Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/12/04

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 4th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Last remaining image among copyvios, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 00:36, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: http://vntinnhanh.vn/giai-tri/me-man-nhan-sac-venezuela-gianh-giai-ve-dep-vuot-thoi-gian-2015-93847. --Yann (talk) 00:40, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Omar essam 53 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

wallpaper https://fr.pinterest.com/pin/399905641884321177/

Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:45, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:45, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the firestorm cloud not the "atomic cloud" and the Enola Gay had all but landed 3hrs after bombing the city, the picture is correctly described in one of my uploads and has a 2016 NYtimes article to corroborate it, unlike this nonsense Boundarylayer (talk) 00:17, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, it does not matter, how bad, erroneous and misleading the file is. It is used in multiple projects and cannot be deleted on any other reason than copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:05, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I'm not using it Crabx123 (talk) 01:41, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 20:47, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm no use to having a image/file, please delete it for me Crabx123 (talk) 02:28, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. Ruthven (msg) 09:49, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because I'm not to having a file, please delete it Crabx123 (talk) 04:08, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. Ruthven (msg) 12:43, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Despite the prior closes as kept, this appears to be a toy car, which would be covered by COM:TOYS. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:24, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: it's just a model of a (utilitarian) Volkswagen, no creativity has been added that would not fall under DM. --Jcb (talk) 12:10, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stolen from Flickr image here. (Photo is copyrighted by Jose A Blanco but was taken by Daniel Acosta, according to Flickr description... in any case, doesn't appear that the uploader took this photo.) — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 02:52, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:50, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is likely still under copyright since it is still being licensed by Getty Images at the following address: http://www.gettyimages.com/license/515120568 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.201.197.82 (talk • contribs) 2016-11-30T14:02:34‎ (UTC)

 Speedy delete, {{copyvio}}. Even the metadata explicitly states: "© Corbis. All Rights Reserved." The uploader has failed to identify whichever unidentified reason listed in {{PD-Iran}} is supposed to apply, but there is nothing at the source that would suggest that the first publication of this photo actually took place in Iran, which would have to be the case for the template to be relevant. LX (talk, contribs) 09:54, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, per LX. Taivo (talk) 10:01, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

for likt annet foto Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:25, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

jhfjhflffjlhg Roshan Shrestha (talk) 09:47, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:56, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower-quality duplicate of File:كيف يمكن ان يكون الحوار مفيدا ؟.jpg Imedeiros (talk) 00:34, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, scaled-down File:كيف يمكن ان يكون الحوار مفيدا ؟.jpg. Taivo (talk) 11:36, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque la fotografía ya había sido subida y no me había percatado Chamarasca (talk) 10:03, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:26, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-resolution personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. Also: previously published without a free license at https://twitter.com/roshkafan. LX (talk, contribs) 13:30, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hedwig in Washington: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Qarabag F.K.jpg: Unused low-resolution personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. Also: previo...

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: low-quality selfie not in use Imedeiros (talk) 17:57, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:30, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope. very blurry. Imedeiros (talk) 23:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:30, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo is original enough, above COM:TOO. XXN, 16:17, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Magog the Ogre: Copyright violation: professional logo

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: promotional image Imedeiros (talk) 00:08, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, so promotional image can be speedily deleted. Taivo (talk) 19:30, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality duplication of file:Canal UNO Logo 2013.jpg Imedeiros (talk) 00:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:34, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:18, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 19:35, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:20, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 19:36, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyvio; looks like still image from film or TV show Imedeiros (talk) 00:21, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 19:37, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of file:РЖД-Лого.jpg Imedeiros (talk) 00:25, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, only 34×19 pixels. Taivo (talk) 19:41, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT lNeverCry 00:25, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, big phone number means advert. Taivo (talk) 19:51, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: image of nothing, not used anywhere Imedeiros (talk) 00:26, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, description was intriguing, but file was disappointment. Taivo (talk) 20:00, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: family photo album type image of non-notable person Imedeiros (talk) 01:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 20:09, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Untraceable, location unknown, impossible to categorize. Jos1950 (talk) 01:05, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 20:17, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nothing special to find from this person, out of scope. Jos1950 (talk) 01:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Cabral montana (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in es.wiki and uploading selfie, which is used nowhere, except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 20:22, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personality rights (joke?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Macassar (talk • contribs) 2016-11-28T13:29:10‎ (UTC)


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 21:34, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: low-quality image of unknown person Imedeiros (talk) 03:18, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 21:39, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be uploader's own work: copyright likely belongs to author Clair Brown or Bloomsbury Press Animalparty (talk) 04:36, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Uniform looks like "Star Trek: Deep Space Nine"(?) i could not confirm if is it is an actor. Jahobr (talk) 05:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 21:55, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder (which is unlikely). The image is possibly under a free license or PD, but I can't find where. Ks0stm (TCGE) 07:54, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, we have much bigger photos about Hillary. I'll delete also file:Hillary Clinton.jpg.jpg due to same reason. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 22:01, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:12, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 22:14, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a logo of ES Power and is protected as a copyright. This file must be deleted. Dipika.esa (talk) 08:49, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 22:15, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yousufgreen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of scope.

Gauss (talk) 10:42, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photos without metadata. Taivo (talk) 13:55, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paras-d (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:37, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Hedwig in Washington: Why are screenshots of the MediaWiki software out of scope (and which "scope")? --AKlapper (WMF) (talk) 13:35, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That should be text, not graphics; just a code snippet. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 13:38, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A screenshot showing a MediaWiki extension in action is well within Commons scope (as evidenced by all the other images in Category:Screenshots_of_MediaWiki_extensions). Maybe you missed the search form shown on the bottom of the image? --Tgr (WMF) (talk) 11:22, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I did miss that.  I withdraw my nomination --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:24, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, the nomination is withdrawn. Taivo (talk) 16:16, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per the text and categories, this is supposed to be an insult. Takeaway (talk) 12:02, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I confirm insult. Taivo (talk) 16:33, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Either a joke or an insult. Takeaway (talk) 12:03, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, insult. Taivo (talk) 16:37, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created "artwork". Takeaway (talk) 12:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, insult. Taivo (talk) 16:38, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower resolution version of File:President Barack Obama awards Staff Sgt. Salvatore Giunta the Medal of Honor.jpg Tabercil (talk) 20:50, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, deleted by Matanya. --Tabercil (talk) 23:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete אסתי אדמיר (talk) 12:53, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, I do not want to delete. Uploader's request is valid reason only during first week after uploading. Here 4 years have passed. The photo has educational value, proper license and EXIF data. Taivo (talk) 10:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Etcetx (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unencyclopedic images. Out of scope.

