Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/06/21

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 21st, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused & outdated chemical reaction equations, I replaced it with File:Industrial reppe-synthesis of 1,4-butanediol.svg as a more compact version with the same content. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:28, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:09, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A screenshot from a movie, which is a copyright violation. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:36, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:04, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image needs to be changes Penalty The Film (talk) 11:12, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko. Reason for deletion: Commons:Licensing: movie poster. 大诺史 (talk) 14:35, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS 大诺史 (talk) 14:00, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:08, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Knvrajesh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I don't think these are this users own work, some are available over Instagram

Eatcha (talk) 17:29, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (they also have facebook tagging). --DMacks (talk) 17:57, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shivabiswas22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope personal photos, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 09:32, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Shivabiswas22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos of non contributor + Oos

Eatcha (talk) 16:43, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:19, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Redirect, easily confused with {{PD-USGov-State}}. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:49, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexis Jazz: Even I got to agree. I was not aware of the other template but now that I am I think this one should be deleted too. Fluffy89502 ~ talk^ 07:19, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: G7. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:10, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

test page creation 大诺史 (talk) 14:50, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted --- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:24, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image did not fully load; descriptive portion in black area; remaining portion does not provide any useful purpose Deanlaw (talk) 18:27, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom; glitch failed upload. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:36, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bonds are overlapped (as noted by User:Edgar181). Problem is so bad it appears there is a 4-membered ring and a carbon with 5 bonds! File:Strictamine.svg is the replacement. DMacks (talk) 03:09, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I found carbon with 5 bonds, laughed and deleted the file speedily. Taivo (talk) 12:30, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copyright violation. No evidence provided by uploader to indicate this is a free image. DaHuzyBru (talk) 07:51, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:21, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

quero mandar uma nova versao Maperna4 (talk) 09:05, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

mandei de novo, tem dois iguais, quero apagar este Maperna4 (talk) 00:14, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 14:34, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused & opaque ball-and-stick model, hydrogen atoms are partly faded so they are transparent in some parts. Have File:1,2-Difluoroethane 3D ball.png as high-quality replacement. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:49, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep for now. It matches the atom-color and conformation (syn) of File:1,2 Difluroethane Spacefill Model.png, whereas the proposed replacement is a different conformation (anti). In particular, conformational analysis (especially syn vs anti) of this specific chemical is a key part of en:Gauche effect (and related articles).
    I agree it has poor lighting (and the spacefill file I mentioned is even worse lighting). A unified set of [ball&stick and space-fill] of [syn and anti] in high quality and equivalent orientation (keeping one atom same and twisting other) could flip my vote to delete (and to also delete the others in the User:Mpiechowski set). DMacks (talk) 03:40, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@DMacks: That's indeed a good reason for keeping the file for now. Yeah, my file is drawn in the anti-conformation. I try to upload a whole package of high-quality 1,2-Difluoroethane ball-and-stick as well as spacefill models in the future. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:47, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Is there a way to bring the filesize of the proposed replacement down a bit? It's 17MB whereas the nominated file is 55KB. The high quality ball&stick I see for other small compounds are typically in the few-hundred-KB range (example Category:1,2-dichloroethane generally have 1/100 your filesize but still manage to achieve 1/4 your pixels). Is there some way to bring that down without losing value? DMacks (talk) 03:40, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@DMacks: You are right with this point as well! I have reduced the file size by compressing the file. Now they file size is about 200KB. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:32, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination per reasoning of DMacks, I think we should keep the file for now until I or some other user uploaded a equivalent replacement with the same conformation. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:32, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:10, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image Vauxford (talk) 12:32, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Túrelio. --JuTa 16:32, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

accidental upload of copyrighted book/magazine cover Mindmatrix 15:36, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 13:18, 22 Juni 2019 UTC: Derivative work of non-free content (F3): Book cover --Krdbot 19:19, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was an error Pacopac (talk) 20:53, 21 June 2019 (UTC) Was an error Pacopac (talk) 21:00, 21 June 2019 (UTC) Was an error Pacopac (talk) 21:05, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 16:16, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Veraltetes Bild - Bungee-Jumping ist am Donauturm nicht mehr möglich. Die Rampe wurde abmontiert Lisa Kolb (talk) 08:46, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bild ist veraltet - es gibt keine Absprungrampe mehr am Donauturm Lisa Kolb (talk) 08:13, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This can be true, but the file is nevertheless used. Taivo (talk) 14:24, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. @Lisa Kolb: Wenn Bungee-Jumping am Donauturm nicht mehr möglich ist, dann ist das Bild nicht "veraltet", sondern historisch und damit sogar noch wertvoller geworden. Auf Wikimedia Commons behalten wir Bilder langfristig auch unter historischen Gesichtspunkten, und solche, die einen vergangenen Zustand dokumentieren, sind sogar besonders erwünscht. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:03, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was uploaded by me and it contains individuals who do not want their identity to be known Flixtey (talk) 13:40, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, per courtesy. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 19:45, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dit is een fout, en had nooit online mogen komen Knpvnl (talk) 10:16, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:47, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:24, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jcb as no license (No license since) - This file is tagged with "FOP" as it is on exhibition at the Tate Liverpool in a non temporary exhibition. The FOP tag does not suggest any additions and I'm not sure what is required as the copyright remains in force even though the photo is permitted Victuallers (talk) 07:21, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove the 'no license since' tag unless you add a license. FoP may be or may not be fine regarding the depicted object, but you must specify a license for the picture. Please see COM:L. Jcb (talk) 10:21, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Victuallers: if you took the photo, please add an acceptable license according to COM:L#Acceptable licenses. If you don't wish to assert any rights over the photo, then use {{Cc-zero}}. This is separate from the copyright status of the depicted object. clpo13(talk) 15:58, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I thought the FOP was the important bit, but I have added {{Cc-zero}} as I took the pic Victuallers (talk) 08:20, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. As the lack of license has been the online mentioned problem, we can close this. Jcb (talk) 08:56, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 08:56, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Realnitinpatel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope personal photos

Gbawden (talk) 11:03, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:25, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted logo Ranunculaa (talk) 23:08, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:56, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted logo Ranunculaa (talk) 23:09, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:56, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Torresaza

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Torresaza (talk · contribs):

Unused technical drawings with unclear importance, maybe out of project scope. Multiple files have website name, maybe not own works as claimed. Taivo (talk) 06:33, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:35, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Rona Rita

