Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/07/24

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 24th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please verify that no copyright infringements have occured. Many of the images in this compilation have been used on various other website (see e.g. [1] or [2] or [3] or [4] or [5]). Also note the link at in the "source=" of the section "Summary" of the upload appears to be a mere advertisement link. I checked that source, on 23 July, and could not find the pictures which are included in the upload. Thus: please add more information as to how all of the images in this picture were legitimally re-used? Please similarly verify that no copyright infringements have occurred in https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Playas_de_Costa_Rica_collage.jpg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:San_Jose_Ladys_Night.jpg (other images which the user has uploaded to a Wikimedia project). I have also not found the included pictures in the link (of which I thus become suspicious) which is included in the "source=" of the uploads' "Summary". Uploads at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:A_-Galeria.jpg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:A_-Galeria_-_copia.jpg almost specify the right "source=" (by adding a trail of /galeria/ to the cited URL), but this does not prove that no copyrights have been infringed with these uploads. (Vincent Mia Edie Verheyen (talk) 06:04, 24 July 2016 (UTC))[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 06:54, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear if the uploader has received the rights from the photographer to upload the image used on the magazine cover under its present Commons license. Takeaway (talk) 09:52, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 17:24, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission Dogad75 (talk) 17:30, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:52, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission, в левом нижнем углу стоит знак копирайта e.shevchenko Dogad75 (talk) 17:32, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:52, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission Dogad75 (talk) 17:33, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:52, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission Dogad75 (talk) 17:34, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:52, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission Dogad75 (talk) 17:35, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:52, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission Dogad75 (talk) 17:35, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:52, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a copyrighted image that I neglected to say is copyrighted. Please remove so that I may upload with the proper rights. ErikBloomquist (talk) 16:33, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 19:35, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 05:25, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Matanya: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sam, Wellington, 3 July 2010 - Flickr - PhillipC.jpg: Out of scope - unused personal image

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a copyrighted image that I neglected to say is copyrighted. Please remove so that I may upload with the proper rights. ErikBloomquist (talk) 16:32, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by INeverCry: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used for promotion. No educational value. MetaKnight93 (talk) 21:41, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: spam. --INeverCry 00:46, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional image. MetaKnight93 (talk) 21:50, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: spam. --INeverCry 00:46, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not from the US federal government and has the wrong license. It comes from a private website and does not have the attribution, attribution-sharealike or public domain dedication license which Commons accepts. The flickr license is Public Domain mark which means the private copyright owner can change the license at any moment without consequences. He/She does not release any rights with this license. Leoboudv (talk) 23:58, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not from the US federal government and has the wrong license. It comes from a private website and does not have the attribution, attribution-sharealike or public domain dedication license which Commons accepts. The flickr license is Public Domain mark which means the private copyright owner can change the license at any moment without consequences. He/She does not release any rights with this license. Leoboudv (talk) 23:59, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image. It was probably obtained from here Wikicology (talk) 22:31, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 02:37, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque no lo hice completo Sofía Herazo Castillo (talk) 22:49, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:36, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems directly taken from https://andreagonzalezvillablancaperiodista.wordpress.com/category/andrea-gonzalez-villablanca/ , 21st May 2012. Date in Commons is 25th July 2016, what is obviously wrong. Also, there the file is not published under the free license CC-BY-SA-4.0. Mario-WL (talk) 23:25, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 02:43, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mobile game logo. OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 07:13, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer: Copyright violation:

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 07:14, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer: Copyright violation:

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar concerns as raised in the Reason for the nomination of San_Jose_Night_Hot_Escort.jpg (revision). Compare also with the corresponding deletion requests page of that cited analogue image. Vincent Mia Edie Verheyen (talk) 05:35, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 17:04, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar concerns as raised in the Reason for the nomination of San_Jose_Night_Hot_Escort.jpg (revision). Compare also with the corresponding deletion requests page of that cited analogue image. Vincent Mia Edie Verheyen (talk) 06:05, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 17:05, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar concerns as raised in the Reason for the nomination of San_Jose_Night_Hot_Escort.jpg (revision). Compare also with the corresponding deletion requests page of that cited analogue image. Vincent Mia Edie Verheyen (talk) 06:06, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 17:05, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar concerns as raised in the Reason for the nomination of San_Jose_Night_Hot_Escort.jpg (revision). Compare also with the corresponding deletion requests page of that cited analogue image. Vincent Mia Edie Verheyen (talk) 06:07, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 17:05, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded by OLOUMOLLE (talk · contributions · Statistics) on 18.07.2016, the photo is circulating on web (even actually not in that size) since 2015 via https://www.flickr.com/photos/indiesigh_ph/17604302268/ (2015, © All rights reserved by "Indiesigh Ph"). Indiesigh_ph ("Isabella Indiesigh") is photographer based in Turin, Italy.

My no-permission tag was reverted by uploader. Further details and/or permission needed.

PS: The user uploaded on same day also File:Daniel Buess MIR1.jpg, also taken form above Flickr stream (but the file remained untouched by user). Gunnex (talk) 06:50, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As per ticket:2016072410000377. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:27, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vdhillon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Family / private pictures. Out of scope. Use on enwiki out of scope, e.g. granddad and grandson have nothing to do with the city of Hisar.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 13:43, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:16, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vdhillon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader and socks (User:Thecutehero, User:Lezela) have been blocked on en.wiki for peristent copyvios. Some of these images are likely web grabs while others are personal photos of the uploader (his son) that he had spammed across in articles at en.wiki. Delete on COM:PRP or for serving no educational purpose.

SpacemanSpiff 00:08, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lezela (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader and socks (User:Thecutehero, User:Vdhillon) have been blocked on en.wiki for peristent copyvios.These are personal photos of the uploader (his son) that he had spammed across in articles at en.wiki. Delete on COM:PRP and for serving no educational purpose.

SpacemanSpiff 00:13, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thecutehero (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images culled from the internet but uploaded as "own work" to Wikimedia Commons. Possible copyright violations.

Takeaway (talk) 15:56, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all Easy to find many of these on a simple Google Image search. Blatant copyvios.--NortyNort (talk) 11:43, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:32, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thecutehero (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader and socks (User:Vdhillon, User:Lezela) have been blocked on en.wiki for peristent copyvios. Some of these images are likely web grabs while others are personal photos of the uploader (his son) that he had spammed across in articles at en.wiki. Delete on COM:PRP or for serving no educational purpose. Many uploads from the sockfarm have already been deleted for similar reasons.

SpacemanSpiff 00:15, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pics of oscar statuettes have been deleted in past, so this might be unsuitable too Queryzo (talk) 00:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

By uploader KCVelaga(CotRoIN) Talk 01:25, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's request KCVelaga(CotRoIN) Talk 01:27, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Up-loader's request KCVelaga(CotRoIN) Talk 01:27, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's request KCVelaga(CotRoIN) Talk 01:28, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's request KCVelaga(CotRoIN) Talk 01:29, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's request KCVelaga(CotRoIN) Talk 01:29, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's request KCVelaga(CotRoIN) Talk 01:29, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's request KCVelaga(CotRoIN) Talk 01:29, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Template talk:PD-Chile. The relevant terms to qualify for Public Domain in Chile are either 70 years past the death of the author or after first publication, or the author died before 1962/1954. Neither can be the case for this image from 1970. De728631 (talk) 01:39, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominated:


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a screenshot from a non-free video game. De728631 (talk) 01:51, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, freedom of panorama in Japan does not cover text and artistic works like the maps and photographs on this sign. So we cannot host derivative photos. De728631 (talk) 02:02, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license, the uploader isn't the holder of the copyright. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 02:48, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused. Replaced by any of the maps at Category:Maps of Braničevo District. Zoupan (talk) 02:56, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It looks like a cropped version of a 2013 Flickr image with a different author and an "All rights reserved" tag [6]. Also found it here, but with no attribution [7]. Unlikely to be own work. Dontreader (talk) 03:26, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I appreciate the fact that the uploader seems to be honest, not trying to deceive anyone, but this image cannot be kept unless the uploader shows that the copyright owner of the image gives permission to release the image under a free license. See COM:OTRS. I should have used a missing permission tag, but I'm feeling lazy tonight. Dontreader (talk) 03:37, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Message to the uploader: sorry, but please read Commons:Screenshots. At the bottom of that website it says, "Copyright © 2014-2016 PriceBlaze.pk. All Rights Reserved." Therefore, this screenshot is protected by copyright. But obviously your intentions were good. Sorry again. Dontreader (talk) 04:02, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abidfarooque (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

