Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/12/19

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 19th, 2015


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Miss use of copyrights. Wpmint (talk) 06:00, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept: Mistake (or possible vandal) DR. --Amitie 10g (talk) 09:48, 19 December 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Singaporearchitects (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 08:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. This looks like something from a spam/advertising service. I've seen other images from various companies recently that use almost identical wording and link placement in the descriptions. INeverCry 08:07, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Spam - out of scope - gone Herby talk thyme 08:38, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

全般8 Eses1026 (talk) 03:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 16:08, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

全般8 Eses1026 (talk) 03:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 16:07, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samsungunlukkiralikev (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality ??? image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 16:04, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Spam. Yann (talk) 17:25, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality ??? image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:07, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:22, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality ??? image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:07, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Spam. Yann (talk) 17:25, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Isn't this a commercial advert? Hansmuller (talk) 20:01, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, these are photos directly from the company pertaining to the product.— Preceding unsigned comment added by PurePromo4You (talk • contribs)


Deleted: Clear spam. Unclear copyright status. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 20:46, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Isn't this a commercial advert? Hansmuller (talk) 20:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is not an advertisement. this is a picture pertaining to the product offered by comet core inc.— Preceding unsigned comment added by PurePromo4You (talk • contribs)


Deleted: Clear spam. Unclear copyright status. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 20:45, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Isn't this a commercial advert? Hansmuller (talk) 20:03, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is not an advertisement. this is a picture pertaining to the product offered by comet core inc.— Preceding unsigned comment added by PurePromo4You (talk • contribs)


Deleted: Clear spam. Unclear copyright status. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 20:45, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Isn't this a commercial advert? Read the metadata please. Hansmuller (talk) 20:03, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is not an advertisement. this is a picture pertaining to the product offered by comet core inc.— Preceding unsigned comment added by PurePromo4You (talk • contribs)


Deleted: Clear spam. Unclear copyright status. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 20:43, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Isn't this a commercial advert? Read the metadata please. Hansmuller (talk) 20:04, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is not an advertisement. this is a picture pertaining to the product offered by comet core inc.— Preceding unsigned comment added by PurePromo4You (talk • contribs)


Deleted: Clear spam. Unclear copyright status. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 20:42, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Isn't this a commercial advert? Read the metadata please. Hansmuller (talk) 20:04, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is not an advertisement. this is a picture pertaining to the product offered by comet core inc.— Preceding unsigned comment added by PurePromo4You (talk • contribs)


Deleted: Clear spam. Unclear copyright status. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 20:41, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Isn't this a commercial advert? Read the metadata please. Hansmuller (talk) 20:05, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is not an advertisement. this is a picture pertaining to the product offered by comet core inc.— Preceding unsigned comment added by PurePromo4You (talk • contribs)


Deleted: Clear spam. Unclear copyright status. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 20:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Isn't this a commercial advert? Read the metadata please. Hansmuller (talk) 20:05, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is not an advertisement. this is a picture pertaining to the product offered by comet core inc.— Preceding unsigned comment added by PurePromo4You (talk • contribs)


Deleted: Clear spam. Unclear copyright status. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 20:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Isn't this a commercial advert? Read the metadata please. Hansmuller (talk) 20:06, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is not an advertisement. this is a picture pertaining to the product offered by comet core inc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PurePromo4You (talk • contribs)


Deleted: Clear spam. Unclear copyright status. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 20:38, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Isn't this a commercial advert? Copyright on logo? Read the metadata please. Hansmuller (talk) 20:06, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is not an advertisement. this is a picture pertaining to the product offered by comet core inc.— Preceding unsigned comment added by PurePromo4You (talk • contribs)