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Rona Rita (talk · contribs):

Small photo without metadata, probably copyright violation like her other uploads. Taivo (talk) 06:51, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:35, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I need to send it to a photography contest and need exclusive rights to it. Thanks Saket.lakhia (talk) 07:11, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion. 大诺史 (talk) 14:34, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:42, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I need to send it to a photography contest and need exclusive rights to it. Thanks Saket.lakhia (talk) 07:11, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion. 大诺史 (talk) 14:33, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:42, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I need to send it to a photography contest and need exclusive rights to it. Thanks Saket.lakhia (talk) 07:12, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion. 大诺史 (talk) 14:34, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:42, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I need to send it to a photography contest and need exclusive rights to it. Thanks Saket.lakhia (talk) 07:12, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion. 大诺史 (talk) 14:33, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:39, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I need to send it to a photography contest and need exclusive rights to it. Thanks Saket.lakhia (talk) 07:13, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion. 大诺史 (talk) 14:33, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I need to send it to a photography contest and need exclusive rights to it. Thanks Saket.lakhia (talk) 14:56, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:39, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I need to send it to a photography contest and need exclusive rights to it. Thanks Saket.lakhia (talk) 07:13, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion. 大诺史 (talk) 14:33, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I need to send it to a photography contest and need exclusive rights to it. Thanks Saket.lakhia (talk) 14:54, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:39, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I need to send it to a photography contest and need exclusive rights to it. Thanks Saket.lakhia (talk) 07:13, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion. 大诺史 (talk) 14:33, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:40, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I need to send it to a photography contest and need exclusive rights to it. Thanks Saket.lakhia (talk) 07:13, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion. 大诺史 (talk) 14:33, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:40, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I need to send it to a photography contest and need exclusive rights to it. Thanks Saket.lakhia (talk) 07:14, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion. 大诺史 (talk) 14:33, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:40, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I need to send it to a photography contest and need exclusive rights to it. Thanks Saket.lakhia (talk) 07:14, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion. 大诺史 (talk) 14:33, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:40, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I need to send it to a photography contest and need exclusive rights to it. Thanks Saket.lakhia (talk) 07:14, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion. 大诺史 (talk) 14:33, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:41, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I need to send it to a photography contest and need exclusive rights to it. Thanks Saket.lakhia (talk) 07:14, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion. 大诺史 (talk) 14:33, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:41, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I need to send it to a photography contest and need exclusive rights to it. Thanks Saket.lakhia (talk) 07:15, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion. 大诺史 (talk) 14:32, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:41, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I need to send it to a photography contest and need exclusive rights to it. Thanks Saket.lakhia (talk) 07:15, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion. 大诺史 (talk) 14:32, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:41, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I need to send it to a photography contest and need exclusive rights to it. Thanks Saket.lakhia (talk) 07:16, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion. 大诺史 (talk) 14:32, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:40, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I need to send it to a photography contest and need exclusive rights to it. Thanks Saket.lakhia (talk) 07:17, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion. 大诺史 (talk) 14:32, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:39, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I need to send it to a photography contest and need exclusive rights to it. Thanks Saket.lakhia (talk) 07:20, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion. 大诺史 (talk) 14:32, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:42, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Baronfuzz

[edit]

Baronfuzz (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Authors are unknown, this does not mean anonymous. Photos from 1930-s, probably still copyrighted. Family archive owner usually has no right to publish the images under free license. Taivo (talk) 07:13, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:44, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by الرشيد (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Currency from Jordan. I have looked an cannot find anything that says Jordan currency is not copyrighted.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:08, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment there's Template:PD-Jordan-money, which lists the date as 1968. I am also worried about the photograph, which the uploader hasn't sourced. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:14, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyright violation, all is sourced to the Central Bank of Jordan, and the website has copyright. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:37, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by الرشيد (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

The original uploader is rather adamant that these are in fact copyright violations. See User talk:الرشيد#my own page.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:15, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:05, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by الرشيد (talk · contribs) 3

[edit]

Probably unfree uploads of an indefinitely blocked admitted copyright violator. See also the previous DRs above, Commons:Deletion requests/File:جمل تل حلف.jpg, and Commons:Deletion requests/File:لوحة تعريفية بجبل القلعة.jpg.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:35, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per norm. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:29, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:15, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical images with bogus licenses, unclear copyright status

Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:52, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:05, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Levinmatkailu

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Levinmatkailu (talk · contribs):

If camera data exist, then mostly different. I suspect different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:30, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Levin matkailu" means "Levi tourism". I see no reason to doubt that this is a tourism cooperation organisation of the resort, using different photographers, for whom they have bought rights to the images. --LPfi (talk) 08:48, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - if they did buy the rights, they will be able to provide the documentation to OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 19:09, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NRIPEN KUMAR SINGH (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope personal photos, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 09:33, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:12, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Eleemeene1

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Eleemeene1 (talk · contribs):

Small photos and mostly without metadata. If camera data exist, then always different. I suspect different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:44, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:29, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Gejordan

[edit]

Gejordan (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Small photos without metadata. Two of them are taken from different magazines, so I suspect different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:50, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:29, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of N aziz

[edit]

N aziz (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Small photos without metadata. Probably copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 08:33, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:29, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kasperen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://www.instagram.com/katyagordon/

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:35, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:30, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ssefyou10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertising.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:09, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:30, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ssefyou10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertising.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:57, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 17:29, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pratikshourabh1122 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope personal photos

Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 16:39, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:11, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You can find the picture in "Curriculums y funciones de cada consejería en formato reutilizable" -> "Presidencia del Gobierno" or directly to "Presidencia del Gobierno" -> "Presidente" -> "CV". And all the contect of the page is under Commons license 3.0 (as it says below on the left, under the logos).TheRichic (talk) 12:22, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: licensing was fixed. --Strakhov (talk) 16:42, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Around half of the images uploaded by this user have been easily verifiable copyright violations taken from online. That doesn't inspire supreme confidence that he remainder are legitimately own work simply because image searches can't immediately find the original source. Some of these appear to be fairly evidently low resolution thumbnails. The one logo may fall under TOO, but we still need more information about source and home jurisdiction to determine that.

