Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/07/22

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 22nd, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - it's a non-free game cover. AmaryllisGardener talk 00:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Josve05a (talk) 16:58, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO, screenshots with images from various applications. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:46, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; No evidence of the uploader being the copyright owner of the photograph or elements in the application. --Josve05a (talk) 17:01, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright issue Mangaka lam (talk) 15:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Josve05a (talk) 17:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://wiki.nuwm.edu.ua/images/5/5c/958.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:34, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.posterua.com/posters_list.html Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:52, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:47, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.posterua.com/posters_list.html Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:48, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:49, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicateof File:Landhausplatz_32717.jpg Simon04 (talk) 20:43, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request for file uploaded today. --INeverCry 20:57, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It doesnt look like own work. Main image found in several websites. It's a recreation with copyvios. ~AntanO4task (talk) 15:53, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It doesnt look like own work. Main image found in several websites. It's a recreation with copyvios. ~AntanO4task (talk) 15:53, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FC logo is copyrighted and does not have a free license GAndy (talk) 09:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Josve05a (talk) 14:14, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FC logo is copyrighted and does not have a free license GAndy (talk) 09:46, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Josve05a (talk) 14:14, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is claiming that he is the subject of the photo. It clearly isn't a selfie, and the image appears to be a scan of a photo or magazine, so the uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder as claimed. Whpq (talk) 21:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio/sock upload. --INeverCry 19:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Antidotumrec (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, found elsewhere on the web.

Gunnex (talk) 06:51, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Obvious copyright infringement. --Masur (talk) 11:34, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Szm120 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

New sock of globally locked user Szm020730, hoaxes, used for disruptive edits on multiple wikis

Ks [在这里找到答案] 13:51, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, per nom.--Stang 09:44, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 19:19, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by this vandal. Hoax. Ks [在这里找到答案] 14:36, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 19:22, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I accidentally uploaded this image and do not want it posted. I am the uploader of the photograph and was just trying to see how the program worked and do not consent to any use of the photograph. Shelbybruce9 (talk) 19:21, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request on upload day. --JuTa 23:42, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PDF document of unknown provenance, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:47, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Platonides: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Geometric mistake and unused, replaceable by File:PSC-co-CS2.png by same uploader. DMacks (talk) 22:34, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 08:06, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture used on an attack page set for deletion The Colour in Anything (talk) 01:19, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has been around since at least 2015, please see second row from bottom on right side at http://influence-asia.com/id-nominees Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:பதிற்றுப்பத்து-சுடர்வீ வேங்கை.pdf Info-farmer (talk) 01:22, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Whatever this image portrays, I am unable to understand. Not realistically useful for any educational purpose. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:24, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No sources provided for this very tiny collage of two images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:27, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCREENSHOT from mobile phone, contains images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:28, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused image of three people with a saxaphone. No indication of user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:32, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some kind of poster or album cover with no indication of user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:34, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alanpeters96 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these images which include a newspaper article (with two photographs also repeated here). None of the images have metadata, variable sizes, etc. But one subject.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:36, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIOs. No indicaiton of user's ow work on this group of images obviously culled from a variety of sources without attribution.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:37, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ramon Prandelli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on this undersized and overprocessed gallery of images of people.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:38, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Melixnakas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these pageant photos, more likely - given the sizes - to be copied from unattributed sources.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Melixnakas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:Cours complet d'interaction rayonnements matière condensée.pdf

PDF document of unknown provenance, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:47, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confirmation that this image is in the public domain. Closest we have is a media site that says Usage Restrictions: None. That isn't a copyright license, and it isn't even from an official source. Next step would be to secure email verification of author permission (OTRS) czar 01:48, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly unlikely to be own work, but if the subject lived to the 1960s the photographer certainly could have as well. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:48, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In the source video, the image is used as a static image for some audio. There is no confirmation that this photo originates with the YouTube uploader and since a higher res version is available on another website, there are reasons to doubt that the YouTube uploader is the photo's author and thus the party eligible to release the rights under a free license. czar 01:52, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is claimed to be 1950, but from internal details is unlikely to be from that date. Notice the woman's glasses & shoes, the men's wide base/small knot long ties, the over weight condition of three of the four subjects, and so on. I think this is some kind of misdated or hoax image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:53, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work, on a subject who died in 1992 and a photo dated 8 June 2016. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:54, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fersoft2015 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, Commons is not a personal photographic album for party shots and personal images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:55, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by The Impulses (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs. Band spam.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:56, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Claudeoussou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Neither of these images was self-taken but claimed as own work by an account name nearly same as subject of both photos.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:58, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All this images are mine and was taken by me. I can prouve it if you need!