Deleted: Clear spam. Unclear copyright status. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 20:37, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Content is apparently a copyright violation, It is copied picture from here:http://www.michigan.org/blog/guest-blogger/tips-for-photographing-the-milky-way-in-michigan-and-seven-stunning-starry-night-photos-too/attachment/_mg_4480/ Texaner (talk) 20:07, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedied as copyvio. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:55, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Overprocessed and not in use on any Project Page other than a user's gallery, same condition for File:La culture ne s'hérite pas, elle se conquiert. André Malraux, 1901-1976 -pt.svg, File:La culture ne s'hérite pas, elle se conquiert. André Malraux, 1901-1976 -fr.svg and File:La culture ne s'hérite pas, elle se conquiert. André Malraux, 1901-1976 -fr.svg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:20, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unneeded image, this took an image from Commons, added words and a border and reuploaded it. Out of COM:SCOPE, Commons is not here for the making of motivational posters. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:21, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:26, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded as "personal work"; Is actually a non-free image that fails free use DrRNC (talk) 20:54, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 21:34, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused poster art created from a much higher quality image already in the Commons collection, no reason to keep this one. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:43, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Português: Paz e bem! Favor indicar a imagem com este mesmo cartaz em melhor qualidade. Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 20:53, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:26, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused poster art created from a much higher quality image already in the Commons collection, no reason to keep this one. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:43, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Português: Paz e bem! Favor indicar a imagem com este mesmo cartaz em melhor qualidade. Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 20:53, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Image is File:Victor Hugo 001.jpg here, there is no reason to colorize it in the style of Andy Warhol and add words. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:55, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:25, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, overprocessed image of which Commons already holds the original, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:44, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Português: Paz e bem! Discordo da avaliação sobre a qualidade da imagem. Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 20:49, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:26, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work in this portrait of a living artist. No metadata. User's other uploads were copied from the artist's webpage/blog and other sources. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Info A proper permission has been recieved on OTRS with the number #2015121710027603. — 0x010C ~talk~ 02:08, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Permission OK. Yann (talk) 11:04, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Melicolrat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images are in use elsewhere on the web including pages which advertise the artist's shows. One of them is large and has metadata, the other one appears to be a crop from it. The artist uses this image on his google plus page, see https://plus.google.com/112411183201066158589/about as an icon. Uploaders other contributions included copyvios.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The smaller image is in use on a fr:wiki page which has a tag suggesting too few sources. Begins to look like promotional uploading as well. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:25, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Probably legitimate. As he's a professional artist and photographer, presumably he can make a self-portrait. It seems unfair to say that the other contributions were copyvios, when it's likely a case where the author neglected to send the OTRS confirmation quickly enough. The missing permission tag would seem better than the copyvio tag. Note the username, which looks like a hybrid between the name of his assistant and the name of the artist. He left a question on the Commons:Bistro just two days ago, and I answered explaining him to send OTRS confirmation from his official address to confirm that he is who he is. When dealing with likely legitimate uploads by good faith new users who are asking for help, I think we should leave them time to turn around and to get used to Commons before hitting them. So, I would say leave him a chance to sort it out with OTRS. If nothing happens, then we can delete. -- Asclepias (talk) 21:35, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Info A proper permission has been recieved on OTRS with the number #2015121610009394. — 0x010C ~talk~ 02:07, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Permission OK. Yann (talk) 11:03, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Same image is found on Artist's google Plus page, here HR with EXIF, might be OK. Yann (talk) 19:10, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment There's also the issue of the artists works over his shoulder which show in the image. There's no indication that the uploader is this artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:57, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
IMO the artist's works are de minimis here. Yann (talk) 22:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Info A proper permission has been recieved on OTRS with the number #2015121710027603. — 0x010C ~talk~ 02:09, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 11:01, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JP Elavathingal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that any of these images were created by the uploader, various sizes, no metadata, strange captions (i.e. it's not Vishnu, it's an elephant), all combine to make this more likely a gallery collected from the internet than own work of uploader.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:10, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Several copyvios proved. All doubtfull. Yann (talk) 13:03, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by JP Elavathingal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering previous DR (see above) and User talk:JP Elavathingal

Gunnex (talk) 10:09, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YELLOWMUSIC (talk · contribs)

[edit]

files can be found at http://yellowmusic.nl/ and other websites. We need explicit permission (see Commons:OTRS).

Basvb (talk) 23:25, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvios. Yann (talk) 13:16, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted photo from www.sanantonio.gov SanAnMan (talk) 19:11, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:43, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission at source, which is professional photographers site Basvb (talk) 23:18, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am the photographer, my name is Stefano Cavoretto and I took the photo 2 days ago Outerspace813

@Outerspace813, it's a nice photo. To ensure that we do not get any false claims we require photographers to contact Commons:OTRS in these cases using for example and email address linked to the website. I'm sorry to set you up with a bit of extra work but would you be willing to contact Commons:OTRS to ensure this? Greetings, Basvb (talk) 10:36, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@BasvbThank you, I just did.
Good, when this is fixed, we can add the photo again to the German article.--XanonymusX (talk) 21:46, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Permission has been send Basvb (talk) 19:19, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Makeyourchoice (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Has no educational value for Commons. Therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

Wiki13 talk 12:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Makeyourchoice (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Has no educational value for Commons. Therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

Wiki13 talk 16:18, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:34, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Basvb: Spam

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:20, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Magog the Ogre: Spam

