Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/01/25
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![78 File:Транспортно-пересадочный узел "Нагатинская".jpg](#File:Транспортно-пересадочный_узел_"Нагатинская".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_of_Tarenui-jinja_shrine_(Miho_village,_Ibaraki_Pref.).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
-VOA.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
copyvio AT (talk) 06:51, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination.No free licence at the source page, so speedy deletion is applicable. --De728631 (talk) 07:10, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
copyvio AT (talk) 06:53, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No free licence at the source page, so speedy deletion is applicable. --De728631 (talk) 07:01, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Photo of a slide at a conference, the slide is prominent in the image and not freely-licensed. It was my mistake for uploading Victorgrigas (talk) 02:00, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:40, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Photo of a slide at a conference, the slide is prominent in the image and not freely-licensed. It was my mistake for uploading Victorgrigas (talk) 02:02, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:53, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Photo of a slide at a conference, the slide is prominent in the image and not freely-licensed. It was my mistake for uploading Victorgrigas (talk) 02:03, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:50, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Photo of a slide at a conference, the slide is prominent in the image and not freely-licensed. It was my mistake for uploading Victorgrigas (talk) 02:07, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:51, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Photo of a slide at a conference, the slide is prominent in the image and not freely-licensed. It was my mistake for uploading Victorgrigas (talk) 02:07, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:52, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Photo of a slide at a conference, the slide is prominent in the image and not freely-licensed. It was my mistake for uploading Victorgrigas (talk) 02:08, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:47, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Photo of a slide at a conference, the slide is prominent in the image and not freely-licensed. It was my mistake for uploading Victorgrigas (talk) 02:08, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:48, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Photo of a slide at a conference, the slide is prominent in the image and not freely-licensed. It was my mistake for uploading Victorgrigas (talk) 02:09, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:49, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Photo of a slide at a conference, the slide is prominent in the image and not freely-licensed. It was my mistake for uploading Victorgrigas (talk) 02:09, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:41, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Photo of a slide at a conference, the slide is prominent in the image and not freely-licensed. It was my mistake for uploading Victorgrigas (talk) 02:09, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:43, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Photo of a slide at a conference, the slide is prominent in the image and not freely-licensed. It was my mistake for uploading Victorgrigas (talk) 02:09, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:44, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Photo of a slide at a conference, the slide is prominent in the image and not freely-licensed. It was my mistake for uploading Victorgrigas (talk) 02:09, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:42, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Photo of a slide at a conference, the slide is prominent in the image and not freely-licensed. It was my mistake for uploading Victorgrigas (talk) 02:09, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:45, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Photo of a slide at a conference, the slide is prominent in the image and not freely-licensed. It was my mistake for uploading Victorgrigas (talk) 02:09, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:46, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Photo of a slide at a conference, the slide is prominent in the image and not freely-licensed. It was my mistake for uploading Victorgrigas (talk) 02:09, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 13:37, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Photo of a slide at a conference, the slide is prominent in the image and not freely-licensed. It was my mistake for uploading Victorgrigas (talk) 02:09, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:38, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Photo of a slide at a conference, the slide is prominent in the image and not freely-licensed. It was my mistake for uploading Victorgrigas (talk) 02:09, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:39, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
es antiguo Axel1834 (talk) 06:22, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request on day of upload. --Achim (talk) 09:38, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Because it is Other Tomrom2122 (talk) 14:01, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:07, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Because it is Other 176.108.5.65 23:05, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. COM:FU. --Regasterios (talk) 17:40, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Brazil copyright law states that a work is PD 70 years from disclosure. No disclosure date for this photograph is given so it may still be under copyright. And even if it were published immediately after being taken, it would not meet the requirements of {{PD-Brazil-URAA}}. Buidhe (talk) 15:20, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Keep As stated in {{PD-Brazil-URAA}}, along with the jurisprudence that supports that, "photographic works not considered to be "artistic creations" produced before 1 January 1996. (Includes documentary photography in general (commercial or not), as well as non-artistic photographic portraits." . This is a common, non-studio photograph, and it was obviously produced before 1 jan. 1996, therefore it never had any copyright according to the pre-1998 Brazilian copyright law, which is the one that applies here (not the "PD 70" thing, that is only for post-1997 works).-- Darwin Ahoy! 21:58, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination per explanation. Buidhe (talk) 23:22, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: nomination withdrawed. -- Darwin Ahoy! 03:25, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Я перепутал год. Karmanov2000 (talk) 15:16, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 11:47, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by World Guardian Security Services (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seems to be promo-only files.
- File:Company profile.png
- File:WORLD-GUARDIAN-security-black-new-SMALL-LOGO.jpg
- File:WORLD-GUARDIAN-email-small-white-LOGO.jpg
- File:WORLD GUARDIAN big white LOGO.jpg
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:23, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Advertising so speedy - thanks. --Herby talk thyme 11:26, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Unlicensed Green macaroni (talk) 17:18, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Arthur Crbz at 20:04, 27 Januar 2020 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 02:04, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Missing H on carboxyl oxygen; poor angles, missing stereochemistry. Have multiple alternatives in Category:Benzylpenicillin DMacks (talk) 17:42, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 21:36, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(15561659860).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(15746509615).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque 34
[edit]No FOP in Morocco
- File:Arcs de la Mosquée Hassan-II.jpg
- File:Hassan II Mosque - Grande Mosquée Hassan II.jpg
- File:Mosque Hassan II, Casablanca, Morocco, 摩洺哥.jpg
- File:MOSQUEE HASSAN II.jpg
- File:Mosquée Hassan II -2.jpg
- File:Mustapha ennaimi - 23768064204.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Furthermore File:MOSQUEE HASSAN II.jpg is previously published and would need a separate VRT permission from the photographer even if we obtained a general permission for the mosque. ~Cybularny Speak? 13:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: by Krd. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque 35
[edit]No FOP in Morocco
- File:Casablanca, Morocco (51256636929).jpg
- File:الدار البيضاء مسجد الحسن الثاني.jpg