XXN, 13:02, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:57, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. This poster contains original copyrighted material, IMO. XXN, 13:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, posters are out of Commons scope and the logo is complex anyway. I'll delete also file:Trofeul DanceMasters 2013.jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 11:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. XXN, 13:10, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Kenzo uploaded tournament table, where he was winner himself. No description, I do not understand even, was it competition of real sport or computer game, and Kenzo is a non-notable person anyway. Taivo (talk) 11:58, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims own work and "HojatRahimi" as the author, the giant watermark in the bottom right credits "Vahdat Rahimi." Would need an internet source or OTRS verification with the CC-BY-SA-4.0 release AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:53, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope anyway. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:31, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Vathsalaranathunga

[edit]

Vathsalaranathunga (talk · contribs) uploaded these images:

I suspect copyright violation. Uploader is often not author. A lot of small photos without metadata. Camera data shows 6 different models from 4 manufacturers. Taivo (talk) 09:20, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:18, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Punëtoria (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not covered by {{PD-Kosovo-exempt}}

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 13:47, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:23, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hoshi17 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No metadata; unlikely own work; they look like screenshots.

MCMLXXXIX 01:23, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, all out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 20:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: agree out of scope... looks like pages from a personal scrapbook. Acabashi (talk) 03:04, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:52, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:28, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:53, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:29, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:53, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Minhazuddinbd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Commons:Derivative works from software screenshots.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:53, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ricky Demi Informasi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:54, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:54, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Way out of scope. Imedeiros (talk) 15:49, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:54, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:54, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:54, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 4 December 2016 (UTC) The author of this research authorizes it's use on Wikimedia Commons. The study is nearly 14 years old and does not infringe on any copyright laws because it's purpose if for public access and educational information.[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:54, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. In use as fair use on English Wikipedia. Imedeiros (talk) 16:00, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:57, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The poster is relevant in the context of sonnets and crowns of sonnets. It shows how a crown of crowns of sonnets works. It's hard to explain how it works, while it consists of 211 sonnets which are linked together. The poster is a visualisation. It's the first crown of crowns of sonnets in the history. Best regards, Basjon.


Deleted: no evidence of permission. --Jcb (talk) 17:00, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, re-upload of content deleted by community consensus. Taivo (talk) 08:49, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (family album-style), not in use Imedeiros (talk) 16:06, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:00, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:00, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, not in use on any wikimedia project Imedeiros (talk) 16:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:00, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: selfie Imedeiros (talk) 18:41, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:06, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and watermarked across center of image Imedeiros (talk) 18:44, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:05, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mihail20105 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of scope.

Gauss (talk) 20:03, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:04, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of scope.

Gauss (talk) 20:08, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:04, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juanpx16 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 22:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:01, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, was used for vandalism on fr.wp, user blocked indefenitely. Do not follow (talk) 22:35, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:01, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pestacezet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images without plausbile categories, out of scope.

Gauss (talk) 22:50, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:01, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope:low quality, not in use Imedeiros (talk) 23:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:02, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio (movie poster) Imedeiros (talk) 23:50, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:02, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope; Imedeiros (talk) 23:52, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:02, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently copyviol, screenshot from https://tv.nrk.no/serie/skam/MYNT15000316/sesong-2/episode-3 XanonymusX (talk) 19:35, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:45, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rui Zuzza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of scope.

Gauss (talk) 19:49, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:44, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free material. XXN, 19:53, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination with example use larger & older at https://yt3.ggpht.com/-FjvVAj0smgM/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/llXOyuuGlDk/s900-c-k-no-mo-rj-c0xffffff/photo.jpg. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:44, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was previously published at http://www.lenegammelgaard.com/. An OTRS ticket is required. Diannaa (talk) 20:48, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:42, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test upload? not used, no description, no data source. Atlasowa (talk) 20:53, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test upload? not used, no description, no data source. Atlasowa (talk) 20:53, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test upload? not used, no description, no data source. Atlasowa (talk) 20:54, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test upload? not used, no description, no data source. Atlasowa (talk) 20:54, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test upload? not used, no description, no data source. Atlasowa (talk) 20:54, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Escudo del Senado de España.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:48, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. --JuTa 13:06, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is just the logo of some guy's fantasy soccer team. Apocheir (talk) 22:05, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

After I posted this request, I found some more logos for the user's fantasy soccer team. These should probably go too:

-Apocheir (talk) 22:12, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:37, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image of computer parts in a wide white frame, without discernible educational purpose. Gauss (talk) 22:47, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's blurry. there is a clear version in commons: Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 23:01, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete As the uploader and per Arnaud Palastowicz rationale. Tm (talk) 00:50, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:32, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, not in use Imedeiros (talk) 23:20, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:31, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, not in use Imedeiros (talk) 23:22, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, not in use Imedeiros (talk) 23:25, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF data says "This Image is the property of MingleMediaTV. If found please return to jd@minglemediatv.com, use without permission is forbidden according to your local lawmakers rules on using someone else's stuff without asking", which matches another Flickr user's images (https://www.flickr.com/photos/minglemediatv/27720473732/). Looks like Flickr washing to me Elisfkc (talk) 23:26, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains copy righted objects. Affected:

@Mhhossein: Could you please elaborate on what you mean by "copyrighted objects"? --Ilya (talk) 16:31, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The paintings on the wall. Are they in PD? --Mhhossein talk 16:33, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
they are CC BY SA. Each photo has a label underneath it that describes the author and the license --Ilya (talk) 16:40, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So we need permission from the authors of those depicted paintings. See com:derivative please. You can keep your photos by asking the authors of those paintings to send their permission letter to OTRS, otherwise they'll be deleted to avoid the violation of their rights. --Mhhossein talk 16:47, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
First, authors already gave the permission as it is required step of publishing the photographs under CC-BY-SA. Second, what part of Commons:De_minimis should apply here from your point of view? --Ilya (talk) 16:58, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good, then please provide those "permission"s. That they let you take photos does not mean they aimed to publish their paintings under a free license. I think we can't apply De minimis here. --Mhhossein talk 17:02, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
1) Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2016 in Ukraine/Winners 2) Maybe you are right, if De minimis cannot be applied please also ask to delete Category:Wiki Loves Earth 2016 in Tunisia Awards Ceremony, Category:Wiki Loves Earth 2016 in Bulgaria - Prize Awarding Ceremony, Category:Wiki Loves Art & Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Belgium & Luxembourg: awards ceremony, Category:Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Tunisia Awards Ceremony, Category:Winners Ceremony Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Germany, Category:WLE Serbia 2016 --Ilya (talk) 17:22, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
1) Those files depecting files uploaded here can be kept. 2) We can apply de minimis for Some of the files you mentioned. For example, see this and this and etc please. --Mhhossein talk 17:40, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ilya: Are all the pictures on the background already uploaded under CC? --Mhhossein talk 17:45, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
yes, they are --Ilya (talk) 17:47, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Mhhossein: , the pictures there are from the WLX 2016 in Ukraine Exhibition --アンタナナ 20:03, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It would be mad to delete images from a Wiki Loves Earth awards ceremony because of copyright infringement. Do not be disrupting just in order to make a point. --Lord Bumbury (talk) 17:52, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Лорд Бъмбъри: well, not everybody in the world knows that the exhibition is from our own winners :) --アンタナナ 20:03, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
アンタナナ:So much thank for you good faith comment. I was not aware about that or I would not start this request.--Mhhossein talk 04:50, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep There are at least three good reasons, each one would be enough for keeping them:
    1. Images are from WLE / WLM and are available under a free license, and appropriate attribution is provided on the photos themselves
    2. Even if these images were not under a free license, these images illustrate a current event (an award ceremony) and thus their use is allowed in this context per Ukrainian copyright law (notably there was a court case allowing use of photos of a photo exhibition to illustrate opening of this exhibition)
    3. Even if these images were not under a free license and WLX awards ceremony were not a current event, they fall under COM:DM anyway as in no way one can say that these images were the main goal of these photos — NickK (talk) 20:12, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
NickK: They clearly don't fall under de minimis. --Mhhossein talk 04:50, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion and withdrawn by nominator. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found almost everywhere! Mhhossein talk 16:34, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio? not in use Imedeiros (talk) 16:38, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: DW angry birds. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:56, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio in use on english wikipedia Imedeiros (talk) 16:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:56, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, in use on Russian wikipedia Imedeiros (talk) 17:08, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:56, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio in use on English wikipedia Imedeiros (talk) 17:09, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:55, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: low-qulity image of unknown person, not in use Imedeiros (talk) 17:21, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:55, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, not in use Imedeiros (talk) 17:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:54, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Credit: AMNH/S. Goldberg, M. Novacek. FunkMonk (talk) 18:01, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:54, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio (still image from recent film/TV), not in use Imedeiros (talk) 18:33, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:52, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio: movie poster Imedeiros (talk) 18:38, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:52, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Godfather is still under copyright. Ionutzmovie (talk) 02:15, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from google for sure. Ionutzmovie (talk) 02:23, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, yup "Batman". --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not present at the linked website under Source, which, in the first place, does not appear to license its photos under CC-BY-SA. Google Images reveals this image was stolen from a 14 March 2015 (same date that the uploader put) news article. — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 02:48, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this image is watermarked as copyrighted by Dyanna Taylor. Animalparty (talk) 04:30, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Unglovedlove (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work; images have been taken from http://csegrecorder.com/articles/view/highlights-of-petroleum-and-crustal-framework-of-the-us-chukchi-shelf

MKFI (talk) 09:37, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a copyright violation. The image has a copyright label in its bottom right corner! Exemplo347 (talk) 10:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I suppose this is the source: http://www.panoramio.com/photo/57374361
Copyrighted panoramio picture. --XXN, 12:00, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thumbnail resolution; unusable, un-necessary picture. XXN, 13:44, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is copyright image taken from the film's website without the publisher's permission Dan arndt (talk) 13:58, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF says: "Copyright holder LiviuSauca@UneekStudio" XXN, 14:15, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:05, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot, derivative work. XXN, 14:22, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:05, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of copyrighted television program. Mindmatrix 15:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:02, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Garkinive (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:24, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination with the additional observation that all but one image had extemely subtle pixel displacement logos showing true source. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:02, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, non-free original content. XXN, 00:01, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:24, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Discasto talk 00:09, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:24, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: low-quality image of non-notable person sleeping Imedeiros (talk) 00:16, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:24, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:22, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete OTRS-permission from author Graeme Ross is needed. Taivo (talk) 19:39, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:24, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: image of unknown person not used on any wikimedia project Imedeiros (talk) 03:23, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:24, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 06:41, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:24, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vellingirimeee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

--ghouston (talk) 06:43, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:24, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Stalyn Ortiz

[edit]

Stalyn Ortiz (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except two userpages (both in es.wiki) and uploading personal files, which are used nowhere, except on the userpages. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Rivaldo Bangula

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Rivaldo Bangula (talk · contribs):

Unused personal photos, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agree: the project does not support uploaders' self-centred scrapbooks and photo albums. Acabashi (talk) 11:17, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:26, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Renabanks

[edit]

Here are all uploads of Renabanks (talk · contribs):

They are all called selfies, but they do not look like that. Probably real photographer's copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 10:10, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:26, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 10:15, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:26, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Bajpaiabhinav

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Bajpaiabhinav (talk · contribs):

Small unused personal photos without metadata. They are claimed to be selfies, but they do not look like that. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 10:13, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:27, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear origin. This looks like it was either photographed off some sign or from a pamphlet with panoramic photos. The former case would be covered by freedom of panorama in Brazil, but if it was photographed off printed material it is a copyright infringement. De728631 (talk) 00:23, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:23, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation: [1], [2], second image is bigger than showed, open it in a new tab. APIA (talk) 00:40, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author changes her mind. Guise (talk) 00:56, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:31, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is a copyrighted bookcover, and meets the copyright violation. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 02:09, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Uploaded by the user to illustate his autobiography on eswiki. I nominate File:Elkin.png for deletion too. LlamaAl (talk) 02:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map is disused and obsolete because no longer updated. The SVG version is updated on a regular basis. Louperivois Ψ @ 02:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad license Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:34, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. If this is really 1923 film, then it is in public domain. I changed license accordingly. Taivo (talk) 21:16, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This is the 1912 Thanhouser film, but this file is a duplicate of File:Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1912).webm, which is in higher resolution and better categorized. This file could be kept if it's regarded as having sufficient quality. — WFinch (talk) 03:08, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as duplicate. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:20, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo with non-geometric features. — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 02:53, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:29, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo with non-geometric features. — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 02:54, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:29, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pub (contribution unique sur commons et wikipedia) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Macassar (talk • contribs) 2016-11-30T13:09:57‎ (UTC)


