Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/08/04

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 4th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work. Put before the community. @Matanya: your upload.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:24, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Matanya: Derivative of non-free content: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Paradise Now.JPG: This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work</t...

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want my work here غياث العرودكي (talk) 18:33, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 19:44, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want my work here غياث العرودكي (talk) 18:33, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 19:43, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want my work here. غياث العرودكي (talk) 18:33, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 19:42, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want my work here. غياث العرودكي (talk) 18:34, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 19:41, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, Melissa Golden, am the sole copyright holder of this image. I licensed it to RLJ Companies for usage through 2015. Their license has expired and I do not give permission as sole copyright holder for this image to be in the commons. Please contact me at melissa@melissagolden.com if further documentation is required. 2602:306:CE44:C20:51AC:13F4:E84:F642 19:45, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh that's just dandy. A permission statement was filed, including the language I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, ...
They also stated in writing, that they are the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the attached photo.
I noticed that the original statement was signed by the "The RLJ Companies" and questioned whether they had the authority to do that, as there was an indication that Melissa Golden was the copyright holder. The response was that the company contracted with Melissa Golden, and agreed that the photo credit should remain with Melissa Golden.
This is all a perfectly routine set of circumstances. We are now told that the contract was not perpetual, but time limited, which means the original permission statement was flawed, as they were only the temporary owner of the rights, and were not in a position to provide a perpetual agreement.--Sphilbrick (talk) 14:21, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and Lisandro Juvenal Cardozo Almada. Out of Commons:Project scope: Is this person notable? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: misused galleries. --INeverCry 02:55, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not licensed properly. T0lk (talk) 20:05, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Explained in more detail at File talk:House of Abbud.jpg - basically T0lk licensed it as Public Domain on another Wiki, then recently changed the license to CC-BY-SA. Other users are saying the original PD license is irrevocable. (Personally, since CC-BY-SA suffices for our purposes, I would be willing to let him; but I can see the principle in play here as well.) --GRuban (talk) 02:16, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Fyi, this discussion should apply to these images as well:

There was no reason to believe pd-self would be non-revocable in 2008. You can look up all the pages/documents from that time and none of them mention an indefinite term for licenses. Even if they did, these images were not uploaded by me. I believe I have a right to license them differently then pd-self, and chose Cc-by-3.0 which gives the same rights (commercial use, etc), with the addition of attribution. If Commons can accept cc-by-3.0 then deletion is not necessary. However, I won't allow pd-self going forward. Geagea raised the issue of people having used it without attribution in the past, those people would be able to access the file history and prove legitimate use. T0lk (talk) 02:51, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism. no valid reason for deletion, COM:LRV, see users talkpage. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:49, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked the user as well, it has been explained to him often enough that the license is irrevocable. He also agreed by using our site to the terms of use, pursuant to the Section 7 ToU (No revocation of license) the license grant is not revocable. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:52, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not licensed properly T0lk (talk) 20:13, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See also: Commons:Deletion_requests/File:House_of_Abbud.jpg


Kept: Vandalism. no valid reason for deletion, COM:LRV, see users talkpage. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:48, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not licensed properly T0lk (talk) 20:14, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See also: Commons:Deletion_requests/File:House_of_Abbud.jpg


Kept: Vandalism. no valid reason for deletion, COM:LRV, see users talkpage. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:48, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not licensed properly T0lk (talk) 20:14, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See also: Commons:Deletion_requests/File:House_of_Abbud.jpg


Kept: Vandalism. no valid reason for deletion, COM:LRV, see users talkpage. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:48, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sebastien maulme (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo about a not noable actor during a short movie (cf Youtube : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsL1Yx_81IsySnF-xrFhVTA ).

Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 16:48, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:04, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sebastien maulme (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo about a not noable actor during a short movie (cf Youtube : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsL1Yx_81IsySnF-xrFhVTA ).

Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 05:54, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, kept a few as per User:Czar. P 1 9 9   16:01, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. http://www.artlebedev.ru/metro/official-map/ Alex Florstein (talk) 09:51, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 04:28, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small logo with no exif data. Wikicology (talk) 16:37, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Josve05a: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DHCRF (talk · contribs)

[edit]

all images copied from the internet but uploaded as "own work". Probable copyright violations.

Takeaway (talk) 09:08, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by DHCRF (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright violations. Images taken from the internet but uploaded as "own work" and under a CC-BY-SA-4.0 license in violation of the copyright licenses from where they were taken.

Takeaway (talk) 15:23, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by DHCRF (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Continued copyright violations bu DHCRF

Takeaway (talk) 10:22, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty gallery 최광모 (talk) 03:57, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Empty.--Fanghong (talk) 00:46, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 03:58, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:49, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 03:58, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:50, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jathinsarang (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images.

