Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/10/13
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
It was uploaded by a mistake Christakis Flou (talk) 14:33, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Author requests can be speedily deleted per G7. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 14:42, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:32, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Cvrilehdik (talk) 23:57, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 14:51, 13 Oktober 2019 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 19:09, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
I don't how I got it here and don't want it. Noireallymeanit (talk) 09:36, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 14:48, 13 Oktober 2019 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 19:10, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
The image came out wrong and I want to delete it Lensburg (talk) 12:37, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 14:50, 13 Oktober 2019 UTC: The image came out wrong and I want to delete it --Krdbot 19:10, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Always the same COM:DW of the same image: https://issuu.com/beyoncediario/docs/beyonce4/16 Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:55, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 21:16, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
This file was for an article on Wikipedia that was deleted via AfD there and has no other use. Uploader has been blocked from WP for socking and was suspected of a conflict of interest 2001:8003:5999:6D00:1C33:A67C:6860:91CE 23:02, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
• Keep The image is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. The image was not just for the article that was recently deleted. The image might be used in other possible articles and should remain as that was the main reason for it being uploaded. There is use for the image. Georgivac (talk) 23:54, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
• Comment @2001:8003:5999:6D00:1C33:A67C:6860:91CE has not made any contributions to Wikimedia Commons and has chosen Nominated for deletion on all uploads under my account. The Reason for the nomination shows no validity to delete the image. Georgivac (talk) 23:55, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
- @2001:8003:5999:6D00:1C33:A67C:6860:91CE: If you want editors to assume good faith, please extend the same courtesy to them. Please read the Wikimedia Commons Etiquette. There are reasons for articles to be deleted but it is not a reason for an image to be deleted because an article it had been on was. The image can have many uses for other articles. Your explanation for this file is that the article on Wikipedia was deleted via AFD and there is no other use. My information demonstrates that there is. An article deleted doesn't mean that an image on it should be. You stated the uploader has been blocked indefinitely from Wikipedia for socking in association with the article concerned (Tony Ricca). Please note the uploader here isn't blocked indefinitely from Wikimedia Commons. On Wikipedia, it is blocked indefinitely not banned, for suspected sockpuppets. This is Wikimedia Commons and follow the proper guidelines. You stated "There is a draft but it should be speedied very soon." That statement doesn't show any contributions to helping someone that's drafting but demonstrates encouragement for it to not be there. That shows biased toward the individual. You're on Wikimedia Commons and nominated for deletion for the images of that individual. That is not permitted in the guidelines. Georgivac (talk) 23:56, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
- You have been blocked from Wikipedia for sock puppetry so you are exempt to the rules of AGF. Your information is wrong as the AfD there proves. He isn't notable. If anyone is biased in relation to this individual it's you. This picture and the others have NO other use. Not at all. (Note that I am the same person as the nominator as my IP changes constantly) 2001:8003:5999:6D00:9C80:257:E967:F8D4 06:50, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- @2001:8003:5999:6D00:1C33:A67C:6860:91CE: If you want editors to assume good faith, please extend the same courtesy to them. Please read the Wikimedia Commons Etiquette. There are reasons for articles to be deleted but it is not a reason for an image to be deleted because an article it had been on was. The image can have many uses for other articles. Your explanation for this file is that the article on Wikipedia was deleted via AFD and there is no other use. My information demonstrates that there is. An article deleted doesn't mean that an image on it should be. You stated the uploader has been blocked indefinitely from Wikipedia for socking in association with the article concerned (Tony Ricca). Please note the uploader here isn't blocked indefinitely from Wikimedia Commons. On Wikipedia, it is blocked indefinitely not banned, for suspected sockpuppets. This is Wikimedia Commons and follow the proper guidelines. You stated "There is a draft but it should be speedied very soon." That statement doesn't show any contributions to helping someone that's drafting but demonstrates encouragement for it to not be there. That shows biased toward the individual. You're on Wikimedia Commons and nominated for deletion for the images of that individual. That is not permitted in the guidelines. Georgivac (talk) 23:56, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Uploaded for the sole purpose of promotion of the subject and for no other purpose. Uploader is clearly acting on behalf of the subject and is therefore subject to a conflict of interest - already noted on his talk page on Wikipedia. Denial there is suspicious. In fact I hold the belief that this user is the subject concerned. There is no other way this information could have been acquired. Wikimedia in all respects is not a platform for promotion. 118.127.101.18 21:42, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- This is Wikimedia Commons not Wikipedia. Neither are a platform for promotion. Accusations without fact are slanderous and unacceptable. The image can be used for any articles about the subject and are on other pages. The page on Wikipedia was not deleted but declined for submission. It only needs additional information for improvement to get accepted. That is why the image is relevant to be kept. There is no COI as that was shown not to be. To accuse of WP:COI is absurd. Please read WP:AFG to understand and be civil in discussions. There were other editors that have contributed to the Wikipedia page for the last 5 years. Suspicions or opinions are not reasons for that on this nomination for deletion page. I've clearly demonstrated the reason to keep the image. I would like and admin to look into the following. There have been 5 different ip addresses targeting my contributions in Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons only. No other contributions. 118.127.101.18 is the newest one with no other contributions and trying to say the same thing as the other ip addresses. There are 4 of them that shows to be in the same area. Coincidence, not likely. The 4 started right before the page nominated for deletion here and the one on the Wikipedia page that was nominated for deletion, shown on the deletion page to delete as is on here, another page and deleted most of the Wikipedia page but was undone from another contributor and let the ip address user know that it was vandalism. The ip addresses needs to be looked into. Georgivac (talk) 22:54, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- The IP that made the above comment has a right to their opinion and it has validity. The article about the subject was deleted via AfD as not notable. There is no absurdity in the COI claim. It's valid. You are determined to maintain media about a person who is not notable. You haven't demonstrated why the image should be kept. You keep proving you want it kept for no good reason and reject the obvious. That Tony Ricca and his character the Pharoah is not notable. The images have no use as a result, and your block from Wikipedia is relevant as you were found to have socked in an effort to keep the article and for no other reason. You are panicking because you've been found out. I don't agree with the other IP about you actually being Ricca but that's beside the point here. 2001:8003:5999:6D00:14E2:939B:1F06:A880 04:13, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- This is Wikimedia Commons not Wikipedia. Neither are a platform for promotion. Accusations without fact are slanderous and unacceptable. The image can be used for any articles about the subject and are on other pages. The page on Wikipedia was not deleted but declined for submission. It only needs additional information for improvement to get accepted. That is why the image is relevant to be kept. There is no COI as that was shown not to be. To accuse of WP:COI is absurd. Please read WP:AFG to understand and be civil in discussions. There were other editors that have contributed to the Wikipedia page for the last 5 years. Suspicions or opinions are not reasons for that on this nomination for deletion page. I've clearly demonstrated the reason to keep the image. I would like and admin to look into the following. There have been 5 different ip addresses targeting my contributions in Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons only. No other contributions. 118.127.101.18 is the newest one with no other contributions and trying to say the same thing as the other ip addresses. There are 4 of them that shows to be in the same area. Coincidence, not likely. The 4 started right before the page nominated for deletion here and the one on the Wikipedia page that was nominated for deletion, shown on the deletion page to delete as is on here, another page and deleted most of the Wikipedia page but was undone from another contributor and let the ip address user know that it was vandalism. The ip addresses needs to be looked into. Georgivac (talk) 22:54, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