- File:جامع الحسن الثاني.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: by Jameslwoodward. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo of a slide at a conference, the slide is prominent in the image and not freely-licensed. It was my mistake for uploading Victorgrigas (talk) 02:09, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: by Yann. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:30, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out scope. An insignificant person, an ordinary schoolboy GAndy (talk) 03:36, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:30, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Out scope. An insignificant person, an ordinary schoolboy GAndy (talk) 03:36, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:30, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:31, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:31, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:31, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dheerajjamalpur (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self promo on en.wiki
- File:Dheeraj Murmu 8.jpg
- File:Dheeraj Murmu 7.jpg
- File:Dheeraj Murmu 6.jpg
- File:Dheeraj Murmu 5.jpg
- File:Dheeraj Murmu 4.jpg
- File:Dheeraj Murmu3.jpg
- File:Dheeraj Murmu 2.jpg
- File:Dheeraj Murmu 1.jpg
- File:Dheeraj Murmu.jpg
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 14:53, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:11, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:12, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure, strange colouring of atom labels. Have File:Structural formula of methylmagnesium iodide.svg as high-quality vector replacement. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 21:00, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:02, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Ahmadtalk 20:37, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 16:15, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:02, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 01:54, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:31, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, taken from autotrader.co.uk (see watermark) mr.choppers (talk)-en- 03:55, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:33, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
99% copyvio. Users other upload a clear copyvio, also small and lacking EXIF data. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 03:57, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:33, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
我不小心上傳它 心平星辰 (talk) 13:52, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Author request, uploaded by accident. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:35, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:35, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:35, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:36, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:36, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NahkRing Wik (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Aaloo Mill Barfkhana Kanpur .jpg
- File:Beauty of the Ruins 3.jpg
- File:Beauty of the Ruins 2.jpg
- File:Beauty of the Ruins 1.jpg
- File:Blue World Theme Park 1 Kanpur .jpg
- File:Blue World Theme Park 2 Kanpur .jpg
- File:Blue World Theme Park 3 Kanpur .jpg
- File:Blue World Theme Park 4 Kanpur .jpg
- File:Blue World Theme Park 5 Kanpur .jpg
- File:Blue World Theme Park 6 Kanpur .jpg
- File:Blue World Theme Park 7 Kanpur .jpg
- File:Elgin Mill No. 1 (2).jpg
- File:Elgin Mill No. 1.jpg
- File:JK Jute Mill 2.jpg
- File:JK Jute Mill 1.jpg
- File:Tafco (Hazari Bungalow) .png
- File:Tafco (unique architecture) .png
- File:Tafco (deserted arches) .png
- File:Tafco (Cobbled road).png
- File:Tafco (erstwhile workshop).png
- File:Tafco (broken shades).png
- File:Tafco .png
- File:Tafco (Tannery and Footwear Corporation of India).png
- File:Tafco Kanpur.png
- File:Tafco Kanpur (Dilapidated Windows).png
- File:Tafco.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:37, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:36, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AhmedGhanam (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:خلف جابر.jpg
- File:محمد عبدالناصر.jpg
- File:الأديب أحمد مجدي همام.jpg
- File:أحمد مجدي همام.jpg
- File:Mohamed elbaz.jpg
- File:Abdel wahab dawood.jpg
- File:شعار 195 سبورتس.png
- File:مصطفى الجارحي.jpg
- File:محمد الباز.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:39, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:38, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:38, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 18:35, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:39, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 18:39, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:39, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.
Mitte27 (talk) 18:43, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:39, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Copy of https://portaletc.com/dr-ronaldo-gorga-fala-da-importancia-do-estilo-de-vida-para-evitar-o-cancer-de-mama.html Edu! (talk) 20:21, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:40, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Utterly useless. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:46, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:30, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Commons:ADVERT O revolucionário aliado (talk) 03:20, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Previously published on https://www.flickr.com/photos/antunesphotos/49408358733/in/photostream/. Needs Com:OTRS permission. --Hanooz 15:24, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 06:37, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 15:08, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
No reason stated why this photograph would be in the public domain (PDM at Flickr) Strakhov (talk) 08:33, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: com:PCP per nomination. --Hanooz 15:06, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
https://desmotivaciones.es/6004500/Se-te-extrana, COM:LL, bad Flickr account. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:33, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: https://stock.adobe.com/de/148175582 ©Henry Romero / REUTERS. --Hanooz 15:42, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Unused file. Looks like personal artwork. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 16:00, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:28, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Obviousy a (bad) photograph of a page of a printed work – some print-through from the other side of the page is visible Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:51, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, own work is unlikely. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:29, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
The unused and uncategorised file. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:13, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Out of scope - some kind of personal artwork (black square with white streaks). --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:30, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Permission needed from Bank of Thailand (per COM:CUR Thailand)
- File:Thai baht 16s 1000 front.jpg
- File:Thai baht 16s 1000 back.jpg
- File:Thai baht 16s 500 back.jpg
- File:Thai baht 16s 500 front.jpg
- File:Thai baht 16s 100 front.jpg
- File:Thai baht 16s 50 back.jpg
- File:Thai baht 16s 50 front.jpg
- File:Thai baht 16s 100 back.jpg
- File:Thai baht 16s 20 back.jpg
- File:Thai baht 16 20 front.jpg
- File:Thai baht 15s 1000 back.jpg
- File:Серия 15. Банкнота номиналом 1000 тайских бат. Лицевая сторона.jpg
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 14:51, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:54, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Ridiculously low quality, replaced by File:L-2,3-Bisphosphoglycerat.svg DMacks (talk) 18:12, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Extremely poor-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background, pixelated and bad geometry (not drawn according to standards). Proposed replacement is of high-quality! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 07:32, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:33, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Low graphical quality, and border and in-image caption text that interfere with reuse. Have File:L-2,3-Bisphosphoglycerat.svg as replacement DMacks (talk) 18:13, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Extremely poor-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background, pixelated and bad geometry (not drawn according to standards). Proposed replacement is of high-quality! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 07:38, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:32, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Magdalenasroka6 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:"Pszczoły i trzmiele" Marta Antoniak.jpg
- File:"Obiad", Plastikowe gardło.jpg
- File:"Plastic Throat" Marta Antoniak.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Source states: "I do not own the audio or footage in this video. They belong to their rightful owners."
