Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/12/02

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 2nd, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is not the author's own work, it is stolen from an website, it should be deleted. Shanaya Pandey (talk) 06:43, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This photo has been downloaded from www.navy.mil.bd (the official website of Bangladesh Navy) without any permission from them, therefore the photo should be deleted. Shanaya Pandey (talk) 09:59, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is not the author's own work, the photo is actually downloaded from www.navy.mil.bd (may be the photo is not available now in the site though it can be sured that the photo is not the author's own work) and therefore it should be deleted. Shanaya Pandey (talk) 10:05, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This photo was downloaded from www.navy.mil.bd website. Link:https://www.navy.mil.bd/former_chief.php. Saeed Hossain (talk) 09:02, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@User:NahidSultan|নাহিদ ভাই]], এই ছবিটি এই লিঙ্ক https://www.navy.mil.bd/former_chief.php থেকে ডাউনলোড করা। Saeed Hossain (talk) 09:06, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Nahid, this photo was dowloaded from this link:https://www.navy.mil.bd/former_chief.php. It must be deleted. Saeed Hossain (talk) 09:07, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Moheen, This photo was downloded from this link:https://www.navy.mil.bd/former_chief.php. It should be deleted. Saeed Hossain (talk) 09:08, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- ~ Nahid Talk 09:14, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied image not my own work King Rishab Dugar (talk) 16:42, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 19:42, 2 Dezember 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: Clearly states Google Earth - Not "own work" as claimed --Krdbot 02:05, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 18:11, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy-deleted as duplicate of a copyvio-deleted image. --Túrelio (talk) 07:19, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty cat ComputerHotline (talk) 20:27, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, author's request. --Achim (talk) 21:15, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Lucky Ambago Purok Otso

[edit]

The files listed above are various images uploaded by User:Lucky Ambago Purok Otso, which stated “All Rights Reserved” and contradicts the facts that these files are licensed under CC-BY-SA-4.0. These files should therefore be deleted according to COM:PCP, unless the uploader removes such contradictory descriptions.--廣九直通車 (talk) 06:58, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Response

Are you going to delete my files with stated "All Rights Reserved in its text? How about I will going to edit all files with removing "All Rights Reserved" in its text? I will edit it as quickly as possible.Lucky Ambago Purok Otso (talk) 00:09, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also I will removed any kind of contradictions as soon as possible to avoid deletion.Lucky Ambago Purok Otso (talk) 00:12, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
To 廣九直通車

Done removing all files with "All Rights Reserved" and contradictory descriptions. It should be kept this time. Lucky Ambago Purok Otso (talk) 00:27, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Lucky Ambago Purok Otso: Thank you, and glad to hear about your efforts. As the problem raised in the deletion request is solved, I think the deletion request is good to be closed. You may find an administrator to close this deletion request.廣九直通車 (talk) 10:34, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
To all administrators who interested to close this deletion request

Kindly please remove this deletion request following my removing all files with "All Rights Reserved" in its text above so that my files will be kept this time. Salamat.Lucky Ambago Purok Otso (talk) 12:06, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very shy to talk one or more administrators in this website. Salamat. Lucky Ambago Purok Otso (talk) 12:07, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: files fixed, nomination withdrawn. --4nn1l2 (talk) 22:32, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this file has wrong. Tangjunwen CN (talk) 06:24, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:37, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unwanted file — Preceding unsigned comment added by HutheMeow (talk • contribs) 2018-11-29T06:10:20‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion specified. --Jcb (talk) 01:01, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete these files because I am unhappy with quality of many of them and I don't want these to be uploaded anymore HutheMeow (talk) 09:26, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:50, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some of these may be PD. Some will be copyright. "own work" does not apply. OTRS will be needed for those that are not PD.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 03:48, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:00, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image has watermark saying Copyright Johan Troch Clarkcj12 (talk) 04:52, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:21, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Guinadon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

historical images, unlikely to be own works

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:24, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:02, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Guinadon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works: screenshots (=Capture d’écran), historical images, taken from FB. Missing original author, source, date, and permission.

P 1 9 9   14:45, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep File:Naissance Denise Morelle.png, it is ineligible for copyright.

Deleted: per nomination - I se no reason why the cited document would be PD. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:11, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ya existe la categoría: Category:Holy Week in Jerez de la Frontera JT Curses (talk) 19:26, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: empty cat. --JuTa 03:01, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ya existe la categoría: Category:Holy Week in Jerez de la Frontera JT Curses (talk) 19:30, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: empty cat. --JuTa 03:02, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

When I uploaded this file I made an error concerning the date (should have been ca 1905 not 1880s).

I have uploaded the image again (to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Adelaide_horse_trams_and_young_conductors_at_Adelaide_and_Suburban_Tramway_Co._Kensington_tram_shed_ca_1905_(SLSA_PRG-280-1-4-62).jpg) with the corrected date and some minor expansion of the description. SCHolar44 (talk) 01:12, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:52, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

broken image Herzi Pinki (talk) 02:01, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:52, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All claimed as own work, but likely copied from anywhere in he internet.

JuTa 07:18, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:14, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

standart social media size without EXIFs : unlikely to be own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:05, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:31, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wenshow (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks like collection of promo photos, not own work.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Less certain about the last one, but the first two are almost certainly copyvios. Considering the user has uploaded nothing except copyvios, there's strong reason to believe File:Ruenna - CQ - 0024.jpg is one too. --Rrburke (talk) 19:03, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:19, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yoglav (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Various derivative works, logos, emblems, maps, photo montages. Unlikely to be ownworks - unclear copyright status -

Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:30, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Yoglav (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:16, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:17, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yoglav (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A number of images from different sources, all claimed as "own work". Some are clearly scans from old books and perhaps they are public domain if we knew what the publication was. A few of the recent ones are taken from the same camera and MIGHT be legitimate - the problem is if you have uploaded a lot of things claimed as "own work", how do we trust that these few things taken with the same camera aren't just stolen from the same source?

I have annotated each of the images. A bunch of them are supposed stamps and postcards that look photoshopped and give no sense of where the images are from. Some are scans of old work. A few are modern digital cameras images.


B (talk) 13:02, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9   17:23, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF data, uncertain copyright. Also poor quality, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 08:41, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:30, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF data, uncertain copyright. Also poor quality, easily replaceable. Yann (talk) 08:43, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:30, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:51, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:33, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:02, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:21, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Salai Thang Sian Mang (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Salai Thang Sian Mang (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Salai Thang Sian Mang (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:22, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope as spamming. All photos have been uploaded to Panoramio as advertisement for a real estate business in Mazandaran Province, Iran. Some presumably depict villas for sale or rent and some are random photos of nature. Please note that 1) there is no FOP in Iran, so architectural works (building facades) have copyright issues; 2) villas are not identified; i.e., their address is not known. (which county, city, or street?) all have coordinates.

