Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/03/30

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 30th, 2019


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file can be deleted! Replaced by File:Industrielle Synthese von n-Propylamin.svg which has a better quality and some errors were fixed, too. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 11:52, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted already. --E4024 (talk) 17:57, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think that the image is not free, since the source of the image does not indicate the license: https://www.gob.pe/institucion/61/alta-direccion/617 Ovruni (talk) 19:03, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 04:28, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mediagroup100 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, no metadata, unlikely to be own work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:28, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --1989 (talk) 15:20, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:52, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think that this image is not free, because it seems taken from Twitter: https://twitter.com/susaludperu/status/1082736624356806656 Ovruni (talk) 17:26, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by 1989 at 14:59, 31 März 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 19:04, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work without EXIF. E4024 (talk) 18:08, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand where is the problem. Can you explain me ? --DeuxPlusQuatre (talk) 20:12, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you look at the "Metadata" section of the File:Josephine Meckseper.jpg you will see that it was taken with a Canon camera. Then it is "not dubious" like this one. Best. --E4024 (talk) 20:30, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Duplicate of File:Juliette Rennes-3.jpg. --Yann (talk) 19:51, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work without EXIF. See MD of other uploads by the same user, they have EXIF. E4024 (talk) 18:15, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand where is the problem. Can you explain me ? Thank you--DeuxPlusQuatre (talk) 20:11, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Duplicate of File:Fernanda Melchor-3.jpg, renamed. --Yann (talk) 19:47, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unvalid license at Flickr. Read COM:L Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:46, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 16:46, 31 März 2019 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flavia Pavanelli.jpg: Unvalid license at Flickr. Read COM:L --Krdbot 19:04, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is it in scope? E4024 (talk) 14:10, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:35, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject on the left is a private citizen and has not given permission/consent for the photo to be uploaded online. Luntian (talk) 11:22, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Orphan image uncat since June 2016, no evidence of notability nor compensating in scope usefulness. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:26, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Should have been a category, sorry Derbrauni (talk) 07:43, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 18:15, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 06:11, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete asap. Personality rights. (IMHO a bad-faith upload, by a one-time visitor). Also "Sergito" (Sergio) sounds bad to me. "Drink responsibly" is a good slogan. --E4024 (talk) 11:56, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:03, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional Partial suspension (talk) 01:34, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 07:31, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:03, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 07:31, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:03, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 07:32, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:03, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 07:32, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:03, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remainig contribution. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible as well. Taivo (talk) 08:08, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:03, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete COM:SCOPE, this young man is not Gabino Diego in 1983. This selfie is most probably a hit-pic of an unknown person loosely looking like Gabino Diego uploaded to harass him in es:wiki. Asqueladd (talk) 09:15, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:04, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:36, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:04, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 10:46, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:04, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c)Andrej Vasilenko, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:38, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:04, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:45, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:04, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© ARA 2018 Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:48, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:04, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:03, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:05, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. MSeses (talk) 13:28, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:06, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. MSeses (talk) 13:29, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:06, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. MSeses (talk) 13:30, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:06, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. MSeses (talk) 13:30, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:06, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. MSeses (talk) 13:31, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:06, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. MSeses (talk) 13:32, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:06, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. MSeses (talk) 13:33, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:06, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. MSeses (talk) 13:33, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:06, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete, OoS. ("my picture in office") E4024 (talk) 14:11, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:08, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:08, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:08, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:23, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:08, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 16:32, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:08, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SachinJangra900 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal Photos, out of scope, Commons is not a web host

Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:34, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:09, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 17:03, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:10, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused album cover, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 17:03, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 07:10, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect (Si missing); replaced by File:Bromtrimethylsilan.svg. Leyo 23:18, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 18:34, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image, presented as a logo, cannot be considered too simple not to be copyrighted. As such, it has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from the owner. Ldorfman (talk) 00:57, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Fair use material is not permitted on Wikimedia Commons (F2). -- Geagea (talk) 14:22, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks OoS, right? E4024 (talk) 22:41, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ruthven at 13:30, 7 April 2019 UTC: Needs to be speedily deleted, copyright violation of a verified YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YG5kdPnIKFw also the uploader is blocked indefinitely --Krdbot 18:56, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