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

notice over printing in lower right corner shows true soure. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:59, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PDF document with creation logos on the cover, claimed as own work by the uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:59, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this group shot of people. Unused image, seems more personal than encylopedic in nature. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:00, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque a foto foi modificada para vandalizar o artigo. Red Domino (talk) 03:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Text image George Chernilevsky talk 05:09, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Text image George Chernilevsky talk 05:11, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Promo? George Chernilevsky talk 05:13, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of file:Mario-Tijssen.jpg Dinosaur918 (talk) 21:00, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Dinosaur918: Please use {{Duplicate}} in the future... it's a speedy deletion template, and easier to close correctly. Thanks. Reventtalk

Deleted: and redirected. --Reventtalk 19:16, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of file:Mario-Tijssen.jpg Dinosaur918 (talk) 21:00, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --Reventtalk 19:15, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False sourcing. Uploader doesn't own the copyright, the crown of Spain does. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:34, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE jdx Re: 03:47, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No need for my picture. Wyskoj (talk) 04:01, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work of a trophy, no permission Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:23, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map belong to the Gulf/2000 Project. It is not free. Farhad.2119 (talk) 04:27, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Promotional George Chernilevsky talk 05:15, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

found elsewhere on web with copyright http://www.cartesfrance.fr/carte-france-ville/17486_La%20Bree-les-Bains.html Dacoucou (talk) 05:21, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rhea Sivi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:00, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rhea Sivi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Promotional only, no educational purpose. Not used.

George Chernilevsky talk 05:21, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose. Not used. George Chernilevsky talk 05:22, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It shows erection, pornography, 79.47.29.241 05:38, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No reason for deletion, however, it's of very low quality. --Achim (talk) 21:20, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It adds nothing of value to the project. We can absolutely do without it. HandsomeFella (talk) 19:59, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PENIS. --INeverCry 00:17, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It shows an erection, it doesn't belong to naturism category, it shows even greetings 79.47.29.241 05:42, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PENIS. --INeverCry 00:17, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MotorsportFan99 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, found elsewhere on the web. Uploaded since 13.07.2016.

Gunnex (talk) 06:40, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted product packaging. Kelly (talk) 06:49, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Which of the two products? Where did you see that the packaging was copyrighted? --E4024 (talk) 06:52, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
See COM:PACKAGING. Kelly (talk) 07:48, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The Turkish Cypriot Hellim/Halloumi is there to show people how to be moderate, positive and constructive, by using the two names of a local product. --E4024 (talk) 11:28, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted product packaging. Kelly (talk) 06:50, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A discussion at Village Pump suggested that this is a copy of a modern souvenir. It's probably copyrightable, even if it's inspired by ancient works. --ghouston (talk) 07:11, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Heycharchar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent exif, also per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook + 5x newspaper scans/screenshots, needing multiple permissions. Uploaded since 01.07.2016 as promo material for en:Draft:Jeepito

Gunnex (talk) 07:14, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted magazine cover. MKFI (talk) 07:38, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Naughtyrajat13 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, previous publications found elsewhere, watermarks, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 08:28, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dailymusicupdates (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 08:31, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. If IN scope needs permission from artist "Carlos dos Santos" via http://carlosdossantos.pt/pt/Sobre-Mim/ (© 2016 Carlos dos Santos - Artista Plástico) = http://carlosdossantos.pt/gallery_gen/2cb36191e848c228302967565c47c66b_fancybox.jpg (identical exif & file name). Btw, uploaded by the webdesigner of above page. Gunnex (talk) 08:53, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted product packaging. Kelly (talk) 08:54, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong file type Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 08:59, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asshhisshh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope - Commons is not Flickr. Selfies by non-notable student, article twice deleted at en:Ashish puri

JohnCD (talk) 09:16, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnessacary redirect Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 09:24, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eduar cuevas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, mysteriously watermarked, can be found earlier on web, also per FBMD... or * grabbed from Facebook, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Eduar cuevas (serial copyright violator: file cropper, social media grabber, etc.). Uploaded since 31.01.2013 for Colombian municipalities (and related eswiki entries), Historical photos and official symbols may be in public domain by other means but relevant info (proper author/date of creation or first disclosure/country of creation information) must be provided to determine copyrights status.