--ghouston (talk) 04:04, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, Commons is not a personal photo album. Poké95 05:09, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Coz I wana have sex with Boris 94.197.120.71 05:10, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:09, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal images

--ghouston (talk) 05:32, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a self-made logo. Out of scope I think. --ghouston (talk) 05:33, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not from the US federal government and has the wrong license. It comes from a private website and does not have the attribution, attribution-sharealike or public domain dedication license which Commons accepts. The flickr license is Public Domain mark which means the private copyright owner can change the license at any moment without consequences. He/She does not release any rights with this license. Leoboudv (talk) 06:11, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not from the US federal government and has the wrong license. It comes from a private website and does not have the attribution, attribution-sharealike or public domain dedication license which Commons accepts. The flickr license is Public Domain mark which means the private copyright owner can change the license at any moment without consequences. He/She does not release any rights with this license. Leoboudv (talk) 06:12, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not from the US federal government and has the wrong license. It comes from a private website and does not have the attribution, attribution-sharealike or public domain dedication license which Commons accepts. The flickr license is Public Domain mark which means the private copyright owner can change the license at any moment without consequences. He/She does not release any rights with this license. This flickr account also has few images on its photostream. Leoboudv (talk) 06:15, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not from the US federal government and has the wrong license. It comes from a private website and does not have the attribution, attribution-sharealike or public domain dedication license which Commons accepts. The flickr license is Public Domain mark which means the private copyright owner can change the license at any moment without consequences. He/She does not release any rights with this license. This flickr account also has few images on its photostream. Leoboudv (talk) 06:15, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not from the US federal government and has the wrong license. It comes from a private website and does not have the attribution, attribution-sharealike or public domain dedication license which Commons accepts. The flickr license is Public Domain mark which means the private copyright owner can change the license at any moment without consequences. He/She does not release any rights with this license. This flickr account also has few images on its photostream. Leoboudv (talk) 06:16, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. This image has been all over the Internet so for us to accept this site's license we'd have to have confirmation that the image is theirs. And since the image is low res and web-sized, I doubt it. czar 06:18, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: Ehsan Rajabi is a known war photographer (see this). The photo is his as his personal web site says. Such a professional photographer won't do something that tarnishes his status. The image is all over the internet because he himself had published it before with no address. Mhhossein (talk) 08:04, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Where does the website say this? It's not loading for me czar 08:11, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
ِDo you mean that the Photographer has to declare that the photo is his, even in his personal website? I can see the photo among his other photos! --Mhhossein (talk) 12:19, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No, I meant that the page wasn't loading. It's up now. The website looks rather messy for a personal portfolio. If we have confirmation that the website is actually his then the cc-by-4.0 permission would be fine but it would be nice to have confirmation since portfolio sites tend to use higher res and non-pixelated images... Also can you read what the black and red borders say around some of the images? czar 17:52, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to me that most of the images are not the original files by the photographer and some of them are those already published by photographer via other websites and hence have some writings in borders. I think the website is established by order of the photographer but they are in a primary phase. Anyway, those writings are date and place of the death along with some rather literary notes. I don't know if I can get access to Rajabi and ask him to send an email to the OTRS team or upload original files as soon as possible. --Mhhossein (talk) 05:38, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination/COM:PRP. --INeverCry 00:11, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

當初上傳之理由已不符合現在情況,此圖片留著也沒有用處,且不會應用於任何條目之中,請求予以刪除 S099001 (talk) 06:52, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 07:03, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:Scope: poor quality unused selfie. MKFI (talk) 07:04, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover. Copyright status of the photograph uncertain. MKFI (talk) 07:05, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Derived from (example) https://www.instagram.com/p/5dxLVOxie1/ (2015, © by "gnash"). Gunnex (talk) 20:23, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster. No proof of CC0 license. MKFI (talk) 07:08, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo, OTRS permission needed. Too complex for {{PD-textlogo}}. MKFI (talk) 07:11, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mobile game logo. OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 07:13, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe okay in Ukraine but not free in the United States. Ideally import back to ukwp but otherwise ineligible for Commons. en:Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2016_June_11#File:Zirka-2012.png czar 07:18, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For the quality and the moment: not own work. And the uploader its a new user with two copyvios (photos of football) 186.135.138.81 07:19, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo de http://www.helioparc.fr/, non libre Habertix (talk) 07:24, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[Youtube channel spam] Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. If IN scope needs permission (video screenshot) via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xKADsVQpqE (04.2016, © by "Mr Flamingo & Cie") Gunnex (talk) 07:30, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image issue probablement de ce site et probablement pas sous la licence indiquée. Bounè rodzo (talk) 07:35, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RheinMain CongressCenter (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded on 15.07.2016 by RheinMain CongressCenter (talk · contributions · Statistics) these architectual sketches of de:Rhein-Main-Hallen (ongoing reconstruction) are works by "N.O.ME Medienproduktion GmbH" commissioned by "Rhein-Main-Hallen GmbH", considering also https://www.fiylo.de/location-frankfurt/rheinmain-congresscenter/ and (e.g.) File:Foyer Halle 1 d ©Rhein-Main-Hallen GmbH.jpg versus https://www.fiylo.de/media/csm-rheinmaincongresscenter-events-02-ddab5b040b-22217d.jpg (last modified: 05.2016).

Despite of having a similar username, "Rhein-Main-Hallen GmbH" is not necessarily the same person as the Commons user. A verifiable connection via COM:OTRS (or by other means) must be established.

Gunnex (talk) 07:48, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Andreamalin as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: no quiero que se muestre la imagen


Kept: In use. INeverCry 00:32, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[Re-nomination] Unclear copyright status, per above DR, considering uploaded in 2012 but already circualting since 2010 via (example) http://junioreurosong.net/the-singers/croatia/lorena-jelusic.html (2010, Copyright junioreurosong.net 2008-2014) = http://i46.tinypic.com/29m6azo.jpg (last modified: 2010, identical exif), needing permission. Gunnex (talk) 07:59, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Councilman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seemingly copyrighted images taken from http://www.unifor4000.com/14feb14012unifor-family-ed-program.html and http://www.unifor4000.com/13nov01_008council4000-2013convention.html © 2016 - Unifor National Council 4000

Ies (talk) 08:06, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not clear if the uploader is allowed to share this file, permission via OTRS is needed. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 08:27, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lucinkapes~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (375x463 + 300x450) resolutions, missing EXIF, considering also File:Kseniya.jpg and logs = 1st version sourced with "Personal gallery of Kseniya Sitnik (...) " deleted and 2nd version (if not identical) taken from (example) http://sandros.livejournal.com/1239096.html (07.06.2009) = http://www.ljplus.ru/img4/k/a/kartinki_niki/4481b.jpg (last modified: 07.06.2009)

Gunnex (talk) 08:30, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Carelessfully, same meaning catefory is already existed.Duplicated category is Category:Koshoji_Betsuin(Tondabayashi)--Kochizufan (talk) 08:22, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bhabilalgautam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 08:31, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Bhabilalgautam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image

Rssäl 19:29, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Kevin Foo (Foo Zhen Ning) (talk) 13:27, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: DR isn't motivated Natuur12 (talk) 19:13, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image opposing to someone else's belongings Kevin Foo (Foo Zhen Ning) (talk) 08:37, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:17, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 08:47, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 08:47, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 08:52, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Deablith (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploaded in a row on 24.12.2015 for es:Carabineros de Chile and related entries. Most likely video screenshots, considering also File:AntiBombSquad.png = grabbed from http://poliedro.cl/2015/06/19/video-institucional-esfocar-2014/ (06.2015) = https://poliedroproducciones.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/esfocar-2014-08329.jpg (alternativ video source: https://vimeo.com/124447695). Flags and logos may be in public domain by other reasons but relevant info must be provided.

