Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/07/27
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
This text is obviously incorrect and appears to be an advertisement. KSFT (talk) 00:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Speedy delete: Just vandalism in Subtitles.
Deleted: Deleted by INeverCry as 'nonsense'. --Reventtalk 16:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Arun11kc1985
[edit]Hi,
All Arun11kc1985's uploads are stock photo attributed to Source: Bing images; Author: Bing. Effectively, they can be found on several websites.
- File:Doc 10 Chen.jpg (image search)
- File:Doc 9 Betsy.jpg
- File:Doc 4 Ruby.jpg
- File:Doc 6 Adams.jpg
- File:Doc 7 Pamela.jpg
- File:Doc 1 Christine.jpg
- File:Doc 2 mike.jpg
- File:Doc 3 Kavitha.jpg
- File:Annabeeelllee.jpg (image search)
Regards, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 16:44, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Looking at User talk:Arun11kc1985#Deleted content, I found this is about the same first-names than in the batch deleted by Thibaut120094. It could be a re-upload of the same pictures. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 16:54, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:04, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
possible copyright violation Frze > talk 04:09, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Test page, accidental creation, or page containing nonsense or no valid content Elirules190 (talk) 18:40, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by INeverCry: Test page, accidental creation, or page containing nonsense or no valid content
ダブらせてしまいました TORANSU (talk) 09:02, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 03:32, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Yiyi
[edit]- File:Wikimania 2016 - Hackathon opening (08).jpg
- File:Wikimania 2016 - Hackathon opening (07).jpg
- File:Wikimania 2016 - Hackathon opening (06).jpg
- File:Wikimania 2016 - Hackathon opening (05).jpg
- File:Wikimania 2016 - Hackathon opening (04).jpg
- File:Wikimania 2016 - Hackathon opening (03).jpg
- File:Wikimania 2016 - Hackathon opening (02).jpg
- File:Wikimania 2016 - Hackathon opening (01).jpg
- File:Wikimania 2016 - Silent action walk (01).jpg
- File:Wikimania 2016 - Silent action walk (02).jpg
- File:Wikimania 2016 - Silent action walk (03).jpg
- File:Wikimania 2016 - Silent action walk (04).jpg
- File:Wikimania 2016 - University education (01).jpg
- File:Wikimania 2016 - University education (02).jpg
- File:Wikimania 2016 - University education (03).jpg
- File:Wikimania 2016 - University education (04).jpg
These files are duplicate of other files. I uploaded them by mistake (with incorrect name). --Yiyi (Dimmi!) 10:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy, duplicates. --Reventtalk 18:43, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Melixnakas (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of user's own work on these pageant photos, more likely - given the sizes - to be copied from unattributed sources.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Melixnakas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shingling334 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:52, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Josve05a (talk) 19:38, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation MikaelF (talk) 18:20, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Ellin Beltz: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
Clearly an album cover, with no obvious permission. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:48, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by INeverCry: No permission since 22 July 2016
This seems to be third party promo artwork, (non free at enwiki) so I don't see how this is self. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:37, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Billinghurst: Copyright violation: This image is the title card of SummerSlam (2016). It is non-free and not created by the uploader as claimed.
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:12, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yabgu~commonswiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]I cant find this images in provided by the uploader sourse, but I can see there clear copyright: © 2016 «Dolores-travel» I dont have idea, why uploader set license "Copyrighted free use"
Cap1000 (talk) 01:28, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of sccope - unused personal image Rssäl₰ 01:39, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vaniadeonizio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Used for advertising purposes on English wikipedia.
EvergreenFir (talk) 01:55, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Dubious licensing. Based on the usage of this image at en:Luke Flowers (now speedy deleted), which was an unsourced BLP that spoke negatively of the subject, I highly doubt the uploader is also the subject. It seems highly unlikely that he would speak ill of himself. BU Rob13 (talk) 01:56, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
This looks to be a scan of a printed source -- and it's in a "postcards" group on Flickr. The Flickr license cannot be valid if a postcard. Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:37, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Svg available at File:Coat of Arms of Esporles (Mallorca).svg Ionutzmovie (talk) 02:40, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Also include File:Escut d'Esporles.jpg.Ionutzmovie (talk) 02:41, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --INeverCry 00:19, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
This group of images are all historical images, which may be old enough to be kept, however each one is labeled "own work" and no sources are given. Due to the ages of the images, the lack of metadata and the single area covered by these uploads, it's more likely they were culled from a variety of sources and were not self created.
- File:Waterford Village School 1927-2014.jpg
- File:Village of Waterford, Michigan map.jpg
- File:Windiate hotel dock.jpg
- File:Deer Lake Inn Hotel Resort.jpg
- File:DLI Hotel.jpeg.jpg
- File:Windiate Park Depot Sign.jpg
- File:Original Clarkston Michigan Depot.jpg
- File:Windiate ad.jpg
- File:Clarkston MI Depot.jpg
- File:Deer Lake Inn.jpg
- File:Waterford vill Michigan.jpg
- File:Waterford Hill.jpg
- File:Waterford hill.jpg
- File:Lahdedahs.jpg
- File:Lester lake culvert.jpg
- File:Post office and store Waterford.jpg
- File:Windiate Depot.jpg
- File:Waterford mill.jpg
- File:Waterford depot.jpg
- File:Old mill tavern.jpg
- File:Waterford grand river.jpg
- File:Waterford hotel.jpg
- File:J.R Jones Waterford General Store.jpg
- File:Old Mill TavernIMG 3379.jpg
- File:Waterford General Store.jpg
- File:Windiate Park Hotel Resort.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:28, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Three images of two paintings, claimed as 'own work'. Notice besides that the uploader did not paint the pictures, that there are three cameras at work. COM:COPYVIOs without COM:OTRS from both painters.
- File:Waterford Train Depot.jpg
- File:Waterford Village circa1900.jpg
- File:Waterford Village c1900.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Seemingly nonsense uploads. Note the nonsense descriptions, usually "photo", and the missing or nonsense categories. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of project scope.