corrupted file Joschi71 (talk) 02:00, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:58, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is not of any species of Limnophylla. It is possibly of a species of Vallisneria, see: 101.165.155.180 08:34, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment No need for deletion but a renaming of the file is in order if the nominator's assertion is correct. - Takeaway (talk) 11:38, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep (or Rename as appropriate) If reliable sources for the correct taxonomy could be posted for review, then rename. Otherwise keep as there is currently no basis given for deletion based on an unsupported claim of erroneous designation. Geoff Who, me? 13:06, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion for what? License is ok: This image, which was originally posted to Flickr, was uploaded to Commons using Flickr upload bot on 25 May 2009, 23:33 by Glane23. On that date, it was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the license indicated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bestoernesto (talk • contribs) 15:08, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF. Seems OoS to me but could be used as a sample image of men of his country. I refrain saying yes or no, but thought it was necessary to discuss. E4024 (talk) 11:37, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark of a website in the picture. The photo is certainly not the "own work" of the author Vivelefrat (talk) 14:19, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:55, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://kazakh-tv.kz/kg/view/news_kazakhstan/page_178258_ копирайт 79.126.9.12 15:25, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:54, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

scaled down version of File:Blida centre.jpg Anvilaquarius (talk) 15:27, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:54, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.vkgu.kz/en/node/1905 копирайт 79.126.9.12 15:30, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:54, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

irrelevant for the subject; no release for portrait rights Ad Meskens (talk) 15:46, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:54, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Patricia921 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very low res, yet good quality, only 2 uploads from this user, no meta data, unlikely own work...

BevinKacon (talk) 15:49, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:51, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because an editor marked it for speedy deletion? Mcb133aco (talk) 16:35, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor marked this image for speedy deletion when it does not meet that criteria and attached a link to an image that clearly shows the following @

https://seabeemagazine.navylive.dodlive.mil/2018/07/15/this-week-in-seabee-history-july-15-july-21/

The image has a source tag stating the image is in the U.S.Navy Seabee archives (Photo courtesy of U.S. Navy Seabee Museum). That makes it U.S. government property and in the public domain.

The image clearly indicates it wss published in a U.S. Government periodical (Seabee Magazine, Naval Heritage and History Command, 805 Kidder Breese Street, Washington, DC 20003. That also makes it U.S. government property and in the public domain.

The reason the Seabee Museum has possession of this image is that it was produced by a member of the U.S. Military, also making it public domain.

As such it has a valid licence.

Mcb133aco (talk) 17:01, 30 March 2019 (UTC)mcb133acoMcb133aco (talk) 17:01, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: G'day, the online source page does appear to be a US Navy publication per Worldcat, and the photo credit in the source indicates the image comes from the US Navy Seabee Museum. As such, unless I am missing something, this does appear to be PD as a work of the US government per the license the uploader used on the image. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 21:45, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: US Govt work, so PD. --Gbawden (talk) 07:51, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsuccesful upload - the full image is available at File:2018 King of the Hill Mugs.jpg Henxter (talk) 18:03, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:49, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Websterdead

[edit]

and other uploaded by Websterdead. I've already found sources of two copyright violated pictures. Other are most probably copyright violations too. -- Jakubhal 18:11, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted by 32x. --Gbawden (talk) 07:48, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© NCBJ 2017 Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:10, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete--Roy17 (talk) 09:46, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:48, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dex2018 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://www.sergiokato.com/images

Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:25, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, (C) at source. --Gbawden (talk) 07:49, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of presumably copyrighted packaging (COM:PACKAGING) Deevayy (talk) 20:39, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:48, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD at MD. E4024 (talk) 22:38, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and OOS. --Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark of a website in the picture. The photo is certainly not the "own work" of the author Vivelefrat (talk) 14:18, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Gbawden at 07:55, 8 April 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Garde du Meurice.jpg --Krdbot 12:53, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

20-year-old local philosopher. As such probably OoS. However I like the photo and vote keep before someone deletes it without discussion. Not used at the moment but I see a potential for use in this sympathetic image. E4024 (talk) 11:34, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, as source country is identified, we can use the photo for illustrating people of Chad. Big photo, EXIF exists. I'll try to categorize it. Taivo (talk) 09:33, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a hoax created by an expelled user. He's been expelled for the creation of multiple hoaxes and accounts: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Tabl%C3%B3n_de_anuncios_de_los_bibliotecarios/Portal/Archivo/Miscel%C3%A1nea/Actual#Evasi%C3%B3n_de_Bloqueo_de_BabyKids2019