• Comment ADMIN, please advise Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia about look into the following. All ip addresses that are trying to remove images and everything I have uploaded and contributed to are possibly from the same area. Georgivac (talk) 00:47, 24 September 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Georgivac (talk • contribs) 00:41, 24 September 2019 (UTC) • Admin, please look at the following ip addresses as they might be from the same area (most likely from the same person when that is shown to be accurate as separate ip addresses are for the same purpose) 2001:8003:5999:6D00:14E2:939B:1F06:A880, 2001:8003:5999:6D00:1C33:A67C:6860:91CE and 118.127.101.18 Georgivac (talk) 20:46, 2 October 2019 (UTC) • Admin The following I'm not undoing but to bring to your attention: Latest revision as of 21:23, 2 October 2019 (edit) (undo) 2001:8003:5999:6d00:b5dd:cedf:c253:4630 (talk) (Undo revision 369144079 by Georgivac (talk) repeating the same thing again - irrelevant a second time (and I never said I wasn't the same person over the 2001 IP's - my IP changes constantly)) The following ip address 2001:8003:5999:6D00:14E2:939B:1F06:A880 made this statement "The IP that made the above comment has a right to their opinion and it has validity." The comment in the quotes show that it's an opinion from someone else but now states "(and I never said I wasn't the same person over the 2001 IP's - my IP changes constantly))" This shows it's the same person. The ip's used are only targeting my contributions. This now shows it's from one person and removing and undoing only my contributions on the images on here and contributions on Wikipedia. Georgivac (talk) 22:09, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- Oh boy you need help. I said that all the 2001 IP's were me. The other one is NOT me! Every time you comment you just make your attitude look even worse than it already is! I would have removed this as well, but this I'll leave because it shows my case against keeping these photos even more admirably! 2001:8003:5999:6D00:B5DD:CEDF:C253:4630 23:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- This page is to show why the image should be up as it is mentioned. You can go to my talk page for discussions. Do not remove as that would be vandalism. All 2001 ip's and other ones seem to be from the same area. Please sign in instead of using different addresses. Unless you don't want to reveal it. All of them are directed at my contributions. Georgivac (talk) 17:54, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- Ricca is not notable. There is no use for this and the other photos. That's the issue here and you have not proven it. You keep on bleating about him being notable and trying to undermine the case with irrelevant observations about me. Fact. He isn't notable. I don't have an account so I can't sign in. By the way, there are a couple of contributions you've made that I haven't touched. This is about Ricca's notability, not you - except in the matter of your socking on Wikipedia to try and keep the article over there (and failing) and your conflict of interest. 2001:8003:5999:6D00:A1CC:1DCF:D9CB:71A7 23:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- This page is to show why the image should be up as it is mentioned. You can go to my talk page for discussions. Do not remove as that would be vandalism. All 2001 ip's and other ones seem to be from the same area. Please sign in instead of using different addresses. Unless you don't want to reveal it. All of them are directed at my contributions. Georgivac (talk) 17:54, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- Oh boy you need help. I said that all the 2001 IP's were me. The other one is NOT me! Every time you comment you just make your attitude look even worse than it already is! I would have removed this as well, but this I'll leave because it shows my case against keeping these photos even more admirably! 2001:8003:5999:6D00:B5DD:CEDF:C253:4630 23:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
• Comment There is use for this image and others that you are trying to delete that Ricca is mentioned in and not from my contributions and that's enough proof. You are trying to remove many of my contributions as it shows. That's biased. I'm trying to be civil here and stating the facts. It's fishy that you don't have an account but want to delete from different ip's. You keep mentioning and mentioning not notable. In my opinion, that's a very obsessive pattern. Your dislike for the person is obvious. It wasn't ruled on Wikipedia that he's not notable. That's your opinion and some others but there are others that have shown that he is notable under WP:GNG. There's no dispute about it as it shows. You can mention it as much as you want but the truth is the truth. You have to understand the guidelines. You might and that's why you are using different ip's. Having an account we can have a conversation on talk as it shouldn't be done on here. There is no reason not to have an account unless you already do and you don't want to be seen as the reason could lead to vandalism and other abuses, my opinion. The other stuff you mentioned is laughable and redundant. Get an account so discussions can be done on talk not here. Be civil, not abusive on here. Georgivac (talk) 21:50, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- You're abusing the entire process by not telling the truth. The AfD on Wikipedia makes it crystal clear. Seven delete votes and only two valid keep votes, and one of them was sucking up to you (the other of course was you, and you tried twice hence your block for socking). The closing admin stated Even after improvements have been made to the article, the overall consensus is that the subject does not meet notability guidelines and that the coverage is typical of routine local news, insufficient to be of wider interest. Your opinion is against reality, which smacks of the very obsessive conduct you accuse me of. I start to see why the 118 IP thinks you are Ricca. I have every reason not to have an account. It's called my choice. Why would I need an account here when I can edit using my IP? You are still yet to prove he is notable and how the images have other uses, and I know why. Because you can't. 2001:8003:5999:6D00:F976:A7C7:4C84:48B8 23:26, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Outside the scope of WikiCommons under 2.2. No educational value demonstrated. Suggest to the 2001 IP that Wikipedia activity be left out of the argument. 1.152.108.116 05:06, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
- Actually, speaking of socking, I would like to see why the two voting IP addresses (2001 and 118, one home ip and one mobile ip) are from the same town in Austraila. Quakewoody (talk) 03:30, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- in fact, you can add a 3rd IP (1.152) from the same town in Austrailia when you look at the other nominations regarding the same person/subject. Quakewoody (talk) 03:56, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - Wikipedia is not WikiCommons which is not Wikidata. They all have different and separate rules and qualifications. Being blocked from editing or an article being found to be non-notable on Wikipedia does not carry over to the others. In fact, en.wikipedia is different than fr.wikipedia, which is different from pt.wikipedia. I am not active enough on commons to know if there is a reason to delete the image. But a COI does not apply. Quakewoody (talk) 03:46, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- Yes it does apply under promotional. The accusations of soc puppetry against me are denied as I do not have a mobile and the other is a different provider. The WP notes are relevant on the basis of the character of the uploader per the promotional conduct. 2001:8003:5999:6D00:D4D:B5BA:2D0A:3835 06:58, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- Unlike en.Wikipedia, self-promotion is not a "no no" on commons (assuming other criteria are met). Neither is COI. In fact, if you read the upload rules, one of the copyright permissions is "I own the image because I took it myself". How exactly are you going to post a picture of a subject matter if you took it yourself but aren't allowed to be the subject in question. Quakewoody (talk) 12:32, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- Look again at the rule the 1.152 IP linked. It specifically prohibits self-promotion. And that's COI by default. 2001:8003:5999:6D00:D4D:B5BA:2D0A:3835 21:56, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- Which is why I specified "assuming other criteria are met". Quakewoody (talk) 23:52, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- And 1.152 IDed why that's irrelevant. Not educational. 2001:8003:5999:6D00:F561:95E:11A6:9432 02:05, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- How is having an image of a WWE wrestler considered not educational? Quakewoody (talk) 11:39, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- He was not a WWE wrestler. 2001:8003:5999:6D00:84B3:33E1:629:5A26 13:09, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- Was it still WWF back then?Quakewoody (talk) 15:47, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- Irrelevant. He was not a contracted wrestler there. Ever. 2001:8003:5999:6D00:84B3:33E1:629:5A26 20:52, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- WWF changed to WWE. Same company. Don't forget they were WWWF and then WWF. Everyone that wrestled for either WWWF, WWF are WWE wrestlers. Ricca was a contracted wrestler for WWF. It doesn't have to be noted in Wikipedia. The offline newspapers mention it. They are local and regional newspapers and are notable. For the 2001, 118 and 1.152 ip's it seems to bother you about notability which he has. Wikipedia might have different standards but Google him and you can find a lot. If you're taking anything personal about him, don't take it out on my contributions. Any of this should be discussed in talk but you won't get an account to discuss? You have accused, I've only put my opinion in as it shows. I'm glad the ip's have been noticed to be all connected. There are more of these different ip's in Wikipedia that you have removed only for my contributions. You only do this for my contributions and are doing it for all of mine on here. This is deliberate and abusive. You need to be reported. One of your several ip's might be connected to an account and if it is, guidelines apply of course that is my opinion. There are many other pages that Ricca is listed in but didn't come from my contributions. Quakewoody is correct in the comment "Wikipedia is not WikiCommons which is not Wikidata. They all have different and separate rules and qualifications." Georgivac (talk) 22:23, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- Irrelevant. He was not a contracted wrestler there. Ever. 2001:8003:5999:6D00:84B3:33E1:629:5A26 20:52, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- Was it still WWF back then?Quakewoody (talk) 15:47, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- He was not a WWE wrestler. 2001:8003:5999:6D00:84B3:33E1:629:5A26 13:09, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- How is having an image of a WWE wrestler considered not educational? Quakewoody (talk) 11:39, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- And 1.152 IDed why that's irrelevant. Not educational. 2001:8003:5999:6D00:F561:95E:11A6:9432 02:05, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- Which is why I specified "assuming other criteria are met". Quakewoody (talk) 23:52, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- Look again at the rule the 1.152 IP linked. It specifically prohibits self-promotion. And that's COI by default. 2001:8003:5999:6D00:D4D:B5BA:2D0A:3835 21:56, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- Unlike en.Wikipedia, self-promotion is not a "no no" on commons (assuming other criteria are met). Neither is COI. In fact, if you read the upload rules, one of the copyright permissions is "I own the image because I took it myself". How exactly are you going to post a picture of a subject matter if you took it yourself but aren't allowed to be the subject in question. Quakewoody (talk) 12:32, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- Yes it does apply under promotional. The accusations of soc puppetry against me are denied as I do not have a mobile and the other is a different provider. The WP notes are relevant on the basis of the character of the uploader per the promotional conduct. 2001:8003:5999:6D00:D4D:B5BA:2D0A:3835 06:58, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
• Admin The two deletes and the nominate for deletion page for this image and all of my other images are coming from the same area and seemingly the same individual. @Quakewoody found ip's to be from the same town in Australia. Please follow up on these ip's. The nomination to delete should be removed.