- File:Ziebart -It's Us. Or Rust ad.jpg
- File:Ziebart logo (1998).jpg
- File:Ziebart Tidy Car logo (1989).jpg
- File:Ziebart logo (1962).jpg
- File:Ziebart logo (1990).png
- File:Ziebart logo (1998).png
- File:Clintonville Elementary School.jpg
- File:Elizabeth Lake, Michigan.jpg
- File:William Terry grave marker, first post master of Elizabeth Lake, MI.jpg
- File:Four Towns church.jpg
- File:Four Towns Cemetery.jpg
- File:Clintonville, 1872.png
- File:Drayton Plains one-room schoolhoue.jpg
- File:Drayton Plains Nature Center.jpg
- File:Tenuta's (1963).jpg
- File:Daniel Windiate grave marker.jpg
- File:Sayles Studio 4431 Dixie Hwy (c.1940s).jpg
- File:Drayton Plains Cemetery.jpg
- File:Clarkston train depot.jpg
- File:Deer Lake from Deer Lake Beach.jpg
- File:5954 Andersonville Road.jpg
- File:Detroit Area Council patch.jpg
- File:Clinton Valley Council patch.jpg
- File:Townsend Lake (Independence Township, Michigan).jpg
- File:Greens Lake from Bay Court Park.jpg
- File:Van Norman Lake from Waterford Hill Beach.jpg
- File:Lester Lake from Andersonville Road Bridge.jpg
- File:Waterford Hill from Van Norman Lake.jpg
- File:5941 Dixie Highway.jpg
- File:6251 Balmoral Terrace.jpg
- File:6251 Balmoral Terr (built in 1935).png
- File:5941 Dixie Hwy (built in 1918).jpg
- File:Waterford Village storefronts.jpg
- File:JR Jones Waterford General Store.jpg
- File:Windiate Depot.png
- File:Waterford Village Historic District 5954 Andersonville Rd (3).jpg
- File:5954 Andersonville Rd.jpg
- File:Waterford Village Cemetery.jpg
- File:Waterford Village barn.jpg
- File:Waterford Village School.jpg
- File:Targal house.jpg
- File:Pontiac Mall.jpg
- File:CN Airport Rd. crossing.jpg
- File:Windiate Park Depot Site.jpg
- File:Waterford Train Depot Site.jpg
- File:D,GH&M Railway logo.jpg
- File:CN Waterford Michigan Station.jpg
- File:CN Windiate Rd crossing.jpg
- File:CN Frembes Rd crossing.jpg
- File:CN Airport Rd crossing.jpg
- File:Waterford Village Historic District 5887 Andersonville Rd.jpg
- File:Drayton Plains train depot sign.jpg
- File:CN crossing Frembes Rd Waterford.jpg
- File:CN crossing Hatchery Rd Waterford.jpg
- File:CN crossing Watkins Lake Rd Waterford.jpg
- File:CN crossing Scott Lake Rd Waterford.jpg
- File:CN Telegraph Rd bridge Waterford.jpg
- File:RXR crossing sign.jpg
- File:Waterford Village Historic District, 4350 Pontiff Street.jpg
- File:Quake on the Lake poster.jpg
- File:Loon Lake hydroplane races 1964.jpg
- File:Drayton Plains depot sign.jpg
- File:Waterford Village 1950.jpg
- File:Abandoned Waterford Depot.jpg
- File:OLL Catholic School.jpg
- File:Waterford Community Church.jpg
- File:5840 Dixie Hwy (3).jpg
- File:Clarkston MI Train Depot.jpg
- File:Bay Court sign.jpg
- File:Bay Court Park bell tower.jpg
- File:5967 AR.jpg
- File:5887 AR.jpg
- File:5853 AR.jpg
- File:Airport Rd House.jpg
- File:Stone House Airport Rd and Andersonville Rd.jpg
- File:Pontiac Press.jpg
- File:Camp agawam.jpg
- File:Camp Brady Michigan.jpg
- File:Van Norman Lake Michigan.jpg
- File:Waterford village cemetery.jpg
- File:Waterford Village school.jpg
Ies (talk) 15:45, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Images of work by an apparently living painter, without permission from the painter.
- File:В.К. Лебедко. Живые вещи. 2006 г. Бумага, свинцовый карандаш, 65х50.jpg
- File:В.К.Лебедко. Человек, которого не боятся птицы. 1995-1996. Холст, масло, 90х70.jpg
- File:В.К.Лебедко. Островок. Мои озера. 2010 г. Картон, масло, 45х41, Витебск, Браславщина.jpg
- File:В.К. Лебедко. «Последний луч». Холст, масло,1580х620,. 2008 г.jpg
- File:Мои воспоминания. Детство 171-70 см х. масло. 1975-1989 г.jpg
- File:В. К. Лебедко «Тайна острова Городище», 1987 г., Холст, масло. 58х47, Витебск, Езерище.jpg
- File:В. К. Лебедко «Портрет отца».jpg
- File:В К Лебедко. Натюрморт в заброшенном уголке.jpg
- File:Детство. Мое Езерище. Витебск, 1989-1990 гг. Холст, масло, 74х107.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:34, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this aerial photo, the other uploads of this type by this uploader were copied from other websites. No metadata, odd size, no indication of user's own work. COM:PRP. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:39, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jean Luc Pypaert (talk · contribs)
[edit]Artwork by recent artist Paul Timper, no permissions. COM:OTRS from the artist would be required to keep two, the other is a three dimensional object and the photographer's permission would also be needed.
- File:Paul Timper - Nu.jpg
- File:Paul Timper - Paysage.jpg
- File:Paul Timper fresque.jpg
- File:Paul Timper.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:41, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on these two similar images.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:45, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
advertising DavidIvar (talk) 04:03, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Santo Antônio empunhando a cruz de Cristo na mão direita e o menino Jesus no braço esquerdo no altar-mor..jpg
[edit]no indication of who created the image or the license at source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:04, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Is the license "for you to use my photographs on Wikipedia under GFDL" sufficient?
- Also affected
- File:111Commissioner2.jpg
- File:112Main1.jpg
- File:112Main2.jpg
- and the other images of this type which can be seen at the user's upload summaries. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:12, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
It was an accidental upload. Sabstion (talk) 04:31, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
The flickr user does not own the copyrights on the posters he collects. He can't license them. -- Asclepias (talk) 05:36, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
suspected copyvio Rama (talk) 05:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Suspected copyvio: exceptionally interesting, very low-resolution and only upload by user, probably a screenshot of a copyrighted (non-Free) video. Rama (talk) 05:47, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
PS: When I say "suspected", I mean I am putting up this DR mostly to buy a little bit a time to replace the image due to its interest. This is speedy deletion material. Rama (talk) 05:51, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
From what it appears, the painting may well be copyrighted in the US even though it is likely out of copyright in Finland. The license tag mentions that "works of art" are copyrighted for 70 years p.m.a. in Finland; assuming that the artist died in 1937, then the painting would have passed out of copyright in Finland around 2008 (1937 + 70 = 2007.) As such, it would have been copyrighted in Finland in 1996. Assuming that the painting is of Finnish (not US) origin, that it was published in or after 1923 (the page gives a date of 1926, suggesting that any publication would have been after 1922), and was still under copyright in Finland in 1996, then its US copyright would have been restored under the URAA even if it had been published in noncompliance with US copyright formalities. (The image's license tag also mentions a situation where a Finnish work's copyright expires 70 years after publication if the work was anonymous. Assuming that the painting was published in 1926, then the Finnish copyright would have expired around 1996 (1926 + 70 = 1996), which still might be too close regarding the URAA cutoff year of 1996.) Gazebo (talk) 06:04, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
The Flickr user credits an image by somebody else, on Google Street View, so not clear that it has a license from the copyright holder. --ghouston (talk) 06:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I'm somewhat horrified that I did not spot the typical Google Streetview items in the corner of the image before I uploaded this. I've had a further look at that and here's a link to the photographer's homepage. Everything is fully copyrighted. Schwede66 18:25, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Photo of an unfree two-dimensional artwork. January (talk) 06:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 06:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 06:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Meaningless redirect.--N-C16 (talk) 07:05, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
blurry, out of scope Xgeorg (talk) 07:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: small resolution version of this image is used in http://www.saytest.com/Distributor-Team.php, but the name of the person is different. MKFI (talk) 07:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stoyangeorgiev (talk · contribs)
[edit]All uploads by this user are suspected copyright violations taken from different sites, eg. http://www.tunzafunxtreme.com.au/fun-climbing/, http://www.tunzafunxtreme.com.au/value-packs/, http://adventure.walltopia.com/adventure-hub/itemlist/tag/Funtopia, http://www.walltopia.com/en/climbing-walls/fun-walls.