- File:Urassaya in Shopee Live, July 2019.jpg
- File:Urassaya in Stars on Star, Dec 2019.jpg
- File:Nadech in 3 zaap TheCrownPrincess.jpg
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:29, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- and thus YouTube uploader can't release the files as CC-BY-3.0 unless all sources can be verified. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:30, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from painting. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- You are entirely correct. I apologise for not realising it upon upload, and will remove the photo from the article in which it is being used immediately. Thanks for catching it! Avelludo (talk) 02:53, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Fake Flag for a not so-real Micronation, Only Sources show the flag is taken from a 'fandom' website: https://flags.fandom.com/wiki/Republic_of_Transmania https://james-bennett.fandom.com/wiki/Republic_of_Transmania BlinxTheKitty (talk) 16:24, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:28, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Garbage quality, not in use. Problems inherited from the source map:- (i) Most seriously, Kintyre peninsula (still a part of the mainland) entirely missing! (ii) Excessive rounding-off of features, arguably to point of being misleading, (iii) Not a map of the entire UK (inc. Northern Ireland) as labelled, but of Great Britain only, excluding smaller islands; if this was intent, it should be labelled as such. Ubcule (talk) 21:11, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:18, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Garbage quality inaccurate map; not in use. Problems inherited from the source map:- (i) Most seriously, Kintyre peninsula (still a part of the mainland) entirely missing! (ii) Excessive rounding-off of features, arguably to point of being misleading, (iii) Not a map of the entire UK (inc. Northern Ireland) as labelled, but of Great Britain only, excluding smaller islands; if this was intent, it should be labelled as such. Ubcule (talk) 21:12, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:17, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Garbage quality inaccurate map; not in use. Problems inherited from the source map:- (i) Most seriously, Kintyre peninsula (still a part of the mainland) entirely missing! (ii) Excessive rounding-off of features, arguably to point of being misleading, (iii) Not a map of the entire UK (inc. Northern Ireland) as labelled, but of Great Britain only, excluding smaller islands; if this was intent, it should be labelled as such. Ubcule (talk) 21:12, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:17, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Garbage quality inaccurate map; not in use. Problems inherited from the source map:- (i) Most seriously, Kintyre peninsula (still a part of the mainland) entirely missing! (ii) Excessive rounding-off of features, arguably to point of being misleading, (iii) Not a map of the entire UK (inc. Northern Ireland) as labelled, but of Great Britain only, excluding smaller islands; if this was intent, it should be labelled as such. Ubcule (talk) 21:12, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:17, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Inaccurate garbage; do we need to retain this misleading map, even though it's in use at German and Luxembourgish Wikipedias? Even if it's only meant to show mainland Great Britain, the Kintyre peninsula (still a part of the mainland) is entirely missing! This is on top of the excessive rounding which renders the accuracy poor at best. Ubcule (talk) 21:29, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: I've replaced the two remaining uses. The map was only used as a placeholder in a template in each case, and I've replaced it with a better map that also has the right dimensions to make the imagemap in the template work. --bjh21 (talk) 12:46, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:16, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
There is no proof that the file is not under copyright. -- 176.59.41.248 23:10, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:12, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal photo from flickr; out of scope. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:22, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:12, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo of non-notable people (likely taken without their knowledge) and a copyrighted ad Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:58, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:11, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Possible exceeded copyright threshold.
- File:RecordTV logo.png
- File:IG logo.png
- File:Zap Imóveis logo.svg
- File:Unitel logo.png
- File:Grupo Oi logo.png
- File:Logo OI TV.png
- File:Oi logo green.png
- File:Oi logo Purple.png
- File:Downtown Filmes logo.jpg
轻语者 (talk) 04:05, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: without prejudice. A global lock for Juan90264 is possible on M:SRG and it is created by the sockpuppeteer, enWiki confirmed by CU. --64.113.165.126 16:27, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:18, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:41, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:17, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted book cover A1Cafel (talk) 08:01, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:16, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted book cover A1Cafel (talk) 08:01, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:16, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
According to the file itself, photograph by "Alfonso" (es:Alfonso Sánchez García), a famous 20th-century-photographer, who, unfortunatedly, died in 1953. Undelete in 2034. Strakhov (talk) 11:09, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:14, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope – a poem written by the uploader. TFerenczy (talk) 11:28, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:13, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
An insignificant person, no articles (in Russian Wikipedia, the article was quickly deleted in 2014). Person depicted in the photos is listed as author. GAndy (talk) 12:22, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:12, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Looks like TV screenshot Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 13:00, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:12, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of https://www.facebook.com/1023416334448210/photos/a.1538625569593948/2550584728398022/?type=3&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:06, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:11, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:09, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
There is no evidence that the uploader holds the actual copyright to the program that this screenshot is from. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:07, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:30, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
The person in this photo would prefer it to be removed from publicly available websites. 2620:0:1000:1610:E03E:2750:30DF:BDB5 00:19, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Why didn't User:Evanrosen request that? --Achim (talk) 09:25, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Good question. Thanks for checking. I've logged in now and would like this photo to be deleted. Does that help the case? --Evanrosen (talk) 18:11, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:30, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Noticeably it is a cropped version of en:File:Suva City, View From Suva Harbour .jpg, which is watermarked "www.JoeTourist.ca". Likely a variant of a copyvio file JWilz12345 (talk) 00:47, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:29, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 02:11, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:29, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
According to the correspondence received via the OTRS system, the required permission cannot and will not be provided as the uploader doesn't know the name of the photographer who took the picture Pawel Niemczuk (talk) 02:22, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:28, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 1961. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:54, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:27, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Commons:ADVERT O revolucionário aliado (talk) 03:19, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - useful pic; the advert can easily be cloned out - MPF (talk) 01:40, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ahmadtalk 18:31, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Exif shows that the image source is Facebook, may not be the uploader's own work, requires OTRS authorization
Catherine Laurence discussion 14:43, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Si è vero, ma è il mio account facebook, da cui ho ripreso le mie foto. Le opere sono effettivamente mie. Yes it is true, but it is my facebook account, from which I took my photos. The works are actually mine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PROPOLI87 (talk • contribs) 14:59, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
A questo punto chiedo: Sono stati mantenuti o cancellati? E inoltre, ho altri file da caricare, di mie foto recuperate dal mio account facebook, come devo comportarmi? At this point I ask: Were they maintained or canceled? And besides, I have other files to upload, of my photos recovered from my facebook account, how should I behave? User talk:PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 20:16, 18 November 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by PROPOLI87 (talk • contribs) 15:07, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
{{Autotranslate|1=File:Ape impollinatrice 1.jpg|2=Files uploaded by PROPOLI87|3=|base=Idw}} PROPOLI87 (talk) 10:27, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
L'opera è mia, nel frattempo però ho ricaricato file non ripresi dal mio account fb, ma da una pen drive dove archivio le mie foto. Non so esattamente come comportarmi. PROPOLI87 (talk) 10:31, 19 November 2019 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 10:31, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Ho aggiunto ai tre file il link con permesso dei miei profili facebook PROPOLI87 (talk) 16:11, 22 November 2019 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 16:11, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep (I translate) The photographer just downloaded the images from his Facebook personal account, and proposed to re-upload the original files (which I suppose he already did). There is no reason to doubt those are his own work, considering also his other uploads. --Sailko (talk) 17:06, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep OTRS is necessary for newbies or critical users, for established users we can simply trust good faith, and a simple re-upload can be suggested without starting deletion procedures. --Alexmar983 (talk) 18:20, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per explanation by uploader. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:27, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Italy.