GMGtalk 14:04, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

http://hmf.am/%D5%B4%D5%AB%D6%84%D5%A1%D5%B5%D5%A5%D5%AC-%D5%B4%D5%AB%D5%B6%D5%A1%D5%BD%D5%B5%D5%A1%D5%B6-%D5%B0%D5%A1%D5%BD%D6%80%D5%A1%D5%A9%D5%B5%D5%A1%D5%B6-%D5%B4%D5%AB%D5%B6%D5%A1%D5%BD%D5%B5%D5%A1/

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:21, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. COM:PRP. --Strakhov (talk) 16:48, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Degraded version of File:Google Icon.svg JessydeVilly (talk) 15:10, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. --Strakhov (talk) 16:51, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a better version. File:Google icon.png Larryasou (talk) 19:50, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. Brianjd (talk) 14:47, 24 June 2020 (UTC) (non-admin close)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OOS doodle. Roy17 (talk) 16:09, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: How this file fits Commons' scope is not clear. --Strakhov (talk) 16:52, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD in exif, small size likely copyvio Eatcha (talk) 16:56, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. COM:PRP. --Strakhov (talk) 16:53, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted toy. Per COM:TOYS. Tomer T (talk) 20:44, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 16:59, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author "unknown", date "circa 1918" isn't enough to ascertain the copyright status of this presumably U.S. work, I think (date of creation isn't necessarily date of first publication). COM:PRP? Gestumblindi (talk) 20:59, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:PRP requires signicifant doubt, which I don't see presented here. And if we are going to require proof of publication for all PD-US-expired works, get ready to delete millions of files. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:34, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed these images through de:Frederick Trump (probably should have nominated the original image File:Elisabeth Christ & Friedrich Trump.jpg together with this and File:Friedrich Trump.jpg, of which the latter is in use in said article, not in separete deletion requests), and I deliberately didn't nominate other, older images used there such as File:Frederick Trump 1887.jpg, because these are most likely fine. But a 1918 creation date (or 1915, as in the family portrait in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Frederick Trump) is close enough to 1924 that, given the lack of other information (author, first publication...) I thought we should discuss the case. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:05, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. See File:Elisabeth Christ & Friedrich Trump original.jpg. The image was taken in 1902 at Lederle & Flocken company in Dürkheim, Germany, presumably by Max Lederle (Lederle was a known photographer, while I can't find anything on Flocken, and this might not be a person at all). As to Max, here is an obituary of his son Karl (1872-1940) [1], who was also a professional photographer (note that Karl moved to the US in 1890 and could not take this photo). It is reasonable to assume that Max died before 1940s too. So either {{PD-old}} or {{Anonymous-EU}} do apply here. Materialscientist (talk) 22:26, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Materialscientist: Thanks for researching and uploading that original 1902 picture! I withdraw my deletion request (must be closed by a different admin, though), provided that the description of the affected files is also corrected accordingly. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:05, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Strakhov (talk) 17:01, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bquast (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The first three files have sources on Flickr indicating they are licensed only for non-commercial use, which is not comparable with upload to Commons. The fourth is a software screen shot with no indication that this software is itself freely licensed.

GMGtalk 12:42, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:41, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chemical mistake ("phenyl group is missing") as tagged by User:Anypodetos. File:Rolapitant (Patent Verified).svg is the corrected replacement. DMacks (talk) 03:07, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 22:33, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copyright violation. No evidence provided by uploader to indicate this is a free image. DaHuzyBru (talk) 07:52, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as clearly missing permission. --Túrelio (talk) 12:16, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anshuman43 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope personal photos

Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Scope might be OK, but they should be renamed. Yann (talk) 12:59, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep -- (talk) 19:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:27, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As Edgar181 tagged it, " Missing stereochemical information.". File:Echitamidine.svg is the replacement (bonus being higher general quality also).. DMacks (talk) 03:02, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:41, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copyright violation. No evidence provided by uploader to indicate this is a free image. DaHuzyBru (talk) 07:48, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 12:14, 30 Juni 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: from Getty Images: https://tineye.com/search/fd816cca9ab93f586bfac9d207285305c2303c0b?sort=size&order=desc&page=1 --Krdbot 19:10, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copyright violation. No evidence provided by uploader to indicate this is a free image. DaHuzyBru (talk) 07:50, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 12:12, 30 Juni 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: (C) Ken Blaze, USA TODAY Sports --Krdbot 19:10, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copyright violation. No evidence provided by uploader to indicate this is a free image. DaHuzyBru (talk) 07:51, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 12:15, 30 Juni 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: (C) Romain Lafabregue --Krdbot 19:10, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copyright violation. No evidence provided by uploader to indicate this is a free image. DaHuzyBru (talk) 07:51, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 12:08, 30 Juni 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: unfree Getty image --Krdbot 19:10, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copyright violation. No evidence provided by uploader to indicate this is a free image. DaHuzyBru (talk) 07:52, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 12:12, 30 Juni 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: Copyright 2017 NBAE --Krdbot 19:10, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo Credit: Russell Bare, per File:Cindy Luna 8585 highres.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:08, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:37, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Warko as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Old family photo of a Chilean politician, unlikely to be uploader's work. Copyrighted.
Converted by me to DR, as the rationale is too vague IMO. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:51, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:


Deleted: per nomination - the images are obvious rephotographs without attribution. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:00, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lou.v1012 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyright violations. Questionable authorship claims (low resolutions, missing metadata), files grabbed from Facebook with apparently bogus licensing claims, and files grabbed from Google with apparently bogus licensing claims.

LX (talk, contribs) 21:42, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lou.v1012 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely false authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, the uploader's history, and the nature of several of the images.

LX (talk, contribs) 08:55, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:53, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In the exif, it is written in French "Droits d'auteur 2019. Tous droits réservés", which means "Copyright 2019. All rights reserved". This file doesn't seem free to me. The photographer should send an OTRS authorization (see the details in French here) Titlutin (talk) 02:03, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:09, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:08, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 15:32, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 11:12, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:11, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • It's on old magazine. I refuse the deleting. (FO.)
@Fataobstant: And? It's not 70 years old so not public domain. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:16, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:49, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a work by Η ΑΥΓΗ Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:45, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 20:20, 8 Juli 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: Screenshot from a TV channel, which, of course, is under copyrights, thus making it ineligible for Wikimedia Commons. --Krdbot 01:04, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The character in the photo requested to delete. --Iflwlou (talk) 16:06, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused / out of scope. --Emha (talk) 22:19, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The character in the photo requested to delete. --Iflwlou (talk) 16:06, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused / out of scope. --Emha (talk) 22:19, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The character in the photo requested to delete. --Iflwlou (talk) 16:06, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused / out of scope. --Emha (talk) 22:19, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The character in the photo requested to delete. --Iflwlou (talk) 16:06, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused / out of scope. --Emha (talk) 22:19, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is no doubt a duplicate of File:Pokrovkaya_Church,_Mary.jpg RekishiEJ (talk) 05:54, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - duplicate. --Emha (talk) 22:23, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Captain Raju

