Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/07/02

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 2nd, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation for failing to comply with the licensing requirement to attribute the author. If we really need a mirror version of File:Bang Pa-In floating pavilion edit.jpg, it should be based on the full resolution version, and the author should be attributed. LX (talk, contribs) 00:11, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Probable copyright infringement. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 23:46, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dublette zu File:Robert Gradmann Stadtfriedhof Tübingen 2015.JPG. Beide Fotos sind von mir. Goesseln (talk) 10:58, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dublette zu Robert Gradmann Stadtfriedhof Tübingen 2015.JPG (auch von mir) Goesseln (talk) 22:07, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate file. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 23:35, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE, Commons isn't social media. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:36, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 23:45, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE, Commons isn't social media. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:37, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 23:43, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused penis and vagina image. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:38, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination | Unused image of organs which there are already several tens of thousands. Does not contribute anything of significance to the project. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 23:40, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE, Commons isn't social media. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 23:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE, Commons isn't social media. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:41, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 23:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnedded selfie -- (talk) 21:19, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 23:38, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 22:04, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 23:36, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private snap of non-notable individual; outside project scope DCB (talk) 22:27, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 23:35, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. -- Habertix (talk) 23:16, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 23:35, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

upravy doc Dušan Fajnor (talk) 15:54, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by INeverCry: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Dušan Fajnor

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Towerofcopy.jpg. Antigng (talk) 09:37, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 19:35, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of Commons' project scope. Screenshot of en:List of governors of Haryana, which is better represented using the wiki markup from that page. LX (talk, contribs) 00:19, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This file is in use on an article in Hindi Wikipedia. Not sure what their policy is on using screenshots of English pages but if that's how they like to present their list articles then this seems a probable keep. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 23:48, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use. --INeverCry 00:23, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader took a photo of copyrighted video (something like this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFQFmrWZrf8 ) NeilN (talk) 00:19, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Sierra Leone.svg. Fry1989 eh? 00:22, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gokuls02 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, the nature of the images, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 00:33, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a copyrighted photo; from http://www.bjzq.com.cn/dpfx/ShowArticle.asp?ArticleID=960987 Poem (talk) 00:45, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a copyrighted photo; from http://www.bjzq.com.cn/dpfx/ShowArticle.asp?ArticleID=960987 Poem (talk) 00:45, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Immanueldc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Metadata and file size seem not work and images are found in websites too

~AntanO4task (talk) 02:22, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of scope Kayser Ahmad (talk) 02:54, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, found on several websites, no EXIF data and permission Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:56, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image too blurry to be useful for an educational purpose. Also comes from Facebook, see metadata. Poké95 04:20, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chilaxer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, possible copyright violations, low resolutions, no EXIF data and permissions

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:28, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Le Cercueil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images in the wrong format, low quality, not cropped, not useful.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:31, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:32, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:32, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:33, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:33, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:33, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Davives (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No evidence of a free license: source website has no mention of derivatives and commercial use.

Sealle (talk) 04:41, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Davives (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Missing Permissions. Redistribution is allowed, but that's not sufficient to justify the given license. Please contact the copyright holder to send email to OTRS.

Larryasou (talk) 05:43, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:45, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unencyclopedic - blatant advertising and not archaeological Casliber (talk) 05:11, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, per Cas. There also appears to be some unfortunate image corruption around the facial area, which could tend to make this file considerably less useful to serious Turkish archaeologists. Begoon - talk 11:59, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shoaibmalhishoaibmalhi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 05:19, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. Poké95 05:26, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm quite sure Enrique didn't want to hide behing the crowd. Rehman 06:35, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwHz7FzZ32c Svkov2 (talk) 07:18, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 07:28, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from http://www.filmfare.com/media/content/2015/Jan/karanvir_1421042953_600x450.jpg OnionRing (talk) 07:44, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The state of Sikkim came into existence in 1975 and the seal adopted then, so this doesn't qualify for PD-India —SpacemanSpiff 08:24, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently it was also the symbol of the Sikkim monarchy before it became a State of India. --Superbenjamin (talk) 11:01, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, sorry, I hadn't realized that when I was searching for the history of the seal. I just saw Seal of Sikkim which makes this clear that it was the seal of the Namgyal dynasty. Can any admin close this DR as moot? cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 11:51, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. --INeverCry 00:25, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This page shouldn't be categorised Otourly (talk) 08:42, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ucdurugo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:15, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, bad quality. There is whole category:Pallas and Centaur (Botticelli). Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:02, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1910 photo is not own work. Who is real photographer and when (s)he died? Taivo (talk) 10:08, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think, that file is not needed for that. It can simply written into arcticles. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:34, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France. Benoît Prieur (d) 10:43, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: the metadata indicate the author is Markus Schreiber, Associated Press. Gyrostat (talk) 10:48, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