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Ghso_ehwj/Archive MexTDT (talk) 08:12, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 07:35, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found in the provided source 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:43, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:36, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dashka isn't author of this work (Nikolai Akimov) Сидик из ПТУ (talk) 19:44, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unclear copyrigth status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:35, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1919 or 20 plus 120 makes 2040. Then this pic will become "free". Of course if PD status is not shown by a better source than a contemporary Turkish newspaper. Indeed it gives me pain to propose the deletion of this historical image of what caused the fact that most Greek citizens of the former Ottoman Empire or the New Turkey had to leave the country after its liberation. People who celebrate "the occupation of their own country". What a pity... E4024 (talk) 19:47, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:34, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Наверно, всё-таки нарушение авторского права Леонид Макаров (talk) 19:47, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:32, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found on the provided source. 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:52, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:29, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Bottles of eating oil
No evidence that the photographer is the copyright owner of the image(s) on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using e.g. {{Licensed-PD}}.
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:48, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:27, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lo subí por error REC-MAX (talk) 23:01, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:27, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lo subí por error REC-MAX (talk) 23:02, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:26, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. Subject is some commonplace computer error which did not cause major disruption to train service, as far as I could find online. Roy17 (talk) 23:18, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:26, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original research derived originally from deleted file Horn1915ad.png per description. Kzl55 (talk) 09:43, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. A vague "Original research" claim doesn't fit Commons:Deletion policy. If someone feels the map is not accurate just don't use it in Wikipedia or wherever (or suggest how to improve it). Strakhov (talk) 14:34, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image has been tagged since 18 October 2018‎ as needing clarification regarding the license. The image is also published here where it has a photo credit and no visible free license. Bensin (talk) 16:29, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:45, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tagged "Fact disputed" since 18 October 2018‎. Bensin (talk) 16:32, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:45, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David290 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear source and copyright status. File:Beijing New Airport-1.jpg still has a watermark stating (among others) "all rights reserved". Some clear source URL and some evidence of CC licensing is needed here.

Ariadacapo (talk) 10:10, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ariadacapo: File:Beijing New Airport-1.jpg is already deleted.David290 (talk) 18:56, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, no permission.--Roy17 (talk) 23:20, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:41, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David290 (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

No permission from the artists 张沛坚 or 何婧. 二泉映月, 春到田间 and 平湖秋月 广东音乐 合奏 are phishy too. The three were claimed to be the uploader's own works, but they are similar in style to the other files.

Roy17 (talk) 23:40, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@David290: you can find information for this on Commons:OTRS. Ariadacapo (talk) 10:32, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please point out my mistake if I really made it.廣九直通車 (talk) 10:36, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 UpdateThe permission email for File:春到田间.ogg has been reviewed, and I have approved the email as well.廣九直通車 (talk) 05:50, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Roy17: Sorry about my mistakes, would you make a summary of copyright statuses about all files listed on this deletion request? I am actually not so sure about audio files...廣九直通車 (talk) 12:35, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@廣九直通車: No worries. It might be a common misconception that traditional Chinese music are historical works, but actually many were composed not more than 100 years ago and their composers died in late 20th century. The ones to be deleted are listed above. Here come the ones I tend to support  Keep:

Kept: the files that have OTRS permission confirmed. Deleted the rest. --Majora (talk) 21:12, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David290 (talk · contribs) 3

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). Some may fufill COM:BLP.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:01, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In terms of project scope, I think these are OK:
  1. File:Wedding in dongguan 2015.jpg
  2. File:Ayen Ho - 17.png
  3. (wrt the list at special:permalink/357504282) Between (inclusive) File:20190601 150709 A.jpg and File:20190601 160840 A.jpg . These are photos of the two girls in Asian costumes. Keeping all is OK, but selecting some good ones from the batch would be even better.--Roy17 (talk) 17:03, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@大诺史: Some pictures of sea turtles in Huizhou are being moved, will you do a favor to move over those files? David290 (talk) 04:57, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@大诺史: File:Ayen Ho - 17.png is not private photo, it is taken in music activity. David290 (talk) 04:08, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 13:35, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David290 (talk · contribs) 4

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE: COM:HOST.