- As pointed out on Wikidata for the deletion request there (by the same user with the same weak arguments), the word "town" is not the best to use in this situation, particularly since we are talking about another country's vernacular. But, when combined with editing history, the three IP addresses do come back to a location close enough to each other to skip suspicion, and just go straight to guilt. If not sock, then definitely meat or duck.Quakewoody (talk) 23:58, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: the image is clearly in scope on Commons as the subject is a former professional wrestler. That said, unfortunately the photo is a derivative work of the two other photos clearly visible and therefore not acceptable on Commons. A dropped version or a version where the two other photos were made unrecognizable would be ok, though. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 03:38, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
- Kept: After User:Alexis Jazz uploaded a blurred version of the file. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:33, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Renominating as the previous decision to keep was clearly incorrect. This file was for an article on Wikipedia that was deleted via AfD there and has no other use. Uploader has been blocked from WP for socking and is suspected of a conflict of interest. This is therefore self promotional and therefore outside the scope of this project. Subject is not a notable pro wrestler so there is no educational value. 2001:8003:5999:6D00:D9C7:5941:7D59:CD4 23:24, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:32, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Umesh kumar ahirwal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Collector damoh.jpg
- File:Umesh kumar ahirwal 1.jpg
- File:Umesh kumar ahirwal 4.jpg
- File:Umesh Kumar Ahirwal 2.jpg
- File:Umesh Kumar Ahirwal 3.jpg
- File:Umesh kumar ahirwal .jpg
- File:Umesh kumar ahirwal Batiyagarh.jpg
- File:Umesh kumar ahirwal.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:22, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Self-promotion, no contribs to any wm project. Commons is not facebook. --Achim (talk) 16:09, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
I change my mind 8195th (talk) 19:44, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; copyvio anyway per exif. --Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Paquito Gonzalez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-re images, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Megan Rain 2019.jpg
- File:Abella Danger 2019 blonde.jpg
- File:Abella Danger 2019.jpg
- File:Skyla Novea 2019.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:35, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio, found on web. --Gbawden (talk) 06:41, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Clearly not a free image; note watermark. Source is subject's Facebook page. General Ization (talk) 23:52, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; feel free to nom for speedy deletion next time. --Gbawden (talk) 07:02, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Comitefolmer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted work by Georges Folmer (d. 1977), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:FOLMER 0291-cat807 C - copie.tif
- File:FOLMER 0301-cat852 C - copie.tif
- File:FOLMER 0325-cat195 C - copie.tif
- File:FOLMER 0341-cat670 C - copie.tif
- File:FOLMER 0392-cat336 T - copie.tif
- File:FOLMER 1080-cat829 C - copie.tif
- File:FOLMER photo07 S - copie.tif
- File:FOLMER LucideContour-cat467 F - copie.tif
- File:Georges Folmer-En tout a le soleil frappe la nudite.jpg
- File:FOLMER 0619-cat092 N - copie.tif
- File:FOLMER 0959-cat115 S - copie.tif
- File:FOLMER 0934-cat058 C - copie.tif
- File:FOLMER 0916-cat037 N - copie.tif
- File:FOLMER 0931-cat017 C - copie.tif
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:37, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Comitefolmer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted work by Georges Folmer (d. 1977), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:OUJKI.jpg
- File:NYHUI.jpg
- File:Mfzenkf.tif
- File:LOLPLOI.jpg
- File:KUHYTG.jpg
- File:JJUHKM.tif
- File:IYHGVFD.png
- File:HLIOJNG.tif
- File:GILJKJM.jpg
- File:FYHKGKU.jpg
- File:EGKGH.jpg
- File:DFYFCHF.jpg
- File:CHUHGJ?GVHJ.jpg
- File:BAYGDZAJB.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:42, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:54, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Comitefolmer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted work by Georges Folmer (d. 1977), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:31, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:54, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
This is a logo of SpinLaunch, Inc. but the user who posted it claims that it's original work. This claim seems dubious. There is a fair-use version of the logo at File:Spinlaunch.jpg Hadron137 (talk) 04:10, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 06:55, 17 Oktober 2019 UTC: This logo was uploaded to commons by mistake and needs to be removed and replaced --Krdbot 13:00, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
existing file with history: ja:ファイル:Syokupan.jpg should be moved to commons. Hongthay (talk) 17:52, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Merged. --4nn1l2 (talk) 10:23, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Helen Wang Fundraising 2.jpg
- File:Helen Wang Fundraising 1.jpg
- File:Helen Wang Fundraising 18.jpg
- File:Helen Wang Fundraising 17.jpg
- File:Helen Wang Fundraising 16.jpg
- File:Helen Wang Fundraising 15.jpg
- File:Helen Wang Fundraising 14.jpg
- File:Helen Wang Fundraising 13.jpg
- File:Helen Wang Fundraising 12.jpg
- File:Helen Wang Fundraising 3.jpg
- File:Helen Wang Fundraising 11.jpg
- File:Helen Wang Fundraising 10.jpg
- File:Helen Wang Fundraising 7.jpg
- File:Helen Wang Fundraising 8.jpg
- File:Helen Wang Fundraising 6.jpg
- File:Helen Wang Fundraising 9.jpg
- File:Helen Wang Fundraising 4.jpg
- File:Helen Wang Fundraising 5.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:15, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Superseded by File:Mae Carol Jemison.jpg. Coffeeandcrumbs (talk) 22:47, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Doesn't quality for Dupe speedy deletion, but obvious case of same photograph of superior quality. — Huntster (t @ c) 23:07, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete This small resolution version may be out of scope. --Ras67 (talk) 10:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:04, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 07:06, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:31, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work of the uploader. jdx Re: 10:58, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
resolución de imagen deficiente Ahtsgdf (talk) 12:10, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: uploaders request shortly after upload. --JuTa 06:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
resolucion insuficiente de la imagen Ahtsgdf (talk) 12:15, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: uploaders request shortly after upload. --JuTa 06:38, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
resolucion de la imagen es insatisfactoria Ahtsgdf (talk) 12:17, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: uploaders request shortly after upload. --JuTa 06:36, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
resolucion de imagen insatisfactoria Ahtsgdf (talk) 12:19, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: uploaders request shortly after upload. --JuTa 06:37, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Иван Лапин 2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos of photos. Please modify with the real dates of shooting and explain why images are public domain in Russia.