Gunnex (talk) 09:27, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eduar cuevas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Highly unlikely to be own works because:

  • User has a long history of copyright violations, see their talk page
  • Almost all images contain Facebook or other social media metadata identifying string in EXIF fields
  • All of low, non-original camera resolution and lacking original camera EXIF
  • Many with lazy, uncaring filenames (including others not in this nomination but uploaded at the same time) indicating the user likely saved them from the internet with little care for their source information
Files

seb26 (talk) 14:49, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Eduar cuevas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User blocked for copyright violations. Small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 13:23, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 09:30, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry 2x speedy deleted, user indef blocked at enwiki. If IN scope needs permision per exif (doubtful if really the copyright owner). Gunnex (talk) 09:32, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope (Youtube channel spam): Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Pobadly derived from elsewhere copyrighted material Gunnex (talk) 09:35, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality personal photo of unidentified subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 09:38, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality personal photo of unidentified subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 09:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality personal photo of unidentified subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 09:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 09:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded by 1-upload user Gidoneli (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log on 18.07.2016 the photo was already published via http://www.reddiam.com/93-83.76ct-Fancy-Intense-Yellow-Diamond-On-Sale-At-Reddiam.com.aspx (Copyright 2011 RedDiam All rights reserved) = http://www.reddiam.com/diamonds_in.aspx?id=2187 (with a javascript broken gallery) = (340 px) http://www.reddiam.com/userfiles/image/ArticleImages/A-NOV-3_2.jpg (last modified: 2013, identical exif), needing further details/permission. Gunnex (talk) 09:42, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rizel bautista (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader didn't done anything but promote herself in Wikipedia. Out of project scope.

Poké95 10:12, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dark and blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 10:46, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted game, not own work Bultro (talk) 11:27, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, and image is tagged as CC-BY-SA-4. Image is from one of the slides at http://3ekrafinas.eu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=456:2016-01-03-01-22-48&catid=123&Itemid=1019 Gts-tg (talk) 11:29, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is quite simple, maybe below the threshold of orginality (few arrows and boxes with letters, following the layout of the greek educational system). --C messier (talk) 11:40, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It is a simple diagram indeed, and a useful one. I am not feeling very confident about the concept of the threshold of originality (in general) but this could be taken into account. There are 2 major concerns that I still have to mention however, 1) In case the image stays under the threshold rules it should be as Public Domain instead of CC-BY-SA, 2) The uploader has uploaded several other files that are in copyright breach (and I do not think the threshold applies there) so in other words if the image stays it should not act as an encouragement for the uploader to continue this practice. Gts-tg (talk) 11:51, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PRP. --INeverCry 00:27, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, and image is tagged as CC-BY-SA-4. File is from http://www.eoppep.gr/teens/index.php/spoudes_meta_to_lykeio/26-thematikoi_katalogoi/29-how_to_uni_tei Gts-tg (talk) 11:31, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP. --INeverCry 00:27, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my own work and want to replace this with another image that is why it needs to be deleted here so that I can replace it. Diyar Mohammed Photography (talk) 11:38, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:25, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to Commons:Deletion requests/File:'73 Chevrolet Caprice Convertible (Street Festival '16).jpg, this is a very low quality smartphone image. While it appears to be the only image of the subject (#), its in-scope educational usability is open to question given its blurriness and I'm concerned that by accepting poor images of this quality we're giving the impression that this is acceptable when I'm not sure that it is. (#) If it wasn't, I'd be much more strongly in favour of deletion. Ubcule (talk) 12:24, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bas au Belmont.jpg. Note also the standard of images in user's recent uploads, particularly those of people, which are often blurry, unusably dark (and killed by smartphone NR) or suffer horribly from colour-channel clipping in the highlights. I appreciate this user's efforts, but their (lack of) quality control is ridiculous. Ubcule (talk) 12:36, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Amy Matysio au Comiccon de Montréal 2016.jpg. I had my doubts about whether even the (current) tidied-up version of this image was acceptable at the time- the original is utterly dire. I'm also not happy giving the impression that this sort of thing is acceptable, given that Bull-Doser has well-known issues with quality control and responds only to the clearest signals (if at all) in this direction. Ubcule (talk) 12:29, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Amy Matysio au Comiccon de Montréal 2016.jpg. Note also the standard of images in user's recent uploads, particularly those of people, which are often blurry, unusably dark (and killed by smartphone NR) or suffer horribly from colour-channel clipping in the highlights. I appreciate this user's efforts, but their (lack of) quality control is ridiculous. Ubcule (talk) 12:37, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad Quality Hiddenhauser (talk) 13:11, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality; doesn't look at all as a picture taken by the author: most probably scanned from some book Ruthven (msg) 13:26, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD US URAA from 1982 Ruthven (msg) 13:55, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://borradopedia.com/images/thumb/3/36/Nicolas_Paterno_en_su_debut_con_la_Camiseta_de_Quilmes_frente_a.png/241px-Nicolas_Paterno_en_su_debut_con_la_Camiseta_de_Quilmes_frente_a.png. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 05:29, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hank200tw (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, COM:NOTSOCIAL Commons is not a social network and uploaded images COM:PS#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Sorry to have marked your photo/s for deletion, but Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album! Please read up on COM:SCOPE to find out more about what is and what isn't a file which can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. I hope you read up on all this and add some more photos of your own! The Photographer (talk) 14:21, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:28, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dj Rahul Sinha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Drawing taken from a 1963 book. Possible copyviol, in any case it is a wrong license as PD-Italy applies to non-creative works. Ruthven (msg) 14:22, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.sesmaria.org.br/Sesmaria/12quadra/coronel.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Junior7jr7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mcdmiller (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://t1.hespress.com/files/maroctelecom2_676800041.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by K1eprongbuon812 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Four manga images, obviously not own work, at least one of the sources goes to a completely different picture.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:47, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by K1eprongbuon812 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bulk DR on precautionary grounds. Most of these were transferred from other wikipedias... after checking the first ten or so, they were all apparent copyvios when uploaded to the other projects, as being available on the internet at a wide variety of locations long before uploaded. A random sampling of the others showed images taken by the uploader directly from copyrighted websites, and falsely licensed here - they are seperately marked as speedies. Other images are of service badges of Vietnamese military units, falsely claimed as US Government works.