Mys_721tx (talk) 13:48, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:38, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David290 (talk · contribs) 5

[edit]

The files are images of anime models, in which the original characters is likely to be copyrighted by the producer. As a result, the images are derivative works of copyrighted works, and is likely to be unfree per COM:CB#Comic and action figures.廣九直通車 (talk) 02:53, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:31, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David290 (talk · contribs) 6

[edit]

The files are images of billboards of a railway construction site. However, Template:PD-PRC-exempt is not a valid license for files by normal users. Meanwhile China Railway Construction Corporation is not a governmental agency, therefore Template:PD-PRC-exempt is also invalid for the billboards.廣九直通車 (talk) 05:45, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:33, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David290 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Near duplicate of File:CJ750 1953.jpg

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:37, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:28, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David290 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:38, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 02:59, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a hideous picture of me, Aleshea Harris. There are better pictures online and available for use. VagabondVillain (talk) 04:52, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:48, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is copyrighted. 1994ams (talk) 07:10, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you upload it then? --E4024 (talk) 16:33, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:48, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication of CC in the linked source Eran (talk) 08:02, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:48, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

corrupted file MSeses (talk) 12:20, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:48, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

corrupted file MSeses (talk) 12:21, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 11:47, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, blurred, unused, worse discription. MSeses (talk) 12:29, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:47, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

corrupted file MSeses (talk) 13:05, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 11:47, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is a copyright of DIYguru and is a violation of our brand and policies. It has been posted by some user to downgrade the image on Internet 27.5.24.213 04:24, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --jdx Re: 00:45, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I gave full description as filename, this is causing trouble in adding other version template, Kindly do delete asap Thx in advance. Veena.manikprabhu (talk) 06:59, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Veena.manikprabhu: If the filename is the issue, you may request a renaming of the file − see Commons:File renaming. Jean-Fred (talk) 14:55, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Veena.manikprabhu: What is the correct filename?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:12, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Please request a file rename. --Green Giant (talk) 21:57, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution, watermark. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:18, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Taivo: Faceu is a photo software. It automatically adds watermarks to your photos when you are taking a photo unless you disable it in the settings. So I think this may be the negligence of the uploader. In summary, I don't think this is not copyright violation. Regards. -- Catherine Laurence 09:11, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The upload history of the user strongly suggests copyright violations. --Green Giant (talk) 21:59, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Walk Like an Egyptian as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Unused and non-encylopedic image that was seemingly uploaded for personal storage. Not sure, maybe has some educational content. Needs discussion. Taivo (talk) 08:32, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Green Giant (talk) 22:01, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Slafinee23 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test files.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 22:04, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote this short story and uploaded it to Wiki Commons so that a group of students would feel free to adapt it without fear of being charged with copyright infringement. I don't understand what the request for deletion means or what I should do about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsparksco (talk • contribs) 16:04, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Commons is not your webhost. You may wish to look at Wikiversity as an appropriate wiki. --Green Giant (talk) 22:05, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:ReactiveNitrogenCycle.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 22:08, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, unused, worse discription. MSeses (talk) 13:21, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:41, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs of toys in Category:TTT 2018

[edit]

The selected photographs fail to meet the official guidelines of COM:TOYS, specifically:

When uploading a picture of a toy, you must show that the toy is in the public domain in both the United States and in the source country of the toy. In the United States, copyright is granted for toys even if the toy is ineligible for copyright in the source country.

There has been no evidence presented that the toys are public domain.

For an in-depth background and explanation of Commons copyright policies, refer to the Stuffed Animals essay and the precedent of prior closely related deletion requests: Petit tigre, Erminig, Wendy the Weasel & Percy Plush, Wikimania 2014 Day 1, Jimmy Wales meeting Mr Penguin.


Note that the white tiger is made by Cuddlekins, which may be an subsidiary of Wild Republic, based on the label visible in one of the photographs taken.

