Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/02/06

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 6th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant and not needed for article anymore. LilyCaverly (talk) 05:17, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 10:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant and not needed for article anymore. LilyCaverly (talk) 05:18, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 10:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contemporary art, artist's permission via COM:OTRS is required. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn. --Krd 17:31, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hdsajdsadsa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused documents of questionable notability. Appear to be broken.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploaded by sock for likely malicious purposes (e.g., malware), no reason to continue this circus. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:32, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional images are out of COM:SCOPE and this one has no valid license at source, making it also COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:53, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 11:54, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant Flickrwashing of image from http://www.eluniversal.com.co/farandula/reinados/escogeran-la-nueva-miss-universo-y-asi-lucio-colombia-en-el-ensayo-de-la-gala GRuban (talk) 03:02, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Open'n'shut case of Flickrwashing a copyright violation. --Tabercil (talk) 22:25, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant Flickrwashing of http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Paulina+Vega/64th+Annual+Miss+Universe+Pageant/adUAiqWSh5u - as was Flickr user's other photo uploaded at the same time. I recommend blacklisting the Flickr user. GRuban (talk) 03:10, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Tabercil (talk) 22:28, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely authorship claims. Clearly a derivative work of a pre-existing portrait. LX (talk, contribs) 12:11, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hedwig in Washington: Commons:Deletion requests/File:General lao.jpg: Unlikely authorship claims. Clearly a derivative work of a pre-existing portrait.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Freedom of panorama#Uzbekistan на фото довольно таки современное здание построенное в 2000 году на его фотографирование нужно особое разрешение Bobyrr (talk) 08:46, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ymblanter: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in category:Hotel Uzbekistan

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused raster version. Commons has a vector one: File:Odakyu Hakone StaNo.svg. KurodaSho (talk) 10:09, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

代わりの画像が出来たから Y.WXYZ.S. (talk) 03:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, also uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 11:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused (except for bot-collecting pages on Commons such as User:콩가루/일본철도/2015 November) raster version. Commons has a vector one: File:Odakyu tama.svg. KurodaSho (talk) 10:13, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

代わりの画像が出来たから Y.WXYZ.S. (talk) 03:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 11:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused (except for bot-collecting pages on Commons such as User:콩가루/일본철도/2015 November) raster version. Commons has a vector one: File:Odakyu enoshima.svg. KurodaSho (talk) 10:15, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

代わりの画像が出来たから Y.WXYZ.S. (talk) 03:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, also uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 11:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was accidentally uploaded, it is legally owned by the artist Fashina Bombata. pleas take it down Sam B (200) (talk) 16:58, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Actual sulfur atoms are missing (notice only yellow lines, not angled yellow nodes), or else the perspecitve is confusingly-chosen.Have File:Copper-ATSM-3D-balls.png to illustrate the chemical including the sulfur atoms that are part of the key value of it. DMacks (talk) 21:28, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete As the uploader, I acknowledge the confusing style, and actually believe the structure is incorrect/not representative of the actual geometry. This is an old, orphaned file and I do not object to its deletion. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 21:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 00:57, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free media El Funcionario (talk) 16:07, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 02:06, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

has only been used for vandalism; see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chester_A._Arthur&diff=prev&oldid=702974362 173.77.21.48 21:13, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

vandalism (see File:Ugly guy named adk.jpeg, user's only other upload) 173.77.21.48 21:19, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad photoshop of unexplained subject. McGeddon (talk) 23:33, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:00, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, unexplained and unused image. McGeddon (talk) 23:34, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:00, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to me like film poster. Taivo (talk) 09:00, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:00, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:10, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:00, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is not very big and it has no metadata. Google search finds it in Internet, although with smaller resolution. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:28, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:00, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image mentions gettyimages as copyright holder, uploader claims to be the copyright holder. Wolbo (talk) 00:05, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:33, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image mentions Bob Dear (AP) as copyright holder, uploader claims to be the copyright holder. Wolbo (talk) 00:08, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:35, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Given deletion requests File:Irakli Labadze.jpg ‎and File:Alex Metreveli And Jan Kodes.jpg it is doubtful that uploader is rightful copyright holder. Wolbo (talk) 00:28, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and per http://365livesports.com/leila-meskhi/. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Given deletion requests File:Irakli Labadze.jpg ‎and File:Alex Metreveli And Jan Kodes.jpg it is doubtful that uploader is rightful copyright holder. Wolbo (talk) 00:28, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, net copyvio. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pedropedrones (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, can be found earlier on web. Uploaded in a row on 25.11.2015.

