Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive/2019-2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

BLurry and no added values ThatBPengineer (talk) 07:44, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:37, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unneeded COM:NUDE picture funplussmart (talk) 22:02, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 22:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be a personal photo showing a non-notable (no offence meant) person, with useless categories: Trees, Google, Air India, Google Photos, India, Google+. This may also apply to other uploads by the same user:


The user was inactive for six years, and his only contribution back then was reverted and may be classified as vandalism. Renardo la vulpo (talk) 11:46, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me, he wants to contribute now. Better categories Category:Trees in the Lal Bagh Botanical Garden, Category:People at the Lal Bagh Botanical Garden ? --LudwigSebastianMicheler (talk) 15:34, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, @LudwigSebastianMicheler. Two out of the five pictures show nothing but the uploader, on the others he is the central object. Commons:SCOPE says “The uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of Commons or another project is allowed as long as that user is or was an active participant on that project” (my emphasis). This is not a speedy DL, so the uploader has a week to “become active.” Or if you consider these pictures “realistically useful for an educational purpose,” please vote {{Keep}} and override my DL, I have no problems with that. -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 20:08, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The uploader seems to use two identities, Mrinmoy.indian and Mrinmoy Mondal. Under the first identity he uploaded a picture in July 2018, which was deleted as out of scope. (So he was not completely inactive for six years, sorry.) -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 18:51, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:26, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not useful. Ubcule (talk) 14:33, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:35, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out-of-scope image of non-notable person, not currently in personal use. Ubcule (talk) 14:33, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:36, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC vists panoramica del pueblo de monasterio 78.30.4.101 17:04, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ezarateesteban 21:00, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sadly there's no Freedom Of Ponarama in Russia for the monuments. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 06:35, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:56, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gulzar Mughal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 10:16, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Gulzar Mughal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

{{SD|G10. Personal photos by non-contributors. Only contributions are to en.wiki, where account is blocked for spam.

GMGtalk 15:12, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:57, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abhay Hans (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, personal photos

Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:58, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 19:29, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is edited version of the photo given in the website with an application https://m.imdb.com/name/nm7759290/mediaviewer/rm816712448 Iamheentity (talk) 05:11, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination: COM:DW. Ruthven (msg) 18:18, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, unused image. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:44, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:22, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope and false naming and categorization! Ras67 (talk) 00:10, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:52, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need the mural's position to assess the freedom of panorama, else COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 00:19, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:49, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chef Singh Lokendra (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See previous discussions. This is getting tedious. Maybe consider blocking some sockpuppets?

LX (talk, contribs) 19:09, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And, since Chef Singh Lokendra keeps uploading problematic files instead of commenting here:
LX (talk, contribs) 12:02, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And again:
LX (talk, contribs) 21:27, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note - I've taken the view that this is simply an abuse of Commons over a number of years now. The links provided on the other DRs show a complete disregard for policies and practice here. As such I've indefinitely blocked this user (and will block any future accounts I see).--Herby talk thyme 15:29, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:44, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and are therefore unacceptable derivative works.

xplicit 02:18, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:50, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]