Deleted: self promotion, only used on a user page of a user without any contributions. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:27, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test page of ku:Bikarhêner:Calak in Kurdish wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghybu (talk • contribs) 2016-12-01T22:55:12‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:27, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This video illustrates the retraction of the foreskin but in the video the foreskin is not being fully retracted. I have just discovered this as I was unaware of how far my foreskin retracts. I have pulled it further back than in the video. I retracted way more than it did in the video. Thus I would like for it to be deleted as it does not meet the criteria of a full foreskin retraction. Please delete as it is also a video of my genitalia and it is private and I would not want the world seeing it. Brown boy (talk) 05:08, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request on upload day. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:29, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE: logo of minor company, uploaded a year ago with unclear permission provenance and not in use on any wiki project Closeapple (talk) 05:26, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:29, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jahangir.bd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal images : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:22, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:30, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sachindevyadav (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal images : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:23, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:30, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from Panoramio with a watermark that is not from the owner of the Panoramio account. Probable license laundering. Reventtalk 08:12, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:31, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from Panoramio with a watermark that is not from the owner of the Panoramio account. Probable license laundering. Reventtalk 08:13, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:31, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from Panoramio with a watermark that is not from the owner of the Panoramio account. Probable license laundering. Reventtalk 08:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:31, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from Panoramio with a watermark that is not from the owner of the Panoramio account. Probable license laundering. Reventtalk 08:16, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:32, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from Panoramio with a watermark that is not from the owner of the Panoramio account. Probable license laundering. Reventtalk 08:18, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:32, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from Panoramio with a watermark that is not from the owner of the Panoramio account. Probable license laundering. Reventtalk 08:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:32, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from Panoramio with a watermark that is not from the owner of the Panoramio account. Probable license laundering. Reventtalk 08:20, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:32, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Band Cana isn't mentioned neither in en:Cana nor in es:Cana. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:39, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:35, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in France. This memorial is erected after WWII and it is protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 08:58, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:36, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ghana. Wikicology (talk) 09:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:38, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ghana. Wikicology (talk) 09:08, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:38, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Seems to copied from internet. Sources: here Coderzombie (talk) 09:33, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:39, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright violation: studio portrait. MKFI (talk) 09:35, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:40, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Coolguybi

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Coolguybi (talk · contribs):

Self-claimed supermodel Rashid Ahsan isn't mentioned in en.wiki. Photos about him are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:32, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:40, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of SWNA

[edit]

Here are both contributions of SWNA (talk · contribs):

Small unused personal photos without metadata. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 09:36, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:41, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 09:42, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:42, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Jbedmar

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Jbedmar (talk · contribs):

Mostly small unused photos without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:40, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:43, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of JourneyToNeverland

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of JourneyToNeverland (talk · contribs):

Different cameras, different countries of origin. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:44, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:43, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Robertcoroianu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

One non-free logo of a company, and one diploma. Both unused, probably COM:ADVERT. Also out of scope.

XXN, 10:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:44, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Guptaaditya

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Guptaaditya224 (talk · contribs):

Small unused personal photos without metadata, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:44, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Mussuela

[edit]

Here are both contributions of Mussuela (talk · contribs):

Uploader is depicted person and the photos do not look like selfies. OTRS-permission from photographer (not from Izilda Mussuela) is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:24, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:44, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Easternworld Music (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:45, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Easternworld Music (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All are official promo photos circulating on the web. No evidence that the uploader is actually the copyright owner as claimed. User has already been warned and blocked in the past for repeatedly uploading copyright images.

DAJF (talk) 08:43, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:01, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://cimolais.it/wp-content/uploads/cropped-cornetto1.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:44, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyvio. Used as fair use on english wikipedia Imedeiros (talk) 15:59, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:44, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo. Copied from enwiki where is used as fair use. XXN, 16:15, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:44, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Mhhossein talk 16:37, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:43, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Oude-rusman (talk) 16:41, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:43, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zinyaw Kun (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio. Differing EXIF data. User has uploaded obvious copyvios using socks. Some photos are also clearly out of scope.

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:09, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, "My beautiful white dog 1–3" depicts 3 different white dogs. Taivo (talk) 14:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:42, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image feels more like a Facebook photo than something realistically useful for educational purposes ViperSnake151 (talk) 17:39, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:41, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by LX as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=3006416256477
Upload mid 2013; Maybe a copy from commons to facebook? Should be regular DR. Wdwd (talk) 17:55, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:41, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 18:24, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:41, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. penis picture Imedeiros (talk) 23:02, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:40, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was published here three years before being uploaded to Wiki Commons. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:02, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:39, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Imedeiros (talk) 23:03, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:39, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not too simple for copyright in most countries. See COM:TOO Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:18, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:39, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sports logo, see COM:COA. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:31, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:39, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: not useful Imedeiros (talk) 23:36, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:38, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: low-quality, "family album"-style image Imedeiros (talk) 23:42, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:38, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie, the user's last remaining upload. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:35, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

 Delete Agreed. Policy allows one or two personal images for user pages of active contributors, but "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook..     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:34, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:46, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information about where this photo was first published, as required for the chosen PD rationale. As for the "when", the uploader claims that was the day before the upload, which would contradict the PD claim (but then the uploader also claims this is a selfie). LX (talk, contribs) 10:42, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:47, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickrwash, clearly a professional photograph without OTRS, the account of Flickr contains a large amount of copyvio files. Karst (talk) 10:44, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:49, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Charles Mallison

[edit]

Uploader had tried to tag for deletion some own uploads, prepending "Suppression rapide de ce fichier à la demande du sujet. Charles Mallison".

@Charles Mallison: please justify below why you are requesting deletion of these images. --XXN, 10:45, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The french text translates as Speedy deletion at the request of the subject of the image (i.e., requested by the depicted person who is likely not the uploader). -- Gauss (talk) 13:02, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep He sent in a note at OTRS ticket:2016120310008201 as well. I don't see a valid reason to delete. Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:42, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't really care but, from the course of action and the formulation, it seems to me that the subject, Mrs Lemaire, has not given her consent prior to the upload, and explicitly refused her consent after the upload (expressed towards the uploader). This sounds like a valid reason for deletion to me. -- Gauss (talk) 18:21, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

En effet, je confirme. CM.