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not this users image just like their only other one which is a copyright violation and uploaded a year after it was made as seen from a google image search which has many results that predates it being here 92.237.211.110 18:50, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Achim55: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: http://data.whicdn.com/images/138082128/original.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: own work? https://www.google.de/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiuTilSg5GGkPG8oWwSEdn8W_1ZPUuxu7l2T56WpRBavCXPp2fhqmuUwsS8OmInOz26jgCqcYGE_1CqRQm5b6mh9r4l6y0xyb3SxYqnIK9f_1SbPydNygj49g6YN0IhPeDyuQ73WqOJFuzDv-i0mTes9p8O_1v5FVglasmn12LJje0QJ7xzmPHXHMEPcjKlVLW9nG7ScT-iSMt-XJlRXX23GYiCJ-WSPd855fKXzbiKyCwNtS9AiWvwOoYKPbk1djY94POBB-0mEhISl6AEeqZx-DUmpJ2vgSCv_1UM-RigaGFeHiE8vrCAnG_1QV3tY69KkU4Ef4i5qXIKGr29apiZ31qUXI-DgUMBKmIBWhRo-UixyGGwb-WnztD9J5p-KKmXPGwzxyTZsvGyIXakVk05DXBqRnzSu5bOGy6eFbpAoyWCBtxc2eSeRI2Kd-QTGQSYbMUKQQ0bHykB11-kvR-ULS8aJ4L7q4lvX-iPLWCkOUWUtSVkzAbLZLCsuRUnm1rx5IUIcX4v-XpIr-QT1s6e46l1rjrAtoL097NbHReOpoii2FMY59QN014wiP8iG33lMroj-O7zAqsH58-ywDr2GNue32KSaKEqV-zH1wZNBVEB-UMVVLib2bb2FlHOfBvcFnvU5Xd5Uh8hRPGt0tTXiHiOKc1IHwEv79EnGuEiBjoAg_1Aax5B4vW1EuN6lWWJzmjWJIftNfmOhNQE5r5gGvUv3hTZJ7LfDFtExOd8lCoTjFm_1GAdwZDg64M69tPCdoZkIyUb8el1GxeG96jr94-TvYfc_1komOE0qH38ievf1d1VW29cgvXrx6-aE_1TXZEzEq5WqpK9iYpcXyUD93h8r_167T_1GBmo1_1b0HvHRjUeLI3Drx6sizxx9t-cE026KwkbVulFFIPnj2Ffx0LsxEDsvZo-NiN6GeiS5tKw5IOQjoBOo36jDe-tOUOn691r8s0naGrYHZAiRmxWuk8lFzJb0wqXlMTrUWdnUpZiMCVCSzb_1zjsbte2c-rBPOIlpW-8gt-d4pwuOGWCCnv8A9T0xl2mQMSPxBf6wJ4cqKUVn2msXa1navjXkcgQelBAd3AZd8FYoVAKla-tJJhkEvBiv31Yl66KTNRahZxKXYqMyc1Mg18ZnOOJO1LC4ovamYFPS21-DKbS5jQt8iJAPRrX3X9FqZZKAOtigmm5P-HKFqXPdBKl7UTyLY-Gmjj4Qim1HrEuTDEE_14wB9l1lvsHsw-aLOvlnEE_1B8qnWcjFlRpHP4JGUB7rw_1p1EYhZxvlsaFB-jQ2zEhYMffwrC1_1CQ7K1Z9Skl_1utcu9MDBQT7gZpoZCqERaVDoAvjW588gmoZ87inIWfB1ZtoQIuuk6_1n4xMMEpE0cicQteCs1MKyXP9APvpwqvRMn81xhyzbNmxfzFTrIRyEcU7ezv0ONjhDotIYdQYhTZhLA&gws_rd=cr&ei=ps91VvvMMMbGOuGntsAG Probably old enough. Yann (talk) 21:57, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Magog the Ogre: Mass deletion of pages added by Bqn1996: Copyright violation; found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork. Out of scope. Takeaway (talk) 23:14, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Alan: OTRS: Unaccepted or insufficient permission for use on Commons, read Wikimedia OTRS for restoration. Media missing permission as of 11 December 2015 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file can be found at http://yellowmusic.nl/ and other websites. We need explicit permission (see Commons:OTRS). Basvb (talk) 23:26, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:02, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and possible copyright violation. Takeaway (talk) 23:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:02, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Basvb (talk) 23:32, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:02, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of scope Basvb (talk) 23:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:02, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poster, Com:Advert Basvb (talk) 23:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:01, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screengrab Basvb (talk) 23:44, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:01, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, out of scope Basvb (talk) 23:45, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:01, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EB YTP MASTER (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely screengrabs, spongebobs copyright and game creater copyrights infringed

