Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/04/16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 16th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These derivative work of Super Mario can't be publish under a free licence without permission of Nintendo! Ras67 (talk) 12:31, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:21, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cette photo a été à jour ou remplacé autre photo sur la licence libre, Zazakely11 (talk) 09:08, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio: Copyright violation: copyvio via grabbed from [https://www.google.de/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZitHOSupAV2PV2nP_1vRYiesukJL8jJVYMAdUEUGpV5RoXkkXpdGmbrS69BuqjLSD4l274TYhETh3oHRn3Ky0bL7FyJf0u4XS9BnLzuzplYi8WaZeLYnwGskjjJcXFniihOFKXhzhKgGpDcyvNQZJw-Mvq...

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberrechtsverletzung, Bild ist laut Quelle nicht mit CC-BY-SA-4.0 lizenziert. Mario-WL (talk) 19:04, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. {{Copyvio}}. --Martin H. (talk) 12:50, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberrechtsverletzung, Bild ist laut Quelle nicht mit CC-BY-SA-4.0 lizenziert. Mario-WL (talk) 19:15, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. {{Copyvio}}. --Martin H. (talk) 12:50, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberrechtsverletzung, Bild ist laut Quelle nicht mit CC-BY-SA-4.0 lizenziert. Andere Nutzungserlaubnis von Theo Wargo/Getty Images North America sind ebenfalls nicht ersichtlich. Mario-WL (talk) 19:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. {{Copyvio}}. --Martin H. (talk) 12:51, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image-of-text replaced by TeX (thanks User:Huon for line-wrapping help!). Allows translation, reduces whitespace to match use (allows cleaner layout of target pages) DMacks (talk) 20:15, 16 April 2016 (UTC) [reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 09:46, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW INeverCry 20:13, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:49, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect conformation. Some (should be) trigonal–planar atoms are not trigonal and/or not planar; some tetrahedrals look wrong too. Have File:Sufentanil-xtal-3D-balls-A.png that is cited to reliable source. DMacks (talk) 20:20, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete indeed. --Leyo 20:48, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:49, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Datums- und Urheberangabe höchstwahrscheinlich falsch, vgl. Bild! Xocolatl (talk) 20:22, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:47, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nie und nimmer ist das von 2014! Xocolatl (talk) 20:23, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

zu dem Zeitpunkt wurde es eben aus einem alten Buch fotografiert Majo statt Senf (talk) 00:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:47, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Structural and conformational nonsense. Many incorrect atomic geometries (non-tetrahedral/non-trigonal–planar). And intended to have "hydrofluoride" salt, but illustrates with free HF rather than ammonium (covalent) with free F counterion (compare to File:Olaflur.svg). DMacks (talk) 20:25, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete indeed. --Leyo 20:47, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:46, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Conformational nonsense DMacks (talk) 20:27, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete indeed. --Leyo 20:46, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:45, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Use TeX}} image, tagged for many months. DMacks (talk) 20:42, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:43, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source and author: Luftfahrtmuseum Finowfurt. Missing COM:OTRS 77.6.11.22 20:58, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:42, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PUVIARASAN T R (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:02, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:42, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Out of project scope. -- Geagea (talk) 21:27, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:38, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Twitter bird is copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 21:50, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:37, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content, see rather small format and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 22:44, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:35, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho potentially non-free content, rather advertising, and file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 22:56, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:35, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be copyrighted work, i.e. a newspaper cover, and no evidence the uploader is the copyright holder. Cloudz679 (talk) 23:38, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:35, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW - copyrighted trophy INeverCry 19:00, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:00, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW - everything but the movie screen is in darkness INeverCry 19:05, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:00, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect conformation. Ring and all atoms directly attached to it should be coplanar, not some attached atoms tilted up or down. Have File:D-Amphetamine-3D-balls.png as a replacement. DMacks (talk) 19:27, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete indeed. --Leyo 20:51, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:59, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubts about own work. missing exif, weird titles, professional photos.

Basvb (talk) 19:45, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:59, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of background image INeverCry 19:57, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:58, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted paintings by Tang Huawei, not own work Zanhe (talk) 20:01, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:53, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted paintings by Tang Huawei, not own work Zanhe (talk) 20:01, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:53, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted paintings by Tang Huawei, not own work Zanhe (talk) 20:01, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:53, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted paintings by Tang Huawei, not own work Zanhe (talk) 20:01, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:53, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted paintings by Tang Huawei, not own work Zanhe (talk) 20:02, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:53, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maxsan7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 13:45, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: watermarked images & newspaper articles, unlikely to be own works. --Yasu (talk) 15:32, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified people. Unclear scope. Josve05a (talk) 11:15, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Didym: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by PUVIARASAN T R

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality (small, pixelated). Have many Category:Ketamine in high-quality PNG and also SVG alternatives. DMacks (talk) 09:31, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 22:23, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable person, own article deleted from Wikipedia WWGB (talk) 12:57, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 16:34, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable person, own article deleted from Wikipedia WWGB (talk) 12:59, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 16:34, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copia di Fiume di Pantalica.jpg che è nella stessa categoria Davide Mauro (talk) 06:49, 16 April 2016 (UTC) (En) copy of Fiume di Pantalica.jpg that is in the same category. --Davide Mauro (talk) 06:50, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to start a deletion request for duplicate images, just use {{duplicate|File:existing image.jpg}}. Please read Commons:Deletion requests/Speedy deletion. Cavarrone (talk) 19:38, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as redir (duplicate file). --Wdwd (talk) 19:45, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, both in format and content. Colored background and other artifacts of this being an apparent screenshot from some program interfere with reuse. But worse, actual conformation is unlikely. The ring with the oxygen would be more chairlike rather than mostly flattened, and the two attached groups are in the wrong axial vs equatorial positions on it. Category:Ketamine has higher quality 3D images using conformations cited to published X-ray data. DMacks (talk) 09:27, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 22:11, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely boat-like conformation. Category:Ketamine has chair-like forms for the structures with lit cites. DMacks (talk) 09:55, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 22:11, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect conformation. Some (should be) trigonal–planar atoms are not trigonal and/or not planar. DMacks (talk) 20:18, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete indeed. --Leyo 20:50, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 22:11, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Conformational nonsense. DMacks (talk) 20:26, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete indeed. --Leyo 20:47, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 22:11, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of claimed release at quoted source MilborneOne (talk) 20:35, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Not published under a free license. --Martin H. (talk) 21:06, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:44, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 09:26, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image cannot be considered ineligible. Andriy.v (talk) 21:26, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:05, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seemaal3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF (especially for File:Amoud.University2.jpg: per COM:PRP, considering also User talk:Seemaal3 and previous mass DR) + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 21:04, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating (per above: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF) also further uploads:

