Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive/2015-2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just an unused screengrab from File:Bombing of Hamburg.ogg. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:21, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Johnny Alvaro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possibly useful, but without a description, hard to know.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:57, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:21, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure what this is, how it's useful? The Zalgo text title doesn't help either, to be honest. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:59, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:22, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ضياء المنتظر (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos and kind of radio broadcast. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:25, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ضياء المنتظر (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyright violations or out of project scope

Didym (talk) 16:18, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


deleted. INeverCry 20:00, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ضياء المنتظر (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by user:Materialscientist , see log.Wdwd (talk) 20:27, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ضياء المنتظر (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-free logo?

Stefan4 (talk) 18:09, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by user:Materialscientist , see log.Wdwd (talk) 20:27, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private image, out of scope. Achim (talk) 16:09, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless. See COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:47, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, personal family photo Danrok (talk) 23:42, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I uploaded them because it's a form of play that's common for children, and not well represented in our current collection in Category:Children playing. They aren't random personal photos; I uploaded them because I think they have educational value.--ragesoss (talk) 14:42, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per ragesoss –⁠moogsi (blah) 11:01, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, personal family photo Danrok (talk) 23:41, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I uploaded them because it's a form of play that's common for children, and not well represented in our current collection in Category:Children playing. They aren't random personal photos; I uploaded them because I think they have educational value.--ragesoss (talk) 14:43, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


You could improve the images, the background is distracting, possibly there is a green garden nearby to use as a backdrop. It helps if the tops of the swords are in the frame, so it is clear they are swords rather than a maypole for example. I have no opinion on keep or delete for these. Penyulap 02:38, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per ragesoss –⁠moogsi (blah) 11:02, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Versions of this photo have been published on 9/10 September 2013, a month before the upload here, at [1] and at [2]. No evidence of free license.

We'd need a formal release via COM:OTRS for this photo if we were to keep it. It's also unused. Lupo 12:10, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal logo. Lupo 12:10, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 12:11, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Low quality; and furthermore shows some artwork of unknown provenance. Lupo 12:16, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 12:17, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 12:24, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 12:30, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation DirkVE (talk) 16:32, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal logo. Lupo 17:58, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal graphics based on unknown photo. Lupo 18:16, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo. Lupo 18:17, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 13:17, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unsharp photo of soccer ball with nonsense description. In Wikipedia, this would be speedied as a hoax. Lupo 18:20, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo. Overlay of two images, per watermark from some other website. Provenance unclear; no evidence of "own work" or of free license. Lupo 18:24, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:51, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 03:15, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 20:36, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal logo. Lupo 20:36, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 20:40, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful - also, half of the subject is cropped out, so possibly out of scope - unusable INeverCry 21:11, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Probable copyvio. Certainly out of scope. Green Giant (talk) 03:31, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality unused image with lots of better analogs (Category:Full moon photographs) Stas (talk) 00:34, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:25, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo. Lupo 16:36, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo. Lupo 16:43, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal logo. Note that this is not a real graffito; there's some picture generator out there that generates these with customized text. Just see the Google search. Lupo 16:45, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:46, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture; very blurry from camera shake. Lupo 16:50, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Totally irrelevant for the project. Propaganda poster of a terrorist organization. "Description" is an concealed attempt to use commons as a web host. Vigyani (talk) 18:03, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 19:01, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:56, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused text-only file. Lupo 19:08, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:56, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 19:12, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Low-quality photo of a beach; no indication where this might be: useless; not educationally useful. Lupo 19:45, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:56, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture/logo; advertisement. Lupo 20:49, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:00, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

iCloud logo. Certainly not "own work". Copyrights probably Apple's. Lupo 20:54, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:00, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: mobile phone screenshot showing some web page with only text. Not educationally useful; advertisement. Lupo 20:55, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:17, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 21:18, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:21, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparently some test, user's only upload Pibwl (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:21, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File comes from [3] and might be from 1967. It's watermarked. Unlikely to be own work. Original source, publication date and place, and photographer are not known (to us), so copyright status cannot be determined. (Photo probably taken in New York; compare [4].) Lupo 21:56, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:21, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GameOverTown (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All uploads clearly (at best) personal use only fluff, but not used anywhere.