--ghouston (talk) 04:22, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:52, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jathinsarang (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos - out of project scope:

Derivative work containing non-free content:

XXN, 23:03, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:06, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jathinsarang (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos and artworks.

~Moheen (keep talking) 22:08, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:33, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jathinsarang (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:46, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iamdjahuof3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images.

--ghouston (talk) 05:26, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:54, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 06:23, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:56, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 06:24, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:58, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 06:33, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:59, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE, COM:NOTUSED jdx Re: 06:55, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:01, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 06:58, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:02, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 07:17, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:03, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ミスでアップしてしまいました。 Gintoma (talk) 08:06, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:04, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CardoLisandro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:13, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Is this group notable? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:15, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, promotional, unused personal photo. RIP iPad 2 (talk) 15:31, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:18, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 16:38, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:19, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[Probadly Youtube-channel spam] out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Grabbed somewhere from Youtube Gunnex (talk) 16:45, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:21, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 17:19, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque es demasiado amplia y tiene mucha ampliedad Elenanextstepper (talk) 17:42, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:24, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not educationally useful. DavidIvar (talk) 18:04, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:26, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used, no other contributions. DavidIvar (talk) 18:12, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:27, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image of undescribed individual. Not used. DavidIvar (talk) 18:14, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:28, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Self-promotion. Not used. No other contributions. DavidIvar (talk) 18:15, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:29, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Raisul2007 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF. Per FBMD... or * probadly grabbed from Facebook + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 18:15, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:33, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. DavidIvar (talk) 18:16, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:31, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:NolanFleming"

[edit]

Private images. Not used. Not educationally useful. --DavidIvar (talk) 18:19, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:35, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. Not educationally useful. DavidIvar (talk) 18:29, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:39, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. Not educationally useful. DavidIvar (talk) 18:29, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:40, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not educationally useful. Not used. No useful description. DavidIvar (talk) 18:39, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:43, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BISHWAJIT PRASAD GOND (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 19:00, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:48, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 21:51, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:52, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:55, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:53, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:56, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:54, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:44, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:56, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:44, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:58, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:46, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:59, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:49, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:01, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:51, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:02, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Grabbed from social media. Gunnex (talk) 23:28, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:03, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 23:37, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:04, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 蔣權瀚 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 08:42, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - unused personal pic from a Flickr stream - probably shouldn't have been transferred INeverCry 22:03, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality (uneven bond angle/length, overlapping text) and jpeg; have png and svg in Category:Polytetrahydrofuran DMacks (talk) 02:09, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 23:53, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality (uneven bond angle/length, pixelated and small) and jpeg; have png and svg in Category:Polytetrahydrofuran DMacks (talk) 02:10, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 23:53, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Taken from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/32921770 without any apparent release, and the license there indicates "all rights reserved", making it incompatible with Commons licensing requirements. Hammersoft (talk) 23:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another version is in Linfa. Nino Marakot (talk) 00:22, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not necessary Frze > talk 01:39, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You should at least tell us why you emptied the category. --Achim (talk) 20:02, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: empty cat. --INeverCry 00:21, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no context, no usage. Hard to use this photo in any way. Krochoman (talk) 02:21, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook.

Rodrigolopes (talk) 02:52, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook.

Rodrigolopes (talk) 02:56, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover of a book published in 2011 Helmoony (talk) 02:58, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Article taken from a newspaper with copyrights (published aroud 2011) Helmoony (talk) 03:00, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful. Image used in a hoax/vandalism page on the English Wikipedia. Sunmist3 (talk) 04:02, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Still copyrighted in the USA, due to URAA. --ghouston (talk) 04:31, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion. Jingiby (talk) 04:48, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'll check if you like. Preliminary tests a) the source country is outside the USA b) published after 1 January 1923 (publication date is 16 April 2015, it's unknown if it was published elsewhere previously.) c) photographs are copyrightable in the USA. So UFAA applies Main tests: a) was the work published in a Berne/WTO country? Yes, Bulgaria b) still in copyright on January 1, 1996? Yes, according to the template on the page, a 70 year rule from publication would apply (2015 + 70 = 2085.) So UFAA applies again. Exceptions: don't apply as far as I know. --ghouston (talk) 05:50, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Actually I take all that back, with a publication date of 2015, URAA is simply irrelevant, but it's nowhere near to public domain. However URAA would be relevant if there were earlier publications, at any time from 1944. --ghouston (talk) 05:52, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PRP. --INeverCry 00:34, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marked as own work created today. No idea where original is from, but it was on Twitter more than two months ago. https://twitter.com/hamiltonkinks/status/731778483316088832 EricEnfermero (talk) 04:44, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. No potential educational uses. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:28, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I suspect this image is a copyright violation. See this webpage for what seems to be the source of the image. However, I mainly frequent English Wikipedia and don't know Commons' policies, so I'm using this method instead of {{Copyvio}}. If Commons' policies allow the template to be placed on the image while this discussion is taking place, I'm ok with someone more experienced than I doing it. Gestrid (talk) 05:47, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: The linked page is a blog, so it's likely the image came from another place that the blog then used on their page. However, this is all a quick Google search came up with. -- Gestrid (talk) 05:50, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The photo image that is being discussed is a photo that I (YMARI)took of Tony Rose and so I suppose this would be considered my copyright. Tony Rose has been using the photo as one of his headshots in his literature and press releases for many years and the blog that Gestrid Googled is one off Tony Rose's uploads with the photo. Please let me know if there is anything more I should do to rectify the discussion at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Tony-rose.jpg. Thank you very much. YMARI YMARI