4nn1l2 (talk) 16:20, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - they may have coordinates, but that on itself does not make these pictures in scope. --Jcb (talk) 12:28, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work as stated — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trade (talk • contribs) 2018-11-26T22:30:05‎ (UTC)

 Delete Appears to be cover-artwork, from a third party. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:02, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:31, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low qualify, unused, out of scope image. Even if we knew what this image is supposed to represent, which we don't since there are no categories and the title is nonsense, I'm sure we have better examples of it on Commons. The file history also does not give any clues. Majora (talk) 03:48, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:33, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The diagram in question is for a completely made up legislature and does not serve any purpose within the scope of the Commons whatsoever 2605:B100:F340:DE22:B4D2:EAC0:BC9F:CF39 06:47, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:34, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Uwekoeck (talk · contribs)

[edit]

wrong format+ text only : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:01, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:35, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this bad name Eduardas J. (talk) 13:15, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:37, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Courtesy deletion at the uploader request: the subject of the drawing is a sensitive theme (birthday wishes for the respective country) and the drawing could be interpreted as an illustration of an obscene gesture (see en:Mountza). Accipiter Q. Gentilis (talk) 13:40, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:37, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted poster B dash (talk) 13:58, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:37, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted work by Henri Émile Benoît Matisse (d. 1954) + no COM:FOP in France. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:09, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:39, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:39, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

error - should not have been uploaded Tyseria (d)(Sorry for my english !) 15:36, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:39, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:40, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:40, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:41, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ich als urheber bin mir jetzt nicht mehr sicher, ob ich bei dieser abbildung vorab die einwillung des mir unbekannten Bildhauers brauche. Sollte hier ein Zweifel aufkommen, bitte -sicherheitshalber- löschen. Danke Albert Gr. (talk) 15:53, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:41, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chris1302001 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:42, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:42, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yanirarte (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think artist permission via Commons:OTRS is needed.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:14, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:43, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blurry to be useful. The uncropped version and this other file are enough for this event. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:02, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:19, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Become small and blurred after cropping, unlikely to be useful B dash (talk) 14:24, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:20, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in France, permission of artist needed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:44, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:20, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image likely taken from the Internet (based on file name), and not uploader's own work. Senator2029 16:16, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:22, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image likely taken from the Internet (based on file name), and not uploader's own work. Senator2029 16:18, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:22, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ameur Jeridi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promotion, out of project scope. No educational value.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 16:59, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:20, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matteolio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

{{Nopenis}} Out of scope

Majora (talk) 19:38, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:20, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marko Kostadinovski (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://zenskimagazin.mk/galerija-vladimir-chadikovski-e-maz-na-godinata-za-2018-godina

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:18, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:21, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has an OTRS ticket associated with it, but that ticket may not be valid. It was added by User:Zureks (who does not seem to have an OTRS permissions), That same ticket is referenced in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alyssapallettplayboy.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alyssapallettdavidlam2.jpg. Both of those images were uploaded by the same user that uploaded this image. Both of those were deleted, World's Lamest Critic (talk) 23:45, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:41, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Derivative work in Japan. Batholith (talk) 09:50, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Wdwd at 12:28, 11 Dezember 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:WAON --Krdbot 20:02, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

marked as {{Copyvio}} by Krdbot. Instagram source, photograph appears to be 19th Century and from Mexico. Abzeronow (talk) 16:20, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Statement from uploader (put in the talk page for this DR) "Hi. This photograph is part of the Historical Archive of Tijuana, for what I consider the image becomes public property. Possibly I did not add a data well, I apologize in case it has been like that. I consider it important that the image be accepted, because it is important for the history of the city." Abzeronow (talk) 20:35, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no license since 2 December --Jcb (talk) 02:03, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The green logo on the left may still meet the threshold 淺藍雪 01:00, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:09, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not look like a selfie. The real phtopgrapher should be named and give his authorization through COM:OTRS. JuTa 06:45, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


this is too stupid — Preceding unsigned comment added by LaraKlartDj (talk • contribs)


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:11, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:59, 2 December 2018 (UTC) its my own work. i designed it on canva.com using a free template, and the image is also free. there is no copyright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Areejqzion (talk • contribs) 14:01, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination / advertising material. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:15, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/b/b9/20140319152805!Escudo_de_La_Algaba_%28Sevilla%29.svg converted to PNG and uploaded as Own work without crediting Commons contributors. Related to Commons:Deletion requests/Coats of arms uploaded by Hugito ddd. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:00, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:16, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:공유자전거.pdf

Unused PDF that could be better served in text on Wikipedia if useful — regards, Revi 11:35, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:17, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Greece 141.237.32.177 12:40, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:19, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Greece 141.237.32.177 12:41, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:19, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama --77.49.26.65 07:09, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Airport terminal footbridge. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:18, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep just a photo of half a bridge and half a building. No panorama violation --Alaniaris (talk) 13:52, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. as per above. Yann (talk) 19:29, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Greece 141.237.32.177 12:42, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per above. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:24, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's the wrong logo. We can provide the correct logo. Newsboyarizona (talk) 17:52, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:29, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am a Phillips 66 employee in the Corporate Communications department. This logo is not the same logo used on the Phillips 66 website. You can see the differences by going to the logo page here: https://www.phillips66.com/newsroom/logo-request-form or by visiting https://www.phillips66.com/ and viewing the logo at the top of the page. The word "Phillips" is stretched out in this version and a white background has been applied around the point at the bottom of the shield. Xmedheadx (talk) 20:37, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Logo updated from Phillips data. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:25, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erroneous identification: this portrait is NOT Turinetti, marquis de Prié. It is the portrait of George Villiers, 2nd Duke of Buckingham, painted by Peter Lely. The portrait has been electronically (intentionally?) cropped by a few centimeters to hide the name of George Villiers. Riyadi (talk) 19:55, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image is also visible at Category:George Villiers, 2nd Duke of Buckingham  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:22, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; misidentified person, existing image.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:23, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata mentions another copyright holder. Needs clear permission. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:57, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 15:04, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Greece 141.237.32.177 12:43, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:20, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:51, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:55, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 18:04, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:59, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 18:04, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:59, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:PS: resume. 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:43, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:59, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is copyrighted: "courtesy of Austal USA" Cobatfor (talk) 19:14, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:00, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 07:47, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect cropping MB (talk) 19:24, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please disregard. I was able to over-right the image with a correct version. MB (talk) 19:28, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: ok. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:02, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Shxahxh (talk) 19:34, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:02, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

broken file MNXANL (talk) 19:40, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:05, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:56, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:06, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:57, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:06, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:57, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:06, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Хоббит (talk) 21:49, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:54, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Хоббит (talk) 21:50, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:54, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book back cover, https://www.amazon.es/Die-Evolution-Sprache-Menschheit-Erfindung/dp/3406727492 Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:09, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:53, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:GD-web.JPG Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:10, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:54, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source shows a picture of a woman and not this man. Leoboudv (talk) 22:13, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:53, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source shows the image of a woman and not this man. Leoboudv (talk) 22:22, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:53, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Weary on COM:FOP here. Canada uses UK-style FOP, so it has to be permanently located in a public place to be valid. However, this is a parade float, which means it is only a temporary exhibition in the public. Does this apply? ViperSnake151 (talk) 22:35, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:51, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:28, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:49, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fmurillo26 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unsourced reproduction (photograph) with own work claim.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:46, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