- File:VOLCANO WALL.jpg
- File:CRATE CHALLENGE.jpg
- File:FIREMAN’S WALL.jpg
- File:THE LABYRINTH.jpg
- File:THE GEARHEAD.jpg
- File:SPEED WALL.jpg
- File:COMMANDO LADDER.jpg
- File:3ROCKTOPIA GRANITE.jpg
- File:2-1TYRES1.jpg
- File:GEOMETRIX.jpg
- File:JHP0248.jpg
- File:The chimney.jpg
- File:Funtopia in Sofia, Paradise Center.jpg
MKFI (talk) 07:28, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Ritchiesudarshan/logs (file cropper, 4 uploads on 05.05.2015 = 3 x copyvio) Gunnex (talk) 07:31, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Info Again cropped by uploader (see user talk), probadly grabbed from (example) http://chaibisket.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/ameen-peer-dargah-Tripadvicer.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 07:36, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
ancienne photo Mairie de Pontacq (talk) 07:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:32, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rajeshraj28 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seem to be taken from http://www.cemuttathara.org/gallery.htm
- File:View 1 DSC00398 - Copy.jpg
- File:FRONT VIEW DSC00209 - Copy.jpg
- File:COLLEGE FRONT VIEW 2 DSC00217 - Copy.jpg
- File:COLLEGE ENTRANCE DSC00198 - Copy.jpg
--ghouston (talk) 07:34, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AbdulRazaAkram (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Per * or FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook. Uploaded in a row on 27.03.2016. Considering also File:AmeenPeerMalikYM-KSSAH.jpg, cropped from Facebook (02.2016) or File:KSSAH2.jpg versus Facebook (2015). File:12734153 1768644640032056 6676761878817583716 njpeg.jpg (despite per file title already suggesting Facebook grab) may have additionally a FOP issue (not ok for 2D).
- File:KSSAH-Smile.jpg
- File:KSSAH2.jpg
- File:AmeenPeerMalikYM-KSSAH.jpg
- File:KSSAH-Naubat Khana-.jpg
- File:KSSAH.jpg
- File:12734153 1768644640032056 6676761878817583716 njpeg.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 07:41, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Querying this logo on TOO grounds with respect to the stylised M, ( Another version of this logo is on enwiki under non-free terms). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:52, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Weak keep: You should explain why the logo is bellow or above the TOO: the fact that the logo is in the English Wikipedia as Fair use is irrelevant (specially if is not exactly the same). And well, seems simple for me, even in the UK maybe. --Amitie 10g (talk) 08:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- I am slightly concerned that the M centere top is not mere typogrpahy but a stylised graphic design. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP. --INeverCry 00:35, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Apparent reupload of image deleted previously, I was (via alternate account) the nominator then and the same concern about the stylised M applies. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:18, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:57, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Unclear descriptions (ex : Es un peluche con forma de lagarto) ; very blurred photos ; unknown locations : so out of project scope because no educational usefulness
- File:Cara de madera.jpg
- File:Peluche de un lagarto.jpg
- File:Bide blanco.jpg
- File:Bote de Sal.jpg
- File:Planta artificial.......Bambú.jpg
- File:Altavoz de sonido.jpg
Tangopaso (talk) 07:52, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
possible copyright violation, photographer was Arthur Dearden but I can't find this date of birth or death Alabasterstein (talk) 08:26, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you;
Delete per COM:PRP if no date of death more than 70 years ago can be found (not an anonymous work, Dearden's name is on the photo, and it's quite possible that the photographer of an 1899 photo died less than 70 years ago). Gestumblindi (talk) 21:36, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lydiana carely (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images all seem copied from the internet but uploaded as "own work". Probable copyright violations.
- File:Jun Hong Lu 2012 Harvard University.jpg
- File:Jun Hong Lu 2016 Spain.jpg
- File:Jun Hong Lu 2015 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.jpg
- File:Jun Hong Lu 2015 Johor, Malaysia.jpg
- File:Jun Hong Lu 2016 Singapore.jpg
- File:Jun Hong Lu 2016 Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Jun Hong Lu 2015 Sabah, Malaysia.jpg
- File:Jun Hong Lu 2014 Hong Kong.jpg
Takeaway (talk) 08:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Verletzung des Urheberrechts, BMH Bräutigam, Zeichen: 00214-16/147/ib 8 Khdolun (talk) 08:35, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
There is a problem with the color display. I will upload a new file. Rasool Sarang (talk) 08:53, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hypnotized Movementz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.
- File:7d39ac6090-rap beats free beats.png
- File:Rap beats hypnotized movementz.png
- File:Beatsforsale.jpg
- File:Rap Beats .png
Gunnex (talk) 09:04, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
advertising DavidIvar (talk) 09:12, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Bandspam, out of scope, del on DE Nolispanmo 09:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Bandspam, out of scope, del on DE Nolispanmo 09:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Mi intención no es subir este archivo pdf, si no crear la pagina de este personaje publico CRCsanz (talk) 09:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
mistake : no aircraft on sight Marc Lacoste (talk) 09:18, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- This was named by mistake, photo title should be "Biscane Waterway South Beach Miami by D Ramey Logan" but Marc Lacoste, if it makes you feel better to delete it you go right ahead and delete away I could care less.--WPPilot (talk) 12:50, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:34, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
out of scope, del on DE Nolispanmo 09:19, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Rechte sind eingehalten, Foto wurde von mir selber erstellt. dient als beleg und auflockerung des nur textes
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
pers. rights, out of scope, del on DE Nolispanmo 09:19, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Rechte sind eingehalten, Foto wurde von mir selber erstellt. dient als beleg und auflockerung des nur textes
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Obraniff766/logs = 5 uploads regarding en:Exploris = 4x copyvio. Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 09:19, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:HenryMedina
[edit]- File:Custom papers.jpg
- File:Custom paper writing service.jpg
- File:Custom essay.jpg
- File:Custom dissertation writing service.jpg
- File:Custom essay writing - Copy.jpg
- File:Custom essay writing service.jpg
- File:Best paper writing service.jpg
- File:Cheap essay writing service.jpg
- File:Best Authenticative Online Writing Service.jpg
Advertising. Possibly copyvio. Watermarked and probably redundant. No evidence of permission or own work. --DavidIvar (talk) 09:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
This is not real map 109.252.72.175 09:35, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:36, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Нет АИ. Фальсификация 212.154.56.32 22:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep COM:INUSE. The Russian translates as "No AI." I don't see how that's relevant. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:35, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- The Russian says "No RS", meaning "reliable sources". It also says that this is a hoax. Ymblanter (talk) 19:05, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for giving the proper translation. I should have stated that it Google-translated the way I stated. But the problem is, even if it's a hoax, it can't be deleted as long as it's in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:25, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: not own work but screengrab, and DW of map background. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:48, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
com:DW and com:SCOPE. Questionable notability of the artist Natuur12 (talk) 09:45, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Naznin Qureshi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear descriptions (ex : A tree with amazing naturally obtained texture at Mumbai) ; generic file names (ex : Fauna1.jpg) ; very unprecise cats (ex : Flora) ; unknown or vague locations ; unknown genus and species of plants and animals : so out of project scope because no educational usefulness
- File:Silent Roar.jpg
- File:Tri coloured rocks.jpg
- File:Sunlit.jpg
- File:Fauna1.jpg
- File:Fly on the Rock.jpg
- File:Rivulet1.jpg
- File:Coarse.jpg
- File:Natures' Buoy.jpg
Tangopaso (talk) 09:49, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Unclear description (Scenery) ; generic file name (Rive.jpg) ; No category ; unknown location ; unknown genus and species of plants : so out of project scope because no educational usefulness Tangopaso (talk) 09:52, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by McgilvreyJeremy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope - personal photos. Promotional user-page deleted at en:User:McgilvreyJeremy.