Deleted: procedural close - the file has already been deleted. --INeverCry 00:34, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. It's a derivative work by an unknown author. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:55, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the uploader says, the photo was taken "From allaboutbelgaum.com", which does not freely license the images on its site Sunnya343 (talk) 05:59, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, cropped, mysteriously watermarked, derived from elsewhere copyrighted content (photo of a photo or painting). Historical photos (or paintings) may be in public domain by other means but relevant info (proper author/date of creation or first disclosure/country of creation information) must be provided to determine copyrights status. Gunnex (talk) 06:31, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted book cover —Andrei S. Talk 06:49, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, lack of exif and quality, as well as setting and subject position suggests this is actually a screenshot from a TV show. —Andrei S. Talk 07:13, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No way to ascertain PD - this is off a Russian blog. MSJapan (talk) 07:23, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AOdlU_z6Z4
http://bxurz.newsvine.com/_news/2014/06/21/24436836-general-george-s-patton-was-assassinated-to-silence-his-criticism-of-allied-war-leaders-claims-new-book
https://filopatria.wordpress.com/2013/01/29/άγνωστες-λεπτομέρειες-του-αντιφασισ/
http://tapnewswire.com/2012/01/operation-market-garden-was-betrayed/
https://twitter.com/ddeisenhower34
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/3869117/General-George-S.-Patton-was-assassinated-to-silence-his-criticism-of-allied-war-leaders-claims-new-book.html
http://galeri.uludagsozluk.com/r/tu-kaka-bana-58525/
https://plus.google.com/+ThegreateststorynevertoldTv/posts/93okzxP9yBH
https://pl.instela.com/m/george-s-patton--i311218
http://allstarpics.famousfix.com/pictures/george-s-patton
https://plus.google.com/103546609263825702390
https://usahitman.com/patton-assassinated/
http://board.lv.ikariam.gameforge.com/user/6688-kaarliis/?s=83d5ae7c1c82c3b88997ce1056b5dbf44df90dbe
http://bellum.com.pl/chlop-z-jajami/
http://quotesgram.com/george-patton-quotes-on-death/

 Keep --Mayyskiyysergeyy (talk) 13:03, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So how does posting a bunch of places you didn't get the image from address the PD issue? Do you understand that you need to post where you actually got the file from? This shows on page two that this is a crop of an image from Corbis, which is now Getty. I would suggest someone check Getty for a lot of these images. MSJapan (talk) 16:00, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination/COM:PRP. --INeverCry 00:37, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Logo besitzt den falschen Hintergrund und ist deswegen nicht offiziell. Eine neue offizielle Version dieses Logo im .svg Format ist bereit hochgeladen. Leonidaz78 (talk) 07:37, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality photos of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope.