Gunnex (talk) 07:59, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 13:12, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Deablith (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://65.media.tumblr.com/9e657f62d52fe38653c295d4faf8bf1c/tumblr_o98i8u04SM1qg9gheo1_500.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:47, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Deablith (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Deablith and previous mass DRs (last remaining file so far, despite a probadly copyrighted logo already tagged with no-permission)

Gunnex (talk) 08:55, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eric850130 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Every power plant in Taiwan, photography is required by the policy of Taipower Company. It is stipulated that to be granted entry into the power plant was "No Photo". Apparently, he uploaded these photo disclosed to the public without gaining the consent of Taipower Company. As shown below:

These images were all uploaded by User:Eric850130. I believe they should be deleted because there is no permission from Taipower Company (see OTRS). --Liji (talk) 08:55, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above pictures was taken after I got the permission from the Taiwan Power Company (TPC), also the TPC arranged visits for me and assigned employees to assist me took photographs in every power plant. if you need any clarification, you may call the power plants below which I've been visited to ask for verifying, my real surname is "鄧" (Deng), I'm sure that the staff would glad to prove that there was a Mr.鄧 visited the power plant.
  • 蘭陽發電廠 (Lan-Yang Hydroelectric Power Plant) +886 3 9893854 #201
  • 東部發電廠 (Tung-Pu Hydroelectric Power Plant) +886 3 8350161 #311
  • 高屏發電廠 (Kao-Ping Hydroelectric Power Plant) +886 7 6851079
  • 東興發電廠 (Tung-Xin Hydroelectric Power Plant) +886 89 322481 #331
And User:Liji6085 had made some mistakes, the "烏山頭水力發電廠" and "烏山嶺引水隧道" are not owned by Taiwan Power Company, they are owned by the Chia-Nan Irrigation Association. And I also got the permission from the association to took the pictures above.
My english is bad,so if you understand Chinese you can view the chinese version.Eric Deng (talk) 10:03, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The English dialogue above was modified by Sean Young (User:Assanges) in order to improve readability, which has been permitted by Eric. -- @assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 11:37, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
以上遭到提報刪除的照片皆由我向台灣電力公司各發電廠申請後,獲得入廠參訪的。而且,這些照片如果非我向台電申請取景,台電公司根本不可能發布這麼詳細的發電廠照片,有需要證明,請歡迎向台電公司各發電廠聯繫,是否曾有位"鄧"先生向發電廠申請入廠參訪。或是可詢問中華維基媒體協會的Reke Wang,這些發電廠參訪是我請他以中華民國維基媒體協會名義申請後,由台電核准再由我進到發電廠參訪的。
而且,用戶User:Liji6085根本把台灣所有發電廠歸類於台灣電力公司,但是,"烏山頭水力發電廠" 以及 "烏山嶺引水隧道"是由嘉南農田水利會所擁有,並非由台電所有,也是我向該單位申請許可後前往取景的。遭到如此提報刪除實在不解。Eric Deng (talk) 10:03, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
本人為Wikimedia Taiwan祕書長。本會於2016年3月15日發函台電公眾服務處,協助Eric Deng申請至蘭陽發電廠拍照;又於5月27日發函台電南部發電廠,申請至該電廠拍照。特此證明。--Reke (talk) 10:24, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I, as the Chief Secretary of Wikimedia Taiwan Chapter. I hereby declare that the Chapter has sent an official letter to the Taipower PR Department ask for assisting Eric Deng on the visiting of Lan-Yang Hydroelectric Power Plant on 15th March, 2016; and another official letter on 27th May, 2016 to the Nanpu Power Plant request a visit for photo taking. --Reke (talk) 10:24, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The statement above was briefly translated to English by Sean Young (User:Assanges), which was requested by Reke. -- @assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 11:37, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Eric850130: So please, you should be looked at [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], and [22]. Where is it written in these image that you say "烏山頭水力發電廠以及烏山嶺引水隧道是由嘉南農田水利會所擁有"? The best way to do this is an email sent to OTRS from Taipower Company, requesting that photography permission and upload license made to these image. Otherwise, we don't know why do you can photography.--Liji (talk) 12:00, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am a Chinesese Wikipedia administrator. Liji6085 is banned Replymotor's puppet[23] and likes to make troubles for someone. Please disregard Liji6085.烏山頭水力發電廠 and 新烏山嶺引水隧道 are owned by 嘉南農田水利會.See [24][25].--Outlookxp (talk) 12:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you think that User:Liji6085 is using User:Replymotor's puppet, could you find the administrators at Category:Commons administrators, and to tell them that "Liji6085 is Replymotor's puppet".--Liji (talk) 12:39, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Liji6085: You can see the烏山頭水力發電廠 and 烏山嶺引水隧道 on chinese wikipedia,the "烏山頭水力發電廠" and "烏山嶺引水隧道" are owned by 嘉南農田水利會/嘉南實業(Chia-Nan Irrigation Association) not owned by Taiwan Power Company(TPC). Not all of Power plant in Taiwan are owned by TPC,please understand.Eric Deng (talk) 12:36, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry! And now here only is for discussion about "Since the power plant is stipulated No Photo why do you can photography?" Also, we need OTRS confirmation of the license, as like File:Bazhenov-Vsevolod-Spring-on Volkhov-River- nov74bw.jpg has OTRS permission.--Liji (talk) 12:54, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
From the above responses I told you I got the permission from every where power plant I went by TPC.
Tung-Pu Hydro Power Plant has 11 units,include the "Li-Yu Unit"、"Bei-Hi Unit"、"Long-Xi Unit"、"Long-Jiant Unit"、"Shui-Lien Unit"、"Tong-Men Unit"、"Yuon-Shu Unit"、"Chu-Yin Unit"、"Ching-Shui Unit"、"Ching-Liu Unit"、"Xi-Kou Unit",and I got the permission from Tung-Pu Hydro Power Plant in January,2016. The Tung-Pu Hydro Power Plant appoint a staff to take me to the 11 units in January 13~14,2016,so the above pictures from Tung-Pu Hydro Power Plant are all took by me.if you need any clarification, you may call the power plants below which I've been visited to ask for verifying, my real surname is "鄧" (Deng), I'm sure that the staff would glad to prove that there was a Mr.鄧 visited the power plant.This was I told you again.
Lan-Yang Hydroelectric Power Plant has two units,include the "Yuan-Shan Unit"(圓山機組)、"Tien-Pei Unit"(天埤機組),I visited there two units in july 05,2016.About why I can visit two units you can see the above Reke 's responses.
I have friend worked at Banan Creek Small hydroelectric power plan,and his position is director,he call Mr.杜,So I often go the this power plant to find my friend,and one time I tookthis picture.
I visit the Tung-Xin Hydro Power Plant、Gao-Ping Hydro Power Plant is in same way Tung-Pu Hydro Power Plant all took by me and all I got the premission by TPC.Eric Deng (talk) 15:00, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Even so, you still have to comply with the policies of Wikimedia Commons. I can only say: "I can not help you with that process, as I am not the OTRS volunteers of Wikimedia Commons."--Liji (talk) 15:54, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per Reke and Outlookxp. I'm also an admin on Chinese Wikipedia, and I can ensure that those photos were taken by Eric850130 himself..- Earth Saver (talk) at 15:25, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think you made a mistake. It's really problem is: "Since the power plant is stipulated No Photo, and as you can see, User:Eric850130 uploaded these images is not to gain OTRS permission from Taipower Company."--Liji (talk) 16:28, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Per Natuur12's reply below.- Earth Saver (talk) at 03:36, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per Reke.--Carrotkit (talk) 15:26, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per Commons:Non-copyright restrictions. This is not a copyright concern and therefor something between the uploader and Taipower Company. Natuur12 (talk) 16:27, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
But, I think these images should be deleted due to COM:PRP reason #2 and #3, in which case so-called "The copyright owner" is Taipower Company (because it is stipulated "No Photo"), not User:Eric850130.--Liji (talk) 16:53, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That is not how copyright law works. If someone takes a photograph at a place where it is not allowed to take photographs it does not affect the copyrigh status of the work. Eric850130 might or might not had permission to take those photographs (he states he has and I fail to see why we should not believe him) but the house rules are irrelevant since Commons does not care about most non copyright restrictions. Natuur12 (talk) 18:09, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep the images taken by Eric; he does not need permissions to upload them here in terms of copyright. He may run afoul of other non-copyright law.
 Delete the images which were taken by someone else (e.g., File:Qing-Shui Hydroelectricity.jpg) unless we get OTRS permission. Liji is correct on this point. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:50, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, that one should be deleted. Though the majority of those files are own work. Natuur12 (talk) 19:04, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Liji6085: I understood your point,some pictures like theFile:Qing-Shui Hydroelectricity.jpg is I call the staff member in TPC Tung-Pu Power plant took that picture for me and he done send to me.I wasn's understood OTRS before,so I direct upload not use OTRS,but I real got the premission from TPC Tung-Pu Power Plant,So now,if I can,I will edit the some pictures premission to be the OTRS Template,can call the Tung-Pu power plant to send the OTRS email to OTRS.
But I need to say.Some pictutes I made the mistake before,so I 'm sorry and I will fix it if I can.But other pictures are real took by me,I spent too much time to visited the every power plant.Eric Deng (talk) 23:14, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep the ones taken by the uploader, unless the uploader wants them deleted. If there is a law against such photos, the uploader is the one at risk, though this sounds more like "house rules" at museums, concert venues, etc. These are non-copyright restrictions, and do not affect the copyright in any way -- at most it would be some other sort of law or implied contract which is broken. We leave it up to the uploader to judge if they were unintended consequences of uploading them -- if the uploader would prefer them to be removed, then fine, otherwise we keep them. The author / copyright owner is determined according to law, and a property owner cannot inject themselves into that process (copyright transfers generally require written documents, so they can't be a condition of entry either). Carl Lindberg (talk) 01:53, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per Reke. I'm also a sysop on Chinese Wikipedia, these photographs were taken by Eric Deng absolutely, so I don't think need to gain OTRS permission from TPC.--James970028 (talk) 10:00, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination Natuur12's explanation is almost in conformity with Clindberg's reply to me at here. Now, I came to understand that OTRS does not apply in this case. In addition, I admit my wrong-doing on this matter, because I understand wrongly to using the policies of Wikimedia Commons. Finally, I apologize to all those who participated in talk page discussion.--Liji (talk) 16:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above/withdrawn - if there are copyright problems with any of these, that can be better addressed with individual deletion requests if needed. --INeverCry 00:23, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cropped from an image that has been deleted, see Commons:Deletion requests/Richkahn and en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard V. Kahn Jochen Burghardt (talk) 09:03, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related zhwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 09:09, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can only be reproduced with permisson. And I have none - sorry. Rsteen (talk) 09:13, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Have second thoughts about this one: The architect Ove Petersen died in 1892, so how can kunstbib.dk maintain a copyright on a reproduction of his drawings? Is this not just an instance of "PD-Art"? Hope that someone more knowledgeable can help? Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 06:44, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-Art/PD-old-100. --INeverCry 00:25, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