- File:Rignano sull'Arno - murales dedicato a Giovanni Falcone.jpg
- File:Rignano sull'Arno Camminamento Giardini Lord Robert Baden Powel con Graffiti - Murales di notte.jpg
- File:Rignano sull'Arno Camminamento Giardini Lord Robert Baden Powel con Graffiti - Murales.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 25 January 2020 (UTC) Excuse me. If it does not respect the wikimedia commons license fees, please cancel - PROPOLI87 (talk) 12:26, 26 January 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 12:26, 26 January 2020 (UTC) I took the photograph, but at this point I don't know if the subject is photographable and can therefore obtain a Wikimedia license. So just cancel. Sorry and thank you. PROPOLI87 (talk) 14:30, 4 February 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 14:30, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:28, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Distritodesanlorenzo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
- File:Sanlorenzo.png
- File:Santa-marc3ada-la-antigua-del-daric3a9n.png
- File:Tolé2020.png
- File:Tierras altas.jpg
- File:Sanfelizmuni.png
- File:Renacim202p.jpg
- File:2020remedios.png
- File:Dolega67.png
- File:DistricDavid.png
- File:Bugaba2020.png
- File:Boquete2020.jpg
- File:Boqueron2020.jpg
- File:Barudistrto.png
- File:2020alanje.png
- File:Herreraprov.png
- File:Escudo de Bocas del Toro.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:48, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Distritodesanlorenzo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:GUALAQJEÑO.jpg
- File:Pacas El Pifá on Instagram Ayer en el gran pool(JPG) 1.jpg
- File:Patronalesbocamonte.png
- File:S.lorenzorío20.jpg
- File:Bocachica2020.png
- File:Elcoco2020.png
- File:Plazahorconxito.jpg
- File:ParadorHor2020.png
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Distritodesanlorenzo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
- File:Logo-png-embera.png
- File:Escudox.jpg
- File:ESCUDO VERAGUAS NO OFICIAL.jpg
- File:PROVPanama.png
- File:Escudo panama.jpg
- File:Munide panama.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:44, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Distritodesanlorenzo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete all the files. The user believes that Commons is a site that can upload images as a social network. Taichi (talk) 03:07, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Distritodesanlorenzo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo/flag. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:2020Chiriquí.png
- File:PRDpanamá.jpg
- File:Prdpanama.jpg
- File:Hinomaru-bandera-japon-610x406.png
- File:2020madugandí.png
- File:Madugandí2020.png
- File:Los santos flag.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
- File:PRDpanamá.jpg and File:Prdpanama.jpg would certainly be in scope, and appear to qualify for PD-textlogo. Although preferably one should be chosen to keep and one to delete. Fry1989 eh? 17:47, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - 1 kept as per Fry1989. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:02, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation 6characters (talk) 15:32, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:26, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Per Commons:Screenshots, software screen captures are not free Ytoyoda (talk) 19:34, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:25, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Mediocre photo of random unidentified houses. Unlikely to have any educational or historical value. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:18, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- Nice adjective for a photo..
- Perfect illustration of a street at San Francisco showing houses, cars, disposal of electric lines, good quality photo. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 00:53, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: ok, I added a category. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:24, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Random view from a train. Unlikely to have any educational or historical value. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:38, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:21, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Thayná R Souza (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical and promo photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Show emcaetanopolis.jpg
- File:Gravação do CD Storm Hate.jpg
- File:Ensaio no estudio JC em 1991.jpg
- File:Gravação do Primeiro Demo Tape Ilusão, em 1990, no Studio 108.jpg
- File:Fase Punk da Banda Renegados.jpg
- File:Banda Renegados em Show em Iuna, Espirito Santo.jpg
- File:Show da Banda Renegados em Divinopolis, em 201 Festival Ruidos Extremos XVI Edição.jpg
- File:Banda Renegados estrea como Power Trio, em 1993.jpg
- File:Show da Banda Renegados no festival Speed Thrash Death Metal, em Belo Horizonte, em 1988.jpg
- File:Banda Renegados em evento na sede da gravadora cogumelo, em 1980..jpg
- File:Formação da banda Renegados em 2019.jpg
- File:Show da Banda Renegados no evento Y em 2019..jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unlikely to be own works (note that one had Facebook metadatas). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:29, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Historical paintings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:27, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 18:25, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:40, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 16:05, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
File:Main shrine and Purification trough (temizuya) of Tarenui-jinja shrine (Miho village, Ibaraki Pref.).jpg
[edit]_of_Tarenui-jinja_shrine_(Miho_village,_Ibaraki_Pref.).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_of_Tarenui-jinja_shrine_(Miho_village,_Ibaraki_Pref.).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
本人依頼。キャプションが 小石川人晃 (talk) 21:56, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion: uploader requested deletion on the day of upload. --Yasu (talk) 15:55, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Commons:ADVERT O revolucionário aliado (talk) 03:16, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - useful photo, the advertising watermark can easily be removed - MPF (talk) 01:31, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 23:57, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Commons:ADVERT O revolucionário aliado (talk) 03:16, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: absurd deletion request. Ruthven (msg) 23:57, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Commons:ADVERT O revolucionário aliado (talk) 03:17, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep the advert can easily be cloned out - MPF (talk) 01:35, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: absurd deletion request. Ruthven (msg) 23:57, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Commons:ADVERT O revolucionário aliado (talk) 03:18, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 23:58, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Commons:ADVERT O revolucionário aliado (talk) 03:18, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - the picture is good and useful and with a valid license; the advertising watermark can easily be edited out (I'll do it now) - MPF (talk) 01:19, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: absurd deletion request. Ruthven (msg) 23:58, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Commons:ADVERT O revolucionário aliado (talk) 03:19, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: absurd deletion request. Ruthven (msg) 23:58, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Commons:ADVERT O revolucionário aliado (talk) 03:20, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - useful pic; the advert can easily be cloned out - MPF (talk) 01:45, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: absurd deletion request. Ruthven (msg) 23:58, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Commons:ADVERT O revolucionário aliado (talk) 03:20, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 23:59, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Commons:ADVERT O revolucionário aliado (talk) 03:21, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: absurd deletion request. Ruthven (msg) 23:59, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Commons:ADVERT O revolucionário aliado (talk) 03:21, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: nonsense. Ruthven (msg) 00:00, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Iraq A1Cafel (talk) 04:41, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 00:00, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 17:01, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 00:03, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