- File:GerasimovVS.jpg
- File:Соснов Иван Дмитриевич.jpg
- File:Саламбеков Борис Константинович.jpg
- File:Березовский Михаил Владимирович.jpg
- File:Пассек Александр Николаевич.jpg
- File:Berezovsky MV.jpg
- File:Гастев Владимир Алексеевич.jpg
- File:Арнольд Владимир Владимирович.jpg
- File:Парфёнов, Дионисий Фёдорович.jpg
- File:Амелин Степан Васильевич.jpg
- File:907718 original.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:00, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:16, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Because it is Blurry The Neoplan Rider Studios (talk) 19:36, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: nonsense nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:14, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:58, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 15:15, 20 Oktober 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Иван Лапин 2 --Krdbot 18:58, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Posh James Peechatt (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:54, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --1989 (talk) 16:24, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Posh James Peechatt (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Posh James Peechatt.jpg
- File:PhotoEditor 20191011 070121777.jpg
- File:PhotoEditor 20190920 235245556.jpg
- File:IMG-20191012-WA0008.jpg
- File:Posh Peechatt.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:40, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 08:15, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Per File:Dr Hemal with family.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:06, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:15, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Source file has been deleted following Commons:Deletion requests/File:Coronation of HM King Norodom Suramarit and of HM Queen Sisowath Kossamak.jpg Thuresson (talk) 22:49, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:15, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Source file has been deleted following Commons:Deletion requests/File:Coronation of HM King Norodom Suramarit and of HM Queen Sisowath Kossamak.jpg Thuresson (talk) 22:50, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:15, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
This image not represented the seminary located in Chemmad. I think the image is the front side of new buildings of Tirurangadi Muslim Orphanage. Kutyava (talk) 03:56, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep until English Wikipedia stops using it on en:Darul Huda Islamic University (COM:NPOV). --bjh21 (talk) 14:26, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: A wrong description is not a reason for deletion. If the description is wrong, please correct it and also move the image to an appropriate new file name. Otherwise, this image seems to be fine. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:23, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Pexels's CC0 license was revoked since July 2018 A1Cafel (talk) 03:56, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- A1Cafel, can you tell me where I can find more informationi about Pexels' CC0 license being revoked? Kolya Butternut (talk) 01:15, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Levivich, do you know anything about this? Kolya Butternut (talk) 01:17, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Kolya Butternut, yeah, see the note at {{Pexels-Cc-zero}}. They changed their license July 5, 2018, so Pexels photos have to have a publication date prior to that to be used here. You might contact the author, though, for permission; I bet she'd like one of her photos to be used at w:Woman. Levivich (talk) 01:30, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Levivich, hmph, I don't see any contact information for her. Kolya Butternut (talk) 02:04, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Kolya Butternut, yeah, see the note at {{Pexels-Cc-zero}}. They changed their license July 5, 2018, so Pexels photos have to have a publication date prior to that to be used here. You might contact the author, though, for permission; I bet she'd like one of her photos to be used at w:Woman. Levivich (talk) 01:30, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: As this image apparently was published after Pexels changed their license, it was never available under CC0. Can be restored, of course, if the creator is contacted and if they agree to give an appropriate free license. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:27, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Pexels's CC0 license was revoked since July 2018 A1Cafel (talk) 03:56, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: As this image apparently was published after Pexels changed their license, it was never available under CC0. Can be restored, of course, if the creator is contacted and if they agree to give an appropriate free license. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:28, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Pexels's CC0 license was revoked since July 2018 A1Cafel (talk) 04:03, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Ah. Good catch. My mistake. Delete GMGtalk 11:39, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: As this image apparently was published after Pexels changed their license, it was never available under CC0. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:29, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Pexels's CC0 license was revoked since July 2018 A1Cafel (talk) 04:13, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: As this image apparently was published after Pexels changed their license, it was never available under CC0. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:30, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
obviously not simple geometric shapes or text, likely COPYVIO Thespoondragon (talk) 04:48, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:58, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 00:52, 22 Oktober 2019 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) Media without a license as of 13 October 2019 --Krdbot 06:56, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 00:53, 22 Oktober 2019 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) Media without a license as of 13 October 2019 --Krdbot 06:56, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
porque le falta autor,lincencia no valida y trabajo propio Estefano 442 (talk) 14:33, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 07:52, 22 Oktober 2019 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) Media missing permission as of 13 October 2019 --Krdbot 12:55, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
I change my mind 8195th (talk) 19:46, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 07:53, 22 Oktober 2019 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) Media missing permission as of 13 October 2019 --Krdbot 12:56, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dinesh attry (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE (en:User:Dinesh attry). Besides, unlikely to be own works since uploader is pictured in.
- File:Dinesh attry talking about painting with his friends in his studio Shimla,.jpg
- File:Dinesh attry in-studio,.jpg
- File:Dinesh attry in his studio, Shimla,.jpg
- File:Dinesh attry working in his studio, Shimla.jpg
- File:Dinesh attry with his College Teacher, Anjana Bhardwaj.jpg
- File:Dinesh attry ,.jpg
- File:Profile pic png.png
- File:PKK 8460.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:52, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:53, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Es wurde ein falsches Bild hochgeladen. W. Bulach (talk) 16:41, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ccvail1455 (talk · contribs)
[edit](Sorry french) pas de mention explicite de la licence sur le site d'où provient ces images. Merci aussi de supprimer la catégorie Kylie Rae aussi une fois celle ci vide.
- File:Kylie Rae in ring taunting to the crowd.jpg
- File:Kylie Rae wins the AAW Womens Championship.jpg
- File:Kylie Rae celebrates winning the AAW Womens Championship.jpg
Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 20:45, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Pexels's CC0 license was revoked since July 2018. Image posted afterwards doens't meet COM:L A1Cafel (talk) 09:16, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:32, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Unused low-resolution object without meaningful description, probably gameplay screen grab Keith Edkins (talk) 14:35, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:33, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and no license since 13 October 2019. --Green Giant (talk) 22:45, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all. --JuTa 02:46, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all. --JuTa 02:48, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all. --JuTa 02:47, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Don't know if "Rechtenvrije Foto's" is a sufficient permission for Commons. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:54, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- I think it is sufficient. The reason the city publishes these photo's on its website is to allow anyone to use these pictures. "Rechtenvrije Foto's" translates to "Photos Free of Rights". Sanderflight (talk) 15:13, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio with rationale "No permission since 13 October 2019". Non-admin closure. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:48, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
it was an error Pacopac (talk) 17:06, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Ymblanter. Non-admin closure. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:50, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
it was an error Pacopac (talk) 17:08, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Ymblanter. Non-admin closure. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:51, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
uploader is not the creator and therefore does not have the copyright Gouwenaar (talk) 12:32, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Still in discussion with the maintainer of the archive about the correct owner and rights. Can be deleted for now.--HansNouwens (talk) 14:34, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:17, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
fake license, a modern work, was transferred from the Russian Wikipedia where the uploaded user was indefinitely blocked for systematic copyright infringement Testus (talk) 14:32, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:23, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
This user is not the owner of the logo. Copyright violation.
Nxgen. (talk) 19:31, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:25, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:38, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Stop trying to get all of my photos deleted. I have every right to post them; they are mine that I myself took. "Unlikely to be own work." I put, in the description, that it is blurry on purpose. Additionally, I stated that I take photographs of XCORPIIIO. This is seriously all unnecessary.