maybe old and self photographed (you ca see the shadow) but I really doubt it is own work Avron (talk) 09:17, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[Probadly grabbed from social media] Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ruwiki entry 2x speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 09:33, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:36, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:RockStarAjitKumarVerma

[edit]

All files were uploaded by User:RockStarAjitKumarVerma; this user page has meanwhile being deleted due to self-promotion. None of the files has a meaningful description, and each one appears to be self-promotion / personal photo album, possibly left over from the user page deletion. All files are contained in Category:Ajitkumarverma, which I removed from Category:Students by country, and which should be deleted as well. --Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:04, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bba999 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent (multiple) EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Bba999 (file cropper). Uploaded since 04.2016. Living examples:


Gunnex (talk) 10:13, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Copied from DR talk by Gunnex)
hello

all the pictures used for those articles are allowed by the owners of them.

i'm a member of passionmilitaria.com , you can see the thread where people like "mc" are helping me to do those articles : http://www.passionmilitaria.com/t103750-creation-d-articles-wikipedia-sur-les-sabres-francais

and all the photos taken on jjb-collection.com are also allowed to be used by Jean Jacques Buigné himself

i have e-mails of every member of passionmilitaria and JJB to prove all that. what do i have to do with that ?

thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bba999 (talk • contribs) 17:31, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Bba999: If that is indeed the case, please send an email to COM:OTRS and explain your situation to them, providing evidence that the copyright holders have given permission to publish the files under a free license. If everything checks out, they will restore the files, if deleted in the meantime. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is all volunteers and is understaffed and may take several weeks to process the license.Gunnex (talk) 19:06, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination/OTRS permission required. --INeverCry 00:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 10:16, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF (a Google Chrome variant combined with the logo of en:Tokio Hotel, a German pop-rock/alternative rock band). May be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 10:22, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:V.F. Kramarenko2.jpeg is a similar photo, however without cursor Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:23, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Talk2prabhat001 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, found elsewhere on web, uploaded since 14.07.2016, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Talk2prabhat001 and (example) File:Chitwan Medical Teaching Hospital.jpg = grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/1432280653662275/photos/a.1432281670328840.1073741825.1432280653662275/1432281676995506/?type=3&theater (2013). File:Palungtar.png + File:Paluntar.gif are unused screenshots of the infobox at en:Palungtar.

Gunnex (talk) 10:41, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author and date unknown, no evidence for permission Krd 10:29, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Author and date unknown? That's right! It's to old to find out. Even the MAN Museum Augsburg, the owner of the image, dont't know this informations. But they gave me the approval to use it. --Nixnubix (talk) 14:37, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom/COM:PRP. --INeverCry 00:32, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unless you consider those MSG letters to be a somewhat standard font, this logo may be above the threshold of originality and copyrightable . Better get a release from the rightholders. Same for File:MSG 150dpi0001.jpg. Nemo 10:41, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related eswiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 10:49, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 10:50, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related zhwiki entry several times speedy deleted. User indef blocked at zhwiki. Gunnex (talk) 10:51, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sometimesbecause (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry speedy deleted.

Gunnex (talk) 11:00, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Ефим Самуилович Хесин.jpg, with slightly less file size, but same dimensions Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:04, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 11:19, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. EXIF is missing. It seems the original photograph was snapped. Wikicology (talk) 11:22, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image. It is probably taken from here Wikicology (talk) 11:30, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 11:32, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small and blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:34, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Non-educational image. Wikicology (talk) 11:34, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

album image which without the approval of the copyright holder Jacklamf1d14 (talk) 11:33, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 11:35, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 11:44, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 11:52, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Média Wikipedia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 11:46, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image. It was probably taken from here Wikicology (talk) 12:06, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image. I don't see how this is uploader's own work. Wikicology (talk) 12:08, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 12:09, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence for own work, COM:OTRS required Krd 12:10, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album Wikicology (talk) 12:12, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Maccianno. United States Musician From Seattle, Wa


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lacrymocéphale as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.ga-online.org/#!imprint/cohy "The layout, graphics and pictures used in this website are protected by copyright." - Add: eligible for PD-Textlogo? Wdwd (talk) 15:05, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP - looks relatively complex. --INeverCry 00:43, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author unknown, no permission Krd 12:14, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission for depicted photgraphs Krd 12:15, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unknown photographs -Family Private property / Unbekannter Fotograf - Familien Privatbesitz (PD-old-70?) Fuertas 15:29, 24 Jul 2016 (CEST)

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

depicted person unlikely to be the creator, COM:OTRS required Krd 12:15, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unknown photographs -Family Private property. poss. depicted person be the creator or photograph by her father / Unbekannter Fotograf - Familien Privatbesitz. Dargestellte Person kann die Aufnahme gemacht haben, wahrscheinlich aber der Vater; somit Unbekannt (PD-old-70?) Fuertas 15:37, 24 Jul 2016 (CEST)

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 12:17, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by I akshat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 12:17, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image. Uploader is probably not the artist who owns the work. Wikicology (talk) 12:19, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence of permission, COM:OTRS required Krd 12:21, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and obiously not own work. Uploaded on 16.07.2016 by Histoavranches (talk · contributions · Statistics) for fr:Henri Provost de la Fardinière (1897–1937), a French politician and writer. Taken (per file title) in 1936. Historical photos may be in public domain by other means but relevant info (proper author/date of creation or first disclosure/country of creation information) must be provided to determine copyrights status. Gunnex (talk) 12:25, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 12:25, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:02, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 12:26, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo with no Exif data Wikicology (talk) 12:28, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


this is not in used. Bhurgriak (talk) 10:03, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 12:30, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 12:32, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. The blog is probably not the copyright holder of the work. Wikicology (talk) 12:33, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Osamaeid.111 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claims of own work on these images of facebook or smaller sizes uploaded by a user with warnings and a final notice.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:49, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 12:43, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User: Maccianno

[edit]

Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. --Wikicology (talk) 12:45, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright violation of http://www.vanitatis.elconfidencial.com/casas-reales/2015-04-02/oympia-de-grecia-cressida-bonas-asi-son-las-bbb-de-la-realeza-europea_752032/ 62.64.152.154 12:45, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 12:48, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Per file title obviously grabbed somehwhere from Internet. Gunnex (talk) 12:57, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. Uploader's is probably not the copyright holder. The image was probably obtained from here Wikicology (talk) 12:58, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 13:00, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 13:01, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1990s postcard, no real source, no evidence of license. Would need OTRS from Tony Day, who is credited on the artwork itself. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:06, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Art work by a ling artist Wikicology (talk) 13:07, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader/subject is not the photographer who took the image. The original photographer needs to send permission to our COM:OTRS team. Wikicology (talk) 07:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image. It was probably obtained from here Wikicology (talk) 13:10, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader/subject is not the photographer who took the image. The original photographer needs to send permission to our COM:OTRS team. Wikicology (talk) 07:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andrejpwalker (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Three different images which are unlikely to all be the uploader’s own work. File:Desmond 'Des' Rea.jpg is a 1968 photo which appears to have been scanned from a magazine or some other publication, File:City University Club Smoking Room.jpg has no metadata and is most likely from [26] (a previous upload from this uploader was deleted as a copyvio from this site), File:David Morris MP.jpg has an uncropped version at [27] and [28].