Ubcule (talk) 21:59, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:22, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and/or unused personal. Ubcule (talk) 22:19, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:01, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and/or unused personal. Ubcule (talk) 22:19, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 02:01, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by S.subramaniyan111181 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

Capricorn4049 (talk) 11:00, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:06, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by S.subramaniyan111181 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Significant tell-tale evidence patterns pointing to fact that some or all of this batch are copyright violations. Including:-

  • Despite fact that these are professional-looking and/or retouched images that must have taken a lot of work, there's a near-complete lack of background detail or context.
  • Images have all been uploaded by the Mobile Web app, despite being Photoshopped looking.
  • Many can be found elsewhere on web via Google Images- *very* widespread for images only six months or so old (according to their dates here). Admittedly, some Commons images *do* become popular- I've seen some of *my* images return countless results after several years, but Google reports dates for these images going back *way* before their claimed EXIF and upload dates to Commons.
  • Some available in higher resolution elsewhere

ADDITIONAL; Just noticed after I started this request that user has already had numerous copyvios deleted.

Some detail on a case-by-case basis below.

Oddly, it's only these early images, which the user has chosen to plaster his/her name on, that appear to be copyvios. Later uploads seem to check out as legit- they look more like regular snaps and they don't get any other hits on Google Images. So despite the fact that this user is way past any benefit of the doubt, I haven't nominated those.

Ubcule (talk) 22:33, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


deleted. INeverCry 02:26, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyvio. Widespread on web, in much higher resolutions. Ubcule (talk) 23:24, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:28, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, no description, unclear what educational use it would have. --ghouston (talk) 08:54, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, no educational use. --ghouston (talk) 08:57, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotional material, limited in-scope use due to processing and text. Ubcule (talk) 15:13, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused; text only. Lupo 15:23, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture of dirty loo; overlaid text spoils any marginal documentary usefulness this might otherwise have had. Also inappropriate title. Lupo 15:27, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Besides, looks like a different person than on File:Lloyd Williams at The Arms Park 2013-10-21 18-03.jpg. Lupo 15:30, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal graphics. Lupo 15:31, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and possible copyvio. Ubcule (talk) 15:34, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a photo behind glass. Unclear who this is, and who owns the copyright on the original photo. Lupo 15:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too unsharp to be useful. Lupo 15:47, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too unsharp to be useful. Lupo 15:53, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Very unsharp, too. Misleading title: this is not an "athlete", it's a boy jumping maybe 1ft high: not enough for a real slam dunk. Maybe in 10 years... Lupo 16:12, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 16:14, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Synozins (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These appear to be personal art from a not-notable artist and are therefore out of scope. Commons is not Flickr and hosts only images that are useful for an educational purpose.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 16:21, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal logo. Lupo 16:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused advertisement. Lupo 17:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope:unused personal picture based on a background image that is widely available on the Internet and for which there is no evidence of any free license. Lupo 17:16, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo. Lupo 17:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope:unused personal picture. Lupo 17:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too unsharp to be useful. Lupo 17:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, unused, his only activity was to create a userpage on en-wiki (without a photo though) Pibwl (talk) 17:56, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