en:John Vaughan does not mention any Australian writers, so the photo is out of project scope. Also, this is tiny photo (202x158 pixels) without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Own work is not sure, maybe copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 10:52, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama for 2D works in UK. Kelly (talk) 11:19, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Subraminion (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Sexist, harassing, insulting image / image description. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 11:51, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1927 anonymous works and works with collective authorship are protected in Peru 70 years, until 1998 January. The file has two problems. It was not in PD in Peru on URAA date and is protected in USA until 2023 (95 years from publishing). At second, I am not sure, that the author is anonymous or collective. Taivo (talk) 12:02, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Review in 2023: if this was published in 1927, it is now Public Domain in US, but I'm not convinced at all it's an anonymous work. Not restored
Platonides (talk) 16:32, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Assuming not anonymous, undelete date updated from 2023 to 2048, based on eventual eligibility for {{PD-old-assumed}}. —RP88 (talk) 00:58, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 12:03, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope material. Glorious 93 (talk) 12:29, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-encyclopedic advertizing Mangoe (talk) 12:30, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-encyclopedic advertizing; also terrible pixelation Mangoe (talk) 12:31, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a modern sculpture in the USA, and no indication that the photographer or uploader was the sculptor. Freedom of panorama does not apply to sculptures in the USA. — SMUconlaw (talk) 12:48, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lacks of permission from the painting author Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:50, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

jsem rád,že jasem rád 195.39.29.162 13:19, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:28, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS permission from a photographer not the painter. See also this DR. 95.27.139.211 13:28, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS permission from a photographer not the painter. See also this DR. 95.27.139.211 13:29, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Elsass 1993.jpg with unwanted caption in file WolfD59 (talk) 13:29, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS permission from a photographer not the painter. See also this DR. 95.27.139.211 13:30, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS permission from a photographer not the painter. See also this DR. 95.27.139.211 13:30, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS permission from a photographer not the painter. See also this DR. 95.27.139.211 13:31, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS permission from a photographer not the painter. See also this DR. 95.27.139.211 13:32, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS permission from a photographer not the painter. See also this DR. 95.27.139.211 13:32, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS permission from a photographer not the painter. See also this DR. 95.27.139.211 13:34, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS permission from a photographer not the painter. See also this DR. 95.27.139.211 13:35, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS permission from a photographer not the painter. See also this DR. 95.27.139.211 13:36, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS permission from a photographer not the painter. See also this DR. 95.27.139.211 13:37, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS permission from a photographer not the painter. See also this DR. 95.27.139.211 13:38, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS permission from a photographer not the painter. See also this DR. 95.27.139.211 13:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS permission from a photographer not the painter. See also this DR. 95.27.139.211 13:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS permission from a photographer not the painter. See also this DR. 95.27.139.211 13:40, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS permission from a photographer not the painter. See also this DR. 95.27.139.211 13:40, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Correciontecno (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Beggins (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.programata.bg/img/gallery/event_89723.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 SupportIl s'agit d'un logo venant de Wikipedia. N'étant pas utilisé actuellement et sans source claire, je soutien la suppression !! :-)--JessNvidia970 (talk) 20:29, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://maseeh.usc.edu/assets/001/96618.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 14:18, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lucy Ng (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart and diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File Corrupt Xavier121 14:28, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ElenaKozitsina (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused promotional documents and trivial logo of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of documents.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vincent rondelaud (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gldiego (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of questionable notability and Unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Junohealthcare (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Documents of corporations of questionable notability. Looks like used for self-promotion. Web links should more then enough

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Musa1888 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://houseofgriffin.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ABOUT-MUIDS-2.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/photo/18908449.cms. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://iapl-2011-congress.com/Speakers/Taruffoscale.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work and certainly not taken on 2016-06-02 Magnus (talk) 14:49, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per the previous DR. The artwork is still copyrighted and COM:FOP#Japan doesn't allow such artworks. Yasu (talk) 14:56, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry! I didn't pay attention to change the lower-case "m" to a upper-case "M". I made a new one with the right title here: Category:Views from the observation tower of Aviation museum.--Liji (talk) 15:45, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright to Shikhar Gupta Gyrostat (talk) 15:52, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 15:55, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