(talk) 13:36, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:40, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPS and OoS. User without any edits? E4024 (talk) 14:13, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:00, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would think, to take it out in this way makes it a copyvio Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:08, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:04, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

irrelevant for the subject; no release for portrait rights Ad Meskens (talk) 15:47, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:07, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

irrelevant for the subject; no release for portrait rights Ad Meskens (talk) 15:47, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:07, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

irrelevant for the subject; no release for portrait rights Ad Meskens (talk) 15:48, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:07, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

subject not very well visible Ad Meskens (talk) 15:48, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:08, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

subject not visible Ad Meskens (talk) 15:49, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:08, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Look at the image please. E4024 (talk) 15:50, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:09, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This user presents as "own" only other people's work, IMHO. E4024 (talk) 15:52, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:09, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All uploads by this nickname require OTRS, IMO. E4024 (talk) 16:30, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: logo above ToO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:10, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licensing: the copyright holder is the creator, not the person who uploaded it. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:50, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:13, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licensing: the copyright holder is the creator, not the person who uploaded it. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:51, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:13, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of Google Maps, it appears. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:51, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:12, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licensing: the copyright holder is the creator, not the person who uploaded it. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:51, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:13, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:57, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:13, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" by a newcomer. E4024 (talk) 18:04, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:18, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" by a newcomer. E4024 (talk) 18:04, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:18, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" by a rare visitor, duplicate and most probably OoS also. E4024 (talk) 18:26, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:23, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" by a rare visitor, duplicate and most probably also OoS. E4024 (talk) 18:26, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:23, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a {{Tasnim}} work. Original source should be provided. Please note the small credit to Leader.ir at the lower left corner of the image at [1]. Leader.ir does not publish its content under a free license. 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:26, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:24, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by IGE as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Colorization work is modern (my own, © 2014) and not public domain. Please revert to the black and white image which is public domain
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:35, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Colorization work is very likely creative enough to be protected. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:37, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file looks to be a derivative and I doubt whether the copyright holder of the original work has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:51, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Besides the copyright issue, this is an extremely low-quality, unsharp image. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:28, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file looks to be a derivative and I doubt whether the copyright holder of the original work has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 12:08, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Besides the copyright issue, this low-quality image of an information plate where the text is not even fully in the picture seems to be of little potential use (out of COM:SCOPE). --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:33, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own wok" without EXIF. IMHO we should delete all uploads of this occasional visitor. E4024 (talk) 15:54, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:48, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Location can not be determined. No discription. No categorization possible. MSeses (talk) 13:20, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:23, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

неверное перенаправление 79.126.9.12 18:10, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:22, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

loading error Slavic frontier (talk) 00:20, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Image loads fine for me. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:26, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:26, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this image is not free, since it was taken from the Twitter user profile. https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1067486996988391424/VYxZsxVf_400x400.jpg Ovruni (talk) 03:01, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Actually this image can be used. It is CC BY-SA 4.0. See here https://twitter.com/ocram/status/1111959574515511296 So please remove the deletion request. Thanks! AniversarioPeru (talk) 18:05, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Has permission per https://twitter.com/ocram/status/1111959574515511296. --Gbawden (talk) 12:25, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Location can not be determined. No discription. No categorization possible. MSeses (talk) 13:06, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Location can not be determined. No discription. No categorization possible. MSeses (talk) 13:11, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Shared via whatsapp so doubtful own work. --Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

удалить мне он не интересен 80.82.181.229 19:23, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:23, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is "own work", but this looks like it was copied from the BBC (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-46393399) but with logo removed - if this is uploader's own work but was already published, verification is needed. Peter James (talk) 19:37, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 20:55, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not based on any known source. Original Research. Kzl55 (talk) 09:39, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. "Original research" means nothing here and the file is in use. --Majora (talk) 01:35, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not based on any known source. Original Research. Kzl55 (talk) 09:41, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. "Original research" means nothing here and the file is in use. --Majora (talk) 01:35, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original research derived from deleted file Horn70ad.png Kzl55 (talk) 09:45, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. "Original research" means nothing here and the file is in use. --Majora (talk) 01:35, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not based on any known source. Original Research. Kzl55 (talk) 09:45, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. "Original Research" means nothing here and the file is heavily used. --Majora (talk) 01:34, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Location can not be determined. No discription. No categorization possible. MSeses (talk) 12:35, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 01:33, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Location can not be determined. No discription. No categorization possible. MSeses (talk) 13:03, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 01:33, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Location can not be determined. No discription. No categorization possible. MSeses (talk) 13:04, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 01:33, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Location can not be determined. No discription. No categorization possible. MSeses (talk) 13:05, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 01:33, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used. Who is he? In scope? E4024 (talk) 14:06, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Appears to be w:Riad al-Turk. Probably useful for something. No reason to delete it. --Majora (talk) 03:45, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with insource:"http://arabic.khamenei.ir"