Gunnex (talk) 15:44, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, older or bigger versions can be found on the web ex : http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=1574075&page=5. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:54, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Hausratte (talk) 00:02, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake flag that was never used. Even DNR uses official flag File:Flag of Makiivka.svg for the city, see their website. This flag is not mentioned in any source and was probably first published on Commons NickK (talk) 00:37, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 02:20, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violaion. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:NOTUSED, and too blurry to realistically be useful; plenty of alternatives at Category:Klay Thompson Bagumba (talk) 02:37, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agree:Photo was originally uploaded before other higher quality NBA photographs existed--Amineshaker (talk) 04:18, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: the uploader agreed to deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a presumably copyrighted book cover. —Mr. Granger (talk  · contribs) 04:14, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image from flickr cannot be licensed by flickr photographer as it shows artwork, we'd need COM:OTRS from the creator of the image to retain. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:37, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:46, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo still has the credit bar and is claimed as own work. Other uploads by this individual are also similar copyvios. Pinging Steinsplitter so he can see if these cross-wiki uploads need greater attention. 180.73.0.29 01:46, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Coyau (talk) 22:34, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo still has the credit bar and is claimed as own work. Other uploads by this individual are also similar copyvios. Pinging Steinsplitter so he can see if these cross-wiki uploads need greater attention. 180.73.0.29 01:49, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Coyau (talk) 22:34, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo still has the credit bar and is claimed as own work. Other uploads by this individual are also similar copyvios. Pinging Steinsplitter so he can see if these cross-wiki uploads need greater attention. 180.73.0.29 01:50, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Coyau (talk) 22:35, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. —Mr. Granger (talk  · contribs) 04:08, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andrericcioalves (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 10:04, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 22:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jhonas92 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 10:56, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 22:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GeoLukas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 10:58, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 22:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified subject ; unidentified location ; no use ; I identified, located and (re)categorize many photos of the antiquities of the Louvre. But for this one, it is impossible because of the strong reflections of light. So, if the subject in unidentifiable, there is no encyclopedic value. Tangopaso (talk) 17:31, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Coyau (talk) 22:43, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EduAlejoBorda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal image : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:35, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:00, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unwanted... Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 19:01, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal photo, out of scope. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pornography Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 19:06, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal photo, out of scope. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (just a selfie). Sismarinho (talk) 21:43, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:04, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (just a selfie). Sismarinho (talk) 21:44, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:04, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. --JuTa 03:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free media El Funcionario (talk) 16:11, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted due to lack of permissions. --Sarah (talk) 04:00, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable authorship claims. Looks like a scan from a book. Found previously published in higher resolution elsewhere. LX (talk, contribs) 21:11, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 09:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy from http://kipfan.com/ru/photo/686.html (Фотография №2). Photographer Вера Голосова, no OTRS, no exif. 95.28.25.114 16:50, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal snaps are out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:57, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Used on a user page at ckb:بەکارھێنەر:Delan.jaff. While not automatically in scope, we do allow uploads of user page images. --De728631 (talk) 16:21, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, likely news shot: if uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:57, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per my comment above. --Courcelles 07:52, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviol from MovieStillDB.com Fringioα†Ω 13:58, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
changed to copyviol--Fringioα†Ω 14:25, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones 6 February 2015. --Achim (talk) 19:36, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contemporary artwork, not able to be licensed by the photographer, COM:OTRS from the sculptor is needed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:37, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also affected

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:37, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contemporary art, artist's permission via COM:OTRS is required. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:39, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contemporary art, artist's permission via COM:OTRS is required. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contemporary art, artist's permission via COM:OTRS is required. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:37, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contemporary art, artist's permission via COM:OTRS is required. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:37, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contemporary art, artist's permission via COM:OTRS is required. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:37, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contemporary art, artist's permission via COM:OTRS is required. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:38, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contemporary art, artist's permission via COM:OTRS is required. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:43, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:38, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contemporary art, artist's permission via COM:OTRS is required. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:43, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:38, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons requires that images in composites be uploaded and licensed separately, no sources of these images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:59, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: , lacks of sources. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:52, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User:Krunalwave). MER-C 08:11, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused logo of questionable notability. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:55, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abc123ARQUITECTO (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims. The uploader claims to have personally created these photographs, but that is contradicted by the file descriptions mentioning at least two different people as photographers (Nico Saieh and Pedro Mutis).

