Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/09/27
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Needs OTRS ticket to authenticate ownership and release from corporate owner. Bri (talk) 12:35, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 15:21, 27 September 2017 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:37, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Inappropriate redirect, Isaac can also referred to 2000 and the 2006 Isaac. B dash (talk) 06:02, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Ambiguous and cross-ns redirect. --Achim (talk) 20:05, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:55, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Highly unlikely to be own work. Looks like pro photo. MB298 (talk) 21:51, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Obvious copyvios should use {{Copyvio}}. --Эlcobbola talk 22:03, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Looks like professional photo. MB298 (talk) 21:55, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Procedural close - obvious copyvios should use {{Copyvio}}. --Эlcobbola talk 22:05, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Risk of copyright violation Tomlemot (talk) 13:22, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 21:03, 27 September 2017 UTC: Copyright violation: no source --Krdbot 00:35, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
personal image, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:37, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: previously deleted. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:58, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
I want new file Dejan Nikolić (talk) 22:40, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:54, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
personal images, out of project scope
- File:Rj*vamshi.jpg
- File:Rj^vamshi.jpg
- File:Rj...vamshi.jpg
- File:Rj,,vamshi.jpg
- File:Rj,vamshi.jpg
- File:Rjvamshi.jpg
- File:Rj.vamshi.jpg
- File:Rj vamshi.jpg
- File:Rj..vamshi.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:56, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 01:26, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Wrong file posted by accident Andrewcanigliatempus (talk) 16:28, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; higher resolution is preferred. --Guanaco (talk) 22:50, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
error of size of image uploaded Pastratopi (talk) 16:28, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 22:01, 29 September 2017 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: Non-free logo (above threshold of originality) --Krdbot 00:31, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
uploaded too fast Pastratopi (talk) 16:29, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 22:02, 29 September 2017 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: Non-free logo (above threshold of originality) --Krdbot 00:31, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Uploads too fast Pastratopi (talk) 16:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 22:02, 29 September 2017 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: Non-free logo (above threshold of originality) --Krdbot 00:31, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Uploaded too fast Pastratopi (talk) 16:31, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 22:02, 29 September 2017 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: Non-free logo (above threshold of originality) --Krdbot 00:31, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
В описпнии написано, что файл не автора Barbarian (talk) 09:01, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:50, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
в описании написано, что файл не автора Barbarian (talk) 09:01, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:50, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
в описании написано, что файл не автора Barbarian (talk) 09:02, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:50, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
файл не автора Barbarian (talk) 09:02, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:51, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
I will upload a better picture later Jha1393 (talk) 06:37, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 03:33, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
I have a better picture to upload. Will do that with the correct copyright Jha1393 (talk) 06:40, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 03:33, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Derived from (example) http://culturaniteroi.com.br/blog/imagens/1019_autor.jpg (exif available) Gunnex (talk) 07:07, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:48, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry deleted. If IN scope, needs permission (file was cropped) via http://www.rapp.com/pt/locations/sao-paulo/ = http://cdn.rapp.com/media/1463/about-leaders-abaeteazevedo-profile.jpg (exif available = copyrighted work by ""©2014 Jill Lotenberg"") Gunnex (talk) 07:50, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:48, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:José Luiz Zatti (copyvio of File:Roger foto.JPG + File:Roger foto 2.JPG). Last remaining file. Gunnex (talk) 07:59, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:48, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Editor 222. This is the 3rd reupload of the file as also File:Erik Bagger 2013.jpg (= tagged today with copyvio & cropped from a copyrighted work by "Asger Mortensen"). Gunnex (talk) 08:18, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:49, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Courtesy deletion of recently uploaded photograph not used in any articles, requested by uploader. The photographer, who regularely licenses valuable photos under a CC license and is happy to see them on Wikipedia, has removed this image from the set of photographs I uploaded and would appreciate it being removed from Commons as well as it shouldn't have been in the photoset. I believe it is in our interest to allow CC-licensing photographers to make mistakes without having to live with them forever, especially if soon corrected and with regards to images that are not used on any Wikimedia project. Julle (talk) 21:23, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
I am the subject of the photograph and I do not give permission for the photo to be on Wikimedia Commons. Please remove immediately.OK, let us focus on the first discussion. If it helps, I could make sure to have a more neutral image uploaded. Not that there’s actually an article about me to put it in, though.-- Francesca Phrannest (talk) 20:22, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: There are now two deletion requests for this image. I'd humbly urge anyone looking at this to not throw them both out because you disagree with the reasons stated in one of them. /Julle (talk) 21:11, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. BTW, the author seems to be Sanna Pudas, from which the permission would have been needed. Ruthven (msg) 20:32, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bashir Ahmed Jokhio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images.
- File:Kalankot13.jpg
- File:Kalankot12.jpg
- File:Kalankot10.jpg
- File:Kalankot11.jpg
- File:Kalankot8.jpg
- File:Kalankot9.jpg
- File:Kalankot7.jpg
- File:Kalankot6.jpg
- File:Kalankot5.jpg
- File:Kalankot4.jpg
- File:Kalankot3.jpg
- File:Kalankot1.jpg
- File:Kalankot2.jpg
- File:Jam.Nizam.Tomb4.jpg
- File:Jam.Nizam.Tomb5.jpg
- File:Jam.Nizam.Tomb3.jpg
- File:Jam.Nizam.Tomb 2.jpg
- File:Jam.Nizam.Tomb1.jpg
- File:Masque.Bodasar2.jpg
- File:Masque.Bodasar1.jpg
- File:Gori.tepmle5.jpg
- File:Gori.temple4.jpg
- File:Gori.temple3.jpg
- File:Gori.temple2.jpg
--ghouston (talk) 03:31, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Kalbbes (talk) 12:54, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:57, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
unused personal images, possible promotion, out of COM:SCOPE
- File:Syed fayaz Founder of Fzworld and ceo.jpg
- File:Fzworld founder .jpg
- File:Syed fayaz .png
- File:Fzworl logo.jpg
- File:Fzworld .jpg
Eurodyne (talk) 23:30, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:34, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
personal images, out of scope
Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:44, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:58, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status, mutliple authors involved, uploaded between 2007 – 2013, considering:
- File:Werner Schumann.JPG --> authored with "Juan Sarmiento"
- File:Paulo Leminski (1985).jpg --> film screenshot (as indicated) from pt:Ervilha da Fantasia (1985, directed by Werner Schumann, IMDB), authored with "Eduardo Pioli Alberti" (film editor)
- File:Werner schumann.jpg --> authored with "Werner Schumann"
- File:Willy Schumann.jpg --> authored with "André Gruby"
- File:Wernersch.jpg --> authored with "Werner Schumann"
Permission(s) per COM:OTRS needed.