Gunnex (talk) 18:09, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Awkward geometry, low quality; replaced by File:Gamma-Hexachlorocyclohexane molecule spacefill.png and File:Gamma-Hexachlorocyclohexane molecule ball.png. Leyo 21:05, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

However, @Jynto: , the spacefill diagram of yours appears to be an unlikely conformation or different isomer, having (I'm not sure which) either with 5 axial Cl or 5 Cl cis to each other. Or at least doesn't match the "ball" one, which has geometry of 3 adjacent equatorial and various different cis/trans relationships. DMacks (talk) 21:34, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure you understand. The images I uploaded both show the same conformation as each other. The only difference is the representation of the atom sizes. They also show a different conformation (chair) to the nominated image (boat), but they are the same isomer. If you like, I can upload a version in boat conformation as well. - Jynto (talk) 17:46, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 19:31, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. Commercial film poster; no evidence that it has been released under a CC license as claimed. Huon (talk) 13:09, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:29, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete the source link does not work so there is no way to determine its copyright status - a unique working url, or OTRS verification would help if the uploader can provide one. I've checked tineye and done other searches but nothing turns up. Ww2censor (talk) 13:45, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If any particular link on the Internet ceases to function, this is not my fault. I assume, the photo can be used (and should be used, since it is unique in the Internet), until there comes a claim from the author of the photo. But there won't be any claims, because it is an amateur photo, which was posted in Facebook. I am sure the author would be glad to see his photo in Wikipedia. I do not know what OTRS is. Ybelov (talk) 10:12, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, we do expect that some links to images will die which is why we review the image to verify the copyright licence you added when you uploaded the image. If this was a Facebook page it is highly unlikely there was a statement that the image was freely licensed - most Facebook pages say nothing about copyright, so we have to assume copyright. The link provided is not to a facebook page we can access, so we cannot check the image's copyright status. And it would be very unusual for the image on Facebook to be removed within such a short time so we can't see it any more. Unfortunately it does not matter at all if the owner might or might not make any claim against us, or if he might be glad to have his image here. OTRS is the verification system we have in place for image copyright owners to confirm their copyright information and if you have contact with the copyright owner you can ask them to follow the procedure found at COM:OTRS. Ww2censor (talk) 11:30, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:31, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sayak Bepari (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:31, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nvertefeuille (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.nerac.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/MJW140623-13450746_DeCesare_LT.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. One credits Peter Morenus in the EXIF, others are lacking metadata entirely. Photographer(s) must confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:32, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JoeMonroe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional. Read promotional text of uploader at Category:Plumber dublin

Takeaway (talk) 14:40, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, spam. --Storkk (talk) 09:37, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:37, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://a.fssta.com/content/dam/fsdigital/fscom/soccer/images/2016/03/13/philly.vresize.1200.675.high.1.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violation. --Storkk (talk) 09:38, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:38, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ra3ialqassab (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs. No confidence that any of these images is the own work of the uploader. There are: a collage, several screenshots, possible artwork or images rephotographed, a media cover, images with overprinting, variable sizes, no camera data, etc.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:00, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:38, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this "poster"? Looks more like an advert for their company. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:02, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:39, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, cf watermark Pippobuono (talk) 16:38, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: photographer/copyright holder should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, cf watermark Pippobuono (talk) 16:39, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: photographer/copyright holder should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

opyvio, cf watermark Pippobuono (talk) 16:39, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: photographer/copyright holder should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, cf watermark Pippobuono (talk) 16:40, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: photographer/copyright holder should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, cf watermark Pippobuono (talk) 16:41, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: photographer/copyright holder should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, cf watermark Pippobuono (talk) 16:41, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: photographer/copyright holder should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, cf watermark Pippobuono (talk) 16:41, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: photographer/copyright holder should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, cf watermark Pippobuono (talk) 16:42, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: photographer/copyright holder should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, cf watermark Pippobuono (talk) 16:42, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: photographer/copyright holder should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:42, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, cf watermark Pippobuono (talk) 16:43, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: photographer/copyright holder should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:42, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, cf watermark Pippobuono (talk) 16:43, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: photographer/copyright holder should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:42, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, cf watermark Pippobuono (talk) 16:44, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: photographer/copyright holder should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:42, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, cf watermark Pippobuono (talk) 16:44, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: photographer/copyright holder should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:42, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, cf watermark Pippobuono (talk) 16:44, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: photographer/copyright holder should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:42, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:DW; the copyright belongs in part to Claire J. R. Colinet, who died in 1950 and whose works are not in the public domain until 2021. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:39, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:50, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:DW; the copyright belongs in part to Claire J. R. Colinet, who died in 1950 and whose works are not in the public domain until 2021. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:41, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:51, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete (I've uploaded this book by mistake). Not in use, uploader request. Thanks. Hausratte (talk) 14:33, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Hausratte: Seems like a valuable PD book... could you clarify why you would like it deleted, please? Storkk (talk) 09:36, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Storkk: The nominated file is replaced with another edition — File:Lex Salica (1906).pdf, which is in use in Latin Wikisource. 1906 book is more precise and usable than 1850 book. For example, in 1906 book articles are placed in indents while 1850 book places them in continuous line. You can keep it, but it would be just a duplicate with worse typography. Hausratte (talk) 10:05, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Hausratte: File:Lex Salica (1850).pdf seems to have ~100 pages of explanatory text; a foreword (by Grimm) and introduction (by Merkel), which are not reproduced in the Russian version. I will keep after noting the alternative versions in the file descriptions. Storkk (talk) 10:17, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as discussed. --Storkk (talk) 10:21, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 13:35, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Boazkaka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 09:45, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luis-Arrúa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. More or less a copy of his Facebook stream.