LX (talk, contribs) 10:55, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, older and bigger versions on the Web. Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:00, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нарушение авторства, уже есть на викискладе TReX92 (talk) 12:02, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Собственно оригинал, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Interpolitex_2013_(535-30).jpg TReX92 (talk) 12:04, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Sealle. --Riley Huntley (talk) 08:42, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Interpolitex_2013_(535-30).jpg TReX92 (talk) 12:05, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Оригинал, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Interpolitex_2013_(535-30).jpg TReX92 (talk) 12:06, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Sealle. --Riley Huntley (talk) 08:42, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of band with no hits on first page of Google search. According to now-deleted single image gallery page/article, it was founded in 2016. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:12, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Hystrix. --Riley Huntley (talk) 08:42, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ist zwar ein super gestochen scharfes Bild, jedoch zeigt es nicht den Ort Heddinghausen sondern den Nachbarort Leitmar. 93.195.80.184 18:31, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, können wir gerne umbenennen. Vielen Dank für die Hilfe. Nur ist das kein Löschgrund.
okay, we can rename the picture, no problem. Thx for your help. But no reason for deletion. --Michael (talk) 18:35, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
wie soll das Bild genau heißen ich kann es verschieben ;) Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 18:50, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Das Bild ist umbenannt, bitte prüfen ob es jetzt besser ist. Danke.
The picture is renamed, check it out, please. --Michael (talk) 19:10, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Ein falscher Bildname und leider auch keine richtige Bildbeschreibung sind nach den Löschrichtlinien kein Löschgrund. Dateiname wurde bereits berichtigt. Beschreibung mit Notizen, weitere Kategorisierungen und Bildentfernung aus dem Artikel Heddinghausen (auf Wikipedia.de) sind ebenfalls erfolgt. Danke an die IP 93.195.80.184 für den Hinweis, wenn auch über einen Löschantrag. Gruß --Asio 00:22, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Bildname und Bildbeschreibung korrigiert. Behalten! --S.Didam (talk) 09:38, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Nachdem die Fehler behoben sind, kann diese Diskussion beendet werden. Nur die falsche Weiterleitung sollte gelöscht werden, Links darauf gibt es nur noch im Zusammenhang mit dieser Löschdiskussion. .gs8 (talk) 10:49, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Riley Huntley (talk) 08:43, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 17:28, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 03:45, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 17:31, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 03:45, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 17:33, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 03:45, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 17:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 03:45, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo. No clear scope. May be above the TOO. Josve05a (talk) 17:38, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 03:45, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User:Self balancing two wheel scooter). MER-C 08:12, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:06, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable person. Outside project scope. Mark Marathon (talk) 10:27, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:06, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User talk:Globeled). MER-C 11:30, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:06, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:07, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ksu Francuzova (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:09, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:09, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:10, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:10, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NZANTI (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement and logo of company of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:13, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ユーザー作成ファイルではない(法人(えちごトキめき鉄道株式会社)の商標である)ため。 60.127.89.41 06:24, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per COM:TOO. →Nagy 11:55, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ユーザー作成ファイルではない(法人(あいの風とやま鉄道株式会社)の商標である)ため。 60.127.89.41 06:26, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per COM:TOO. →Nagy 11:59, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

必要性を感じないため Y.WXYZ (talk) 13:19, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "I don't think it is needed" is no valid reason for deletion. --Yasu (talk) 16:28, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files from User:Seemoramee

[edit]

This user has in a few weeks uploaded a large number of pornographic images and videos claiming all of them to be "own work", with the images generally tagged as CC-BY-SA-4.0 and the videos which appear to have a variety of sources as both "public domain" as a source(!?) and CC-BY-SA-3.0. I speedied File:Woman_under_and_on_top.webm as an obvious copyvio. However, on looking at their full contributions I couldn't decide immediately that they were all trivially copyvios (note that a large number of their uploads have already been deleted), so I seek wider thoughts. It's probable that these are the user's personal collection, and even that some of them are made by them, but that doesn't necessarily mean there's subject consent (no sign of them given), and it's not clear to me that any of these are in scope (we've got more than enough of this sort of stuff).