- File:Werner Schumann.JPG
- File:Paulo Leminski (1985).jpg
- File:Werner schumann.jpg
- File:Willysch.jpg
- File:Wernersch.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 08:53, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:50, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nick Advadze (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF. Also per FBMD... or * grabbed from Facebook (probadly from https://www.facebook.com/vladimer.advadze). Considering also the nonsense added at source ("fdgfd") and author ("fdgf564"). Per available exif copyrighted works by "Mirian Kiladze".
- File:Option №1 The re-approval of the 3rd law of Newton.jpg
- File:IX shaft.jpg
- File:Option number 2 "Overcoming the 3rd law of Newton.jpg
- File:Veil on eyelashes or initiation of Rustaveli.jpg
- File:Bible writers.jpg
- File:Prodigal son of Mayakovsky.jpg
- File:Fashionable prosthesis.jpg
- File:Dream of a demobilization.jpg
- File:Vladimir Advadze.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 10:06, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:51, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Dj Crash Picture.jpg
- File:Dj Crash 1.png
- File:Dj Crash photography.jpg
- File:Dj Crash photo.jpg
- File:Dj Crash.jpg
- File:Dj Crash .jpg
- File:Blanco y negro.jpeg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:00, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
(1) Advertising/using Commons as a web host (2) Limited educational scope. See above for related deletion request.
seb26 (talk) 16:17, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:15, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ronald Keppler (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF. Per FBMD... or * or Original Transmission Reference[1] grabbed from Facebook. Uploaded in a row on 13.09.2016 for pt:Dauro Löhnhoff Dorea. Considering also [:File:Dauro Lohnhoff Dorea.jpg]] = grabbed from Facebook (2013). The logo File:Brasco logo.png is out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.
Btw, considering also
- here uploaded by 1-upload user Ann Myers (talk · contributions · Statistics) some days later and probaldy related to the uploader above, considering that he uploaded the same file via File:Dr. Dauro Löhnhoff Dorea.jpg
- ... and grabbed & cropped (watermark "Philip Falzer Fotografia" removed) from https://www.facebook.com/DauroDoreaAdvogados/photos/p.286692538177593/286692538177593/?type=1&theater (2014)
- File:Dauro Lohnhoff Dorea.jpg
- File:DD Julie.jpg
- File:Dr. Dauro Löhnhoff Dorea - Russian Embassy.jpg
- File:Dauro Dórea.jpg
- File:Dauro Löhnhoff Dorea Nu Skin.jpg
- File:Dauro Dorea.jpg
- File:Dauro Löhnhoff Dorea.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 17:38, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:53, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nestoresteves (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions (max: 112x148 px), missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Nestoresteves. May be in public domain by other means but relevant info (proper author/date of creation or first disclosure/country of creation information) must be provided to determine copyrights status.
- File:GenLealPujol.jpg
- File:GenFerreira.jpg
- File:GenSchons.jpeg
- File:GenMagalhães.jpeg
- File:GenCerqueira.jpeg
Gunnex (talk) 18:21, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Uploader indef blocked on ptiwki and part of sock farm pt:Categoria:!Fantoches de Edsondiehl. Sock related: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Luizkarla with similar uploads + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Renataangelica. Gunnex (talk) 18:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:53, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions (max: 152x201 px), missing EXIF. Uploader indef blocked on ptiwki = part of sock farm pt:Categoria:!Fantoches de Edsondiehl with similar uploads = e.g. Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Nestoresteves + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Renataangelica
Gunnex (talk) 18:25, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:54, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Renataangelica (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploader indef blocked on ptiwki = part of sock farm pt:Categoria:!Fantoches de Edsondiehl. Sock related: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Nestoresteves + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Luizkarla.
Gunnex (talk) 18:29, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:54, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution (100x75 px), missing EXIF + out of project scope: not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Gunnex (talk) 19:58, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:55, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juliana Dias Blues (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Per FBMD... or * or Original Transmission Reference[2] grabbed from Facebook. Uploaded in a row on 26.06.2015. Example: File:Dino Linardi at Sao Paulo show.jpg = grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=643125185713048&set=pb.100000467176050.-2207520000.1506542773.&type=3&theater (2013).
- File:Dino Linardi at Sao Paulo show.jpg
- File:Dino Linardi at show.jpg
- File:Dino Linardi Blues.jpg
- File:Dino Linardi.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 20:08, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:55, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emma dusepo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Emma dusepo, most likely all files video screenshotted from Youtube, like File:Tres puertorriqueno.png.
- File:Sertaneja.png
- File:Da terra.png
- File:Campanica.png
- File:Amarantina.png
- File:Dan tinh.jpg
- File:Vihuela and guitarra de golpe.jpg
- File:Khonkhota.png
- File:Chinlili.png
- File:Bandolin.png
- File:Pondar.png
Gunnex (talk) 21:07, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:56, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 00:11, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:10, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 00:12, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:10, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Scope, poor quality for camera shake. Categorizing (talk) 02:21, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:12, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
EXIF says "©2016 Washington State University" Ytoyoda (talk) 03:24, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 03:29, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:50, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JohnKroozie (talk · contribs)
[edit]personal images, out of project scope
Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:52, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:14, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:55, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:15, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Low quality, looks like screen shot. MB298 (talk) 21:55, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete COM:SCOPE/nonsense/COM:NETCOPYVIO - head of non-notable person cropped on to this image. Description of "President 2036" further suggests nonsense upload. Эlcobbola talk 22:02, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:05, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by OG123456789 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SCOPE/COM:NOTHOST - unused nonsense electoral maps "For my (uploader's) book" with no reasonably expected educational use. For example, File:2020 Presidential Election Prediction.png purports to be the outcome of Kanye West v. Donald Trump in 2020.
