Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/11/26

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive November 26th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contested speedy under COM:CSD#G10, Files and pages created as advertisements; COM:ADVERT. Also, COM:CSD#U3.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 03:58, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I did not mean to delete anything. This page is not an advertisement. It is a Biography of an entertainer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Real Steele (talk • contribs) 04:26, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • @The Real Steele: Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 04:32, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@The Real Steele: Biographies are OOS.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 04:31, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Already dealt with. --Majora (talk) 04:43, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright fro here. דגש חזק (talk) 09:19, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: obvious copyvio per [1]: "כל הזכויות באתר האינטרנט, על כל תכניו וכל המפורט בו, כפי שהם מעת לעת, שמורותלעיריית נתניה בלבד.". ‎--4nn1l2 (talk) 13:30, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:מריים פיירברג-איכר.jpg– Same as דגש חזק (talk) 12:31, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:מריים פיירברג-איכר.jpg. --4nn1l2 (talk) 13:33, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, http://www.twoeggz.com/int/5680617.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:44, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:14, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Parce les ayant-droits refusent que cette reproduction apparaissent dans Wikipedia Ppad41 (talk) 09:17, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not yet in public domain (artist died in 2004). --Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:52, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:27, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:28, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle at 17:33, 26 November 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) - --Krdbot 20:04, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have uploaded this graphic new in svg format for a better quality! This file can be deleted! The new file can be found here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Deprotonierung_von_Acetylen_durch_Kupfer(I)acetylid_zu_Acetylid.svg Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:51, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As requested by the uploader as this diagram has been superseded by File:Deprotonierung von Acetylen durch Kupfer(I)acetylid zu Acetylid.svg. --AFBorchert (talk) 06:50, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

yes mistake

author request, i mistakenly upload my dad picture Avidreader92 (talk) 00:18, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 19:02, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File licenced under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0: [2]. Not compatible with Commons:Licensing. Ptolusque (talk) 12:15, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 13:00, 27 November 2018 UTC: File licenced under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0: [3]. Not compatible with Commons:Licensing. --Krdbot 20:03, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image file name is wrongly worded, needs to be reuploaded Mikeg1996 (talk) 03:56, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:39, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of Creator:Jan Ksawery Kaniewski Matlin (talk) 13:40, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, author's request. --Achim (talk) 20:25, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Errei o título! WikiJhonatan (talk) 21:47, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 23:33, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bay isaias king (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused COM:OOS image.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:58, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 11:35, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bay isaias king (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:44, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by The Real Steele (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, small, probably not own work, very little usable EXIF metadata, violate COM:ADVERT. See also Commons:Deletion requests/User:The Real Steele.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 04:43, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have marked them for speedy deletion under CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) per this edit.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 05:30, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Túrelio 26 Nov 2018. --Achim (talk) 21:22, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User intended to create encyclopedic content; see Commons:Project scope (GA3) Achim (talk) 21:11, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Herbythyme. --Achim (talk) 21:11, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality structure of acetylcarnitine; better PNG version is available (File:Acetylcarnitine structure.png) and SVG versions of one of the enantiomers as well. Wostr (talk) 21:39, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 11:22, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

peronal image, otherwise out of scope  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:02, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:24, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the contributor's userpage was deleted in August 2018 as misuse of Wikipedia as a web host. Out of project scope. xplicit 06:05, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:14, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful. Naufal Hanif Rabbani (talk) 06:44, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:15, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry and useless TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:47, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:17, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, unused photo without metadata. Out of scope and previously only used in a declined and now deleted autobio draft on enwiki. Sam Sailor 08:47, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:17, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-resolution photo of unknown person without metadata. Out of scope and not in use anywhere. Sam Sailor 08:48, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:17, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from author Alexander Bernhard is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:49, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:24, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo for non-notable magazine. Out of scope for Commons. Sam Sailor 08:51, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:17, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie, the uploader's only contribution. Out of scope, previously only used in a declined and now deleted draft on enwiki, and now not in use anywhere. Sam Sailor 09:49, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:18, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of person without article on any Wikipedia. Out of scope, previously only used in a declined and now deleted draft, and now not in use anywhere. Sam Sailor 09:50, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:19, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, unused selfie without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Out of scope and previously only used in a declined and now deleted autobiographical sandbox draft on enwiki. Sam Sailor 11:37, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:19, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chuatay (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Maps + historical images, unlikely to be own works, unclear copyright status

Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:42, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:25, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chuatay (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicates. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality, we have many others Pibwl (talk) 12:43, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:32, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quality way below COM:EDUSE, enough good alternatives at Category:Sugata Mitra.-- Groko Haram (talk) 13:05, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:32, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's blurry. fail. useless. Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 13:44, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:21, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image without obvious educational use Arnie97 (talk) 13:58, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:21, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This person was 91 years old in 2015. Shooting date seems to hide an incorrect license. PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:39, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:27, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date (person died 1990), any metadata, found at http://sevkavinform.ru/articles/people-honour/91664/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:48, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:28, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 I withdraw my nomination© All Right Reserved 2018. Only October 2018 and October 2017 photo is licensed under (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:10, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, my bad, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:01, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --Sealle (talk) 15:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:22, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:23, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:23, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:24, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:24, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:34, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:34, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial flag. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hsk10271 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused out of COM:SCOPE selfies or personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:09, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:10, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional logo Veracious (talk) 16:31, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete --Achim (talk) 19:51, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:25, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 16:46, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:25, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ajairapara (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope, personal photo

Afifa Afrin (talk) 18:23, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:37, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self-promo, with related items deleted from Wikidata Mahir256 (talk) 18:39, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:38, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COMMONS:SCOPE, fake logo with no sources or references that states the real existance of that "logo", which also uses the typeface of Coca-Cola brand. Sfs90 (talk) 20:57, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:30, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COMMONS:SCOPE, fake logo with no sources or references that states the real existance of that "logo". Sfs90 (talk) 20:58, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:30, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake election charts from User:TheHistoryKnower

[edit]

Fake election charts. These are not from a real-world election or a notable work of fiction. They are outside of the project scope of Commons. Commons is not free webhosting. B (talk) 22:07, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:12, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fjgrio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 22:41, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:18, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created logo used in self-promotional article at enwiki. Kinu (talk) 23:07, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:30, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising or self-promotion. ARR8 (talk) 23:11, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:29, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikipedianprofile (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Off-topic. See also Tf innovations.

Trijnsteltalk 23:27, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:41, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Comes from the source indicated, but no license specified here and no license compatible with Commons licensing requirements has been indicated at the source. Hammersoft (talk) 23:46, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 09:53, 3 Dezember 2018 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) - --Krdbot 13:58, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam (meme of Masahiro Sakurai) ZebaX2010 (talk) 02:58, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: http://spongebob.wikia.com/wiki/File:RealMasahiroSakurai.png --Achim (talk) 21:19, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:41, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The cover of a published book, the rights are owned by the publisher unless there is evidence otherwise. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 03:13, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:41, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Untrue claims about the author and licence, the photo has a watermark of the National Heritage Institute. ŠJů (talk) 04:13, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:43, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong file uploaded Imran.ningolai (talk) 08:08, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:44, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

potential copyvio - no info of the magazine being released under an open license Psubhashish (talk) 09:11, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:44, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, really does not look like own work. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per previous DR: FIFA WC trophy [1], FIFA WC trophy [2] and FIFA WC trophy (3):

Derivative work of modern 3D sculpture that is copyrighted by FIFA. The trophy was designed (1971) by Italian artist Silvio Gazzaniga, who died in 2016.

The trophy is also the main subject of the image so unlike other images (p.e. this) it can't be considered de minimis. - Fma12 (talk) 11:15, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:46, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per previous DR: Jules Rimet (1), Jules Rimet (2), Jules Rimet (3):