I don't think we can trust any of this. The uploader has already had a number of files deleted as copyvios, but has not been active here since getting a final warning.

Reventtalk 15:41, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matthieu Bastien (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE. These uploads would be great on Facebook or Deviant Art but they're out of the Scope of Commons which is not for promotion. After the prior nomination I was made aware that there were more of these than I had nominated the last time.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:36, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep and restore the previously deleted files. I fail to see why and how a drawing would be less in the scope than an other type of representation, for me File:Haka Polynésie.jpg and File:USMC-04235.jpg are equally in the scope. For files like File:La Recouvrance accostant au port de l'Abers Wrach.jpg there is no other files representing this general view of the harbour ; if deleted, it would be a shame and a loss for « providing knowledge » (per SCOPE wording). COM:SCOPE doesn't say anything about drawings and as far as I know, there is no Commons policy against drawing (which furthermore are quite common on Commons). Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:52, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio, cf watermark down right, unused photo Pippobuono (talk) 14:53, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Extreme Team Wrocław (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, personal images of a sports team would be a good upload for Facebook.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:53, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Misty642 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotional uploads, Commons is not Facebook.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:59, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

idasjdnsbdkjbb 194.103.203.254 15:18, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Vandalism --jdx Re: 15:25, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:32, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an 3D object, the licence is invalid, we need the permission of the photographer! Ras67 (talk) 15:26, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PISTALIBRE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Some promotion of radio channels. Not used

George Chernilevsky talk 15:27, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Out of project scope. Some photos of non notable people. No educational purpose. Not used.

George Chernilevsky talk 15:31, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Promotional SPAM. No educational purpose. Not used. George Chernilevsky talk 15:33, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Unused personal artwork. No educational purpose. George Chernilevsky talk 15:34, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Promotional logo. No educational purpose. George Chernilevsky talk 15:37, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Unused personal artwork. No educational purpose. George Chernilevsky talk 15:37, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Decekze (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose. Not used.

George Chernilevsky talk 15:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose. Not used. George Chernilevsky talk 15:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not Maria Dolgorukova but Marfa Matveevna. False source, false creator and false licence! Ras67 (talk) 15:43, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pdf vervangen voor jpg Haagschebluf (talk) 15:52, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ramganesh 8 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non education purpose.

~AntanO4task (talk) 15:57, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dwaraka King (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non educational purpose

~AntanO4task (talk) 15:57, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete — personal request Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 16:01, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, photoshopped. Uploaded by 1-upload user Mizan-terezi (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log on 18.07.2016. Gunnex (talk) 16:06, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FranXBSC (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, found elsewhere on the web (several football club logos), per COM:PRP, considering User talk:FranXBSC. See also user related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:EMELEC CS.png. Some of them may be in public domain by other reasons but relevant info must be provided.