Gunnex (talk) 17:16, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Jcb. ~riley (talk) 02:02, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luis-Arrúa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personam images : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:59, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete clearly out of scope.Kathisma (talk) 01:34, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:26, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luis-Arrúa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of the project scope. Self promotion. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Luis Arrúa Trovador Uruguayo.

Edslov (talk) 00:09, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:08, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not "own work" of Vincent van Gogh. See here for the photo with higher resolution used as wall paper. Wouter (talk) 13:59, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:49, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a screenshot of a presumably non-free television broadcast. LX (talk, contribs) 14:00, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The same of course also applies to File:خميس الخنجر قبل التلميع.jpg, which the uploader added after this deletion discussion was started, in which the image has been mirrored and cropped, presumably to make the copyright infringement harder to detect. LX (talk, contribs) 10:15, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:48, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://pa.org.ua/upload/iblock/b61/b61fcca1cd081c522aad71c669bfa808.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:51, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://rogue.ph/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/KEVIN-CHERKAS.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, photographer should confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:48, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the uploader's own work. The background photo is from https://picjumbo.com/entrepreneur-working-on-his-macbook/, whose terms may not be entirely free. It's also not clear why this would be within Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 14:57, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: scope and copyright concerns. --Storkk (talk) 09:51, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matias attia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, personal images of game achievements and some paper foldings of no educational use.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:52, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:52, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description says "Previously published": www.communiTgrow.com/projects [1], there is a lear copyright notice, we don't have the permission Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:53, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - license confirmation through COM:OTRS required. --Storkk (talk) 09:53, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Iran - modern statue INeverCry 18:50, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:54, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Iran - modern statue INeverCry 18:50, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:54, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Iran - modern statue INeverCry 18:51, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:54, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Iran - modern statue INeverCry 18:52, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:54, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Iran - 2009 tower & modern statue INeverCry 18:54, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:55, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Iran - modern sculptures INeverCry 18:56, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:55, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Iran - modern statue INeverCry 18:56, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:55, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Iran - modern sculpture/s INeverCry 18:57, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:55, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Iran - modern sculptures INeverCry 18:58, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:56, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:FOP#United States Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:05, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, with maybe a different rationale. For what it's worth: "The content of all material on this web site is copyrighted by the Texas Historical Commission (THC) unless otherwise indicated. Permission to copy, distribute, or use in whole or part for any non-commercial purpose without fee is hereby granted provided that the information (files, documents, or photographs) is credited to the THC. - See more at: http://www.thc.state.tx.us/thc-copyright#sthash.tuPDn7o1.dpuf" Jonesey95 (talk) 21:06, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. I know of no exception for historical markers in Texas. Non-commercial clauses are not commons-compatible (see COM:L). --Storkk (talk) 10:01, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Named author isn't in reality the author... hilarmont \\ talk, talk, talk 21:43, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The author's name is drawn from Flickr. --Jan Polák (talk) 22:37, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You're right. But this John Lloyd hasn't any rights of the photo. The licensing on flickr isn't correct. hilarmont \\ talk, talk, talk 21:28, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Flickrwashed. Flickr description states "From my collection of auto sales literature worldwide", which is a clear admission that they are not the copyright holder. --Storkk (talk) 10:02, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Estonia (esp. indoors). Half of the picture (as referred in its name) is an artwork protected by copyright, hence by Estonian Copyright Act, it is only free for NC use. Oop (talk) 00:00, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I renamed the file and edited its description. Taivo (talk) 13:07, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: cropped version OK; Deleted problematic version. --Storkk (talk) 10:09, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A logo of not notable musical group. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:34, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and also above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:07, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vanity. Out of scope Fixertool (talk) 00:50, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:08, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW - No FoP in Iran INeverCry 01:01, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:09, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW - No FoP in Iran INeverCry 01:02, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:10, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW - the banner pic behind Rouhani takes up a large % of the frame INeverCry 01:05, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:10, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no Tasnim watermark and no Tasnim photographer credited INeverCry 01:11, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Fails {{Tasnim}} license review: listed photographer is not Tasnim staff and thus not subject to Tasnim license. Would need to be licensed and uploaded through its official source czar 02:48, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:13, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no Tasnim watermark and no Tasnim photographer credited INeverCry 01:13, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Fails {{Tasnim}} license review: listed photographer is not Tasnim staff and thus not subject to Tasnim license. Would need to be licensed and uploaded through its official source czar 02:49, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:13, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW - no FoP in Iran INeverCry 01:37, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:14, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a re-uploaded copyvio. Elvey (talk) 02:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination http://www.cayfilm.com/2015-congo-beat/. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:18, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, as there is no EXIF data, and the resolution is low. Also out of project scope. Poké95 02:47, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, FBMD in the metadata, come from facebook. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:20, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:53, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:20, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ANNVALF (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:54, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:19, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This media file may not fall within the project scope of Wikimedia Commons. All content on Wikimedia Commons must be realistically usable for an educational purpose, such as to be able to be used to illustrate the subject of an article on a Wikimedia project. For example, personal photos, unless they could possibly be used to illustrate a Wikipedia article for instance, may be considered to be out of scope.
Any content which falls outside the project scope might be nominated for deletion.