- File:Alternate 2020 Prediction.png
- File:2020 Presidential Election Prediction.png
- File:Alternate Election 2016 UESA.png
- File:Alternate History Cuban Presidential Election 2050.png
- File:2016 Alternate Election 2.png
- File:2016 Alternate Election 1.png
- File:Alternate History Election 2000.png
- File:Donald Glover vs Donald Trump 2020.png
- File:Alternate history 1992.png
- File:Alternate History 1888 Election.png
- File:Alternate History 1964 Election.png
- File:Alternate 2016 Election.png
- File:Alternate Election 1884.png
- File:Alternate 1876 Election.png
- File:Lesser of two evils.png
- File:Alternate 2016 Election 1.png
- File:Alternate History 2000.png
- File:Alternate History 1936.png
- File:Fear And Loathing On The Campaign Trail 2020.png
- File:Alternate History Electoral Map 2020.png
- File:Senate2018AlternateHistory.png
- File:Alternate History 2016 Presidential Election.png
- File:Alternate history US election 2004.png
- File:Alternate History Bay State.png
- File:Alternate History US Electoral Map 1.png
Эlcobbola talk 22:11, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:04, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
FOP violation. Mass deletion request page here: Commons:Deletion_requests/Burj_Khalifa [chinneeb|talk] 11:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Closed to keep discussion in one place. Jafeluv (talk) 10:37, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
NO COM:FOP in Dubai or the United Arab Emirates. Leoboudv (talk) 00:14, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Keep Withdrawn by the nominator. --Leoboudv (talk) 00:15, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:33, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation; this image should not be in the public domain 73.254.216.168 03:06, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:34, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Le nom est incorrect. Doxound (talk) 04:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: reupload. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:34, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
The historical photograph uploaded as a modern work. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:14, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
1) The article about the person has been deleted in ru-wiki for lack of notability; 2) there is no additional info about the photo, not even any kind of source that provides an evidence on who is the subject. As such, the photo does not have sufficient encyclopedic value. Furthermore, the copyright status of the photo is unclear, since no info on the author is available, and the info on date is clearly wrong. DmitTrix (talk) 05:04, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: reupload. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:35, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 05:06, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:35, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio, unused and promotion- Zoranzoki21 (talk) 05:15, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:35, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Blurry, low-quality photo kennethaw88 • talk 05:19, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:35, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely user's own work. Out of scope - unused personal image. NHHP (talk) 05:45, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:47, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Agnihotri Kuldeep (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unuseful personal Photos
- File:Kuldeep Agni.jpg
- File:Agnihotri kuldeep.jpg
- File:Agnihotri Kuldeep.jpg
- File:Kuldeep @gnihotri.jpg
- File:Kuldeep Agnihotri.jpg
- File:18556177 428690107487412 2715366401363853824 n(1).jpg
ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 06:38, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Kept files in use, deleted others. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:37, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
this not take by this user download by web 2405:204:E082:8D20:6644:73A2:937D:8C05 07:03, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - a correct license is provided. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:38, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
this is fake download by web 2405:204:E082:8D20:6644:73A2:937D:8C05 07:04, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - a correct license is provided. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:39, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
this is fake download by web 2405:204:E082:8D20:6644:73A2:937D:8C05 07:05, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Keep The original file is on Commons with proper metadata and uploaded by a trusted user. -- Rahul Bott (talk) 06:25, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - a correct license is provided. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:39, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
this is fake download by web 2405:204:E082:8D20:6644:73A2:937D:8C05 07:06, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - a correct license is provided. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:39, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
this is fake download by web 2405:204:E082:8D20:6644:73A2:937D:8C05 07:08, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:40, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
this is fake download by web 2405:204:E082:8D20:6644:73A2:937D:8C05 07:09, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:40, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable promotional logo Guanaco (talk) 08:06, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:41, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
File:AltiVoti(C) Logo - www.AltiVoti.com - All Rights Reserved - Lezioni, corsi e ripetizioni.jpg
[edit]Non-notable promotional logo. Also very low quality and unused. Guanaco (talk) 08:06, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:41, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
University logo, not user's own work Malayy (talk) 09:27, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:42, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
University logo, not user's own work Malayy (talk) 09:29, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:42, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
University logo, not user's own work Malayy (talk) 09:29, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:42, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
University logo, not user's own work Malayy (talk) 09:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:42, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 12:02, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:43, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 12:05, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:43, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope: w:Special:Undelete/User:Sushil Kr Sharma. MER-C 12:52, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:43, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
I think this file was previously deleted for being OoS. E4024 (talk) 12:43, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:23, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Poor Quality, Wiki is not a personal photo album 2601:40E:8000:445E:1401:A379:D603:201C 13:17, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete; downloaded by mistake GrammerCracker96 (talk) 22:04, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:44, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Poor quality, wikipedia is not a personal photo album 2601:40E:8000:445E:1401:A379:D603:201C 13:20, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:44, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
personal image, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:01, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: image is now in use. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:44, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
out of scope: provate fake picture Xgeorg (talk) 14:10, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:43, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:43, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by דרדסית אדומה (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:לוגו אגודה אופקי צבעוני גדול JPEG.jpg
- File:כחול ואפור.jpg
- File:Logo aguda.pdf
- File:לוגו אגודה קטן.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:45, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:46, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sergioledesmac (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Prediction.gif
- File:Mapping.gif
- File:Neural Network for Classification.gif
- File:Neural Network for Auto Association.gif
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sergioledesmac (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from software screenshots.
- File:Neural Network Simulation.gif
- File:Neural Lab Screenshot.gif
- File:WintemplaWizard.gif
- File:NeuralLabActivation.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:45, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:50, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Book covers and some personal photos. Used for promotional purposes.