Examples (NSFW, if that matters for fellow reviewers):

I'm strongly minded to indef-block the user on the balance of probabilities. What do you all think? James F. (talk) 09:39, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Removed the specifically listed images, as there seems to be no consensus (and a very low probability) that they are in scope, regardless of other concerns. The rest seem to be at another DR. --Reventtalk 23:11, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 颐园新居 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: 作者本人请求删除,原因:上传了错误的版本,删除后重新上传. Taivo (talk) 18:18, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: more or less fresh upload and uploaders request. --JuTa 01:24, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not inspired by the source stated, but is in fact an exact copy of. Delete at COM:DW of non-free content 180.73.0.29 02:13, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - globe has just been rotated slightly... likely a copyright violation of Redditor brain4breakfast. --Storkk (talk) 13:51, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User:Circom power technologies). MER-C 05:16, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, non-notable company logo: out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 13:52, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text only file which could easily be reproduced by typing in the data. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:50, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Globally replaced by <math>\begin{align} \dot{M_f}&=\rho_f \frac{V}{t} \\ \dot{M_f}&: \textrm{mass\ flow\ rate\ of\ fuel,\;} \mathrm{kg/sec}\\ V&: \textrm{volume\ of\ fuel,\;} \mathrm{m^3} \\ t&: \textrm{time,\;} \mathrm{sec} \\ \rho_f&: \textrm{density\ of\ fuel,\;} \mathrm{kg/m^3}\end{align}</math> Storkk (talk) 14:06, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted after being replaced by TeX. --Storkk (talk) 14:06, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional portrait photo, no EXIF, no evidence of permission/self-work. Possible copyvio. Nick (talk) 08:42, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Photographer should confirm license via COM:OTRS to have photo undeleted. --Storkk (talk) 14:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If you don't know who the author is, how did you get their permission to publish their work under a Creative Commons license? This license requires attribution of the author. The source link doesn't work. LX (talk, contribs) 10:11, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Albert Debeyre is born in 1877. This file may be centenary.--Claude PIARD (talk) 10:23, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So that means you can just make up some random claim that the author of the photograph (who you haven't tried to identify) has explicitly approved publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license?! How on earth is it possible that you've been uploading files to Commons for over four years, and you still think that's acceptable?
Even when it comes to works in the public domain, you cannot just be making things up about them like that. Claiming that a photo in the public domain is covered by a copyright license, which requires it to be protected by copyright, is called copyfraud and is illegal. And as for this particular work, there is no evidence that it is in the public domain.
As for your claim here that this photo might be more than 100 years old, that's obviously not true. On the file description, you claimed it was taken in 2014, but let's work with the 1877 date of birth, which seem more plausible. For this photo to be 100 years old, it would have to be taken no later than 1916. The subject is clearly well above 40 years old in this photo. So that's another completely made-up claim.
Finally, while you haven't actually claimed that the photo is in the public domain, let me preempt such arguments by pointing out once again that there is no evidence of that. A photo of a person who died 56 years ago could easily have been taken by someone who died less than 70 years ago, which is the standard copyright term in France. A rationale like {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} is also out of the question, as there is no evidence of when and where the first publication took place or whether the author was disclosed. LX (talk, contribs) 10:44, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: no edivence that photo is Public Domain. --Storkk (talk) 14:11, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free. Copyright Timothy Birdsall himself (died 1963) or possibly The Sunday Times, and either way won't be PD in the UK for another 20 years(ish). Which is unfortunate Jarry1250 (talk) 18:30, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly (uploaded at the same time, and with the same deletion rationale):

The uploader could consider uploading the last of these to the English Wikipedia as a non-free image.

Jarry1250 (talk) 18:33, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to complete the paperwork for the other uploads until today unfortunately: see Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Wormtub67 and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Timothy Birdsall.jpg. Jarry1250 (talk) 18:04, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:59, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploads by Winfried Povel

[edit]

I don't believe Winfried Povel (talk · contribs) holds the rights to the images he has uploaded. The EXIF data for these images are also very telling, as an array of cameras are documented.

Then there are uploads he describes as cover art.

Other pictures.