Non, je confirme le souhait du sujet de voir ce fichier supprimer séance tenante. C'est la moindre des choses que de respecter cette volonté ; personne ne peut s'octroyer le droit de disposer d'une image qui a été mise par erreur (ce que CM me confirme). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charles Mallison (talk • contribs)

So, @Ronhjones: , does the ticket comes from the subject of the photo or the photographer? In the former case, we could keep it, otherwise, we must delete it. --Ruthven (msg) 23:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The e-mail address is consistent with the uploader. Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:03, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Images are unused and they does not seem to be taken in a public space. Ankry (talk) 07:54, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as a courtesy. Images are unused, subject does not seem to be a public figure. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:52, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Zagarts

[edit]

Here are all uploads of Zagarts (talk · contribs):

Own work is not obvious. OTRS-permission from Gabriela Zapata is needed. In addition, Landsemk is not mentioned in en.wiki and twice mentioned in es.wiki, so maybe the photos are out of project scope too. Taivo (talk) 10:44, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyvios. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

files of ZZero4K

[edit]

ZZero4K (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Commons has a problem of very bad cat-photos. Taivo (talk) 10:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of 786sarwar

[edit]

Here are both uploads of 786sarwar (talk · contribs):

Unused selfies, in my opinion not suitable for stock photos. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:01, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not covered by PD-Spain. Certainly not CC. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:06, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:56, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Aicha68

[edit]

Here are both uploads of Aicha68 (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata, uploader is herself depicted and it is not a selfie. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user images, user only has contributions on user pages. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:59, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. A source and a reason why this image is in the public domain (or a CC BY-SA 4.0 is applicable) is needed Strakhov (talk) 11:41, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Usual "I don't know who the author is" equals to "Anonymous". --Discasto talk 12:34, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Source country is Spain, which needs 80 years from death. Depicted person was born in 1906, so this is unlikely. Taivo (talk) 16:25, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:59, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:58, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tommyzat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos. Out of scope.

XXN, 11:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:57, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused art of non-notable artist, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:54, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:57, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. 89.178.2.233 13:21, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. 89.178.2.233 13:21, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. 89.178.2.233 13:22, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. 89.178.2.233 13:23, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. 89.178.2.233 13:24, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. 89.178.2.233 13:25, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:53, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. 89.178.2.233 13:26, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:53, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (non-free text). 89.178.2.233 13:28, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:52, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. XXN, 13:29, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:52, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. 89.178.2.233 13:36, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:51, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official-looking photo of Rock-Antoine Mehanna, allegedly a self-portrait, doubtful as user has demonstrated lack of understanding of copyright on enwiki. BethNaught (talk) 13:40, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:51, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo. XXN, 13:49, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:51, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERT. XXN, 13:50, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:50, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unidentified person. Out of scope. XXN, 14:09, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:49, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked image from Panoramio not created by owner of the Panoramio account. Probable license laundering. (That account has other files with the same issue.) Mindmatrix 14:49, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:48, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo with non-geometric features — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 15:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:48, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No references. Piotr967 (talk) 15:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:48, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No references. Piotr967 (talk) 15:15, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:48, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, can be done with wikitable Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:25, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:46, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused map. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:45, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:45, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Yomar Sitven

[edit]

Here are both uploads of Yomar Sitven (talk · contribs):

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:58, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:14, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Alhasanblogger

[edit]

Here are all uploads of Alhasanblogger (talk · contribs):

Small unused personal photos without metadata, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:08, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:00, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Ayyappancs

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Ayyappancs (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:00, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Adysetia1

[edit]

Adysetia1 (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

First group. Mostly small photos and mostly without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation.

Second group. Unused logos with unclear notability, maybe out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:21, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:00, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Adysetia1

[edit]

Adysetia1 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

First group. Complex logos need OTRS-permission from organization representative.

Second group. Camera data is always missing. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:49, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:43, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alantope (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Com:Packaging

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:17, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:14, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Miracle Adikah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unsourced collages.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:20, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:14, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cristian Brumar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional uploads.

XXN, 13:03, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. The files are in scope, because they can be used in ro:Tehno Art Solution. Unfortunately the logo surpasses threshold of orihinality and needs OTRS-permission from company representative. Taivo (talk) 11:46, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:15, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Березовий (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There is a difficulty here. Василь Миколайович Березовий (3 березня 1938 - 28 лютого 2015) passed away in 2015, but here we have a gallery of uploads labeled "own work" from 2016. I find this highly unlikely.

Hello. Indeed, Василь Миколайович Березовий has gone in 2015. And I'm his grandson Березовий Влас Романович. My father (Березовий Роман Васильович) and I now are the heirs of thуese arts. That's why I mentioned this files as "my own".

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: please send permission to OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 20:54, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Березовий (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Василь Миколайович Березовий (3 березня 1938 - 28 лютого 2015) passed away in 2015, but here we have a gallery of uploads labeled "own work" from 2016.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:26, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 3 December 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograph shows nonsensical object. Therefore, it cannot use to educational purpose. 掬茶 (talk) 00:25, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I would not say "nonsensical". It appears to be a bridge pier. However, I agree that it is not useful. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:29, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The link provided in the Source field doesn't appear to license the images under CC-BY-SA — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 02:54, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, could this could be kept under Template:PD-Venezuela? — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 19:25, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment 1942 is year of creation. But PD-Venezuela needs publication data. Taivo (talk) 21:27, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: A close call. It is a scan of a half tone, so it certainly has been published. The question is whether than publication was before 1956. COM:PRP says we cannot keep it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:33, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Link provided in Source field doesn't appear to license its photos under CC-BY-SA — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 02:55, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, could this be kept as it only displays text? — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 04:27, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, the text is enough long for literary copyright. Taivo (talk) 21:30, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Link provided in Source field doesn't appear to license its photos under CC-BY-SA — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 02:56, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, could this be kept under Template:PD-Venezuela? — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 19:25, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, the text seems to be enough long for literary copyright. PD-Venezuela needs text author and his/her year of death. Taivo (talk) 21:33, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

although transferred from EN-WP, 2008 thumbnail-format file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - other opinions, please? Roland zh (talk) 03:48, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Author doesn't match uploader. Although this is not tiny, we have many similar photos that are larger. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:35, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The letter "F" is drawn in three dimensions. Looks copyrightable in the UK and the US. I don't know why it was uploaded to Commons. Uploader can explain this. George Ho (talk) 04:43, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. As the F consists only of 3 cuboids, it is still simple in my opinion. Taivo (talk) 21:46, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The Edge logo is copyrightable in the UK, Taivo. In other words, the UK courts set the originality standards very low to the level of mere anything that is original enough. The 3D "F" is copyrightable there, so it does not belong in Commons. --George Ho (talk) 22:09, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Read more at COM:TOO#United Kingdom. --George Ho (talk) 22:10, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
EDGE logo is really more complex than this F. Taivo (talk) 22:11, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Wait, Taivo... the copyright might belong to an American record label, Atlantic Records. The album has a copyright notice on the back cover... Wait, so does the UK single and the US one. If the 3D "F" is not enough to you, what the typeface of "Foreigner"? It looks copyrightable, right? --George Ho (talk) 22:19, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The nom is half right. Type faces, including the 3D "F" cannot have a copyright in the USA. But, typography has a special 25 year copyright in the UK, so this 1984 work was certainly copyrighted there until 2009. It also probably is above the ToO in the UK, so it will be under copyright until at least 1/1/2055 and probably much longer. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:38, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ghana. Wikicology (talk) 09:08, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:41, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo has 3D effects and texture that clearly go beyond {{PD-textlogo}}. LX (talk, contribs) 10:36, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This is published by Electronic Arts, a USA company. There is no copyirhgt for any typeface in the USA, no matter how complex. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Krassiyank