Gunnex (talk) 16:12, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LordVoland (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, mysteriously watermarked, found elsewhere on the web, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:LordVoland (file cropper, watermark remover, Flickr grabber, etc.). Historical photos may be in public domain by other means but relevant info (proper author/date of creation or first disclosure/country of creation information) must be provided to determine copyrights status. Uploaded mostly since 03.2016 + 1x file from 2011.

Gunnex (talk) 16:32, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose. Not used. George Chernilevsky talk 16:52, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Tool low quality and no educational purpose. Not used. George Chernilevsky talk 16:53, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is claimed to be {{PD-Turkey}}, but there is no reason given why. Name and year of death of the photo's author are not given, nor is the date of creation. As the person depicted became the Turkish president in 1950 and remained in that office until 1960, it is reasonable to assume that the image dates from that period of time. Which means it is much too recent to fulfil the usual 70 years pma PD requirement and should therefore be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 16:59, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 17:26, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Movie poster of Belgium. Copyright infringement if no OTRS-ticket available. Henxter (talk) 17:30, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the copyright holder of this artwork, deletion request invalid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nieuwe haas (talk • contribs) 12:53, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously out of scope, unused selfie. 172.56.3.38 17:42, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 17:43, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted work of art; sculpture made by Elena Engelsen (1952–) Kjetil_r 17:47, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted work of art; sculpture made by Elena Engelsen (1952–). Kjetil_r 17:48, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related eswiki entry speedy deleted. If IN scope: unclear copyright status considering already circulating on web before upload in 07.2016 since (example) 2015. Gunnex (talk) 17:48, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user page. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alex Slagmolen.jpg. Subject seems to have created twice a self-promotion article on NLwikipedia (deleted). Henxter (talk) 17:52, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photomontages (people+background) of unclear copyright statut. Likely out of scope too. An unused logo (though below TOO) of questionable notability is also included in the nomination.

Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:52, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image appeared on Twitter on July 12. An OTRS ticket is required. Diannaa (talk) 18:03, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bufalà amandla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work, unclear copyright statut

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:08, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is not my own personal work. It is the work of the group I am a member of: Salvem el Turó de l'Enric. We are the owners of the pictures I have uploaded on this page.

--Bufalà amandla (talk) 19:03, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS permission required. --INeverCry 00:39, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offense please, but imho poor quality-upload, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence imho rather out of scope Wikimedia Commons. Your opinions ?? thx Roland zh (talk) 18:11, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I accept it. Delete it. I'll upload a better one if possible. It has a page in te.wiki so I uploaded it. Thanks.--Vin09 (talk) 03:59, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Publicbelgique (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots of webversions of Belgian newspapers are not "own work" media.

Henxter (talk) 18:11, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Couverture de livre, non libre - Book cover, non free -- http://iletaittemps.fr/ Habertix (talk) 18:31, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, possible copyvio. C messier (talk) 18:35, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-promoting-looking' format, but/and missing EXIF data to verify origin - your opinions? Roland zh (talk) 18:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 18:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Created a user page on Meta Nvitucci (talk) 19:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WoH62 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files stolen from the WWW (wingsofhope.ngo, ...) . COM:OTRS permission needed.