-- copy from dr talk -- Porfavor no borrar imagen que lo falta para estar presentes porfavor dios lo bendiga gracias fernando (talk) 09:26, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:32, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fmurillo26 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The uploader seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding about Peruvian law on intellectual property rights: Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Peru. A picture is in the public domain 70 years pma

Discasto talk 21:43, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment As seen above, the uploader is pretty aware of the copyright violation and possibly most of the files were already deleted in previous deletion requests. --Discasto talk 21:46, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:42, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fmurillo26 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work, not public domain in Peru yet.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:48, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please Patrick Rogel the photos are for the best in history

Patrick Rogel Mr. Patrick, those photos of 4 photos are other authors who died 70 years ago,but they are unknown authors

, those images I leave in the history of Peru, to give a good biography page, those 4 photos were found in the military library of Peru in the center of Lima, and the photo of the last decade of 70, it was in the newspaper file the trade, those photo made in Peru, please do not delete those 4 photos, to make a good biography in wikipedia. In case of File:Fernando Belaunde Terry (1).jpg, it was taken in user fmurillo, which I found in the center of popular action party in downtown Lima center. they are correct in character square of peru, president of peru, fernando belaunde terry, those are from me, DO NOT ELIMINATE PLEASE PATRICK !!! Fmurillo26 (talk) 19:28, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All these images have been shot between 1962 and 1980 so are not 70 years old. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:05, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
photographic authors, began their career in the decades of the 40s, some authors died in said disease and left unknown. Fmurillo26 (talk) 01:59, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
please, in case of File:Fernando Belaunde Terry (1).jpg, the author was juan gallegos acco, they told me this agreement for wikipedia, square photo of ex-president fernando belaunde terry, was taken in my cell samsumg j7, to pass in wikicommons Fmurillo26 (talk) 02:15, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What do you need in that image — File:Belaunde y Morales Bermudez.png— [[User
Patrick Rogel|Patrick Rogel]

the, was the unknown author, found in center popular action supporter, members of partisan said that the author had died in 10 years, you do not know his name, he only said saved in the gallery old photographsFmurillo26 (talk) 19:48, 3 December 2018 (UTC) Patrick Rogel[reply]

- Patrick Rogel, already sent to the perimiso of commons for the claim of license by author deceased in before 70 years in lima Peru, and added the category, are of fernando belaunde and francisco morales Bermudez are the ex presidents of the republic of perúFmurillo26 (talk) 01:26, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:45, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo of a poem, apparently pinned to the wall inside some building in Germany in 2014. The photograph of the poem may be the uploader's, but we must assume that the text of the poem is by someone else and still protected by copyright. Which means the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 21:12, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:24, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is apparently an excerpt of an official German map from before 1945. It is claimed to be PD-USGov, which is utter nonsense of course. If we knew more about it (the year in which it was made mostly), we might be able to say more about its copyright status. Since we don't, we must assume that map is still protected by copyright, and the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 21:16, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:24, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a copyrighted work, and the uploader hasn't explained if he has permission. His other uploads are photos scanned from books, with random PD tag... Pibwl (talk) 21:49, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:16, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:45, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. xplicit 00:48, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. xplicit 00:45, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. xplicit 00:44, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative work from book covers and toy. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. xplicit 00:43, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 16:10, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. xplicit 00:41, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Poland for inside displays of artwork. Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Poland#Freedom_of_Panorama Ronhjones  (Talk) 03:57, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Agreed, but the exhibit might be old enough to be out of copyright? Per Google Translate, the description says that it's probably "pre-war", likely meaning pre-2nd World War, but without more information on its origins and creator, I suppose we have do delete the image per COM:PRP. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:12, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PRP, because there is not enough information about the object displayed to check if it is old enough. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:00, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Alex Spade as no source. Is the given source Antique Map. HISTORICAL RUSSIAN CHART. Wood engraving enough or not? JuTa 07:09, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • That is not enough. Where did it come from or published? Book, magazine, web-site, etc.? Or where is it kept? Museum, archives, etc.? Why did Roman map named Russian map? Are there evidences that it was created in 1890 or by anonymous (non attributed) author? Alex Spade (talk) 11:36, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: not enough information about the source. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:03, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Masur as no permission, but I cannot find an external source to doubt own work as claimed. JuTa 07:23, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No exif, name of the uploader different from the name of the author, profesional quality: copyvio is likely. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:06, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the reproduction of the work of photographer Svatopluk Brabenec …... He died 1982 ….. Still valid copyright. It is not the depositor's own work Romanzazvorka (talk) 12:12, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Romanzazvorka: According to the context and nickname, the uploader Brabka can be a wife or descendant (daughter?) of the author, i.e. she/he can be the inheritor of author's rights. --ŠJů (talk) 21:07, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@ŠJů: Yes. He (She) can be the inheritor of author's rights. He (She) can demonstrate Copyright (OTRS) --Romanzazvorka (talk) 22:23, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Work still under copyright. No permission. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:11, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor resolution will replace with same file with better resolution Marziopan (talk) 12:25, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please use the link "Upload a new version of this file" to upload a higher resolution version. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:14, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality Ваш Monoklon!! (Для заметок/Касса) 21:19, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 10:57, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is said to be an "own image" from 2014, yet the image description says it is from 1938, which is more how it looks too. Unless some clarifying facts are presented, we must assume that this is a still protected photograph by another photographer, and the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 21:08, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 10:56, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://truelinked.com/adrian.angelico Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:58, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --BrightRaven (talk) 10:55, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These are two 1942 photographs of the German photographer Hermann Harz, who died in 1988 [2]. The uploader apparently thought that because they were commissioned or published by the then German government (Reichsministerium Speer), they are in the public domain. But that is not the case, those are only in the PD if they are "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment (official work) issued by a German authority or court (§ 5 Abs.1 UrhG)" - see the text of Template:PD-GermanGov/en or Template:PD-GermanGov/de for the German version.

I don't see that these photographs were actually part of a decree or such, they were just propaganda images released by the government and as such not automatically in the PD. Since their creator died in 1988, they are still protected until January 1, 2059 and should be deleted.