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Krassiyank (talk · contribs):

Alessandro Durando isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in it.wiki. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:39, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ramaksoud2000 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Unclear if linked Flickr account can release the rights, since they did not do the portrait. Also, even if they did, there is no rights release from the Reddit user that colorized the portrait. This is an unfree. A regular DR is better. Yann (talk) 11:15, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Original BW photo published in 1944 without a copyright notice, therefore in the Public domain. Also, colorization of a BW photo is not a creative work at least for this case. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:33, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Amitie 10g: Where was it published? And why wouldn't colorization meet the low bar for a creative work? Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 18:49, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have no proof, but is very unlikely that an "Official campaign portarit" was never been published. And about the Threshold of originality, the colorization didn't created a new, defferent photo; this is just a kind of "Reproduction of 2D work already in the Public domain". As there are some controversies about the colorization of photos (not Motion Pictures, that have separated copyright statements). --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:08, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per Amitie. Surely official portraits are published. And such kind of colorization is not enough creative work. Taivo (talk) 16:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I'm (very) surprised at the opinions expressed that the colorization would not be copyrightable. While I understand that the huge amount of work required for these is not in itself an argument for "copyrightability" in the US per the rejection of the sweat of the brow doctrine, I do think that a huge number of creative choices are needed when performing a colorization like this. Compare e.g. File:Sholesdaughter_colorized.jpg. And are we even sure the colorization is a US work? Many jurisdictions do indeed recognize sweat of the brow. Storkk (talk) 16:54, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I concur. The applicable standard in the U.S. is a "minimal degree of creativity." See en:Feist_Publications,_Inc.,_v._Rural_Telephone_Service_Co.. I would think that one has to meet that very low bar in colorizing a work. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 18:44, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Although I don't know of any case law on colorized stills, the case law on motion pictures clearly gives a copyright to the colorized version. I don't see any reason why a still would be different. If an artist made an oil painting from the B&W, the painting would clearly have a copyright. It seems to me that painting on top of the B&W has the same result. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear status, no date, no source, no author Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:05, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Source appears to be history.org.ua. Photo must be ~1930. Contents of the web page are released under CC BY-SA 3.0. --Ruthven (msg) 23:03, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Question Why must this be 1930s? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:46, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Because he was born on 11 January 1903. --Oude-rusman (talk) 22:04, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I changed source and passed license review. Taivo (talk) 16:59, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruthven and Taivo: The source declares CC-BY-SA for texts only (Тексти доступні на умовах ліцензії…). Sealle (talk) 20:22, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete No evidence of PD - no indication when it has been first published. Sealle (talk) 20:22, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, of course you are right. No evidence, that the photo is published before 2003, and source license applies only for text, not for images. Taivo (talk) 20:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:52, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No date of death given for the painter to justify the UK life + 70 claim; quite possible that a painting from this period is still in copyright under UK law. The source website only releases the image on a non-commercial basis. Hchc2009 (talk) 13:17, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Painter unknown ("by British School"), thus we must deduce parameters for assessing copyright status, using reasonable assumptions. The subject of the portrait is William Wyndham (1868–1950). It can reasonably be assumed that the sitter is aged 50 (no noticeble wrinkles on face, etc) thus let us assume it was painted in 1918 (1868 + 50). Let us furthermore assume quite reasonably that the unknown painter was of a similar age, 50, and that he died before his 78th birthday in 1946. That gives a reasonable claim for the use of a "UK life + 70 claim" licence. There is not a likely risk of WP being challenged on this licence by a tiny provincial museum in England. This is not the litigious National Portrait Gallery in London.(Lobsterthermidor (talk) 18:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC))[reply]
UK copyright law would certainly cover a work that might have been painted anywhere between 1920-1940. Many such books and paintings are still in copyright. If you don't know the identity of a painter, however, you should use the UK-anonymous tag; for that to be legally applicable in the UK, you need to have done reasonable research into the identity of the painter - which UK copyright practice certainly includes consulting the museum that holds the work or the website that has published it. That the work has been put on a display by a small museum, rather than the National Portrait Gallery, isn't a reason to ignore the UK's copyright laws. Hchc2009 (talk) 18:30, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Rule of thumb says, that 50 years must be given for author to die. Your claim, that painter was 50 years old when creating the artwork has no ground. Taivo (talk) 12:05, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Far too recent to assume the painter has been dead for 70 years. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:58, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by San zav (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Крижані́вський Ві́ктор Володи́мирович (12 травня 1950, Заячівка, УРСР — 21 липня 2016, Київ, Україна). Used without the permission.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:26, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete If the informations are correct, these files cannot remain on Commons whithout the authorisation of the heirs of Victor Krijanvsky. Kathisma (talk) 01:25, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:59, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No real source provided. CC-by-sa license and "own work" tag do not apply. I could not locate a reliable source on the web for this image, perhaps someone can do better? Ariadacapo (talk) 07:15, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I used Move-to-commons assistant in order to move it from en:wiki. Maybe you can't find it on the web because there isn't any and the one who uploaded the image at en:wp is actually the real author of the image? If he's not, maybe the image would be fit for {{PD-USGov}} if the source can be found.Ionutzmovie (talk) 07:17, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you can't provide the source from which this image was copied, then this discussion is rather pointless and Commons:Assume good faith#Good faith and copyright should be applied.Ionutzmovie (talk) 22:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The original uploader on Wikipedia was a sockpuppet account and claimed both to "have created this work all my [themselves]" and that the photo came from "US. White House" (in which case this photo should likely be public domain). Assuming good faith does not mean giving up common sense. Either we can find some evidence this picture is PD-USGOV or we should delete it. Ariadacapo (talk) 11:38, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The image is very like others at https://www.jfklibrary.org/Asset-Viewer/Archives/JFKWHP-1963-02-18-B.aspx. The image is reversed (Kennedy should be on the left). There's a properly oriented copy at http://kiss.caltech.edu/Tolman-Bacher/caltech_jpl.html, but they don't provide a source. Diannaa (talk) 00:50, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fantastic! I’ll upload the public-domain images from the JFK Library to Commons this week-end, so that we have a good-quality, properly-sourced alternative to the current image. Ariadacapo (talk) 11:24, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Diannaa for finding a better quality replacement for this image. All the deletion requests of this kind should end up this way.Ionutzmovie (talk) 13:58, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Von Kármán receives National Medal of Science (JFKWHP-AR7727-A)
Von Kármán receives National Medal of Science (JFKWHP-AR7727-D)
Von Kármán receives National Medal of Science (JFKWHP-KN-C26778)
Done, thanks again Diannaa for the pointer and Ionutzmovie for your patience. I think the current file can be deleted now. Ariadacapo (talk) 07:45, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 14:04, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I went searching for additional images of buboes, and found an additional instance of this image, with a copyright claim, claiming: "Copyright (c) 2006 Pearson Education Inc, publishing as Benjamin Cummings".