LX (talk, contribs) 08:12, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 12:12, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, and since the uploader continues to upload out-of-scope photos instead of commenting here, you can add File:CYMERA 20160425 135523.jpg to the list. The uploader has made no useful contributions whatsoever to any Wikimedia project. Time to start considering a block. LX (talk, contribs) 12:29, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this photo and hoped the aphid could be identified on german Wikipedia identification page (now in the archive, which is the only usage of this photo), but it wasn't. Therer are over 300 unidentified Aphid on commons, so there is no hope of identifying the aphid. All these hairs disturb the image. So this photo is useless für Wikimedia projects and should better be deleted. Biodehio (talk) 08:19, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this photo and hoped the aphid could be identified on german Wikipedia identification page (now in the archive, which is the only usage of this photo), but it wasn't. Therer are over 300 unidentified Aphid on commons, so there is no hope of identifying the aphid. All these hairs disturb the image. So this photo is useless für Wikimedia projects and should better be deleted. Biodehio (talk) 08:20, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this photo and hoped the aphid could be identified on german Wikipedia identification page (now in the archive, which is the only usage of this photo), but it wasn't. Therer are over 300 unidentified Aphid on commons, so there is no hope of identifying the aphid. All these hairs disturb the image. So this photo is useless für Wikimedia projects and should better be deleted. Biodehio (talk) 08:21, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this photo and hoped the aphid could be identified on german Wikipedia identification page (now in the archive, which is the only usage of this photo), but it wasn't. Therer are over 300 unidentified Aphid on commons, so there is no hope of identifying the aphid. All these hairs disturb the image. So this photo is useless für Wikimedia projects and should better be deleted. Biodehio (talk) 08:21, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this photo and hoped the aphid could be identified on german Wikipedia identification page (now in the archive, which is the only usage of this photo), but it wasn't. Therer are over 300 unidentified Aphid on commons, so there is no hope of identifying the aphid. All these hairs disturb the image. So this photo is useless für Wikimedia projects and should better be deleted. Biodehio (talk) 08:21, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not from the US federal government and has the wrong license. It comes from a private website and does not have the attribution, attribution-sharealike or public domain dedication license which Commons accepts. The flickr license is Public Domain mark which means the private copyright owner can change the license at any moment without consequences. He/She does not release any rights with this license. Leoboudv (talk) 08:42, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not from the US federal government and has the wrong license. It comes from a private website and does not have the attribution, attribution-sharealike or public domain dedication license which Commons accepts. The flickr license is Public Domain mark which means the private copyright owner can change the license at any moment without consequences. He/She does not release any rights with this license. Leoboudv (talk) 08:44, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. Unused image, the only upload by the user. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:47, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Flickr stream this is taken from is a fan collection of images of Eddie Izzard. This is the original image [1], but it has an ND licence (the fan stream does state this in the description so they probably used CC-BY-SA by mistake). January (talk) 08:57, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded in error Sandhazeuk (talk) 10:00, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per comments on w:Talk:Relativistic_jet, where the uploader claims there was a permission issue, in relation to the other authors of the paper this image appeared in Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:08, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality (pixelated, low resolution); many better alternatives in Category:Star of David. Leyo 10:12, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo. Commons don't host all the LOLCATS (Com:PORN). Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 10:20, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork of unknown notability. Takeaway (talk) 10:34, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work using photos from news websites, including http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2015-05-16/news/62239453_1_manipur-deputy-chief-minister-gaikhangam-imphal and http://e-pao.net/GP.asp?src=21..170515.may15 and http://media2.intoday.in/indiatoday/images/stories/syed-ahmed_647_092715050334.jpg Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:59, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. May not have enough complexity for copyright, put before community  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:00, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Response

Hi there - I work as part of the PR team for HundrED. I was asked to set up a Wikipedia page on behalf of the organisation, and we wanted to attach the logo as part of this. They hold the copyright for this and I have been given access to use it for this purpose. Please advise on how this can be resolved. --LizMoore2309 (talk) 16:28, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Simple text logo. @LizMoore2309: I've fixed the licensing and categories. --INeverCry 00:42, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work using photos of unclear copyright status; at least one has a watermark from http://www.arkive.org/ and most photos there do not have free licences Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:02, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. According to its description, this image seems a screenshot from an unfree TV show. Uploaded by the same uploader in a short period of time, and cannot provide original links or OTRS info. --TechyanTalk11:50, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Sidelity (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

Sidelity uploaded more images after this deletion request. Please consider delete other images that haven't listed on this page as well. And seems that Sidelity hasn't respond this deletion request yet. In August 6th, Sidelity edited the descriptions of those images. This user changed the source of the images from something like "screenshot", "TV shows" to "own work"(in Chinese). See Special:Contributions/Sidelity. And Sidelity deleted deletion templates. That may violates commons' policies. --TechyanTalk12:44, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored the DR notices (and all the other 'no permission' notices on the files not here). Reventtalk 22:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to its description, this image seems a screenshot from an unfree TV show. TechyanTalk11:25, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion moved to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sidelity. --TechyanTalk11:56, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to its description, this image seems a screenshot from an unfree TV show. TechyanTalk11:25, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion moved to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sidelity. --TechyanTalk11:57, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission.. Community review as amount of originality is limited  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:26, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: tagged as text logo. --INeverCry 00:47, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission.. Put before the community due to lack of complexity in image.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:26, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know what license to select, but both logos (kika and Leiner) are not used anymore. I just tried to update the logos since I was asked by the company. Can somebody please help me. 15.35, 5. August 2016