Note that an entry of the uploader exists on the Dutch Wikipedia: nl:Winfried Povel. Born in 1951, the uploads of photos the photos taken from the mid-1930s to 1950s really doesn't add up. This brings into question the authenticity of the claims for the rest. — ξxplicit 07:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, all require confirmation of authorship and license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 11:54, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Given deletion requests File:Irakli Labadze.jpg ‎and File:Alex Metreveli And Jan Kodes.jpg it is doubtful that uploader is rightful copyright holder. Wolbo (talk) 00:28, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. If uploader is the copyright holder, that should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:44, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free media El Funcionario (talk) 16:10, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete, obvious {{copyvio}}, as it was already tagged. This is clearly non-free Google content with false PD claims. I don't understand why you converted this to a regular deletion discussion. LX (talk, contribs) 18:57, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Because I know way more frWiki procedures than Commons ones ; cause my english is basic, most pages remain untranslated in french and I don't know how to do ; I'd like to delete all pictures by this user within one click but I only know how to use the "quickdelete" gadget that I brought on the left column... --El Funcionario (talk) 21:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 10:47, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a mural, but an icon. There is no indication that it is public domain. Zoupan (talk) 19:42, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 10:51, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Based on this, this looks like a cropped album cover. We'd need evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder, such album covers are typically employed as fair use which we don't permit here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 20:58, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio (disc cover). --BrightRaven (talk) 14:18, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Som nb

[edit]

All copyvios, see the original sources linked in the captions on en:Jagat Singh (Actor) --Opencooper (talk) 01:10, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:49, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. imho scanned, and thumbnail format and missing exif, as well as media not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 03:21, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:49, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contemporary art, artist's permission via COM:OTRS is required. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep This image is about the art centre as a building and not its artworks. Even more the artworks present in this image are clearly De Minimis and even if they were main part, they are simple geomethrical shapes . Tm (talk) 05:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Not DM and the simple geomethrical shape argument is false. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:50, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1943 marriage license is unlikely to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:54, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:50, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1944 identity card is unlikely to be own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:54, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:50, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a discussion for deletion for files inside this category and NOT only for the category itself. I filed Commons:Deletion requests/File:New Power Party Logo Without Text.jpg for deletion and it got passed. If that's a valid reason it would apply to all files inside this category. Liangent (talk) 06:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of files:
Liangent (talk) 06:38, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyrighted logo's. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:51, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: unfree sculpture (J. Zaninovic, d. 1946). Eleassar (t/p) 07:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:52, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Architecture by V. Glanz (d. 1977), sculpture by K. Putrih (d. 1959) and Z. Kalin (d. 1990). Per COM:FOP#Slovenia, not free for Commons until 2061. Eleassar (t/p) 07:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:52, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems doubtful that the screenshot consists entirely of content that was dedicated to the public domain via the CC0 dedication. (Though the Superfan.com site does not appear to be currently functional, the file description indicates a date in July 2009 and this archived version of the Superfan.com home page from June 2009 has an "all rights reserved" copyright notice.) Gazebo (talk) 07:58, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:52, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems doubtful that the depicted software (Security Master AV, a rogue security program) was released under a free content license. Gazebo (talk) 08:10, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:52, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not relevant to Wikipedia contents and the images is taken from seventeenhandriving.com without any permissions Thatonewikiguy (talk) 08:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:52, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the Hercules Fountain in Ljubljana. Only the sculpture on the column is original, the rest of the fountain is a reconstruction from the 1990s.

Eleassar (t/p) 08:48, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Das wäre dann zu löschen, wenn es sich bei der nachträglich angebrachten Säule um ein rechtlich geschütztes Kunstwerk handelt. Ansonsten führten Reparaturen, Ergänzungen und Sanierungen zum Ende der Stadtfotographie in Slowenien. Gündel


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:53, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iceburned (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Finding photos in a document on the Internet does not make it one's own work, does not make one the author or copyright holder, and does not give one the right to issue any license for the copyright of those works. If any of these photos are in the public domain, they can be kept, but that needs to be demonstrated, and their file descriptions need to be corrected.