Although the photography was published by Argentine magazine El Gráfico in 1966, the main subject of the image (Jules Rimet trophy) is still copyrighted because its author, Abel Lafleur, died in 1953. Therefore any depiction of this sculpture will not enter to the public domain until January 2024. - Fma12 (talk) 11:28, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very small withoout EXIFs, unlikely to be own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:36, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Réponse de Patrbe : Bonjour J'ai extrait cette image d'une des 6 photos du podium des championnats de France de slalom (catégorie U18) que j'ai réalisées moi-même le 20 mars 2014 à Méribel , entre 13h53 et 13h54, avec mon téléphone. J'ai déjà publié sur wikimedia des photos d'autres podiums de ces championnats de France 2014 que j'ai prises à Méribel. Bien cordialement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patrbe (talk • contribs) 14:41, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non simple logo — Racconish💬 12:50, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:48, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s). Also out of Commons:Project scope. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:50, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adrianfp4 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo images, album cover, non-trivial logo. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:51, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Deepredk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Found elsewhere on the Internet. Seems stock photos so not own work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:05, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:51, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 16:31, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:52, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 16:37, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:52, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jules Chapoval died in 1951. Copyright violation.

Muttshilda (talk) 16:51, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:54, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gostaria de solicitar o remoção do arquivo pois estarei utilizando a mesma em fine art, de forma que não posso mais deixar livre para download no commons. vale ressaltar que o arquivo foi colocado para concurso, de forma que não estava claro para mim que eu não poderia apagar o mesmo posteriormente. Alfredo Mascarenhas (talk) 22:18, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: file uploaded in 2016. Ruthven (msg) 09:23, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to make it clear that I am not authorizing the use of my photos on the Wikimedia site. I'm feeling cheated because by entering the contest it was not made clear that the photos would automatically be available under Creative Coomons license in an eternal way. If I had known that the terms were these I would never have participated in the contest, I was misled. It's absurd that I can not delete my photos, this is a leonine clause. I have encountered using my photos on sites where I would never give permission, and I have discovered that they have paid from here. Do Brazilian copyright laws allow me to withdraw and how can you not? There are no pages that link to this file. you can not make me keep my picture here forever. I ask once again that they be withdrawn or unfortunately I will go to Wikimedia judicially. Alfredo Mascarenhas (talk) 00:49, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody paid for the photos (this is absurd), and you uploaded them willingly selecting a free license. I do not see where you were mislead. --Ruthven (msg) 08:20, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. Abzeronow (talk) 15:35, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:44, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gostaria de solicitar o remoção do arquivo pois estarei utilizando a mesma em fine art, de forma que não posso mais deixar livre para download no commons. vale ressaltar que o arquivo foi colocado para concurso, de forma que não estava claro para mim que eu não poderia apagar o mesmo posteriormente. Alfredo Mascarenhas (talk) 22:18, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: file uploaded in 2016. Ruthven (msg) 09:23, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to make it clear that I am not authorizing the use of my photos on the Wikimedia site. I'm feeling cheated because by entering the contest it was not made clear that the photos would automatically be available under Creative Coomons license in an eternal way. If I had known that the terms were these I would never have participated in the contest, I was misled. It's absurd that I can not delete my photos, this is a leonine clause. I have encountered using my photos on sites where I would never give permission, and I have discovered that they have paid from here. Do Brazilian copyright laws allow me to withdraw and how can you