English  español  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  sicilianu  македонски  हिन्दी  മലയാളം  +/−
Senapa (talk) 04:09, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:21, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. This picture may not fall within the project scope of Wikimedia Commons Senapa (talk) 04:14, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:22, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This upload has some errors, and the current file is not going to be worked on tewikisource, so marking for deletion. Will upload a better copy in some time. రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (talk) 04:51, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've tagged it for speedy deletion for you, as you're the uploader. It'll be gone soon.--Elvey (talk) 23:26, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: done by Túrelio (see file history). Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:25, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising Image Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:22, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file related to uploader's non-notable fiction, out of project scope. Just deleted the only article using it. Kusma (talk) 05:42, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, also aboce TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:26, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small resolution Leha-11 (talk) 06:56, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope holiday picture. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:30, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small resolution Leha-11 (talk) 06:56, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope holiday picture. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:30, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small resolution Leha-11 (talk) 06:56, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope holiday picture. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:30, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small resolution Leha-11 (talk) 06:56, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope holiday picture. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:30, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small resolution Leha-11 (talk) 06:56, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope holiday picture. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:30, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small resolution Leha-11 (talk) 06:56, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope holiday picture. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:30, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small resolution Leha-11 (talk) 06:56, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope holiday picture. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:30, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small resolution Leha-11 (talk) 06:56, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope holiday picture. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:30, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small resolution Leha-11 (talk) 06:57, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope holiday picture. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small resolution Leha-11 (talk) 06:57, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope holiday picture. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 07:56, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, also unlikely to be free. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:35, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used (Wikipedia Zero upload). Gunnex (talk) 08:15, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:36, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used (Wikipedia Zero upload). Gunnex (talk) 08:24, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:37, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used (Wikipedia Zero upload). If IN scope needs permission via https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=936179463144063&set=a.383744445054237.87318.100002560556505&type=3&theater (02.2016) Gunnex (talk) 08:28, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:37, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DIGINEXT SARL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status considering screenshots (including games etc.) derived from unknown/copyrighted content via the software http://www.inscape3d.com/products (3D editor, developed by French company "DIGINEXT "). Despite of having a similar username, the inscape3d.com user is not necessarily the same person as the Commons user. A verifiable connection via COM:OTRS (or by other means) must be established. Furthermore, additional infos for the derivated content is needed. Nominating also 6 related logos.

For all: they may be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 09:08, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These derivative work of the two copyrighted characters can't be publish under a free licence without permission of Nintendo! Ras67 (talk) 12:33, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:15, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free derivative work of Yoda! Ras67 (talk) 12:39, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, derivative and too small this image is. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:15, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better version is available (see: File:10th SS Divsion Logo.svg).--Der Rationalist (talk) 11:18, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:14, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable person, own article deleted from Wikipedia WWGB (talk) 12:59, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:14, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yoda is copyrighted by Lucasfilm/Disney! The photographer has not the right to publish this under free licence. Ras67 (talk) 13:05, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:14, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted characters. Ras67 (talk) 13:08, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:14, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of Yoda, copyrighted by Lucasfilm/Disney! The photographer has not the right to publish this under free licence. Ras67 (talk) 13:10, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:14, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of Yoda, copyrighted by Lucasfilm/Disney! The photographer has not the right to publish this under free licence. Ras67 (talk) 13:11, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:14, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file: Also we have other File:Bertiebottsjellybelly.jpg, File:Bertiebotts jellybelly.jpg and File:Bertiebottsphoto.jpg with better image. SimmeD (talk) 13:33, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:13, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright concern Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 13:41, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:13, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright concern Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 13:42, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:13, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright concern Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 13:42, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:13, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright concern Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 13:42, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:12, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright concern Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 13:43, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:12, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright concern Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 13:43, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:12, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright concern Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 13:43, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:12, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MMCanada (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused map of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.=