JohnCD (talk) 09:53, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Unclear description ; vague generic file name ; Unprecise cat (Flora) ; unknown location (where in Kashmir ?) ; unknown genus and species of trees : so out of project scope because no educational usefulness Tangopaso (talk) 10:11, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
the licence provided is a free license but the description states it has a non-commercial restriction which we do not accept - OTRS permission of a free license is necessary or it must be deleted. Ww2censor (talk) 10:18, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- It is a free license- I read over the FAQ and image pages, and am new to Wikipedia- could you clarify what I need to get to prove that it is a free license? Thanks so much! Comeongerry (talk) 14:24, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- There is no link to the image, so how can we verify the license is free as you claim? If the image is not online, where did you get it from? You will have to get the copyright holder, who is probably Phyllis Meredith, to verify her permission by following the procedure found at COM:OTRS unless she sold the copyright to the subject. Thanks. Ww2censor (talk) 14:31, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Got it- owner Phyllis Meridith will email following the COM:OTRS protocol. Thanks Comeongerry (talk) 14:49, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Good luck. I hope that works out for you but be patient as the OTRS volunteers are often backed up sometimes for several weeks. Once she has done so you can add a {{OTRS pending}} template to the image. Ww2censor (talk) 17:32, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
The same pic was used in several websites before. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 10:19, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
High risk of copyvio Floflo62 (talk) 10:34, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Tiny image (no significant metadata) by a user whose only en:wp edit was the creation of spam about the amusement park where this was taken. I can't find this image on their website, but (1) at such a low resolution, it's not particularly useful, and (2) when someone's creating spam for a business, it's unlikely that the same person would be taking his own aerial pictures of the business's grounds. Nyttend (talk) 10:41, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
These files are blurry, unused, and unusable selfies.
- File:3ee6xty5ive,3ee6xty5iveforeverIMG 20160702 184549.jpg
- File:3ee6xty5ive,3ee6xty5iveforever2016-07-01 05-07-58.jpg
- File:3ee6xty5ive,3ee6xty5iveforeverIMG 20160707 095829.jpg
- File:3ee6xty5iveforever,3ee6xty5iveIMG 20160702 184037.jpg
- File:3ee6xty5ive,3ee6xty5iveforeverIMG 20160708 034246.jpg
KSFT (talk) 10:48, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
very dark screenshots if that's what they are, uncategorized, unusable
Mjrmtg (talk) 10:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
photo is watermarked twice, copyvio Mjrmtg (talk) 10:51, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:54, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
low resolution unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:55, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
This file is a very blurry picture of an unidentified person. It is out of scope per COM:SELFIE, and the description is nonsense. KSFT (talk) 11:01, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Fake license, logo can't be own or free Bilderling (talk) 11:34, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
English Wikipedia considered this logo non-free, DR for second opinion. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:39, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
This is a coin design, I fail to see how it can be self work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:45, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
This is a screenshot fo third party website/software, I fail to see how it can be self-work Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:46, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Third party logo, I faill to see how this (if official) is Creative Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:47, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photos, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:48, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photos, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Third party logo , Can't see why this is self, but myabe be below TOO Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
This is a logo, I fail to see how it's self-work, nor how it's below TOO. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:53, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
This is an old photo, so I am not entiryl sure it's self as claimed, given that the duplicate at enwiki is under non-free criteria, with a differenet source. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:54, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
This is a third party medal design. enwiki duplicate is considered Non-free. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:55, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Threshold of originality concern (UK) given the stylised Yo-Yo design to the left of the image. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:58, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
THis is a third party logo, so I can't see how it's a self -pd style license. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Too simple. Just change the license to {{PD-textlogo}} instead. --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Are you sure it's below threshold of originality? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:03, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- Are you sure it is not bellow the TOO in the United States? Why? No complex shapes, no gradient. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:15, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: text logo. --INeverCry 00:39, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AbhikhyaMadonna (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear descriptions (ex : Exquisite Creation) ; generic file names (ex : Fecund.jpg) ; very unprecise cats (ex : Flora) ; unknown locations ; unknown genus and species of plants : so out of project scope because no educational usefulness
- File:Crystalliferous.jpg
- File:Fecund.jpg
- File:Exuberant.jpg
- File:La fermeté.jpg
- File:Flamboyance.jpg
Tangopaso (talk) 12:01, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Unclear description ; generic file name (Flora of himalayas is not only mosses !) ; very unprecise cats (Flora, Mountains) ; unknown location ; unknown genus and species of plants : so out of project scope because no educational usefulness Tangopaso (talk) 12:11, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Bla-bla description ; generic file name ; very unprecise cats (Flora, Nature of India, Green) ; unknown location ; unknown genus and species of plants : so out of project scope because no educational usefulness Tangopaso (talk) 12:13, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
screenshot of tv: no authorization Benoît Prieur (d) 12:26, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
no authorization Benoît Prieur (d) 12:31, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
no authorization Benoît Prieur (d) 12:31, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
no authorization Benoît Prieur (d) 12:31, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
no authorization Benoît Prieur (d) 12:31, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
no authorization Benoît Prieur (d) 12:31, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
no authorization Benoît Prieur (d) 12:32, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
no authorization Benoît Prieur (d) 12:32, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
no authorization Benoît Prieur (d) 12:32, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
This page does not reflect my work appropriately and I as the author of this novel wish for this to be removed. Tabislick (talk) 12:47, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation Tuluqaruk (talk) 13:10, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Image description lists Heneghan Peng Architects & Arup Ingenieure as origin. User:Markus Gabler claims copyright --Tuluqaruk (talk) 13:13, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Changed copyright to Heneghan Peng Architects User:Markus Gabler
- @Markus Gabler: Are you affiliated with Heneghan Peng? If so, please provide a permission to use the image by the copyright holder (see Commons:OTRS for procedure). --Tuluqaruk (talk) 13:31, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
This logo was uploaded for the de:wp article de:CityKolleg which was subsequently deleted as being not notable. Since then this logo remained unused. Hence, this logo appears to be out of COM:SCOPE. AFBorchert (talk) 13:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Not in use. Lot of commercials. Spamer's contribution.