[edit]

CAPTAIN RAJU (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

There is no freedom of panorama in Italy and the sculpture seems to be modern. That case the photos violate sculptor's copyright. Taivo (talk) 06:45, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: COM:FOP Italy. --Emha (talk) 22:26, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Tpsakariya (talk) 07:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination / Personal photo. --Emha (talk) 22:29, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo was used only in thrice rejected draft in en.wiki, which should be deleted soon. Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:28, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Emha (talk) 22:32, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted contemporary work. Sadly, no FoP in Russia for sculptures. A.Savin 10:30, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination: COM:FOP Russia. --Emha (talk) 22:35, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a work by Η ΑΥΓΗ but by Voulí - Tileórasi Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:44, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: TV Screenshot. --Emha (talk) 22:37, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted toy that is derivative of a copyrighted character. Per COM:TOYS. Tomer T (talk) 20:47, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: COM:TOYS. --Emha (talk) 22:40, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted toy. Per COM:TOYS. Tomer T (talk) 20:48, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: COM:TOYS. --Emha (talk) 22:40, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is a tram with advertisement in Adelaide, Australia. According to COM:FOP Australia, there are no FOP for 2D works. Meanwhile the related OTRS ticket does not provide permission from the original author. As a result, the file is likely to be copyrighted and unfree. 廣九直通車 (talk) 10:05, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Meanwhile, the advertisement is one of the focus of the file, so COM:DM should not apply here, regards.廣九直通車 (talk) 10:08, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


I will obtain permission from the owners of the advertisement and resubmit.SCHolar44 (talk) 06:23, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, it is always better to obtain permission than to delete files.廣九直通車 (talk) 08:18, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:57, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A picture "created all by myself"... 20 years after the subject's death? Obvious book scan. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:35, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Balajijagadesh: a very good question. I admit it was a somewhat subjective opinion and not "obvious".
  • It is certainly a scan of some sort. The subject died before digital cameras.
  • In my experience, when I see old images of Indians, I often find they were scanned out of publications, presumably because most Indians did not own cameras at this time.
  • The scan is of high enough quality that it could have been taken from one of his books. The lack of background is particularly suspect in this regard. If it doesn't come from a book, it probably comes from an acquaintance.
In summary, it is not obvious, I can't prove it, but a Bayesian analysis would makes me lean towards a scan. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:10, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Magog the Ogre: thanks for the detailed explanation. Regards - Balaji (talk) 02:42, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:21, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Charlydia52

[edit]

Charlydia52 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

The logos surpass thrreshold of originality and need OTRS-permission from copyright holder. UNESCO files need exact source. Taivo (talk) 06:56, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:25, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Bauty Aguirre

[edit]

Bauty Aguirre (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

There is freedom of panorama in Argentina for architecture, but not for sculptures. Who are the sculptor(s) and when they died? Taivo (talk) 07:04, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:27, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Frau Katze

[edit]

Frau Katze (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

First group. Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission.

Second group. OTRS-permission from copyright holder Reederei Wessels is needed. Taivo (talk) 07:23, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:30, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of PaulTvAisa

[edit]

Here are all contributions of PaulTvAisa (talk · contribs):

Small photos and mostly without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:41, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:31, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Estucoandino

[edit]

Estucoandino (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

First group. Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission.

Second group. Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 07:55, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:32, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Lt sumit

[edit]

Lt sumit (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Small photos without metadatqa. Likely copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 08:06, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:33, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of BadassCrossStitch

[edit]

BadassCrossStitch (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Mostly small photos without metadata, probably copyright violations. I did not nominate photos taken with iPhone 7, which are likely own work. Taivo (talk) 08:23, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:34, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wallpaper photo probably not created by user and unauthorized screenshot of a commerical operating system. Tomer T (talk) 22:25, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+maybe some issues with the icons too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:02, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this image is mine and it is not free 186.182.179.102 22:39, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: insuficient rationale. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:01, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image apparently failed to fully load; remaining portion not of any use Deanlaw (talk) 22:53, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:50, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image apparently failed to fully load; remaining portion not of any use Deanlaw (talk) 22:53, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:50, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free logo, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 23:13, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:49, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement Victorgrigas (talk) 23:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain what's the problem? Ubahnverleih (talk) 23:31, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - this photo is a derivative work of the image(s) depicted on the phone. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:49, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted --Cha Ye Ryun (talk) 06:06, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

copyrighted Snowflake91 (talk) 16:55, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:48, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused copyrighted illustration with no indication of ownership. Tomer T (talk) 20:26, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:19, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work, per COM:TOYS. Tomer T (talk) 20:27, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:19, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted toy. Per COM:TOYS. Tomer T (talk) 20:29, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:19, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted toy. Per COM:TOYS. Tomer T (talk) 20:30, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:18, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted toy. Per COM:TOYS. Tomer T (talk) 20:37, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:18, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted toys. Per COM:TOYS. Tomer T (talk) 20:38, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:17, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted toys and a screenshot of a possible copyrighted image (no indication of ownership). Tomer T (talk) 20:39, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:17, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the UK for 2D graphical works. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:40, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:17, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted toy. Per COM:TOYS. Tomer T (talk) 20:40, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:16, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted toys. Per COM:TOYS. Tomer T (talk) 20:44, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:16, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted toy. Per COM:TOYS. Tomer T (talk) 20:49, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:16, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted toy. Per COM:TOYS. Tomer T (talk) 20:49, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:16, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted toy. Per COM:TOYS. Tomer T (talk) 20:50, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:16, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author "unknown", date "circa 1918" isn't enough to ascertain the copyright status of this presumably U.S. work, I think (date of creation isn't necessarily date of first publication). COM:PRP? Gestumblindi (talk) 20:58, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per research of Materialscientist at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Elisabeth Christ.jpg who uploaded the original 1902(!) picture, I withdraw my deletion request (must be closed by a different admin, though), provided that the description of the affected files is also corrected accordingly. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:08, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn by nominator. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:15, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author "unknown", date "circa 1918" isn't enough to ascertain the copyright status of this presumably U.S. work, I think (date of creation isn't necessarily date of first publication). COM:PRP? Gestumblindi (talk) 20:59, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per research of Materialscientist at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Elisabeth Christ.jpg who uploaded the original 1902(!) picture, I withdraw my deletion request (must be closed by a different admin, though), provided that the description of the affected files is also corrected accordingly. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:07, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn by nominator. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:15, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Wikillinois