Deleted: Can't see it's within scope plus nom reason. --Herby talk thyme 11:27, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
An unused and randomly categorised image. Looks like an advertisement. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 09:39, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:29, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
The uploaded logo is copyrighted from online. It has been incorrectly labelled as the author's 'own work' and there has been no permission to upload the logo from the user. Jude999 (talk) 12:39, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:30, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyright Violation (DC Comics, Warner Bros Animation) ; Fair use forbidden on Commons Tylwyth Eldar (talk) 12:57, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:30, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
low quality photo Mindmatrix 13:09, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:31, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
This has been uploaded as an advertisement rather than a useful image Keith Edkins (talk) 13:22, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:31, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ŠMotorsport (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possibly a complex logo per COM:TOO Czech Republic. Logo is unique enough to be protected ("a unique outcome of the creative activity of the author").
- File:ŠKODA Motorsport - logo menší.png
- File:Logo ŠKODA Motorsport - malé.png
- File:ŠKODA Motorsport - logo.png
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:24, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ŠMotorsport (talk · contribs)
[edit]Permission from their respective copyright holders/authors needed via OTRS
- File:ŠKODA FABIA R5 evo.jpg
- File:ŠKODA Octavia WRC.jpg
- File:160927-popular-mc-1-jpg.jpg
- File:151027-l-k-voiturette-a-1905-017.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:54, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; copyvios. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ŠMotorsport (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:32, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Turtle Entertainment
[edit]Album covers. Yasu (talk) 14:56, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:32, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mubark almubark (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:33, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:34, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gusdhjtrkal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Random copyrighted images.
- File:Mocasines.jpg
- File:Estatuilla de oro y plata.jpg
- File:Camélido spondylus.jpg
- File:Capacocha.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:31, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:34, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:29, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake 58.145.190.243 16:45, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Ymblanter: I can't tell if this ever existed? I'll defer to you here. (I'm NACing already deleted pages/files that are still open). --TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:54, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Appears to have gone. --Herby talk thyme 12:30, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Werbeflyer, kein Artikel verwendet die Datei Regi51 (talk) 17:25, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Advert or whatever. --Herby talk thyme 12:30, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 大诺史 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:35, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:31, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Low resolution. Metadata shows that the file was sourced from Facebook Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:36, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:31, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Low resolution. Metadata shows that the file was sourced from Facebook Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:36, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:32, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:36, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:32, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:36, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:33, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Low resolution. Metadata shows that the file was sourced from Facebook Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:37, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:33, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian -out of scope --Alaa :)..! 18:53, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:34, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LaviniusHispanus (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Lorenzo Peña 2019-09-24.png
- File:Lorenzo Peña 2019-10-01.png
- File:Lorenzo Peña 2019-10-08.png
- File:Lorenzo Peña on his publicly displayed video, 2019-07-30.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:37, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Please, Patrick, can you be specific about why those files are outside Commons:Scope? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LaviniusHispanus (talk • contribs) 15:30, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- @LaviniusHispanus: You're right: Lorenzo Peña is within scope; I've changed the rationale. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:17, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 02:04, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LaviniusHispanus (talk · contribs)
[edit]Screenshots. "Lorenzo" as author in EXIF.
- File:Lorenzo Peña 2019-09-24.png
- File:Lorenzo Peña 2019-10-01.png
- File:Lorenzo Peña 2019-10-08.png
- File:Lorenzo Peña on his publicly displayed video, 2019-07-30.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:18, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Is "Lorenzo" mentioned as an author in the EXIF of File:Lorenzo Peña on his publicly displayed video, 2019-07-30.png ? I doubt it. Anyway I am the creator of the photographs I can try to delete the EXIF in those photographs, but editing metadata in PNG files is far from easy Yours faithfully Lavinius Hispanus — Preceding unsigned comment added by LaviniusHispanus (talk • contribs) 16:48, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- You are not intended to remove the EXIF files. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:54, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Then what can I do? I am afraid I have got no control over the EXIF metadata Yours faithfully Lavinius Hispanus — Preceding unsigned comment added by LaviniusHispanus (talk • contribs) 17:07, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Gone. --Herby talk thyme 12:49, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Potential copyright violation; almost certainly not own work. Anaglyphic (talk) 01:19, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:45, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Image shows packaging of a named brand of milk. This must be trademarked and copyright. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:01, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:PACKAGING. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:46, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Inferior duplicate of File:Kharaharapriya_scale.svg Mahir256 (talk) 03:15, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Please give a more specific link A1Cafel (talk) 04:15, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Probably https://www.pexels.com/photo/light-nature-sunset-clouds-96491/ but poor quality. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused illustration without meaningful description, doubtful if this is own work Keith Edkins (talk) 14:36, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyrightviolation Alinea (talk) 20:17, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
You want to delete the above mentioned file claiming without evidence a copyright would be infringed as far as it may concern the painting “Nighthawks” in the background.
[edit]Please read the attached notice first as well as the attached comment on licenceː
Roland Arhelger (talk) 01:24, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep I see no copyright problems. Even in europe the depiction of "Night Hawks" can be assessed as {{de minimis}}. I've recreated Roland Arhelger's own licence for the image's correct licensing. --Ras67 (talk) 18:50, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:01, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Three different images by three different users.
- Gumot's revision was only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in September 2010 as having no content.
- Laky 1970's revision is essentially a copy of File:Logo of TV SLO 1 HD (2012-).png, except this upload does not have a transparent background.
- Udeepak1991's revision is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality and is likely copyrighted. ƏXPLICIT 01:32, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Treat it the same way as File:Index.jpg, that is delete and apply create protection. Generic title, won't be useful. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 14:38, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:27, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Please give a more specific link A1Cafel (talk) 04:11, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: File has been deleted as a duplicate of File:Taipei, Taiwan (Unsplash rQPbNJSNueg).jpg. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:31, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
i change my mind 8195th (talk) 19:34, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deletion requested by uploader within 7 days of uploading. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:22, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
i change mu mind 8195th (talk) 19:36, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deletion requested by uploader within 7 days of uploading. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:21, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
i change mu mind 8195th (talk) 19:36, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deletion requested by uploader within 7 days of uploading. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:21, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
i change mu mind 8195th (talk) 19:37, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deletion requested by uploader within 7 days of uploading. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:21, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
i change mu mind 8195th (talk) 19:37, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deletion requested by uploader within 7 days of uploading. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:20, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
i change my mind 8195th (talk) 19:39, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deletion requested by uploader within 7 days of uploading. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:19, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
i change my mind 8195th (talk) 19:40, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deletion requested by uploader within 7 days of uploading. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:19, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Nominate for deletion 8195th (talk) 19:41, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deletion requested by uploader within 7 days of uploading. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:19, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Nominate for deletion 8195th (talk) 19:41, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deletion requested by uploader within 7 days of uploading. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:18, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
I change my mind 8195th (talk) 19:47, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deletion requested by uploader within 7 days of uploading. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:18, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
i change my mind 8195th (talk) 19:43, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deletion requested by uploader within 7 days of uploading. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:12, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
I change my mind 8195th (talk) 19:44, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deletion requested by uploader within 7 days of uploading. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:12, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
I change my mind 8195th (talk) 19:50, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deletion requested by uploader within 7 days of uploading. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:11, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
I change my mind 8195th (talk) 19:47, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deletion requested by uploader within 7 days of uploading. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:10, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
I change my mind 8195th (talk) 19:50, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deletion requested by uploader within 7 days of uploading. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:10, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
obviously not simple geometric shapes or text, likely COPYVIO Thespoondragon (talk) 04:47, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:36, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
obviously not simple geometric shapes or text, likely COPYVIO Thespoondragon (talk) 04:47, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:36, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
obviously not simple geometric shapes or text, likely COPYVIO Thespoondragon (talk) 04:48, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:37, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
obviously not simple geometric shapes or text, likely COPYVIO Thespoondragon (talk) 04:48, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:37, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
obviously not simple geometric shapes or text, likely COPYVIO Thespoondragon (talk) 04:48, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:37, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
not-notable, self-promotion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ukiraneis (talk • contribs) 2019-10-06T15:03:30 (UTC)
Kept: User is (semi-) active user on our projects. Can keep a (few) personal images to be used on user pages. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:41, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Archivo personal no usada. Usuaria también pide el borrado. 186.172.214.139 01:48, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Yes I know it was previously kept, but the initial request for deletion came from the person depicted. I see no indication this is a selfie, therefore the uploader may be aware of the copyright issue belonging to someone else. In either case as it was not in use, and uploader request, and a personal image, I deleted it. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Portrait of a non-notable person. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:26, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Barbaros Gonençgil is the vice-president of the International Geographical Union, the most important geographical society in the world, founded in 1922 [1], professor at Istanbul University, the most prominent university in Turkey as you know.
