Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive/2017-49

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo, no educational purpose, out of scope ManniLo (talk) 08:44, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:52, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Umeyou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Large selection of images of varying sizes with no EXIF data trawled from the web. No evidence of ownership or permission.

DAJF (talk) 09:02, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - part of the files were reuploads of deleted content. --Jcb (talk) 22:26, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Umeyou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

As with the previous mass deletion request for the same user, this a large selection of images of varying sizes with no EXIF data trawled from the web. No evidence of ownership or permission.

DAJF (talk) 07:36, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Umeyou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These two (identical) photos are of a limited-issue postcard issued by the Aichi Museum of Flight, and so are copyright.

DAJF (talk) 07:46, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:05, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-notable logo, out of scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:14, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:06, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 15:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:58, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal screenshot Apocheir (talk) 18:55, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:20, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny image with no EXIF data uploaded by user with extensive history of uploading images from the web without permission. DAJF (talk) 23:58, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:39, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 06:09, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted by Dyolf77 at 17:24, 2 Dezember 2017 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Surendra Sidar 17.jpg: unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 19:33, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not for selfies Syced (talk) 08:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this person is famous, please include his full name, and a link to his Wikipedia article or a newspaper article about him, in any language. Thanks! Syced (talk) 08:49, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gerwin_Spalink_.jpg Syced (talk) 08:54, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jang_Keun_Suk_on_July_02_2016_2.jpg Syced (talk) 08:57, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

off topic, advertisement Syced (talk) 09:14, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted by Dyolf77 at 17:20, 2 Dezember 2017 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Islam.jpeg: off topic, advertisement --Krdbot 19:33, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

off topic, advertisement Syced (talk) 09:14, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted by Krd at 10:00, 4 Dezember 2017 UTC: Broken redirect --Krdbot 13:30, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfie. if famous please include link to Wikipedia or newspaper article Syced (talk) 09:18, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted by Dyolf77 at 17:22, 2 Dezember 2017 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Raj&roman roy.jpg: selfie. if famous please include link to Wikipedia or newspaper article --Krdbot 19:33, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry while not being extremely important Syced (talk) 09:26, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ReedukayRKB (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos and promo pieces from music studio with no WP article and only promotional hits on Google. Long spammy descriptions on each. Unused.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:03, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfie of the user Moajjem Hossain 00:23, 30 November 2017 (UTC)



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:39, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, unused files, imho seriously personality right issues, but also missing EXIF data to verify claimed 'own work', hence personality and copyright issues ?

Roland zh (talk) 20:09, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:34, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No one cares. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:17, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:28, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No one cares. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:17, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:29, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work. Also, smiley ruins the image. Syced (talk) 04:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:51, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Md mahmood (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of the project scope. Commons is not a place to share personal images.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:26, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Jon Kolbert. Ruthven (msg) 06:00, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Md mahmood (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal files, misuse of commons as a webhost.

Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 09:56, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Surendra Sidar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.hindustantimes.com/rf/image_size_640x362/HT/p2/2016/06/27/Pictures/_fc374ff4-3c36-11e6-86cd-639e2418d1d4.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:33, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Surendra Sidar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-x3AQswZCurM/Wf81ZnEwFTI/AAAAAAAAyqE/Ze7WNgjPVAUNSwyUSmDNNjbt6RqGsfY_ACHMYCw/s1600/India-currency-cash-notes-images-for-whatsapp-MyWhatsappImages.com-239.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:34, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Surendra Sidar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Multiple phones/cameras, varying sizes and quality. Tagging logos as CC. Clear flickr washing.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:05, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This decision is wrong. I do not think that the photos I uploaded violate Wikimedia's rules.And as far as the size and quality of photographs are different, it is natural that different types of photographs can be taken with different cameras, as a result of which photographs of different sizes and quality are created. Surendra Sidar|Talk 🌠 08:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See above, your upload history says otherwise. If they are really you own work, please send your permission to COM:VRT. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 18:47, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ManFromNord as no permission (No permission since) Derivative work of copyrighted items. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 16:33, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination and w: File:Trouble_in_Tokyo.jpg. Green Giant (talk) 13:19, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hermanbkk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:35, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:23, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:59, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:53, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ad / off-topic Syced (talk) 01:09, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:21, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope! Ras67 (talk) 03:01, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Mitte27 (talk) 17:19, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Support --Alaa :)..! 10:15, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:19, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Mitte27 (talk) 17:20, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:26, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