Rosenzweig τ 20:58, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PS: File:Bild01-Lahntalbruecke-k.jpg is actually a re-upload of File:RAB-Bruecke-Limburg-1939.jpg, which was deleted for the same reason with Commons:Deletion requests/File:RAB-Bruecke-Limburg-1939.jpg in 2013. -- Rosenzweig τ 21:02, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:44, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation.The picture shows a photo taken from a book but there is not evidence that the book is in public domain (or authors agreed with the publication of the photo), despite the free license of the photo. Same problem of picture File:Polarization atom.jpg and File:Dielectric medium in electric field.jpg. Civitas13 (talk) 13:28, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 22:57, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation.The picture shows a photo taken from a book but there is not evidence that the book is in public domain (or authors agreed with the publication of the photo), despite the free license of the photo. Same problem of picture File:Boundary condition in dielectric meduim.jpg and File:Dielectric medium in electric field.jpg Civitas13 (talk) 13:30, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 22:57, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation.The picture shows a photo taken from a book but there is not evidence that the book is in public domain (or authors agreed with the publication of the photo), despite the free license of the photo. Same problem of picture File:Boundary condition in dielectric meduim.jpg and File:Polarization atom.jpg Civitas13 (talk) 13:31, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 22:57, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograph was taken by a professional photographer. But the uploader does not look like that. The file with the same name has been deleted with English Wikipedia. See en:User talk:Esfr#File permission problem with File:Blaire Reinhard Band.jpg. Y.haruo (talk) 14:08, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 23:06, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AccessGuy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical paintings. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep All obviously public domain and PD-Art. Frames look antique too. Abzeronow (talk) 16:26, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Fixed licensing. Abzeronow (talk) 23:47, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per Abzeronow. Strakhov (talk) 22:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AccessGuy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think heir(s) permission via Commons:OTRS is needed.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Christian Ferrer. --1989 (talk) 23:09, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is uploaded by mistake. It has already been uploaded on wiki commons. Here is the link of its original version: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%A1%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA_%D0%9C%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%83%D0%BC.JPG Please delete this image. Borjanaarsova (talk) 16:52, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 23:11, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete this image, because it has already been uploaded to wiki commons previously. The original image is on the following link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%A1%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA_%D0%9C%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%83%D0%BC,_%D0%9A%D1%80%D1%83%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%BE.JPG Borjanaarsova (talk) 16:57, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 23:11, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Spielbrett ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf daher nicht ohne Genehmigung des Verlags abfotografiert und veröffentlicht werden. Siehe auch Commons:Bearbeitungen. / This is a derivative work of the non-free game board. De728631 (talk) 17:24, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 23:13, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It appears to be taken from uptown101.com, which is a site promoting apartments. It is also watermarked, suggesting that the uploader is not the copyright holder. Parabirb (talk) 17:55, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 23:14, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je suis Raphaël Ferret et je n'ai pas donné mon accord pour que cette photo apparaisse sur Wikipédia Zädhir (talk) 10:05, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Taivo: the picture has been nominated for deletion again, by the same person, for the same reason. Could the new request be closed, please ? Thanks. It might also be useful to give a warning to this person. JJ Georges (talk) 11:30, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, permission from depicted person is not needed. Taivo (talk) 08:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je n'ai pas donné mon droit à l'image pour ce fichier Zädhir (talk) 11:00, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, I must add: here is no evidence, that Zädhir is depicted person. Unfortunately I must protect the photo. JJ Georges warned the user, at moment that's enough. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce fichier devrait être supprimé parce qu'il me représente, parce que je n'ai pas donné l'autorisation à la personne qui prise de l'utiliser. Parce que j'ai fait cette photo à sa demande de façon amicale mais dans un cadre privé, c'est à dire pour lui et uniquement pour lui. J'ai déjà essayé de demander à cette personne de la retirer en lui expliquant les raisons mais il a refusé. Je ne souhaite pas que cette photo de moi soit la première à être visible sur internet lorsque l'on tape mon nom dans les moteurs de recherche. Je ne souhaite pas que cette photo de moi soit celle qui illustre ma page wiki. Je fais un métier d'image et une photo comme celle ci, même si elle n'a rien de bien méchant pourrait malheureusement être nuisible à mon travail. en vous remerciant, Raphaël Ferret 89.157.19.59 20:41, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Enough already... There is no need to delete this photo, and no need for an authorization (public figure making a public appearance). If the subject does not like it, there is a very simple way of fixing the problem : that's replacing it on his wikipedia page. Which has just been done. JJ Georges (talk) 09:29, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Requests for the right to private life can only be valid if they are verified by our e-mail system (OTRS), andt that mean that the request will be successful. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:11, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was stolen from bdnews24.com and therefore it should be deleted. Shanaya Pandey (talk) 06:41, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This photo was downloaded most probably from www.navy.mil.bd (the official site of Bangladesh Navy), it can be the author's own work, this photo can't be a public domain, it should be deleted. Shanaya Pandey (talk) 10:07, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The person is ont famous nor he had indulged in any war with any country of his neighbor, the admiral is totally unpopular (though these things can't be the reasons for removing the photo from wikimedia commmons) and the photo was personally uploaded by the admiral, the author's page is not verified that it was run by the admiral himself, this photo is most probably taken from www.navy.mil.bd, and the site's permission is not granted it is confirmed, may be the photo had been downloaded from a popular news site of Bangladesh named bdnews24.com, the photo is not worthy of being a public domain, it should be deleted. Shanaya Pandey (talk) 10:11, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Moheen, this photo can't be a public domain. Shanaya Pandey (talk) 10:12, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Nahid, This photo is actually taken from Bangladesh Navy's official website without their permission. The link from where it was downloaded is:https://www.navy.mil.bd/former_chief.php. The photo should be deleted. Saeed Hossain (talk) 13:26, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Nahid, This photo was dowloaded from Bangladesh Navy's official site, the link is:https://www.navy.mil.bd/former_chief.php. You will clearly understand that it was downloaded from here, therefore it is not the author's own work and should be deleted. বিশাল খ (talk) 13:50, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; copyvio taken from the BD navy site, not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hartmut Hensgen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photo and drawing. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precautionary principle, insufficient information to keep the files. --Rosenzweig τ 18:30, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ich als urheber bin mir jetzt nicht mehr sicher, ob ich bei dieser abbildung vorab die einwilligung der/s mir unbekannten "Werkstatt/Herstellers" brauche. Sollte hier ein Zweifel aufkommen, bitte -sicherheitshalber- löschen. Danke Albert Gr. (talk) 15:55, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wieso dass denn? Panoramafreiheit, gilt auch für Kunstwerke und steht dauerhaft im öffentlichen Raum. --AxelHH (talk) 22:45, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ich kenn zu wenig von panoramafreite bzw. urheberrechten im www.--2003:E9:DF0A:D500:B494:D969:48A5:705E 16:43, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Freedom of Panorama. --Rosenzweig τ 21:23, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Greece 141.237.32.177 12:42, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Greece#Freedom of panorama - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:31, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep no notable architectural concept. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:27, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Per DYOLF77 and per previous cases with similar issues this is not a FOP issue, it is just an ordinary building. --Mates (talk) 19:44, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mates (talk) 13:45, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical coat of arms. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mates (talk) 13:45, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by זסזס (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos/drawing. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mates (talk) 13:45, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not described, but this is a DSS image. DSS images are copyright: https://archive.stsci.edu/dss/copyright.html Lithopsian (talk) 13:53, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I hope Lithopsian will understand this time.... an english version = «"Image created using the Aladin Sky Atlas software from the Strasbourg Astronomical Data Center and DSS (Digitized Sky Survey) data. DSS is one of the programs of STScI (Space Telescope Science Institute) whose files are in the public domain ( http://archive.stsci.edu/data_use.html )"». My images are not DSS images, but images created by my own using public data. --Donald Pelletier (talk) 23:50, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Donald Pelletier:  According to the site you are referring to (section Copyrighted data): “Certain data collections available through MAST are covered by copyright, and use of these data is restricted. The following collections are (...) copyrighted:
  • (...)
  • Digitized Sky Survey (...)”
I don't understand why would you see the data you used as in public domain? If I don't miss something the picture you created using DSS data might be COM:DW. Please explain your statement about DSS copyright status if I am wrong. For now  Delete --Mates (talk) 19:58, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Images produced by DSS are, indeed, copyrighted. --Majora (talk) 18:06, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1943 photograph, unlikely own work of uploader. Abzeronow (talk) 15:12, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Je ne sais si c'est ici que je dois répondre... Evidemment, je ne suis pas l'auteur de la photographie originale, mais elle m'appartient, et je suis l'auteur de la reproduction... elle ne comporte ni signature, ni mention de réserve de droit de copie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rocdejac (talk • contribs) 21:24, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, je peux seulement écrire un peu en français, mais je comprends bien. Comment savez-vous que la photo date de 1943? J'essaie de déterminer le statut de droit d'auteur de la photographie. @Racconish: Abzeronow (talk) 04:49, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