[edit]

All images are marked "Own work", but the first is attributed to Jay Godwin, an employee of the LBJ Library, while another is attributed to "British Embassy US". I think it is doubtful that we have the correct source and license on any of these images. --BigrTex (talk) 21:10, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+ small sizes without EXIFs, unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:10, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work depicting slinky dog. See COM:CHARACTER. Tomer T (talk) 21:17, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:08, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted characters. See COM:CHARACTER. Tomer T (talk) 21:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:07, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

StackUp.org © All Rights Reserved Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:32, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, however I have explicit permission from Stack Up's media director. Is there another step I missed since I have permission? GeekyJ (talk) 21:56, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@GeekyJ: Yes, the photographer must send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:21, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:07, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Screenshots. Tomer T (talk) 21:34, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:07, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Screenshots. Tomer T (talk) 21:36, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:05, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A screenshot that contains copyrighted graphics from a non free app. Tomer T (talk) 21:47, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:04, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

vmtl. copyvio: laut der altersangabe müsste das bild ca. 1913 aufgenommen worden sein – also kaum vom hochladenden! Martin Sg. (talk) 22:07, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ist es denkbar, dass das Foto unter PD Switzerland (old-unknown) erhalten bleiben kann? Der (ursprüngliche) Fotograf und das Datum einer Veröffentlichung dürfte unmöglich zu ermitteln sein. Das Bild selbst wurde vor >100 Jahren aufgenommen --An-d (talk) 22:34, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - bogus license, unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:06, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographer is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 22:22, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - no permission (see com:OTRS). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:04, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per the issue in File:רן קויתי.jpg. Ldorfman (talk) 22:23, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:04, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Poetess Diamond Piece (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:41, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all The uploader tried to create an autobiography (also Self-advertising) article on English Wikipedia. Masum Reza📞 22:56, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:42, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Afanasiy Nikitin Monument

[edit]

1955 sculpture, authors are sculptor Sergei Orlov (1911–1971) and architect Grigory Zakharov (1910–1982). There is no freedom of panorama for sculptures in Russia and the photos violate their copyright. The files can be restored in 2053 (70+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 08:45, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:08, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photograph is a derivative work of Vita Nuova,[2] a 2002-sculpture by Pekka Jylhä (b. 1955; Q1232078), located in Helsinki, Finland. The author of the original work (the sculpture) is still living, so it is still under copyright and thus not in public domain. FOP in Finland is for buildings only. Apalsola tc 13:51, 21 June 2019 (UTC) –– (sculpture name capitalisation) Apalsola tc 13:58, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:39, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unauthorized derivative work of a copyrighted Disney character. See COM:TOYS. Tomer T (talk) 19:27, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:07, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A photo of a toy that is an unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted character from "Blade Runner" with clear character unique features. See COM:TOYS. Tomer T (talk) 19:29, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:02, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Congrès 2019 Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:23, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Ceci est une photo officielle du président du Congrès de la Nouvelle-Calédonie monsieur Roch Wamytan ayant pris ses fonctions le 24/05/2019.

réf: https://la1ere.francetvinfo.fr/polynesie/nouvelle-caledonie-roch-wamytan-independantiste-tete-du-congres-714189.html Template:Unigned

(Transfered) @AviationNC: Et alors ? Cette photo n'est pas libre de droits d'auteur; le photographe doit faire parvenir une autorisation via COM:OTRS/fr. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:14, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:24, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Anilvet48

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Anilvet48 (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. In addition, depicted company seems out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:24, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

en:Draft:Zeus (company) was rejected thrice and should be deleted soon. Unused logo of non-notable company, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:32, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:24, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: Claimed by uploader to be "own", but it was taken from FishBase (direct link, note "All rights reserved. Image may not be used for any purpose without permission from the copyright holder"). The photographer is Anthony C. Terceira, a well-known ichthyologist ("fish scientist") that specializes in killifish and I seriously doubt he would upload a killifish photo without even including its scientific name! I note that several other uploads by user:BadPiggies are tagged as "own", which seems highly questionable (those logos would arguably be fair-use, but that's not accepted on wiki.commons) -62.107.211.90 09:30, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment why is the copyright date stated as 1417? 大诺史 (talk) 14:52, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright © 1417. All rights reserved. Image may not be used for any purpose without permission from the copyright holder.
That is not a year. That is the FishBase code number for this photographer. 62.107.211.90 18:22, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:26, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Check out this Google Reverse Search here https://images.google.com/searchbyimage?image_url=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a1/All_I_can_see_is_People_and_love%21.jpg Eatcha (talk) 10:45, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any matches there. None in tineye either. Mvolz (talk) 18:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Mvolz, please check now -- Eatcha (talk) 20:15, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ah yes, the photographer is apparently https://pikdo.org/u/ginus0104/1533919729 Mvolz (talk) 20:18, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
original IG profile at https://www.instagram.com/emmadandelion.official/?hl=en , pikdo.org is just a money minting Web scraping website that steals images from IG. This image is the 2nd one in the gallery at https://www.instagram.com/p/Btcw6pBA05l/ -- Eatcha (talk) 20:24, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Well in that case, the uploader name is User:Emmadandelion, which is the same name? Mvolz (talk) 07:59, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what to say, but we have username such as "PewDiePie", "Batman" and even "Jesus". She has 51.9k followers on IG, maybe it is just one of her followers like the other accounts I mentioned. -- Eatcha (talk) 15:58, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And did you noticed there is no EXIF data ? If I have the original file, why would I download a compressed file and then upload it, Instead of the original file that I don't even need to download ? I don't think it is really Emmadandelion, I maybe wrong but... -- Eatcha (talk) 16:03, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:OTRS required. --ƏXPLICIT 01:27, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 11:01, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:30, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nantilus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://twitter.com/Egal_FH/status/1114837778506952706