- File:Здание iT-Колледжа.png
- File:Журнал про iT-резиденцию, страница 9.jpg
- File:Журнал про iT-резиденцию, страница 8.jpg
- File:Журнал про iT-резиденцию, страница 7.jpg
- File:Журнал про iT-резиденцию, страница 6.jpg
- File:Журнал про iT-резиденцию, страница 5.jpg
- File:Журнал про iT-резиденцию, страница 4.jpg
- File:Журнал про iT-резиденцию, страница 3.jpg
- File:Журнал про iT-резиденцию, страница 2.jpg
- File:Журнал про iT-Резиденцию, страница 1.jpg
Bilderling (talk) 13:17, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Derived work of a book cover which was published in 1979. This is obviously not out of copyright, it is eligible for copyright, and no proof of permission is provided. AFBorchert (talk) 13:19, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Selfie, no educational value, wrong category Berthold Werner (talk) 13:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal images, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:29, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Personal photo used in deleted attack page en:Harry Slider. JohnCD (talk) 13:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:44, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:47, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Faheemuddin mohd (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope. Commons is not the place to post one's personal photo and CV; the three logos are unused except on this user's pages, may be copyright, and there are already en:File:ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund Official Logo.jpg, en:File:Kotak Mahindra Group logo.svg and File:Genpact logo cmyk.jpg,
JohnCD (talk) 13:56, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Neeta(aaysha) sharma (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Neeta(aaysha) sharma (talk · contribs)
[edit]These are promo photo scans of this person, not own work as claimed (see exif of other uploads for own work)
—SpacemanSpiff 21:19, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Vlad Yamburskyy.jpg
- File:Vlad Yambursryy.jpg
- File:The stray.jpg
- File:День переможених.jpg
- File:Влад Ямбурский.JPG
- File:Ямненко Владимир 1.jpg
- File:Голубович Михаил.jpg
- File:Ямбурский.jpg
- File:Шеремет.jpg
- File:Ямбурский В.jpg
- File:Денис.jpg
- File:Линартович.jpg
- File:Голубович.jpg
- File:Корецкий Константин 1.jpg
- File:Корецкий Константин.jpg
- File:Исаенко Андрей.jpg
- File:Ямненко Владимир.jpg
- File:Лозовский Станислав.jpg
- File:Линартович Константин.jpg
- File:Линартович 2.jpg
- File:Галицкий.jpg
- File:Кобизька 2.jpg
- File:Исаенко.jpg
- File:Исаенко 1.jpg
- File:Лозовский 1.jpg
- File:Лозовский.jpg
- File:Горбенко 1.jpg
- File:Горбенко.jpg
- File:Ямненко.jpg
- File:Маркова Таня.jpg
- File:Дети.jpg
- File:Веретенников.JPG
- File:Кобизька.jpg
- File:Константин Линартович.jpg
- File:Ямбурский, Валерий Вячеславович.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:47, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:47, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:47, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
the 2013 GQ Men of the Year Awards were in London (http://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/gq-men-year-awards-full-2248509). Bollywood Hungama explicitly excludes 'non-Indian events' from their licensing, thus the file is unlicensed and needs to go away. Reventtalk 14:17, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Chinese government images are not exempt from copyright. January (talk) 14:19, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Used inappropriately on talk page. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Uploader claims this is free because it was from German Wikipedia, I can't see what licence it was under there because they are now using this version but it is obviously not the uploader's own work and is complex enough for copyright. January (talk) 14:24, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jenkins8934 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused maps of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused low quality photo of train. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Italy.svg. Fry1989 eh? 14:32, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Starlinemgmt (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Crown Beatz in Kanye Studio.jpg
- File:Crown Beatz in Studio.jpg
- File:Crown Beatz in Brooklyn.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello There,
I'm not sure why you want to delete this photo? What do i have to do to keep it up? Specifically what is the problem with this photo?
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PanzerMann9000 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://artistpictures.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/slipknot-10022015-14.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jennyabamu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://buzzghana.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Guru.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KristinaLupa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertisement and non-trivial logos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Snowhite.jpg
- File:Baccarat - shearling coat.jpg
- File:Lupa Fashion House.gif
- File:Shearling jacket.jpg
- File:Lusta logo.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Giudicato di Cagliari.jpg and other maps
[edit]Wrong license and possible copyviol (maps are copyrighted 70 years after the author's death, and these ones were published in 1935). The same holds for other files by possible sockpuppets of User:Gottardo10:
- File:Giudicato di Torres.jpg
- File:Giudicato di Gallura (Sardegna).jpg
- File:Giudicato di Arborea 1.png
- File:Giudicato di Cagliari.jpg
Ruthven (msg) 14:39, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:River1948.png
- File:River-Piauí-png.png
- File:Pi River.png
- File:1534307 4982gaga43966971237 6987161059834950484 n.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Not that I think we need all these (one of the nominated files is actually a redirect I created from removing another duplicate) but the football club itself has articles on twelve different Wikipedias, per d:Q3458836, and the one on ptwiki is quite long. I don't think the notability is really questionable. Reventtalk 18:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --INeverCry 00:50, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:43, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:47, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused map of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
old photo irrelevant Stephcouturier (talk) 14:43, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. In use. Even if it weren't in use, the nominator has not explained how this photo would be irrelevant. -- Asclepias (talk) 22:46, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:50, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arg SergioCarp (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial signs of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Señal R NoAvan.png
- File:Señal I Park.png
- File:Señal P EmpZurd.png
- File:Señal P Cross.png
- File:Señal P CurvIzq.png
- File:Señal R NoPark.png
- File:Señal O Working.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Sure!
[edit]Please, delete this file also: File:BSicon MWCROSS.svg
-Arg SergioCarp (talk) 21:46, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Unused photo and its copyright status is unclear ("photo courtesy of UPS"). jdx Re: 14:44, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Unused is not a deletion reason. Copyright status... hrm. It is from an external entity, so not technically PD-USGov, but they must have knowingly allowed it to be posted with a no-copyright statement. That does sometimes happen with some of the military sites and submitted images; this may amount to PD-author. The ntent seems fairly clear, and I'm not sure it amounts to a significant doubt. Carl Lindberg (talk) 06:35, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Clindberg: Abandoning rights to a work (making it PD) requires an overt act by the owner... I don't think a third-party statement is evidence of that. The description on Flickr as 'US Government Work' is apparently in error, so I don't think we can infer much from it. Reventtalk 22:28, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- The precautionary principle suggests that we cannot assume that UPS was aware of the licensing. It wouldn't be the first time, and won't be the last time, that a federal agency posted a picture that didn't belong to them without consideration for the actual source. — Huntster (t @ c) 21:37, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
- I say delete it, since it doesn't seem to be a US government work, and PD-author is possible but not directly documented. There are plenty of other photos of Geithner, and it's not obvious that there's a special need for one with a UPS logo in it. --ghouston (talk) 00:18, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP as above. --INeverCry 00:51, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://cdne.diariocorreo.pe/thumbs/uploads/articles/images/antartida-expertos-del-senhami-jpg_604x0.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PLATO PLATONI (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical paintings and drawings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
They are correctly stated the authors, date, and country correctly.
- File:Elisabetta Farnese Palazzo Boveri.jpg
- File:CASTELLODIFONTANELLATO1891.jpg
- File:CASTELLODIFONTANELLATOposterior1891.jpg
- File:Ilustre tierra de Fontanellato.jpg
- File:Plato Platoni.jpg
- File:Uberto II Pallavicino.jpg
- File:Schede Sidolo.jpg
- File:Uberto Pallavicino.jpg
- File:1848-49.-Castello di Gusaliggio Pittore ALBERTO PASINI.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PLATO PLATONI (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos with different quality and cameras, very probably not own work. Several are authored by "STAZIONE 2" and the EXIF indicates a Facebook origin (e.g. File:Sidolo casa medieval agosto 2016.jpg). Other are low res images without credible source (e.g. File:Uberto Pallavicini.jpg or File:Rocca di Gusaliggio.jpg – the latter could by PD-Italy, if the correct source and date were added). Finally, there are collages without the source indicated (e.g. File:Palacio Rota Pisaroni Plasencia (Piacenza) Italia.jpg). A clarification is needed (or a mass deletion).