- This picture is the one and only in the Category:Geographers_from_Turkey. There is no Turkish geographer either in this category [2]. This is obviously a major gap on Wikipedia. Or shall we assume that there are no valuable geographers in Turkey ? If there are, Barbaros Gonençgil is the one. By the way, the 34th International Geographical Congress will be held in Istanbul in 2020 and Barbaros Gonençgil will be the Head of the Scientific Committee [3]. Whom else would you suggest as a notable Turkish geographer ?
- Regards, Ji-Elle (talk) 06:56, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter who he is, it matters if he is notable enough to have a Wikipedia article. Seems like he is not.--Nanahuatl (talk) 18:29, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Notable at Wikidata (Barbaros Gonençgil (Q75535625)). --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:52, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
{{NoFoP-Russia}} AntonioK talk 06:52, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:07, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Source given indicates image is from Reuters; No evidence given for author; URL given in permission field does not confirm CC-by-sa license. Ariadacapo (talk) 07:01, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:04, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
no way to guess to which country or parties this may correspond to. c:File:My Parliament.svg is available for testing. Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 15:04, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted. Not in use; uploader has not made any Wikimedia contributions outside Commons. Thuresson (talk) 21:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
no way to guess to which country or parties this may correspond to. c:File:My Parliament.svg is available for testing. Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 15:05, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted. Not in use; uploader has not made any Wikimedia contributions outside Commons. Thuresson (talk) 21:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Without source or publication data, cannot determine copyright status Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:11, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted. Thuresson (talk) 21:26, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Without source or publication data, cannot determine copyright status Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:12, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 21:27, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Without original source or publication data, cannot determine copyright status Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:13, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted, no source or publication data to explain why Japanese copyright law is relevant here. Thuresson (talk) 21:30, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted. An article about the subject was deleted from Danish Wikipedia for being out of scope. Thuresson (talk) 22:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Tagged as {{PD-textlogo}}, but the combination of elements clearly push the logo above the threshold of originality. See also COM:TOO Czech Republic.
ƏXPLICIT 00:59, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:38, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
- the photograph has no historical, educational value, the author was too lazy to put the location. It’s impossible to understand anything by Description
akalan_68@hotmail.com alone. It is just a sea of nothing more.--Ayratayrat (talk) 17:05, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- The categories say this is Izmir in Turkey. A Commons user who knows the area should be able to pinpoint the exact location. Thuresson (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept per Thuresson. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for posters in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:48, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; DW. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:41, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BevinKacon as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Perhaps may be de minimis for the screen. A1Cafel (talk) 10:24, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:42, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused hypothetical alternative to File:Chambre des Communes 1979.png Mahir256 (talk) 02:37, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:47, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
photo de mauvaise qualité 109.209.57.11 08:46, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: good enough quality, at least most of the image. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:40, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
image en mauvais état 2A01:CB00:8387:7E00:E861:9C27:B0AD:D585 07:03, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no alternative at that time. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Muslimbek07
[edit]All files uploaded by the user appear to be taken from http://assia.info. There is no evidence that they are released under a suitable license (I really tried hard to find any mention at the site, but with no success). In particular, refer to the ones below:
- File:Гунделен.jpg originally can be found here: page, direct link to file. Importantly, the same photo in higher resolution is used in the image slider on the main page of the site (direct link to the file), and there exists an archived version dated back to 2015 (3+ years earlier than the upload date).
- File:Бедык.jpg originally can be found here: page, direct link to file.
- File:Нейтрино.jpg originally can be found here: page, direct link to file.
- and more…
It would be great if someone with OTRS permissions can try to contact the organization at assiafond@mail.ru and ask for permission before actually deleting the files, since currently there are no alternatives for them at Commons. DmitTrix (talk) 09:01, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Image of plain-text table, replaced by wikitable at id:wikt:diet. DMacks (talk) 09:03, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:54, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/insource:flickr.com/people/68711844
[edit]Serial license laundering account, just a dump of food wallpaper images taken from web.
- Nearly all lack any camera data
- Few descriptions or titles given, even though they are very high quality images
- Many are watermarked to different sources
- File:Wall Food 10474 (15638858980).jpg & File:Wall Food 10472 (15637894719).jpg & File:Wall Food 10477 (15203734544).jpg bottom right watermark, case 1
- File:Wall Food 10428 (15204283563).jpg bottom right watermark, case 2
- File:Wall Food 10481 (15821823831).jpg & File:Wall Food 10486 (15203733774).jpg meta data showing it's been lifted from another wallpaper site, case 3
- File:Wall Food 10438 (15825262692).jpg seems to be posted at [4], currently holds Featured status at Chinese Wikipedia
- File:Wall Food 10434 (15638860860).jpg Google searching this image shows a far higher resolution is available at 4762x3456
- File:Meatballs sandwich10000000041678 000334 (15638892980).jpg & File:Coulant 10000000041662 000639 (15823743875).jpg unexplaied low resolution, for high quality photo
Upon deletion, closing admin to update User:FlickreviewR/bad-authors with 68711844@N07.