LX (talk, contribs) 09:55, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:53, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused raster version. Commons has a vector one: File:HakoneRopeway logo.svg. KurodaSho (talk) 10:03, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:53, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused raster version. Commons has a vector one: File:HakoneTozanLine logo.svg. KurodaSho (talk) 10:06, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:53, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, unidentified logos. No clear scope. May be above the TOO. Josve05a (talk) 10:13, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:53, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo. No clear scope. Above the TOO. Josve05a (talk) 10:14, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:53, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo. No clear scope. May be above the TOO. Josve05a (talk) 10:15, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:53, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused (JPG) logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 10:16, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:53, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 10:35, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:53, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, uploader's claim he is the author is not probable. Tekstman (talk) 11:06, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As it happens to be, I am the owner, my deceased father made the picture.Otto S. Knottnerus (talk) 01:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I see no reason to assume that the uploader lies since he has been a trusted community member for a long time. If the photograph are taken by his diseased father he can license them. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, uploader's claim he is the author is not probable. Tekstman (talk) 11:07, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As it happens to be, I am the owner, my deceased father made the picture.Otto S. Knottnerus (talk) 01:40, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I see no reason to assume that the uploader lies since he has been a trusted community member for a long time. If the photograph are taken by his diseased father he can license them. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, uploader's claim he is the author is not probable. Tekstman (talk) 11:07, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As it happens to be, I am the owner, my deceased father made the picture.Otto S. Knottnerus (talk) 01:41, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I see no reason to assume that the uploader lies since he has been a trusted community member for a long time. If the photograph are taken by his diseased father he can license them. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of a painter which is still alive Shev123 (talk) 11:17, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of a painter which is still alive Shev123 (talk) 11:17, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:57, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of a painter which is still alive Shev123 (talk) 11:17, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:57, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of a painter which is still alive Shev123 (talk) 11:18, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:57, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of a painter which is still alive Shev123 (talk) 11:18, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:57, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused painting, by anonymous uploader - unclear copyright status. The same for rest of uploads, unless we assume, that if one was OTRS-confirmed (File:Orient und Okzident.jpg), it applies also to the rest. Pibwl (talk) 11:51, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination -also as collage art, each of the photographs used in the collage would need to have proper source and license. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:46, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused wikiversity(?) image, no educational use Pibwl (talk) 11:53, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, see File:JOystick.jpg in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:46, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused photo of unknown person, by unkown photographer (I assume, that the uploader is on the photo) Pibwl (talk) 11:55, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:47, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nice-looking, but what's the scope? No category, no proper description. Pibwl (talk) 11:56, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:47, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused autopromo photos & logos, no apparent notability, along with File:Fedexaward3 at usa.JPG, File:Fedexaward1 at usa.JPG, File:Processweaver.jpg, File:Processweaverlogo.gif Pibwl (talk) 12:07, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - all promotional or self-promotional. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyright violation Shev123 (talk) 12:11, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 12:13, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence to support the unlikely claim that the author of this photograph died more than 70 years ago. LX (talk, contribs) 12:32, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 13:09, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable individual. Outside project scope Mark Marathon (talk) 13:33, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope; COM is not a personal photo repository. TJH2018talk 16:37, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:04, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The person who uploaded the file does not own the copyright and never asked my permission, the photographer, to use it. The copyright holder is Gaspar Avila. This photo is present in several commercial photography agencies, as is the case of Alamy: http://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-sete-cidades-crater-and-the-twin-lakes-azores-islands-portugal-9098268.html 78.29.133.181 14:13, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Géo Dorival died in 1968. He was French, so the rule for these works originating in France is pma 70 and they will go out of his copyright on 1/1/2039. Many of them contain considerable signed text, which also has a copyright, so those may be under copyright even longer.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:38, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:58, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Identical copy of File:Գեդեոն Միրաղյանը Իսայու դերում Սունդուկյանի «Խաթաբալա».jpg, taken from the same source Kareyac (talk) 14:43, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I kept this one and deleted the other one (same day uploads) because this one was in use and the other was not. They were identical otherwise. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File description: "This portrait of our dog, Boron 5, is modeled after an unattributed photo of a Boston Terrier found on the internet. January 2010", That makes this a derivative work of the photograph from which it was taken. "Unatrritbuted" does not mean there is no copyright and since there is no evidence that the photograph was freely licensed, we cannot keep this unless the artist can get a license from the photographer. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:44, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Let me say it differently: This is a portrait of our dog, Boron 5, using a pose and perspective from a photo of a Boston Terrier found on the internet. The drawing is of my dog, done entirely by me. The pose in the photograph was more interesting than any photos I had taken of Boron. I don't believe copyright in a photo extends to the pose of the subject in the photo. Rsperberg (talk)