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:28, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:10, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:10, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Monumentendienst (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused map of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:10, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www3.hcs.ohio-state.edu/turfwiki/images/thumb/0/0f/Thb5Cyclo_lurida2.jpg/200px-Thb5Cyclo_lurida2.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:09, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.orm.com.br/orm/sgportal/fotos/mario.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:09, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ananddesign (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:09, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems like Copyright violations and lots of NPOV Rogi (talk) 15:05, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:09, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture, out of project scope. Articles created by de:User:Forumlex have been deleted. Martin H. (talk) 15:07, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:09, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no encyclopedic value, useless F (talk) 15:20, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:09, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file. Big photo with camera data, maybe somebody wants to keep it as stock photo? Taivo (talk) 16:19, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unused head shot of non-notable male. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:08, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, cf watermarks Pippobuono (talk) 16:20, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:08, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Enciclopedia Izquierda Mexicana is unknown in es.wiki. Unused logos of non-notable things are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:07, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file. Taivo (talk) 16:26, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:07, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file. Taivo (talk) 16:30, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:07, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file. Taivo (talk) 16:33, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:07, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 17:06, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:07, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not sourced to a Tasnim photographer INeverCry 20:04, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Fails {{Tasnim}} license review: listed photographer is not Tasnim staff and thus not subject to Tasnim license. Would need to be licensed and uploaded through its official source (khamenei.ir) czar 02:53, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:06, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not sourced to a Tasnim photographer INeverCry 20:06, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If we can't find this image in Khamenei.ir, we must delete this.Saman-1984 (talk) 19:58, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Fails {{Tasnim}} license review: listed photographer is not Tasnim staff and thus not subject to Tasnim license. Would need to be licensed through its official source. czar 08:05, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:06, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not sourced to a Tasnim photographer INeverCry 20:07, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If we can't find this image in Khamenei.ir, we must delete this.Saman-1984 (talk) 19:58, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Fails {{Tasnim}} license review: listed photographer is not Tasnim staff and thus not subject to Tasnim license. Would need to be licensed and uploaded through its official source (khamenei.ir) czar 02:55, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:06, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not sourced to a Tasnim photographer INeverCry 20:08, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If we can't find this image in Khamenei.ir, we must delete this.Saman-1984 (talk) 19:58, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Fails {{Tasnim}} license review: listed photographer is not Tasnim staff and thus not subject to Tasnim license. Would need to be licensed and uploaded through its official source (khamenei.ir) czar 02:56, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:06, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not sourced to a Tasnim photographer INeverCry 20:12, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If we can't find this image in Khamenei.ir, we must delete this.Saman-1984 (talk) 19:57, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Fails {{Tasnim}} license review: listed photographer is not Tasnim staff and thus not subject to Tasnim license. Would need to be licensed through its official source. czar 07:10, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:06, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo is from school's website. No indication that the uploader has any right to release it under any license whatsoever. Complex enough that it's not just text and geometric shapes. http://www.averett.edu/about-us/news-events/averett-university-unveils-new-logo/ Esrever (klaT) 21:23, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am the uploader as well as the Webmaster/Graphic designer for the University. This logo was uploaded to replace the previous design on the wiki page concerning the University. My apologies if I didn't make appropriate notes concerning licensing.twdcmd 17:50, 16 April 2016 (EST)

This is a bit complicated, but I'll try to explain it in laymen's terms. The English-language Wikipedia is just one part of a broader collection of websites (the other Wikipedias in their various languages, Wikiquote, Wikisource, etc.), all hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation. This particular part of that whole enterprise, the Commons, is for free media (free as in liber, not free as in gratis). That is, by uploading something here, on the Commons, you're stating that you yourself own the rights to the image and are releasing it under a free license (like the Creative Commons licenses) or that the image is in the public domain. My guess is that while you may be the webmaster at Averett, you do not, in fact, own the rights to it and are not empowered to release the image under anything other than a standard copyright for its fair use on the English Wikipedia. Nor is the image--again, I'm guessing--in the public domain. Because of all that, my guess was that the logo is not eligible to be included here on the Commons. I have instead uploaded it to the English-language Wikipedia under an appropriate copyright license there. Make sense? Esrever (klaT) 02:03, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
perfectly, I had intended to upload to the English-language Wikipedia initially, but was not able due to the restrictions. I agree with removal on the commons now that it's available with the correct copyright. Thanks for the clarity. User:twdcmd

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:06, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has coypright problems Mhmrodrigues (talk) 21:47, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Note: not possible to have "author dead 70 years" if author also = unknown. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:05, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has coypright problems Mhmrodrigues (talk) 21:49, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Note: not possible to have "author dead 70 years" if author also = unknown. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:05, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has coypright problems Mhmrodrigues (talk) 21:49, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Note: not possible to have "author dead 70 years" if author also = unknown. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:05, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has coypright problems Mhmrodrigues (talk) 21:49, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Note: not possible to have "author dead 70 years" if author also = unknown. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:05, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has coypright problems Mhmrodrigues (talk) 21:49, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Note: not possible to have "author dead 70 years" if author also = unknown. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:05, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has coypright problems Mhmrodrigues (talk) 21:50, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Note: not possible to have "author dead 70 years" if author also = unknown. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:05, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has coypright problems Mhmrodrigues (talk) 21:51, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Note: not possible to have "author dead 70 years" if author also = unknown. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:05, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has coypright problems Mhmrodrigues (talk) 21:51, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Note: not possible to have "author dead 70 years" if author also = unknown. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:05, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has coypright problems Mhmrodrigues (talk) 21:51, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Note: not possible to have "author dead 70 years" if author also = unknown. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:05, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has coypright problems Mhmrodrigues (talk) 21:51, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Note: not possible to have "author dead 70 years" if author also = unknown. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:05, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has coypright problems Mhmrodrigues (talk) 21:52, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Note: not possible to have "author dead 70 years" if author also = unknown. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:04, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has coypright problems Mhmrodrigues (talk) 21:52, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Note: not possible to have "author dead 70 years" if author also = unknown. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:04, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has coypright problems Mhmrodrigues (talk) 21:52, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Note: not possible to have "author dead 70 years" if author also = unknown. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:04, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has coypright problems Mhmrodrigues (talk) 21:52, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Note: not possible to have "author dead 70 years" if author also = unknown. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:04, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has coypright problems Mhmrodrigues (talk) 21:53, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Note: not possible to have "author dead 70 years" if author also = unknown. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:04, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has coypright problems Mhmrodrigues (talk) 21:53, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Note: not possible to have "author dead 70 years" if author also = unknown. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:03, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has coypright problems Mhmrodrigues (talk) 21:53, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Note: not possible to have "author dead 70 years" if author also = unknown. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:03, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has coypright problems Mhmrodrigues (talk) 21:53, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Note: not possible to have "author dead 70 years" if author also = unknown. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:03, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has coypright problems Mhmrodrigues (talk) 21:53, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Note: not possible to have "author dead 70 years" if author also = unknown. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:03, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

there is no author of the image Maksmilian (talk) 01:17, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:24, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image : out pf scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:31, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:24, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS Ras67 (talk) 12:02, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted 3d object, I doubt the uploader is the copyright holder Avron (talk) 17:07, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I checked the en.wikipedia and I think, the uploader is the copyright holder. Please close the DR.--Avron (talk) 17:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 02:18, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS Ras67 (talk) 12:05, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted character. Ras67 (talk) 12:07, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted character. Ras67 (talk) 12:08, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS Ras67 (talk) 12:08, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Handball93 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