January (talk) 13:10, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 13:13, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related trwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 13:14, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD in China, but not in the US (published 1955). Miniapolis 13:39, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign work published without a proper notice of copyright. Isn't it in this case also PD-US?--Kopiersperre (talk) 14:11, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It would be {{PD-US-no notice}} if the source indicated that it was published in the US, but it doesn't; it also doesn't meet requirement #3 of {{PD-1996}}. FWIW, the original uploader hasn't edited since last October and has a history of copyright problems. All the best, Miniapolis 16:33, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fernando Juárez Cortés (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Promo shots uploaded in 06.2016 for es:Carolina Ayala, a Mexican actress. Probadly grabbed from social media, considering also used as Twitter profile image via https://twitter.com/CarolinaAyalaG = https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/642523363018190848/DqBNR0kz.jpg (last modified: 2015)

Update: File:Carolina Ayala González .jpg + File:Carolina Ayala.jpg = grabbed & photoshopped from http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3770265/mediaviewer/rm2921586688 (copyrighted work by "Photo by Christoper Esqueda") = http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMzA5MjU1NDc4MV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNzYzNTA0NzE@._V1_SY1000_CR0,0,662,1000_AL_.jpg (last modified: 2015)

Gunnex (talk) 13:39, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vilhjalmurs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. Backgammon screenshots uploaded in a row on 15.07.2016 an all grabbed (sometimes derived) from Internet = (example) File:Is kotra2.png --> http://www.bkgm.com/rules/rulfig2.gif (last modified: 2005). They may be may be in public domain by other reasons but relevant info must be provided.

Gunnex (talk) 13:57, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 13:57, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 13:57, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related eswiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 13:58, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, without EXIF, probably from facebook and not an own work. Possible copyvio. C messier (talk) 14:01, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrtum, identisch mit Seutter Stutgardia Würtenbergensis Ducatus Metropolis.jpg Gerd Leibrock (talk) 14:05, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://images.panet.co.il/articles/36474.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nonialaniz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no freedom of panorama in italy 151.42.41.19 14:19, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no freedom of panorama in italy 151.42.41.19 14:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.asianbw.org/images/joomlart/corporate/sam-1.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image credited to the Ohio EPA, which is a state department, not a federal one. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Works by the US Government, PD-USGov does not apply. Eureka Lott 14:31, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Etaylor99 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Offensive image. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Johndavis88 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.sethclabough.com/uploads/gallery_image/49047/medium_author_seth_clabough.png.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anonymous810 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Anonymous810 (with similar files deleted). Per FBMD... or * grabbed from Facebook. Considering also File:Swami Sadhananda Giri after one of his speeches.jpg (07.2016) --> similar to https://www.facebook.com/kriyayogashram/photos/a.147866968624011.36521.128102160600492/984400814970618/?type=3&theater (02.2016)

Gunnex (talk) 14:46, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5163/5373119712_f1b258b566_b.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete = https://www.flickr.com/photos/tamuresearch/5373119712/ (2011, © by "Texas A&M University Division of Research"). Gunnex (talk) 07:04, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kevin169ny (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.scranton.edu/studentlife/studentaffairs/careers/images/ariel-2.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joeblackkhole (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://www.flickr.com/photos/78348039@N03/16144277897.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. Gunnex (talk) 18:15, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating also (per above) further uploads by this user:

Gunnex (talk) 18:17, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anibal Romero2016 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://revistabotineros.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/ac-700x350.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matiasassler (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CVfzWk-WUAAIDfn.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Strudionivo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Poland. which is OK only for works that are "permanently exhibited on the publicly accessible roads, streets, squares or gardens" (see also {{FoP-Poland}}), considering indoor shots of artworks by living Polish artist pl:Jan Biela (1952–). File:Wystawa-Rzezb-WP 000973.jpg may be borderline (too blurry to detect copyrighted elements?). COM:OTRS-permission by "Jan Biela" needed.

Gunnex (talk) 14:56, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own? https://tineye.com/search/76622aeaa8b5aed92f92f263696c87f516116c70/?sort=size&order=desc Oscar_. (talk) 14:58, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

erreur de nom Mafran21 (talk) 15:06, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: use {{Rename}} instead. --INeverCry 00:45, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 19:40, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 19:41, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Asturio Cantabrio as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author or uploader request deletion Yasu (talk) 15:15, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:47, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Asturio Cantabrio as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author or uploader request deletion Yasu (talk) 15:16, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:47, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Asturio Cantabrio as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author or uploader request deletion Yasu (talk) 15:18, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:47, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Asturio Cantabrio as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author or uploader request deletion Yasu (talk) 15:18, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:47, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Asturio Cantabrio as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author or uploader request deletion Yasu (talk) 15:18, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:47, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Asturio Cantabrio as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author or uploader request deletion Yasu (talk) 15:18, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:46, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Asturio Cantabrio as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author or uploader request deletion Yasu (talk) 15:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:46, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Asturio Cantabrio as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author or uploader request deletion Yasu (talk) 15:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:46, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Asturio Cantabrio as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author or uploader request deletion Yasu (talk) 15:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:46, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 15:22, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:47, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Rssäl 15:30, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:47, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Rssäl 15:37, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:47, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission of the original photographer (Omke Oudeman) or proof of ownership of this picture is needed. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 15:38, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:47, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file in violazione di copyright (vedi metadati). Danyele (talk) 15:42, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:47, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file in violazione di copyright. Danyele (talk) 15:43, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:47, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Omar Cardoso

[edit]

Unused low-quality personal snapshots without educational value; out of scope. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 15:44, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:47, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Shivang55

[edit]

Unused poor-quality personal snapshots with no educational value; out of scope. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:05, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image probablement copiée puis découpée de cette page par exemple : https://iglesiasantateresita.wordpress.com/2009/02/13/notas-pastorales-monsenor-antonio-jose-lopez-castillo-la-lepra-del-corazon/ Pitthée (talk) 16:17, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Affiche non libre Habertix (talk) 16:34, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright http://www.gd-archi.ch/projet/stade-de-la-tuiliere/ Remy34 (talk) 16:37, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph shows a copyrighted work of art. Gnom (talk) 16:40, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=1677228, http://www.tdg.ch/savoirs/toit-novateur-parlement/story/19305450?track Remy34 (talk) 16:41, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of the People's Republic of China.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:06, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MC Escher was dead in 1972, therefore, this work can't be in the public domain Daehan (talk) 17:12, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho professional-looking format, but/and missing EXIF data to verify origin - your opinions? Roland zh (talk) 17:18, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivatives of the deleted File:Bowl hygeia.jpg. No source, no permission.