Kept: tagged as text logo. --INeverCry 00:51, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks fake. if you look closely you can see that the fish has rough edges, as if it was poorly photoshopped The Fun Wimp (talk) 11:41, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per COM:INUSE. --INeverCry 00:51, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks fake. if you look closely you can see that the fish has rough edges, as if it was poorly photoshopped. looks like the user has many just like this. The Fun Wimp (talk) 11:43, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per COM:INUSE. --INeverCry 00:52, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks fake. if you look closely you can see that the fish has rough edges, as if it was poorly photoshopped. looks like the user has many just like this. The Fun Wimp (talk) 11:43, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks fake. if you look closely you can see that the fish has rough edges, as if it was poorly photoshopped. looks like the user has many just like this. The Fun Wimp (talk) 11:45, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks fake. if you look closely you can see that the fish has rough edges, as if it was poorly photoshopped. looks like the user has many just like this. The Fun Wimp (talk) 11:45, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks fake. if you look closely you can see that the fish has rough edges, as if it was poorly photoshopped. looks like the user has many just like this. The Fun Wimp (talk) 11:46, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks fake. if you look closely you can see that the fish has rough edges, as if it was poorly photoshopped. looks like the user has many just like this. The Fun Wimp (talk) 11:47, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks fake. if you look closely you can see that the fish has rough edges, as if it was poorly photoshopped. looks like the user has many just like this. The Fun Wimp (talk) 11:47, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks fake. if you look closely you can see that the fish has rough edges, as if it was poorly photoshopped. looks like the user has many just like this. The Fun Wimp (talk) 11:48, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks fake. if you look closely you can see that the fish has rough edges, as if it was poorly photoshopped. looks like the user has many just like this. The Fun Wimp (talk) 11:49, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per COM:INUSE. --INeverCry 00:54, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks fake. if you look closely you can see that the fish has rough edges, as if it was poorly photoshopped. looks like the user has many just like this. gravel looks stretched The Fun Wimp (talk) 11:50, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks fake. if you look closely you can see that the fish has rough edges, as if it was poorly photoshopped. looks like the user has many just like this. The Fun Wimp (talk) 11:51, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks fake. if you look closely you can see that the fish has rough edges, as if it was poorly photoshopped. looks like the user has many just like this. The Fun Wimp (talk) 11:51, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks fake. if you look closely you can see that the fish has rough edges, as if it was poorly photoshopped. looks like the user has many just like this. The Fun Wimp (talk) 11:52, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks fake. if you look closely you can see that the fish has rough edges, as if it was poorly photoshopped. looks like the user has many just like this. The Fun Wimp (talk) 11:53, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

does this even meet the project's scope? The Fun Wimp (talk) 11:56, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very low quality compared to other pictures of freshwater aquariums. plus we have no idea if this is actually the uploader's own work The Fun Wimp (talk) 12:03, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Use Category:Ships built at Lindholmens varv instead Saftgurka (talk) 12:05, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As a screenshot of a copyrighted television program, this image is not in the public domain and does not meet the criteria for any Creative Commons license. –Matthew - (talk) 12:07, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo can't be own or free Bilderling (talk) 12:47, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Caims to be "PD-old", but the author only died in 1962 (some of his work may be PD as work for the US or UK govt, but that is not claimed in this case) Andy Mabbett (talk) 13:39, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio : this is a copyrighted logo — Sincerely Issimo 15 13:59, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NB : All other files uploaded by this user (problematic user in frwiki) are probably copyvios. Please delete them. — Sincerely Issimo 15 11:47, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Is this book notable? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical newspaper. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What do You mean by "questionable notability"? The documents gives an overview over the publications by Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Wieland. As the publications listed in the Wikipedia Article aren't exhaustive and I keep receiving requests about a complete Bibliography, a separate publication overview would be in my eyes a good completion of the Wikipedia article. I am the author of the document.


