Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/11/27
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
This file was initially tagged by TARGET6tidiem as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author's request Used in Wikidata, uploaded more than 1 week ago. Why do you want to delete this file? Yann (talk) 12:51, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio: https://cdn.vatgia.vn/pictures/fullsize/2020/05/15/1589532042-yuf.jpg. --Yann (talk) 12:53, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for (modern) buildings in Korea, per COM:FOP South Korea. This image was made to show the complete building, so it has to be deleted. Ellywa (talk) 12:34, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete This image was uploaded by me when I didn't know there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. So please delete this file. Ox1997cow (talk) 13:04, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: thanks for your quick response. As there is no doubt - uploader agrees with deletion of the file - this DR can be closed. --Ellywa (talk) 14:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Willschmut (talk · contribs)
[edit]PD claims by this user cannot be trusted. Sources are given, but there is no evidence of free licensing at these sources. Subjects appear to be old; nominating for discussion in case anyone can find a legitimate PD claim.
Brianjd (talk) 09:27, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: The uploader has been globally locked as a sock puppet of a banned user. All works by the user should be treated with caution, if not outright deleted. From Hill To Shore (talk) 09:39, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete File:Peel Commission.gif as a copyright violation. The author is identified as "Jewish virtual library" but the copyright notice on the linked website makes no reference to Creative Commons or public domain.[1] The current claim of public domain is clearly a copyright violation. I have tagged the image for speedy deletion on that basis. From Hill To Shore (talk) 11:15, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete File:Ancient Menorah Coin.gif. The file author is identified as a webhosting platform from where the image was taken. This is the equivalent of finding a poster on the side of a building and claiming that the building was the author. There is no indication at source on the creator, date of creation, any earlier publication or any licence conditions; we therefore must assume that the image is still in copyright. A secondary layer of confusion is that the website includes a note that it is a mirror of an even older website, which further obscures the original source details. As the upload is by a banned user, the usual extension of good faith does not apply; we already have evidence of bad faith editing. From Hill To Shore (talk) 11:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:17, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
COM:REDUNDANT to File:748Muntinlupa Cavite Expressway 16.jpg. Another COM:WEBHOSTing by now-blocked Judgefloro (talk · contribs). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:27, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:37, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
COM:REDUNDANT to File:748Muntinlupa Cavite Expressway 16.jpg. Also has lesser impressive angle as compared to the mentioned file. Another COM:WEBHOSTing by now-blocked Judgefloro (talk · contribs). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:28, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:37, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
per discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Papa Smurf Barnstar.png - legitimate use of Belgian FOP or not? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:55, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This character/drawing comes from a public space close to the Central Station in Brussels. We have freedom of panorama here. Before uploading I only improved the colors. .Anja. (talk) 10:23, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment As in the other discussion, there are limitations on Belgian FOP that may be incompatible with free licensing and may be incompatible with the particular edits the uploader made. While I'm sure the uploader acted in good faith, I do not believe that this is solely an improvement of the colors, such as by using levels or white balancing. Even the original version of this file, before the uploader "improved the colors", seems too matte, too perfect to be a regular photograph. I believe questions also need to be asked about the meaning of "permanent" within the relevant Belgian law, and how this is determined. Is intent that it be permanent what matters? Or that it becomes something akin to a "fixture" (as we use the term in Anglo-American law) rather than simply being on display? And what do the limitations "provided that the reproduction or the communication of the work is as it is found there and that this reproduction or communication does not infringe upon the normal exploitation of the work and does not cause unreasonable harm to the legitimate interests of the author" mean? I believe this can be read as prohibiting derivative works and "share-alike"-style licenses. 69.174.144.79 13:38, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- See all files on Category:Parcours BD for comparison, this is just a picture of a very good painting with very few improvment. For the prohibition, if read strictly it would forbid all uses of FOP which would defeat the point and here, I don't see how it could affect the normal exploitation (like the sales) of the comics (in contrary, it makes publicity and could potentially make it sale better). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 18:50, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: FOP, no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 18:35, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
FreedomFest 2021 photos
[edit]- File:Boomer Shannon (51400973011).jpg
- File:Boomer Shannon (51401952890).jpg
- File:Dan Fishman (51400225587).jpg
- File:Dan Fishman (51400225597).jpg
- File:Jess Mears and Boomer Shannon (51400225507).jpg
- File:Jess Mears and Boomer Shannon (51400225557).jpg
- File:Jess Mears and Boomer Shannon (51400973036).jpg
- File:Jess Mears and Boomer Shannon (51401234528).jpg
- File:Larry Sharpe (51400973051).jpg
- File:Larry Sharpe (51401734499).jpg
- File:Nicholas Sarwark (51400225607).jpg
- File:Nicholas Sarwark (51400973106).jpg
- File:Nicholas Sarwark (51401234563).jpg
- File:Nicholas Sarwark (51401234573).jpg
- File:Nicholas Sarwark (51401234613).jpg
- File:Nicholas Sarwark (51401734444) (cropped).jpg
- File:Nicholas Sarwark (51401734444) (cropped 2).jpg
- File:Nicholas Sarwark (51401734444).jpg
- File:Nicholas Sarwark (51401734459).jpg
- File:Nicholas Sarwark (51401734554).jpg
- File:Nicholas Sarwark (51401734589).jpg
- File:Nicholas Sarwark and Dan Fishman (51401234508).jpg
- File:Nicholas Sarwark and Dan Fishman (51401734509).jpg
- File:Nicholas Sarwark and Dan Fishman (51401952870).jpg
As the original uploader, I would like to request deletion of this unused content. ― Tartan357 Talk 03:57, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:48, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kaesasakiart (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art, needs OTRS. But they are all copyvios anyway as most of them are found here - https://www.jacksonsart.com/blog/2020/03/27/kae-sasaki-paintings-with-layered-meanings/ - not own work as claimed
- File:Kae Sasaki.jpg
- File:16ksAllegoryI2013.jpg
- File:17ksAllegoryII2013.jpg
- File:2014ShiroNoda.jpg
- File:2015TenThousandLeavesIII.jpg
- File:Kae Sasaki Viewfinder II 2019 48X36.jpg
- File:Kae Sasaki Post Office 2016 36X48.jpg
- File:Viewfinder2018KaeSasaki.jpg
- File:Kae Sasaki Red Burden (2015) oil on gold-leafed panel 48X24.jpg
- File:Kae Sasaki take pains be perfect 2017 36X48.jpg
- File:Kae Sasaki Blue Vessel II 2016 36X48.jpg
- File:Kae Sasaki I hear it well but scarcely grasp it III 2018 36X48.jpg
- File:Kae Sasaki I hear it well but scarcely grasp it II 2018 36X48.jpg
- File:Kae Sasaki I hear it well but scarcely grasp it IV 2018 36X48.jpg
- File:Kae Sasaki I hear it well but scarcely grasp it IX 2020 36X48.jpg
- File:Kae Sasaki I hear it well but scarcely grasp it VIII 2020 36X48.jpg
- File:Kae Sasaki I hear it well but scarcely grasp it I 2017 36X48.jpg
- File:12.-Kae-Sasaki-studio-photo.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:44, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:49, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jcabarca2000 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertising/spam - outside of project scope
- File:Partner Microsoft.jpg
- File:Soluciones microsoft.jpg
- File:VPN soluciones Remotas.jpg
- File:CONTRATE SOPORTE INFORMÁTICO, RECUPERACIÓN DE INFORMACIÓN.jpg
- File:VPN Y TERMINAL SERVER.jpg
- File:Soporte Informatico Systemonline.jpg
- File:Juan Carlos Abarca Porperello.jpg
B (talk) 13:27, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:42, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork with no permission Sahaib3005 (talk) 08:14, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 11:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 09:20, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 13:00, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE personal photograph. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:36, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 13:01, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
There are no official TLD logos. Self-made or 3rd party ones are not necessarily PD. Achim55 (talk) 13:06, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Info: Author agrees with deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 17:49, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- For the record, the author (Alex Mitchell of The Goodies) wrote in revision 610309057 on the template's talk page:
- I accept / I surrender, you can delete the template.