Sealle (talk) 17:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Фото обнаруживается в Интернете до загрузки на Викисклад https://new.vk.com/id984942?z=photo984942_378235951%2Fphotos984942, http://ask.fm/Maria_Julia_fan Dogad75 (talk) 17:27, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose. Not used. George Chernilevsky talk 17:45, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free sculpture by S. Batič (d. 2015). Eleassar (t/p) 18:56, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is irrelevant whether it is small or not. It is not incidental in this image, so it does not meet the requirements of COM:DM#Slovenia: "incidental with another object or work, it could be at will replaced with another work". --Eleassar (t/p) 08:56, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per COM:DM. --INeverCry 00:51, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free sculpture by S. Batič (d. 2015). Eleassar (t/p) 18:56, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is irrelevant whether it is small or not. It is not incidental in this image, so it does not meet the requirements of COM:DM#Slovenia: "incidental with another object or work, it could be at will replaced with another work". --Eleassar (t/p) 08:56, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep That is absolutely incidental. It's not necessarily small, but if you want to take a picture of the lake and mountains, the statue is going to be there no matter what. That is what incidental means. Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:19, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per COM:DM. --INeverCry 00:52, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free sculpture by S. Batič (d. 2015). Eleassar (t/p) 18:56, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is actually not so small; and in any case, it is irrelevant whether it is small or not. It is not incidental in this image, so it does not meet the requirements of COM:DM#Slovenia: "incidental with another object or work, it could be at will replaced with another work". --Eleassar (t/p) 08:56, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep It is clearly incidental as there is no way to take the same panorama without also including the sculpture. Although I would still delete it because it is of a low quality (blurred). Ruslik (talk) 13:19, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep This is what incidental means; if you want to take a picture of the lake then you are going to include the statue. It is inherently part of the scene there. It is photos which focus specifically on the statue which would be a problem. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per COM:DM. --INeverCry 00:52, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mitarbeit beendet Fotochronist (talk) 18:57, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:53, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mitarbeit beendet Fotochronist (talk) 18:57, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:53, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mitarbeit beendet Fotochronist (talk) 18:57, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:53, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mitarbeit beendet Fotochronist (talk) 18:58, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:53, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mitarbeit beendet Fotochronist (talk) 18:58, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:53, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mitarbeit beendet Fotochronist (talk) 18:58, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:53, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mitarbeit beendet Fotochronist (talk) 18:59, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:53, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mitarbeit beendet Fotochronist (talk) 18:59, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:53, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mitarbeit beendet Fotochronist (talk) 18:59, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:53, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mitarbeit beendet Fotochronist (talk) 19:00, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:53, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mitarbeit beendet Fotochronist (talk) 19:00, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:53, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mitarbeit beendet Fotochronist (talk) 19:01, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:53, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-authorized copy from a private document. Yanguas (talk) 19:02, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andi Rustandi Sunarya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, found elsewhere on the web. Historical photos may be in public domain by other means but relevant info (proper author/date of creation or first disclosure/country of creation information) must be provided to determine copyrights status.

Gunnex (talk) 19:10, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source=own, but this is rather scan or screenshot. Sławek Borewicz (talk) 19:15, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license on this image is not correct, and I am not convinced it is free. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded on 18.07.2016 by 1-upload user Cowsaidmoo (talk · contributions · Statistics) the photo is circulating since 04.2016 on official Facebook via https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10154167908942094&set=piaarp.804877093.10153766649232094&type=3&theater and on Amazon since 2015 via http://www.amazon.com/Karlyn-Pipes/e/B018J2CQR0 = https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/A1L8ezZqYYL._SY2448_.jpg (last modified: 2015), needing further info and/or permission(s). Gunnex (talk) 19:25, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Uppaluppal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, 2x unsourced collages of a photo + 2x book covers, most likely derived from elsewhere copyrighted material.

Gunnex (talk) 19:39, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chloe_Bennet_by_Gage_Skidmore.jpg Rssäl 19:44, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Uchiel Amiro'an (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image

Rssäl 19:47, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Morkins (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, found elsewhere on web. Historical photos may be in public domain by other means but relevant info (proper author/date of creation or first disclosure/country of creation information) must be provided to determine copyrights status.

Gunnex (talk) 19:48, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is claiming copyright but we would need OTRS confirmation Whpq (talk) 19:53, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is claiming copyright but we would need OTRS confirmation Whpq (talk) 19:54, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is claiming copyright but we would need OTRS confirmation Whpq (talk) 19:54, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is claiming copyright but we would need OTRS confirmation Whpq (talk) 19:54, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is claiming copyright but we would need OTRS confirmation Whpq (talk) 19:54, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is claiming copyright but we would need OTRS confirmation Whpq (talk) 19:56, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sarah Dourado (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image

Rssäl 19:58, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Rssäl 20:00, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hash613 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploaded in 07.2016. Considering also File:Kosher switch founder Andy Menashe Kalati.jpg = video screenshot grabbed from (example) https://www.facebook.com/JewishStandard/videos/10152893031538717/ (2015, at 0m23s, © by "The Jewish Standard") or (original source) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdbkvJznmwU&t=21 (2015, © by " KosherSwitch")

Gunnex (talk) 20:04, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removing File:Kosher switch installed with timer.jpg from DR: Uploader sent to me personally the original file in higher res (3264x1840 px) and exif (digicam identifiable). The file was cropped in correct manner. See also User talk:Gunnex#Delete reconsider please. The Youtube screenshot File:Kosher switch founder Andy Menashe Kalati.jpg is (as declared by uploader: "(...) as I'm new to the whole Wiki scene and rules. I thought (...)") not own work by uploader and needs to be deleted. Thx @Hash613: for the feedback. Gunnex (talk) 20:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Naturegeographie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Naturegeographie. Uploaded since 06.2016. Probadly screenshotted & cropped from copyrighted sources. Considering also:


Gunnex (talk) 20:21, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thiago244 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted.

Gunnex (talk) 20:24, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in scope, unclear copyright status Pibwl (talk) 20:27, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Pibwl (talk) 20:27, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam image DS (talk) 02:24, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope High Contrast (talk) 09:28, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused promo, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 20:28, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 20:30, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lagioke (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used respectively uploaded since 05.2016 by a user who didn't make real contributions, apart from the creation of the user page for cross wiki spam. See also mw:User talk:Lagioke.

Gunnex (talk) 20:31, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lagioke (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the Bahasa Indonesian Wikipedia, where the subject's page was speedily deleted as spam in December 2016. Out of project scope.

xplicit 01:25, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:48, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lizenz in den Metadaten verträgt sich nicht mit der Lizenzangabe. Uploader darauf angesprochen. Freigabe bisher aber wohl nicht angefordert. Von Urheberrechtsverletzung ist daher auszugehen. Offenbacherjung (talk) 21:04, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It doesn't belong in the naturism categhory. An encyclopedia is not a place where appear in order to self promote. 79.47.29.241 21:18, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy  Keep No valid reason to delete. This is IP in a moral crusade? First Wikimedia Commons is not an Encyclopædia, second this file belongs in naturism categories as this is clearly an naturist woman in a beach, third this image is not an self promotion as this file was uploaded by someone other than the flickr user (an heterosexual couple), fourth this file is clearly in scope, as seen per categories Category:Female bottomlessness in photography, Category:Clitoral hood piercings, Category:Bottomless women with blond hair, Category:Bottomless women with piercings, Category:Bottomless women with blue background, Category:Nude or partially nude yellow women and Category:Naturist women. Tm (talk) 21:30, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No moral crusade. It's just pertinence of an image. It doesn't belong in naturism category. Please read the meaning of naturism and you will know what I'm talking about. I requested deletion because I tried to put it out from the naturism category but it was always re-uploaded.


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:57, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 21:18, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It doesn't belong in the naturism category. An encyclopedia is not a place where appear in order to self promote 79.47.29.241 21:19, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy  Keep No valid reason to delete. This is IP in a moral crusade? First Wikimedia Commons is not an Encyclopædia, second this file belongs in naturism categories as this is clearly an naturist woman in a beach, third this image is not an self promotion as this file was uploaded by someone other than the flickr user (an heterosexual couple), fourth this file is clearly in scope, as seen per categories Category:Bottomless standing women seen from behind, Category:Female human backs, Category:Female bottomlessness in photography, Category:Nude or partially nude women with both hands on hips, Category:Naked female buttocks, Category:Bottomless women with blond hair, Category:Blue sunsets, Category:Yellow clothing, female, Category:Bottomless women with blue background and Category:Naturist women.Tm (talk) 21:27, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:57, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikikiwi898 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Promo material (history, assets, logo, aerial shot of production) for "Lancer Furniture" uploaded on 15.07.2016 and speedy deleted two days later at enwiki.