Basvb (talk) 23:45, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:00, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can be found at [1] Basvb (talk) 23:46, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:00, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copied from print/paper Basvb (talk) 23:46, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:00, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

book drawing, own work unlikel Basvb (talk) 23:46, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:59, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo above threshold of originality, needs permission (Commons:OTRS) Basvb (talk) 23:47, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:59, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

from newspaper? Basvb (talk) 23:50, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NO, THIS PICTURE IS NOT COPIED FROM A NEWSPAPER. THE PERSON WHOSE PHOTO IS IN QUESTION BELONGS TO MY FATHER. I SCANNED THE PHOTO FROM A BOOK HE HAS PUBLISHED. HOWEVER, IF THIS IS OBJECTIONABLE I CAN GHANGE IT. BUT STILL THE COPYRIGHT OF BOTH THE PHOTO & THE BOOK BELONGS TO US. THANK YOU...
@Geckingezgin, If you own the copyright on the photo that means that we can keep the photo. In these cases we do however require permission to be send to Commons:OTRS to ensure that this really is the case. Would you please contact Commons:OTRS? Greetings, Basvb (talk) 10:39, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:59, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Com:advert/copyvio Basvb (talk) 23:50, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:58, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can be found (in smaller size) at [2], leads me to believe this is a copyvio from somewhere else Basvb (talk) 23:51, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:57, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small size, no exif and doubts about whether in scope Basvb (talk) 23:52, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:57, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, advert Basvb (talk) 23:53, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:57, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, created in 2007, uploaded in 2015, user with bad history, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 21:38, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:07, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:07, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:43, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:07, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused self-described "test" file, seems equivalent to File:Asinger Reaction 2.svg except for having less-standard geometry at the carbonyl carbons in the reactant structures and using "R3" instead of "H". Category:Asinger reaction seems to have other examples using a ketone ("R3" group, rather than aldehyde) that are in-use in various *.wp articles on this subject. DMacks (talk) 21:47, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:07, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a photoshopped joke image of unclear derivation. McGeddon (talk) 22:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:06, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubt about authorship of uploader due to watermark "Marcelino Aguilar" in the left lower corner. -- Túrelio (talk) 22:45, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:04, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:04, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original image of unknown copyright status can be found at http://instidy.com/jaketaustin/p/1042772551573670769_289766249 Takeaway (talk) 23:12, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:04, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork Takeaway (talk) 23:14, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork. Out of scope. Takeaway (talk) 23:15, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo above threshold of originality, own work unlikely Basvb (talk) 23:22, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in France. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:32, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This is not an artwork, it's an industrial device. The FOP is irrelevant. M0tty (talk) 10:24, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of small size and poor quality. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:50, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:50, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of extremely small size and poor quality. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:51, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:50, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text logo which appears to be promotional or self-promotional in nature, check the name of the uploader & the name of the author. Commons isn't a place to promote yourself. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:51, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:50, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:07, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:52, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:47, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:53, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roberto34carlos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Nonsense upload, see nonsense description and nonsense category. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:53, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 07:08, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:54, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 07:08, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:54, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 07:16, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:54, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:07, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:56, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality nonsense image, see nonsense description. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:37, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope, test / vandalic George Chernilevsky talk 11:57, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:06, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:59, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vanity photos/COM:PENIS

Guanaco (talk) 21:12, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:40, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eric tir (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 09:19, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 12:00, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:27, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 12:01, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this portrait of encyclopedic value? Hansmuller (talk) 10:59, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 12:02, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused image Bazj (talk) 11:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 12:02, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE: Unused self-portait. Mys_721tx (talk) 11:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 12:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:37, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 12:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused low quality icon: out of scope Basvb (talk) 14:03, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 12:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:10, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 12:04, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SophieTurner-GwendolineChristie-KitHarington@ElleStyleAwards.jpg

[edit]

Original uploader on Flickr is not the author of this image (see source). Also affects the cropped versions.

Dudek1337 (talk) 20:32, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 04:36, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dikson (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyvio - photo shoots of Sony Music or uploads from untrusted Flickr users

Trijnsteltalk 11:52, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I'm not convinced that Sony Sweden has the authority to post the images using the stated license. As I pointed out at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Britneyspearspress.jpg, among other things found at the website under this license is Britney Spears' Womanizer video. See here. Tabercil (talk) 06:21, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination --Krd 13:27, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photos, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 11:53, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:28, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tatasky0012 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 12:41, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:28, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:29, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jaroeventbooking (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent (multiple) EXIF and different photographers involved. Files like File:ELITE MODEL LOOK.jpeg previously published via (example) http://www.jaroevent.com/project/13-michaela-gemrotova-sopran = http://www.jaroevent.com/userfiles/projects/13/227.JPG (last modified: 11.2015, identical exif)