C'est écrit au dos de la photo: "à théo Bertaud... fidèlement, Edmond (signature), mars 43" Rocdejac — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rocdejac (talk • contribs) 21:05, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment @Rocdejac: il s'agit d'une photo de photo, d'une œuvre dérivée. Pour Commons, ce qui compte c'est d'apprécier les droits sur la photo originale. En l'absence de précisions, rien ne permet d'affirmer qu'elle est libre de droits. Cordialement, — Racconish💬 09:02, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Je comprends bien ! Mais rien ne mentionne une réserve de droits, ni au recto, ni au verso; il s'agit d'une photo de courtoisie dont on peut imaginer que l'utilisateur (Edmond Guiraud) en avait les droits de diffusion... Cela dit, je n'ai aucun intérêt particulier dans cette affaire, je trouvais juste utile de compléter un peu les représentations de cet écrivain, mais, suite à vos remarques, je ne l'ai pas inclue dans sa page wikipedia... où il est illustré par une caricature... Rocdejac (talk) 14:09, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 16:09, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ltosnar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All photos of automobiles dating back to the 1920s and 1930s, all marked as own work and licensed as CC-by-sa. Nevertheless, it is very unlikely that those are really “own work”—many images look like scans of printed material. Clarification of source is needed, as well as proper license (many may be in the public domain) or permission from copyright holder.

Ariadacapo (talk) 05:39, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(I copy here Ltosnar’s answer on his talk page) Ariadacapo (talk) 19:02, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

the Answer As employee of a Motorlet (1979-1994), based on a contract, I wrote two historical articles on Walter cars. That's why I got to use (and I get it) the relevant photos from the archive. Motorlet no exist from 1995. see: 1) TOŠNAR, Libor; SOMMER, Bohumil. Motorcycles, Tricycles and Cars (1901-1951). New Signal, Motorlet, 1981-2. 2) TOŠNAR, Libor. Sports and racing cars in the history of our business. New Signal, Motorlet. 1980 Best regards Libor Tošnar, 27 June 2018 Libor Tošnar
And it is true that those "glass plates" were created more than 70 years ago. I took it myself and picked out those interesting ones. --Ltosnar (talk) 11:02, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
@Ltosnar: Thank you for your answer. Unfortunately the problem is not with permission to access source documents, nor permission to use them on Wikipedia. The problem is that by posting photos here under a CC-by-sa license you are granting rights for their re-use by anyone for any purpose: this can be done only by the copyright owner themselves. Unless these images are in the public domain they cannot be published here without permission. To summarize, for each photo there seems to be 3 possibilities: 1) we can determine that it is in the public domain (the author must be identified for this); 2) you can obtain permission from the copyright owner (e.g. editor of book from which photos have been scanned) and forward it through the OTRS system; 3) The photo must be deleted from Wikimedia Commons. This is independent from the quality of your contributions here and on Wikipedia. I am very sorry. Ariadacapo (talk) 19:14, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

the Answer 2 1) Files: File:Walter WIZ (1921), kresba Milan Tošnar 1981.jpg is a picture of my father, Milan Tošnar, who died in 2016 and I am the general heir. As an heir, I am giving the right to use Wikimedia/Wikipedia. 2) Files: File:Walter Super 6 (1930) na vzpomínkové jízdě 1000 mil Čs. 2018.jpg is my photo on Sunday (16. 6. 2018, 18:08) at the National Technical Museum in Prague. See details for the photo. 3) all other Files: I got the photo from the owner (Motorlet Prague) to create the following works. As author and editor of the book from which the pictures were used: (1) Libor Tošnar, Bohumil Sommer: "Motorcycles, Tricycles and Cars 1901-1951" In: New Signál - Motorlet, Praha, 1981-2 and (2) Libor Tošnar: "Sports and Racing Cars in the History of Our Business" In: New Signál - Motorlet, Praha, 1980, 28 p. I agree to use pictures on Wikimedia/Wikipedia. --Ltosnar (talk) 04:14, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

the Answer 3 ad 3) I have corrected the date, source (Motorlet Prague) and author (unknown). Others can you delete, I do not need them. Sincerely Libor Tošnar --Ltosnar (talk) 22:03, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yesterday, you explained that you consulted Motorlet’s archives and scanned the glass plates yourself, and now you explain that they all were already published before 1947 in the EU? If those images come from a private archive, they are still very likely copyrighted. If they were published in the EU before 1947, please provide a source.
To be clear: the permission you obtained to use those pictures in a book in the 1980s is not a license to publish them here under your favorite license. Please do not make up copyright information. If you do not know the author, provide a source. If you do not know the source, please identify the author. Otherwise it seems unreasonable to keep images from the 1930s here. Ariadacapo (talk) 06:10, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