If the photograph in question is http://www.bostonterrierforums.com/training/training-equippment-and-your-boston-terrier, then there is no question that your drawing is a derivative work. Except for the differences inherent in the different media, they are virtually identical. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, derivative work of photo from bostonterrierforums.com. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:52, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gendown (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Songs. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, professional quality recordings with no permissions. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:53, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free media El Funcionario (talk) 16:08, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused text file with no source. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:54, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free media El Funcionario (talk) 16:09, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused text file with no source. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:54, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free media El Funcionario (talk) 16:09, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused text file with no source. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:54, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free media El Funcionario (talk) 16:10, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No indication of why this image should be deleted. It's small but it has camera data. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:55, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused (JPG) logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 16:11, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map is a derivative of multiple images—their provenance is not listed in the details. It could be a copyvio or it could be free use, but we don't know unless it's specified. czar 16:15, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Maybe http://kishikawamiyoshi.com/album_yunomachi/ and http://kishikawamiyoshi.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/kishikawa_icon_1000.jpg Aoioui (talk) 16:18, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 16:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:57, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a type in the title and we have decided that it would be better for the image's owner Tanya Sirotina to upload it herself rather than my doing it on her behalf. Translat99 (talk) 17:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It screen shot from video, Right top side writing AA, means Anadolu Agency Sakhalinio (talk) 17:28, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Visit url link out of commons scope Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 18:27, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source says "This graphic may be reproduced in any form of educational or non-profit purposes", therefore commercial uses aren't allowed, which doesn't fit Wikimedia Commons rules. Same problem, then, for the derivative version. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:59, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

visit url link Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 18:49, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:59, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It doesn't appear there now, but the stated source is http://www.booking.com/hotel/no/sandnessja-en.no.html. Nevertheless, the uploader claims to be the author and copyright holder. Finding a file on the Internet does not make one the author or copyright holder. LX (talk, contribs) 18:49, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:00, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

visit url link Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 18:55, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:00, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jjbremeruserw (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:01, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Domi345 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:01, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Youness-atif (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Songs and logo. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:01, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A derivative work of an award. This doodle art is based on " Description Swedish: An 8 cm high statuette designed by Nils Skoog and precisionsgjutits of Kanthal AB. The picture is characterized by Patrik Skantze year in 1977." according to the en:wiki page on which it is in use. It's not user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:13, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:10, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata reads "Author Fotograf Joakim Lenell. Imagen Photo Copyright holder Fotograf Joakim Lenell. Imagen Photo. ", but the description claims differently. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:10, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that the uploader, Mattboris, is either the claimed file creator, J. Mathews, or the presumed copyright owner, QuestFusion corporation. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:48, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:10, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started as missing EXIF, but imho also the related other recent uploads are rather for 'promotional' use (selfies), hence 'out of scope' Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:58, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:01, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dgeise (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of logos unreasonably claimed as PD-textlogo.

Sealle (talk) 20:31, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Those logo's are clearly above TOO. While a small amount might be a borderline case the vast majority isn't. I fail to see any harrasment here. I just see an admin who investigates copyright violation. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:07, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF, mysteriously watermarked. Gunnex (talk) 20:42, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:02, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akadjjove4 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Akadjjove4 (file cropper/watermark remover) and (all files uploaded in a row on 15.02.2014):


