Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive/2015-53

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A screenshot from a TV show. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 14:09, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:57, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 14:15, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:59, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small version of File:Boing TV.png. Louperivois Ψ @ 19:07, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Both Files are in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:42, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
fixed for main namespace. Louperivois Ψ @ 05:23, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Redirected. Natuur12 (talk) 20:59, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Teusinho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 20:59, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:53, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Antonio Kofi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 21:00, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:53, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:08, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:52, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manuel Cassuende (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 21:10, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:52, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:13, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:52, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:15, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:52, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Partho Biswas AS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 21:17, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:52, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Russia. Sergei Korolev died in 1966 so that the creator of his sculpture can't be dead for 70 years! Ras67 (talk) 01:12, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Speedily out of COM:SCOPE. It is private photo album shot of a non-notable person. A.Savin 13:39, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image of unknown person. No other useful contributions. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. DavidIvar (talk) 02:51, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Érico (msg) 06:22, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luciano Pleya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most likely no value for Wikimedia projects. Some of the descriptions are not filled in. Images look personal to me, and would therefore not be in project scope.

Wiki13 talk 21:29, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:43, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

stolen from http://www.poczet.com (you can see watermark on picture) 77.255.73.237 07:37, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: not own work. P 1 9 9   15:45, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

stolen from http://www.poczet.com (you can see watermark on picture) 77.255.73.237 07:39, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: not own work. P 1 9 9   15:46, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

stolen from http://www.poczet.com (you can see watermark on picture) 77.255.73.237 07:39, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: not own work. P 1 9 9   15:46, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

stolen from http://www.poczet.com (you can see watermark on picture) 77.255.73.237 07:41, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: not own work. P 1 9 9   15:46, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

stolen from http://www.poczet.com (you can see watermark on picture) 77.255.73.237 07:42, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: not own work. P 1 9 9   15:46, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

stolen from http://www.poczet.com (you can see watermark on picture) 77.255.73.237 07:42, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: not own work. P 1 9 9   15:46, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused TV capture, copyrighted? sole upload Pibwl (talk) 17:45, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: TV capture, no permission Wdwd (talk) 17:46, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Érico (msg) 18:39, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom. Wdwd (talk) 17:18, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no clear source, obviously false authorship, possible copyvio, probably wrong title Phso2 (talk) 00:09, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 10:32, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Voltteri (talk) 05:54, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:18, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork without obvious educational use. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Voltteri (talk) 10:12, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:22, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred, unused for two years Pippobuono (talk) 15:09, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:30, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Krd 15:59, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of scope Techman224Talk 04:36, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:40, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Characters are subject to Star Wars copyright. Those put on display are not homemade costumes, that might be exempt from copyright. Those on display in the United States (Anaheim) are not subject to Freedom of Panorama. Those on temporarily on display, whether outside a museum or in a shopping mall in the UK, in a movie theatre in Austrlia, or in an airport in Singapore are also not subject to Freedom of Panorama. I imagine most (if not all) of the rest of the images in the category are also subject to copyright too, but I'll leave them for others to nominate.

Themightyquill (talk) 13:21, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm aware of that, which is why I tried not to tag any cosplay homemade costumes. (Forgive me if I did so accidentally). Most (all?) of these images are not people wearing costumes but effectively statues of characters on display. In these cases, it seems the people that made the "costumes" (in most cases, I think these are produced in association with the star wars franchise) are likely not the people granting the commons license. - Themightyquill (talk) 18:35, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Do you also consider the TIE fighter exhibit to be copyrighted? And do you have an official link to this Star Wars copyright? Wolcott (talk) 08:10, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Wolcott: Which TIE fighter exhibit? There's no reason to think that any notable features of Star Wars films would be in the public domain. You can't make and sell star wars toys or posters or clothing without the permission of the copyright holder. This is no different. - Themightyquill (talk) 18:24, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Then how do you explain other images which have been around for some time now yet were never deleted? Not Star Wars but surely there's no difference.

And do you have an official link to this claim of Star Wars copyright? Wolcott (talk) 03:41, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Some of the comments above are off base. Costumes per se are not subject to copyright if they do not include a mask. Case law has made it impossible to claim US copyright on anything that is "clothing" because it is ultilitarian -- exceptions are things like photographs screened onto a tee shirt, but the costume itself has no copyright. With that understood, however, costumed manequins do have a copyright as sculpture. Many of these fall into that category. Also, masks have a copyright, and all of these figures are masked. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These are all 2D art. We cannot keep them on Commons without a free license from the artist.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:33, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Each of these images includes at least one masked figure. If they are mannequins, then the whole figure is copyrighted as sculpture. If they are humans, then only the masks have copyrights as the rest of the costume is utilitarian. In either case, however, we cannot keep them on Commons without licenses from all of the creators.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Materialscientist (talk) 07:05, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]