After today identifying around 12 uploads as copyvio (grabbed from different offical handball club sites etc., "using" an arsenal of different digicams) it´s difficult to believe that these remaining files would be own work: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing exif) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either. All files related to Polish handball and related players and venues. Thumbs of handball players mostly grabbed from http://mtschrzanow.net/infopage.php?id=58 (example: File:Desolm.png, uploaded 03.2013 = http://mtschrzanow.net/foto/desolm.png, last modified: 2012). File:Wągrowiec.JPG previously circulating (even in lower res) via http://www.osir.wagrowiec.eu/onas2-Obiekty_sportowe.html = http://www.osir.wagrowiec.eu/user/onas/Hala%202011/Image00001.jpg (last modified: 2011, identical exif). Some files were cropped by uploader to hide copyright origin = example: File:Desoł.jpg = cropped via http://kskrakowiak.pl/przygotowania.php = http://kskrakowiak.pl/images/zdjecia/mts/8.jpg (last modified: 2012).

Gunnex (talk) 07:43, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Handball93 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination --Krd 12:42, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Handball93 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These pictures make me feel unhappy. There are three different camera models involved, although FinePix S2950 has been used for all Megane pictures. File:Kadra MTS Chrzanów 2014.2015.jpg identifies a copyright holder and a website in the EXIF, suggesting that the files come from there. The arrangement of text and pictures in File:Megane.jpg makes me think that it looks like marketing material (and thus probably unfree).

Stefan2 (talk) 12:15, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:22, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS Ras67 (talk) 12:17, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:21, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS Ras67 (talk) 12:18, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:21, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS Ras67 (talk) 12:27, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:19, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 12:30, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:20, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These derivative work of Super Mario can't be publish under a free licence without permission of Nintendo! Ras67 (talk) 12:30, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: If this ugly draw is a DW of mario, then, delete File:Kirby creates a helper from ability (videogame gameplay).png as a DW of Kirby... --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:44, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Your case allowed fan art with commonplace pre-existing elements. Marioball.PNG is borderline, but i think the red peaked cap with the M and moustache is beyond from this. --Ras67 (talk) 03:24, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Whether or not this image is DW of Mario, as its title would indicate, is not at issue. The image is a doodle artwork drawn by a non-notable artist and not in use. Deleted for COM:SCOPE. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:21, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Post factum  Keep. It was used on my talk page and it was undeleted because that. I still want to use it because I don't see anything wrong with that, so let it be my symbol of resitance against pointless deletions. Maybe someday it will be back here, so please, count it as my arguments, if I won't be there.
    • I know that "but other pictures" isn't argument, but really, why that one hurts so much? I think it's not about picture, but uploader. You are accussing him of breaking the law. That's serious offence and I'd want to see any proof that it's derivative work of copyrighted artwork.
    • Apparently this Mario Cap logo. Or maybe it's not, but it wasn't to del req yet? Then maybe Ras67 would nominate it? I think this would be fair. If it will get deleted, I'll officially apologize Ras67 for accusations. If it will be kept, let him apologize to uploader. I understand that some of you aren't able to tell difference between trademark and copyright, but then why discuss about something you don't know about?
    • Blurry cellphone selfies of vulvas in dirty mirror are kept, because oh, they are "realistically usable for an educational purpose". Realistically this Commons rule #1 is so biased and it's used to delete pictures we don't like of pictures of uploaders we don't like - at least that's the case of almost every admin I know from closer relations including me. Who will throw the stone? But here I see it without trying hard to save picture, because it was a gift for me. I really think that. The bad point is that I don't know that for sure, because I'm not objective with myself. So let's say: Mario in culture. This picture could illustrate statement that after so many years it's still popular theme, including Internet memes. From-a Poland with-a love, Krzysiu (talk) 21:43, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • PS: Do you really think that Nintendo was the first ever to put red M in white circle? If yes, then well, I'll bang my head against the wall. If not - then Nintendo is breaking copyrights! Sell it to The Sun, eh. Krzysiu (talk) 21:53, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for any educational purpose, Commons is not a personal free web host. IllaZilla (talk) 21:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep - In use on a userpage, generally accepted that a small number of images may be kept for userspace, even if not in scope. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:12, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Seems to be contrary to COM:EDUSE. Yes, "by custom the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed", but that doesn't mean every silly thing a user draws in MS Paint. "An otherwise non-educational file does not acquire educational purpose [...] solely because it is in use on a user page." --IllaZilla (talk) 22:26, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per Mattbuck. The user that is using this image (Krzysiu) is an established user here on Commons. Images in use in a userpage are only deleted if it was uploaded and/or used by an unestablished user. If this image is deleted, then other images like this should be deleted too, like selfies which are used in a userpage of an established users. As for educational purpose, this image may show how popular Mario is in popular culture. You haven't read Krzysiu's  Keep above, have you? -- Poké95 01:13, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    I am unaware of an exception for "established users" vs. unestablished...a selfie or something that served a purpose in userspace (identifying the user) might be worth keeping, within reasonable limits of course, but this isn't Myspace circa 2005; somebody's computer doodles used to dress up their userpage serve no useful purpose to the project. Your comment about Mario's popularity is neither here nor there; this is the flagship character of one of the most popular video game companies in the world...there are bazillions of examples available to illustrate the character's popularity that are not somebody's notebook scribbles. And yes, I did read Krzysiu's comments above. Please give me the benefit of the doubt that I read the prior deletion discussions before re-nominating. The previous nomination was based on it being a derivative work, mine is based on it being useless to Commons. I did not think Krzysiu's rationale of "I like having it on my user page" was a convincing reason why Commons should host this otherwise purposeless file. --IllaZilla (talk) 05:06, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 00:40, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Safone96 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 10:11, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. If you are the photographer, please confirm by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 12:14, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Safone96 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Again, unlikely/obviously false authorship claims. Instead of commenting on the previous deletion discussion, the uploader continued to charge ahead with even more problematic uploads. Obviously, he or she either doesn't understand or doesn't care what the words "author", "own work" or "copyright holder" mean.