According to the file description, photograph by "Alfonso" (es:Alfonso Sánchez García), a famous 20th-century-photographer, who, unfortunatedly, died in 1953. Undelete in 2034. Strakhov (talk) 18:04, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 00:06, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Too blurry to be of any value Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:43, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 00:08, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 08:01, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:38, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
file uncategorized Memorialman (talk) 08:18, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- The file has been categorized. Et0048 (talk) 05:06, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:38, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
out of project scope Veracious (talk) 09:12, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:39, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
-VOA.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-VOA.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The video from VOA doesn't look like they have actually sent anyone to Wuhan to get the shot for the hospital. I think they just have their staff interviewing passengers coming from Wuhan to New York, and the video footages of Wuhan are just stock footages that are not properly credited. The two VOA journalists, Fang Bing and Jiu Dao are not stationed in China, as we could tell from previous news pieces they produced. Techyan（Talk） 10:18, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
-VOA.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep. I think all video programs which produced by VOA are public domain.--Shwangtianyuan (talk) 12:53, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- No, of course not. VOA often use contents (textual, imagery, and video) from news agencies such as Reuters and AP. Most of these are credited with text saying the corrsponding agency but some are not. There is only one or two VOA corrspondent stationed in China, and if the video/image is not produced by that person, it is very likely that the piece of video/image is from another agency thus copyrighted. --Techyan（Talk） 21:34, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The nominator has no evidence this is not public domain, just a suspiscion. The video producer would definitely have aquired the rights to use and publish this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:48, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep if this is stock footage filmed by the VOA then it is the property of the VOA, therefore is properly licensed. Since the nom suspects it to be stock footage, where's the problem with the VOA using its own archives? -- 67.70.33.184 06:27, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep "I think" is a suspicion, not documentation. It can very easily be footage from a previous recording made by an employee or it might be contributed by a viewer, hundreds of westerners are in that town, in that case only VOA will have a problem by not crediting the photographer. In addition, the threshold of origiality is pretty much non existing, ten people pointing their cell phones that way would get virtually identical images, since the image only shows immovable objects. Valentinian T / C 12:02, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Revisit
[edit]-VOA.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
I have taken a wikibreak for several days and it was quite a shock to me when I saw these keep votes in this deletion request today. Let me make some clarification first:
- As a Chinese national who spent plenty of my spare time contributing to the Wuhan Coronavirus outbreak article on English Wikipedia, I, of course, want to bring more information about the outbreak onto Wikimedia projects. However, the willingness to bring more information doesn't mean this piece of copyright-infringing image should stay here. I suspect many of the keep votes above are here because people don't want the image of the hospital to be deleted, regardless of its copyright status. This is not a correct attitude when handling images on Commons.
- When handling videos/images from VOA, several other Wikimedians, including myself, are more experienced than you do. I used to upload images captured from China News Services, a state-run media which published some of its videos under CC licenses on YouTube, with extreme caution. Because China News Services mix third-party footages with their own footages without any indications. However, after several others discovered CNS's videos are "copyright-free," they started to put everything from CNS onto Commons. It is the same case here - although VOA gives credit to third-party footage most of the time (unlike CNS), there are still many videos produced by VOA without proper credits, and this video is one of them.
- Furthermore, VOA has plenty of videos about China - just check out their website/YouTube channel - but very few of them got uploaded onto Commons. That's because most experienced users who know how to handle VOA videos know which could be uploaded and which couldn't, thus avoid scenarios like this messed-up deletion request from the first place.
- An example of this is when I was handling images on the 70th anniversary of the founding of the P.R. China last year. 90% of what's on VOA were from news agencies like AP, AFP, and Reuters - which are not acceptable on Commons. The VOA-original and Commons-compliant videos were the ones with crappy resolutions (probably 480p), and with their Beijing's correspondents' names. All other images/videos were completely useless. That's why I made my speculation based on the lack of their Beijing correspondents' names and the fact that they were interviewing in New York.
- Besides VOA and CNS, Commons has been sourcing from Fars News Agency - and this is another case where uploaders need to look carefully at which piece of image is Commons-compliant and which isn't. Fars use a lot of images from other news agencies on their websites, and those need to be avoided. Category:Photos from Farsnews.com have detailed that only images with Fars' watermark could be uploaded and they will need to be Image-Reviewed.
- Several keep votes above have fundamentally misunderstood how deletion requests work on Commons. Having reasonable speculation on how and why an image should be infringing copyright could result in deletion, as long as the speculation has good reasons. It's the one who uploads the image needs to present evidence on why their upload is legit, not the other way around. "Speculations" like "missing EXIF" "image looks like being compressed, thus might not be own work" "newbies with most of its images deleted" are good reasons to nominate an image for deletion.
- @Valentinian: Claimed this picture doesn't meet the Threshold of Originality. This is simply not true. Even though one may take exactly the same picture from exactly the same position, it still creates a "new" copyright whenever someone pressed the shutter button. If what Valentinian said is how copyright works, then no one will be out for taking new pictures. You should definitely learn more about copyright before making such a claim.
- This is partially true in some rare cases. A truthful scan of a painting, document, or a near-identical replica will not create "new" copyright. However, if the photographer pointing their camera to something at an angle, or their photographic technique could be demonstrated by picking the correct angle to get the best shot (such as pointing at a 3D object), "new" copyright will be generated. Additionally, whether a truthful scan of a 2D painting will create "new" copyright or not varies depending on the exact jurisdiction, so at least, on Commons, whether a truthful scan of a 2D object (especially those already in public domain due to old age) is copyrightable, still defaults to "yes".
- @Graeme Bartlett: The publisher, in this case, VOA, has the right to use the footage and gained "new" copyright by compiling different pieces of copyrighted videos, means VOA's new video, as a whole, is copyright-free, because VOA could waive their copyright; however, on Commons, we do care about the individual pieces made up the whole video, and taking a single frame from the whole video is not acceptable. Or otherwise, we could take whatever Reuters and AP footage from VOA's video and claim it public domain.
- VOA seemed to remove their original video from their own website, but a copy could be found here on YouTube. The image of this hospital appears on 0:50.
- If you watch this video very carefully, you will find out that the footage which shows around the hospital are live videos, with, at least, some plants moving with the breeze (0:54-1:08). However, only the shots of the hospital itself (0:50-0:54) look completely still, just like they were putting an image found randomly on the internet instead of videos on it. This discovery deepens my speculation.
Back to topic. I looked into this image and its sources for around 45 minutes and finally found out where VOA got this piece of uncredited image from.