Gunnex (talk) 15:25, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:30, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jualve (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:25, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 18:51, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:50, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Completely out of focus. Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:55, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 16:38, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:38, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 18:19, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Krd 13:30, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jualve (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:51, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Yann (talk) 13:16, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jualve (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 16:49, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per nom. --P 1 9 9   15:13, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jualve (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A series of toy cars, please see COM:TOYS. The cars were not created by the uploader, so cannot be licensed by them for Commons.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:32, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per nom. --P 1 9 9   15:13, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jualve (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 16:22, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Jualve (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 16:26, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per nom. --P 1 9 9   17:15, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:34, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:34, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:34, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jine.gloriya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:35, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:35, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:35, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:35, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:35, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SHINKONGtaiwan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:35, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Enzo Bhigazzi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 17:34, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:36, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of no apparent educational utility, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:17, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:38, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FaucetSingapore (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertising uploads, out of COM:SCOPE.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:18, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Krd 13:38, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

text only file, if this were ever needed, it could just be typed into the project. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:26, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:38, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as unused personal image with gibberish filename Rodhullandemu (talk) 22:41, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:38, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates! Ras67 (talk) 23:44, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:37, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates! Ras67 (talk) 23:45, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:37, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates! Ras67 (talk) 23:46, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:37, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates! Ras67 (talk) 23:47, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:37, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates! Ras67 (talk) 23:47, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:37, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates! Ras67 (talk) 23:48, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:37, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates! Ras67 (talk) 23:48, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:37, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates! Ras67 (talk) 23:51, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:37, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates! Ras67 (talk) 23:51, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:37, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates! Ras67 (talk) 23:51, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:37, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rahul Baisla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 10:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: one in use --Krd 15:39, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie of banned user, out of scope. Taivo (talk) 17:48, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:37, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified meal; see COM:EDUSE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:56, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:37, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aris massouridis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Toni Schönecker died 1979, so his works are not in the public domain yet.

Martin K. (talk) 18:00, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:37, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is out of scope, Commons is not a place to post unsourced photos used for holiday cards. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:36, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, could be replicated in text. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:12, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:36, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently promotional upload, notice created (red) category, etc. No educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:19, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:35, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently promotional upload, uncatagorized and unused. No educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:19, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:35, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising upload, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:23, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:35, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Identity photo , not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:25, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:35, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ou of scope. Yann (talk) 21:34, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:34, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nie wypełniłem wszystkich danych odnośnie autorstwa. plik jest niewidoczny w google grafika Wiztom (talk) 22:01, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

nie wypełniłem wszystkich danych odnośnie autorstwa. plik jest niewidoczny w google grafika Wiztom (talk) 20:16, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Krd 15:34, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete Requested on #wikipedia-en-help LorTalk 04:43, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: sorry, isn't a valid reason Alan (talk) 15:18, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a derivative of a plaque. We don't have any information regarding com:FOP in the Solomon Islands but they where part of the UK ultil 1978 so their copyright law is probably similar and there is no FOP in the UK for 2D graphic works and text according our FOP-page which makes this file a derivative of non free content.

Also, the uploader asked for deletion within seven days after he/she uploaded it which meets reason G7 of our speedy deletion policy.

This file should be deleted per com:PCP. Natuur12 (talk) 22:25, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion --Krd 15:33, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i created this and i want to delete it Mikey641 (talk) 23:13, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

can you please delete it?!?!?!?--Mikey641 (talk) 21:23, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:32, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This film was produced and released in 1979, and this relevant image was not PD in Italy on 1996-01-01, so had its copyright extended in the US per the URAA. Please do not upload photos or film frames shot after 1975. Cavarrone (talk) 23:27, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:32, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These files were uploaded accidentally by a script that appears to have been run twice. Every single file is an exact duplicate (a few have insignificant crops that do not substantially affect the image) of another file in Category:Boston Transit Commission; note the (2) at the end of each filename. There is no reason to keep a bunch of duplicates around; many more of the original set are properly categorized than of the duplicates.

Note: I don't have the ability to automatically add the deletion link to every file; I have added it to the category and notified the uploader. If anyone has AWB, please feel free to add the links. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:14, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:30, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo = own work; diploma is not. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:20, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:47, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is own work, but the diploma is not, COM:COPYVIO without more information. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:22, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:48, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Toy shown is not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:31, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:48, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The toys depicted are not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:32, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:48, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in France, this is a store interior with IKEA items. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: NOthing here has a copyright, but it's a terrible photo, not useful. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:49, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of photograph on label of bottle packaging, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:34, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: .\ .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:49, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Begawan muda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There is no indication that any of these uploads were created by uploader. Variable sizes, qualities, whitebalances, little to no camera data, etc. all combine to suggest that this is a group of internet culls, not own work. At least one has overprinting.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:41, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:55, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incompatible license with Commons at source : "http://www.eoas.info/objects/D00036.htm" http://www.eoas.info/objects/D00036.htm. There is no indication of publication date in the U.S. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:44, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Subject was Australian, died 1926. Since this must have been taken before 1/1/1955, it is {{PD-Australia}}. The NC license is copyfraud. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:01, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These images appear to be old enough for some perhaps to be retained, however the "own work" claim and self-licenses cannot be correct.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:55, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"historic photo" does not equal own work, more information about the image is required. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:57, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this historic photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ekomgmbh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional uploads, all copied from a single catalog at EPAL.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:04, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inclusion of copyrighted elements (statue of guy with fish, that moose-chandelier thing) may be past de minimis. Hop on Bananas (talk) 03:37, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


