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:04, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]