- File:AffrescateIl Palazzo Della Corgna.jpg
- File:Palacio Riesco.jpg
- File:El Palacio Riesco.jpg
- File:Franceschino da Ghisone.jpg
- File:Cuerpo del Santo Tomás de Cori.jpg
- File:Interno Chiesa San Michel Felizzano.jpg
- File:Torre Campanaria della Parrocchiale di San Michele. Felizzano.jpg
- File:Chiesa San Michele Felizzano.jpg
- File:Paolo Ercole.jpg
- File:Montarsiccio Bedonia.jpg
- File:Montarsiccio.jpg
- File:Sidolo julio 2016.jpg
- File:Sidolo casa medieval.jpg
- File:Sidolo Iglesia 3 julio 2016.jpg
- File:Sidolo casa medieval agosto 2016.jpg
- File:Castello di Hena.jpg
- File:Chiesa Valdena.jpg
- File:Valdena Borgotaro Parma.jpg
- File:Valdena Parma.jpg
- File:Valdena Borgo Val di Taro.jpg
- File:Belforte Parma .jpg
- File:Belforte Borgo Val di taro.jpg
- File:Escudo de Armas Familia Platoni.jpg
- File:Via dei Platoni.jpg
- File:Interior iglesia San Miguel Arcangel de Sparvo en Castiglione dei Pepoli.jpg
- File:Igliesia de San Miguel Arcangel de Sparvo en Castiglione dei Pepoli.jpg
- File:Chiesa San Cristoforo Borgotaro Conti Platoni.jpg
- File:Chiesa San Cristoforo Borgotaro.jpg
- File:Medievale Catello Borgo Val di Taro.jpg
- File:Castello Borgo Val di Taro.jpg
- File:Rocca di Gusaliggio10.jpg
- File:Chiesa di San Michele Arcangelo Gravago.jpg
- File:Castello Gravago.jpg
- File:Gravago Chiesa dei Santi Vito e Modesto Altar.jpg
- File:Gravago Chiesa dei Santi Vito e Modesto Interno.jpg
- File:Chiesa dei Santi Vito Modesto e Crescenzio Gravago.jpg
- File:Iglesia Caffaraccia.jpg
- File:Caffaraccia Montes.jpg
- File:Sidolo Altar de la Iglesia de San Ambrosio.jpg
- File:Sidolo Interior de la Iglesia de San Ambrosio.jpg
- File:Corpus Santonni Martyris llevado por Giulio Platoni.jpg
- File:Porcigatone Interior Iglesia San Pedro.jpg
- File:Porcigatone Invierno.jpg
- File:Porcigatone Altar Iglesia San Pedro.jpg
- File:Caffaraccia Primera y Segunda Guerra Mundial.jpg
- File:Caffaraccia Chiesa San Rocco.jpg
- File:Palacio Rota Pisaroni Plasencia (Piacenza) Italia.jpg
- File:Escudo Farnesio en Palazzo Boveri Borgotaro.jpg
- File:Escudo Comuna Borgatoro en Palazzo Boveri.jpg
- File:Escudo de Armas Duque Alejandro Farnesio Palazzo Boveri.jpg
- File:Iglesia de Sidolo.jpg
- File:Oberto Pallavicino.jpg
- File:Chiesa Sidolo.jpg
- File:Castillo Platoni de Gravago.jpg
- File:Uberto Pallavicini.jpg
- File:Rocca di Gusaliggio Rovine Valmozzola.jpg
- File:Rocca di Gusaliggio Mormorola.JPG
- File:Rocca di Gusaliggio Rovine.jpeg
- File:Rocca di Gusaliggio Valmozzola Castello.JPG
- File:Rocca di Gusaliggio Valmozzola.JPG
- File:1848-49.-Castello di Gusaliggio Pittore ALBERTO PASINI.jpg
- File:Pieve Gusaliggio.jpeg
- File:Rocca di Gusaliggio.jpg
- File:Techo Palazzo Platoni Farnese.jpg
- File:STEMMA PALAZZO PLATONI FARNESE.jpg
- File:Palazzo Platoni Farnese.jpg
- File:Palazzo Platoni Farnese2.jpg
- File:Palazzo Platoni Farnese1.jpg
- File:Jardines Palazzo Platoni.jpg
- File:Castello de Gravago 1.JPG
- File:Castillo de Gravago.jpg
- File:Lavatoio (Monastero di Gravago).jpg
Ruthven (msg) 16:37, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:36, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal or promotional photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
no file Sgsg (talk) 15:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo for a racing team, per http://tfsport.co.uk/ No sign that the uploader has any copyright claim over the logo. The359 (talk) 15:28, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Copyvio: not own work and original artist only died in 2008. Uploader will need to proof that they are own the copyright, see COM:OTRS. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Text-only image of very limited usefulness, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:38, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- It may not look interesting, but it's a scan of an original historical document in the US National Archives. I'm not sure why "text-only" is relevant here, since most images transcribed on Wikisource from Wikimedia Commons are also textual. Dominic (talk) 15:44, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Part of a cooperation project; it accompanied photos of the building of the Berlin Wall. It was interesting enough for NARA to scan it and make it public; I think it's in scope for us too as a source document. Carl Lindberg (talk) 20:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Carl. --INeverCry 00:53, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Text-only image of very limited usefulness, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:39, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Part of a cooperation project; it accompanied photos of the building of the Berlin Wall, and has some handwritten notes which could be of interest. It was interesting enough for NARA to scan it and make it public; I think it's in scope for us too as a source document. Carl Lindberg (talk) 20:05, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Carl. --INeverCry 00:53, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 15:58, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 15:59, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 15:59, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ChamberlainSpencer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work – low resolution, poor quality, no EXIF data. I have alredy nominated 7 of his files for speedy deletion as I have found direct proofs that they are copyvio.
- File:MickdeBrenniMP.jpg
- File:GraceGraceMP.jpg
- File:LeanneDonaldson.jpg
- File:PaulAntonio1.jpg
- File:ShannonFentiman1.jpg
- File:CoraleeOrourke1.jpg
- File:StevenMiles1.jpg
- File:MarkBailey1.jpg
- File:YvetteDath1.jpg
- File:Jo-AnnMiller1.jpg
- File:AnthonyLynham1.jpg
- File:KateJones1.jpg
- File:CameronDick1.jpg
- File:CurtisPitt1.jpg
- File:KerryShine1.jpg
- File:LeeanneEnoch1.jpg
- File:DanielAndrews1.jpg
- File:PeterWellington1.jpg
- File:AnnastaciaPalaszczuk1.jpg
jdx Re: 16:06, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Older, larger, sharper, clearer at source... here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Darwinc1999 (talk · contribs)
[edit]A series of images of stadiums and arenas, but small (all less than 700x700), low quality, small file size images, all claimed as own work, but obviously not. Different sizes, white balance, style, aerial photographs, etc make it highly unlikely that any of these images is the own work of the uploader and more likely taken from the internet.