LX (talk, contribs) 12:30, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:18, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ticket:2016022910013461 is related to this file but does not contain any conversation regarding this file (and who authored it). As it stands we need a proper OTRS-permission. Basvb (talk) 00:42, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Taketa, could you help here? czar 01:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • The ticket is indeed not about this file. The ticket is only here to confirm the identity of the account that uploaded the file. That person has the right to this file, and since he uploaded it, that is explicit permission to use the file under the license he uploaded it with. Why do we need a better ticket Bas? Taketa (talk) 03:08, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    I might have missed that the relationship between the author of this file and the permission is this strong (don't remember exactly). Given that the ticket still only discusses permission for texts and a more explicit statement that this file is created/owned by the uploader would be welcome. I will send a follow-up email. Basvb (talk) 10:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Ok got an answer with more explicit statement that the copyright of this file is owned. Can be kept. Basvb (talk) 15:33, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: nom withdrawn. czar 04:53, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Abusing user page. Stang 07:54, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:27, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 07:56, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No apparent encylopaedic or educational value - this is just a picture of someone, somewhere in the world, looking at the camera Hchc2009 (talk) 08:47, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 08:50, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:54, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The logo does not consist of simple geometrical figures like ellipses. Taivo (talk) 16:02, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Used for a hoax artcile via en:Borussia Munchen Garybach FC Gunnex (talk) 09:19, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used (Wikipedia Zero upload). Gunnex (talk) 09:37, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you describe the file correctly? This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:38, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inside magazine is not mentioned in en.wiki. Unused logos of non-notable magazines are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:47, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality, blurry. Taivo (talk) 09:58, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gemälde urheberrechtlich geschützt. Der Freigabe müsste der Urheber, der Maler Szeczny per OTRS zustimmen. Artmax (talk) 10:02, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Categorizing lets me guess, that the photo comes from Facebook. The photo is edited, blue background is inserted. I suspect copyright violation. The photo is unused and badly categorized, maybe out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

juste a black cover, no encyclopedic value, usless F (talk) 10:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

just a black cover, useless, no encyclopedic value, etc F (talk) 10:23, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file. Taivo (talk) 10:28, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

How the file is in project scope? Google translates file description: "stress distribution in the two-way rock should be as possible. If we are to describe the simple shape of the crack rock containing gas, similar to the core structure leaves after hydraulic fracturing method applied.". Taivo (talk) 10:44, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of non-notable company (no mention in en.wiki), out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:46, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file. Taivo (talk) 10:50, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Petrus Bod is not mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in hu.wiki. I suspect, that his coat of arms is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:12, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, likely not own work, but copyvio. This is the uplaoder's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:18, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'est une photo de moi, et je n'en ai pas besoin sur internet. Dr Trompette (talk) 11:32, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright --VikiMemur (talk) 11:49, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

from http://apsnarangi.in/career Diannaa (talk) 12:00, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

transferred - date correction Jckowal (talk) 13:09, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Русский: плохое качество и "рассинхрон" звуковой дорожки. Залит новый файл English: poor quality and synchronization of audio. Uploaded a new file Frutti-mytti (talk) 17:34, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not sure, what weights heavier, the copyright of Lucasfilm/Disney and the property damage of this wall or the freedom of panorama in Spain? Ras67 (talk) 14:07, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unlike the origial file, I believe that the cropped version is not appropiate for Commons because it only represents copyrighted material. Even despite it is a poor representation of Yoda.--Coentor (talk) 16:09, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. It is not de minimis, so delete (and sorry for the inconvenience). I would add that even if it is a poor representation of Yoda, it is better than nothing. But I found something else to illustrate the article.
(PS: the original un-cropped picture must be conserved, as freedom of panorama exists in Spain, and Yoda is de minimis on that picture. Fugitron‹… ›, 04:08, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Benoît Prieur (d) 14:12, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 05:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Benoît Prieur (d) 14:15, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 05:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Knihovnadacice (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof of autorisation, the same user (Salimmohli) did a text copyvio on the French Wikipédia article Régis Juanico. VIGNERON (talk) 14:40, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confidence of user's own work in this studio portrait, probably COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:49, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arielpalioc10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs. No confidence that these images were created by uploader, one collage, one city seal and another photo, none have metadata, no indication of user's own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:51, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo of artwork on a tee-shirt, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:55, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE non-educational photo of pizza and beer. Also looks photoshopped around the beer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:56, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An almost identical logo is used here. This logo here at a minimum is a derivative work of that logo and there is no evidence the uploader is the copyright holder or has permission to relicense the logo. As for originality, that loopy icon at the top is very likely copyrightable as well. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:06, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this tiny image of a man with a backpack. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:07, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted by GEMA. 84.61.158.253 16:20, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wir lagen vor Madagaskar was composed (and likely to be published) in 1934 by w:Just Scheu (1903-1956). If the song is already in the PD, is the partiture copyrightable? --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:22, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete unsure why you think the song is PD, and this is clearly a derivative work. Category:Undelete in 2027. Storkk (talk) 13:51, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Propose we delete all the old versions (only) - malfunctioning bot? Perhaps there's a bigger problem? Elvey (talk) 16:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: (revisions) 87 revisions deleted, quite the bot malfunction. ~riley (talk) 05:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
[edit]

Full list:

The works are being republished under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 license, which means they can no longer exist in the Commons. Davykamanzitalk · contribs 22:11, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But if it is your wish, it can be deleted, there seems really not in scope. User: Perhelion 21:29, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 22:18, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ticket:2013121910006591 seems to be on a completely unrelated file, thus the OTRS-permissions seems to be invalid and this file likely just a copyvio. A check from another OTRS-volunteer is welcome. Basvb (talk) 00:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The likely copyvio might be a bit too harsh, however if there is any email permission it is not in the given ticket. A search on the file name also holds no results. Thus OTRS permission is missing. Basvb (talk) 00:24, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the orignal sent to me by Eyal Amir himself to my Email.