Gunnex (talk) 22:43, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:03, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This precise version is unsourced but almost certainly non-free (although an earlier version, properly sourced, might be {{PD-Anonymous-EU}}. See also en:File:The Sunday Times logo.png Jarry1250 (talk) 18:45, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:20, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This still has been misidentified as coming from a 1922 film. It is a still from the 1930 Paramount Pictures feature film Paramount on Parade. This scene is from a sequence called "Murder Will Out", with William Powell as Philo Vance and Clive Brook as Sherlock Holmes. The photo could be kept if the file name were corrected and an appropriate PD copyright tag could be found; but this image is not from 1922. — WFinch (talk) 06:23, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Replaced by a correct image.CecilF (talk) 23:27, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Outstanding. Please withdraw this nomination. — WFinch (talk) 00:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: issue corrected with new upload. P 1 9 9   15:45, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is dated 1953 but the uploader claim to be the copyright owner, unknown by which procedure uploader has aquired the copyright. Regardless, the photo is not used by any Wikimedia project. This is uploader's only contribution. Thuresson (talk) 16:12, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License should likely be {{PD-Cuba}}. Storkk (talk) 10:49, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Subject of the photo was born in Cuba 1920 and emigrated to Brazil in 1924 (source). There is no evidence that the photo has any connection to Cuba. Thuresson (talk) 22:20, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:47, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Undesired user template that is user a few times in the file namespace. Leyo 01:07, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This kind of transclusion of a user's subpage on file pages can be treated as an inappropiate use (here an example for the above link won't show files any longer). Therefore I removed the transclusions from 7 files found by searching insource:/\{\{User\:Pulsar\.co\.nr\/badge/. So the pages User:Pulsar.co.nr/badge and User:Pulsar.co.nr/badge/Geotag can be kept for they are not in use now outside User: ns. The user's Pulsar.co.nr latest contrib here on Commons was of June 2009. So I think we can  Keep. --Achim (talk) 16:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There is not really a need to keep it. However, if we do, at least Category:Geocoding templates and Category:Infobox templates need to be removed. --Leyo 16:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, Leyo. --Achim (talk) 17:00, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Krd 12:27, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Finnusertop as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This is a colorized version of a black and white 1917 published US PD photograph (File:Eric Enstrom - Grace - bw.jpg, en:Grace). However, the colorization is likely to have its own copyright. According to the source, the colorizations date to the 1940s and after, so they are possibly not PD (subject to notice and renewal, of which I have no information.) See also Talk. Wdwd (talk) 13:48, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Krd 12:27, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama neither in France nor in Italy. The sculpture is apparently modern. Taivo (talk) 09:54, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Linking two images from two different mountain articles (Mont Dolent and Tour Ronde) which are physically separate, on the borders with different countries is sloppy.
Regarding Mont Dolent: had you taken the trouble to read the inscription in the photo - or indeed the article - you would have realised this statue is located on the border of Switzerland and Italy and very close to France. The plaque clearly shows it was erected in 1954 by the "jeuenes du valais". A little bit of effort with Google translate and a map would have shown this to be the "youth of valais" - i.e. erected by the young people of Switzerland. As such your rush to delete file:Mont Dolent summit.JPG is flawed and invalid. See Switzerland.
The last time I showed good faith and pasted in emails to demonstrate I was approaching the Italian authorities to investigate the history and copyright ownership of another statue (of Emile Rey, uploaded by another user some years before), it was deleted in less that ten days over the 2015 Christmas period - wholly insufficient to respond to what I regard as the 'corporate Wikinazi' approach to over-speedy image deletion which prevents any real and demonstrable endeavours to respond to genuine concerns over copyright and to investigate and put right any accidental infringement by others. For that reason I shalln't be wasting any more effort in approaching the relevant Italian authorities again or defending the other image (File:Tour Ronde - statue of the virgin on summit.jpg), so delete away. Parkywiki (talk) 11:17, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Krd 12:31, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jotagueerrepe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Gunnex (talk) 21:19, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For File:Colares de rebuçados madeirenses.jpg the uploader claims own work via (example) Special:diff/186869837. If you are able to upload the photo in significant higher resolution with consistent EXIF information from the used digicam (as you already did in your 3 other remaining own-works-uploads in 12.2015 (like here), I would reconsider the nomination. "Per COM:PRP" takes into account additionally also your logs, 1x block and finally 6x removing deletion templates from your user talk (despite of a warning not to do so, except while archiving).

For File:BroasdeMeldeCana.png (and 2 +/- duplicates, source country: Portugal) the uploader claims — per File talk:BroasdeMeldeCana.png: "(...) it is NOT a logo from a commercial brand or other that could reclaim its copyrights, it is not a sofisticated logo, consisting mostly of simple typography (...)". Ignoring the first part (which is simple wrong) I am obviously focused to clear the status of the design of the deliquescent honey (which was only partially overwritten by text). Let's wait for opinions by other users.Gunnex (talk) 09:55, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Gunnex: Olá. Eu já carreguei a fotografia File:Colares_de_rebuçados_madeirenses.jpg através do smartphone com que a tirei, como pode ver. Eu antes tinha enviado a foto para mim mesmo (através do chat do Facebook) para a poder carregar pelo computador, pois seria mais fácil. Quanto às outras imagens, onde é que é possível eu ver os comentários dos outros utilizadores sobre se elas podem ficar no Commons? Obrigado. :) --Jotagueerrepe (talk) 00:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Obrigado =  I withdraw my nomination for File:Colares de rebuçados madeirenses.jpg.
"onde é que é possível eu ver os comentários dos outros utilizadores (...)". Aqui. Gunnex (talk) 06:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, there was no compelling reason to keep these logos, they were not below COM:TOO and the source given did not provide copyright information. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]