- Turn this image into Googe Image search will take us to this website of a Hong Kong media with the exact picture as we have on Commons. This piece of news was from January 20th, which comes later than the date of this image's upload (January 23th), thus this could not be used as direct evidence of copyright infringement. However, by clicking on the image, it says 無綫新聞截圖, which means "screenshot from Television Broadcast Limited." Television Broadcast Limited, or TVB, is TV broadcaster in Hong Kong.
- TVB has a handy website where it lists all its TV news segments for free. So that's where I spent most of my 45 minutes looking through all relevant videos.
- By comparing VOA's footage with TVB's previous news coverage, we could find several identical frames.
- From 0:20 to 0:26 of this piece of news by TVB, everything looks identical to VOA's video at 0:54. The place where the taxi and the bus parked are identical as well, which means these are exactly the same footage, instead of both camera crew just happened to shoot from the same position, as Valentinian suggested above. Also, 1:04-1:14 in the TVB video also matches up with 0:57-1:08 in the VOA's. VOA's video came out on January 18th, while TVB's coverage came out earlier on 14th, thus ruling out the possibility that TVB had used VOA's footage.
- The still shot of the hospital has a match as well. It perfectly matched 0:35 of this TVB's video. Again, VOA's video comes several hours late than TVB's video, after adjusting the time zone.
So that's it. VOA didn't take the picture of the hospital.
But where does VOA's footage came from? First of all, we could rule out the possibility of VOA stealing TVB's footage, as we could tell that VOA didn't crop out subtitles and the watermark in TVB's video. I speculate that this video may come from CNS or Xinhua, another China's state-run news agency, as a raw editing material for all media which have subscribed to Xinhua's video could use. Then I went and checked Xinhua's database, found a match, but Xinhua's identical video (here's another one with a better preview) didn't come out until the 19th. So I guess that's where all the traces stopped, and I can't dig further anymore.
I hope we all learned something at the end of the day. I have spent near 3 hours so far proving why this image needs to be deleted, and I personally have a better understanding on how VOA's copyright works and we should realize that we need more caution when dealing with things from VOA.
I am not the kind of person who wants Commons to be 100% clean on copyright and try to delete every image that I deemed infringing copyright based on my personal taste, and I think my analysis above proved that. It is also worth mentioning that, by using more media files from VOA and CNSes, we are discouraging our own volunteers from taking first-hand pictures ourselves. This picture was actually outdated, as the hospital itself changed its name but it still says the old name in this one.
--Techyan（Talk） 16:33, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
historical photo of unknown author, not own work. copyvio Drakosh (talk) 11:30, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:44, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
I as the uploader want this file to be deleted because I did not have the consent of the depicted persons for publication. I want to correct this error. Sportfreund.php (talk) 12:09, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I as the uploader want this file to be deleted because I did not have the consent of the depicted persons for publication. I want to correct this error. Sportfreund.php (talk) 12:10, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I as the uploader want this file to be deleted because I did not have the consent of the depicted persons for publication. I want to correct this error. Sportfreund.php (talk) 12:12, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I as the uploader want this file to be deleted because I did not have the consent of the depicted persons for publication. I want to correct this error. Sportfreund.php (talk) 12:13, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
I as the uploader want this file to be deleted because I did not have the consent of the depicted persons for publication. I want to correct this error. Sportfreund.php (talk) 12:14, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
I as the uploader want this file to be deleted because I did not have the consent of the depicted persons for publication. I want to correct this error. Sportfreund.php (talk) 12:19, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:48, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Paddington station location map.svg is the same but (non-deprecated) better format Adam37 (talk) 13:06, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:50, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Look like a COM:DW. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:43, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: taken from web, no evidence of {{PD-USgov}}. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:51, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Not a work of an employee of the Congress as part of that person’s official duties. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:48, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:51, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Official document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:48, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
map data unlikely own work, no source Krd 14:57, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: very basic map, no proprietary info. As per COM:DW: The factual information, such as boundary lines and locations of landmarks, is supposedly unprotected.. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:11, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
out of project scope: COM:EDUSE Maximilian Reininghaus (talk) 22:39, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:12, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unidentified and unidentifiable stairway. Seems to have no significance, and unlikely to be in scope. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:16, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: in scope of Category:Stairs in California. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:17, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Overexposed, needlessly desaturated, and poorly cropped photo. We have plenty of better pictures of this exact streetcar and of this exact stop; this photo contributes nothing of historical value. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:54, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- None are these are criteria for deletion.
- Plus, there is not area overexposed, desaturation is not a issue. Number of photos is also not a issue, 12 is not plenty.
- Different location, different date... all important.
- -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 01:25, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:19, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
PBS is not a government agency so it's production does not make this public domain. The fact that PBS posted a story about what the House produced and the House having produced this does not make it in the public domain. This is a screenshot of a calendar program so absent evidence that the software was licensed in the public domain, there's a layer of copyright here. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:09, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Also we do not keep PDFs of images. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:19, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted icon A1Cafel (talk) 02:24, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:18, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
This is not Georg Joseph Kamel. It is a portrait of John Ray found at the British National Portrait Museum. Glendoremus (talk) 04:16, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Glendoremus: You can request to rename this file. 轻语者 (talk) 04:18, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Glendoremus:
- There's already a much higher-resolution file of this John Ray portrait but I'll move it if you really think that's necessary.Glendoremus (talk) 19:12, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
@Glendoremus and Gampe: I request to rename this file to File:John Ray (1).jpg. 轻语者 (talk) 00:16, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @Glendoremus and 轻语者:
Support, Sorry, I didn't notice. I change my mind and vote to delete it. not because of the bad name, but because it would be an unnecessary duplicate.--Gampe (talk) 06:06, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:20, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR Iraq, copyright of currency in Iraq is held by Central Bank of Iraq and they are copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 04:55, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:21, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR Iraq, copyright of currency in Iraq is held by Central Bank of Iraq and they are copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 04:55, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:21, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR Iraq, copyright of currency in Iraq is held by Central Bank of Iraq and they are copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 04:55, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:21, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR Iraq, copyright of currency in Iraq is held by Central Bank of Iraq and they are copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 04:55, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:21, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR Iraq, copyright of currency in Iraq is held by Central Bank of Iraq and they are copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 04:55, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:21, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:CUR Iraq, copyright of currency in Iraq is held by Central Bank of Iraq and they are copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 04:55, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:21, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:CUR Iraq, copyright of currency in Iraq is held by Central Bank of Iraq and they are copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 04:55, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:21, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Per COM:CUR Iraq, copyright of currency in Iraq is held by Central Bank of Iraq and they are copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 04:57, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:21, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:CUR Iraq, copyright of currency in Iraq is held by Central Bank of Iraq and they are copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 04:57, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:22, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:CUR Iraq, copyright of currency in Iraq is held by Central Bank of Iraq and they are copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 04:57, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:22, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Per COM:CUR Iraq, copyright of currency in Iraq is held by Central Bank of Iraq and they are copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:22, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR Iraq, copyright of currency in Iraq is held by Central Bank of Iraq and they are copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:22, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR Iraq, copyright of currency in Iraq is held by Central Bank of Iraq and they are copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:22, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:CUR Iraq, copyright of currency in Iraq is held by Central Bank of Iraq and they are copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:22, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The main subject (the train) is largely hidden behind trees. We have plenty of better shots of this specific train. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:12, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:23, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Bahrain A1Cafel (talk) 06:39, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:23, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 06:45, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:23, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 06:48, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:23, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 06:48, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:24, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded an incorrect image Warrior3005 (talk) 06:50, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:24, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyright holder is Mohamed Hamed, and no proof that he is an employee from U.S. Government. Possible license laundering A1Cafel (talk) 07:25, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:24, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyright holder is Mohamed Hamed, and no proof that he is an employee from U.S. Government. Possible license laundering A1Cafel (talk) 07:25, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:24, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:31, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:24, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:32, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:24, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Color-version of a bw-file, not from the given source. With a signature Mutter Erde (talk) 07:32, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Colorization gives rise to a new copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:25, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
The file is an image from Pexels with unknown date of upload to Pexels. Per Template:Pexels-Cc-zero, all files from Pexels published after 2018-07-05 are unfree. With unknown date of original uploading, it is unknown that whether the file is free. 廣九直通車 (talk) 08:17, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:25, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, artist born 1975 Martin Sg. (talk) 10:10, 25 January 2020 (UTC) hallo, the atist miriam lenk shares this picture Miriam Lenk Säule 2016.jpg on her website www.miriamlenk.de and gives permission for sharing it.It was also online and in paper in: Georg Becker: Eine Säule in Berlin. Südkurier, 13. Januar 2017.thank you for taking care for copyright issues,best regards, roland
Deleted: per nomination - There is no indication of a free license on the source site. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:27, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, artist born 1975 Martin Sg. (talk) 10:10, 25 January 2020 (UTC) hallo, the artist miriam lenk permitted the share of the pictures studio miriam lenk.jpg.source: the artists website www.miriamlenk.de — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rolandhirschmann (talk • contribs) 23:25, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - There is no indication of a free license on the source site. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:28, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Doesn’t appear to be the work of El Grafico, especially as the description says it was from an advertisement, not an editorial page. A wider crop of the photo is available elsewhere and there’s no evidence the photo was first registered in Argentina. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:23, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Comment I don't know if –as the nominator states– the photo was first published on another media. The image uploaded is from an ESPN Latin America advertisement which uses Argentine language idioms to refer to Jordan ("este negro/this black", which sounds at least inappropriate nowadays). The dimensions of the scan (see ad on p. 71) do not allow to appreciate any copyright notice to verify if the photo was registered by ESPN LA or the magazine itself, or has another source.- Moreover, I uploaded the image in good faith, assuming that it was first published in El Gráfico. - Fma12 (talk) 19:52, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Actually, it looks like it is an El Grafico photograph, so I think the tag is fine. Sorry! Withdrawing the nomination Ytoyoda (talk) 20:15, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:29, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Banknote released in 2017. Per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1969 are copyrighted. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 13:33, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Banknote designed in 2014. Per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1969 are copyrighted. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 13:35, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Banknote released in 1997. Per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1969 are copyrighted. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 13:38, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Banknote released in 1989. Per Commons:Currency#Argentina and List of countries' copyright length banknotes and coins from Argentina less then 50 years old, i.e. created after December, 31 1969 are copyrighted. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 13:39, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
unknown photographer of the 1930s is unlikely to be in PD Goesseln (talk) 15:05, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Bitte in deutscher Übersetzungː ... "is unlikely to be in PD". ...
- bitte signieren --Goesseln (talk) 16:34, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- nicht in public domain = nicht gemeinfrei --Goesseln (talk) 16:34, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- Was es nicht alles so gibt. Ist ja interessant. Es lebe die Allmend. Gruß --Michael Eyl (talk) 10:46, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dr. Hamza Ebrahim (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos, documents, painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Ashura-Nowshera-1910.jpg
- File:Karbala-heads-paraded.jpg
- File:The-Argus-10000-Hazara-slaves-Fri-20-Oct-1893-Pg5.jpg
- File:Urdu-akhbar.png
- File:کتاب تحفہ اثناعشریہ.gif
- File:Ali-hairi.jpg
- File:Shamzai.jpg
- File:Thehri Massacre.jpg
- File:فتویٰ.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
These are all important files and I have provided information about them. If you need more, please ask one by one.