- Brianjd (talk) 08:25, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- For the record, the author (Alex Mitchell of The Goodies) wrote in revision 610309057 on the template's talk page:
- The numerous broken links were a red flag: the same template is on the English Wikipedia, and I have nominated that one for deletion too. Brianjd (talk) 06:04, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete fake license, likely original research. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:21, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 11:38, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Thumbnail size, almost certainly not uploader's own work but a copyvio. Hanyangprofessor2 (talk) 16:24, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Blush license does not allow rehosting etc - therefore incompatible with Commons firefly ( t · c ) 12:54, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Minorax at 00:17, 9 December 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Voldemort271 --Krdbot 04:15, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Imagery on cutout is under copyright, and Japan does not have Freedom of Panorama for artistic works. firefly ( t · c ) 12:31, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Approved "GFDL" and "CC BY-SA" by the copyright holder.
- -> http://ads.selfip.com/users/monami/image_character.html#top
- It is rare that the copyright owner himself permits the free use of a copyrighted work that incorporates multiple commercial characters belonging to multiple organizations.
- This photo is a valuable material with high artistic value as well as the problem of copyright has been solved.--SetoMonamer (talk) 05:51, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Freedom of panorama is not allowed in Japan. But not because the country tramples on the rights of copyright holders. Copyright holders not only have the right to claim copyright, but also the right to let others freely use their work. No one is allowed to infringe that right. This photo has the fact that the photographer and the copyright owner have allowed it for free use. You can easily see it on the official website. Therefore, if you respect the rights of the author, you need to keep this photo. We must respect the rights and interests of people.--202.217.208.89 23:54, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment :The Moe characters in the photo are well known in Japan.
- In the popularity poll that gathered mascots belonging to companies, it has recorded the first place in a row among more than 4,300 mascot characters[2].
- On other websites, it ranks first among more than 3,400 mascot characters, both in terms of attention and rating[3].
- Naturally, this mascot character is sometimes featured in magazines and on the cover[4].
- Not only the bibliography but also JP-POST issued commemorative stamps for this mascot character.
- Despite being such a mascot character, the copyright owner was willing to accept the uploader's request and allow free use of this photo.
- Probably for our benefit.
- It is extremely rare for a copyright holder to grant free use of a commercial work, and we must be grateful.
- I feel that this photo is truly valuable and must be cherished.--118.7.26.182 07:51, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- It is a supplementary matter.
- This photo is not a copyrighted work licensed by the copyright owner after uploading or due to misunderstanding of copyright infringement.
- I uploaded it because the copyright owner allowed me to use it freely under Creative Commons.
- At the time of the first edition, we also provided a link to evidence that the copyright owner approved free use under Creative Commons, so it's clear if you check the records.
- It is also clearly stated on the official website that the person who took the picture is certainly me.--SetoMonamer (talk) 03:17, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- It is suspected that the deletion request was due to misunderstanding or mischief.
- Photo was upload in a legally.--211.127.157.38 09:22, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- You can see this mascot character in the this article[PDF].
- This article is published by a publisher listed on the First Section of the Tokyo Stock Exchange and is reliable.
- This article tells us that the official domain used by the copyright holder of this mascot character is "ads.selfip.com".
- The license page I have shown is published on under the "ads.selfip.com".
- The license page clearly states that the copyrights of all the characters in the photo belong to the same copyright holder.
- In addition, it is also shown that the author of this mascot character has licensed the use of this photo under the GFDL and CC-BY-SA.
- The name of the copyright holder of the mascot character is "Monami Gentsuki project steering committee" = "Japanese:原付萌奈美ぷろじぇくと運営委員会".
- You can see the name of the same author in the photo.
- You should be able to objectively and clearly confirm that the copyright holder of the mascot character has approved the use of this photo under the GFDL and CC-BY-SA.--SetoMonamer (talk) 14:50, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- I got some advice from the Commons admin yesterday.
- I followed the advice and updated the license version and added the author attribute to the Nowiki tag.
- The Commons administrator has contacted me that I have confirmed these updates.--SetoMonamer (talk) 04:57, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- The license or photo page has been updated correctly according to the administrator's instructions and the administrator is aware of it.
- Appropriate licenses have been shown and in addition reviewed by the administrator.
- It is too irrational that the keep of this photo is not executed in spite of this.
- Obviously there is no problem with the license.--211.127.156.4 00:02, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: License reviewed. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:09, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 04:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
it seems this picture that is captured from this video is not free: https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5wuep8 151.246.97.5 10:49, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- این تصویر از منبع زیر گرفته شده و مشکلی ندارد و آزاد است: youtube: Women Praying In Bikini — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoomanrd (talk • contribs) 11:02, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if it's free. But based on WP policy it may be allowed to use it on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.246.103.55 (talk • contribs) 15:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 19:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Have better version File:Flag of Talysh-Mugan Autonomous Republic (the talysh national flag).jpg Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 12:11, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom, unused. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:58, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Icon of a mobile game 07 (talk) 12:39, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:59, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster, no evidence of release under a free license, copyvio. Hanyangprofessor2 (talk) 16:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:57, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation. Need more name of artist, when or where it was first published to be certain that is in the Public Domain Headlock0225 (talk) 18:22, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- This Tumblr post credits a similar image to en:Yogendra Rastogi who died only in 2015. howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 19:42, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- See also: Commons:Village pump#File:Baby Krishna 2.jpg. Brianjd (talk) 06:11, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:52, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Gelora Bung Karno Stadium
[edit]Games are ongoing in some of the images, but architectural interiors are too noticeable and prominent to be de minimis. There is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia; the author of the stadium is architect Friedrich Silaban, who died in 1984.
- File:GBK Main Stadium during Athletics APG2018 (1).jpg
- File:GBK Main Stadium during Athletics APG2018 (2).jpg
- File:GBK Main Stadium during Athletics APG2018 (3).jpg
- File:GBK Main Stadium during Athletics APG2018 (4).jpg
- File:Gelora Bung Karno Stadium in 180-degree view; October 2011.jpeg
- File:SUGBK 14Jan18.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:15, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Strong oppose. These are 3-year-old files and never bothered anyone but you. No FOP does not mean no permission at all. Flix11 (talk) 08:43, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Flix11: see COM:CARES. Commons cares for artists' copyrights, even if majority of the citizens of the no-FOP country does not. The principle "what is not written in the law is allowed" is strictly forbidden. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:18, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Statement like "The copyright owner will not bother to sue or cannot afford to" violated Commons' precautionary principle--A1Cafel (talk) 16:25, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Commons policy is to obey copyright laws of source countries. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:13, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Imagen de portada y logo para la promoción de la página web campanariourbano.com LeoMuroGarcia (talk) 05:28, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per prompt uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:09, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Imagen de portada y logo para la promoción de la página web campanariourbano.com LeoMuroGarcia (talk) 05:30, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per prompt uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:08, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:49, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:15, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
empty, useless Palauenc05 (talk) 09:40, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:20, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused drawing with vague descriptio. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 11:39, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:21, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE photograph of a non-notable individual. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:40, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted also false license/copyright violation. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:23, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
I have cropped it but wanted to overwrite/ created by the mistake Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 11:53, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:37, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Not an original work by VOA. Clearly written on the image that it has been grabbed from social media. 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:09, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Brianjd (talk) 05:59, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:39, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:29, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:44, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:32, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:44, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
content with no encyclopedic value 𐰇𐱅𐰚𐰤 (talk) 12:35, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Unused personal photo by non-contributor -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:45, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
nicht mehr relevant Austernfischer ry (talk) 14:49, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:52, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
nicht mehr relevant Austernfischer ry (talk) 14:49, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:52, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
nicht mehr relevant Austernfischer ry (talk) 14:50, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:51, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted content. Using a camera to screenshot something off a monitor or poster does not make it your "own work". Plain old copyvio - but in use. I also can not see any way how this could be seen as ineligible for copyright (so {{PD-ineligible}} is out) D-Kuru (talk) 15:04, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; COM:DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:23, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom, also doubt uploader is license holder. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:24, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Prominently featuring copyrighted game; falls under COM:DW. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:03, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:16, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
probably copyviol (professional shoot), cf. Google Images — danyele 00:31, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:17, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:17, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
This picture was used to install a fictitious person as the trainer of the Trinidad and Tobago national football team in the Spanish Wikipedia, see https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Selecci%C3%B3n_de_f%C3%BAtbol_de_Trinidad_y_Tobago&diff=next&oldid=137177778. Also see the other upload by the user, a copyvio. Grueslayer (talk) 02:49, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:17, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
The exif says that the copyright holder is "ARUNPRASATHPHOTOGRAPHY" which is different than the user's name here. Unless we get an official release, this should be deleted. —SpacemanSpiff 03:42, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:17, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Oxyman (talk) 03:44, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:17, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Oxyman (talk) 03:48, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:18, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Duckstation
[edit]A previous DR established that these files are definitely in scope, but did not resolve the copyright issues. It seems clear that the duck logo is under GPLv3 per the linked repository, but:
- File:Logo Duckstation.png's description says that it is under CC BY-SA 4.0.