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:05, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(transfered) Ce fichier ne viole pas les droits d'auteurs malgré le message "Ce fichier semble répondre aux critères pour une suppression rapide" puisque j'en suis l'auteur. Vérifiable en écrivant à presse-seefh(at)pm.gouv.fr. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nantilus (talk • contribs)
@Nantilus: Les règles de Commons veulent que, pour tout fichier publié auparavant sous une license non libre, le détenteur du droit d'auteur doit envoyer une permission via COM:OTRS/fr. Par ailleurs, ce n'est pas à nous de partir à la pêche aux licenses. Veillez également à l'avenir à téléverser vos images depuis votre appareil-photo avec l'ensemble des métadonnées (votre nom n'y apparaît pas et la date de création est fausse). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:13, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:55, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nantilus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Already deleted as File:ONU-CSW2019.jpeg.jpg

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:52, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: permission confirmed. --ƏXPLICIT 01:33, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2019 All rights reserved. INK Architects Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:53, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:34, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Galician Army Music (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:OOS, some already deleted.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:19, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:35, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF says it is from Instagram. Please upload the original, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 12:57, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF says it is from Instagram. Please upload the original, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 13:07, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF says it is from Instagram. Please upload the original, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 13:08, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF says it is from Instagram. Please upload the original, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 13:12, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Por quê o mesmo está corrompido, onde no upload foi enviado com problemas no carregamento. JonnyPaiva (talk) 13:25, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:37, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rappidz246 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

OOS self promotion.

Roy17 (talk) 14:02, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ZI Jony requested speedy deletion for this file on the grounds that it is a non-free logo. I think this is incorrect, that the logo does not meet the threshold of originality. See Commons:Threshold of originality#India, which explains the threshold of originality standards for India, this company's home country. India has similar standards to the United States of America, and if you check Commons:Threshold of originality#United States, you'll find a number of free logos that, in my opinion, show significantly more creativity than this one.

Per the instructions on the Template:Copyvio, I have removed the CSD template and nominated the file for deletion to facilitate discussion. Compassionate727 (T·C) 14:09, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be willing to explain why you think it should be? Compassionate727 (T·C) 14:27, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 01:40, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tangerineduel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from commercial packaging and toy.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Fleece and SafetyFix are both defunct companies, both ceased to exist around 40 or so years ago. Is there a policy relating to defunct entities and how that relates to copyright? --Tangerineduel (talk) 14:45, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:42, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AziaDaGoddess (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:31, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:42, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --ƏXPLICIT 01:43, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:44, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SEE exif, it's from google images IMHO Eatcha (talk) 14:58, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This file should not be deleted because the image has relevance to the subject of “Love Pride” and can elevate people who have been discriminated against. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rooofer (talk • contribs)


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:49, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 15:36, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:51, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 15:37, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:51, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

re-uploaded Микола Василечко (talk) 20:59, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: false CC license claim. --Sealle (talk) 10:04, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 15:41, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:51, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:06, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:51, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alan2008lo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not focused or too dark. low quality.

Roy17 (talk) 16:07, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:52, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jwoodlee3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

FBMD in Exif data(in all uploads of this user)

Eatcha (talk) 16:28, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: permission confirmed. --ƏXPLICIT 01:53, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a simple logo IMHO Eatcha (talk) 16:34, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --ƏXPLICIT 01:55, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jsnaol (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I think all of this users uploads are copyvio, they are very small images and two uploads of this user returned positive for copyvio test using google reverse search

Eatcha (talk) 16:37, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:56, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in France, copyrighted work by Guy Lartigue, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:53, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:57, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in France, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:54, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:57, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not need this Lochana Thiwanka (talk) 17:19, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:58, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original copyrighted drawing, and the photo was taken in an exposition, so it is not permanently installed in a public place Tomer T (talk) 19:37, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:01, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not so clear where this was taken at, but it is a fan art that copies with high precision the original features of a copyrighted work. Tomer T (talk) 19:40, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:01, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo of pet, usuable and out of scope. Innumerable better alternatives of dog pictures already on Commons. P 1 9 9   17:05, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asikmahmud338 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal album ? This is not a social media website. Don you understand by you en-wiki indef block ?

Eatcha (talk) 17:50, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, Deleting admin, please move his user & talk page back to the correct one. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:13, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Barriefern (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most of his uploads are copyvio from https://www.henryrichardson.com/ , try reverse searching these images on google

Eatcha (talk) 18:01, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I'm sorry that you believe these files are copyright violations. I am an arts photographer and I took these images. I have personally travelled to Florida, London, Long Island and the Berkshires to photograph these works, among others. They are free to use for anyone; in fact, I prefer this be so! Thanks you for your consideration. BR

In addition--if you would like to know the details of the work, the location, the details of the RIBA award and its location, details of the Notting Hill Carnival photo--anything--feel free to ask. Thanks,BR

Hi Barriefern, What abou this https://images.google.com/searchbyimage?image_url=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b3/Henry_Richardson_portrait_of_sculptor_with_glass_orb.jpg ? It's on henryrichardson's website ? I trust you but if you are really the creator of these images, could you please send permission to us via OTRS ? Please use the release generator at Commons:OTRS#Declaration_of_consent_for_all_enquiries and send the release note to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Thank you very much for your response -- Eatcha (talk) 05:26, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for understanding! Done! BarrieFern


Deleted: Deleted per nom, in the end only 1 had OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred, underexposed, unidentified people; many similar photos in category:Funeral of Václav Havel — Draceane talkcontrib. 11:51, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:STEPHEN A LOVE 2.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 12:56, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from http://mandegar.info/?l=מוזיקת+היפ+הופ++ויקיפדיה. But I'm not sure DiMon2711 14:36, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No. it's the other way around. They copied it from wikipedia. יוניון ג'ק (talk) 14:54, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. Very blurry. Out of Project scope. -- Geagea (talk) 09:35, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manuel Mellina Vicente (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). 大诺史 (talk) 14:54, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gbawden: The file was moved to File:Phurba.jpg and file is still there. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:41, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:45, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Degraded version of File:Google Icon.svg JessydeVilly (talk) 15:24, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And also

Small size, no metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:07, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality image, unusable and little educational value, superseded by numerous better alternative images of moon and clouds. P 1 9 9   16:49, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality image of eagle, superseded by numerous better ones in its category. P 1 9 9   17:00, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality images of an eagle, unusable, superseded by numerous better ones already on Commons. Also included:

P 1 9 9   17:01, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: uploader is the person pictured. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:09, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 09:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality. it's available in wikitext at zh:special:permalink/54517072. Roy17 (talk) 15:29, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarized File:Nagoya Guideway Bus Map.png.--121.145.243.251 16:23, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@大诺史: is this file a duplicate of File:Nagoya Guideway Bus Map.png or not? Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Gbawden: Nope. But the person who made File:中山BRT.jpg possibly took File:Nagoya Guideway Bus Map.png and edited it. Base of both files are the same. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:34, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:37, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:55, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small files without EXIF data, probably copied from social media. Please upload the original images from your camera. Thanks,

Yann (talk) 13:28, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted most, kept one per AGF and one with valid EXIF data. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:32, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not an original work of the US federal government. Rather, as the Mueller Report indicates, it was taken from Donald Trump's Instagram page in 2016 before Trump became president. This could be a fair use photo, but it doesn't belong in Commons. Arbor to SJ (talk) 13:54, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:33, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted poster B dash (talk) 14:57, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:33, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Google Icon.svg JessydeVilly (talk) 15:11, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:34, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As it says in the description of Category:Theodore Too (ship, 2000), "based on the fictional tugboat Theodore from the television show Theodore Tugboat". This image, and all others in the category, fail Commons:Derivative works. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 16:10, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Does Freedom of Panorama apply to this? Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:16, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: while most likely untested in court in Canada, I assume this is COM:FOP Canada. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:36, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in France, copyrighted work by Marnix Raedecker, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:51, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Je me suis trompé de fontaine car il ne s'agit pas de la fontaine du square des Amandiers mais de la fontaine du square des Saint-Simoniens Hunza62 (talk) 08:36, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Hunza62: Ca ne change rien: il faut la permission de l'artiste ou, si décédé, de ses héritiers. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:39, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:36, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Farhinvohra07 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private images by non-contributor, out of project scope.

Achim (talk) 18:23, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep I have uploaded this file with the permission of the person. Before uploading it i have took his permission. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farhinvohra07 (talk • contribs) 2019-06-22 13:03:12‎ (UTC)
  • Who ever person doesn't know this person can know them by seeing their images. They are famous personality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farhinvohra07 (talk • contribs) 2019-06-23 09:18:40‎ (UTC)

Deleted: for copyright reasons, I agree with Tuvalkin's scope reasons, but we'd need COM:OTRS approval. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:38, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Monument created in 1964 in Russia, no FOP and copyright not expired Kees08 (talk) 05:50, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 02:23, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

totally blurred, unidentified person --> no value — Draceane talkcontrib. 11:48, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Blurry images may still be in scope, but perhaps not hte best for direct illustative purposes, but for reasearch material. This shows the funeral and the attire of the guards in the background. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 02:25, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Zulqarnain.khan

[edit]

Zulqarnain.khan (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

I do not consider this a simple logo. In my opinion the logo is copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 08:40, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unclear TOO in the UAE. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:32, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Airplanespotter15

[edit]

Airplanespotter15 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

If camera data exist, then always different. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. I did not nominate photos taken with Fujifilm FinePix JX500, which are likely own work. Taivo (talk) 09:04, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Airplanespotter15 is Middle Georgia Airplane Spotting and TheCRTProuctions on Youtube. Several of these files are not only low quality images but also useless on Wikimedia Commons and I don't care personally if they are deleted, but they are my own works. The first GIF was taken at Wild Animal Safari in Pine Mountain, Georgia with a JVC Everio GZ-HM35BU. The second image is a slightly cropped version of a photo I took at the Georgia Jugfest in 2014. The third was taken many years ago with a Kodak Easyshare pocket camera through a car window. The fourth was taken at the Georgia Jugfest with my father's cell phone. Fifth, sixth and seventh images are totally worthless but were taken at CMJ Hobbies in Roberta, GA with a JVC Everio GZ-HM35BU camcorder. The last was taken at KATL 26 June 2013 with the same camcorder. I am not defending the value of these images but I will defend the fact that I took them. Airplanespotter15 (talk) 20:04, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, the third picture is a different one from what I thought. I took that one with the camcorder as well, though. I was only judging from the file names. That picture would have been taken from Coliseum Medical Center. Airplanespotter15 (talk) 20:14, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per explanation by uploader. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:33, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Owned by Nova Prima Alqhaderi AliffianikoTalk 11:34, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:36, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