- File:Sayyid muhammad sikander warsi.jpg
- File:Har Bidat Gunah Nahi By Sikander Warsi.jpg
- File:Masail e Shariat Jild 1 By Sikander Warsi -.png
- File:Sikander warsi.jpg
Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 14:28, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:51, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Brassopedia (talk · contribs)
[edit]personal images, out of project scope
Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:38, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:51, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by El chico de oro ( Jesus Lomeli Sanchez ) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:51, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
because i want to make another one Dejan Nikolić (talk) 14:46, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:51, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
i will make another one Dejan Nikolić (talk) 14:47, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
i will make another one Dejan Nikolić (talk) 14:48, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
i will make another one Dejan Nikolić (talk) 14:48, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
i will make another one Dejan Nikolić (talk) 14:50, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
i will make another one Dejan Nikolić (talk) 14:53, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
i will make another one Dejan Nikolić (talk) 14:53, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
a mime is uploaded Pastratopi (talk) 16:52, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- A what? Fry1989 eh? 16:56, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by User:Ronhjones. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:53, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Duplicte of File:André Darrigade, Tour de France 1962 (1).jpg. BaldBoris 17:12, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:53, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
File:הרגליים המחרמנות של קטי הכוסית שבא לי ללקק לה אותן לינוק לה אותן לשפשף עליהן את הזין שלי ולגמור לה עליהן.jpg
[edit]not appropriate 109.186.98.105 17:20, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:53, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 18:02, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:54, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image -- out of scope. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:33, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:54, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Is this really in scope? -- Jörg Haffke (talk) 18:55, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Yes it is in scope. In scope of naturally lit photographs and so in scope if illumination in photography, in scope of Boudoir photography (EN Wiki with an image of the same model), in acope of Portrait photography, in scope of Category:Female long hair, in scope of Category:Cleavage (breasts), in scope of Category:Women wearing lingerie and in scope of Lingerie and Category:Blue brassieres and brassieres. Funny, that someone registered only one and half hour ago (in Commons and any other WMF project, and with 25 editions already knows~how to nominate pages to deletion and knows the project scope policy page and how to link to it. Tm (talk) 19:06, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Tm: I don't understand what you are trying to explain to me. I've asked, whether the image is in the project's scope (and not whether it is in the right categories).--Jörg Haffke (talk) 19:18, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Jörg Haffke: And you open a deletion request to make a question? Did you not see the categories and saw that they were appropriate and in scope? In your opinion whay is this image out of scope? Please explain in more that 5 words, why do you think this image is out of scope. Tm (talk) 19:31, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Tm: I don't understand what you are trying to explain to me. I've asked, whether the image is in the project's scope (and not whether it is in the right categories).--Jörg Haffke (talk) 19:18, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:55, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
I would like to remove the company's logo. Visatcom (talk) 19:01, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: lacks permission. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:55, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Errato: Rifugio Castelberto invece di Malga Castelberto Paolo Deimichei (talk) 19:26, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:56, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
screenshot of copyrighted TV show Bultro (talk) 19:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:57, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Out-of-scope personal photo kennethaw88 • talk 21:03, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:57, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Out-of-scope personal photo kennethaw88 • talk 21:06, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:57, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Not own work. obvious copyvio Liên Khương (talk) 21:25, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: lacks permission. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:57, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Out-of-scope personal photo kennethaw88 • talk 21:27, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:57, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
unused image, Out of scope Ronhjones (Talk) 21:38, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:57, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope personal image. Not in use on user page either. Rahul Bott (talk) 21:51, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:58, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:58, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:58, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:59, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:58, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Error en la subida JuanMRB.pe (talk) 15:09, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. The file cannot be deleted on that reason, because it is used. Uploader's request is valid reason only during first week after uploading, here 6 months have passed. Taivo (talk) 08:17, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
delete on demand the uploader JuanMRB.pe (talk) 00:58, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Comment Juan nominated the file twice for speedy deletion and I declined both. Taivo (talk) 06:53, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: in use. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:51, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
There is no reasonable rationale that the author is the owner of such work Hakken (talk) 07:04, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: source file not found but cited websites are copyrighted. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:56, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Albertoisonfire (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in es.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:38, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:58, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Kafracma (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in es.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:40, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:58, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Muhammad Anugrah Agung Jiwo (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in id.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:52, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:00, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Asabria3 (talk · contribs) made userpage in ca.wiki, where he has no living edits in article namespace, and uploaded a photo about himself, which is used only in the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:55, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:00, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Il ne correspond pas au produit auquel il se rattache la photo n'est pas souhaitable Fanfan Po (talk) 07:56, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- If I understand the french correctly it says something like: the photo does not depict the named product.
- That is strange as it depicts a portion of 'Moules frites', i.e. Moules Mariniere with frites, and a glass of rose wine and a glass of pastis. If it depicts something else, why delete, when the name and description can be changed? If it is just a bad picture, and better ones exist, then delete it.--LittleGun (talk) 08:22, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:01, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused photo about Lebanese man. A George Karam is mentioned in en.wiki in en:Sequans, but as this is a French businessman and Lebanon isn't mentioned in the article, this is probably not the same man. Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 08:10, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:05, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
I think, that Commons does not need a logo for sample company. At least the file is unused. Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 08:12, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:05, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Low resolution, no exif. Unlikely to be own work Guanaco (talk) 08:12, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, found elsewhere online using Google Images. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:06, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Promotional, non-notable logo Guanaco (talk) 08:53, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:08, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Too much tilt, better version is File:Fairwater-1.jpg Sardaka (talk) 09:05, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:09, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
The uploder appears to be the subject of the photos, but we need permission from the photographer. Also these appear to be promotional-only images
Guanaco (talk) 09:09, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:11, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
überflüssiges Derivat Ralf Roleček 11:23, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: in use. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:15, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
According to https://www.groenesteijn.nl/boek-ge-van-der-pol-2017/ photographed by Jeroen Reijman, permission from the photographer or proof of ownership is needed via WP:OTRS. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 11:41, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:19, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Panoramio upload bot (derek2688) (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:GUNANG AGUNG BALI INDONESIA - panoramio.jpg
- File:GUNANG AGUNG BALI INDONESIA - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:GUNANG AGUNG BALI INDONESIA - panoramio (2).jpg
Files from something printing material. See also Panoramio user: derek2688's file --Batholith (talk) 14:01, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:24, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
self uploaded image. testing the WLA upload button Jamie Tubers (talk) 14:43, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:25, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
better resolution of logo to upload, impossible now because it's a mime Pastratopi (talk) 18:29, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
another same is uploaded Pastratopi (talk) 18:00, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use as well. Upload new version under new filename. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:46, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
False license, most probably copyright violation - found here, attributed to Caters News Agency. Vachovec1 (talk) 18:45, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, taken from the internet. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:47, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Anna Miller's uniform (pink) in Second Life (2012-01-22 22.36.22 by Ramona Forcella) clip.jpg
[edit]out of scope (educational use possible). Jörg Haffke (talk) 19:01, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Yes it is in scope. In scope per categories linked. Funny, that someone registered only one and half hour ago (in Commons and any other WMF project, and with 28 editions already knows how to nominate pages to deletion and knows the project scope policy page and how to link to it. Tm (talk) 19:07, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Tm: I don't count your opinion as relevant, since you've uploaded dozens of later deleted files.--Jörg Haffke (talk) 19:14, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Additionally the Anna Miller's uniform could be copyrighted.--Jörg Haffke (
talk) 19:15, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Clothing is not protected in the USA, and even if clothing could be copyrighted, this dress is below the threshold of originality as this is a simple white "shirt" with a generic heart and some generic pink skirts. Tm (talk) 19:28, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Tm: I think it must be free in the US and the country of origin, which is Japan.--Jörg Haffke (talk) 19:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Country of origin USA. You link to an article and you didnt even bother to read it? "The first branch opened in 1973 in Hawaii"? Read the website where it says it was started with an restaurant in Hawaii? Or that the japanese branch is Anna Miller’s Restaurant and Bakery opened in the Keikyu Wing Shopping Center Takanawa in 1983. We are conveniently located across from the Shinagawa Station. We are associated with the famous award winning Anna Miller’s Restaurant in Hawaii. In this two pages you can see that the uniform is the same and being that the first restaurant appeared in the USA, the country of origin is the USA. Tm (talk) 19:42, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Tm: I think it must be free in the US and the country of origin, which is Japan.--Jörg Haffke (talk) 19:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Jörg Haffke: Since you go this way of who´s opinion is more relevant, i could say that since you've uploaded 0 files i could say with all the right that "I don't count your opinion as relevant".
