Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by LaDanian1000000

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LaDanian1000000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images come from 3 nearly identical single-purpose, zero-follower Flickr accounts created around the same time this year: Justin Wang, Terry Holt and [1]. The images are all low-res photos of single NFL teams that are screenshots of web images, not original photographs. Looked at together, they appear to be an attempt to Flickrwash images from the web/social media.

Ytoyoda (talk) 14:10, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:01, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LaDanian1000000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very small sizes without EXIFs, unlikely to be own works

Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:21, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I UPLOADED THE ALL OF THE ORIGINAL IMAGES, PLEASE DON'T DELETE THE PHOTOS NOW?


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LaDanian1000000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Stills from unfree videos.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:05, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The last 2 files comes from free licensed video from YouTube (even if the CC YouTube license seems to be CC-BY 3.0 and not CC-BY-SA 4.0 as stated) so -assuming that uploaders on YouTube are really the authors of the videos- they seems to bear no problem. For all other images effectively the video where they came from now doesn't bear a CC license but they had it at the time of upload (according to the Wayback Machine Archive link provided in the pages of the files). In my opinion it safe to delete as precautionary principle these last files since we don't know why the license was changed (maybe uploader realized not to have all the right to free license it ?) --Civitas13 (talk) 07:34, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'll second Civitas13's comment and I can confirm that the Atlanta Falcons used to publish content under a CC license (@LaDanian1000000: , I recommend using the {{YouTube}} template for future uploads, since it comes with a license review template attached, and it's a more specific license). As long as Falcons were using their own footage and not video from NFL Films or the league broadcaster partners (you know, This telecast is copyrighted by the NFL for the private use of our audience...), I think they're fine. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:28, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
When I added the photos from the Atlanta Falcons' Youtube channel, it was Creative Commons Reuse Allowed. If the images were added when reuse was allowed, can they stay? LaDanian1000000 (talk)
@LaDanian1000000: I think you're in the clear — Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. The source video for the first image had a free CC license in December 2019, and that still applies. Ytoyoda (talk) 21:06, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
can the deletion tags be removed now? I think the pictures are in the clear. LaDanian1000000 (talk) 20:13, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The videos are free. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:57, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]