- I am not sure about the text, or the files as a whole (for those files that combine the duck with text). Even though these files are claimed "own work" under CC BY-SA 4.0, none of these licence claims seem credible.
I cannot find any uses elsewhere on the web to compare these files to.
- File:Duckstation and Black wordmark.svg
- File:Duckstation and White wordmark.svg
- File:Duckstation-logo and Black wordmark.svg
- File:Duckstation-logo and White wordmark.svg
- File:Duckstation-logo and wordmark (Vertical).svg
- File:Duckstation-logo and wordmark(Design style).png
- File:Logo Duckstation.png
Brianjd (talk) 04:29, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- It is possible that some or all of this material is PD, but without even knowing which country it comes from, I have no idea how to start evaluating this. Brianjd (talk) 04:30, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Pinging @Gameposo. Brianjd (talk) 04:36, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Esly Espinoza: Connor McLaughlin is the owner of the DuckStation repository, but many others also contributed, and I can find no indication that Connor McLaughlin is the one who created the duck logo. Brianjd (talk) 04:39, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, if this don't fit in the permission schema, delete it. Thanks. Esly Espinoza (talk) 13:09, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Takuyakoz, the uploader of most of the files, left this reply on their talk page:
- These files are Google Search, Bing, Naver on the Korean portal, and the following files, and it is confirmed that they are copyrighted. We approve the deletion of files according to copyright policy. I approve the deletion.
- I have no idea what this means, but maybe it's relevant somehow. Brianjd (talk) 11:53, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:18, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tugu Khatulistiwa
[edit]There is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia for copyrighted architectural and artistic works. Per enwiki w:The Equator monument, the reconstruction was incepted in 1938 and designed by F. Silaban, who died in 1984. Thus the monument will not be in public domain until January 1, 2055 (70+1 years after the architect's death).
- File:Equator monument.jpg
- File:Pontianak Equator Monument 2.JPG
- File:Pontianak Equator Monument.JPG
- File:The Equatorial Monument in Pontianak.jpg
- File:The top of equatorial monument Pontianak.jpg
- File:Tugu Khatulistiwa Pontianak 01.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:06, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:19, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:39, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:19, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:48, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:19, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:56, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:19, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:58, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:19, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:00, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:19, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:01, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:02, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:02, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Photo copyright belongs to the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (https://twitter.com/mfa_russia/status/1276586616992260097) Vaishakh1234 (talk) 08:04, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:05, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:06, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:19, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:20, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:20, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:23, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork, no permission Sahaib3005 (talk) 08:27, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork. No evidence of permission. Sahaib3005 (talk) 08:28, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork. No evidence of permission. Sahaib3005 (talk) 08:29, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork. No evidence of permission. Sahaib3005 (talk) 08:31, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- This work is captured from our crew photographer of the World Bodypainting Festival. Its our very own image and in the World Bodypainting Festival we have written permission of every artist/model/phtographer to use the image for any promotions related to the World Bodypainting Festival. Our Organisation of the festival is working since 25 years. Alexwbf (talk) 08:48, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
empty, useless Palauenc05 (talk) 09:42, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own-work claim: small size, missing EXIF, user upload history 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused atm receipt with no indication of importance. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 11:07, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
no authorization from the author - example of utilisation before the upload [5] tyseria (d) 11:17, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
no authorization from the author - example of utilisation before the upload [6] tyseria (d) 11:23, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE personal photograph; appears to be a reupload of Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Cristia hb. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:29, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:22, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE personal photographs.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:34, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:22, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
This file is in violation of copyrights. The uploader does not own the rights to the file. Fishandchips525 (talk) 11:40, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- I took this photo myself in 2016, along with several others at an enormous party where I met Marquardt. That is why I uploaded it as my own work, and I believe I have the rights to it. If you doubt me, I have uploaded another photo of Marquardt taken at the same party. HouseOfChange (talk) 18:28, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- This undefended deletion request has been here for more than two weeks. The only reason for it to be filed is that Fishandchips525 had his own photo of Marquardt deleted over a permissions issue. Could Brianjd or someone please close this discussion as keep? Thanks! HouseOfChange (talk) 04:43, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep @Fishandchips525 Decent resolution; full metadata; zero hits on TinEye; zero evidence of copyright violation. Brianjd (talk) 05:55, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 19:22, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
violation of copyright 80.242.119.243 22:18, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: Apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:07, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Random signature with no educational value; file name is a latinized form of "подпись", just meaning "signature" in Russian. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:47, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: No educational value - out of scope - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yehia0nline (talk · contribs)
[edit]Website screenshots with no evidence of permission and no specific educational value.
- File:Embed page.png
- File:Story status.png
- File:Search autocomplete.png
- File:Run code python online.png
- File:Search python.png
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:50, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Wrong color combinations/ Original version is File:Flag of the Centrocaspian Dictatorship.svg Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 12:02, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope, fake colors, etc, unused image - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Wrong color combinations and there are not any black stripes on flag Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 12:03, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Wrong color original one is File:Baku sovnarkom.png Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 12:03, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:06, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:07, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo with no indication of use or importance. Malcolma (talk) 12:08, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Have better version File:Mihranides coat.png Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 12:09, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Have better version File:Mihranides coat.png Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 12:09, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused and illegible. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 12:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:11, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:25, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Have better and original version File:Flag of Talysh-Mugan Autonomous Republic (the talysh national flag).jpg Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 12:11, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Fake flag - per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:25, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Have better and original version File:Flag of Talysh-Mugan Autonomous Republic (the talysh national flag).jpg Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 12:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Weird fake flag versino of the original - per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:25, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Have better and original version File:Flag of Talysh-Mugan Autonomous Republic (the talysh national flag).jpg Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 12:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:25, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:25, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:19, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:26, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Uploaded as "Own work", but titled "by Steve Pyke". Lacking evidence of the photographer's permission. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:25, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- photographer has granted full permission for use for any purpose 212.8.98.141 17:35, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Then have them send authorization to release under free license as detailed at COM:VRT -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:40, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:26, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
No exif, found on the web incl https://wyborcza.pl/7,75410,26547229,jestem-jedynym-gejem-na-wsi-jak-sie-dowiedza-to-mnie-zabija.html?disableRedirects=true - think we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 12:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:26, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:26, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:27, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:26, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. Timtrent (talk) 12:28, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:26, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Painter is not yet dead. For the other paintings in Category:Rut Hanselmann there is a VRT ticket, id=2014010410006495, but not for this painting. Does this VRT ticket apply to this painting as well? Otherwise the uploader Nogron should obtain a new pemission for this one or the file should be deleted.. JopkeB (talk) 12:30, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:26, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:31, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eemrecakmak (talk · contribs)
[edit]Two are taken with a hasselbad and credit to Author grenfo - unlikely to be own work. The other has no exif at all. Unlikely to be own work as claimed
- File:Yunus Çakmak (Kahve Uzmanı).jpg
- File:Yunus Çakmak (Kahve Uzmanı) 2.jpg
- File:Kahve Uzmanı Yunus Çakmak.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. No FOP in USA for sculptures. JopkeB (talk) 12:35, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Credited to FB, found here https://twitter.com/kainatimtiaz16/status/1208039940891824128 in 2019, before upload. Unlikely to be own work. Needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:36, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Nothing to see, just a white photo, nothing else. JopkeB (talk) 12:38, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: File is in use - not sure if that's how it supposed to look, but, it's in use on a User page. FEel free to reach out to them to discuss and renominate if you wish. --Missvain (talk) 19:28, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Likely copyrightvio at source as files seem to be in use much much before the upload date there (example at another website). Also, the file itself is a SEO promotion/advertisment. BRP ever 12:40, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- BRPever, read this >> Commons:500px licensing data, thank you.-- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 00:53, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Rodrigo.Argenton Thanks for the link. I understand the situation in which it was imported :) Since the file that was originally at 500px was likely copyright violation, do you agree with deleting this one? I wasn't sure at the start as the file seem to have been imported by one of the experienced community members, so the linked page really helps me understand the situation. Thanks.-BRP ever 01:19, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: The authorship information is obviously wrong. That 500px upload by Wayne Morgan is promotional material by a SEO company with a stock image. Highly unlikely for that person to be the author. The image could be, indeed, CC0, but it's hard to know for sure. It dates from at least 2017 [7] and is available as free for commercial use in some image banks. Although I couldn't find the original source reliably. MarioGom (talk) 11:46, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:28, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Billionairerecordsmusicgroup (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotion of another famous rapper. No contribs to any wm project. Inappropriate promotional user name.