- Instead i will say that that with 1 767 401 editions and more than 300 000 files uploaded, even if the deleted files where 300 (which they are not) they would amount to less than 0,1% of files uploaded by me, the signal to noise ratio is more than optimal. So your opinion, of someone that started this account in less than 2 hours and has less than 28 editions in Commons or other WMF projects of what is or not scope is much less informed than someone that has an account for more than 10 years and much more editions and participation than you. Enough said of who´s opinion is more relevant. Tm (talk) 19:24, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep This image, Dirndl uniform of Annna Mirror's, is educationally important to show the historical origin of "cosplay café", the generic category of maid café. --Clusternote (talk) 23:17, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
- Historical origins of uniform of Cosplay Café / Maid Café
-
-
Anna Miller's uniform (1973–, the United States & Japan)Note: it became a model of Pia Carrot (1996–) and following cosplay cafés (1998/2000–).
-
Jokyū café's uniform (circa 1920s–1930s, Taiwan under Japanese rule) -
Maid café's uniform (2001–)
_in_Second_Life_(2012-01-22_22.36.22_by_Ramona_Forcella)_clip.jpg)
2114.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
_Logo_-_www.AltiVoti.com_-_All_Rights_Reserved_-_Lezioni,_corsi_e_ripetizioni.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_in_Second_Life_(2012-01-22_22.36.22_by_Ramona_Forcella)_clip.jpg){kind=link}
.18675.2.ajb.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
2114.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2114.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
2114.jpg){kind=link}
2114.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
_Logo_-_www.AltiVoti.com_-_All_Rights_Reserved_-_Lezioni,_corsi_e_ripetizioni.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Logo_-_www.AltiVoti.com_-_All_Rights_Reserved_-_Lezioni,_corsi_e_ripetizioni.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_Second_Life_(2012-01-22_22.36.22_by_Ramona_Forcella)_clip.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:28, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
out of scope (we have enough women with open legs on Commons).-- Jörg Haffke (talk) 19:28, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason. Not more at out of scope than any nude picture. "Ws have enough" ? So tell us how we should determine which one to keep and which one to delete ? With neutral arguments, of course. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:32, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- @TwoWings: What about COM:PORN / COM:NOTHOST?--Jörg Haffke (talk) 19:49, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Jörg Haffke: For someone that started editing two hours ago in Commons or any other WMF project and has less than 50 editions, you seem well versed in wiki codes and policies. You linked to this guidelines and scope policy and know how to ping? Strange, but in 10 years i never saw anyone new user being so prolific, that knows the policies and guilines, knows how to sign and ping, etc. But it seems you still do not know that Commons_is_not_censored. You open only deletion requests about nudity. Tm (talk) 19:58, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- @TwoWings: What about COM:PORN / COM:NOTHOST?--Jörg Haffke (talk) 19:49, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Image in scope. Nudity is clearly in scope of Commons. Or will Commons start deleting images of trains, cats, buildings as we already have enough images of this subjects. Please explain in more than a few words and cliches whay is this file out of scope. Tm (talk) 19:50, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- @TwoWings: Commons is deletings tons of nude photos without any educational purpose. You probably know this.--Jörg Haffke (talk) 19:53, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Comment "Commons is deletings tons of nude photos without any educational purpose". Please provide a complete list of nude images deleted in Commons in the last month? Or else your speaking from hot air, as "tons of photos" in Commons are thousands, as there are tens thousands of images in Commons, each month. Tm (talk) 19:58, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- @TwoWings: Commons is deletings tons of nude photos without any educational purpose. You probably know this.--Jörg Haffke (talk) 19:53, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: deemed in scope per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:31, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
No longer needed Cyberpunk 93 (talk) 22:24, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:37, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
This was a test upload for demonstration purposes. It should be deleted. Donrice1 (talk) 22:24, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:38, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Going to change the photo for the article DarkoPatino (talk) 22:47, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:38, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Wrongly uploaded with data / image Jmadhu (talk) 23:15, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Wrongly uploaded with data / image Jmadhu (talk) 23:16, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:40, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Wrongly uploaded with data / image Jmadhu (talk) 23:16, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:40, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Wrongly uploaded with data / image Jmadhu (talk) 23:17, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:41, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Wrongly uploaded with data / image Jmadhu (talk) 23:17, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:42, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Wrongly uploaded with data / image Jmadhu (talk) 23:18, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:42, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Wrongly uploaded with data / image Jmadhu (talk) 23:20, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:42, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect SVG version Wlofab (talk) 23:22, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:42, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
It has been replaced with an up-to-date logo. Jodie Y (talk) 14:21, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: unused promotional logo. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:53, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Poor and outdated representation Shingshay (talk) 18:16, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Uploader's request is a valid reason only during first week after uploading. Here 9 years have passed. en:Nicole Davis is a notable person. Taivo (talk) 14:48, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader is likely not the author, OTRS ticket was needed 9 years ago. Not the same person as claimed by Taivo. Therefore also out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:49, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Xdon elias (talk · contribs)
[edit]The Chinese fighter images are definitely NOT own work. Neither are the ships. The rest should be deleted under COM:PRP
- File:Chengdu J-10 doble cabina.png
- File:Chengdu J-10B.png
- File:Chengdu J-10.png
- File:Chengdu-J-10B-AESA-Demonstrator-1.jpg
- File:David Arellano vs Ricardo Zamora.png
- File:Francisco Santiago Reyes .jpg
- File:Vidrio-Romano-195x300.jpg
- File:Tipos de verdes.png
- File:Lautaro flag.svg.png
- File:Lautaro, picture of Pedro Subercaseaux..jpg
- File:Clase Taitao PS-G71 Micalvi.jpg
- File:Clase taitao.jpg
- File:Trenmilitar.jpg
- File:G-spot, clitoris and vagina.png
- File:Terrier chileno.jpg
- File:Chilean Terrier.jpg
- File:Lautaro genio militar.jpg
- File:Mosaico babilonia6 copiaw.jpg
- File:Etemenankilatorredebabel.jpg
- File:Delanteros-ISRP.jpg
- File:DefensasISRP.jpg
- File:DelanterosISRP.jpg
- File:PuntasISRP.jpg
- File:VolantesISRP.jpg
- File:MediocentroISRP.jpg
- File:DefensoresISRP.jpg
Liên Khương (talk) 07:43, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:57, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Low quality screenshots of non-free software.
- File:USBStart 5.png
- File:USBStart 6.png
- File:USBStart 2.png
- File:USBStart 3.png
- File:USBStart 4.png
- File:USBStart.png
Guanaco (talk) 08:41, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:48, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:LuckyShoe Monument
[edit]No FoP in Finland, but Freedom of panorama (section 25a(3)) does cover taking photos of artworks in or in the immediate vicinity of a public place, given that the reproductions may not be used commercially (and thus not uploaded to Commons), when the work of art is the central element of the picture. I leave to the discussion/closing admin the decision if deleting everything or keeping some image where the sculpture is not central.