Personally, I am not a fan of deleting images solely as a precaution. Tineye found 234 instances of this image. The world is full of naive or unscrupulous people, who slap a copyright claim on all kinds of images, when that claim is not credible. But I did think the claim should be discussed. Here is the URL to the version with the copyright claim. [3] Geo Swan (talk) 12:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) is citing this as their own work, with a creation date of 1993 and releasing it as public domain(link is part of the image template). They do claim copyright in rare instance but not on this one. The image linked appears to be from a university instructor's page. They might have tagged it incorrectly, or as a precautionary measure they pulled from a publishers copy of this image. I don't see a credible enough copyright claim to think that the CDC is tagging this image as theirs and public domain incorrectly. -Optigan13 (talk) 16:23, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Thuresson (talk) 14:12, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Also out of scope. Jcb (talk) 13:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I think it is probably own work by this one time editor. Google does not find it, it is good sized, and it has EXIF. HOwever, without a description it isn't useful. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:02, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused persona photo. More:

Mhhossein talk 16:58, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:03, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr license specifies non-commercial use only : Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC 2.0) Rcbutcher (talk) 16:58, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Eureka Lott is probably correct, but our standard of proof is "beyiond a significant doubt", not "probably". We do get users who adopt Flickr usernames to upload images that are not correctly licensed for Commons. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:05, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is a COM:derivative of another work. Mhhossein talk 17:00, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's only the signature, not eligible for copyright.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 08:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Plain signatures do not have copyrights. However, artistic ones, such as this one, do. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:06, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of imho rather moderate quality, imho randomly taken from train/car/bus etc, showing little tiny monkeys which are not identificable, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:41, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry Ю. Данилевский (talk) 20:03, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown copyright situation, ACLU is definitely not the federal government. Jcb (talk) 20:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This is a court filing, which by its nature is a public document and does not have a copyright. The redaction was done by a Federal employee, so everything we see here was actually created by a Federal employee. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:11, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dated post-1923 - not PD SteveStrummer (talk) 21:03, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Anglo-Irish artist lived 1857-1947. The rule here is pma 70, so this will be PD on 1/1/2018. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per above. Green Giant (talk) 04:17, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dated post-1923 - not PD SteveStrummer (talk) 21:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Anglo-Irish artist lived 1857-1947. The rule here is pma 70, so this will be PD on 1/1/2018. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per 70PMA. Green Giant (talk) 03:53, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Landowski is dead in 1961. No FoP in France. 90.61.235.217 23:12, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, restore in 2032. --Havang(nl) (talk) 10:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Landowski is dead in 1961. No FoP in France. 90.61.235.217 23:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, restore in 2032. --Havang(nl) (talk) 10:51, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Louis Barillet is dead in 1948. No FoP in France. 90.61.235.217 23:17, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, restore in 2019. --Havang(nl) (talk) 10:52, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Frédéric DE LA VIUDA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Raoul Josset is dead in 1957. No FoP in France.