Steinsplitter (talk) 19:09, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny duplicate of File:Flag of Japan.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:14, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not from party or event category in Bollywood Hungama and so the OTRS permission does not hold Sreejith K (talk) 19:15, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not from party or event category in Bollywood Hungama and so the OTRS permission does not hold Sreejith K (talk) 19:16, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not from party or event category in Bollywood Hungama and so the OTRS permission does not hold Sreejith K (talk) 19:16, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not from party or event category in Bollywood Hungama and so the OTRS permission does not hold Sreejith K (talk) 19:16, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PRP No proof of rights to image Mike Hayes (talk) 09:37, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Reviewed. Yann (talk) 11:19, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not from party or event category in Bollywood Hungama and so the OTRS permission does not hold Sreejith K (talk) 19:16, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader has the copyright The Banner (talk) 19:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One and only upload by user? No obvious evidence of connection with author? None of the background detail you'd expect if the "Gordon Ramsay Group" themselves were releasing this under the claimed license? In its favour are the fact that there's no obvious signs of use elsewhere online and that it's not the typical web-level resolution of most copyvios.
But frankly, this is a case where we need OTRS or deletion. Ubcule (talk) 18:15, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Morocco.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of German Reich (1935–1945).svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:26, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (310x228 px) resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded in 2010 by 1-upload user Srini-ravi (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log. Eventually taken from http://www.deccanherald.com/content/45441/ashok-leyland-unveils-bus-wireless.html (same as upload day) = http://www.deccanherald.com/images/front_page_images/45441.jpg (last modified: 07.01.2010, 09:55 am) Gunnex (talk) 19:28, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded by 1-upload user Anooprhythm6030 (talk · contributions · Statistics) on 18.07.2016. Gunnex (talk) 19:29, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:SnapMeUp --> probadly scanned from a unknown/copyrighted source. Historical photos may be in public domain by other means but relevant info (proper author/date of creation or first disclosure/country of creation information) must be provided to determine copyrights status. Gunnex (talk) 20:01, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 20:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Temporary artwork fails COM:FOP#United Kingdom. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. João Justiceiro (talk) 20:11, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. João Justiceiro (talk) 20:15, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. João Justiceiro (talk) 20:15, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Global-wiki-user (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded in a row on 15.07.2016 (even with consistent exif, but mysteriously watermarked, despite a complex logo) for en:Amalthea (Technical Summit), the photos (and the logo) were all probadly published before via (example) Facebook, considering also:

Further details/permission(s) needed.

Gunnex (talk) 20:21, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Global-wiki-user

This page is for a non-profit student run Technical summit. I appreciate your concern and watermark was to give an idea of the origin(i.e. Amalthea) and Summit has that mascot, its not their logo.

For File:Amalthea logo.png it is freely available on their website. there are no copyright violations there.

If u want any specific picture changed or altered i can talk to the organisers and i can update the pictures. I am sorry if i did something wrong. I will be happy to cooperate with the proceedings.


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kingji89 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

likely not an own work see https://www.facebook.com/koeyeet/photos/a.678203082192534.1073741838.121241634555351/761085150570993/?type=3&theater

Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:37, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikidevarun (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering also User talk:Wikidevarun/logs

Gunnex (talk) 20:37, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This coat of arms is clearly supposed to be a mix of Matilda's husband's and father's, but she lived a good century before heraldry came into existence: neither William the Conqueror nor Count Baldwin V of Flanders ever used either of those coats. This file could still have been acceptable if such a reconstruction had been proposed at some point by later heraldists (i.e. attributed arms), but this does not seem to be the case: the source given for this file only shows the coat of arms of Flanders. As such, I believe this coat of arms to be pure fancy and potentially misleading, completely out of scope for Commons. Ælfgar (talk) 20:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of file:Mario-Tijssen.jpg Dinosaur918 (talk) 21:00, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Italy Elisfkc (talk) 21:07, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alvacast (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, scanned from unknown/probadly copyrighted sources. Uploaded on 18.07.2016

Gunnex (talk) 21:17, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violations Mahdi28 (talk) 21:18, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violations Mahdi28 (talk) 21:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violations Mahdi28 (talk) 21:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violations Mahdi28 (talk) 21:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image not used in any articles except for a user sandbox on enwiki. MSJapan (talk) 21:27, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image never used in an article, out of scope. MSJapan (talk) 21:28, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manna713 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used respectively uploaded by a user who didn't make real contributions, apart from the creation of the user page. Related enwiki entry (draft) deleted/declined. Probadly grabbed from Facebook.

Gunnex (talk) 21:34, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 21:50, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 22:01, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The screenshot in the middle is a proprietary software and it's therefore copyvio. — regards, Revi 22:09, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo/ Vanjagenije (talk) 23:00, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The wrong photo Hollycwhat (talk) 23:03, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Louvremuseum (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, can be found on other websites, different authors in EXIF data, etc. This need to be clarified.

Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:35, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, for me the files has to be regarded one by one, example, the "Logo Communauté de Communes de l'île d'Oléron" can't be the work of the uploader so must be sppedly deleted. Olivier LPB (talk) 15:52, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. When an uploader has uploaded copyvios and falsely claimed to be several people, there is a high probability of copyvios for all the files and it is not necessary IMO to track down individually the origin of every last file just on the slim hypothesis that he might have inserted one valid file through the lot. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:12, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

available from New York Governor's website; New York does not release its material into the public domain unlike some other state governments. There are several other images that can be used as a replacement for this one. MB298 (talk) 23:49, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Copyvio. Should be speedied. --Majora (talk) 23:53, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That is incorrect and this image is in fact open for public domain use. Not sure what you are talking about. Please replace the old image. There is no fact behind this claim whatsoever.—Preceding unsigned comment was added by 100.4.202.50 (talk) 00:06, 23 July 2016 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]
No it isn't. New York does not make things "open for public domain use." Just because it is on their state run website does not mean that you can just use it. Federal images are public domain. This is not a federal image. It is a New York State image. I have replaced all the uses of this image with her federal one. And sign your posts. --Majora (talk) 00:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Per EXIF the photographer was 'Daniel Barry', the uploader claims own work. Thus either copyvio or OTRS needed. --Achim (talk) 21:48, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File not in use on any project. MSJapan (talk) 21:33, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Amitie. --Sanandros (talk) 13:06, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. If this is actually by Hitler as the filename suggests, it is likely PD. Storkk (talk) 09:34, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My bigger concern is that is has a little perspective and I'm not sure how much perspective it's needed that the pic is above TOO.--Sanandros (talk) 12:51, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unclear source, authorship and no license. --JuTa 01:24, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nasonpearl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional uploads relating to a jewelry company. No indication of own work on any of the images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:48, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Эти изображения собственность Nasonpearl. Загружены они сюда в соответствии с правилами загрузки изображений. Эти изображения необходимы для статьи ,которая загружается. Каква причина появления запроса этих изображений на удаление?

This images are property of Nasonpearl company. This images have been uploaded according to rules of Wikimedia. This images are required for article. What is the reason for request to delete?

Because the images are not own work of the uploader but were uploaded with that claim as well as being promotional in nature. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:18, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe my current username mislead you, I've created request to change it to real name here. I agree that images of jewelry are promotional in some way, but why images of our shops and showcases and also photo of founder are in request for deletion too?

Can I re-upload this images properly or I need to wait until these will be deleted?


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:04, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source link is broken. No evidence provided that photo is in the public domain. Brianga (talk) 15:15, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The photograph is cut from the official portrait of Mike Pence as a member of the 112th congress. If you look at that portrait here: and see that I used the same reference. The fact the link is dead isn't my fault, and now that Pence is no longer a member of the U.S. Congress, his official House site no longer exists to serve as a link. It is an official portrait produced by his house office, and that link was acceptable when the file was uploaded in 2011. That should carry over here. Spartan7W (talk) 21:32, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Spartan7W: web.archive.org should have a copy of Pence's congressional page from 2011. MB298 (talk) 01:46, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:29, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this file but there is a vector version available now and this version isn't used anywhere so the deletion won't cause any problems. The font rendering in this file is very ugly, too. Nobody should ever use it so let's best delete it. Mudd1 (talk) 15:12, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Licensed by GNU FDL. Alan (talk) 10:59, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File not in use in any article, nor is the crosslinked Gnujuggler.svg, so I'm not sure why we're keeping this; previous request hinged solely on the fact that it has a compatible license. MSJapan (talk) 21:33, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Sry I don't Understand that DR.--Sanandros (talk) 13:08, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; both and svg are both able to be kept and used.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:24, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are the same files in better quality: File:Dymitr Wiśniowiecki Bajda.PNG, File:Dymitr Wiśniowiecki Bajda 1.PNG Movses (talk) 15:16, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