Dr. Hamza Ebrahim (talk) 15:40, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Most -- "own work" claims are absurd, particularly for a 1910 image. Several file s had recent dates. The three I kept are all clearly PD-old. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license Gunofficial1998 (talk) 15:48, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
There is no Dave Scott page, nor does he come up in any search for his name. This photo does not really demonstrate a meteorologist actually doing anything related to their work. Dave is a local broadcaster. He is not well known outside of San Diego. The subject specifically contacted me and asked if the photo could not be used as it portrays him in less than a professional light. As the person who took the photo, and posted it, I would also like to see it deleted. Philkon (talk) 18:25, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per uploader's request. Sounds like it unintentionally caused some issues in the uploader's relations with the pictured person. Also, there is a potential derivative work issue with the background photo. Carl Lindberg (talk) 21:12, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Clindberg: yes, I also had DW concerns. I could blur the background, but that's a fair bit of work and considering all the other factors (image much less useful after blurring, subject unhappy) I'm not sure it's worth the trouble at all. There is some third party usage though, like [1]. My main worry (though this would be true for many images, but this one has been around 10+ years)) is that some copyright troll (not the uploader, just some random party, it's very common on YouTube at least) could threaten the San Diego Union-Tribune, and if we have deleted the image, how would they prove it was really free? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:01, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep file is used in a wiktionary article that needs an image focussing on a random TV weather presenter person; image is present here for 10+ years. Oppose if no replacement image with similar focus is found. Ankry (talk) 10:27, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Ankry: I'd argue that both Alex Deakin and Joop den Tonkelaar are better alternatives to illustrate a weather presenter. I had also discussed this at wikt:pl:Dyskusja wikisłownikarza:Maitake#pogodynek, Maitake didn't like the reflections originally visible on the Alex Deakin picture so I reduced the reflections. Haven't heard back from Maitake, so I assume they are fine with it now and I replaced the image on wikt:pl:pogodynek once again. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:01, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- No objections if the image is unused. Ankry (talk) 13:34, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Ankry: I'd argue that both Alex Deakin and Joop den Tonkelaar are better alternatives to illustrate a weather presenter. I had also discussed this at wikt:pl:Dyskusja wikisłownikarza:Maitake#pogodynek, Maitake didn't like the reflections originally visible on the Alex Deakin picture so I reduced the reflections. Haven't heard back from Maitake, so I assume they are fine with it now and I replaced the image on wikt:pl:pogodynek once again. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:01, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
_Alex_Deakin.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:42, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
The source article has been deleted due to irrelevance of the person. Sportfreund.php (talk) 11:33, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- That would only matter if it was a portrait/selfie or a picture of the person doing mundane things. A photograph of an organized women's football match from 50 years ago is quite educational and unique so perfectly within the scope of the project and I would keep it.--TFerenczy (talk) 12:32, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- But I also do not have the consent of the five or six clearly depicted persons. That was an error and I want to correct it.--Sportfreund.php (talk) 11:44, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: This was a public event at which you took a photo. Your permission was provided in the form of a license. You are free to ask the depicted persons but you can also use the {{Personality rights}} template. --Green Giant (talk) 20:04, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
I as the uploader want this file to be deleted because I did not have the consent of the depicted persons for publication. I want to correct this error. Sportfreund.php (talk) 12:18, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: This was a public event at which you took a photo. Your permission was provided in the form of a license. You are free to ask the depicted persons but you can also use the {{Personality rights}} template. --Green Giant (talk) 20:05, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I as the uploader want this file to be deleted because I did not have the consent of the depicted persons for publication. I want to correct this error. Sportfreund.php (talk) 12:19, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Privacy rights concerns not justified in my opinion – public setting and the distance makes it very difficult to actually recognize anyone.--TFerenczy (talk) 12:47, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: This was a public event at which you took a photo. Your permission was provided in the form of a license. You are free to ask the depicted persons but you can also use the {{Personality rights}} template. --Green Giant (talk) 20:05, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I hope there is a way we can keep these files but we lack a license for the photographs themselves. This user first started uploading files under cc-by-sa-3.0. Another user, Jgmikulay, came along after them and started adding {{PD-1923}} to some of their early files. Those early files like File:VictoriousCharge1898.jpg are fine. The uploader, Lonibug. eventually stopped adding cc licenses to their photos and started only including {{PD-US-1923}}. I assume because they did not think both were necessary. Now 7-8 years later, some of these later files cannot be kept unless we assume what they intended and add a license on behalf of the uploader. The following files are missing {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}. Can we just add them?
- File:WashingtonMonument1885.jpg
File:TheIdealScout1915.jpgFile:SteubenMonument1921.jpgFile:GoetheSchillerMonument1908.jpg- File:RDWhiteheadMonument1910.jpg
File:TAChapmanMemorial1896.jpgFile:SpiritofCommerce1881.jpg- File:R.D.WhiteheadMonument1910.jpg
File:WolcottMonument1919.jpgFile:BurnsMonument1909.jpgFile:LaphamMemorial1915.jpgFile:Elk1901.jpg- File:WilliamAStarkeMemorial1921.jpg
--- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 20:32, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- KEEP - Unfortunately, user "Lonibug" died in 2016 and will not be able to make any changes to the licensing of her uploads. However, I found she had uploaded many of these files to her Flikr site, including Ideal Scout, Steuben, and Goethe Schiller with a CC-BY-SA-2.0 license. That's a very strong argument that she would have been fine with adding CC-BY-SA-3.0 to all these files now. I vote KEEP and add CC-BY-SA-3.0. Johnson487682 (talk) 19:32, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
- Well spotted. I have gone ahead and put {{Cc-by-sa-2.0}} on those that were duplicated on Flickr. This is a tragic story. I am glad her legacy will live on and hope she rests in peace. There are only three photographs that have issues remaining. I agree is it not a big leap to assume she also intended for these to have a Creative Commons license as well. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 02:56, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: We can only assume that the photographer wanted to release the photos into the public domain. Although she is deceased, it is quite possible for the heirs to her estate to re-license her works. It is correct to include the various Flickr and other off-wiki licenses but it would have been incorrect to move such licenses to the 3.0 version unless there has been community agreement. We did this some years ago when all GFDL files being relicensed under CC-BY-SA-3.0. Also, please do try to use more appropriate templates such as the {{Art photo}} template. --Green Giant (talk) 20:48, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
And also: File:Хати Влащинці.jpg
Private property. Photographing is forbidden. No FoP in Ukraine. Микола Василечко (talk) 15:44, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 17:02, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
The file is mine. The mistake may be I posted it to Facebook first, and then pulled a copy from Facebook to add to the Commons. In retrospect, this is the wrong order to move/use files. I delete the original once it is posted in a public space. I wasn't aware Facebook added their Metadata to my photos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elwood P. Dowd (talk • contribs) 18:07, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Elwood P. Dowd: Please replace the file by the original photo, with original EXIF data. Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 00:04, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. PCP. Original can be reuploaded. --Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
I uploadet the SVG version File:HandballTV.ch Logo.svg Malo95 (talk) 17:27, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded a SVG Version File:WackerTV Logo.svg Malo95 (talk) 17:45, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
The source image was deleted because it is NOT pd --Killarnee (T•R•P) 16:30, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- I uploaded this image. IIRC, the source image was labeled as CC-0, and I assumed that was correct. If the source was erroneously labeled CC-0, then I agree this one should also be deleted. —Edgar.bonet (talk) 17:04, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Although the source file is already deleted, it appears to be identical to or derived from File:Earthmap1000x500.jpg. Could this be used instead? --Lasunncty (talk) 23:16, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Lasunncty: @Edgar.bonet: maybe? I assume it can be replaced, but the current version which will become a previous version must be deleted as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Earthmap1000x500compac.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Here is what appears to be the original source of the image. And this is the page that talks about acceptable use. --Lasunncty (talk) 08:45, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Lasunncty: @Edgar.bonet: maybe? I assume it can be replaced, but the current version which will become a previous version must be deleted as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Earthmap1000x500compac.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Although the source file is already deleted, it appears to be identical to or derived from File:Earthmap1000x500.jpg. Could this be used instead? --Lasunncty (talk) 23:16, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded a new version of this image based on World location map (equirectangular 180).svg. The old version, however, is still visible in the “File history” section. Is it possible to remove this old version from the visible history? —Edgar.bonet (talk) 12:46, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: Deleted the old version and kept the new version. —howcheng {chat} 00:42, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