include

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source:http://saoonline.vn/ngoi-sao/dien-vien-kim-khanh-nguoi-yeu-toan-tre-hon-toi-115661.html AlleinStein (talk) 15:55, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicated version of default Commons Greece's map. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:06, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicated version of still existing higher resolution flag of the Municipality of Salonica. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:07, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicated low resolution of still existing Roman Empire svg map. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:07, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicated low resolution of still existing Byzantine Empire svg map. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:08, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source:https://www.baoquangninh.com.vn/dataimages/201304/original/images673000_a3_T34.jpg AlleinStein (talk) 16:09, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source:https://www.baoquangninh.com.vn/dataimages/201304/original/images672999_a2_T34.jpg AlleinStein (talk) 16:10, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 16:22, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project + mass uploadSakhalinio (talk) 16:24, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

include

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Why is observation spelt with an upper case "O" ? From what I know, "Views from Observation tower of Aviation museum" usually use the definite article "the". I made a new one with the right title here: Category:Views from the observation tower of Aviation museum.--Liji (talk) 16:27, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 16:30, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete file Dušan Fajnor (talk) 16:37, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Schluesselmax (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 17:00, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright photo, screenshot from internet Sakhalinio (talk) 17:24, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

include

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 17:27, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright newspaper page. Sakhalinio (talk) 17:37, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright newspaper page Sakhalinio (talk) 17:37, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright newspaper page Sakhalinio (talk) 17:37, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

BH license applies only for images listed under 'Parties and events'. Vensatry (Ping me) 17:55, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

BH license applies only for images listed under 'Parties and events'. Vensatry (Ping me) 17:55, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии-кадр из неизвестного фильма (не указано участником, загрузившим файл). Авторские права на фильма принадлежат их создателям. Dogad75 (talk) 18:01, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Кадр из фильма «Когда пробуждаются мёртвые» 1926 года выпуска, СССР. Находится в общественно достояниии {{PD-Russia}}. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 18:43, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --INeverCry 00:42, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии-кадр из неизвестного фильма (не указано участником, загрузившим файл). Авторские права на фильма принадлежат их создателям. Dogad75 (talk) 18:02, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Кадр из фильма «Когда пробуждаются мёртвые» 1926 года выпуска, СССР. Находится в общественно достояниии {{PD-Russia}}. С уважением,

Kept: withdrawn. --INeverCry 00:42, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии-кадр из неизвестного фильма (не указано участником, загрузившим файл). Авторские права на фильма принадлежат их создателям. Dogad75 (talk) 18:03, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Кадр из фильма «Когда пробуждаются мёртвые» 1926 года выпуска, СССР. Находится в общественно достояниии {{PD-Russia}}. С уважением,

Kept: withdrawn. --INeverCry 00:42, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused crop of File:Toni_Kroos_-_CdR_-_RM_v_ATL_(cropped).jpg. If it were ever needed, we have the larger version. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:04, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

German stamps especially those which were printed since 1995 aren't automatically in the public domain. The pictures or photos shown on these stamps are all made or edited by de:Gerd Aretz who died in 2009, so his works won't come into public domain before 2080.

Correlatio (talk) 20:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PS:File:Stamp Germany 2000 MiNr2093 Keine Gewalt Frauen.jpg was not made or edited by Gerd Aretz, but is very likely copyrighted, too. --Correlatio (talk) 20:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The logo in File:Stamp Germany 2000 MiNr2087 AD 2000.jpg was not designed by Gerd Aretz, his contribution to the stamp is {{PD-ineligible}} in my humble opinion. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 09:24, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
PPS: I've forgotten File:Thomas Dehler (timbre allemand).jpg it is the same stamp as File:DPAG-1997-ThomasDehler.jpg. --Correlatio (talk) 16:15, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:25, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/German stamps review, as Gerd Aretz died in 2009.

— Racconish ☎ 18:04, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/German stamps review, as Gerd Aretz died in 2009.

— Racconish ☎ 18:06, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused crop from File:Giroud celebrates with Cazorla (15801576443).jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unneeded duplicate (claimed to be a crop) of File:Alexis Sanchez parade.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused crop from File:Monaco 2015 podium.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo, taken from a Dutch National Archive website, is claimed to be under a CC license. But while there are CC licensed photos at the website, I do not see any CC mark on the source page [1] of this particular photo, so I must assume the image is not CC licensed. It should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 18:20, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused notable picture Sakhalinio (talk) 18:23, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gilles Perez is born in 1954. Copyright violation. 90.43.31.63 18:24, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was taken from a website which has no further information about the photo's author, the time of creation etc., nothing. Yet it is claimed to be PD-BritishGov. I don't see anything to back up that claim; the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 18:25, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken from here, claimed to be PD-USGov-Congress.