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: PDF copy of FSF site page. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like www.ccagalleries.com/gfx/5a43a8b01fa382aca34632c52bd141dc.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.halalaroundme.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/adana-kebab-16-tr-lira5.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from video disc covers. Should be blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stevenfeld (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicate. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:30, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Delia Bordón (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.josepvinaixa.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Avril-Lavigne-Avril-Lavigne-2013-Final-1200x1200.png. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dida242424 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Julianp12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://img.gustfront.com.ar/rep/1503/629463_20150309111556.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong licence: see http://www.bmgf.gv.at/home/Informationen/Impressum (in DE, EN version here); unused lower scale duplicate of File:BMGF Logo.jpg. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:35, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asmer azlef (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-trivial logos and promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:04, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by W.carter as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: There is nothing on this infoboard that says that the map, photos or logos on it are copyrightfree Wdwd (talk) 14:52, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Wdwd, @W.carter - In Poland, effective right to freedom of panorama, look here. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:30, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Jacek Halicki: Thanks for your message! If this indeed do cover also photos, maps and logos, then it should not be any trouble for a editor who know more about these matters, to remove the copyvio tag and you get to keep your picture. Unfortunately, I have been in too many copyright discussions to take anything for granted. Hope this is resolved soon. w.carter-Talk 17:37, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That article covers works of all kinds. The work in this example is the information board, however the maps, photos and logos are an essential part of the board and therefore, in my opinion, de minimis does not apply here. There is little point in taking a picture of the board if all those elements were blacked out or removed, so unfortunately I'd say the file should be deleted. odder (talk) 14:45, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Odder. --INeverCry 01:04, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion because of the maker of the sheet thats on the photo was not giving his permission WeeJeeVee (talk) 15:06, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion because of the maker of the sheet thats on the photo was not giving his permission) (undo) WeeJeeVee (talk) 15:07, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion because of the maker of the sheet thats on the photo was not giving his permission WeeJeeVee (talk) 15:07, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion because of the maker of the sheet thats on the photo was not giving his permission WeeJeeVee (talk) 15:07, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion because of the maker of the sheet thats on the photo was not giving his permission WeeJeeVee (talk) 15:08, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion because of the maker of the sheet thats on the photo was not giving his permission WeeJeeVee (talk) 15:08, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For collages source and license of every used photo is needed. Taivo (talk) 15:10, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional image, out of scope. RIP iPad 2 (talk) 15:26, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is used un en.wiki, so in scope. But this is small photo without metadata and yje uploader's only contribution, maybe copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 19:58, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Taivo/COM:PRP. --INeverCry 01:06, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and possible copyvio. RIP iPad 2 (talk) 15:27, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Likely in scope. But no evidence that the screenshot presents free software. Likely copyvio. Ankry (talk) 16:05, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Ankry. --INeverCry 01:06, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Фотография не соответствует названию. Aleksandr Abrosimov (talk) 15:30, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Machine translation: “Photo does not match the title.”
We can rename the photo rather than deleting it ; would that work for you? Jean-Fred (talk) 14:38, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 01:06, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted material. Original author needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Wikicology (talk) 16:32, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EEE Music World is not mentioned in en.wiki and en:EEE does not mention anything related to music. Probably the logo is out of project scope. Also, this is not a simple logo and needs OTRS-permission from copyright holder. Taivo (talk) 16:33, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted material. David G. Spielman needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Wikicology (talk) 16:34, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. See here. Wikicology (talk) 16:36, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. Melissa Ann Pinney needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Wikicology (talk) 16:39, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This file is necessary to the page because it is the photo for the infobox. Permission from the owner was already granted so there should be no reason for it to be removed. Thanks! Carlisilverman (talk)


Deleted: OTRS permission required. --INeverCry 01:10, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work. Uploader is probably not the copyright holder of the art work. Wikicology (talk) 16:42, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:08, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a low-quality screenshot. Cavarrone (talk) 16:42, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:08, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No "cc-by-sa-4.0" license found at source. There is no clear author stated. Furthermore, the images from the source (Biografieonline) are prohibited from sale, modification, or partial reproduction without the express permission of them according to their Privacy Policy. nicolas talkpage★★★ 00:43, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:57, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image. See the image legal policy here Wikicology (talk) 16:47, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested and received permission from the IDEA Society to use this image.


Deleted: OTRS permission required. --INeverCry 01:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 16:49, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mouldi.d (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, mysteriously watermarked, found elsewhere on web, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Mouldi.d (file cropper, with related copyvios). Uploaded in a row on 27.07.2016 (4 book covers and 1x 283x355 photo) for ar:الرّوائي المولدي ضو (1972–), a Tunisian writer.

Gunnex (talk) 17:01, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 17:05, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not "own work". Copyrighted logo. SummerPhDv2.0 (talk) 17:09, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ayla Allahverdiyeva (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, found elsewhere on the web, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Ayla Allahverdiyeva (with related deleted uploads). Probadly all files taken somewhere from http://www.acsc.az (Copyright © 2016. "Azerbaijan Caspian Shipping" Closed Joint-Stock Company. All rights reserved.)

Gunnex (talk) 17:14, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 17:16, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorreect attribution. Copyright violation. SummerPhDv2.0 (talk) 17:38, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Gunay M.E. (serial copyright violator) Gunnex (talk) 17:41, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad Quality, unused Hiddenhauser (talk) 17:42, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

demasido pixeles Elenanextstepper (talk) 17:43, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Derived from a painting. Historical paintings may be in public domain by other means but relevant info (proper author/date of creation or first disclosure/country of creation information) must be provided to determine copyrights status. Gunnex (talk) 17:44, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. If IN scope needs permission via https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=944895918942191&set=pb.100002653763925.-2207520000.1470332967.&type=3&theater (05.2016, identical FBMD...) Gunnex (talk) 17:51, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 37.164.187.180 17:52, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stefan Kovachev (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF ("2013 Radoslav Parvanov"). Also per FBMD... (2x) grabbed from Facebook.

Gunnex (talk) 17:57, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 18:13, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Signatures are protected with copyright in the United Kingdom. Taivo (talk) 18:19, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of Ghana Football Association is in en.wiki, de.wiki, fr.wiki and ru.wiki as fair use. The logo surpasses clearly threshold of originality and needs OTRS-permission from copyright holder. In my opinion the license does not apply. Taivo (talk) 18:30, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Klemañ29 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status, considering affected by COM:PACKAGING. Uploaded in a row on 25.07.2016. File:Pazenn 4.jpg + File:Pazenn 3.jpg may be borderline.