@קפקא, did you send permission to OTRS? czar 01:45, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:10, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not sure, what weights heavier, the copyright of Lucasfilm/Disney and the property damage of this wall or the freedom of panorama in Spain? Ras67 (talk) 14:06, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Theorically is a derivative work from Disney's/Lucasfilm intellectual property, but its also true that the Yoda depicted isn't very clearly represented. The fact that Yoda is looking at a side and half of the face is in black, I believe that could made it pass as appropiate for Commons.--Coentor (talk) 16:07, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yoda is de minimis on that picture. Freedom of panorama is O.K. in Spain ; and I do not see how the property damage argument could justify anything. So keep. Fugitron‹… ›, 04:10, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The hosting of this image can be seen as a support and approval of the wall's property damage. --Ras67 (talk) 11:47, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 09:39, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Habertix as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: Non free iamge : copy of http://gaugryfromager.fr/nos-fromages/lami-du-chambertin/ without proper authrorisation from author "Images et Associés ; Image non libre, copie de http://gaugryfromager.fr/nos-fromages/lami-du-chambertin/ sans autorisation de l'auteure "Images et Associés". Taivo (talk) 16:23, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:37, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is wrong (it goes to a different image). This is only PD in the United States if it was published somewhere without a copyright notice before 1 March 1989 and if it was first published in Italy, but no evidence of publication has been presented. Stefan4 (talk) 14:08, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:21, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A picture from 1940 dated 2015. What'so going on? Could be a scan, but we have no information on authorship. According to w:en:File:Julius Evola.jpg, it is published in various print and online sources, so it could possibly be a grabbed-from-the-Internet affair. BethNaught (talk) 06:35, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:45, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image without EXIF. Very unlikely to be own work. All other uploads, at this time, from the uploaders have been speedy deleted. Unfortunaly google search image have too much similar images to can found the source. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:58, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:45, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

just a black cover, no encyclopedic value, not used, etc F (talk) 07:55, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:02, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photograph of the coins - 3D objects - is copyrighted by the sourced website ("medieval coins"), who have not agreed to release it under a free licence Hchc2009 (talk) 08:43, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the website agreed to release the photograph of the coins under a free licence Hchc2009 (talk) 08:44, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the website agreed to release the photograph of the coins under a free licence Hchc2009 (talk) 08:44, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the website agreed to release the photograph of the coins under a free licence Hchc2009 (talk) 08:46, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Sweden for internet repositories. Ras67 (talk) 12:16, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no FoP-Sweden deletions for now. --Jcb (talk) 20:06, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt very much that these are all "own work" as claimed. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:18, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I didn't think of the copyright status of the leaflets themselves when I adjusted the image but yeah delete I guess. Might possibly fall under fair use on Wikipedia? Nizolan (talk) 23:29, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • "直接作る。"という意味は、私がこのポスターを直接作ったものがなくて、この写真を私が直接作って撮影したことを意味します。 --멍한오리 (talk) 06:01, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • 여기서 핵심은 직접 찍었느냐의 여부가 아닙니다. 상표권이나 의장권 등에 대한 권리를 지니고 있느냐에 대한 겁니다. 그리고 본인 이외에 다수가 이해할 수 없는 언어로서의 일본어가 아닌, 영어를 사용해주시기 바랍니다. The key word here isn't whether or not you take that shot yourself. I think, the problem is whether or not you have rights over the leaflets as a right to the trademark/design, etc. And please write in English language, not Japanese language that is inaccessible to other users. Thanks. --Idh0854 (talk) 07:41, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
        • Sorry. I understand. However, Japan is great country, Japanese used widely in the world. I think can be used Japanese. And this picture and similar picture exists! This is File:South Korean local elections, 2010 - Poster, Muju-Na.jpg. Therefore I think is this picture should remain. 分かりました。 すみません しかし、日本は巨大な国であり、日本語は世界各地で使われます。 高炉日本語は使用されことができます。 そしてこの写真と類似した写真もあります! ですので、私は維持に賛成します。 --멍한오리 (talk) 14:04, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I say  Keep. These posters doesn't seem to have any copyright issues clinged upon them. But, I could be wrong. 22:58, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: DW and also the picture itself doesn't seem to be own work. --Jcb (talk) 20:10, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographer has not the right to publish this under a free licence. We need the permission from Nintendo! Ras67 (talk) 12:25, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • De minimis applies not, the "Inflatable bouncer of Mario" is enormous. Even the file name means "Fluffy Super Mario". The photographer could take the picture without Mario from a different angle. Mario was included deliberately and his appearance is not insignificant and unavoidable. --Ras67 (talk) 15:35, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: it's not the main focus of the picture, also Nintendo designed something two-dimensional, while the depicted utilitarian object is three-dimensional. --Jcb (talk) 20:15, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not sourced to a Tasnim photographer

INeverCry 20:05, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep khamenei.ir is also Cc-by-4.0. Rodrigolopes (talk) 02:06, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Repetitive: File:Matteo Renzi, meeting Ali Khamenei in Tehran (3).jpg-Saman-1984 (talk) 09:06, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: /kept per Czar. --Jcb (talk) 20:17, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]