- File:Ferro di cavallo (Tuuri).jpg
- File:IMG 2807 Tuurin kyläkauppa cropped C.JPG
- File:LuckyShoe Monument 1.jpg
- File:LuckyShoe Monument 2.jpg
- File:LuckyShoe Monument 2015.JPG
- File:LuckyShoe Monument 3.jpg
- File:LuckyShoe Monument on July 2013.jpg
- File:Onnenkenkä Helmikuu 2014 2014-04-05 12-22.jpg
- File:Onnenkenkä Tuuri IMG 2796 C.JPG
- File:Onnenkenkä Tuurissa(2).jpg
- File:Onnenkenkä Tuurissa.jpg
- File:OnnenKenkä.jpg
- File:Tuuri Onnenkenkä.jpg
- File:Tuuri.jpg
- File:Veljeksket Keskinen Logo.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ruthven (msg) 09:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:52, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Blurry picture of a COM:DW. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 19:21, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Not "own work" - COM:DW Ronhjones (Talk) 00:48, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:05, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
No easily obtainable evidence of permission that I can find. It may be free as it's a Linux distro, but I'm not downloading and digging through the 1.4 GB ISO to verify this. We need either a clear statement on the SharkLinux website or OTRS permission. Guanaco (talk) 08:44, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:05, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Camilleri95ant (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low resolution, no EXIF. Unlikely to be the uploader's own work.
Guanaco (talk) 09:07, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:05, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
.18675.2.ajb.jpg){kind=link}
.18675.2.ajb.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The advertisements are neither de minimis nor permanent. Leyo 09:14, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
.18675.2.ajb.jpg){kind=link}
- Tzz, tzz ... - Happier with the new version? --Ajepbah (talk) 09:41, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Well, I guess it's okay now. --Leyo 12:03, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- Hi @Ajepbah, it's a pity that you have resolved this request so quickly. This request is first and foremost harmful to the project! I think freedom of panorama should apply. It is in the nature of advertising on such pillars that it changes quickly and often, since paper is on the one hand no durable material, on the other hand, the "lifetime" of a poster is reached, once a certain date has passed. Therefore in accordance with § 59 UrhG it is sufficient for the copyrighted work to be in a public place for the duration of its existence (just short in this case). MagentaGreen (talk) 07:12, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- Well, I guess it's okay now. --Leyo 12:03, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: burred version, first version deleted. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:07, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
.18675.2.ajb.jpg){kind=link}
Potential copyright viloation Tomlemot (talk) 13:21, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:07, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Risk of copyright violation Tomlemot (talk) 13:22, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:07, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Historical painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:08, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Bom dia, tenho a mesma em auta resolução porem para o poste da pagina politica esta seria suficiente. grato por não ter excluido a mesma.
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:08, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
unliely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 16:02, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:09, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Probably a copyright violation, cf. Google Image search. Speravir 23:10, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:10, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
CyanogenMod may be an open-source operating system, the logo was/is not free for commercial reuse, see https://web.archive.org/web/20161224202104/https://www.cyanogenmod.org/terms-of-use Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:40, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Licensing#Well-known licenses. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Авторские права на афишу принадлежат её создателям Dogad75 (talk) 20:46, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Добрый день. Я являюсь автором данной афиши, что Вам необходимо для подтверждения, если нужно есть файл исходник в фотошопе. Как Вы можете заявлять без причинно на усомнения в авторстве?
- См. COM:PCP и COM:EVID: любые сомнения в авторстве и лицензии — за удаление файла с Викисклада, доказывать авторство и свободное лицензирование должен участник, размещающий файл на Викискладе. В афише использованы более 10 фотографий детей: Вы можете предоставить доказательства, что автором всех этих фотографий являетесь Вы? Например, исходники этих фото? С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 09:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- Да я могу предоставить, фото если это необходимо, фото будут направлены по адресу permissions-ru@wikimedia.org
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:27, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Низкое разрешение, дата создания не совпадает с временем событий, отражённых на фото (Новый год) Dogad75 (talk) 20:48, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Ответ на авторство
Разрешение достаточное, чтобы рассмотреть, что происходит на фотографии, если есть требования и критерия к разрешения прошу Вас их уточнить если нет, то прошу снять вопрос по разрешению. Указана дата загрузки фотографии, когда создавалась статья. Авторство принадлежит также автору фото, если у Вас есть доказательства или факты, что что фото принадлежит другим лицам, прошу Вас предоставить данную информацию. В противном случае снять данный запрос на удаление.
- См. COM:PCP и COM:EVID: любые сомнения в авторстве и лицензии — за удаление файла с Викисклада, доказывать авторство и свободное лицензирование должен участник, размещающий файл на Викискладе. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 09:26, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
У Вас еще остались сомнения?, в данный момент, фото направлены мной пользователем Pitrez0mail0ru, я и являюсь автором в службу, которая дает права опубликовывать фото permissions-ru@wikimedia.org.
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:27, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Участие сводного хора «Селена» в ежегодном областном празднике песни – «С миру по нотке».jpg
[edit]
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Встречается в Интернете до загрузки на Викисклад http://selenayar.ru/video/vip/201/ucheniki_eleny_sokolskoj/khor_selena_prinjal_uchastie_v_oblastnom_prazdnike_pesni Dogad75 (talk) 20:50, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Ответ за замечания
Здорово, что Вы нашли данную фото на сайте http://selenayar.ru/. Но если Вы не обратили внимание, что этот сайт ЕЛЕНЫ НИКОЛАЕВНЫ СОКОЛЬСКОЙ, о которой как раз и пишется статья. Если Вы более детально изучили данный вопрос, то увидели бы, что фото загрузил пользователь PiXtar, у которого электронная почта pitrez@mail.ru, а это моя почта. А видео размещено на канале Елены Сокольской.