- File:Wall Food 10438 (15825262692).jpg
- File:Fruit juices 10000000041825 001600 (15637931149).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10474 (15638858980).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10006 (15825260212).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10242 (15800087736).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10435 (15800057056).jpg
- File:Coffee 10000000041876 001200 (15638573727).jpg
- File:Coffee croissants 10000000041824 001600 (15825297992).jpg
- File:Meat 10000000041669 000680 (15204315233).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10063 (15204308613).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10418 (15638298258).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10458 (15638899120).jpg
- File:Gummi bears 10000000042399 001080 (15638333278).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10481 (15821823831).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10421 (15203736794).png
- File:Wall Food 10428 (15204283563).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10451 (15638860180).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10020 (15638890890).jpg
- File:Noodle soup 10000000041674 001024 (15638328528).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10454 (15825261882).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10449 (15637895469).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10070 (15637920279).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10066 (15638321958).jpg
- File:Sushi 10000000041675 001600 (15638892750).jpg
- File:Bagel 10000000041671 000715 (15638892520).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10036 (15821854281).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10433 (15204283533).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10437 (15821825851).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10441 (15203736124).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10457 (15825261852).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10042 (15825290182).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10468 (15638859210).jpg
- File:Vegetables 10000000041865 001080 (15638897400).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10035 (15800085246).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10422 (15638335398).jpg
- File:Pizza mushrooms 10000000041823 001024 (15800089226).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10430 (15821826221).jpg
- File:Hamburger 10000000041715 001080 (15637928889).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10484 (15637894059).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10034 (15823740895).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10447 (15637895499).png
- File:Wall Food 10477 (15203734544).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10455 (15825261872).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10497 (15825301822).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10419 (15637896749).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10048 (15800083686).jpg
- File:Honey being drizzled onto buttered pancakes.jpg
- File:Wall Food 10461 (15204282023).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10245 (15204314443).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10056 (15825288372).jpg
- File:Meat 10000000041670 001200 (15638569197).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10479 (15823711475).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10453 (15825261892).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10067 (15638885960).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10055 (15823738475).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10068 (15825287272).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10019 (15823742765).jpg
- File:Sushi 10000000041679 001080 (15800088606).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10472 (15637894719).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10489 (15825300172).jpg
- File:Meats 10000000041677 001270 (15638569567).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10018 (15825293032).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10490 (15638295088).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10093 (15638560407).jpg
- File:Meatballs sandwich10000000041678 000334 (15638892980).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10485 (15825260912).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10456 (15821863691).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10434 (15638860860).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10464 (15204281873).jpg
- File:Coulant 10000000041662 000639 (15823743875).jpg
- File:Sausages 10000000041683 000788 (15823745245).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10016 (15637926459).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10015 (15825293872).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10423 (15637934209).jpg
- File:Steak 10000000041661 000768 (15825293982).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10044 (15821853061).jpg
- File:Whiskey Banner.jpg
- File:Grilled meat 10000000041676 001200 (15638892780).jpg
- File:Vegetables 10000000041826 001200 (15637931389).png
- File:Wall Food 10488 (15203733404).jpg
- File:Oranges 10000000042219 001200 (15823748865).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10425 (15637934219).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10478 (15800055166).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10444 (15638860170).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10426 (15203736724).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10476 (15800055256).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10462 (15203735154).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10440 (15821825451).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10427 (15638861150).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10061 (15203761444).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10439 (15203735904).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10033 (15203764374).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10057 (15823738285).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10021 (15821855591).jpg
- File:Sausages 10000000041682 001200 (15823745205).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10420 (15204283803).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10246 (15203766574).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10450 (15823750225).jpg
- File:Beer 10000000042291 001600 (15825299612).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10473 (15637894679).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10446 (15825262002).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10064 (15823737865).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10466 (15823712165).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10486 (15203733774).jpg
- File:Wall Food 10062 (15638322138).jpg
BevinKacon (talk) 09:22, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Not much to add here. I used a banner image from one of these in completely good faith, but if they are in violation then no issue to remove. Andrewssi2 (talk) 04:36, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:01, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Probable copyvio, this is a corporate logo with no evidence that the company has released it under a CC licence Keith Edkins (talk) 13:09, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:04, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Michalmarekart (talk · contribs)
[edit]First, there is no evidence that the user has the right to freely license these works by an apparently living artist. Second, it is not clear that the artist meets our requirements for notability -- A Google search on "Michal Marek" yields no relevant hits on the first page.
- File:Michal marek.jpg
- File:Žebrák 2014.jpg
- File:Adam na jiné planetě.jpg
- File:Marion portrét.jpg
- File:3000 po.nl.jpg
- File:Osamělá hora.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:04, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Bad name Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 13:32, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - it can be renamed if necessary. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:06, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created March 2006. No Permission from the sculptor Микола Мірошниченко / architect Віктор Кільчицький. Микола Василечко (talk) 14:22, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:06, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 1990. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 14:25, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:08, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Because it is A selfie 171.247.128.27 15:22, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- It is a memorable cross at the Church of Saints Peter and Paul in Ledeč nad Sázavou, Czech Republic. It is not selfie! --Anaj7 (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. Its not a selfie but cross. It is in the scope of the project. Juandev (talk) 19:07, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. The photo was made during the Photoworkshop organuized by Wikimedia Czech Republic, as seen in the template included, there are other photos of the object in the category. --Czeva (talk) 17:07, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. Baseless request. --Xth-Floor (talk) 19:20, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:10, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Canada for 2-D works. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:38, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:12, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
license violation: the uploader (user Muffelmann) is not the creator of the image (Sabin Welte) Mikmaq (talk) 21:56, 13 October 2019 (UTC) You do not now if this is the same people. --2003:CE:9713:DA00:BA:7D6E:5C14:1F51 13:32, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
CC-Lizenz geht aus der Quelle nicht hervor; abgesehen davon ist der Autor falsch angegeben. 2001:16B8:45ED:5700:B8D0:5494:C392:E8AD 13:45, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:50, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
I (as the owner) am not anymore satisfied with this image being online. I'd like it removed. TatraTram 15:22, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 13:50, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
I want to remove this image I made as there are privacy concerns to it. TatraTram 20:32, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 01:06, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Photo was removed, cannot prove copyright status, since Pexels's CC0 license was revoked since July 2018 A1Cafel (talk) 04:19, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep – Photo was uploaded to Pexels prior to July 2018, and CC0 license is therefore valid. Senator2029 21:23, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Do you have any proof? --A1Cafel (talk) 06:58, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- You have not demonstrated that I did anything wrong. All required information was accurately documented when the file was uploaded. Senator2029 16:00, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
- Do you have any proof? --A1Cafel (talk) 06:58, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: license was not reviewed. Also arguably out of scope - this is basically a stock photo without particularly educational or historical value. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:53, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Photo was removed, cannot prove copyright status, since Pexels's CC0 license was revoked since July 2018 A1Cafel (talk) 09:39, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep – Photo was uploaded to Pexels prior to July 2018, and CC0 license is therefore valid. Senator2029 21:20, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Do you have any proof? --A1Cafel (talk) 06:59, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- You have not demonstrated that I did anything wrong. All required information was accurately documented when the file was uploaded. Senator2029 16:01, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
- Do you have any proof? --A1Cafel (talk) 06:59, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Senator2029: Uploaders should not verify their own uploads, that’s COM:L 101: «Reviews by image-reviewers on their own uploads will be considered invalid.» You should have added {{License review}} to the file page and let someone else confirm the original license. That’s what you did wrong — and of course this discussion is not about what you did wrong, anyway, but about whether this image, as it is, is suitable for Commons: And as it is, sadly, it’s not. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:57, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
- Strike that: Although the original source fell to linkrot, archive.org kept a copy. Therefore, the photo should be
. (Creating an archived backup, upon upload, or researching it now, upon DR, is what you should have done, instead of the above.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:01, 25 October 2019 (UTC){{vk|kept}}
- @Tuvalkin: The archive is from 2019 and not from before they changed the license in July 2018. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:14, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- The archiving date by itself would be immaterial, as what is of interest to us is the upload date as declared on the archived page. That is «24 May 15:54» (year not indicated because Pexels is too cool for that); I had assumed this to be May 2018, therefore before the cut date, based on the notion that Senator2029 had uploaded this photo into Commons on July 11th, 2018, still before the cut date and therefore still good for Commons — the only issue here being the lack of {{License review}}. However, I noticed now that the upload date was July 11th, 2019, instead: Well after the cut date and contextualizing the ambiguous publishing date at Pexels as May 2019 also in view of the archival date, as noted by Josve05a. This file is therefore unsuitable for Commons as per Pexels’ changed license. It is now demonstrated what Senator2029 did wrong, and it’s more than it seemed at first. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 19:30, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, sadly. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 02:04, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
- Strike that: Although the original source fell to linkrot, archive.org kept a copy. Therefore, the photo should be
Nobody here in this discussion has ever written to say anything positive, but you sure have a lot to say now. Go ahead and delete it, at this point what do I care a file compared what’s thought of me. I spend untold hours editing here and Wikipedia, taking extreme care to do everything as correctly as possible. Now, you all want to to pile on and assume the worst in me. Senator2029 20:33, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
- Cheer up, everybody makes mistakes. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 02:04, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Senator, as Tuvalkin noted, no one is claiming you did anything wrong here. External sources that change their licenses are a tricky matter, and sometimes it ends up with cases like this where it's not possible to independently verify the license. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:58, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Pexels's CC0 license was revoked since July 2018 A1Cafel (talk) 09:23, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:31, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Photo was removed, cannot prove copyright status, since Pexels's CC0 license was revoked since July 2018 A1Cafel (talk) 09:42, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:30, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
The photo came from Panoramio. The watermark suggest a possible license laundering.