There is not enough information there to determine if that license is correct, so the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 18:33, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a selfie, but appears to be the uploader in the image, needs permission from the photographer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sanch684 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This is a routine request for information about very small, low quality images with no metadata uploaded as user's own work but with no indication thereof.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken from a webiste, claimed to be PD-USGov-Congress. There is not enough information there to determine if that license is correct, so the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 18:35, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this blurry scan of an older photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:36, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this older studio portrait. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hakandp2000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these images of a juggler from the 1950s.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken from here via another website, claimed to be PD-USGov-Congress. There is not enough information there to determine if that license is correct, so the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 18:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PDF documents are out of COM:SCOPE and this one also contains unattributed photographs without permission. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE, Commons isn't social media. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE, Commons isn't social media. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:47, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work, no metadata, odd size and strange title. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:48, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE, Commons isn't social media. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:48, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A cropped version of this image appears on the team page http://www.france-waterpolo.fr/actualites/lequipe-de-france-vue-de-ses-capitaines, this one was uploaded with no source, no description, no author and no metadata. Suggests COM:COPYVIO and is user's only upload. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:50, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is from the "PUG LUST" series of internet artworks, which can be seen all over the in Internet including teeshirts (http://rlv.zcache.com.au/wedding_day_pug_pullover_sweatshirts-r389640e689aa4bfaa514f7f7d3e4b913_wio5s_324.jpg) and phone covers (http://rlv.zcache.com/wedding_day_pug_iphone_se_5_5s_case-rc3fb5f3448c7460fa71fb949c6ce5b3a_80cs8_8byvr_324.jpg) and so on. Definitely not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe I have seen this image on Commons and deleted previously, I think it was labeled "Bandspam" the last time and still is. It's 960 X 720 px, Facebook size, and has the traditional FBMD metadata. I am concerned however because I am very sure I have seen this exact image before. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:57, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From the talk page
I have permission to use this from the artist and label do not delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elephantine~enwiki (talk • contribs) 18:49, 06 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Elephantine~enwiki Please have the copyright holder follow the simple process at COM:OTRS. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:43, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE, Commons isn't social media. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A round crop of this image appears at http://travxp.com/2016/06/16/michael-christopher-brown-2/, credited " Photo by Elena Spirina." I don't see any indication that the small version uploaded to commons was uploaded by Ms. Spirina, COM:OTRS is needed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused doodle art on a map, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:02, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yorùbá: Ellin Beltz
yep; I've uploaded an updated version. But "doodle art"? Joshua Jonathan (talk) 20:03, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
NB: there's also File:R1a1a (Underhill 2010 and 2014), Iranian farmers (Lazaridis 2016), Yamna people (Jones 2015), Corded Ware (Haak 2015), Andronovo (Allentoft 2015), lactose (Gallego Romero 2011).jpg; that one can be deleted too. Joshua Jonathan (talk) 20:04, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the tanker comes from File:Supertanker AbQaiq.jpg, I don't see a source for the sockpuppets, and since none of the images in this composite are attributed, the file is nominated for deletion, as it is not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:05, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellin Beltz: no idea anymore where the sockpuppets came from, though I guess I copied them from Wikipedia. I've used it as a joke for an editor who hunted socks - and turned out to be a sockpuppeteer himself... Joshua Jonathan (talk) 20:01, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No, I checked my computer; one of the files is "90px-SockPuppet." it's not at Commons, so I must have copied it from the web. So, this one too, go ahead... Joshua Jonathan (talk) 20:14, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, personal unused. Steinsplitter (talk) 19:05, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of who did the art, how old it is, where it actually is, but it is certainly not the uploader's own work, and the photo is really small too. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:06, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellin Beltz: correct; I used a picture from the web. I visited the chapel a couple of years ago, and was deeply impressed by the statue (my wife found it a horrible statue...). I wanted to use it at my userpage, because I really love. But I understand, so go ahead, and delete it. Joshua Jonathan (talk) 19:59, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gonzaargento

[edit]

These are pictures of Argentine rock bands uploaded by a user who according to his user page in Spanish wikipedia is 20 years old (who will turn 21 next year, [2]). In 1999, the year of the performance seen in file:Viejas Locas en Obras.jpg, Gonzaargento was about three years of age and he was about four years old when File:Viejas Locas con Pappo.jpg was taken. All the images listed are marked as own work. This is ... not really plausible. Asked about this very case this was his reaction.

Some of the images listed might in fact be Gonzaargento's own work, but certainly not all. In any case, it's his task now to convince us. --→ «« Man77 »» [de] 19:06, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP. --INeverCry 00:52, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tn0777 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs. While the iPhone photos which were used to duplicate these previously existing photos might be the own work of the uploader, none of the depicted images are. Many are obviously rephotographed from half-toned printed originals, others appear to be from the soft-focus of film copies.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission was found at the website given, and "Slava Lessy's team" is not the uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lxn810517 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Improbable claims of own work on these architectural renderings and 3D drawings. At least two have overprinting which shows the actual source.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:17, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ReadyViews (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:ADVERTISEMENT, this is advertising cellphones, or some cellphone service.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:18, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ReadyViews (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Also possibly COM:DW.