The focus of this image is clearly the entrance. Seeing as the candelier and the statue are right in front of it, it'd be pretty hard to have a photography without them. For comparison, COM:DM#Guidelines notes that "Copyrighted work X is identifiable, but is a small part of a larger work, so that the larger work cannot easily be shown without showing X." is "Very likely" to meet de minimis.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:39, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, I have no objections to keeping this. Hop on Bananas (talk) 20:38, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: De minimis requires that the copuyrighted item could be removed from the image without most readers noticing it. The statue is clearly central to this image. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:07, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this person served during the Korean War, his is not notable per WikiMedia criteria. Srich32977 (talk) 03:45, 19 December 2015 (UTC). Also, the contributor mis-identified the picture as "his/her own work" but the photo of this person was not created by his unborn grandchild. 03:48, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:07, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is copyrighted by Alan Keohane (see EXIF) Macucal (talk) 06:00, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It also infringes on the architect's copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:08, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense upload of a seemingly copyrighted image. See nonsense description. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:44, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:09, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mvd rf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, mysterious watermarks. May be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 08:20, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:10, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion, not educationally useful, missing legal information AxeEffect (talk) 09:21, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:13, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Motopark as no permission (No permission since) Apparently a work of the US Federal Government, but too pixelated. Amitie 10g (talk) 09:50, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: See User talk:Wpmint. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work; this has been copied from the Star Wars films as such needs a claim of Fair Use which can not be made on commons. It needs to be moved to projects that allow for fair use. 1.136.96.122 10:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:20, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:20, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:35, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:20, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:20, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused variation of File:Simone de Gale ARB RIBA1.jpg Bazj (talk) 11:20, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted both -- they appear on the web with an explicit (c) and EXIF shows photographer as Marek Sikora, who does not appear to be the uploader. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:27, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Urbansmash (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused images covering the same event as images uploaded by the same user

Bazj (talk) 11:34, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My images are being used in forthcoming articles which are currently being written.

Urbansmash (talk) 08:33, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: for various reasons:

  • I presume by "unused" you are referring to use on Wikimedia wikis? there is no requirement that files uploaded to commons must be used on a Wikimedia wiki
  • the images cover separate, easily distinguished subjects (involved in two events), so they are not trivially equivalent to each other. I would accept that (for example) a picture of every contestant in every round of the final, or in every heat of the competition, would be too much, as would dozens of photos of the same person in slightly different poses, but that is not the case here
  • the images present a reasonable visual record of the events and aspects such as costume styles for the various rounds, a picture of each key person, pictures of each winner and several finalists and groups in different contexts and one so far of a winner performing her role during the following year. This seems perfectly reasonable to me
  • I will want to create a derivative work of at least one of the images for better presentation in an English Wikipedia article, but I won't have time just at present

--Mirokado (talk) 22:59, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We prefer to have multiple images of the same subject or event. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:28, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality out of focus piece of artwork. Out of scope Timtrent (talk) 11:44, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:29, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inconsistent copyright status: tagged with GFDL licence, but with the mention "private use ONLY", which isn't allowed under Commons terms. Also misleading, as it's not the actual logo of the French Republic (see fr:Logo de la République française (1999).svg nor any previous official logo as far as I know off. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 12:32, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:29, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Either a copyrighted album cover or a self-promotional image and therefore not realistically useful for an educational purpose and out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:00, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:29, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio from page http://www.lucifer666art.com/2015/07/lucifersigil12-2.html need OTRS-permission but uploader removed request Motopark (talk) 13:21, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In web-page will be read posted by Matthew Lockey, need OTRS.--Motopark (talk) 13:46, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I own and created that artwork; notice the direct link to my website www.lucifer666art.com I already gave myself permission to upload that artwork; I created that artwork; I own that artwork. After the last 3 days or so of being a new user I have come to find that Wikipedia and Wikimedia commons are hostile environments which assertion of control and intimidation are most important in maintaining a conformist view of controlling what is posted or shared on these sites. I'm still learning how to use both sites thanks for your understanding. Lucifer666art (talk) 14:14, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: There are several problems here: The image appears elsewhere on the Web without a free license. This image is relatively small. Identity theft is fairly common here. both by fans and by vandals, and we have no way of knowing that User:Lucifer666art is actually connected with the source web site. In order to protect the copyright owner, policy therefore requires that the owner of the copyright provide a free license using OTRS.