- File:Lass V on the set of James White.jpg
- File:Lass V.jpg
- File:Lass V Gltichin Photoshoot.jpg
- File:Lass V Backstage.jpg
- File:Lass V FD Photography.jpg
Achim55 (talk) 12:57, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:28, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused small diagram without meaningful explanantion. Malcolma (talk) 12:57, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:29, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:30, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:34, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:37, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:38, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Obvious promotional picture of unknown origin Hiro (talk) 13:58, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused JPEG with SVG version available. Leonel Sohns 14:17, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
The original video was significantly longer. There was an error while uploading. The video is of no use in this form and should be deleted. Geoprofi Lars (talk) 14:19, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uploader - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chimuyears (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused images, out of scope.
Leonel Sohns 14:32, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
No "selfie"by Tjarko van der Pol (TVDP) but no permission by the author to be found in the metadata - Studio 2 Media/Gwendelyn Luijk Hoyanova (talk) 14:34, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Hoyanova This picture is royalty free and available for commercial use. If needed I can share the invoice? TNVDP (talk) 14:43, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
The plaque says its text was authored in 2001 (13th year of Heisei era). Not in PD and thus possible violation of literary copyright. Yasu (talk) 15:04, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:31, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Photo was taken in a legally not impeccable situation Amrei-Marie 21:41, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - where or how the photo was taken does not affect its copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:08, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Amrei-Marie as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: personality rights Yann (talk) 15:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tom Kummer 2019.jpg, User talk:Amrei-Marie#File:Tom Kummer 2019.jpg. Brianjd (talk) 06:08, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting as a courtesy. Yes, this image is in use on one article page, but, per the comment left by the subject: "This picture was taken at a place, where the Author wasn't aware, she was fotographed. It wasn't a public place." Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Korial Modrid96 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted (Getty Image) - https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/cardinal-turcotte-gives-back-order-of-canada-1.748750 Hyméros --}-≽ ♥ Yes ? 15:35, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Copyvio. -- Asclepias (talk) 02:39, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Still there... not so speedy ;-D Hyméros --}-≽ ♥ Yes ? 23:22, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Parce qu'en tant que proposant tu as choisi la procédure ordinaire et le commentaire de speedy n'est qu'une suggestion. -- Asclepias (talk) 02:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Maxi gunawan.jpg
- File:Kartikadjoemadi2.jpg
- File:Rahayu layang.jpg
- File:Blusukan rahayu saraswati.jpg
- File:Rahayu deklarasi psi giring azmi.jpg
- File:Rahayu Saraswati Deklarasi PSI hariadhi.jpg
- File:Rahayu saraswati hariadhi.jpg
- File:Rahayu saraswati JWN.jpg
- File:Rahayu saraswati menyeduh kopi.jpg
- File:Rahayu-saraswati-kopi.jpg
- File:Rahayu-saraswati-bicara.jpg
- File:Tertawa rahayu saraswati.jpg
- File:Rahayu saraswati bicara.jpg
- File:Rahayu saraswati 1.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- I made the pics and most of them from my smartphone. I have no idea why my smartphone did not add exif to the photo. You can try to google image again and find that the photos sourced to Wikimedia Commons or my social media accounts. Please reconsider again your judgement, thank you. Hariadhi (talk) 16:43, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Assuming good faith in case presented by User:Hariadhi. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 19:34, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Ak203 india.jpg
- File:BM21 Indian Army.jpg
- File:CL 70 Mat Ground Surfacing.jpg
- File:Swaraj Mazda T3500.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:34, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FruitVegetablesEUROPE (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo and diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Peterpaulchase (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from mascot.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:15, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Bottom right water mark (Naver) suggests this is not the user's own work. Hanyangprofessor2 (talk) 16:16, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:18, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
The thumbnail size strongly suggests this is not the "own work" of the uploader. Hanyangprofessor2 (talk) 16:18, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:19, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
The picture is close to century-old, yet claimed by uploader as "own work". 99.99% copyvio. Hanyangprofessor2 (talk) 16:19, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:20, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
No metadata. Unlike to be the uploader's own work, much more likely to be a copyvio. Hanyangprofessor2 (talk) 16:21, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
No metadata. Unlike to be the uploader's own work, much more likely to be a copyvio. Hanyangprofessor2 (talk) 16:21, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:21, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Thumbnail size strongly suggests this is not uploader's own work, but a copyvio. Hanyangprofessor2 (talk) 16:22, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:23, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot of Wikipedia's talk page used on a talk page. Out of scope, no longer has any value. Hanyangprofessor2 (talk) 16:23, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:24, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
No evidence the underlying piece of art is freely licenced or in public domain. Hanyangprofessor2 (talk) 16:28, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:32, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays! --Missvain (talk) 19:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:32, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:45, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:45, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:35, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:45, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Personal essay, plain text, out of project scope. Achim55 (talk) 16:35, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:45, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Kazakhstan Каракорум (talk) 16:56, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope; might be copyright, as this is fan art of a character from the game "Genshin Impact" Etoza (talk) 17:52, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
File was accidentally uploaded by me as part of the already deleted article https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sportwerft, which unintendedly did not comply with the Wikipedia guidelines. This image is protected by DPMA brand registration, therefore does not comply with the CC BY-SA 4.0 and needs to be removed from Wikimedia. Thank you and please apologise for causing this effort due to lack of experience. Stay healthy & all the best! Watersportwizard 79.216.40.57 17:53, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Images by Wilhelm Pietzsch
[edit]- File:1925 Wilhelm Pietzsch Fotografie Stellwegseiche Fabrik Nordcement Norddeutsche Portland-Cementfabrik Misburg Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum Hannover.jpg
- File:1933 Wilhelm Pietzsch Fotografie Ausbeutung des Waldes Mann holt Farne, Agfa, Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum Hannover.jpg
- File:1934 Wilhelm Pietzsch Fotografie Direktor Max Hugo Weigold Provinzialmuseum Hannover Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum Hannover.jpg
- File:1934-08 Wilhelm Pietzsch und Friedrich Hamm Fotografie Feld mit Erdölbohrtürmen bei Nienhagen Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum Hannover.jpg
- File:1936 Wilhelm Pietzsch Fotografie Glasplatte Sandgrube in Grundmoräne Seelberg Misburg Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum Hannover.jpg
and any additional files in Category:Wilhelm Pietzsch.