[edit]

COM:CSD#F4, License review NOT passed: no evidence of a free license at http://arabic.khamenei.ir (see the discussions at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2018/08#Khamenei.ir copyright notice and Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with insource:http://farsi.khamenei.ir). I was prevented from creating this page with the proper syntax because it contained "http:".   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:57, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per Mbazri. The license statement includes a link to the main site which, in turn, includes links to all sites. Reasonable to assume that the license applies globally to all khamenei.ir subpages. --Majora (talk) 03:50, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Verletzt privatrechtliche Interessen. Keine aktuelle Relevanz mehr. Ecki1711 (talk) 19:33, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion that I can see. --Majora (talk) 03:54, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Verletzt privatrechtliche Interessen. Keine aktuelle Relevanz mehr. Ecki1711 (talk) 19:33, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion that I can see. --Majora (talk) 03:54, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Search "Rabbi Marantz" in en.wiki does not give anything useful. Is the photo in project scope? Taivo (talk) 12:34, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Léna (talk) 16:08, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out-of-scope clergy. Not very different than the one in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mehmet Fırat (Çokreşizade).jpg. (Well maybe a bit more handsome. :) E4024 (talk) 21:22, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. I could see this being used on any article about w:Vestments. --Majora (talk) 03:55, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original research based on deleted file Horn1915ad.png Kzl55 (talk) 09:37, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep This image is in use across several Wikipedias. If these projects decide that they want to use this map, it's not up to us to delete it. Also, there was no previous upload of File:Horn1915ad.png at Commons. Please provide the correct link to any previously deleted versions. De728631 (talk) 13:31, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@De728631: Per description [3] the file is a Finnish translation of a File:Horn1915ad.png, a file which was previously deleted from Commons. As such it falls under the maintenance category for speedy deletion as it "has previously been deleted under Commons deletion guidelines". It also falls under "not educationally useful" as it is self-created and not based on any known sources reliable sources, as per its description summary. I urge you to reconsider your vote. Regards --Kzl55 (talk) 20:32, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@De728631: It seems that Kzl55 gave us a confusing redlink above. File:Horn1915ad.png was indeed deleted by Jcb as a result of Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Ingoman. I think that deletion was unsupported by policy, though: Commons has no policy against original research and the delinker log shows that it was in use on multiple Wikipedia pages, and hence should have been protected by COM:INUSE.
CSD G4 does not apply, since it's only applicable to recreations of previously deleted content, but File:Horn1915ad.png was deleted six months after the last upload of File:Horn1915ad fin.png (and nine years after the first). Given that, I think COM:INUSE demands that the file be  kept. --bjh21 (talk) 23:12, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete - not for being original research, but because the copyright situation is unknown. The deleted original file was stated to be 'own work', but apparently rather a DW of an unsourced map. Without more information on the base map we cannot determine the copyright situation --> delete per COM:PCP - Jcb (talk) 16:00, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ingoman and Jusb: Can you help with the source of this map? --bjh21 (talk) 16:13, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Ingoman may no longer be participating in this project. [4] Anyhow, if there are copyright concerns, I'd like to see the map that this one infringes on. Unless there is evidence that the base for this file is unfree, I don't see why we should precautionary assume that it was not Ingoman's own work. De728631 (talk) 19:58, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Unfortunately, I don't have any knowledge on the source of the map. Jusb (talk) 10:49, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: AGF. --Yann (talk) 13:49, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio as Rider-Waite is not in public domain in its home country (UK) until 2022. Countakeshi (talk) 13:13, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:52, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio as Rider-Waite is not in public domain in its home country (UK) until 2022. Countakeshi (talk) 13:13, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:53, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]