billinghurst, this is the same black & white version with worse resolution of File:Dymitr Wiśniowiecki Bajda 1.PNG. Please take a look and then compare these files. It is NOT a good enough. For example you can not even read any text of the file File:DYMITR JERZY WIŚNIOWIECKI KSIĄŻĘ.jpeg. In other words you can not ensure that man on this image is really Dymitr Wiśniowiecki. --Movses (talk) 21:35, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Image Resolution Type of color
File:DYMITR JERZY WIŚNIOWIECKI KSIĄŻĘ.jpeg 148x221 Grayscale
327x491 Color
You are correct, I missed the second comparative link in the line, and only saw the first for the half length image. Deleted.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:27, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:27, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient source to prove the claim that the author is unknown. Regasterios (talk) 14:31, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Magyar: A kép feltehetően 1906-ban készült. Úgy gondolom, hogy a törlésre jelölő szerkesztőnek jogában állna kinyomozni a kép szerzőjét. Nekem nem sikerült
Tambo (talk) 08:50, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:41, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pro patria semper (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Routine request for very small (low quality) files. Two of them have metadata identifying a photographer, the other two do not. There are two cameras. Both would be capable of producing better images than these.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:42, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that these files are quite junk, but it would be a pity removing the one representing MHS; this is the only illustration we currently have of him. So keep it. Pro patria semper (talk) 14:54, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"Only illustration" is not a valid reason to keep an image without proper copyright information. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:57, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ask for it directly to the Ecole des Chartes; I only cropped its files. Pro patria semper (talk) 14:58, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Ellin Beltz: for your information (according to metadatas), the 2014 photograph is of Didier Plowy, and the one of 2016 was made by Myr Muratet. Pro patria semper (talk) 15:02, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Pro patria semper: - COM:EVID requires the uploader to provide proper source and license, it's not up to Commons to contact people on your behalf. If it's this' Ecole des Chartes" at http://www.enc-sorbonne.fr/, please notice that they have "all rights reserved" at the bottom of all their pages. Thank you for the information on source and that they are not your own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:13, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Ellin Beltz: but it isn't forgotten forbidden to crop their files, is it? (The Ecole published its photograph under free license, according to this.) Then, what am I to do to indicate I'm the file cropper? File history isn't enough? Thank you very much for your help. Pro patria semper (talk) 07:28, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour, La confusion du proposeur des suppressions provient probablement de ce que, sur les pages des images recadrées, vous avez recopié intégralement les informations présentes sur les pages des fichiers d'origine. C'est compréhensible et c'est d'ailleurs ce que font plusieurs utilisateurs dans les mêmes circonstances. Toutefois, il faut garder à l'esprit que c'est vous qui rédigez la nouvelle page de description de l'image recadrée. Donc, dans cette nouvelle page que vous rédigez, lorsque vous utilisez des expressions ou des modèles comme own work ou self (qui donne le rendu «En tant que détenteur du droit d’auteur, je publie cette œuvre ...»), ces expressions à la première personne peuvent s'interpréter comme référant à vous-même, puisque c'est vous les écrivez dans cette nouvelle page. (Alors que, sur la page du fichier d'origine, elles réfèrent à l'utilisateur qui les a écrites dans la page fu fichier d'origine.) Afin d'éviter la confusion, il est donc préférable, lorsqu'on recopie ce type d'informations, de faire deux petits ajustements : 1) dans le champ «source», remplacer own work par un lien vers l'image d'origine (à cette fin, certains utilisateurs placent à cet endroit le modèle Extracted from, d'autres le placent plus bas, peu importe) et 2) dans l'indication de la licence, enlever la partie self (ou modifier le rendu du modèle self avec les paramètres disponibles, mais personnellement je préfère l'enlever et parfois ajouter le paramètre attribution directement au modèle de licence). Dans le cas présent, étant donné que vous avez bien indiqué les sources avec le modèle Extracted from, on peut comprendre la situation. Mais il est quand même préférable de faire aussi les ajustements. Par ailleurs, on peut voir que le proposeur des suppressions soulève des questions qui concernent en fait le versement des fichiers d'origine par les autres utilisateurs, plutôt que vos modifications. Il pourrait donc y avoir discussion sur les fichiers d'origine. (N.B. : Dans votre commentaire, vous vouliez probablement écrire forbidden, au lieu de forgotten.) -- Asclepias (talk) 15:33, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour Asclepias, merci beaucoup de votre commentaire. En effet, j'ai confondu ces deux termes. Pour ce qui est des fichiers, c'étaient mes premiers recadrages ; je tâcherai d'être le plus complet possible dans les métadonnées, la prochaine fois. Cdt. Pro patria semper (talk) 15:55, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellin Beltz:  ? Pro patria semper (talk) 09:19, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Pro patria semper: You must live in some world which has no sleeping or jobs. Please be more patient. Please do not email me anymore when all you are doing is bugging me to look at this deletion nomination. You are not the only person in the world. To answer your "?" as best as I can, please follow the format at File:Patrick Arabeyre.jpg for the other images sources. It's not possible to tell it came from that source from the template the way you have it now, and it is certainly not own work to crop from an image of another. BTW, the "Ecole" images have two different photographers, so that account also is using the works of others without attribution. I leave this to the closing administrator now, I am not going to make more comments, and would appreciate no more bugging. Thank you. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:30, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I only tried to solve the problems on these files (even if maybe too fast). Again, many thanks for having helped me; and good continuation. Pro patria semper (talk) 15:37, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: attribution resolved. --Jcb (talk) 16:46, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]