not? There are no pages that link to this file. you can not make me keep my picture here forever. I ask once again that they be withdrawn or unfortunately I will go to Wikimedia judicially. Alfredo Mascarenhas (talk) 00:49, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: cc license is not revocable, our legal department will say the same. --Jcb (talk) 23:45, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gostaria de solicitar o remoção do arquivo pois estarei utilizando a mesma em fine art, de forma que não posso mais deixar livre para download no commons. vale ressaltar que o arquivo foi colocado para concurso, de forma que não estava claro para mim que eu não poderia apagar o mesmo posteriormente. Alfredo Mascarenhas (talk) 22:17, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: file uploaded in 2016. Ruthven (msg) 09:22, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to make it clear that I am not authorizing the use of my photos on the Wikimedia site. I'm feeling cheated because by entering the contest it was not made clear that the photos would automatically be available under Creative Coomons license in an eternal way. If I had known that the terms were these I would never have participated in the contest, I was misled. It's absurd that I can not delete my photos, this is a leonine clause. I have encountered using my photos on sites where I would never give permission, and I have discovered that they have paid from here. Do Brazilian copyright laws allow me to withdraw and how can you not? There are no pages that link to this file. you can not make me keep my picture here forever. I ask once again that they be withdrawn or unfortunately I will go to Wikimedia judicially. Alfredo Mascarenhas (talk) 00:50, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:45, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gostaria de solicitar o remoção do arquivo pois estarei utilizando a mesma em fine art, de forma que não posso mais deixar livre para download no commons. vale ressaltar que o arquivo foi colocado para concurso, de forma que não estava claro para mim que eu não poderia apagar o mesmo posteriormente. Alfredo Mascarenhas (talk) 22:17, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: file uploaded in 2016. Ruthven (msg) 09:22, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to make it clear that I am not authorizing the use of my photos on the Wikimedia site. I'm feeling cheated because by entering the contest it was not made clear that the photos would automatically be available under Creative Coomons license in an eternal way. If I had known that the terms were these I would never have participated in the contest, I was misled. It's absurd that I can not delete my photos, this is a leonine clause. I have encountered using my photos on sites where I would never give permission, and I have discovered that they have paid from here. Do Brazilian copyright laws allow me to withdraw and how can you not? There are no pages that link to this file. you can not make me keep my picture here forever. I ask once again that they be withdrawn or unfortunately I will go to Wikimedia judicially. Alfredo Mascarenhas (talk) 00:50, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:45, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gostaria de solicitar o remoção do arquivo pois estarei utilizando a mesma em fine art, de forma que não posso mais deixar livre para download no commons. vale ressaltar que o arquivo foi colocado para concurso, de forma que não estava claro para mim que eu não poderia apagar o mesmo posteriormente. Alfredo Mascarenhas (talk) 22:15, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: file uploaded in 2016. Ruthven (msg) 09:22, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to make it clear that I am not authorizing the use of my photos on the Wikimedia site. I'm feeling cheated because by entering the contest it was not made clear that the photos would automatically be available under Creative Coomons license in an eternal way. If I had known that the terms were these I would never have participated in the contest, I was misled. It's absurd that I can not delete my photos, this is a leonine clause. I have encountered using my photos on sites where I would never give permission, and I have discovered that they have paid from here. Do Brazilian copyright laws allow me to withdraw and how can you not? There are no pages that link to this file. you can not make me keep my picture here forever. I ask once again that they be withdrawn or unfortunately I will go to Wikimedia judicially. Alfredo Mascarenhas (talk) 00:50, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:45, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Philip J Fry (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:33, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Philip J Fry (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Cartoon Network is not the sole copyright owner and the YouTube license might be a mistake. An explicit OTRS permission seems to me to be necessary here.