Poké95 12:04, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ramesh050998 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear descriptions ; unknown locations ; unknown genus and species of plants and insects : so out of project scope because no educational usefulness

Tangopaso (talk) 19:18, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ramesh050998 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear descriptions ; Unknown locations ; Unknown genus and species of plants and insects : so out of project scope because no educational usefulness

Tangopaso (talk) 19:23, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did not included in the deletion request lists some photos where I identified the location (example : File:Silverfalls.jpg) or the plant (File:Plantts.jpg). I apologize for my double DR (I dont know how to cancel the first one without explanations). --Tangopaso (talk) 19:29, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Superbrain.jr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own work, Three types of cameras on four pictures, no cameras on the rest. One is a newspaper. One has overprinting from another website and four are facebook sized.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:19, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Two nearly identical images from same uploader, see also File:VLADAN in Peter Karl's Studio 2.jpg. There is no indication of user's own work on either one of these pictures and uploader had uploaded several images from Mr. Vladan's website to Commons. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:26, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This small size, low quality image contains no indication of user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:26, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused text only file. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:27, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image with no useful exif data, probable non-free media. Epsilon Tauri (talk) 19:28, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, see http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF03048193#page-1 Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:28, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Faridahmadi.itp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that uploader created any of these images of prominent individuals, they look more like a series of webcaptures.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:30, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rupali.talan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs. Obvious screencaptures, not own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:31, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alok Akka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

None of these images appear to have been created by uploader, one is a map, one is a fan of money, one is a book cover, and another is a 1977 poster.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:31, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ministre d'État (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that any of these images was created by the uploader, they include someone getting on a private jet, a photo of the US House, and three pictures of men in jackets and ties (at very small size).

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:34, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Um I never claimed to have created them, hence the use of OGL, Creative Commons, and US Government licensing for each and every single photograph. Did you even bother to look at the image information before nominating?--Ministre d'État (talk) 21:48, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In fact I would further note that the authors are respectively listed as "10 Downing Street" for the first three images, "HM Home Office" for the fourth, and "C-SPAN" for the fifth. How could this could possibly constitute myself claiming to have created the images? This nomination is frankly absurd, and it seems that you failed to give the image information even a cursory examination.--Ministre d'État (talk) 21:56, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 3 deleted, 2 kept per above. --INeverCry 00:57, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Olucasfarias (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these logos and some kind of group shot.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Giostile2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art, without COM:OTRS from the artist/s.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:40, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of an image which has been on the internet for a long time (https://s.yimg.com/uu/api/res/1.2/ahVyUUOUJdPjv127HCH2WA--/Zmk9c3RyaW07aD0xMDA7cHlvZmY9MDt3PTE3ODtzbT0xO2FwcGlkPXl0YWNoeW9u/http://media.zenfs.com/en/homerun/feed_manager_auto_publish_494/6fde774ef3b141eeb24d047ac62c4cd6) and a logo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:41, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of non-notable entity. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:42, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious rephotographing of artwork, unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:43, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composites require proper sourcing for all their images, this one is obviously not sourced. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:43, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of unsourced background image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:43, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is there some reason we need two ? See File:Kod Baudot..png. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:44, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TillyBGin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images, out of COM:SCOPE, Commons isn't social media.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:45, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work, particularly if the category is right. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:46, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused artwork by non-notable artist Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:47, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Improbable claim of own work on this architectural rendering. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:48, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joungok (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This gallery is of images of Jin Wang Kim... it includes photographs of him from considerable distances away, so they are not selfies. Included are a book cover which is supposed to be a "young Jin-Wang Kim, groupshots in which he's included, a television screenshot which might include him, and so on. What is missing is any indication of user's own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:53, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the halftone dotting on this image shows prior publication and calls into doubt the statement of own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:55, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook size, no information on age of painting, obviously not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:58, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clipped from something else, a book or publication perhaps, but not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:59, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:Santa Rita. Paternò.jpg which is another upload by same user. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:59, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused copy of File:P_-_Copia1.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:01, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused crop from File:P_-_Copia1.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:01, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ibinusina\ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

JPG files of documents with photos and words on them, out of COM:SCOPE and with the additional difficulty of the proper licensing of the images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:04, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ryandasissoto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on this gallery of "Mr. Gay World" photos. No camera data, some images can be found on other websites.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:05, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on these images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:14, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the logo of a performer, as seen on his CD covers and webpages, see https://new.vk.com/maxim_oleynikov Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:24, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Inoslav Bešker (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art and historical photos. I think heir's identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:09, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rheadavid123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on this gallery of diverse images, a car, two people, a tiger a page of a book and some form of artwork.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:07, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rheadavid123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are obviously not own works by the uploader. They are possibly old, but we need sources to verify that.