the Answer 4 I do not understand what you want me to do. The original pictures were created between 1912-1937. They were owned by company Walter (Walter, a car factory and aircraft´s engines)by the Kumpera family. Photo author is unknown. I do not know, where are the "glass plates" now. Copies from "glass plates" have been published maybe in many publications, newspapers and magazines that were published at the time. Why else would they be taken? After World War II, Walter was nationalized under President Beneš's decree without compensation. Attempts to restore property to the Kumpera family after the revolution in 1989 rejected the Czechoslovak state. The archive of these images has already been transformed into national ownership of the Motorlet National Company (1946-1995). In the years 1980-82, I used these images for the works mentioned, like hundreds of authors before me. I got the photograph from the Motorlet archive. From "glass plates" (negatives) are posibillity to make many copies - photos. That was the my contract with Motorlet. I will write the two publications and get the pictures. I chose them myself. I have about 200 of these photos. I want to use them for more articles on Wikipedia. Walter ceased making cars in 1951. Motorlet went bankrupt in 1995. In 1995, the company Motorlet was privatized as Walter a.s., and in 2005 the residual company was sold out - Walter Medica (healthcare), Walter Engines (aircraft´s motors), Walter - Deritend (precision casting foundry) etc. Land was sold and now here Penta Investments (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penta_Investments) built office and residential complex REZIDENCE WALTROVKA (https://www.waltrovka.cz/en/home/). The Czech Republic became a member of the EU in 2004. Czechoslovakia could not be a member of the EU in 1912-1937 because the EU did not exist in those years.

Now please, tell me what to do. --Ltosnar (talk) 10:02, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe other editors will have a different understanding, but in my eyes, the copyright status of those files can’t be determined and they should be deleted.
Like the vast majority of documents produced at the start of the 20th century these files are probably not in the public domain. The line of inheritance of copyright owners doesn’t matter. Without evidence they were published anonymously before 1947 in the EU, or published before 1923 in the US, or that the authors died before 1947, or without evidence that one of the countless complicated rules for copyight exiry applies, we can’t assume they are here for all to use. I am sorry. Again, maybe other editors will disagree, but I don’t see a solution to this. Ariadacapo (talk) 12:26, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

the Answer 5 The Archives of Motorlet are stored in the State Regional Archives of Prague (Státní oblastní archív Praha), Walter a.s. (1902-1996). During the transformation of the state enterprise Motorlet, a.s. into a joint-stock company Walter a.s. under the Law Archives Act, the State Regional Archives of Prague took over the documents, which were stored in the company archive Motorlet - see page: http://aplikace.mvcr.cz/archivni-fondy-cr/VysledkyHLEDANI.aspx?stranka=1 --Ltosnar (talk) 05:49, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Can you contact them to ask about the copyright status of those images? Ariadacapo (talk) 05:59, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
According to Mgr. Marie Tarantová, Head of the Department of Economic Operators' Units from the State Regional Archives in Prague, Archivní 4, 149 00 Prague 4, is a free copyright status.
Ltosnar (talk) 15:46, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This is great news. May you have them either state this on a publically-accessible website (best solution, as it would permit further uploads), or at least forward this permission through the OTRS system? -- Ariadacapo (talk) 13:23, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: With regret since there is no evidence that an OTRS ticket was ever sent in nor any statement on any website regarding the copyright status of these images. Without further information there really is nothing we can do as the copyright status of the work is in doubt. If we ever receive additional evidence I will happily undelete these. --Majora (talk) 05:26, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ltosnar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unfortunately, since the last nomination, a number of further files have been uploaded with the same problem. The source is indicated but there is no evidence provided for the license given (most of them CC-by-sa, a few anonymous-EU). Most of those images seem to have been produced in the 1920s and 1930s and are unlikely to enter the public domain before a long time.

Ariadacapo (talk) 12:28, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Walter, Tresoria, Ivan Hodač, Jindřich Knapp (1902-1947): Name of the fond (archive group): Walter, a.s. Stored in archives: Státní oblastní archiv v Praze (State Regional Archives in Prague) Place of origin of the fond (archive group) Praha (Česko) Time extent: 1902-1996 Accessibility: Archivní soubor je částečně přístupný pro nahlížení Creator of the fond (archive group) - agency: [Walter, a.s.]; Walter, a.s., IČ 00010561 Motorlet, národní podnik Motorlet a.s. Brief content description: Příkazy ředitele, oběžníky, vyhlášky, směrnice a pokyny, zápisy z porad, korespondence, komplexní rozbory, státní plán, zprávy o výsledcích hospodaření, významné návštěvy, kroniky, revizní zprávy, právní záležitosti, zřizovací listina, ochranné známky, závady a reklamace, spory, stížnosti, organizační směrnice, pracovní řády, smlouvy, závazky, negativy, fotografie (photo), časopisy automobilové, letecké, ceny ze soutěží, knihy protokolů, schvalovací dekret, stanovy, majetek, licence, představenstvo, filiálky, zaměstnanci, stávky, účetnictví, investice, odbyt, propagace, obchod, technický úsek, výroba The pictures are from the Walter archives stored in the State Regional Archives in Prague. The purchase of a digital copy of archival records is possible for CZK 25. Other

Pictures taken from public, digitized form of newspapers and magazines Auto, Pestrý týden, Lete Světem, Národní listy, Lidové noviny, etc. All these archival materials published before 1948 are free and publicly accessible. see Czech Digital Library: http://www.digitalniknihovna.cz/cdk/search/?sort=alphabetical&accessibility=public&doctypes=periodical And the best for the end

You let me delete the picture once(File:Walter WIZ (1921), kresba Milan Tošnar 1981.jpg). Milan Tošnar (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milan_To%C5%A1nar) was my father (1925-2016). In his life he painted about 1000 drawings. This is one of them. I am authorized to handle his inheritance by his own will. --Ltosnar (talk) 13:44, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding File:Walter Super 6B (1930), kresba Milan Tošnar.jpg, please forward permission through OTRS. For the others, I think everything has been explained in the previous deletion requests already. Ariadacapo (talk) 14:12, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I think Anonymous-EU (which is PD-anon-70-EU) applies to files from the newspaper archives, e.g. File:Gabriela Preissová (1937).jpg. But many other files, e.g. File:Walter Junior SS (1934), karoserie Uhlík 2.jpg, come from a private archive (as you explained above) and were not published before 1948. Ariadacapo (talk) 07:57, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: O potvrzení OTRS na výkresy mého otce jsem zažádal na mailu: permissions-cs@wikimedia.org. Ostatní licence jsem opravil dle podobných případů na wikimedia commons. I apologize for the misconduct of the original files.Ltosnar (talk) 17:26, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