Gunnex (talk) 18:31, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:10, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyvio. No evidence of permission. Unlikely own work. DavidIvar (talk) 18:34, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:10, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. Uploaded by chinese spam-bot, who is globally blocked. Not used. DavidIvar (talk) 18:42, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:10, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. DavidIvar (talk) 18:44, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:10, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jamesmalike (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, mysteriously edited. Looks like promo material for a TV program © by en:CBC Television

Gunnex (talk) 18:47, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:10, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Probadly grabbed somewhere from social media. Gunnex (talk) 19:47, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:10, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

محفوظة الحقوق User:Izoozo/sinng (talk) 19:58, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:11, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mountainsoil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded since 05.2016 by Mountainsoil (talk · contributions · Statistics) (per user page: "Nasar") all files (despite File:BularungSar1.jpg, taken from a copyrighted source, already tagged with no-permission) appear to be previously published on Flickr or 500px with © All rights reserved by "Nasar Ullah". Examples:

Despite of having a similar username, the Flickr and/or 500px user is not necessarily the same person as the Commons user ("Nasar"). A verifiable connection via COM:OTRS (or by other means) must be established.


Gunnex (talk) 20:30, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:11, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mehmetcrayon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, probadly derived from elsewhere copyrighted content, also per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 20:37, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:12, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of copyrightable artwork with unknown artist. Josve05a (talk) 20:52, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:12, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

as per UDR: {{FoP-Austria}}. Yann (talk) 12:01, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[Blog spam] Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 21:07, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:12, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. No educational value. RIP iPad 2 (talk) 21:09, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A public person ([2]), IMO in scope. But the photo was used since February 2016 as a profile photo (see above link), so a copyvio IMO as no written permission (OTRS) and no evidence of free license provided. Ankry (talk) 16:16, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Ankry. --INeverCry 01:12, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file has been taken from http://adamjehlicka.com/en/Fotky/Hokejove-fotoalbum/Za-HC-METEOR---1--misto_36/ See below: © 2014 Všechna práva vyhrazena Adam Jehlička & ALL-STAR.cz Russian Rocky (talk) 21:10, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:12, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: flag of made-up micronation, article deleted at en:Staplecradic Republic of Channelda JohnCD (talk) 21:29, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:12, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kk2k7it (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF (newspaper/magazine scans etc.) + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 21:40, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:13, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Historical photos may be in public domain by other means but relevant info (proper author/date of creation or first disclosure/country of creation information) must be provided to determine copyrights status. Gunnex (talk) 22:16, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:14, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a test, as the title and description say. It's a squiggle with no possible education value, and it is therefore out of scope. KSFT (talk) 22:19, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:14, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a duplicate that I added twice by mistake Bill Golladay (talk) 22:19, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:14, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paco Serrano R11 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 22:23, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:14, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahmedsahhar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, obviously not own works, probable copyvios.

Yann (talk) 22:27, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:14, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Murdermysterytom (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, mysteriously photoshopped, found elsewhere on the web.

Gunnex (talk) 22:47, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:14, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Probadly grabbed somewhere from social media. Obvious sock of DGBRechtsschutz (talk · contributions · Statistics) = Commons:Deletion requests/File:Der Gewerkschaftliche Rechtsschutz.png Gunnex (talk) 23:15, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:14, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 23:16, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:14, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 23:18, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:14, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panamacontainersolutions (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Probadly derived from elsewhere copyrighted content and grabbed from Internet (website screenshots). User indef blocked at nlwiki.

Gunnex (talk) 23:21, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:14, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[Facebook spam] Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. User indef blocked at nlwiki. Gunnex (talk) 23:31, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:14, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User does not provide proof of ownership. Image is not given the proper release or creative use for use on Commons. Livelikemusic (talk) 23:38, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:14, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful DIPPY 00:06, 5 August 2016 (UTC) 23:55, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

The barnstar is an orphan that hasn't been used in the 8 years since it has been created. It was created for a template which has been deleted [3]. The barnstar was listed for deletion by the original creator on Wikipedia. DIPPY 10:56, 5 August 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:14, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For security, this signature has to be deleted. Tungsten1969 (talk) 00:01, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:14, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: |source=http://www.soldaatvanoranje.nl/de_musical/nieuws/de_cast_is_compleet/58 Sufficiently longstanding to put before community for comment.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:01, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, older publication on the web (19 juil. 2011) and bigger size too. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:06, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - unused blurry photo of a common teacup INeverCry 21:49, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:55, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 21:55, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:55, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - dark, blurry, VERY low quality INeverCry 22:05, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:55, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roberto stelli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal artworks