All images are unfree until 2027: de:Wilhelm Pietzch died in 1946. The (transfered) license given by the Niedersächsischen Landesmuseums Hannover is wrong. --Jergen (talk) 18:39, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nein. Der Löschantragsteller behauptet die Unwahrheit. Bei jedem der hochgeladenen Bilder habe ich jeweils einen Link zum Ort des ursprünglichen Digitalisates beigefügt; bei jedem Bild dort ist als Rechteinhaber der „Rechteinhaber: Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum Hannover“ angegeben sowie die „Lizenz Namensnennung 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)“. Alle Bedingungen habe ich beim Hochladen korrekt erfüllt. Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 19:50, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- I must stand corrected. The images are free of copyright and in the public domain since Pietzsch died in 1946 which was more than 70 years go. But the licensing with CC-by-4.0 is a clear case of copyfraud by the Museum. License should be changed to PD. --Jergen (talk) 11:09, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- Das Museum hat die Bilder online-gestellt mit dem Hinweis „Rechteinhaber: Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum Hannover“, siehe bitte die Links bei den Bildern. Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 15:04, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Licensing situation was sorted out. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 19:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
File:1930er Jahre circa Max Hugo Weigold Fotografie Forsthaus Misburg Rolf Dahlgrün, Dr. Dahlgrün, Ernst Schaefer, Förster Ernst Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum Hannover.jpg
[edit]as well:
- File:1930er Jahre circa Max Hugo Weigold Fotografie Kaninchenjagd mit Frettchen im Misburger Staatsforst Dr. Dahlgrün, Förster Ernst, Ernst Schaefer, Rolf Dahlgrün Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum Hannover.jpg
- File:1935 Max Hugo Weigold Fotografie alte Weide am Eishaus (in Abbruch) Aushöhlung fürs Museum, Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum Hannover.jpg
- File:1935 Max Hugo Weigold Fotografie riesige Weide am alten Eishaus am Altenbekener Damm Maschsee Bismarckschule.jpg
Unfree until 2044; de:Hugo Weingold died in 1973. Jergen (talk) 18:43, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nein. Jergen's Löschbegründung verbreitet die Unwahrheit. Tatsache ist die über den von mir beim Foto gegebenen Link nachzulesende Lizenz Namensnennung 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 18:53, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- German laws apply, not some copyfraud-license by a Museum. --Jergen (talk) 11:11, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nein. Jergen verbreitet die Unwahrheit. Tatsache ist: „Rechteinhaber: Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum Hannover“, siehe hier. Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 13:56, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- Es hilft nichts, mich der Lüge zu bezichtigen. Die de:Schutzrechtsberühmung für Digitalisate durch das Museum ist klassischer Copyfraud. Dein Einwurf zeigt nur, dass du zukünftig besser keine Bilder mehr hochladen solltest. --Jergen (talk) 16:55, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nein. Jergen verbreitet die Unwahrheit. Tatsache ist: „Rechteinhaber: Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum Hannover“, siehe hier. Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 13:56, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- German laws apply, not some copyfraud-license by a Museum. --Jergen (talk) 11:11, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Na, wenigsten zeigt dieser Mann endlich mal seine wahren Absichten. Seit rund 12 Jahren nur Hinterherstellungen, Negativ-Kommentare, Diskreditierungen und Verdächtigungen gegen meine Person. In der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia wurde er vor Jahren von einem Administrator aufgefordert, mich persönlich von seiner Beobachtungsliste zu nehmen. Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 00:19, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Whether you like it or not - I agree with the uploader. The museum owns the rights to these photos and can do what they wish. It would state otherwise (i.e. if the photographers estate still owned the images). This is my final decision. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 19:51, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
please delete file:Eloisa vernissage2.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 167.62.228.169 (talk) 15:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. I am the author of the picture, know the photographed lady in person, and she kindly asked me to remove it. Please, proceed. --Fadesga (talk) 18:40, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- I'm the photographed lady herself, and ask please to delete this picture. A recent one has been released by the photographer to use it in the articles relative to my person. Thank you. --Elulene (talk) 16:28, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:51, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Not uploaders work nor is it creative commons. (Pressphoto taken by Marius Gulliksrud) JonasTisell (talk) 19:31, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:51, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork as it was taken from an advertisement Sahaib3005 (talk) 20:00, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:51, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Kerine ausreichende und ordentliche Lizenzierung Lutheraner (talk) 20:27, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:52, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
not sure what this photo is supposed to represent - out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:52, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:09, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:52, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Trailrunningsweden (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work. One image by Alexander Neimert, another one by Nisse Schmidt.
Didym (talk) 22:09, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:52, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:14, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:52, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:15, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:52, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
This seems like licence laundering by the Flickr account. The design of the original award is copyrightable and non-free, so they cannot publish a derivative photo without permission. De728631 (talk) 22:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:52, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Redundant against File:Infinity Ward.svg, which is of higher quality and has the correct shade of red. IceWelder [✉] 22:41, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:53, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
This picture seems to be copied as it appears in several places on the web and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 23:17, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:53, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
The source website does not apper to actually be the source of this image. Additionally, there is no evidence that the uploader is the true copyright holder. Mhawk10 (talk) 23:22, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:53, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PedroRibeiroMG (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works: many images with FB or transmission code, scans, and screengrabs from Google Streetview (just compare File:Divisa entre Justinópolis e Venda Nova.png with this). Some historical images missing essential info (original author, source, date, and permission). Unreliable uploader.
- File:Marquinhos Santos.jpg
- File:Eu Amo Neves.jpg
- File:Escola Municipal Liliane Marchezane Gomes.png
- File:Junynho martins.jpg
- File:Divisa entre Justinópolis e Venda Nova.png
- File:Alisson Ferreira de Oliveira.jpg
- File:Praça do Bairro Botafogo.png
- File:Carros da Guarda Municipal de Ribeirão das Neves.jpg
- File:Antônio Carlos Ribeiro de Andrada (IV).jpg
- File:Paróquia Nossa Senhora da Piedade.png
File:Brasaoneves1.png- File:Hospital Municipal de Ribeirão das Neves.png
- File:Penitenciária Agrícola de Neves (Ribeirão das Neves, MG).jpg
- File:Escola Municipal Alice Maria Smeria.png
- File:Avenida Dionísio Gomes.png
- File:Entrada do Veneza.png
File:Regional Veneza.png- File:Propriedade agrícola.png
- File:Ônibus 5376.png
- File:Bairro Cruzeiro.png
- File:IFMG Neves.jpg
- File:Terminal Justinopolis 2.png
- File:521C move metropolitano.jpg
- File:Terminal Justinopolis improvisado.jpg
- File:Terminal Justinopolis.png
- File:Ernst Günther Schenck.jpg
- File:UPA Justinópolis.jpg
- File:Ribeirão das Neves 1983.jpg
File:Distrito de Justinópolis.png- File:SIT Neves.jpg
- File:Ribeirão das Neves,1985.jpg
- File:Parque da Lajinha2.jpg
- File:Praça do bairro Jardim São Judas Tadeu.png
- File:Justinópolis, Praça da Matriz.jpg
- File:Vista aérea do parque.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:44, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Images:
- File:Antônio Carlos Ribeiro de Andrada (IV).jpg: This photo belongs to the Minas Gerais public archive. That is, public content, being linked to public personalities. Sale is prohibited, but disclosure for educational purposes is not. Link 1
- File:Penitenciária Agrícola de Neves (Ribeirão das Neves, MG).jpg: IBGE is a federal institution (produce public data) in Brazil and its data/images are public (Sale is prohibited ). Link 2
- File:Ribeirão das Neves 1983.jpg: Same case as the previous photo.
- File:Junynho martins.jpg: Photo of the city mayor, cited source (TSE -Brazilian Election Justice- public data)
- File:Brasaoneves1.png: Seal of Ribeirão das Neves, without background. Brasaoneves.png is the original.
- File:Regional Veneza.png: This satellite image was taken from QGIS open source software. The original source and changes are written in the lower right corner. Link 3
- File:Distrito de Justinópolis.png: Same case as the previous photo.
- Link 1: Minas Gerais public archive (Portuguese) /Link 2: IBGE (Portuguese) /Link 3: QGIS
- Pedro Ribeiro (talk) 19:17, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- For bullets 1 to 3 above: "Public content" is not the same as free content. "Sale is prohibited" = non-commercial license, which is not compatible with Commons licensing. Moreover, Link 1 and 2 above are not legal statements or licenses. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:58, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- File:Junynho martins.jpg was not found at the provided links (www.ribeiraodasneves.mg.gov.br, nor divulgacandcontas.tse.jus.br). Moreover, neither websites has any compatible license.
- No evidence provided that File:Brasaoneves1.png has a free license. Again, www.ribeiraodasneves.mg.gov.br has no compatible license.
- I have struck the maps from this DR.
- I suggest that you get more familiar with licensing before you upload again. Please read COM:L/pt-br. Thanks. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:58, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- I changed the licensing of the following images, if you can check...