It is also not clear that this image is in scope. We do not keep personal art from non-notable artists. Having a web site does not make an artist notable -- that generally requires significant independent reviews, showings in galleries or museums, or a WP article. Therefore, even with OTRS permission, I don't think this image should be restored.

I do not think that "hostile environments which assertion of control and intimidation are most important in maintaining a conformist view of controlling what is posted or shared on these sites" is correct. It is certainly true that we work hard to protect copyrights from anonymous uploaders by using OTRS. It is also true that we do not accept work from just anyone -- Commons is not Facebook or Flickr -- we do require that art work kept here be from notable artists. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:41, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shamaev (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Scans of old (not PD-old) photography, needs evidence of authorship/permission

A.Savin 14:30, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:42, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan of photo from 1950s years, needs evidence of authorship/permission A.Savin 14:41, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:43, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Basketball3x3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF.

Gunnex (talk) 14:48, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:43, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This text dokument is linked by https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Markus_%28Minkelfeld%29 Beitrag von Nobbi19 I think it is important to archive this document because the correct year of the first notation is now discribed understandable. The result of this research is in contrast to previously known time. The annual analysis in the beginning of this document is too large, as that could represent it in the wikipedia article. Nobbi19


Deleted: As Eugene says -- if the text belongs in an article, then enter it there. Also, it is not clear that the uploader is the author. If he is not, then this is a copyvio. If he is, then it is the work of a non-notable person. Either way, we cannot keep it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:46, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

Il s'agit d'un document prouvant ce qui est affirmé dans la page https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuel_Abramowicz, à mon sujet.

Georges-Pierre Tonnelier (talk) 15:35, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:46, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted sign A.Savin 15:38, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:49, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:49, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of map. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:49, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photos and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eugene, Thank you for reviewing my submission. My uncle David Haney was the first person to compile information on our family history of the Haney School Furniture company. He wrote a report for his college history class in 1973 on a typewriter. He asked me if I would put that in an electronic format and add the photographs from our collection of family photographs and documents because I am the default family historian after all these years.

All of the photographs are in our family estate (i.e. passed down to me). Logos and the like are in this same collection. Early (1895) maps are in the public domain and were chosen because they were current at the time of the founding of the company in the 1880's. Correspondence is owned by the family estate (me again). Patent information is public information if my knowledge serves me right. Flyers and brochures were developed by the Haney ancestors. Sketches and/or images of school desks are from flyers made by Haney School Furniture company owners and employees for company use. Nearly all other references such as newspaper articles are credited in the endnotes at the back of the document.

I could easily remove any particular offending items and would welcome any specific focus as this is my first time trying to enter anything into WIKIPEDIA. I thank you again in advance for any help you might give me in making this obscure aspect of history available to the world.

Sincerely, Thomas Haney — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wan2fly (talk • contribs) 17:14, 19 December 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: There are several problems here. First, it is clear that while the uploader has claimed "own work", none of it is, in fact, his own work. The text is the work of his uncle and the various images are the work of their photographers and artists. Although the images come from family records, the copyrights almost certainly belong to the photographers and artists and, if unpublished so far, will be under copyright for many years. Also, this document looks very much like a WP:EN article. If the company is sufficiently notable and the copyrights can be licensed properly, the work could be put on WP:EN as an article, using Wiki markup, not as a pdf. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:04, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cimax (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status (lowres, no metadata, uploader's copyvio history).

   FDMS  4    16:22, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:34, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 17:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 17:47, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bishop Andy Roberts (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, uncertain copyright. Also unused personal images, out of scope.