INeverCry 22:47, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:55, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is clealry a third party logo (Non-free on English Wikipedia) So I fail to see how it can be self/own Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:03, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Retained per outcome in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Windows 7 logo and wordmark.svg. --MBisanz talk 15:13, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - dark, low-quality INeverCry 21:46, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 17:47, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These are all covered by {{PD-CAGov}} as works of the State of California. COM:ABF is not a policy. Legal court precedent trumps copyright notices that the courts have found are invalid. --Elvey (talk) 19:50, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Erm... I meant to file an UNdeletion request. Oops. --Elvey (talk) 19:58, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please use COM:UDR instead - Jcb (talk) 10:57, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and possible copyvio. RIP iPad 2 (talk) 21:17, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely IN SCOPE (used on hiwiki) @RIP iPad 2: why copyvio? Ankry (talk) 16:19, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have added a blank information template, and that would need to be populated for us to determine the retention of the image. Without any detail about the image the PCP would say delete.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:41, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no information about copyright situation. --Jcb (talk) 22:01, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: the image is not available at the Flickr source url and the same image, but cropped, is on the subject's LinkedIn webpage. PCP applies because its copyright status is unknown. Ww2censor (talk) 11:00, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

L'image est disponible ici Flickr-Régis Lefort et dispose des droits suivants CC-BY-SA. Mais peut-être vous est-elle inaccessible pour une raison que j'ignore. Elle existe effectivement ailleurs mais m'a été personnellement confiée par l'auteur pour cette page Wikipdia.
Donc, inutile de supprimer.
En cas de problème, veuillez me recontacter pour tenter de débloquer la situation. Merci. Salutations. GerardGiraud (talk) 12:39, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have a Flickr account the link you gave is for an image on your Flickr account. However, you have only 4 images and this is not one of them. Also, you claim the image is by Régis Lefort, so if he is the copyright holder we need his permission.
J'ai un Flickr compte, mai le lien que vous avez donné est pour une image sur votre compte Flickr. Cependant, vous avez seulement 4 images et ce n'est pas un d'entre eux. En outre, vous réclamez l'image est par Régis Lefort, donc s'il est titulaire du droit d'auteur, nous besoin de son autorisation. S'il vous plaît excuser la traduction de Google. Ww2censor (talk) 13:34, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for anwser. I have two albums on flickr as you can see here GerardGiraud-Albums. Régis's photo is in the Personalities Album.
Please let me know in which form should I have Regis Lefort's permission. Could you show me an example? Thanks. GerardGiraud (talk) 14:58, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Actually on Flickr you only have one album called "Nature" which has 3 images and in your photostream you have four images, the 3 mentioned and one other one. You have no other albums and none called "Personalities" and no image of Régis Lefort anywhere to be found. Because you did not take the photo we need the copyright holder, who is usually the photographer and not the subject, unless it is a selfies, to verify their permission by following the procedure found at COM:OTRS. I can't give you an example because I don't know under what licence the copyright holder will release the image. Ww2censor (talk) 21:42, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's the banner photo at the top of his account. You can see the part of the photo with the top of the head. But I don't know if the whole photo can be viewed. -- Asclepias (talk) 01:54, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's strange since I've twos albums Gerardgiraud-albums ! GerardGiraud (talk) 18:35, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ils ne sont pas visibles pour le public par le lien que vous donnez. Est-il possible que vous les ayez marqués comme albums privés ou quelque chose comme ça ? -- Asclepias (talk) 00:17, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Vous pouvez aussi consulter les mêmes informations en français dans la page Commons:OTRS/fr. Il y a un exemple de déclaration de licence que l'auteur de la photo peut faire parvenir à Wikimedia. -- Asclepias (talk) 01:54, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OK, je vais regarder. Merci. GerardGiraud (talk) 18:35, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: for now, leaving it to the OTRS process. --Jcb (talk) 10:42, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Le problème me semble réglé puisque Régis Lefort lui-même a donné les autorisations requises (y compris celle du photographe) et que lesdites autorisations ont été acceptées voir ==> File:Régis Lefort - 2013.jpg.
Quant au problème avec mon album Flickr, je ne sais pas pourquoi il n'est pas accessible par tous. Ceci dit l'autorisation ci-dessus me semble surpasser ce problème. Cordialement. GerardGiraud (talk) 08:11, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Put before community for review  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:19, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:43, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Put before community for review.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:20, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:41, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work Long time held and used photo, put before the community  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:22, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The poster has been uploaded here by the film producer/copyright holder. No copyright violation has happened. Thanks for your attention.--Pejman7 (talk) 13:08, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strong  Keep See comment by Pejman7. Photo is being used in 7 articles. --173.55.239.44 21:51, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence that the uploader is in fact the copyright holder, please contact OTRS to fix this. --Jcb (talk) 10:39, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bandera inexistente. Ver Victor Ayala Queirolo. "Origen y evolucion de la bandera nacional. Anibalcesar (talk) 15:17, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use / en uso. --Jcb (talk) 10:27, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]