Gunnex (talk) 21:29, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused selfie, might be used only for promotion. MetaKnight93 (talk) 21:30, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Pomological Watercolor POM00004209.jpg, which has a better label. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 21:30, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional image. Simply out of scope. MetaKnight93 (talk) 21:35, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. User indef blocked at eswiki. Gunnex (talk) 21:37, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Regal38 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 21:54, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 22:00, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related plwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 22:02, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki (hijacked by uploader) reverted. Gunnex (talk) 22:04, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. User indef blocked at itwiki. Gunnex (talk) 22:18, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 22:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related entwiki entry speedy deleted. User indef blocked at enwiki. Gunnex (talk) 22:21, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 22:24, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete The uploader is marked as "UNKNOWN" and the source is hoerspielsachen.de, a private-owned German website that is not affiliated with maritim and can't be the copyright holder. Therefore, the usage of this logo is a clear copyright infringement and must be deleted. 78.54.164.142 22:28, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image. It was probably obtained from here Wikicology (talk) 22:35, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt this is uploader own work. Wikicology (talk) 22:54, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is my own work that come from a profesional file with no copyright. Even so, for me is umconfortable to have another picture in question, please delete it. I´ll try to change it for a plain picture. Thank you for your professional zeal. --Lechazochurro (talk) 07:31, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was originally uploaded to the official website of group BTS here. It does not have the appropriate license to be uploaded to Commons and is thus suspected of copyright violation. Vermeer 9 (talk) 23:05, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dieses Wappen war so niemals das Wappen eines Regierungsbezirkes. Vielmehr handelt es sich bei diesem Wappen um das Wappen des Landkreises Sömmerda, das der Uploader zu etwas neuem "umbastelte". Fränsmer (talk) 23:26, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted material. Copyrights belongs to Aygan Yayıncılık or the artist of the material. Evolutionoftheuniverse (talk) 23:26, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file originally appeared on Korean magazine CéCi and was uploaded to the official Facebook of group BTS here. It does not have the appropriate license to be uploaded to Commons and is thus suspected of copyright violation. Vermeer 9 (talk) 23:31, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was originally uploaded to the official Twitter of group BTS here. It does not have the appropriate license to be uploaded to Commons and is thus suspected of copyright violation. Vermeer 9 (talk) 23:33, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was originally uploaded to the official Facebook page of group BTS here. It does not have the appropriate license to be uploaded to Commons and is thus suspected of copyright violation. Vermeer 9 (talk) 23:36, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because the name is incorrect and a new file was created (File:Warszawa - rezerwaty przyrody, zespoły przyrodniczo-krajobrazowe, użytki ekologiczne - plan, mapa.png/overlay.kml) Darekk2 (talk) 23:43, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not from the US federal government and has the wrong license. It comes from a private website and does not have the attribution, attribution-sharealike or public domain dedication license which Commons accepts. The flickr license is Public Domain mark which means the private copyright owner can change the license at any moment without consequences. He/She does not release any rights with this license. This flickr account also has few images on its photostream. Leoboudv (talk) 23:57, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not from the US federal government and has the wrong license. It comes from a private website and does not have the attribution, attribution-sharealike or public domain dedication license which Commons accepts. The flickr license is Public Domain mark which means the private copyright owner can change the license at any moment without consequences. He/She does not release any rights with this license. This flickr account also has few images on its photostream. Leoboudv (talk) 23:57, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historic photo from 1949 is unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Diannaa (talk) 00:00, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mitarbeit beendet Fotochronist (talk) 18:56, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This file was uploaded as "own work", while the Copyright notice at the bottom of the original file shows that it was created from OSM data via MapOSMatic. If the source section of the description page gets corrected, there is no more reason to delete the file. --Sitacuisses (talk) 21:51, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Mitarbeit beendet ist kein Grund zum Löschen. --Sanandros (talk) 13:23, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mitarbeit beendet Fotochronist (talk) 18:56, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This file was uploaded as "own work", while the Copyright notice at the bottom of the original file shows that it was created from OSM data via MapOSMatic. If the source section of the description page gets corrected, there is no more reason to delete the file. --Sitacuisses (talk) 21:51, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Mitarbeit beendet ist kein Grund zum Löschen. --Sanandros (talk) 13:23, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nominated as copyvio by User:Codename Lisa for "This image is non-free because it consists of two screenshots of Windows 10 and Windows 10 Mobile, both of which are non-free." - converted to DR, see here - not sure if Microsoft Sweden could be in a position to release a work from the mother company into a CC license Jcb (talk) 16:43, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • My impression was that an official Microsoft Sweden Flickr account would have the rights to license the promo images it uploads. (It's not like it would have to come from some master Microsoft Flickr account...) czar 16:47, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Includes elements not owned by Microsoft (such as the 'Cars' title card-image). Per COM:Screenshots we require that all elements in a screenshot be free, since DM can't be claimed if intentionally in the image. We would require Microsoft or Microsoft Sweden to send email to OTRS to prove they own the rights to license away Disney's intellectual property (and given Disney's stance on copyright, that seems highly unlikely. They might have an agreement with Microsoft which allows them to use it for promotional materials, but as I said, not owned by Microsoft, so we need Disney [et al.]'s permission sent in). Josve05a (talk) 18:42, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Josve05a, how is the Cars logo not de minimis here? And secondarily, would there still be an issue if the de minimis parts were replaced? czar 03:51, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. First, the source material, Windows 10 and Windows 10 Mobile are non-free. In addition, Microsoft Corporation has a clear cut policy about relicensing its work. If this image was indeed free, Microsoft would have had attached a link to a long relicensing document; one that could be imported to OTRS.
  2. Second, it contains non-free works that are not Microsoft's, such as Cars and the Corbis wallpaper. De minimis? This image is super-high resolution! I believe the American expression "give me a break" applies to this certain incorrect claim.
  3. Before believing that this image is relicensed as free without seeing a strong evidence to support it, I invite you to consider how far-fetched this claim sounds: Microsoft has built a very profitable business around the non-free license of its Windows products. And this image, if indeed free, would compromise a lot of that business. It is, however, easier to believe that just anyone can create an account called "microsoftsweden". And in the event that the account belongs to the genuine article, again, humans are error-prone and may choose the wrong license sometimes. "Commons' users aim to build and maintain in good faith a repository of media files which to the best of our knowledge are free or freely-licensed."
Codename Lisa (talk) 08:04, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
this image, if indeed free, would compromise a lot of that business This statement needs more support, but if your argument is that their business is "compromised" because a press photo of the interface is free use, I don't see what legal precedent you'd be referencing. It would also have broad implications for our use of press photos for software around Commons. And I don't know why you would cast doubt on the legitimacy of the Microsoft Sweden account without explicitly claiming so. If you think the license is wrong on the part of the account, this DR is simply casting aspersions until you contact Microsoft Sweden and find out otherwise. And in that case, there are many other press photos from this Flickr account that would need to be deleted too. czar 15:39, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I love it when you nitpick on one point as if it is not part of a whole. ;) Casting this kind of aspersions (if you want to call it that) is totally allowed per COM:PCP. We have created OTRS for a reason: In Commons, the burden of providing iron-clad proof of license beyond all doubts is with the uploader. Users are expected to be able create derivative works out of Commons files without the threat being sued by Microsoft for violating their copyright. —Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 06:05, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't answer my question and I think it's the core question—not a nitpick—but okay czar 00:33, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - The CC-by license indicated on flickr is quite obviously bogus. Microsoft holds licenses to use and redistribute third party elements (logos, background image, etc) together with their own products, or in a promotional context. It's extremely unlikely that they are entitled to relicense that material under a CC license. This non-free material dominates the image, which is therefore necessarily also unfree and unsuitable for Commons. --Latebird (talk) 23:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Sorry but I don't consider those elements to be DM. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope. Screenshot. Wikicology (talk) 13:03, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a screenshot, it is a photograph that I took from a presentation at the MIT Media Laboratory, Cambridge on October 30th, 2015.User:Arikan