Stefan2 (talk) 13:25, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bimlakarakoti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional material including advertisement and cutaway rental diagrams! Out of COM:SCOPE even assuming there were no COM:COPYVIO problems.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:08, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The condition of this image would indicate it is not own work but copied from somewhere else. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:13, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:13, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE, Commons isn't social media. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:20, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this tiny image of a person playing a guitar. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:21, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal logo or drawing, no apparent educational use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:23, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE, Commons isn't social media. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:26, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative works on a poster or display, also very blurry. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:27, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

extremely blurry rephotograph of an old photo, no indication of own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:29, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The public use of this image dates back to 2008, COM:OTRS is needed, notice Facebook size and use on YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIlEMRva-qE). Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:32, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ruel Andreew Oli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images, out of COM:SCOPE, Commons isn't social media.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:33, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE, Commons isn't social media. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:35, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE, Commons isn't social media. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:35, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE, Commons isn't social media. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:35, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unneeded screenshot of a Wiki project. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:35, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE, Commons isn't social media. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:36, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE, Commons isn't social media. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:36, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a screen capture. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:37, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Doubtful this image passes copyright muster, Appears to be a digital photograph of a screen image. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 23:42, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE, Commons isn't social media. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:43, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Murugesan pandian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Murugesan pandian

Gunnex (talk) 21:51, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cannot identify airline of aircraft due to angle and poor quality, cannot see registration number PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:27, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

well, I'm not so much interested in keeping it (even if we have very few images about landing, this is one of the only 2 from in front of the plane, so I'm simply in a "why not" attitude); however the image describes how a generical plane approaches, so why should it make a difference if we knew its airline and its number? PlanespotterA320, as far as you know, do Lufthansa planes land differently from Air France ones? Now that we know that this one belongs to Ryanair, what's the informative content that we have added to a picture which is about landing and not about Ryanair? And about the registration number: which is the use we anyone could make of this information?
I'm perfectly aware this is not a beautiful pic (and believe me, the original raw file is even much worse than this edited sample), nonetheless if you are going to replace it with a better one describing the same thing, I certainly would be the first one to thank you. --g (talk) 10:43, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a Ryanair Plane. Ryanair only operate 737's at the time the photo was taken. This plane has 4 engines, unlike a 737. It obviosly an Airbus A340. Requirements for an aviation file to be posted on wikimedia require to be categorized by the airline at airport "Airline at airport: This might be inline with Category:British Airways aircraft at Zurich International Airport, Category:Royal Air Force aircraft at London Heathrow Airport. If the category doesn't exist, create it. If there are numerous files in a category, this could be further re-categorised as, for example, Category:Airbus A380 of Emirates at Sydney Airport, or even Category:Boeing 777 of British Airways on final approach at London Heathrow Airport" https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Aviation_files_(check_needed) the airline is unknown and I can't categorize it. It also must have the aircraft registration. "Aircraft registration, in the format Category:X-XXXX (aircraft), example, Category:RA-96015 (aircraft). If the registration category does not exist, create it, including at a bare minimum: Category:Aircraft by registration, Category:Aircraft registered in XXXXX, Category:Aircraft type here, Category:Aircraft operator here" --PlanespotterA320 (talk) 13:21, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ehm, if you kindly follow the link I put, you might discover that it was pointing to a different file. The link points indeed to a file in which we actually know whom the plane belongs to. But it makes no difference, it still is "a landing plane", and that's all what the picture has to tell us: "a landing plane". No matter the airline, it's "a landing plane". Just like in the case of my file: the picture answers to the question: "what does a landing plane look like?". It's not a scientific research about ACME-Airlines' landing dynamics, it merely is a picture of a generical plane half a minute before landing.
I'm glad you are experienced in categories, but maybe you are missing the point that I don't know which the airline is, and which is the registration number, so I wouldn't be able to categorize by airline; I eagerly would if I only knew but matter of fact I don't. And they are not at all essential informations for the picture to have a sense in itself: the picture is included in an article about landing, it's a sufficient information for that argument and nothing more is needed for that purpose. You say "It also must have the aircraft registration": not at all, we are not policemen checking the vehicle's documents to see whether it's stolen or not, and we are not going to fine it for speed, it's only a landing plane from a frontal perspective. And that's enough for the scope --g (talk) 14:02, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are many front view photos of Airbus A340s on final approach on Wikimedia. This photo is so low quality it hard to see what airline it is, there is no registration number as required by Wikimedia, registration number of a plane is required for proper categorization. The airplane must have the category of registration number, airline at airport, aircraft type at airport, aviation year by country (or airport). This photo is low quality and and example of multiple violations because there is not enough information to put it in further specific categories. It is silly have a low quality photo of an A340 in "Category:Airbus A340 at Fiumicino Airport" It should be able to be further categorized as Category:Airbus A340 of (airline) at Fiumicino Airport, but this information is unknown due to quality.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:11, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