- Finally, it was not my intention to cause any problems for Wikimedia. I will read your recommendations. Pedro Ribeiro (talk) 21:36, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Ping User:P199 - Please take a gander here and strike anything from the nomination, if needed. Thanks. Missvain (talk) 19:46, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Missvain: I struck File:Brasaoneves1.png because as a COA, it might be
{{PD-BrazilGov}}
. But there is no evidence that the other 2 files would qualify for this license. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:53, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Missvain: I struck File:Brasaoneves1.png because as a COA, it might be
- Ping User:P199 - Please take a gander here and strike anything from the nomination, if needed. Thanks. Missvain (talk) 19:46, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 21:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Prominently features copyrighted 1993 game w:Zool 2. Given the other imags in the Category:Atari Jaguar, it doesn't seem like cropping the image to show only the console would be worth it. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:06, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- The screen has been censored. --Kigsz (talk) 07:01, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as per Kigsz - there is no copyright violation here. Are you looking at a previous version of the image, even though this was censored in September 2020 - 14 months ago? Chaheel Riens (talk) 21:32, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, I assumed this was the original look of the game. Still not fully sure whether the current version is below TOO, though. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 22:00, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as per Kigsz - there is no copyright violation here. Are you looking at a previous version of the image, even though this was censored in September 2020 - 14 months ago? Chaheel Riens (talk) 21:32, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted The "censored" version just made the screen somewhat more pixilated; game still recognizable and key part of image. COM:DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:07, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Have better version File:Flag of Talysh-Mugan Autonomous Republic (the talysh national flag).jpg Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 12:11, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept in use -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:54, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Have better version File:Flag of Talysh-Mugan Autonomous Republic (the talysh national flag).jpg Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 22:07, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:04, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_the_Lezgi_people.png Sharval (talk) 01:10, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of the Lezgi people.png -- Geagea (talk) 05:35, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
This is not Lezgi people flag. This is flag of organization "SADVAL" in 1990-1995 years. ALDKL (talk) 18:41, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of the Lezgi people.png -- Geagea (talk) 20:46, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
This is no flag of Lezgi people. Ordinem (talk) 19:11, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 18:12, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Have better version File:Lezgin flag.png Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 12:19, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept in use -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:51, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Have better version File:Lezgin flag.png Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 22:11, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep COM:INUSE A09090091 (talk) 18:21, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- @A09090091, it is only used in File:Lezgin flag.png, which is the exactly the same of this file. If it use not useless, then we can upload lots of duplicates and just use them in one version of it. - Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 23:04, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Dr.Wiki54: Your "better version" is not better but worser (look at the quality of file) and it was uploaded later than Lezgin flag sadval. A09090091 (talk) 12:01, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- @A09090091 it is not mine, but never mind. Yeap i agree here that i made a mistake by saying "better one". But why we should upload lots of duplicates and do not delete them. I agrre with your commemt that you wrote in other request. - Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 14:45, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Dr.Wiki54: Your "better version" is not better but worser (look at the quality of file) and it was uploaded later than Lezgin flag sadval. A09090091 (talk) 12:01, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- @A09090091, it is only used in File:Lezgin flag.png, which is the exactly the same of this file. If it use not useless, then we can upload lots of duplicates and just use them in one version of it. - Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 23:04, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 13:06, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monas
[edit]Each of these nominated images show the w:National Monument (Indonesia) in a non-de minimis manner (i.e., the monument is the main subject or the monument forms an important part, and removing it renders an image useless).
The monument was incepted in 1975, with two people involved in its design: Friedrich Silaban (died 1984) and R.M. Soedarsono (who was apparently living as of 2015, born 1933 and around 82 years old in 2015, as per this 2015 blog article about the architect) who died in 1989 (as per RaFaDa20631 below). Unfortunately, Indonesian law does not provide freedom of panorama for free commercial uses of images of such contemporary artworks by living or recently-deceased artists without the need of licensing permissions from them or their heirs of copyright holder-ship (e.g. grandchildren or estate).
The monument cannot fall under {{PD-IDGov}} as it was fulfilled through a design competition (at least according to enwiki), not by commission. A complete excerpt from enwiki article is below the list of files.
- File:2019's New Year in Jakarta, Indonesia.jpg
File:500px photo (39465468).jpegnow cropped by DarwIn JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:45, 1 December 2021 (UTC)- File:Collectie NMvWereldculturen, TM-20020665, Dia- Het Nationaal Monument (Monas) op het Merdeka-plein, Henk van Rinsum, 1980.jpg
- File:Indonesia national monument.jpg
- File:Indonesian National Mounment, Monas.JPG
- File:Jakarta Indonesia National-Monument-01.jpg
- File:Jakarta Indonesia National-Monument-02.jpg
- File:Jakarta-IMG 3495.JPG
- File:Merdeka Square Monas 02.jpg
- File:Merdeka Square Monas Front.JPG
- File:Merdeka Square Monas.JPG
- File:Monas - national monument in Jakarta.jpg
- File:Monas - panoramio.jpg
- File:Monas - pomnik narodowy w Indonezji.jpg
- File:Monas 1.jpg
- File:Monas 2.jpg
- File:Monas 2017-08-22 (4).jpg
- File:Monas at night.jpg
- File:Monas avond.JPG
- File:Monas by day.jpg
- File:Monas Construction Circa 1963.JPG
- File:Monas flags 1a.JPG
- File:Monas lit blue for 2019 Autism Day.jpg
- File:Monas nighttime.jpg
- File:Monas on Medan Merdeka Jakarta.jpg
- File:Monas perspective photography.jpg
- File:Monas saat HUT TNI ke-68.jpg
- File:Monas UpClose.JPG
- File:Monas view from Gambir Bus Terminal.JPG
- File:Monas view from Gambir station.JPG
- File:Monas.JPG
- File:MonasConstruction2.jpg
- File:Monumen Nasional - panoramio.jpg
- File:Monumen Nasional and Indonesian national flag Independence Day 2013.jpg
- File:Monumen Nasional in Jakarta.jpg
- File:Monumen Nasional Jakarta (Monas).jpg
- File:Monumen Nasional Jakarta (Tugu Monas).jpg
- File:Monumen nasional jakarta.jpg
- File:Monumen Nasional Jakarta.jpg
- File:Monumen Nasional Malam Hari - panoramio.jpg
- File:National Monument Jakarta Amelia Guo.JPG
- File:The National Monument, Jakarta, Indonesia (cropped).jpg
- File:The National Monument, Jakarta, Indonesia.jpg
- File:Tugu Monas Jakarta.jpg
- File:Tugu Monumen Nasional Jakarta.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:21, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Excerpt from enwiki article regarding its inception
|
---|
On 17 August 1954, a National Monument Committee was established and a design competition was held in 1955. This attracted 51 entries, but only one design, by Frederich Silaban, met any of the criteria determined by the committee, which included reflecting the character of Indonesia in a building capable of lasting for centuries. A repeat competition was held in 1960, but once again, none of the 136 entries met the criteria. The chairman of the jury team then asked Silaban to show his design to Sukarno. However, Sukarno did not like the design as he wanted the monument to be in the form of a linga and yoni. Silaban was asked to design such a monument, but his design was for a monument so large that it would have been unaffordable given the economic conditions at the time. Silaban refused to design a smaller monument, suggesting that construction be delayed until the Indonesian economy improved. Sukarno then asked the architect R.M. Soedarsono to continue with the design. Soedarsono incorporated the numbers 17, 8 and 45, representing the 17 August 1945 Proclamation of Indonesian Independence, in the dimensions of the monument. |
Note that some of the uploaders may not be notified due to an error during VisualFileChange use: -- NO TASK DESCR. FOR mdUploaderNotified PLEASE ADD IT -- ##### API request failed (protectedpage): This page has been protected to prevent editing or other actions. Help: You can request an edit to 'User talk:SieBot' at COM:AN (the Administrators’ noticeboard). at Sat, 27 Nov 2021 04:21:27 GMT served by mw1408. _ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Checked talk pages of all uploaders (except bots), and all have been notified. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:37, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Keep File:500px photo (39465468).jpeg as {{De minimis}}. Eventually delete the uncropped version.-- Darwin Ahoy! 18:28, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks @DarwIn: for the cropping. Agree to this uncropped version. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:44, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment In Anton Soedarsono's book (written by Soedarsono's child), he claimed that Monas is his father's work. For death date according to the book, Soedarsono was passed away on 1989. Please not to be confused with R.M. Soedarsono (former rector of ISI Yogyakarta) who was passed away 2018. RaFaDa20631 (talk) 11:44, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- @RaFaDa20631: so assuming no one will attempt to ask Soedarsono's heirs to release the work in public domain (via COM:VRT correspondence), or no one will attempt to introduce commercial FOP in Indonesia, the work will fall public domain on January 1, 2060 (70+1 years after the architect's death). Unsure if this architectural monument may fall under US restrictions (COM:URAA), which may mean 1975+95+1 years. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:04, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- Unsure since, while the author was an architect, the work he designed was a sculpture in nature. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:58, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Keep File:MonasConstruction2.jpg - image is PD as per description on page. Davidelit (talk) 04:10, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Davidelit: government's public domain license does not magically deny artist's copyright (at least in the Philippine case). Or is that a fact in Indonesia; that artists' copyrights can be overwritten by government's public domain licensing in case of government's images of their monuments or sculptures? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:43, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: Your sarcasm is unnecessary. I am simply trying to defend the Indonesia project against your relentless attacks. You are clearly determined to delete as many images as possible using your interpretation of foreign laws as justification, and you cannot blame people for fighting back. Davidelit (talk) 00:24, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Davidelit: why don't you try to ask for copyright law reforms? Like what we here in the Philippines are doing (monitoring for insertion of FOP in our copyright law)? It is very absurd to complain: the French have lost hundreds of thousands of images because of their no commercial FOP, but most of them don't complain. Unlike the Indonesian situation where around thousands were deleted, but there is no indication of an attempt to reform the exceptions/limitations to copyright law. If the Indonesian government or artists do not agree to commercial FOP, then there is nothing to do. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:35, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- I am not Indonesian and therefore cannot ask for copyright law reforms. Your interpretation of the law has resulted in less information about Indonesia being available, but it looks like you win this round. Davidelit (talk) 04:08, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Davidelit: why don't you try to ask for copyright law reforms? Like what we here in the Philippines are doing (monitoring for insertion of FOP in our copyright law)? It is very absurd to complain: the French have lost hundreds of thousands of images because of their no commercial FOP, but most of them don't complain. Unlike the Indonesian situation where around thousands were deleted, but there is no indication of an attempt to reform the exceptions/limitations to copyright law. If the Indonesian government or artists do not agree to commercial FOP, then there is nothing to do. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:35, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: Your sarcasm is unnecessary. I am simply trying to defend the Indonesia project against your relentless attacks. You are clearly determined to delete as many images as possible using your interpretation of foreign laws as justification, and you cannot blame people for fighting back. Davidelit (talk) 00:24, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Keep sebelumnya saya minta maaf karena menulis dalam bahasa indonesia, saya berpendapat foto-foto ini tidak melanggar hak cipta. Karena dalam pasal 43 (d) Undang-undang nomor 28 tahun 2014 tentang hak cipta memperbolehkan penyebaran konten asalkan non-komersial. Opini lebih lanjut dapat dilihat dalam jurnal balitbangham Empat Tilda (talk) 16:35, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Google Translate:I apologize in advance for writing in Indonesian, I think these photos do not violate copyright. Because article 43 (d) of Law number 28 of 2014 concerning copyright allows the distribution of content as long as it is non-commercial. Further opinions can be found in the journal balitbangham
- @Empat Tilda: Non-commercial licensing is prohibited on Commons = COM:Licensing. See also: 2018 statement by Creative Commons Indonesia, affirming no Commons-acceptable freedom of panorama from Indonesia. Perhaps a change/reform in copyright law will solve all things once and for all, as alluded in a suggestion on the Creative Commons Indonesia statement. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:37, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note that if Commons is going to accept non-commercial freedom of panorama rights (e.g. of Indonesia), then this will not conform to Wikimedia Commons' mission of providing media files "that are not subject to copyright restrictions which would prevent them being used by anyone, anytime, for any purpose" (ref. Commons:Licensing). The policy page adds: "Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use justifications.... Media licensed exclusively under non-commercial only licenses (like CC BY-NC-SA) are not accepted either." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:42, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Keep Extreme case of flawed interpretation of foreign law by proposer. dwadieff ✉ 01:45, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- What exactly is flawed about this interpretation? --HyperGaruda (talk) 08:26, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- @HyperGaruda: see Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:An-Nur_Great_Mosque. dwadieff ✉ 17:57, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- @David Wadie Fisher-Freberg: what I read there, is that Commons says there is no FoP, while you say the law is not conclusive on that matter, correct? Our precautionary principle comes into play in case of doubt/inconclusiveness, favouring deletion in such a case. However, Monas presents more complexity in the form of the exemption for government works, though even that exemption ({{PD-IDGov}}) is now under discussion. --HyperGaruda (talk) 08:26, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- @HyperGaruda: see Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:An-Nur_Great_Mosque. dwadieff ✉ 17:57, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Question to JWilz12345: how is submission through a design competition or via commission relevant to PD-IDGov? In either case it is executed by or on behalf of the government. --HyperGaruda (talk) 08:26, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep File:Monas lit blue for 2019 Autism Day.jpg after cropping. Delete those who fails de minimis--A1Cafel (talk) 16:14, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- @HyperGaruda: it might be, though one issue now is the designer of the current design (R.M. Soedarsono), per enwiki: "Silaban refused to design a smaller monument, suggesting that construction be delayed until the Indonesian economy improved. Sukarno then asked the architect R.M. Soedarsono to continue with the design. Soedarsono incorporated the numbers 17, 8 and 45, representing the 17 August 1945 Proclamation of Indonesian Independence, in the dimensions of the monument." So it is assumed that the current design is not of Silaban's (which emerged via a design competition), but from R.M. Soedarsono. As per RaFaDa20631 above, Soedarsono's son Anton is claiming that Monas was his father's own work. Unsure if his relationship with Sukarno constitites "on behalf of the government". JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:15, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- According to Arsonal's response further below, that relationship can indeed be interpreted as "on behalf of the government". --HyperGaruda (talk) 18:59, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- One attention: {{PD-IDGov}} is currently being discussed for deletion: Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-IDGov. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:06, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- According to Arsonal's response further below, that relationship can indeed be interpreted as "on behalf of the government". --HyperGaruda (talk) 18:59, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Question Adding to question above. Article 43 of the Law of The Republic of Indonesia Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright states that Any Publication, Distribution, Communication, and/or Reproduction executed by or on behalf of the government, unless stated to be protected by laws and regulations, a statement to such Works, or when Publication, Distribution, Communication, and/or Reproduction to such Works are made. Given that the design and construction was executed as part of a government-sponsored competition, and there is no record that the National Monument is protected by any sort of copyright regulation, how does this fail criteria for inclusion? Arsonal (talk) 02:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Arsonal You might be interested in Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2021/01#Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:An-Nur_Great_Mosque_should_be_focused_by_professors_in_this_grey_area Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:37, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for pointing me to the Village Pump conversation @Liuxinyu970226. I also referenced the FOP statement by Creative Commons Indonesia while doing my own check. I did notice, however, that the Village Pump conversation didn't address clause 43(b) for works executed on behalf of the government (which I believe the National Monument is, since Soedarsono designed it on Sukarno's request as then-President of Indonesia). CC Indonesia also takes the position that 43(b) is evaluated separately from the commercial use clause of 43(d): "Pada huruf d, disebutkan bahwa pembuatan dan penyebarluasan ciptaan secara daring, [In letter d, it is stated that the creation and dissemination of works online,] selain ciptaan yang dimaksud dalam huruf b, dapat dilaksanakan, [other than the works referred to in letter b, can be carried out,] bahkan dalam kepentingan komersial atau disediakan untuk digunakan kembali dalam kepentingan komersial secara langsung asal pihak pencipta atau pemegang hak cipta tidak keberatan terhadap hal tersebut. [even for commercial purposes or provided for direct commercial use as long as the creator or copyright holder does not object to this.]" Arsonal (talk) 16:42, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Comment Well, this just took an unexpected turn. --HyperGaruda (talk) 18:59, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: 1) the monument has been built by commission of the Indonesian Government (even the design competition was made by the Government), and 2) per Arsonal, State owned works are free to reproduce. Ruthven (msg) 09:25, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vincencij46 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Pogačnik died in 1971, designs are thus still copyrightable per {{PD-Slovenia}}. File:5.Čestitka.jpg is also OOS. Family photo and personal photo copyright is unclear.
- File:5.Čestitka.jpg
- File:Cimean - Za zdrave zobe, zgibanka zobne kreme, 1939.jpg
- File:Cimean - Toaletna voda.jpg
- File:Cimean - Kopalne tablete.jpg
- File:Cimean - Kozmetični izdelki.jpg
- File:Cimean - Kopalna tableta.jpg
- File:Znak Cimean.jpg
- File:03.V Vedrogu, 1967.jpg
- File:02.Vodikov peroksid.jpg
- File:01.Dedi Metod.jpg - {{PD-Slovenia}}
- File:Firma Cimean Metod Pogačnik.jpg - {{PD-text}}
A09090091 (talk) 11:42, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Zakaj so vse slike označene za brisanje, ko pa so bile za vse slike poslane izjave/dovoljenja za njihovo uporabo s strani lastnice teh slik - Helene Pogačnik Grobelšek, hčerke Metoda Pogačnika, ki je podedovala vse tole in gre za družinski arhiv. Vse je bilo poslano po navodili, na navedeni mail v navodilih, in sicer na isti dan, kot so bile slike tudi ponovno naložene v članek. Prav tako sem poslal tudi mail na navedeni naslov za informacije, kjer sem obvestil oz. spraševal kakšno je stanje glede slik, a nisem še dobil nobenega odgovora. --Vincencij46 (talk) 00:24, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- Mimogrede, Helena Pogačnik Grobelšek je hkrati tudi žena avtorja članka, Francija Grobelška. To nisem jaz, jaz samo urejam zadeve v njegovem imenu, ker se ne spozna toliko na računalniške zadeve. Ampak uporabniški račun je njegov, jaz imam samo dostop in dovoljenje, da urejam vse. --Vincencij46 (talk) 00:26, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- Tule je primer izjave za eno sliko (narejeno po navodilih tukaj - https://sl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedija:Dokazilo_o_dovoljenju_za_objavo) - enaka izjava je bila poslana za vse slike, ki so navedene zgoraj:
- Na tem mestu izjavljam, da sem jaz, Helena Pogačnik Grobelšek (hčerka Metoda Pogačnika in žena avtorja članka Francija Grobelška), imetnica avtorskih pravic za sliko 01.Dedi Metod.jpg na https://sl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metod_Pogačnik.