__________________

Re-ordering the list of nominated files according to the situation: (please fix, this is tedious work and I may make errors)

Fixed:

Fix coming, OTRS pending:

Problematic:

please compare with File:Nürburgring Felle Vogelschau.jpg and File:Nürburgring Felle.jpg The route plan was also published in the magazine Pestrý týden, 1926, no. 4 (24.11.1926), p. 8--Ltosnar (talk) 14:44, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
These two files are just completely different, I don’t know what you want us to see there. If the magazine source applies, please fix the author, source, and licensing, and then move this item in the section below. Ariadacapo (talk) 18:37, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Archives from magazine, fixed licensing, PD-anon-70-EU likely applies

Files from private achive, no evidence for year of publication, PD-anon-70-EU unlikely to apply

→ source expanded by Ltosnar, but book apparently published in 2012, PD-anon-70-EU likely does not apply
→ source expanded by Ltosnar, but book apparently published in 2015, PD-anon-70-EU likely does not apply
→ source expanded by Ltosnar, but book apparently published in 2015, PD-anon-70-EU likely does not apply

Ariadacapo (talk) 08:26, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am currently dealing with these photos via OTRS, so I would like to ask the Commons sysops to not close this discussion for a few more days (I am a little bit lazy to add OTRS received template to all photos, the way in discussion is more effective ). --Michal Lenc (talk) 18:12, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Zažádal jsem 13. prosince 2018 o potvrzení Státní oblastní archív v Praze, že snímky 1902-1947 pocházejí z archívu Walter (Motorlet). I filed December 13, 2018, to confirm the State Regional Archives in Prague that the 1902-1947 images came from the Walter archive (Motorlet).--Ltosnar (talk) 14:58, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the three files * File:Tresoria 1.jpg, File:Walter 6 B, příčný řez (1928) A.jpg and File:Walter 6 B, příčný řez (1928) B.jpg, I don’t understand where the files were published before 1948 in the EU, so I moved the list items back in the bottom category. Ariadacapo (talk) 09:12, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ltosnar: please immediately stop uploading further files. You have a large number of problematic files right here. Please fix the existing problems first before continuing your imports. Ariadacapo (talk) 09:16, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ariadacapo: I have a few books (22 !), where the photos have been published. The source was either the State Regional Archives in Prague or the Walter (Motorlet) archive. The whole world can presented these photos, but Wikimedia Commons not. Is not it strange ? Finding those photos in old magazines and newspapers is a job for some years. And even the little child is clear that the photos were maked before 1948. Walter was only producing cars until 1948:
  1. Zdeněk Čížek: "Grand Prix Brno", NADAS, Praha, 1978, 200 s.
  2. Stanislav Minařík: "Automobily 1885/1940", NADAS, Praha, 1980, 175 s.
  3. Miloš Kovařík: "Velké závody - Muž pro Alfu Romeo", Novinář, Praha, 1982, 256 s.
  4. Graham Macbeth, Milan Jozíf: "Velký obrazový atlas automobilů", ARTIA, Praha, 1985, 608 s.
  5. Adolf Kuba: "Automobil v srdci Evropy", NADAS, Praha, 1986, 312 s.
  6. Adolf Kuba: "Atlas našich automobilů 2 (1914-1928)", NADAS, Praha, 1988, 236 s.
  7. Václav Petřík: Walter - AutoAlbum č.9, 735.ZO Svazarmu při UJEP, Brno, 1988, 64 s.
  8. Adolf Kuba, Milan Spremo: "Atlas našich automobilů 3 (1929-1936)", NADAS, Praha, 1989, 249 s.
  9. Milan Olšanský: "Prvních osm. Masarykův okruh 1930-1949", AGM-Gomola, Brno, 1995, 100 s., ISBN 80-900-594-6-5
  10. Zdeněk Zavřel, Alena Doskočilová: "Historie automobilových závodů 1930-2000", Computer Press, Praha, 2001, 150 s., ISBN 80-7226-449-4
  11. Miroslav Gomola: "Josef Walter - Akciová továrna na automobily a letecké motory", AGM CZ, s.r.o., Brno, 2002, 232 s., ISBN 80-85991-23-3
  12. Pavel Hanák a kol.: "75 let Masarykova okruhu ve fotografiích", Automotodrom Brno, a.s. a AMK Automotodrom Brno, 2005, 176 s.
  13. Alois Pavlůsek, Ondřej Pavlůsek: "České sportovní automobily", CP Books, a.s., Brno, 2005, 238 s., ISBN 80-251-0534-2
  14. Karel Řepa: "Závod do vrchu Zbraslav - Jíloviště", GT Club - Karel Řepa, Praha, 2008, 240 s., ISBN 978-80-902516-2-5
  15. Marián Šuman-Hreblay: "Encyklopedie nákladních automobilů", Computer Press, a.s., Brno, 2008, 222 s., ISBN 978-80-251-1718-7
  16. Hubert Procházka, Jan Martof: "Automobily Aero, Jawa, Walter, Wikov, "Z" (1905-1946)", Computer Press, a.s., Brno, 2009, 176 s., ISBN 978-80-251-1940-2
  17. Marián Šuman-Hreblay: "Autobusy", Computer Press, a.s., Brno, 2011, 240 s., ISBN 978-80-251-3455-9
  18. Marián Šuman-Hreblay: "Dvě století českých automobilů", CPres v Albatros Media, Brno, 2015, 160 s., ISBN 978-80-264-0716-4
  19. Zdeněk Král: "Motorismus v srdci Evropy", REBO International CZ, Praha, 2015, 304 s., ISBN 978-80-255-0987-6
  20. Jan Tuček: "Auta první republiky (1918-1938)", Grada Publishing, a.s., Praha, 2017, 356 s., ISBN 978-80-271-0466-6
  21. Marián Šuman-Hreblay: "Hasičská vozidla", CPress v Albatros Media, Brno, 2017, 216 s., ISBN 978-80-264-1388-2
  22. Marián Šuman-Hreblay: "Encyklopedie automobilů", CPres v Albatros Media, Brno, 2018, 272 s., ISBN 978-80-264-1852-8

Ltosnar (talk) 10:52, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about?? All we want to see is permission from the copyright owners --nothing else. Ariadacapo (talk) 13:06, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Further files

[edit]