as you can see in Category:Aircraft by registration, "If the registration is unknown, use other elements to categorize the photos/images/files". Registration can be unknown, then; so it is not mandatory at all (and I wonder how it could ever be). You already proposed another deletion on these basis, very recently, and maybe you haven't read yet why it was refused.
You also make a serious confusion in talking about anything "required by Wikimedia": Wikimedia Foundation, the only one "Wikimedia" which we might eventually consider here, can actually have a right to require something about the content of the Projects, but what WMF can ask for and what WMF could be interested into, is very far from these matters. The Commons' Community, instead, can require something, since it is this Community that governs the Project; but in the talk pages I have read on the point, I never ever read that the registration number is required. As usual, if you know data, you add them; if you don't know any, you can't add anything.
Yes, indeed, Cartier-Bresson would have taken a better picture, I'm pretty sure about that. And you too, I believe, you would have. But you didn't, so I was left alone to take my picture without your prior indications, and now we are here to discuss that, essentially, you don't like this pic (this is a right you have, indeed) and you are trying to find reasons to delete it in a very... "uncommon" way.
You might perhaps want to slow down a little with the words you use, first of all, and try to get a bit more acquainted with Commons' rules and guidelines, habits and conventions (i.e. Wikiquette); at least before talking about rules, violations, sillyness, and all the rest. You seem to be a potential very good user, so I would like to see you engaged in a better experience of Wikimedia Projects, which would give you a more satisfactory personal result as well as a better general quality of the cooperation. I'm thanking you in advance for the efforts you will make in this direction, which I presume is effectively the way you yourself would like to contribute with. --g (talk) 00:03, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use. --INeverCry 01:03, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.panoramio.com/photo/86848141 Bonč (talk) 23:56, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not clear that this photo from the 1970s is really the uploader's own work. I'm not saying it isn't, but hopefully this will come out in discussion. Also, the uploader uploaded it again after deletion without clarifying copyright status. Stevietheman (talk) 11:08, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 14:25, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TarotRecs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This does not make any sense, you can clearly tell those are not promotional images , they do not have a professional level and I OWN this pictures and have the rights of ALL of them TarotRecs (talk) 20:27, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Owning a print is not the same as owning the copyrights. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:44, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I do not own a PRINT, I am the LEGAL Copyright holder of all those pictures, logos and posters.TarotRecs (talk) 20:46, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, one of the pictures is titled in part "advertising image", there's the promotional intro at Category:Oz Chiri and no metadata or other indication of user's own work on these images which do not appear to be the work of a single individual. If you'd like to fill out the form at COM:OTRS, the volunteers over there will assist you with your ownership claims. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:15, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These files should not be deleted, these are not promotional pictures, these are pictures taken by the official photographer of the group, advertising as the previous user suggested IS NOT CORRECT, the picture mentioned as advertising was taken as a promotional for a company no to advertise here. This request for deletion should be cancelledSpell26 (talk) 20:07, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - no evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder. --Jcb (talk) 10:05, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