- File:Estación Mamá Tingó (Metro De Santo Domingo) - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Estación Mamá Tingó (Metro De Santo Domingo) - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Estación Mamá Tingó (Metro De Santo Domingo) - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Estación Mamá Tingó (Metro De Santo Domingo) - panoramio.jpg
Ymblanter (talk) 11:24, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:31, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
all uses in wikipedia have been replaced by TeX; no need to keep this image Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:00, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:32, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Sign includes a non-free logo, therefore not CC-eligible Kissa21782 (talk) 19:39, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:32, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
This purports to be a *historical* flag of Afghan tribes associated with the Durrani empire, but it is clearly a hoax: a) no sources are provided, b) the flag incorporates the 20th-century emblem of Afghanistan, which is rather unlikely to have been known to the 18th-century Durrani empire, and finally c) the 'tree' design is clearly lifted from the Numenorean flags in 'Lord of the Rings', just search for 'white tree second age'. I even seem to remember templates for such pennants with the tree design for use with Games Workshop miniatures. This is so obvious a self-invented flag as to beggar belief that it has gone undetected for so long, and given its widespread use as authentic across various WP projects, it should be removed. Constantine ✍ 20:57, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- PS, same applies to the png version. Constantine ✍ 20:58, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Cplakidas: I cannot find a matching (or particularly close) LotR tree image. Can you link to one? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:36, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Pi.1415926535: [5], [6], [7], [8], [9] Constantine ✍ 00:46, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete None of those are the exact same design. However, I can confirm your report of the 20th-century emblem. The original uploader on enwiki is also indeffed for making hoax articles about Afghanistan, and socking to support that, so it is not surprising that they would create a fake flag as well. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:27, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Pi.1415926535: [5], [6], [7], [8], [9] Constantine ✍ 00:46, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Cplakidas: I cannot find a matching (or particularly close) LotR tree image. Can you link to one? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:36, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 13:47, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
The picture was created by Gustav Lærum, a Norwegian who died in 1938. As this is a work of art, Norwegian copyright expires 70 years after death (i.e 2008) - so this would still have been in copyright in Norway in 1996, and US copyright would have been restored under the URAA. As it is in copyright in the US, it isn't free enough for Commons. Nigel Ish (talk) 11:12, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- This was published in 1894. Works published before 1924 are not copyrighted in the US, see Commons:URAA-restored copyrights. Thuresson (talk) 00:59, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Thuresson. --Regasterios (talk) 21:12, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Náhrál/a jsem to omylem Pastorius (talk) 11:15, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Original author's request, recently created content. Other version: File:Kříž u pramene svatého Ivana ve Svatém Janu pod Skalou.jpg. --Regasterios (talk) 20:18, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фотограф фото и изображённый один из персон на снимке-одно и тоже лицо Dogad75 (talk) 20:33, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Furthermore copyvio: https://chernetsky.livejournal.com/170580.html. --Regasterios (talk) 20:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фотограф фото и изображённый на снимке-одно и тоже лицо Dogad75 (talk) 20:34, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Furthermore copyvio: https://chernetsky.livejournal.com/170580.html. --Regasterios (talk) 20:41, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фотограф фото и изображённый один из персон на снимке-одно и тоже лицо Dogad75 (talk) 20:34, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Furthermore copyvio: https://chernetsky.livejournal.com/170580.html. --Regasterios (talk) 20:44, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фотограф фото и изображённый один из персон на снимке-одно и тоже лицо. Необходимо обращение в OTRS. Dogad75 (talk) 20:35, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Furthermore copyvio: https://chernetsky.livejournal.com/170580.html. --Regasterios (talk) 20:42, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Александр Чернецкий (talk · contribs)
[edit]Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фотограф фото и изображённый один из персон на снимке-одно и тоже лицо. Необходимо обращение в OTRS.
- File:2014.Разные Люди - 25 лет!.png
- File:2001.Разные Люди - SuperБизоны.png
- File:1996.РЛ Студия DDT.jpg
- File:1993.РЛ Питер.jpg
Dogad75 (talk) 20:37, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Furthermore copyvio: https://chernetsky.livejournal.com/170580.html. --Regasterios (talk) 20:38, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Please give a more specific link A1Cafel (talk) 04:22, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- I regret that I can not find this photo at Pexels. Exif data says photographer is Philipp Henzler. Also published at [10] under CC-0. Use with {{Unsplash}}. Thuresson (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: changed the source. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:05, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- the photograph has no historical, educational value, the author was too lazy to put the location. It’s impossible to understand anything by Description
akalan_68@hotmail.com alone. It is just a sea of nothing more.--Ayratayrat (talk) 17:05, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- Izmir in Turkey. Thuresson (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: now has useful categories. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:05, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- the photograph has no historical, educational value, the author was too lazy to put the location. It’s impossible to understand anything by the German name “Shop in Izmir” alone. --Ayratayrat (talk) 17:02, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- I do not understand your poor english ("the author was too lazy to put the location"!?). "Geschäfte" means here "commercial operations" and not "shops". --Ziegler175 (talk) 10:56, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: has useful categories. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:06, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Pexels's CC0 license was revoked since July 2018 A1Cafel (talk) 09:48, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- James Wheeler also published this photo at unsplash.com under CC-0. Use with {{Unsplash}}. Thuresson (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Also uploaded on Unsplash after their license change, no free sources. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:06, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
All nominated files depict works by the stained glass artist Max Ingrand (1908–1969) in Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô, France, which are still copyrighted and for which we unfortunately do not have freedom of panorama.
- File:FranceNormandieSaintLoNotreDameVitrail.jpg
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 005.JPG
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 006.JPG
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 007.JPG
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 008.JPG
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 009.JPG
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 010.JPG
AFBorchert (talk) 11:11, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 05:48, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
These are all photos of stained glass windows created by Jean-Paul Froidevaux (1937–) for Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô, France, which are still protected by copyright and for which we unfortunately do not have freedom of panorama.
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 019.JPG
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 020.JPG
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 021.JPG
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 022.JPG
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 023.JPG
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 033.JPG
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 034.JPG
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 035.JPG
AFBorchert (talk) 11:41, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 05:48, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
These photos depict stained glass windows by Jean-Henri Couturat (1904–1974) which are still protected by copyright and for which unfortunately we do not have freedom of panorama.
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 016.JPG
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 017.JPG
AFBorchert (talk) 14:08, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 05:48, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
resolución de imagen insuficiente Ahtsgdf (talk) 12:11, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:07, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BevinKacon as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Perhaps the characters are de minimis A1Cafel (talk) 12:25, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: characters are quite central, framed by the other people in the picture. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:08, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Probable copyvio, this is a corporate logo with no evidence that the company has released it under a CC licence Keith Edkins (talk) 13:07, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep – Clearly meets {{PD-Textlogo}}. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 08:21, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:08, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Spam (oc:Moustafa Nouraldeen).
- File:Moustafa Nouraldeen portrait.jpg
- File:Egyptian Court of Justice.jpg
- File:Moustafa Nouraldeen in 2019.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:47, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete portraits as spam. Delete File:Egyptian Court of Justice.jpg as COPYVIO of [11]. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 08:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:09, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Bude nahrán znovu Anděl (talk) 17:52, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:09, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Bude nahrán znovu Anděl (talk) 17:55, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:09, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
i change mind 8195th (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Comment File uploaded in 2017. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:23, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: not in use, courtesy deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:09, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dave.mckiernan (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Dancing Brave.jpg - Low quality image; lack of EXIF may indicate this is a screenshot of a video which are highly likely to be copyrighted
- File:Dancing Brave at Dalham Hall Stud.jpg - The same screenshot, only that its a camera capture pointed at a monitor where the screenshot is shown
Given the captions indicating this is from around 1989, it's highly unlikely anything showing this "Dancing Brave" from that time is freely licensed, as the horse was born after 1977.
It should be deleted per c:COM:DW/c:COM:SS, and c:COM:PCP. Thanks.
theinstantmatrix (talk) 20:32, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:10, 19 December 2019 (UTC)