your opinions are asked : unused file, personality right issues and also missing EXIF data to verify claimed 'own work', Roland zh (talk) 17:58, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No exif happens sometimes with some bad (and older) cell phones. And this looks like a bad old cell phone photorgarphy.--Sanandros (talk) 22:04, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, I do not take position on copyright, but delete it as out of project scope: blurry photo about unidentified persons. Taivo (talk) 13:20, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

Extended content

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]
  •  Keep any images listed here uploaded by me. This bot mass deletion based on a category makes proper review unnecessarily complex, and is a way of bypassing the normal DR process. -- (talk) 05:28, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Betty Ages photo. It's worrying that crosswiki photos like this are being unthinkingly deleted out of process. Please stop creating these crazy large automatic DRs for potentially controversial in scope images. -- (talk) 05:37, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Files which are in use on other projects must not be deleted, please remove from this DR before considering any action. An example is the photograph of Arnab Roy Chowdhury. This DR is obviously hastily prepared using automation rather than actually looking at the images nominated. -- (talk) 10:07, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: You really want to create dozens of thousands single DRs for all personal files, hosted on Commons? /St1995 21:27, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Before talking about the number of DRs, you should check if there is really a need for a deletion. Then, some of these may not be in scope, but that has to be decided on individual basis. A mass DR of hundreds of images is not the right way to do it. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:47, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The files, as this automatic and massive DR of files of different authors, provinances, scopes (or lack of) and sources is itself out of scope. So  Delete this category as out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private playground of someone, wasting other peoples time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tm (talk • contribs)
  • The problem is not in this category. @Apocheir: Please do not add files in this category which may be notable for Commons. This cat is only for personal files! /St1995 21:07, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Can someone enlighten me what is a Unused personal file, as i tought it was about out pf scope images of people, but it seems that it includes images of cars, logos (and several others logos by the way). Tm (talk) 18:21, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Speaking as someone who's been adding a lot of files to this category lately... My conception of "personal file" includes not just pictures of the users, but pictures of the user's friends and family, promotional material for the user's musical projects, logos of the user's personal business, or anything else that is really only of interest to the uploader. Basically anything where someone's trying to use Commons as their own personal photo hosting site. There was no definition of "personal file" on the category, so it's up to individual interpretation. That said, as I stated on the Talk page, I was under the impression that there would be some sort of automated review before those files were nominated for deletion. At the very least, someone needs to clean out the files that are in use! -Apocheir (talk) 22:05, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep all, for now, and created separate DRs for individual files or groups thereof, based on some actual work. And, per Tm,  delete this useless and nonsensical category. It may be necessary to discuss long to reach an understanding of what a “personal image” is: One’s gut feeling is not enough. -- Tuválkin 21:41, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I think there is nothing wrong with the category in and of itself, but I would ask that someone please delete two files that I uploaded with regards to Alessandro Safina and Laura Maria Calefeteanu. I am very new here and did not read the policy on public domain photos closely enough. Thank you for bringing this issue to my attention. GrammerCracker96 (talk) 12:49, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment While this discussion is continuing (?) here, the DR template has been removed from the relevant page. If a majority is against these mass deletions, simply close this discussion so we can DR the files (those which are here I mean) individually or for uploader. In this situation the process is stalled and that is not correct. --E4024 (talk) 14:00, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - note that there are a significant number of copyvios (more than 1/3)- a few are kept (from user who made a few useful contributions, or image in scope). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Personal images that are of no educational use.

 Keep I think this fits fine under Category:Holi in the United States and other categories. It doesn't need to be a personal file. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:24, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This has been cropped so that it's just an image of the sign, not a personal image. In scope. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:26, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 03:54, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted most per nomination, kept a few which are in use/could be potentially used. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:44, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]