Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by David S. Soriano
Files uploaded by David S. Soriano (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal artworks by uploader. Commons has a specific scope and is not a free webhosting service. Some artworks are also AI generated, which has its own copyright issues, as they are derivative works of numerous other works.
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:54, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- These uploads have educational value and a number have been downloaded and used by viewers. Pattern recognition on these uploads will indicate they are quite original but certainly not ex anhilio, as only Cezanne and a few others can claim.
- I used AI to generate crude drawings as a starting point and 95-99& of the creative work was done by me.
- Growing numbers of artists are utilizing AI/ machine -learning, just as surgeons utilize robotics.
- Most of these digital contributions are currently being painted , by me, and the uploads are for the benefit of viewers.
- This is now the 2022 version of Fauvism, Impressionism and Post- Impressionism. David S. Soriano (talk) 03:10, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- I neglected to mention that one watercolor was completed by me and uploaded for our users. D.S. David S. Soriano (talk) 03:13, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- One of my digital artwork designs ( all original) was recently used in a scientific paper on 'ibogaine' and 'depression'.
- [1]https://bigthink.com/health/ibogaine-treatment/
- I upload my work for allowing others to consider utilizing them for the common social good. David S. Soriano (talk) 03:15, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
- I neglected to mention that one watercolor was completed by me and uploaded for our users. D.S. David S. Soriano (talk) 03:13, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep You could probably argue images like File:Crayon Block (David Soriano).jpg are OOS and I'm sure others are. That said a good partition, maybe half, are fine. I dont' feel like going through or listing every single file that might or might not be in scope though. So my suggest would be that the nominator organizes them based on theme or something and re-nominates the that are clearly (at least close to it) OOS (it's not a bright line BTW). That said, there's no guideline that "user created artwork" is automatically OOS. As David S. Soriano showed in their last comment it can serve a purpose sometimes. I still think smaller batches of nominations would be worth doing though. We just impossible to evaluate every image on it's own merits when there's this many in a single nomination. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:00, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep most of these. Many of these artworks have potential educational uses. File:The Tugboat.png is a fairly good-quality illustration of a tugboat, and Category:Tugboats in art has only fifty items in it. File:The Female Cave Artist.png is one of the very few pictures on Commons showing stone-age cave painters at work. Delete File:Tomatoes Or Grapes?.jpg, as it appears to be based on the copyrighted new Sun-Maid logo rather than the out-of-copyright original one. Chiolite (talk) 05:29, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: without prejudice to re-nomination per Adamant. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by David S. Soriano (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal art by a non notable artist, small size / low quality, out of scope.
Yann (talk) 07:30, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Jmabel, Omphalographer, J. M. Pearson, Belbury, HyperGaruda, Emu, and RodRabelo7: --Trade (talk) 20:03, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Whym: --Trade (talk) 20:04, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope; if we ever need something like any of these, then presumably they can be generated more or less on demand. - Jmabel ! talk 20:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete weird useless imagery, oos Dronebogus (talk) 21:02, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Emu (talk) 23:39, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete; not much else to add, but here is a link to a related deletion request for posterity. --HyperGaruda (talk) 19:42, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Not useful--Trade (talk) 19:58, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Jmabel rationale regarding AI-generated media (especially low-quality ones) is rather good: if we ever need something like any of these, then presumably they can be generated more or less on demand. RodRabelo7 (talk) 22:54, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Unanimous consensus. User didn't respond, and is blocked for a month. --Yann (talk) 11:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by David S. Soriano (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per previous discussions of this user's content, these are further out-of-COM:SCOPE personal digital artworks, some of them AI generated/assisted. None are in use. (The user is now under an indefinite block for continuing to upload this kind of thing.)
- File:Panpsychism Perspective.png
- File:Woman In Profile.png
- File:Cubism Perspective II.png
- File:Lab Scene.png
- File:Art Deco 2023.png
- File:The Lonely Dragon Tree.png
- File:Electricity & Powers That Be.png
- File:Electricity Is Alive.png
- File:The Two Faces.png
- File:Fire In Sky.png
- File:Dragon Tree.png
Belbury (talk) 11:18, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Unusably low quality, misgeneration issues, and no realistic usefulness. Prototyperspective (talk) 11:31, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Personal artwork with no educational use case, regardless of whether it's AI-generated or not. Images like File:Cubism Perspective II.png in particular are not useful as illustrations of the Cubist art movement, as artwork from that period is largely in the public domain, and this modern piece barely even resembles Cubist art. Omphalographer (talk) 21:06, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:14, 31 January 2024 (UTC)