- Авторские права на произведение, в данном случае, фотографию, принадлежат их автору-фотографу. То, что Вы — администратор сайта не говорит о том, что Вы — автор данного фото. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 09:33, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- Данное фото сделано с видео весом в 880мб. Я автор и фото и видео. Если необходимо видео будет направлено по адресу permissions-ru@wikimedia.org
I withdraw my nomination Пришло разрешение в службу OTRS, Ticket#2017092910004261. С уважением,
Kept: per special:diff/261754754. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Встречается в Интернете до загрузки на Викисклад https://vk.com/id109610323?z=photo109610323_456239403%2Fphotos109610323 Dogad75 (talk) 20:53, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Ответ за замечания
Да действительно фото встречается в интернете, но если Вы обратили внимание, фото на странице ЕЛЕНЫ СОКОЛЬСКОЙ, статья именно об этой персоне, также фото в вики складе было выложено с ее разрешения, и авторство она передала мне
- ...фото в вики складе было выложено с ее разрешения, и авторство она передала мне... — то есть автор не Вы? С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 14:38, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Пришло разрешение в службу OTRS, Ticket#2017092910004261. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 16:28, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per special:diff/261754223. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:33, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:55, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:44, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Screenshot.. No free license. Zoranzoki21 (talk) 05:19, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (for the icons). Also unused and out of educational scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:54, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyviol, since on TinEye.com the first image is from 2012 and his file was upload only on February 2017 (see: here) Holapaco77 (talk) 07:15, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:55, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Found at [3] in higher resolution. No permission; note the filename. Guanaco (talk) 08:04, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Missing evidence of freely license; please email COM:OTRS if copyright holder. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:56, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MifterBot as no license (No license since).
This DR is intended to give Toglenn a chance to add a license. The file is in use at the moment. As a regular bona fide contributor, it would be a shame to delete this file if it was simply due to an oversight on his part. Green Giant (talk) 08:44, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
I can't figure out how to add the license. Just delete it and I'll upload it again. Thanks Toglenn (talk) 06:15, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Toglenn: Wich license do you want? (the standard cc-by-sa 4.0?) We can add it for you --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:59, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Yes, the standard cc-by-sa 4.0 is good. Please add. Thanks! Toglenn (talk) 18:53, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: License added. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Where is the permission for the use of this image? Leoboudv (talk) 05:42, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment: In this other image File:Vlasta Parkanova.jpg a weblink shows the permission statement and the image but it is an older image from 2008/2009. I told Guanaco about this issue. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:44, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: Copyright © Ministerstvo obrany. Ruthven (msg) 13:31, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
1. wrong file name, 2. no author mentioned Mutter Erde (talk) 07:33, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:37, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
"J'ai moi même pris cette photo au Tibet en avril 2005. J'en suis le propriétaire et je désires que cette photo soit utilisé uniquement dans le cadre de (s) l'article(s) s'y rattachant sur le site www.Wikipédia.org. Cette photo est une modification de..." "Pour utilisation sur www.wikipedia.org" These terms seem to contradict the stated GFDL/CC BY-SA license. Guanaco (talk) 08:01, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: it has in fact been wrongly transfered from fr.wiki. Ruthven (msg) 13:32, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Source site is not under free license. Taivo (talk) 08:58, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:38, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
imagevio from http://globalmcom.com/images/000/004/196/4196/original.jpg — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:20, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:38, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The guide map is a copyrighted work. Batholith (talk) 16:38, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:40, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
No FOP for artwork or sculptures in the US Elisfkc (talk) 17:33, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:40, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
a picture of 60 × 80 pixel can't be used for anything: out of COM:SCOPE. Jörg Haffke (talk) 19:12, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Das Foto, aus dem ich auf Anfrage der Wikidata die vorliegende Datei als Ausschnitt erstellte, habe ich im Jahr 2000 bei der Meisterschaft der Deutschen Schachjugend selbst aufgenommen! Man könnte sie jedoch vergrößern, wodurch das Bild unscharf wird. --GFHund (talk) 19:33, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- @GFHund: Nicht persönlich gemeint, aber: Ist es überhaupt richtig, zehnjährige Kinder öffentlich in der Wikipedia abzubilden?--Jörg Haffke (talk) 19:48, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Es gibt sehr starke Schachspieler (auch als Zehnjährige). Lara Stock hatte einen rasanten Aufstieg zur Großmeisterin! Leider gibt es kein aktuelles Bild. Sie ist heute Ärztin. --GFHund (talk) 20:13, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. A picture of any size can illustrate an article. It is the only picture we have of her and she is notable, so it cannot by definition be out of scope. --Gereon K. (talk) 05:45, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
- P.S.: Aber zentrierter sollte der Crop schon sein. --Gereon K. (talk) 05:52, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
- Ich fand das Original aus meiner sehr alten Digitalkamera und konnte einen neuen Ausschnitt (zentrierter, 120 × 160 Pixel) erstellen. --GFHund (talk) 07:22, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
- Danke. --Gereon K. (talk) 10:18, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Gereon K.. Re-upload and replace if you find the centered image in the photocamera. Ruthven (msg) 13:44, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Derivative of non-free content; there is no FOP for 3D works in the USA FASTILY 19:21, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:41, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Copy of https://www.lightspeedhq.com/pos/retail/hardware/ Habertix (talk) 21:48, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:41, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Includes a logo that is a registered trademark or copyrighted by the Microsoft Corporation (the Windows XP logo) 173.96.209.130 20:30, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Kept. Trademark is not a concern for us. And copyrightwise, this is not the official Windows logo, and concepts (such as four colored squares forming a waving window) are not copyrightable. –Tryphon☂ 14:18, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Derivative of Microsoft Windows logo. file is in use, do not delete the file, please replace it with a new version. ■ MMXX talk 14:05, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept - that derivative doesn't seem eligible for copyright - Jcb (talk) 14:53, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
It has a non-free logo, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Windows_logo_-_2006.svg Editor-1 (talk) 13:58, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:47, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
This photo was likely taken before 1941 when depicted person was arrested by NKVD. So it's unlikely that given work is own work by uploader. Copyright might be expired instead, but currently there's no evidence on that. 90.191.76.154 12:38, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:47, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Likely copyright infringement; obviously a professional photo, with no support of claimed authorship by uploader, e.g. Commons:OTRS. The uploader has an apparent history with respect to images of Ming Bridges. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:MING BRIDGES.jpeg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ming Bridges promo photo.jpeg; log at [4]. TJRC (talk) 22:52, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Requires a formal license using the procedure at Commons:OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 13:48, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