- File:Estadio cementos progreso de guatemala.jpg
- File:Poliedro de caracas.jpg
- File:Forum de valencia, Venezuela.jpg
- File:Western Complex.jpg
- File:Imagine cave.jpg
- File:Ice-Palace-Studios.jpg
- File:Prudential Center, New Jersey.jpg
- File:House Of Blues, Boston.jpg
- File:Centro Expositor de Puebla, Mexico.jpg
- File:Universal mardi grass.jpg
- File:Tommy wind theater.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:49, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this logo with a drawing on it. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:52, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 16:57, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 16:58, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
blurry, bad quality Екатерина Борисова (talk) 16:58, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Watermarked with two different credits, neither of which matches uploader. DMacks (talk) 17:01, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Obviously not user's own work, photographer is reflected in glass on top of this old photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:07, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Possible mistaken upload, same image exists as File:Illustration des fruits en pays Bassa.jpg. Notice the scanning artefact in the one nominated. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:12, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- J'ai demandé de supprimer cette image qui est en double et qui a des imperfections. Une version parfaite de cette image a aussi téléversée et est en ligne.Elns (talk) 17:31, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- La catégorie avait été enlevée par quelqu'un d'autre, parce que vous aviez ajouté la catégorie duplicate plutôt que le modèle duplicate. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:47, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- J'ai demandé de supprimer cette image qui est en double et qui a des imperfections. Une version parfaite de cette image a aussi téléversée et est en ligne.Elns (talk) 17:31, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Duplicate. And per uploader's request. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:47, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Low quality dog photo C messier (talk) 17:53, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely authorship claims. Looks like a photo of a screen showing a presumably non-free video. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Могила Миколи Хвильового.jpg Holopoman (talk) 18:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Могила Миколи Хвильового.jpg Holopoman (talk) 18:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Могила Миколи Хвильового.jpg Holopoman (talk) 18:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Могила Миколи Хвильового.jpg Holopoman (talk) 18:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
No FoP Ukraine Holopoman (talk) 18:18, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation MikaelF (talk) 18:18, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation MikaelF (talk) 18:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Copyright owner? Probably copyright violation. MikaelF (talk) 18:24, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Poor quality, unknown person, shows nothing but this person Staszek Lem (talk) 18:37, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Brunohbrum (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own works, almost small size with no EXIFS, all other uploads speedy deleted for obvious copyvios at this time
- File:Deck Village 3.jpg
- File:Deck Village 4.png
- File:Cinema Village 2.png
- File:Evento Village 4.png
- File:Deck Village 2.png
- File:Evento Village 3.png
- File:Evento Village 2.png
- File:Eventos Village.png
- File:Cinema Village.png
- File:Deck Village.png
Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:05, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Brunohbrum (talk · contribs)
[edit]No confidence that uploader created either of these images both pertaining to a shopping mall... Other uploads were obvious copyvios, but these have no metadata and no indication of user's own work.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:24, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
this is not a good work KSRazu (talk) 19:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
This is not a good work KSRazu (talk) 19:20, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
no source given for this photomontage Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Not "own work", too small and little bit bigest can be found in this article: http://kh-davron.uz/kutubxona/uzbek/botirxon-valixojayev-bozorboy-orinboyev-bobo-xudododi-vali-vali-bobo-gazallari.html (scroll down) Cap1000 (talk) 19:44, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Experimental language = font without (c)? If (c), failed license review. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:51, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
"Bad Flickr Source"... as stated on the list, the source states restrictions in their profile that are incompatible with the stated license.
This is also not a US Air Force photo. Resolute Support is a NATO (not US military) activity, the photo is not attributed by them to the USAF, and it is not found by Google on any US military server.
Given the blacklisting of the source, but 'supposedly' a compatible license, I think this needs discussion. Reventtalk 20:10, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
A screenshot from this video: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2c43a1_entretien-avec-nathalie-treil_sport, the screenshot is viewable at http://s1.dmcdn.net/IS9t4.jpg Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 20:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Unused low quality personal photo, not useful for illustrating albinism, no other potential educational uses; out of scope Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 20:41, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Marina kravec foto biografia lichnaya zhizn muzh pesni i klipy uchastnici kvn i comedy woman.jpg
[edit]Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, фото находится в Интернете до загрузки на Викисклад: http://www.cosmo.ru/stars/krupnim-planom/novaya-zvezda-marina-kravec/, http://likeness.ru/blog/tag/камеди+клаб+comedy+club/, http://my-muzh.ru/muzh-mariny-kravets/ Dogad75 (talk) 20:55, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Collage made from unknown source files. Possible copyright violation. C messier (talk) 21:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Collage made from unknown source files. Possible copyright violation. C messier (talk) 21:17, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Nvidia logos
[edit]- File:Paranvidia.jpg
- File:NVidia Logo.jpg
- File:NVidia new Logo 2006 horiz.svg
- File:Nvidia Logo.svg
- File:NVidia-Logo.svg
- File:NVidia Riva TNT chip.jpg
- File:NVidia Riva TNT 2chip.JPG
I think that the Nvidia logos are original enough to pass the threshold. The first two files were uploaded under the false licenses (as the own work of the uploader). The files 3-5 were transferred to Commons by the bot yesterday. In the last two pictures the logos are not the only objects, but it's clearly not DM cases. --INS Pirat (talk) 17:10, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Nope. The nVidia logo seems too simple for me (and several users may agree), therefore, bellow the TOO in the U.S. (more complex logos has been already nominated and kept). Also, self-made SVGs may be considered as Own work (by the nature of the vector graphics, specially the hand-made ones with text-editor only). --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:17, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Lack of indication, that the works are derivative, and of the license tags specifying why the original work is eligible for Commons, is a copyright violation (for the one of those two files it was fixed later). That's not the point of my nomination, though, but just a way to show, that the logo wasn't uploaded responsibly, with awareness of the relevant rules. --INS Pirat (talk) 02:21, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- That is just your opinion about the TOO in the United States. If two or more users agree that the nVidia logo is bellow the TOO (therefore, no copyvio) in the U.S., then, who is worng here?
- And, in the case of the SVGs, the copyright status is more complex, since two elements have separated copyright statuses: The Graphic and the Code (yes, the SVG code is copyrightable by itself); since SVGs can be created totally by hand using a text editor, this is enough reason to consider them Own work. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:17, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep NVIDIA logos' complexity is comparable to File:Subway restaurant.svg and File:New Orleans Saints.svg, which are showcased in TOO. — Le Loy (talk) 22:29, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- The logo of the New Orleans Saints is not so trivial by itself, but it's ineligible for copyright since the fleur-de-lis symbol is widely known and the logo doesn't add to its basic image any significant elements. The closer case, in my opinion, is that of the Best Western Hotels but I think that the NVidia logo is more complex being asymmetrical and employing curves instead of lines. Also the Copyright Office decisions could be total opposite one to another - for example, I don't understand how is old Car Credit City logo more copyrightable than the logo of Best Western. Also there is the fact that around the 20 Wikipedia sites now have NVidia logos uploaded there over the years as the non-free content. I don't think that we should imply that those uploaders were just unaware of the TOO principle. --INS Pirat (talk) 02:21, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- The first file Paranvidia.jpg ( Delete) seems to me a little bit to complex because of the background colour gradient. In my opinion all other files are below COM:TOO, in relation to a logo of a US based company ( Keep). This opinion was the reason why I transfered files 3-5 via wdwdbot to commons.--Wdwd (talk) 18:08, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Wdwd: I don't, personally, think the color gradient really matters... it's a completely smooth gradient, such as would be created by a preset... I don't think it involves any protectable degree of human originality. Reventtalk 01:03, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- The test for the United States is whether it's significantly more complex than File:Best Western logo.svg... -- AnonMoos (talk) 08:25, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Delete The symbol used for the Nvidia logo is IMO almost certainly copyrightable, as it is a 'unique work' of graphic design.... it is not textual, does not appear to be based on any kind of 'prior art', and is not obvious... it is original. The Subway logo is not copyrightable because it is merely stylized text, and the Saints logo is not copyrightable because is is just a minor variation on a design (a fleur-de-lis) that has existed for hundreds of years.