I also deleted Category:Oz Chiri per abuse as big promotional article (made by a user who is blocked indef on en:wp). --Achim (talk) 19:55, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The terms and conditions clearly don't allow commercial reuse nor derivatives http://www.gouvernement.fr/mentions-legales (english) Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:16, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conditions have changed, as the template says it was valid in 2014 for items at that time (see bottom at http://web.archive.org/web/20140325231426/http://www.gouvernement.fr/), all texts, pictures and videos were in CC BY 3.0 FR. They then changed to a non-commercial license in september 2014... (see http://www.nextinpact.com/news/90038-le-gouvernement-se-dote-d-un-nouveau-site-internet.htm) However we should remove the media use this template after this date. Prométhée (talk) 13:08, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The template describe clearly how files can be valid (between march and sept 2014). No reason to delete it. --PierreSelim (talk) 13:48, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France. Benoît Prieur (d) 10:42, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
  1. Etant l'auteur de la mise en ligne avec comme langue maternelle le français ;
  2. CiteCreation étant une institution française ;
  3. La fresque se situant en France ;
  4. Le site qui la visualise étant français ;
je vous propose de communiquer en français. D'autant que ma maitrise de l'anglais dans le domaine hypersoécialisé des licences est approximative...
Voici le copier-coller du copyright qui figure sur le site de présentation dont est issu le fichier :
"Copyright & mentions légales
Tous les textes, photos, vidéos, données, affiches, logos, marques et autres éléments reproduits sur le Site sont réservés et protégés par le droit de la propriété intellectuelle, notamment droits d'auteur, droits voisins, droits des marques et par la législation sur la protection des bases de données.
En conséquence, aucune exploitation, diffusion, reproduction, ou autre opération sur ces documents, même partielle, ne peut être faite sans l'autorisation expresse de l'auteur, conformément aux articles L 111-1, L 122-1 et L 122-4 du Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle. Seules sont autorisées les exceptions légales prévues à l'article L 122-5 du Code de la propriété intellectuelle, à savoir la représentation dans le cadre du cercle de famille, la copie privée ou le droit de courte citation (sous réserve dans ce cas que soient indiqués clairement le nom de l'auteur et la source).
Tout non respect de ces dispositions est constitutif de contrefaçon et passible à ce titre de poursuites judiciaires, et notamment de sanctions pénales."
Or :
  1. Le fichier sur Wikimedia Commons est bien issu du site de CiteCreation ; il ne s'agit pas d'une photographie d'autre origine ;
  2. Ce document a bien fait l'objet d'une demande d'autorisation à l'auteur (CiteCreation) conformément aux articles L 111-1, L 122-1 et L 122-4 du Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle (en témoigne le courier également adressé à l'OTRS) ;
  3. De surcroit, au titre de la description, le nom de l'auteur et la source sont clairement indiqués ;
  4. Dans le titre du fichier est aussi inscrit le nom de l'auteur.
Espèrant avoir ainsi répondu à toute interrogation, et restant à la disposition de tous.
--6PO 13:27, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination There is no FoP in France, so we need permission from author. Indeed, two request of permissions were sent to OTRS, however the author never answered (or the answer was never track). --PierreSelim (talk) 14:02, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mój wizerunek został tu bezprawnie użyty. Co mam przedłożyć, żeby to zdjęcie zostało natychmiast usunięte? 85.193.245.5 12:24, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. --Sealle (talk) 21:22, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On her "Find A Grave" page, there is a picture of a headstone with "Una O'Connor" in smaller lettering, above it her given name, Agnes T. McGlade" with the dates 1880-1959. I'm afraid the picture on Una's Wikipedia page is, if not fraudulent, very wrong. Shoddy work by the "Wikis Take Manhattan" group. 108.29.28.162 07:22, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment FindaGrave is at http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=pv&GRid=6598439&PIpi=7969969 Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment and why is that a reason to delete the file?--Sanandros (talk) 15:19, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. The nominator hasn't explained why the file should be deleted from Commons. Is it because the gravestone is copyrighted? Or out of scope? But the uploader did a poor job with undescriptive file names, missing descriptions and missing categories. -- Asclepias (talk) 20:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. --INeverCry 04:07, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Commonwealth of Australia http://www.defence.gov.au/Copyright.asp 124.168.233.233 14:01, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated it for deletion. I think I am wrong. NATO has uploaded it to Flickr. Australian Defence provided it to them (courtesy). --Melbguy05 (talk) 14:32, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm somehow for keeping it because it was not published on the defence.gov.au website, and so it is the first appreance publicly on Natos flickr account.--Sanandros (talk) 05:42, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --INeverCry 04:08, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file name says "cropped" but no other image was found. There is no indication of user's own work, it's a small size, low quality image of a public figure with no metadata. Also uploader's name is same as subject, which is unlikely. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:30, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - Since her English WP account was unblocked by Chaser (a member of the OTRS team) there is not much reason to believe it's not her. See this section here at ANI and maybe contact Chaser if still in doubt. As for "cropped", that's how people name images when using only a portion of an image they own. It's not always wiki jargon ;) TMCk (talk) 17:18, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I am not saying this picture isn't by Orly Taitz, what I'm saying is she didn't create the image. It has no metadata, it's not a selfie. It's very small. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:15, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Metadata may be helpful in evaluating an owner's claim but no such data doesn't invalidate it either (I usually remove them even on scans). And "no selfie"? Me wants to think (or at least hope) that one has still friends around to take ones picture nowadays. Do you believe it was "snatched" from some web content? I searched a bit but couldn't find any match nor similar image.TMCk (talk) 22:53, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe e-mail the user and ask for the information you're looking for?TMCk (talk) 22:56, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The caption says, "A photograph of a blond-haired, brown-eyed, middle-aged woman in a blue blouse speaking into a microphone." For starters, she is obviously not speaking into a microphone. --Weazie (talk) 00:39, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Guess that was my mistake. Fixed now.TMCk (talk) 00:52, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. --INeverCry 04:11, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]