This was meant to test something on the Visual Editor on en.wiki, and did not mean for it to be uploaded to commons (it's already a free image here, was using for example) Masem (talk) 21:00, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:21, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Files of User:Ingoman
[edit]- File:Horn0560ad.png
- File:Horn1100ad.png
- File:Horn1550ad.png
- File:Horn1300ad.png
- File:Horn70ad.png
- File:Horn1650ad.png
- File:Horn1915ad.png
- File:Horn1890ad.png
- File:Horn1730ad.png
Not based on any known source. Original Research --Kzl55 (talk) 11:24, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:16, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Panoramio upload bot (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Toyoda, Suwa, Nagano Prefecture 392-0016, Japan - panoramio - ☆Tomoaki Ueda☆ (2).jpg
- File:Toyoda, Suwa, Nagano Prefecture 392-0016, Japan - panoramio - ☆Tomoaki Ueda☆ (3).jpg
- File:Toyoda, Suwa, Nagano Prefecture 392-0016, Japan - panoramio - ☆Tomoaki Ueda☆ (4).jpg
- File:Toyoda, Suwa, Nagano Prefecture 392-0016, Japan - panoramio - ☆Tomoaki Ueda☆ (5).jpg
- File:Toyoda, Suwa, Nagano Prefecture 392-0016, Japan - panoramio - ☆Tomoaki Ueda☆ (6).jpg
- File:Toyoda, Suwa, Nagano Prefecture 392-0016, Japan - panoramio - ☆Tomoaki Ueda☆ (7).jpg
- File:Toyoda, Suwa, Nagano Prefecture 392-0016, Japan - panoramio - ☆Tomoaki Ueda☆ (8).jpg
- File:Toyoda, Suwa, Nagano Prefecture 392-0016, Japan - panoramio - ☆Tomoaki Ueda☆ (9).jpg
- File:Toyoda, Suwa, Nagano Prefecture 392-0016, Japan - panoramio - ☆Tomoaki Ueda☆.jpg
- File:Toyoda, Suwa, Nagano Prefecture 392-0016, Japan - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Non-free artwork from glass art museum in Japan [5]. Brooch artist is still living (Official).--Batholith (talk) 11:28, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Derivative works. --Y.haruo (talk) 16:09, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Small Image, no EXIF. B dash (talk) 10:10, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: no evidence of copyvio. Ruthven (msg) 22:24, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of permission that I can find. It may be free as it's a Linux distro, but I'm not downloading and digging through the 1.4 GB ISO to verify this. We need either a clear statement on the SharkLinux website or OTRS permission. Guanaco (talk) 08:46, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: actually we do have an OTRS permission. Ruthven (msg) 08:58, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
This photo is by Parikas as per http://www.ra.ee/fotis/index.php?lang=en&type=2&id=15155. So the author isn't unknown nor anonymous and copyright hasn't expired in source country (Estonia) where 70 p.m.a. term applies.
Secondly, "1915" as part of the image description at the archive database entry says that depicted person was member of a theatrical society in this year. It's not given as a year when given image was taken/published. It's safe to presume that photo was taken no later than 1918, since depicted person died then. However, currently there is no sufficient data about initial publication, which is required in order to decide whether photo is in public domain in US or Russia.
Thirdly, even if it was known to be in public domain in Russia, this is probably irrelevant here. Modern copyright laws are generally applied to modern territories (Estonian copyright act also says that it applies to works created in its territory or by residents of its territory; that is regardless of political history) and Parikas brothers worked in Estonia and its territory, mainly in Tallinn, so source country of the work presumably is Estonia. 90.191.76.154 09:37, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- I' m agree that every photo has the author. And I admit that the authors of this photo are Parikas brothers.
- But there is a direct indication when this photo was taken and for what reason: Content description Vilms, Jüri, Member of the Board of Directors of the Theater House of the "Estonia" in 1915. So it was made 2 years before November of 1917. So "This work is in the public domain in Russia according to article 1256 of Book IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation No. 230-FZ of December 18, 2006." and "This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1923." Hunu (talk) 15:15, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- As already explained above: this database entry doesn't really provide clear indication on when the photo was taken. There's also a separate database field for depiction date ("Time of event"). Unfortunately for given entry this field provides no useful information as it only says "before 1938". Now I found different entry about the same photograph. It explicitly says that the time of event is 19.02.1918. So, even if it was relevant, most likely this photo is not in public domain in Russia.
- To be able to tell whether this photo is in public domain in the United States it needs to be shown that it actually was published (not taken) in some source publication before January 1, 1923. Though, currently there'd be no point in looking for such source, because the work has to be in public domain in both US and in source country (see COM:L), and it's already known that it is not in public domain in Estonia. 90.191.76.154 15:49, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- You wrote that "this database entry doesn't really provide clear indication on when the photo was taken". But this database is an authoritative source. You need to prove that the date you set is more reliable. Hunu (talk) 07:00, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- It is an authoritative source, but its given entry just doesn't say what you claim it does, at least not in an explicit way. See the other entry from the same source (referenced above) that is explicit about the time of event ("19.02.1918"). In fact, it was you who initially set "1918" at the date field of file description page here, probably following the source publication given at the source field.
- As for copyright status in source country (see above) neither depiction date nor publication date matter though. 90.191.76.154 08:27, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- You wrote that "this database entry doesn't really provide clear indication on when the photo was taken". But this database is an authoritative source. You need to prove that the date you set is more reliable. Hunu (talk) 07:00, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: for all we know, it was published in 1915. Ruthven (msg) 08:59, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
I'm unsure whether this crosses the threshold of originality in Portugal. Guanaco (talk) 08:19, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:27, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I'm unsure whether this crosses the threshold of originality in Portugal. Guanaco (talk) 08:19, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:46, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:58, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Question Does this qualify to be {{PD-shape}} ?
- I don't think this is below TOO. Jcb (talk) 15:10, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
I have procedurally rollback the closure by Sreejithk2000. One cannot keep-close their own uploads. Jcb (talk) 15:32, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - I apologize for closing the DR. I thought why should this be open when the concern is already addressed. Here is the source btw - https://web.archive.org/web/20110329004303/https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/silicacrystalline/dust/chapter_4.html --Sreejith K (talk) 16:10, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
- That seems to be a credible claim that the work is published by the US government. The beginning of that document (of which this file cites chapter 4) says:
- "This report was prepared by Martin Marietta Laboratories, Baltimore, Maryland, and Marcom Associates, Inc., Annandale, Virginia, under USBM Contract Number J0235005. It was administered under the technical direction of the U.S. Bureau of Mines, Pittsburgh Research Center, with Vinit Mody acting as Technical Project Officer. Jon Volkwein was the contract administrator for the Bureau of Mines."
- so there is the authorship info. So it's not actually a work of the en:United States Bureau of Mines itself but by a third party under contract and direction by them (not a grant for their own independent work or a work purchased and reprinted). Does that make it a work-for-hire? DMacks (talk) 16:18, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
- That seems to be a credible claim that the work is published by the US government. The beginning of that document (of which this file cites chapter 4) says:
- Comment There appear to be 10 files that are all taken from this publication (search for "Collecting and disposing of dust"), so if this image is deleted for licensing reasons, those others should be also. DMacks (talk) 16:18, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per DMack's comment. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:46, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
It's not permitted to use files under this licence for certain purposes such as advertising, so this is an unfree licence. See also w:Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 September 27#Template:Copyrighted DC HK. Stefan2 (talk) 23:55, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:47, 16 November 2017 (UTC)