Deleted: in any case, it's a derivative of the image with unclear copyright statut, shown in the presentation. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:38, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, orphaned/replaced by File:HPPD Proposed Reaction.svg. Leyo 20:59, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment There's all sorts of mechanistic nonsense in both images (electron-flow that would not produce the given product structure), incorrect bonding of the aquo ligands to the iron atom, and poor choices of typography (MOS would specify more legible arrow-heads and + charge-symbols). At least the original (JPG) doesn't also have an exceeded octet (see SVG middle row, left structure, lower-right carbon of benzene-like ring). Pinging User:28Smiles (creator of SVG) for comments. The references in de:4-Hydroxyphenylpyruvat-Dioxygenase or en:4-Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase might be useful for redrawing this thing from scratch in a clearer way, and en.wp and de.wp have full style guides. DMacks (talk) 02:18, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. File:HPPD Proposed Reaction.svg cannot be deleted yet because it is in use. It should be corrected or removed from use. Ed (Edgar181) 19:33, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission.
 Info: see file discussion page. Wdwd (talk) 11:47, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license on description and source page sais "all rights reserved". --JuTa 04:18, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission.
 Info: See file discussion page Wdwd (talk) 11:58, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license on description and source page sais "all rights reserved". --JuTa 04:17, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission.
 Info: See file discussion page Wdwd (talk) 11:59, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license on description and source page sais "all rights reserved". --JuTa 04:15, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission.
 Info: See file discussion page. Wdwd (talk) 16:05, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license on description nor source page. --JuTa 04:20, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 螺钉 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio http://pmgs.kongfz.com/data/pre_show_pic/16/136/833.jpg. Chinese photos are free after 50 years from publishing. Taivo (talk) 15:42, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It has been published in 1940s. So what the problem? --Алый Король (talk) 01:40, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The photo is older than 50 years, but was it published more than 50 years ago? Taivo (talk) 08:14, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The source also has "kfzimg.com" trade mark on the photo.螺钉 (talk) 01:40, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unknown copyright situation. --Jcb (talk) 11:38, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no freedom of panorama in italy 151.42.41.19 14:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What makes you think this photo would need freedom of panorama? Nemo 14:29, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:24, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Italy. The "dead architects" exception as claimed by Italian parliament pronouncement is already deprecated. Architect Melchiorre Bega died in 1976 A1Cafel (talk) 06:39, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is it really a problem of freedom of panorama? It had been considered a no valid reason in the previous deletion request. --Spinoziano (BEIC) (talk) 08:10, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:27, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no freedom of panorama in italy 151.42.41.19 14:23, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm not so sure this photo is a derivative of copyrighted material. What is considered copyrighted here? Perhaps a couple objects which cover less than 10 % of the photo. Nemo 14:37, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:24, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am reopening this discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Internal of MAXXI. --Gnom (talk) 11:01, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused tif file, copy of File:Entrée de l'École au 19, rue de la Sorbonne 75005 Paris.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:24, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Delete: indeed, this is a duplication. Pro patria semper (talk) 15:46, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. D'accord on peut supprimer le .tif, il s'agit d'un doublon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by École des chartes (talk • contribs)

 Keep They are not identical as one has brighter colors than the other one.--Sanandros (talk) 13:19, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and uploader agreed.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:26, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mauvaise copie de file:Diócesis Católicas de Venezuela.PNG. Pitthée (talk) 16:10, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:31, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Moumou82 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: uploader cannot be the author since he appears on the picture
 Info: 1. See file discussion page. 2. A photo like this could by made by a self-timer on the camera or remote control. Wdwd (talk) 16:16, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Applies also to:

.--Wdwd (talk) 16:21, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no evidence that it is not as claimed.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:32, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Info File:Poto 30 avril 2016.png --> tagged with no permission considering http://acharaa.com/ar/112578 (04.2016) = https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ZLVbmlYaMCk/sddefault.jpg = video screenshot from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLVbmlYaMCk (04.2016, © by "mas chanel"). Gunnex (talk) 11:47, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is the photograph which sourced from Bollywood Hungama. However Bollywood permission does not extend to photos copyrighted by other websites. This photograph was taken on July 29, 2010, and the photograph was posted on the next day at The Times of India with a copyright notice. (a mention about date and times is in 935 lines of the view-source. see [view-source:http://photogallery.indiatimes.com/events/mumbai/jacqueline-gaming-championship/articleshow/6235937.cms]). This copyright holder is not Bollywood but Viral Bhayani. It was uploaded on commons after three years passed. The confirmation by the reviewer overlooks the image of The Times of India. I do not know whether the reviewer is a mistaker or liar, but at all events this review is wrong. This photograph is not included in the permission. Y.haruo (talk) 15:32, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If the result of this DR is 'delete', then there will be inevitable consequences for the 8.000+ files in Category:Files from Bollywood Hungama, because then they all rely on an unreliable permission. Jcb (talk) 16:45, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Jcb. I only want to protect the right of the true copyright holders.--Y.haruo (talk) 17:07, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am not offending you, I only say that if you are right, we have to look at other files as well. Jcb (talk) 21:21, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • This issue is the same as at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jacqueline Fernandez at Gillette Mach3 India Gaming Championship 2010.jpg. We've had problems specifically with Viral Bhayani's photos in the past too. BH is a large enough company to be reliable, but their contracts with the photographs may not be adhered to. This had come up during the OTRS discussions too. That is the reason that images on sets and shootings etc are not included in this ticket because their rights to those vary individually and they were not ready to let us know about them individually. Their contracts with the photographers for parties/events is exclusive with a transfer of copyright. There can be multiple explanations for this since copyright law is hardly ever enforced in India and it takes ages to try to enforce through the courts. —SpacemanSpiff 18:21, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know all similar deletion requests are closed by deletion. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bipasha Karan at their Reception.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alia Bhatt in Bikini from Shaandar.jpg, and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jacqueline Fernandez at Gillette Mach3 India Gaming Championship 2010.jpg. I do not understand the reason why only this deletion request is left.--Y.haruo (talk) 13:06, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:09, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die Rechte liegen vermutlich bei Nici. Xocolatl (talk) 13:47, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also ich denke mal wir müssen das nicht löschen da wir hier viele Maskottchen haben die ähnlich aussehen und auch keine freigabe haben.--Sanandros (talk) 13:16, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 22:11, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image. The image was probably taken from here Wikicology (talk) 12:35, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Antony P desmond wrote: I uploaded this post and has no fundament to be deleted.

All the informations and pictures belong to Nowartis™ which I am the founder and ceo. Nowartis™ represents legally all materials related to Pedro Miguell so all the rights of any material are reserved by us and we kindly share them in Wikipedia. Please do not delete a valid post of an artist that is clearly ascending in the music world. We also kindly note that all the references confirm the information contained.

Best and kindest regards Antony P desmond Ceo nowartis™

@Antonypdesmond: Would you please review Commons:OTRS and send a permission email to the identified email address. If you are going to be uploading similar photos you should be able to align the account with the site to enable similar permissions where the photos are within Commons:Scope.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:22, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:07, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrightvermerk im Bild passt nicht zur freien Lizenz Alnilam (talk) 14:26, 24 July 2016 (UTC) welche Lizenz ist von Nöten damit es passt? Ist bei Wikipedia etwas verwirrend. Ich habe die Erlaubnis vom Verband der deutschen Diätassistenten, dass ich das Schaubild benutzen darf.[reply]

Das Problem liegt darin, dass auf dem Bild steht, dass ein Nachdruck nur mit Genehmigung des Verbandes gestattet ist, du es aber unter freie Lizenz gestellt hast, also jeder das Bild für alles verwenden kann. Dass der Verband die Genehmigung dafür erteilt hat, ist nicht erkennbar. Am besten schaust du hier nach, wie du eine Genehmigung erreichen kannst. Falls das Bild inzwischen gelöscht werden sollte, ist das nicht schlimm, es kann dann wiederhergestellt werden. Allerdings denke ich, dass es sinnvoll wäre, dann den Nachdrucksvermerk zu entfernen. Herzliche Grüße --Alnilam (talk) 12:25, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Das hat keien Schöpfungshöhe.--Sanandros (talk) 13:20, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 20:08, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Queniqueo (2) (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIO massif. Collection disparate, comme on peu le voir ici de photos d'évêques et de blasons probablement trouvées ailleurs. Voir aussi Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Queniqueo comme antécédent. Les mêmes arguments s'appliquent (images découpées de qualité médiocre, pas de métadonnées, aspects très divers, "travail personnel" peu probable en un laps de temps aussi court). Ici une (mauvaise) copie de ceci comme indiqué  ; là un exemple d'emprunt. Voilà un fichier qui avait déjà été supprimé en juin dernier puis a été recréé. Et en voici un où le téléverseur admet qu'il la prise ici, un autre exemple encore avec ce fichier pioché sur cette page. Ces deux logos ne sont très vraisemblablement pas importables sur Commons etc.

Fichiers concernés : tous les imports de l'utilisateur. --Pitthée (talk) 16:48, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no files mentioned. --Jcb (talk) 20:26, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no direct sources given, just general website links INeverCry 23:51, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do u think that's copyrightable?--Sanandros (talk) 13:24, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - above TOO. --Jcb (talk) 20:08, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded twice (see thumb|Kettenhäuser Chen Kuen Lee Pjt56 (talk) 12:51, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

uploaded twice (see CKLee Stuttgart 6.jpg) Pjt56 (talk) 12:52, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: ok. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:40, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:40, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:40, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:40, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]