- There is a PDF on Commons, linked from the file page of the Best Western logo, where the USCO discusses exactly why it fails to be copyrightable... it consists of 'names, lettering, common typographic ornamentation, and minor variations on common geometrical shapes'. None of this applies to the Nvidia 'symbol'. I suspect a deciding factor in the Best Western case is that the overall shape of the logo is quite recognizably (and was claimed to be) the outline of a house, and the other 'non typographic' element is just a diamond... neither is original, clearly, and a claim could only be based on the arrangement of those elements, which was not found to be creative.
- In the CCC case, the version that was actually registered pretty obviously 'just barely' scraped over the line of minimal creativity. The line is somewhere between it and "Best Western", but I don't think it's particularly relevant to the Nvidia logo, since there is no question of 'arrangement of elements' contributing to it being copyrightable or not... it's simply if the 'symbol' is sufficiently original, and I think it clearly is.
- I think that having to describe a work of graphic design as a 'symbol', or a 'thing', or other such nondescriptive terms is a fair indication that it's probably original. Reventtalk 00:44, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: the logo can not exactly be described by "simple geometric shapes " with a few words (e.g. two triangles and one circle), thererfore, and as it is also more than a simple text, it is copyrightable. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:48, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Funeral of Bülent Ecevit
[edit]Files are all sourced to the Flickr account of Amir Farshad Ebrahimi (https://www.flickr.com/photos/farshadebrahimi/), who was blacklisted way back in 2009 (these are recent uploads, but of an event that occurred in 11-2006) for Flickrwashing of images that belonged to stock photo libraries, related to the Gaza conflict. I don't feel confident simply deleting, or approving, these, for the following reasons:
- I am unable to find any them in the Getty Images library of the event.
- I am unable to find any of them anywhere elsewhere on the internet, with either Google or TinEye.
- Per the EXIF, they were all taken with an identical camera.
- The event occurred in Ankara, Turkey, which is the claimed home of the owner of the Flickr account.
- Searching the SHA1 hashes of these files does not indicate that they were ever uploaded to Commons.
- The Flickr photostream of source includes 'likely' stolen images, outside of this set.
I can, honestly, see either keeping these on the basis on a lack of evidence of copyvio, or nuking them on PRP grounds, but I'm unable to find 'any' evidence that these specific files are problematic, other than the blacklisting. I really think these need some more eyes. Thanks
- File:Bülent Ecevit 1.jpg
- File:Bülent Ecevit 10.jpg
- File:Bülent Ecevit 11.jpg
- File:Bülent Ecevit 13.jpg
- File:Bülent Ecevit 14.jpg
- File:Bülent Ecevit 15.jpg
- File:Bülent Ecevit 16.jpg
- File:Bülent Ecevit 17.jpg
- File:Bülent Ecevit 3.jpg
- File:Bülent Ecevit 4.jpg
- File:Bülent Ecevit 5.jpg
- File:Bülent Ecevit 6.jpg
- File:Bülent Ecevit 7.jpg
- File:Bülent Ecevit 8.jpg
- File:Bülent Ecevit 9.jpg
- File:Denktaş at funeral of Ecevit.jpg
Reventtalk 21:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Comment I agree with @Revent that the situation isn't exactly clear-cut, but having studied the Flickr stream of the supposed author, and having noticed a lot of copyright violations in there (which is the reason why the author has been blacklisted in the first place), I would lean towards deleting all 16 files on PRP grounds. If the uploader/author can confirm their authorship and release of the pictures under a free licence via OTRS, then that should clear all doubts about their copyright status. odder (talk) 22:31, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per Odder/COM:PRP. --INeverCry 01:01, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
As the original photo (en:File:Original Doge meme.jpg) is copyrighted, this, as a derivative work, still falls under the same copyright. — fourthords | =Λ= | 23:48, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by GRS73 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: By Disney. Bellow the COM:TOO? Amitie 10g (talk) 02:52, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: bellow TOO in USA, not enough original (textual or design). Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:11, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
I honestly don't know whether or not this is acceptable on Commons. This is a screenshot of one of the leaked DNC emails posted on Wikileaks. I want to say that this is a private email and should not be hosted on Commons even if it is not in the public sphere. I also am not sure regarding copyright. Screenshots of things online do not automatically default to {{Own}}. Asking for community input on this. Majora (talk) 01:46, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Alright--JJBers (talk) 01:49, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, even if it was not a copyvio (which it clearly is). Files that contain nothing but raw text are not in scope on Commons. Reventtalk 01:51, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- But, the fileis currently in use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 06:49, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Amitie 10g: A copyvio doesn't become 'not a copyvio' just because it's in use. It should have never been transferred, because it's a blatant copyvio... it's claimed to be a document written by a private individual (who of course owns the copyright in it) who never published it, much less released it under a free license. The text is only even 'plausibly' usable under fair use, which doesn't work here. That the uploader claimed the 'screenshot' as own work is not only wrong, but a common false claim.
- I was not saying 'not in scope as purely text' was the reason to delete it, I was saying that it's also not in scope. Reventtalk 12:57, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- But, the fileis currently in use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 06:49, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete We should not be encouraging or validating Russian intelligence operations by hosting such materials on Wikimedia Commons, a non-profit headquartered in the land of freedom and all that is good -- the US of A. File:Fuck the EU.oga, on the other hand,
Gijón16 (talk) 14:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC) - Move to the Wikipedias that use the page and tag it with the appropriate rationale. I also suggest the above vote by Gijón16 is disregarded by the closing admin. Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:11, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_जांतको_झलक.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Italia.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_%E0%A4%9C%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%82%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%8B_%E0%A4%9D%E0%A4%B2%E0%A4%95.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E0%A4%9C%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%82%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%8B_%E0%A4%9D%E0%A4%B2%E0%A4%95.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, copyright violation. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Image published in 1926, claimed to be "public domain because of age", author is "unknown". Should be deleted per the precautionary principle, because the author of a 1926 image could well have lived beyond 1945, which would mean the image is still protected by copyright. Rosenzweig τ 17:38, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: If the author is actually anonymous/unknown, then, PMA does not apply (why you thing that {{Anonymous-EU}} exists?). --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, if the author is actually anonymous. But is he? The uploader apparently doesn't know who he is, and it seems the source where the image was taken from does not mention him either. So it's safe to say we do not know who he is. But does that make him "anonymous"? Isn't he probably mentioned elsewhere? --Rosenzweig τ 07:48, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: I've fixed the template. There is a whole discussion about anonymity of such works here; the photograph in question was published in the journal without author disclosure (and it was common practice those days), I wasn't able to find it published anywhere else, I believe it's anonymous then. Best wishes, Filip em (talk) 06:31, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, reclicensed as anonymous European. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:57, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Design of a weapon in Warhammer 40,000. Legality in question. Feldo (talk) 18:35, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: The only valid reason for deletion in this case is Copyvio, and I don't see it (and file uploaded in 2006 and in use). --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:02, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:04, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Design of a weapon in Warhammer 40,000. Legality in question. Feldo (talk) 18:35, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: The only valid reason for deletion in this case is Copyvio, and I don't see it (and file uploaded in 2006 and in use). --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:02, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:05, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Design of a weapon in Warhammer 40,000. Legality in question. Feldo (talk) 18:35, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: The only valid reason for deletion in this case is Copyvio, and I don't see it (and file uploaded in 2006 and in use). --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:01, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:05, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Design of a weapon in Warhammer 40,000. Legality in question. Feldo (talk) 18:36, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: The only valid reason for deletion in this case is Copyvio, and I don't see it (and file uploaded in 2006 and in use). --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:01, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:05, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