90.61.235.217 23:26, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, to be restored in 2028. --Havang(nl) (talk) 10:47, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marcel Gaumont is dead in 1962. No FoP in France. 90.61.235.217 23:28, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, restore in 2033. --Havang(nl) (talk) 10:52, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Raoul Josset is dead in 1957. No FoP in France. 90.61.235.217 23:31, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, restore in 2028. --Havang(nl) (talk) 10:53, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jean Gaudin is dead in 1954. No FoP in France. 90.61.235.217 23:36, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, restore in 2025. --Havang(nl) (talk) 10:54, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Henri Marret is dead in 1954. No FoP in France. 90.61.235.217 23:40, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, restore in 2025 --Havang(nl) (talk) 10:49, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1946. Jcb (talk) 14:38, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 14:36, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of Nataša Kramberger, Slovenia. Subject requests deletion on non-consent to publication ticket:2016120210043746, Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements shows consent is required for commercial use in Slovenia. Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:35, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, subject has a Wikipedia article. Added "personality rights" template. Thuresson (talk) 14:39, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Thuresson (talk) 14:39, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not explicitly dedicated to the public domain, as the uploader stated. See here (in the Foto's tab it says "bron: Stichting Oorlogs- en Verzetsmateriaal Groningen") and here ("De aangeboden informatie is copyright van het Nationaal Comité 4 en 5 mei tenzij uitdrukkelijk anders vermeld."). Wutsje 23:50, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: we have {{Anonymous-EU}} for this ('oorlogsmonumenten' is of course not the author) Jcb (talk) 16:49, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I no longer support my decision above of 5 years ago. No authorship information, no evidence at all that this would be an anonymous work. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 13:10, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per re-nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:29, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos; out of scope.
+
* File:Ruben la finalul clasei a VII-a (iunie 2015).jpg XXN, 13:56, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:30, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by II. Niveles as Speedy (Speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright. Maybe this is textlogo? Taivo (talk) 11:38, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Trademark or not, this does not matter. Only threshold of originality matters. Taivo (talk) 12:06, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Above TOO. --PierreSelim (talk) 23:36, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by II. Niveles as Speedy (Speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright. Should be compared with threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 11:41, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Above ToO. --PierreSelim (talk) 23:36, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by II. Niveles as Speedy (Speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright. The logo should be compared with threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 12:01, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Above ToO. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:33, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (photo of non-free content). 89.178.2.233 13:27, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: de minimis. Ruthven (msg) 17:52, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work, seems taken from some catalogue. Jcb (talk) 13:54, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:59, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient authorship information. When did Antonie Steimann die? No evidence that he died before 1946. Jcb (talk) 14:00, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:59, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source information, unknown copyright situation. No evidence that this DW only consists of free elements. Jcb (talk) 14:02, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No evidence that the author died before 1946. Jcb (talk) 14:15, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information. No evidence that PD-Italy would apply. Jcb (talk) 14:21, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:23, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PK-LMN (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope, no EDUSE.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 14:32, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:MelvL 2月2日 (6807067477).jpg as in scope of Danbo. File:MelvL (13950212253).jpg as in scope of Olympus cameras. Rest delete as per nom and as uploader request :) PK-LMN (talk) 14:41, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:03, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. NB: MelvL (13950212253).jpg is not a duplicate, hence it has been kept. Ruthven (msg) 17:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PK-LMN (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:TOY. These subjects are based on fictional robots from Gundam. --IDCM (talk) 14:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:41, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author changes his mind Guise (talk) 22:53, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: file uploaded in August, since then, no OTRS authorisation has been sent by the author. Eventually deleted. Ruthven (msg) 17:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication at all that this would be a work of the federal government. Jcb (talk) 13:22, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:03, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 13:25, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete By style this is old file. But without author data it is out of scope. Taivo (talk) 12:20, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:02, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication at all that this would be a work from the federal government. Jcb (talk) 13:28, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & found at Getty: http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/photo/empty-school-room-in-michigan-high-res-stock-photography/tlp717157. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:01, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication at all that this would be a work from the federal government. Jcb (talk) 13:29, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Getty images says 1947 here http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/young-students-studying-in-local-school-room-news-photo/50772917#young-students-studying-in-local-school-room-picture-id50772917. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:00, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maple leaf is probably over the threshold of originality. Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:29, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I agree, this not such kind of maple leaf you can see on flag of Canada. Taivo (talk) 21:54, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep More complicated than the Canadian flag, but, I think, not above the ToO. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:39, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: below TOO. P 1 9 9   20:33, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:50, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The category of file was changed to the NGO signs subcategory of Signs in Turkey category. So the deletion request regarding the logos should be cancelled. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zcebeci (talk • contribs)
 Comment NGO signs need also OTRS-permission from NGO. Taivo (talk) 15:47, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not simple, not used, promotional. P 1 9 9   20:35, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Murbaut as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.marinafm.com/ Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:28, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like PD-textlogo to me. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:28, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
oh, but I look at web it. Murbaut (talk) 14:42, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-text only. P 1 9 9   20:36, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Murbaut as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://kowssar.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/ Probably PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 14:34, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

link dead Murbaut (talk) 14:43, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused promotional logo. P 1 9 9   20:38, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Maury Povich.jpg ☾Loriendrew☽ (talk) 18:53, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:38, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of Rudowlosa1 A1AA1A (talk) 20:53, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected the other larger one. P 1 9 9   20:43, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has a vectorial version that is used in its place: File:Logo Impiva.svg. Nomaj (talk) 15:30, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We do not generally delete pre-existing PNGs. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has a vectorial version that is used in its place: File:Logo Impiva.svg. Nomaj (talk) 15:30, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:32, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has a vectorial version that is used in its place: File:Corts Valencianes.svg. Nomaj (talk) 17:31, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We do not generally delete pre-existing PNGs. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:33, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

same picture with better quality available: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mater_amoris_et_doloris_-_quam_Christus_in_cruce_moriens_omnibus_ac_singulis_suis_fidelibus_in_matrem_legavit,_ecce_mater_tua_-_nunc_explicata_per_sacra_emblemata,_figuras_scripturae_qu%C3%A0m_plurimas,_(14746608575).jpg Procopius Anthemius (talk) 18:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The images are different enough to keep. The one nominated has contrast details and more visual information than the larger one. Note the complete swirls at the bottom of the frame, the darker lettering and so on. I categorized it. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: A close call, but I think Ellin is right. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has a vectorial version that is used in its place: File:Biblioteca Valenciana.svg. Nomaj (talk) 18:10, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-textlogo}} {{PD-shape}} {{Trademarked}}

--Altorrijos (talk) 08:48, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Duplicate. --Yann (talk) 10:51, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The route diagram template should be used instead of this kind of files. Nomaj (talk) 19:21, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Out of scope. Very poor quality anyway. --Yann (talk) 10:52, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:TOO#United Kingdom Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:44, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 10:53, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not pd-textlogo Krd 09:01, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:26, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. May be old enough. More info needed. Yann (talk) 11:16, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Pre-1944 photo. Source is aomda.org. --Ruthven (msg) 22:59, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: photo from around the 1930s, considering the age of the subject, photographer unknown, but unlikely to be anonymous. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:57, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obsoleted redirect; should be location of File:BSicon MASKm.svg Jc86035 (talk) Use {{ping|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
12:09, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: differing opinion about whether or not this redirect needs to be kept, no reason to delete the redirect, especially since it's still in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:00, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Not PD-shape. Jcb (talk) 13:23, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Author of the work is Indian government. That means: the work is protected with copyright 60 years from publishing. Year of publishing (that means creation) is needed to determine restore date. Taivo (talk) 12:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unclear copyright situation. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Could be {{PD-US-no notice}}, can't find the printing company on the web. It's certainly isn't CC, that's for sure. Thoughts? Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:16, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I took this picture from an old post card from 1937 which I bought on ebay. The printing company of the postcard was "The Cincinnati News Compnay", which already has ceased existing. Hope this information helps.--Alantope (talk) 12:43, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any copyright notice on the back? Regards, Yann (talk) 10:49, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: following the example of File:Making charcoal at Jack Daniels, Jack Daniel Distillery, Lynchburg (pop. 361), Tennessee.jpg, I mark the postcard

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published in the United States between 1929 and 1977, inclusive, without a copyright notice. For further explanation, see Commons:Hirtle chart as well as a detailed definition of "publication" for public art.

العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  čeština  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  français  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  Nederlands  português  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  ไทย  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Flag of the United States
Flag of the United States
. Ruthven (msg) 12:35, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free at URAA date. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:45, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It was free in USA on URAA date, because anonymous Polish photographs were not protected at all at that time. Taivo (talk) 10:44, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure about being anon. Anyway, there's an OTRS ticket pending. ticket:2016120410007844, discussion probably not necessary. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 13:04, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OTRS permission. Ruthven (msg) 12:26, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]