Co-nominating those files for reasons stated above

Ariadacapo (talk) 13:04, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Permission from the copyright owners: owner from the copyright is Czech Republic (State Regional Archives in Prague). The photographs may have been taken by a Walter employee and were therefore owned by the Walter plant, owned by the Kumpera family. The property of the Kumpera family (Kumpera) was confiscated according to the Decree of the President of the Republic of 25 October 1945 on Confiscation of Enemy Assets and National Restitution Funds No. 108/1945 Coll. Factory Walter was nationalized after the II. World War in 1945. All property belonged to the Czechoslovak Republic. Now the documentation is stored in the state archive and "belongs to all the people". Archiving site: The State Regional Archives in Prague. See: https://www.mvcr.cz/clanek/archivy-a-archivalie.aspx?q=Y2hudW09Mg%3d%3d. The Walter Archive(1902-1948) is accessible and anyone can copy, photograph, scan, etc. For many photos (where isn´t author) I also mention where they were published(all photos are in the State Regional Archives), ie Magazines and Newspapers: Auto, Pestrý týden, Český svět, Motor Journal, Národní listy, Lidové noviny). The "community" also suggests deleting these pictures. Why? Are not they measuring "dual" meter here? Just look at hundreds of photos on the Wiki, for example: File:Hans Stuck aux Quatre-Chemins, côte de La Turbie 1936.jpg, File:Hans Stuck, vainqueur de la côte de La Turbie 1936 sur Auto Union V16 Type CD.jpg, File:Albert Divo vainqueur de la Targa Florio 1928, sur Bugatti Type 35B.jpg, File:Janine Jennky victorieuse de la Coupe de Bourgogne 1928, sur Bugatti 35C.jpg, File:Hans Stuck au Grand Prix de l'ACF 1934 (Auto Union Type A).jpg etc. It's just a coincidence that the all pictures are from the French authors. This is generally the case.Ltosnar (talk) 14:33, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the copyright information? We need a statement, on the archive website, or sent by email to COM:OTRS, that says "the copyright of those photos has expired" or "these photos are in the public domain". The copyright information. The copyright information. We don’t care where the photos have been or who owns the glass plates. Ariadacapo (talk) 15:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am constantly updating the sources where the photographs were published before 1948. I firmly believe that I will find adequate resources for all the photographs, so it is unnecessary to delete these photos.Ltosnar (talk) 05:17, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ltosnar: What’s your progress on this "constant update"? Also, in the last three weeks, there has been one more copyvio and now all your further uploads (e.g. today File:Walter - stánek firmy na Autosalonu (1922).jpg) are incorrectly tagged (if the author is unknown, we cannot state they died 70 years ago). Ariadacapo (talk) 12:34, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ariadacapo: I'm constantly looking for where the images were printed. I go to the state archive every week and study stored materials and prints - magazines. Again, I go to the archive on Thursday. I think I can almost find all the pictures. I've already found them a lot in the digital library.

To this today's Autosalon. How should I be tagged with an unknown author image that was published more than 70 years ago? PD-old is wrong?Ltosnar (talk) 13:24, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. If the work is anonymous and was published more than 70 years ago in what is now the European Union, you can use Anonymous-EU. You can use VisualFileChange to correct several files at once. Thank you for your continued research. Ariadacapo (talk) 16:33, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ariadacapo: The Case (Walter Automobiles Photos) is like this. All the "infested" photographs were published in the Walter Bulletins. It was a factory magazine that was published in 1928-1939. Every volume have 20-160 pages. Today, I have studied all the editions in the State Regional Archive, and I found the all photographs there. Bulletins especially with cars:
  1. Bulletin Walter, Vol. 1930, August, No. 6, 40 p., publisher: Akciová společnost Walter, továrna na automobily a letecké motory, Praha XVII - Jinonice
  2. Bulletin Walter, Vol. 1934, June, No. 6, 12 p., publisher: Akciová společnost Walter, továrna na automobily a letecké motory, Praha XVII - Jinonice
  3. Bulletin Walter, Vol. 1934, September, No. 9, 20 p., publisher: Akciová společnost Walter, továrna na automobily a letecké motory, Praha XVII - Jinonice
  4. Bulletin Walter, Vol. 1937, July, No. 4, 92 p., publisher: Akciová společnost Walter, továrna na automobily a letecké motory, Praha XVII - Jinonice
  5. Bulletin Walter, Vol. 1938, April, No. 2, 100 p., publisher: Akciová společnost Walter, továrna na automobily a letecké motory, Praha XVII - Jinonice

Bulletins are available at: The State Regional Archives in Prague. Come to Prague, you will not regret it. Prague is wonderful.

It would be best to release all the pictures without I have to record them again. Even if, I have them from the archive now in better quality. All sources (Walter Bulletins) I add to the photos. It's a pity you deleted photos from June 2018.

Ltosnar (talk) 17:41, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good work. I will go through the entire list of nominated files once again to sort them out, when I find time in the coming days. I will also file an undelete requests for those previously-deleted files that were featuread in the bulletins. Please overwrite existing low-quality files with newer versions if you have them. Finally, your final remark is unwarranted: your sourcing and licensing of those files were entirely fanciful. Really, given the length of this page and the recent overstep, you may have chosen a different wording. Ariadacapo (talk) 13:09, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Summary, April 2019

[edit]

Coming back at this problem, and summarizing the situation. The complete list of files with my recommendations are:

Keep, fixed by other volunteers

Keep, fixed, vefifiably sourced with magazine, PD-anon-70-EU likely applies

Keep, fixed, sourced to Bulletin Walter publication in the 1930s, PD-anon-70-EU likely applies

Delete Problem files, no fix provided in the last 3 months

Delete Not fixed in the last 3 months, no evidence for year of publication given, PD-anon-70-EU unlikely to apply

Delete Not fixed in the last 3 months, extracts from books, no permission provided

I am pinging Majora who handled the previous deletion request, Harold and Michal Lenc who helped with fixes already, as well as Ltosnar, the uploader. -- Ariadacapo (talk) 17:07, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: most with fixed license. Deleted a few. --JuTa 17:02, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WJDB (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:33, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I took several of these photos myself. What do I need to do to persuade you of this? I still have the camera I used as it happens. The others that I didn't take were taken from sites NOT claiming copyright. I admit maybe I am not expert in this field, but I would appreciate if you could help me through the process. Thanks. WJDB (talk) 16:20, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Are you sure of that? They are 10 other files put on deletion and among them only 3 blogs are not claiming copyright. Nevertheless it doesn't prevent you for claiming "own work" for the entire files you upload today... --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:27, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most. --JuTa 17:09, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WJDB (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works, but photos of existing photos and other images. Copyvio.

P 1 9 9   19:00, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 06:23, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author=Foto Jaroslav Balzar. Died July 19, 1945, 72 years ago. details on the web: http://www.casopis-foto.cz/jaroslav-balzar-fotografie/ (only czech)--Ltosnar (talk) 12:24, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: See other deletion request. --JuTa 17:11, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]