— Racconish💬 12:47, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:47, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. Used in draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:41, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:41, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User manual. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:41, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Caleimedoscopio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:42, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mensajeriaargen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Obvious advertising by a delivery service. The file names and descs carry the message motorcycle courier was here and a phone number. Some of the images are per se not that bad and might perhaps be kept, so the question is: deleting all or renaming without redirect?

Achim (talk) 19:48, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:49, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unwanted file HutheMeow (talk) 23:14, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:51, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, low-res. Reundant to files at Category:Airbus A320 of Jetstar Airways. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not from that angle though. Keep for now. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unwanted file HutheMeow (talk) 23:15, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:51, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete these files because I am unhappy with quality of many of them and I don't want these to be uploaded anymore HutheMeow (talk) 09:30, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:51, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unwanted file HutheMeow (talk) 23:15, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:51, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete these files because I am unhappy with quality of many of them and I don't want these to be uploaded anymore HutheMeow (talk) 09:29, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:51, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unwanted file HutheMeow (talk) 23:17, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:51, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unwanted file HutheMeow (talk) 23:18, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:51, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unwanted file HutheMeow (talk) 07:19, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:52, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unwanted file HutheMeow (talk) 23:18, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:51, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete these files because I am unhappy with quality of many of them and I don't want these to be uploaded anymore HutheMeow (talk) 09:23, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:50, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unwanted file HutheMeow (talk) 23:23, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:51, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unwanted file HutheMeow (talk) 23:24, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:51, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unwanted file HutheMeow (talk) 07:10, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:52, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unwanted file HutheMeow (talk) 23:25, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:50, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unwanted file HutheMeow (talk) 23:29, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:51, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete these files because I am unhappy with quality of many of them and I don't want these to be uploaded anymore HutheMeow (talk) 09:46, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:54, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unwanted file HutheMeow (talk) 07:20, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:52, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unwanted file HutheMeow (talk) 23:30, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:50, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete these files because I am unhappy with quality of many of them and I don't want these to be uploaded anymore HutheMeow (talk) 09:24, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:50, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unwanted file HutheMeow (talk) 07:21, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:52, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unwanted file HutheMeow (talk) 23:40, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:50, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete these files because I am unhappy with quality of many of them and I don't want these to be uploaded anymore HutheMeow (talk) 09:25, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:50, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Compilation of copyrighted images, the lower right one from here[4], and I recognise the bird from a book, which I sadly don't remember the name of. FunkMonk (talk) 23:54, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of scientific restitutions are shown in a lot of different sites, all inspired by each other. And basically, by the illustrations of the scientific articles describing fossils. We are not in the field of artistic creation but in that of scientific compilation, as when our texts quote our sources in the articles. But do what you mean right. --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 10:57, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well, one thing is inspiration, another thing is downright copying, which is not allowed. Unless the original images were free too, which is not the case here. FunkMonk (talk) 11:35, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio, per discussion. --Wdwd (talk) 08:52, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence Ackman licensed this under a CC license. Uploading editor generally confused at best. Pinkbeast (talk) 07:38, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. No permission is needed, because signatures are not protected with copyright in USA. Taivo (talk) 11:41, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I concur again with Taivo. Aviartm (talk) 02:51, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Taivo. Ruthven (msg) 13:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was extracted from a PDF document that is located on this site https://givingpledge.org/Pledger.aspx?id=157. The site lists their own copyright rules. There was no authorization given to create it in this manner. Deweylarks (talk) 23:55, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No permission needed, signatures are not protected. (see above). --Wdwd (talk) 08:48, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per EXIF: Author:Brian K. Mollenkopf, Copyright holder: (c) Blue Maple Photography. No permission. Sealle (talk) 21:15, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 10:35, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Resolution of image is grainy. 76.187.211.251 21:55, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 10:34, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeanbriac (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://hgagnondistribution.com/fr/titles/jeunesse/marc-en-peluche

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:43, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 10:32, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anxo fp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 22:47, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:31, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

missing camera EXIF, possibly a screenshot or a web grab photo, so unlikely to be "own work" theinstantmatrix (talk) 23:10, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, see COM:PCP. theinstantmatrix (talk) 23:19, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:30, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Romain27440 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 23:14, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 10:30, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising or self-promotion. ARR8 (talk) 23:39, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 10:29, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character. FunkMonk (talk) 23:41, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with deletion request on the cited basis (copyrighted character; photograph of a copyrighted item does not fall under Freedom of Panorama in the United States). Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 14:54, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:28, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, need permission from the painter B dash (talk) 16:17, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:11, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Theroadislong (talk) 17:39, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:05, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jedanilo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works of unclear copyright status

Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:53, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:02, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MarilynnHughes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

In my opinion the nominated files are out of scope, otherwise we need permiqssion from the artist(s) (see com:OTRS)

Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:17, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:01, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation to link in information John from Idegon (talk) 20:18, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:56, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work, photo of photo Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:23, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:55, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very poor quality, no usage Wanted (talk) 23:47, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:53, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy. FunkMonk (talk) 23:47, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:27, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriate content 100.15.84.102 03:23, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Free license image in use on multiple wikimedia projects for more than a year. ThomasSaxon (talk) 11:13, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:33, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

çiuhçiuohu 193.51.226.107 15:19, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 17:29, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work in Japan. Batholith (talk) 11:23, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:38, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy. FunkMonk (talk) 23:44, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:04, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work in Japan. Batholith (talk) 11:29, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:34, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the US. FunkMonk (talk) 23:48, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. xplicit 00:56, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have a VERY hard time believing that this file has been released into the public domain. The notes and lyrics may be PD, but certainly not that particular performance of this singer. It is a YouTube-rip which makes it even more suspicious. No documentation has been brought forward to suggest otherwise. Hansbaer (talk) 11:32, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:41, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Una Đorđević (talk · contribs)

[edit]
  •  I withdraw my nomination :in SCOPE.

Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:47, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The first image is in use in a Wikipedia article about the subject, meaning they can not be out of scope.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:29, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Patrick Rogel. Snezana Djordjevic is a Serbian journalist (with a 30 year long career), TV host, the editor in chef of a Serbian Cable TV Kopernikus and a host of a political talk show. Therefore, she has an article on Serbian Wikipedia, where these images are used. On those images she is represented in her working environment - in a studio, or with a Serbian notable persons she was interviewing, like Vojislav Šešelj (File:Snezana Djordjevic i Vojislav Seselj.jpg), Minja Subota (File:Snezana Djordjevic i Minja Subota.jpg), Bogoljub Karić (File:Snezana Djordjevic i Bogoljub Karic.jpg)... As a matter of fact, Serbian Wikipedia is lacking on a photo of an famous young actress Brankica Sebastijanović (File:Snezana Djordjevic i Brankica Sebastijanovic.jpg). The File:2017 European Athletics Indoor Championships - awards ceremony.jpg is used on Serbian and German Wikipedia. So, the images definitely are not out of scope. Best --Una Đorđević (talk) 20:32, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel Will you remove the tag now? --Una Đorđević (talk) 10:46, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Una Đorđević: Only an Administrator can close this discussion. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:55, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - withdrawn. — Racconish💬 14:26, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per {{FoP-Germany}}, German freedom of panorama does not apply indoors. OTRS-permission from sculptor (if dead, then from heir) is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:58, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