 Kept, Use found on tl.wiki. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 01:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly a derivative work of this photo used on that page. Does the OTRS ticket also cover that photo? Lupo 18:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: FASTILY 02:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work from this video; I'd say at about 0:32. The video evidently is already a copyvio; the TV station's logo has been blurred; and I don't think the OTRS ticket covers this video/TV broadcast anyway. Lupo 19:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:40, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 20:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 20:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, as unused personal image. Commons is not Facebook. Stuchka (talk) 20:57, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photoshopped photo; inclusion in sq:Letërsia romantike shqiptare appears to be vandalism. Lupo 21:11, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal screenshot. Lupo 21:12, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, single contribution Pibwl (talk) 21:18, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:18, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: nothing recognizeable here. Also inappropriate title. Lupo 21:21, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:47, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can't find an educational value in this portrait (however I gave it a category), maybe someone else can. Pibwl (talk) 23:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete Google image search claims this is Tameka "Tiny" Cottle. TinEye finds [5] this link (from 2010) among others. While our image is larger than most copies found on the net, ours seems to be scaled up. Copyvio. --Sebari (talk) 21:46, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:23, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 23:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo of some blurred painiting, unused, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 23:25, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, Out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:36, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nomination, overlaid text. Tony Webster (talk) 01:48, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Given the description (just a website address), it looks like this was uploaded primarily for advertisement or self-promotion purposes. Lupo 06:04, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 DeleteAgree with Lupo Snickerty03 (talk) 05:27, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused text-only screenshot. Lupo 06:07, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused text-only screenshot. Lupo 06:08, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't see a "fatsuit" here, and that face looks spooky. Delete as vandalism. Lupo 06:10, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Two days after this ugly thumb went INUSE the page was promoted from stub to article. I don't get it. –Be..anyone (talk) 12:09, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:14, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 KeepSeems a potentially notable person. Snickerty03 (talk) 05:30, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. A total of 9060 Google hits for "ankit barot", but evidently about different persons. Which Ankit Barot do you think this shows? Which one did you consider "potentially notable"? (I guess we're all "potentially notable", aren't we?) Lupo 05:45, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:15, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete SPEEDY requested. This is included as child pornography in some countries. Not suitable for Commons. Snickerty03 (talk) 05:32, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:16, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too unsharp to be useful. Lupo 06:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some instagram nonsense (square size...); not exactly useful. Unused. Lupo 06:27, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused screenshot showing some image apparently from some search engine. Lupo 06:38, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too dark; unused. Lupo 06:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not useful, just a line of some colored dots on black. Lupo 06:50, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: not educationally useful. Lupo 06:53, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:53, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal doodle. Lupo 07:04, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 07:05, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete SPEEDY requested. This is obvious and included as child pornography in some countries. Not at all suitable for Commons. Snickerty03 (talk) 05:37, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree this should be deleted, where's the "pornography" in this? Lupo 05:46, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In some countries, which I won't name here, any "unauthorised" photo taken of a child which is uploaded to a "social networking site" is included as child pornography. These countries don't accept that Wikipedia is not a social networking site. Snickerty03 (talk) 06:06, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's a kid not at all afraid of an old, big, bored dog. On a very bad unused thumbnail in need of a  Delete as out of scope. If you really see what you say ask folks you trust if they also see anything out of line here for a reality check. Nevermind, per Special:Contributions/Snickerty03, I don't get this sock war. –Be..anyone (talk) 12:28, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal pet photo; low quality. Lupo 07:05, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal screenshot. Also text-only. Lupo 09:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused game(?) screenshot. Lupo 09:43, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused text-only file. Lupo 09:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture (twitter account of that person ends in "watto", so I'm assuming the uploader is the subject). Lupo 09:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal logo. Lupo 09:51, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless. Very blurry, lots of upscaling artifacts. Lupo 09:52, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

First, the source publication[6] is CC-BY-NC, which we don't accept. (All right, probably that table in isolation is not copyrightable material anyway...) Second, this table is useless without context. Third, the file is unused. Lupo 10:04, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Derivative of 2D, so not OK. Snickerty03 (talk) 05:45, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 10:05, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep in scope. Has educational value broadly construed. Snickerty03 (talk) 05:48, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: nondescript photo through car window with misleading and misspelled title. Lupo 10:24, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Bazj (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Castlemate (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Trademark violation. 2620:0:1000:437C:C11E:51A7:85F0:B94B 20:23, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Misopened DR with Speedy as reason. Logo is bellow the Threshold of originality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amitie 10g (talk • contribs) 2014-12-23T17:05:57‎ (UTC)


Kept: below COM:TOO. JuTa 21:22, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Trademark violation and unauthorized use of registered trademark logo, Norway Registration No. 278520 and Swiss registration No. 664704 and U.S. Application No. 86303300}} 2620:0:1000:437C:D0AF:8505:C747:51EB 17:09, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept: Per previous Dr resolved as kept. Logo very bellow the Threshold of originality. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:15, 6 January 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some unused logo, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 23:14, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:26, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsche person.Vera Erameychuck ist richtig Imaj77 (talk) 00:23, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:37, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It can read copyrighted writings. No COM:FOP#Japan and copyvio as literary work by ja:森薫 (実業家). LudwigSK (talk) 02:38, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:34, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]