Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive/2016-44

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfie, not notable (first google hit is Commons, next is wikipediocracy), not used on user page Syced (talk) 05:36, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Applies to all of its dozens of other selfies too. Syced (talk) 05:37, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Some selfies are clearly out of scope, but some are interesting. For example, I added the nominated file into category:Creepy clowns. I'd like to keep that. Taivo (talk) 19:48, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:05, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Misrepresentation of File:Texas Tech Red Raiders Logo.svg Lubbockite (talk) 22:47, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:31, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 23:47, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:58, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:26, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:14, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized image Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:52, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:39, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:45, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yesi Doll (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused files, advertising or self-promotion

BrightRaven (talk) 14:49, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:39, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I posted a better one Lasthib (talk) 00:19, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 15:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 04:16, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:09, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely claim of own work on this colorized photo and/or artistic portrait of a man. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:48, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:10, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely claim of own work on this very small black and white portrait of a man. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:49, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:10, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely claim of own work on this tiny, low quality portrait of a man. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:49, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:10, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image of a non-notable person doing anything. GeorgHHtalk   16:22, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:44, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

what happened to the top of the building to the left? manipulated image, no educational value, please delete Albinfo (talk) 17:11, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]