w:de:Dietrich Klinge - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:16, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nom. Strakhov (talk) 15:46, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kordás Ferenc has gone in 1993. I contacted the handler of his heritage, who is Mező Tibor, and I got the needed information and I fulfilled the license tags. The picture is used for a new Wikipedia entry under the permission of Tarczy Péter. Please don't remove the picture. Berdajeno (talk) 19:59, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You would need to have the photographer or their heirs to verify permission through Commons:OTRS. Commons doesn't allow Fair Use. You might be able to locally host on hu.wiki. Abzeronow (talk) 21:16, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:51, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Item has been re-photographed and replaced. This one is no longer needed. Mikeg1996 (talk) 03:52, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Where???? So over-write the file! Johnbod (talk) 13:52, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The other version was apparently deleted with Commons:Deletion requests/File:Two.putti.meissen-michael.greenberger.collection.jpg, so I'll keep this one. --Rosenzweig τ 11:26, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is performer? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well I have no idea who performed this audio file. The song is the national anthem of a defunct country Prussia. Prussia however is the legal successor of Germany. Since Germany's anthem is also in the public domain, the Prussian Anthem must follow the same rules. You can't copyright a national anthem — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zakimuse27 (talk • contribs) 21:20, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Performance of public domain work may be copyrighted. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:18, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Not enough information to keep this. Performances like this are protected for 70 years in Germany (50 years until a few years ago), and the recording could be older than that, but without any information I cannot really tell. So deleted per the precautionary principle. --Rosenzweig τ 11:21, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precautionary principle. --Rosenzweig τ 11:16, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Jcb (talk) 22:30, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precautionary principle. --Rosenzweig τ 11:13, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's blurry. fail. there is a better version in commons: File:Starr-050407-6243-Bonamia menziesii-flowers-Maui Nui Botanical Garden-Maui (24116814654).jpg Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 15:53, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:05, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate already avaliable at File:Hugo Mihelic.jpg Hladnikm (talk) 17:25, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:05, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's blurry. there is a better version in commons: File:Starr-060329-6818-Bidens micrantha subsp micrantha-flowers-Maui Nui Botanical Gardens-Maui (24741117262).jpg Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 22:02, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:04, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bogus license, no permission Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:46, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:47, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata, found at https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1000/1*_ymw9WVmUcze7MQffx6iQg.jpeg Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:43, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:52, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. The depicted person cannot be an author of the photograph. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:18, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: ARR on Flickr. --Gbawden (talk) 13:28, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical document. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep {{PD-old-100-1923}} as it's a 1778 document. Abzeronow (talk) 16:31, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per abzenorow. --Gbawden (talk) 13:07, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. It is said that it is possible to find evidence of the free license using the link in the description but unfortunately the link does not work anymore. Moreover "Richard Kerr" is credited as author of the photo and also as subject of the photo and this is strange. See also File:RichardKerr.jpg. Civitas13 (talk) 20:47, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; "Taken from his phone, and private Facebook page" - no permission. --Gbawden (talk) 13:06, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. "Richard Kerr" is credited as author of the photo and also as subject of the photo and this is strange. See File:Richard Kerr (racer) in leathers cropped.png for more info about licensing (it is said that evidence of free license can be found on a website but the web link doesn't work). Civitas13 (talk) 20:48, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; "Taken from his phone, and private Facebook page" - no permission. --Gbawden (talk) 13:06, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superior file exists Palosirkka (talk) 08:56, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:42, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploader seems not to be the author of this image, no exif data Migebert (talk) 17:21, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no subject (cultura appenninica? and the other side of Apennines?) Jumpy01 (talk) 22:19, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file is in use, hence I do not see the point of the nomination.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:54, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:44, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France. FunkMonk (talk) 23:44, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:59, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the US. FunkMonk (talk) 23:45, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:59, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the US. FunkMonk (talk) 23:45, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:59, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France. FunkMonk (talk) 23:47, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:59, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the US. FunkMonk (talk) 23:50, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:59, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for graphic works in UK B dash (talk) 16:12, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:02, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for graphic works in UK. Works created in 1982, copyright expired in 2052 B dash (talk) 16:16, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:02, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, need permission from the painter B dash (talk) 16:17, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:03, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, need permission from the painter B dash (talk) 16:17, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:03, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo lacking EXIF, exists already in the internet at bigger sizes [5]. Highly unlikely this is an own work. (Also the comet has being missidentified) C messier (talk) 15:49, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 21:36, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Walk Like an Egyptian as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: original uploader here, don't need this file anymore as it's no longer being used in any article. also inferior to File:Second Party System.svg B dash (talk) 09:37, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Potenitally useful/educational image. --Majora (talk) 20:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All other uploads of El Venado Yucateco (talk · contribs) were deleted as copyright violations. This is small photo without metadata and his/her last remaining upload, probably copyvio as well. Taivo (talk) 12:04, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 20:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non simple logo — Racconish💬 12:50, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Logo now falls under TOO. Previous version removed from history. --Majora (talk) 20:18, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Article 5 of the Chinese copyright law only exempt "laws, regulations, resolutions, decisions and orders of state organs; other documents of legislative, administrative or judicial nature; and their official translations;" The work of CNSA is not automatically in public domain nor licensed by CC-BY-SA. Mys_721tx (talk) 05:14, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per above.--Roy17 (talk) 13:48, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 02:47, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect naming, not required Psubhashish (talk) 07:37, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Error in naming immediately corrected by uploader. Redirect can be G7. --Majora (talk) 02:48, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work B dash (talk) 16:31, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete looks like a screencap.--Roy17 (talk) 13:45, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 02:54, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cc-by-3.0 license is not approved. http://cvrez.cz/publicita/logo-cvr/ states: "Logo (logotyp) společnosti Centrum výzkumu Řež s.r.o. v jakékoliv formě smí být použito pouze se svolením vedení společnosti nebo pracoviště pro firemní komunikaci." ŠJů (talk) 17:37, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 02:55, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation; source is listed as own work, but satellite imagery comes from somewhere with no indication of free licensing (watermark at bottom includes © ArcGIS) ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 00:32, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 20:54, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no permission (No permission since). Obvious cases already deleted. — Racconish💬 07:20, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Image appears here, an offical gallery site. Although an archive.org version is not available to assess dating, that a such a gallery would go to the Commons to source this image (whose aesthetic and technical characteristics just so happen to match other images found on their site), which just so happens to have been uploaded amongst unambiguous copyvios, is well beyond credulity. --Эlcobbola talk 21:12, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this person is not Moby Miha (talk) 09:20, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:SCOPE: unused, non-notable person. --Эlcobbola talk 21:18, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a duplicated image with a higher resolution than the image used for a wikipedia entry. Pablo San Juan Meléndez (talk) 13:40, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Close to consolidate to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Procurador del Común.jpg to address copyvio issue. --Эlcobbola talk 21:24, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 21:27, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + probably out of scope. --VIGNERON (talk) 12:50, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