این پرونده بایند حذف شود Arman.forughy (talk) 11:47, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:18, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This CI is set up to be distributed by individuals as CCL, even though it is an asset of the "도로교통공단" (KoROAD). Therefore, we request deletion in accordance with the copyright policy. Otstn1010 (talk) 12:14, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unclear TOO in South Korea. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:19, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any evidence that it has been published in Egypt (Dalida Fan Magazine is not an Egyptian magazine). Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:57, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Rogel What are you talking about? This is the photo of Dalida made by an unknown fotographer just after she won miss Egypt 1954 title, the promotional photo from studio - the only period in her life she was wearing this famous leopard skin bikini. Dalida had never left Egypt before 25 december 1954 when she went to Paris. She won the miss egypt in early 1954 and official book and website tell this story of leopard skin bikini, not even mentioning how Orlando told it countless times. I used fan magazine as source because it was published in official fanclub magazine (run by Orlando's team) alongside the text about Miss Egypt 1954. The photo is in public doman as it was made in Egypt and published in newspapers. Btw here is link for the actual cutted newspaper from that day, that Orlando keeps in his collection: [3]. It is photo made by me of a paper of that magazine, while this coloured photo I posted on wiki is from same magazine but I only scanned it as it is the best one from all Miss Egypt photo session. I am sorry but I don't know what to say, this question is literally absurd to me as Dali left egypt almost a year after Miss Egypt, and it is common knowledge how she won thanks to this leopard skin bikini. All photos and videos connected to this bikini were made solely in Egypt and first published there. Dalida Editor please ping or message me 20:23, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@DalidaEditor: Nobody says it has not been created 1954. Where is the evidence it has been published 1954? Where is the evidence that photographer is unknown? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:35, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: Official biography by Catherine Rihoit says how photos of Iolanda as miss appeared same week in journal the Le progress Egyptien. In Dalida expo 2007, in Paris city hall, only 4 photos were shown in context of Miss Egypt: This coloured one (shown most distincitve as it is obviously the best one from the session), one black and white of Dalida standing on the stage and while walking (probably during the competition on the catwalk), one bad image round shape and the third which is a cut from newspaper that has inscription above "Devenez une vedette" (Become a singer/actor). As this last mentioned has description below how Gigliotti is in Paris - photo provided in link (meaning it was issued later to say how a miss egypt is trying to pursue her career overseas), we can write it off. So only remaining photos that have may appeared in Le progress are this coloured, and two others that are provided in link. So what do you think? I think that it is so obvious that this one was issued... if more proof is needed, I may ask Orlando over dalida.com ask and respond option. Dalida Editor please ping or message me 21:37, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no need for copyright paranoia. License is very likely correct. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any evidence that it has been published in Egypt (Dalida Fan Magazine is not an Egyptian magazine). Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:51, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Patrick Rogel: I already showed you in the previous closed discussion: here is the link for the photo of fanclub magazine page which contains the actual cutted newspapers from that day in 1954, that Orlando keeps in his collection and which he approved to be published in magazine: [4]. The provided link shows the left page. The right page is whole covered with this photo I posted on wikipedia. Dalida Editor please ping or message me 15:33, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Don't reopen DRs without new arguments. @Patrick Rogel: Consider this a warning. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:02, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Well. The profession of journalist existed in 1954, and as no author neither the original publication is given, it is impossible to say that the photo have been published in Egypt. Is it not common for the major press companies to mandate their photographers to go abroad, who then come back to publish the photos in their country of origin? it's even the most plausible option here, a phohograph from abroad came to egypt, took the photo, and the photo was published by a major (non-Egyptian) newspaper/magazine. We have obviously no idea about who took or published the photo. But anyway, even in the case that we consider it as an "Egyptian work" (in contrast to our policy of the precautionary principle, and that's an understatement since we don't know the author or the publication), as per the URAA (see license tag), the photo is younger than 1946, and is not in PD in USA. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:28, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So if is not PD in USA but in Egypt, it still stayes on wiki? Dalida Editor please ping or message me 17:36, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No, it must be both. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:48, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Christian Ferrer: you might want to read this discussion. I gave up on getting anything done about this group of editors and their Dalida uploads. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 00:19, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I remember having put on deletion both files by Fan années 70 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) (21 files deleted) and the ones from DalidaEditor (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) (23 files deleted) and even so we have an Administrator who prefers to trust the latter... We should try an RCU. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:39, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have nothing to say more but just to advise you to read my previous explications. I first uploaded a seres of photos back in mid 2018 when I had no idea how commons function, which was accidental mistake. They all went to be deleted. After that I uploaded several photos for which I tought I have evidence, and several stayed while several were deleted. Then I stopped, I haven't uploaded anything for a whole year. From my side, whole this story about Dalida's pics is done regarding any further uploads. Dalida Editor please ping or message me 23:46, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 15:41, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ernesto biscocho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pretty cool, but totally derivative works.

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:28, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was maybe too quick on this. Probably covered by Commons:Freedom of panorama#Spain. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:31, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Too bad. Depicted works are covered by FoP I think but the photos seem to be COM:NETCOPYVIO. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:34, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: FOP-Spain. --Yann (talk) 16:18, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ernesto biscocho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not sure the above was correct, but I slipped up too: obra para el museo de Arqueología de Módena, Italia. Bajo cuyo suelo se encuentran los restos de la ciudad romana de Mutina. Obra realizada exactamente donde los arqueólogos han identificado las termas. Para la celebración de los 2200 años de la fundación de Mutina . ("Mutina splendidissima")

That's in Italy.

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:45, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no FOP in Italy. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:24, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of {{Own}}. The uploader, SourceAdevarul (adevarul = the truth) indicates Ivan Goroszky as the photographer but gives no evidence that he is indeed Ivan Goroszky. The picture might be a scan from a book (Lumea copiilor Norvegia = World of Children Norway). So maybe it is just {{Self-scanned}}, which is irrelevant for copyright.

The picture is the uploader's only contribution.

-- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 19:57, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:24, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Family portrait of Frederick Trump

[edit]

Various versions of the same image. Author "unknown", date "circa 1915" isn't enough to ascertain the copyright status of this presumably U.S. work, I think (date of creation isn't necessarily date of first publication). COM:PRP?

Gestumblindi (talk) 21:09, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, a formal transfer of copyright from a photo studio to the customer isn't something that really happened often, at least here in Europe. Quite the contrary, photo studios kept the negatives as well as the rights and offered to sell more copies if needed. Was it different in the US in Frederick Trump's time? Gestumblindi (talk) 18:14, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Also, public domain in the U.S. for works of this time doesn't depend on the date of death of the copyright owner, but on the date of first publication. The template {{PD-old-100}} which you suggested, BevinKacon, contains a note You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States. That could be {{PD-US-expired}} if the photograph was first published before January 1, 1924. Gestumblindi (talk) 18:26, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Has anyone claiming to be copyright holder complained about this?Batvette (talk) 16:56, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Per COM:PRP, arguments like "the copyright holder has not complained / will not complain" are not valid. Gestumblindi (talk) 18:57, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Family photos are often not "published" close to the date they are created, so we'd need to establish a publishing date. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:21, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image has copyright symbol at center; license apparently incorrect Deanlaw (talk) 22:42, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

author here. i posted that in my photo just because so many people were violating the cc-by-nd/cc-by-nc license i usually license them on, depending if i upload to wikipedia or not. should i be using another symbol? i'll reupload all the files on wikipedia that use the copyright symbol. RealBuizel10 (talk) 02:37, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment a copyright symbol (and a watermark) is compatible with a CC license, as example see one of our pages Template:Information, at bottom you can read "© John Doe". Furthermore a photo under a CC license is still copyrighted. If the uploader here is the same that the Flickr account owner then it is ok for us IMO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:59, 21 July 2019 (UTC) correction: if the flickr author is the owner then it is ok for us IMO, and the watermak match with the name, therefore it is very likely ok. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:12, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: CC-licensed files are still copyrighted. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:22, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Disney's Pop Century Resort

[edit]

See Commons:Freedom_of_panorama/Americas#United_States_of_America regarding Artworks and sculptures. Pictures of copyrighted artwork and sculptures from a hotel opened in 2003 (Disney's Pop Century Resort). --Tomer T (talk) 20:00, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Orlando - Disney World - Disney's Pop Century Resort - Entrance Sign (17031505538).jpg and File:Disney's-Pop-Century-Resort-Entrance.jpg, simple geometry & letters. --Elisfkc (talk) 19:05, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; kept 2 as per above. P 1 9 9   20:10, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]