- Strinjam se z objavo dela pod prosto licenco "Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Deljenje pod enakimi pogoji 4.0 Mednarodna.
- Zavedam se, da pod pogoji licence in upoštevanja vseh drugih relevantnih zakonov vsakomur dajem pravico do uporabe dela tudi v pridobitni namen in do njegovega spreminjanja v skladu s svojimi potrebami.
- Zavedam se, da to privoljenje ni omejeno le na Wikipedijo ali njena sorodna spletišča, ter se lahko pod enakimi pogoji uporablja tudi zunaj Wikipedije in njenih sorodnih spletišč.
- Zavedam se, da kljub temu obdržim avtorske pravice in pravico do navedbe mojega avtorstva v skladu z izbrano licenco. Spremembe, ki jih bodo na delu napravili drugi, ne bodo pripisane meni.
- Zavedam se, da se prosta licenca nanaša samo na avtorske pravice in si pridržujem pravico ukrepanja proti vsakomur, ki bi to delo uporabil na žaljiv način ali bi z njegovo uporabo kršil pravice osebnosti, pravice na blagovni znamki itd.
- Zavedam se, da tega privoljenja ne morem preklicati in da se delo lahko stalno hrani v katerem od projektov Wikimedije ali pa tudi izbriše iz njega.
- Helena Pogačnik Grobelšek
- Imetnica avtorskih pravic
- 27.11.2021 Vincencij46 (talk) 00:29, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- Mail poslan na info-sl@wikimedia.org, naslednji dan, kot so bile naložene slike in poslane izjave, še vedno brez odziva. Je kakšna možnost, da se kje končno dobi kakšen konkreten odgovor kako in kaj? Ne pa da se takoj označi za brisanje, brez kakršnekoli povratne informacije. Nepreglednost tukaj je naravnost zastrašujoča, ne vem kako se sploh kdo znajde.
- Pozdravljeni,
- imam vprašanje glede članka o Metodu Pogačniku:
- https://sl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metod_Pogačnik
- Situacija je sledeča: jaz nisem avtor članka, ampak zadevo samo urejam v imenu gospoda, ki je avtor članka, ker se pač ne spozna in mu urejam te zadeve. Njegovo uporabniško ime je Vincencij46 (francigro@gmail.com). Ko zadeve urejam, sem prijavljen z njegovim uporabniškim računom.
- Skratka - članek je bil naložen že kar nekaj časa nazaj, dodane so bile slike. Ker niso bila ustrezno urejena dovoljenja za tiste slike, jih je bila večina izbrisanih, razumljivo. Oba sva namreč pozabila na to.
- Ampak včeraj dopoldne sem jih pa ponovno naložil in namen je bil, da zvečer pošljeva še vsa ustrezna dovoljenja (kar sva tudi storila). Držala sva se navodil na tej strani:
- https://sl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedija:Dokazilo_o_dovoljenju_za_objavo
- Ampak še preden sva poslal ta navodila, so bile slike že odstranjene iz članka. Zakaj?
- Prav tako me zanima, zakaj je bil odstranjen del, ko sem za "Tehniške visoke šole Berlin-Charllotenburg" dodal, da se zdaj imenuje Techical University Berlin, ker se pač zdaj drugače imenuje. V čem je tu problem? Dodana je bila tudi povezava na spletno stran, prav tako odstranjena.
- Če že nekdo, ki ni avtor članka, nekaj spreminja, bi pričakoval vsaj, da se navede razlog. Za slike že lahko sklepam, zakaj so odstranjene, čeprav ne vem zakaj tako hitro, ampak za cel kup sprememb pa ni bilo navedenega razloga.
- Pa še dobro, da sem našel tale mail, ker najti na sami strani način, da se lahko koga kaj vpraša, je tudi podvig zase. Nepregledno, da je joj. Ampak to je zgolj moje mnenje. Pa tudi navodila za marsikaj niso ravno jasna, npr. glede teh dovoljenj in licenc.. pa sem računalniško pismen, računalničar po izobrazbi, pa mi marsikaj ni jasno, tako da sploh ne vem, če sva vse v redu naredila glede teh obrazcev.
- LP,
- Kristjan Vincencij46 (talk) 00:32, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- Zdaj pa čakam in upam, da končno tudi dočakam kakšen odgovor in/ali koristno informacijo. Hvala. Vincencij46 (talk) 00:34, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Vincencij46: Kot je @Yerpo že dejal, je dovoljenje v obdelavi. Predlagm, da si prebereš tudi kaj pravi ZASP o javni lasti na {{PD-Slovenia}}. Avtorsko sporne slike se odstranjujejo srednje hitro, saj slike v člankih ponavadi pritegnejo bralca k branju (so zelo vidne), zato je možna kršitev avtorskih pravic (AP) lahko problem. V najhujšem primeru bi lahko lastnik AP tožil Wikipedijo. Link na tehniško univerzo je bil pa odstranjen, ker je bila zunanja povezava. Te so v članku med besedilom nezaželene, relevantne se navede na dnu članka; vendar ta po mojem mnenju nima tolikšnega pomena, da bi jo lahko dodal. Sam žal maila ne morem odobriti, saj nisem član OTRS.
- Comment for AN: Please do not close until OTRS procedure is finished. A09090091 (talk) 18:18, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Comment as a VRT (ex ORTS) agent, I confirm these files are the subject of Template:OTRS ticket. The situation is not clarified yet, I will update when I get additional information from the people involved. — Yerpo Eh? 18:48, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Yerpo: Any update yet? --Rosenzweig τ 22:05, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: Sorry, I forgot about this issue for a bit. It's a bit complicated, because the uploader doesn't have direct proof of copyright ownership, but we got permission by the heir of the company's owner who commissioned the artwork. Do you think that would be sufficient to cover all the bases? To my assessment, it would. — Yerpo Eh? 19:58, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- Did the commission include complete usage rights? By which mean, is the commissioner actually allowed to put the works under a free license? And are the photographs included in the permission as well? --Rosenzweig τ 20:22, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: Sorry, I forgot about this issue for a bit. It's a bit complicated, because the uploader doesn't have direct proof of copyright ownership, but we got permission by the heir of the company's owner who commissioned the artwork. Do you think that would be sufficient to cover all the bases? To my assessment, it would. — Yerpo Eh? 19:58, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: : As I said, I don't have direct proof of what the commission entailed, but all the parties we have contact with are reasonably sure they own sufficient copyright. It's a slightly gray area, but I believe the precautionary principle is met to a sufficient degree (if not fully), and we can accept this. The photographs will be labeled separately, they are simple works for which copyright has lapsed already. — Yerpo Eh? 06:44, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- It's your call then, go ahead and make your decision :-) --Rosenzweig τ 07:27, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
@Yerpo: I'd like to close this deletion request soon. Still waiting on input from you. --Rosenzweig τ 21:58, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: sorry for the delay. I okayed the uploader's explanation, but I asked for the original permission because what they sent was a forwarded text from the copyright owner. There was no reply to this since, so you can delete the files and I'll ask for undeletion if/when the reply arrives. I suggest keeping the portrait according to {{PD-Slovenia}} (eventhough I'm not entirely certain that the photo was published before) and the last file with simple text which I believe falls under {{PD-text}}. — Yerpo Eh? 06:30, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: most of them, per discussion. I kept one as {{PD-text}} and one as {{PD-Slovenia}}, though I'm not entirely sure it was published before 1970. --Rosenzweig τ 16:03, 9 May 2022 (UTC)