トリミング無しで投稿しましたので削除をお願いします。 江戸村のとくぞう (talk) 07:33, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Courtesy deletion. Unused. Would have been G7 if done properly at the time. --Majora (talk) 01:18, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:17, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Architect Karl Peter Böhr died in 2017. No FoP for interiors in Germany. Code (talk) 17:29, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:19, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred image Brunei (talk) 18:47, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Looks good enough to display unless you have a better alternative. --Majora (talk) 01:19, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the subsequent uploaded unrestored original version from this one. This version is there available too. I see no educational value in this additional file. Ras67 (talk) 00:05, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

you have "adjusted" the levels which is a aesthetic choice, not in evidence at the original file. the educational value is maintaining the original version among all the yellow milkmaids. File:The Yellow Milkmaid Syndrome.PNG Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 03:20, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
We have the "original file" in the file history. Furthermore the colors of restored version were not changed. I've only utilized the whole RGB range. How do you know that the "pale" version is the "truth"? 10 seconds exposure time is extraordinary. Few light or other issues may happened. --Ras67 (talk) 13:07, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
you should not come along, overwrite a small thumbnail, "adjust" colors like Jan Arkesteijn, and then delete all other examples. it is bad image curation. we need all images online to curate the images. that is an "educational" value. your method is the lie. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 13:42, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"My method is the lie", interesting opinion, but this is not case. The "original" was saved in the file history! I want only avoid the overcrowding of the categories with zillion versions from the same image. --Ras67 (talk) 12:12, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
For me the “adjustments” are minor improvements and allowed. Now we can dispute about the threshold between good "minor improvements" and bad "digital restoration". --Ras67 (talk) 12:12, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, can’t write in German comfortably hence in English yet another time. Commons:OVERWRITE does not forbid minor improvements, and I see no merit to discuss the case in the context of Commons:OVERWRITE (as in the item just below). The crucial question is indeed: are Ras67’s changes helpful for representation of the artwork? Again, we don’t see Ras67 defending the changes but seeing Ras67 lawyering that no rule was broken by overwriting. Commons—like any other community—doesn’t encourage every action breaking no rule. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 20:25, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Keeping both is fine. --Majora (talk) 02:26, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Siedekurven_white.svg, but with transparent background. Should be deleted, since it is not in use.

There is not a single visible difference if you compare the SVG side-by-side. The PNGs have slight differences in the font, but this is a bug in the PNG-Generator since the diff of both files shows the text should be the same. Alex42 (Discussion) 19:26, 26 November 2018 (UTC) Alex42 (talk) 19:27, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected to duplicate. --Majora (talk) 00:59, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of non-free work. Wcam (talk) 20:01, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Calligraphy works are above TOO for Taiwan and there is no FoP for such things there. --Majora (talk) 03:56, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inaccurate usermade drawing of no use, out of scope. FunkMonk (talk) 23:50, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It's in use. It's in scope. "Inaccurate" is not a valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 03:57, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is author(s)? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The author Ganapavarapu Venkata Kavi lived between 1620 to 1660 as per historians. The first printed edition was made in 1889 and subsequent printing was done in 1977 by Andhra Pradesh Sahitya Academy. Except the preface for the latest edition in 1977, the original work is Copyright free and there is no bar taking it to PD

--Ramesam54 (talk) 18:21, 28 November 2018 (UTC)-[reply]


 Kept, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 12:25, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a copy of a drawing made by V W Clarkson in 1975 and published in "De Havilland Aircraft since 1909" by A.J.Jackson in 1987. The image has been reversed probably to hide the provenance but is clearly the same image as the entrance door is on the left side on the original drawing and real aircraft. If this was an original drawing of the starboard side it wouldnt have a door! MilborneOne (talk) 19:05, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no reply during half of year. Taivo (talk) 12:29, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]