Yann (talk) 18:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:06, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:32, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:32, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:06, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Yann (talk) 18:45, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:06, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted photo SanAnMan (talk) 19:21, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-FLGov}} ? Yann (talk) 13:44, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: As Yann says, it might be {{PD-FLGov}} if it was taken by an employee of the city, but that would have to be proven. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:08, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ali244352 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 19:23, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:08, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not own work. Just scan ShinePhantom (talk) 19:32, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:09, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The bottom right caption is a hoax, this place is in Yoho Park in British Colombia. The claim of own work is dubious. The image is found on the internet with a website watermark, example: [3]. Many other files from the uploader were deleted for copyvios. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:48, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:09, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AV Journalism (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doodle art claimed to be posters, but without author. Only one is in use, but without clear copyright, even that one cannot be retained.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:12, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:10, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Horrible quality, unused image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:22, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This is personal art of a non-notable artist .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:16, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-simple logo and likely not own work either. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:08, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:30, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this overprocessed image of Roman Polanski, likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:27, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Português: Paz e bem! Peço desculpas por não indicar a fonte. Já fiz a devida correção no arquivo e provém de imagem da Wikimidia Commons.Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 21:22, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Personal art from a non-notable artist .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:17, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Horrible quality overprocessed image with no indication of user's own work, more likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:27, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Português: Paz e bem! Peço desculpas por não indicar a fonte. Já fiz a devida correção no arquivo e provém de imagem da Wikimidia Commons.
Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 21:26, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Personal art from a non-notable artist .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Horrible quality overprocessed image with no indication of user's own work, more likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:27, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Português: Paz e bem! Peço desculpas por não indicar a fonte. Já fiz a devida correção no arquivo e provém de imagem da Wikimidia Commons. Quanto à avaliação estética, discordo do proponente da eliminação.
Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 21:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Personal art from a non-notable artist .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Horrible quality overprocessed image with no indication of user's own work, more likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Horrible quality overprocessed image with no indication of user's own work, more likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Horrible quality overprocessed image with no indication of user's own work, more likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Horrible quality overprocessed image with no indication of user's own work, more likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no reason to keep this terrible quality overprocessed image when Commons already holds the original. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no reason to retain a poor quality, overprocessed image when Commons already holds the original. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Horrible quality overprocessed image with no indication of user's own work, more likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Horrible quality overprocessed image with no indication of user's own work, more likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:30, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Horrible quality overprocessed image with no indication of user's own work, more likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:30, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • If your'e applyng your quality rationale to raster images rather than SVGs, no valid reason for deletion. Lennin died in 1924 and most of his official photograhs (where this SVG is based likely) are already in the PD. --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:27, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Horrible quality overprocessed image with no indication of user's own work, more likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:31, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doodle art, likely Derivative work of unacknowledged image. Out of Scope, and possibly COM:COPYVIO as well. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:31, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Português: Paz e bem! Peço desculpas, acabo de identificar a imagem de origem e provém da própria Wikimidia Commons. Isto posto não me parece adequada a eliminação. Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 20:46, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Personal art from a non-notable artist, copyvio .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:19, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Horrible quality overprocessed image with no indication of user's own work, more likely COM:COPYVIO, aslo File:Berdaq.jpg same image in green. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:31, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:19, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Terrible quality over-processed image with no indication of user's own work, more likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:19, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Terrible quality over-processed image with no indication of user's own work, more likely COM:COPYVIO. Image is of statue in nation with no FOP, hence Derivative Works of said statue will also be copyvio. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:34, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal art from a non-notable artist , also copyvio of sculptor's copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:21, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused cartoon image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: license laundering? .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:24, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of artworks on display, not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:24, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Overprocessed images of famous men of various decades in history. Not own work, unused, poor quality images, are out of COM:SCOPE.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:41, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: First, these files are not images, but SVG, and several of them belongs to logos rather than persons. SVG ilustrations of well-known old portraits may be useful, and as SVG illustrations, Own work could apply. --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:03, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Personal art from a non-notable artist. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:28, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

Personal art, not used, out of scope. I am very sympathetic to these ideas, but these files are better suited for Facebook, or other social medias. There may be more.

Yann (talk) 12:03, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Namely:
-- Tuválkin 12:19, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination but kept the once mentioned by Tuvalkin. --Natuur12 (talk) 01:51, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk · contribs) 3

[edit]

No FOP in France, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pierre & Marie Curie graffiti.jpg for zoomed out version's deletion

Elisfkc (talk) 18:15, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:05, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk · contribs) 4

[edit]

Obvious derivative work. Is it covered by freedom of panorama? Justify, please

Discasto talk 14:58, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This could be covered by COM:FOP#Brazil but multiple things need to be clarified: Where was this photographed? Is this in a public place? Is this artwork permanently exhibited at that location or is this just a temporary exhibit. And finally and most importantly Brazil law requires the artist to be identified. All this has be to be documented in the file descriptions. In the current state we cannot keep these images. --AFBorchert (talk) 15:35, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion and PRP. No further information to confirm copyright status was forthcoming. Undeletion possible if status is clarified at later date. --Nick (talk) 20:44, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this monument in Italy was indeed photographed by a Flickr photographer and passed Flickr review, there is insufficient information to know if it would also pass COM:FOP, as in Italy there is none, also derivative images:


Deleted: Personal art from a non-notable artist. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:29, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'photographed by me' and 'previously published...' and p.e. missing exif, as well as media not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 02:20, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Looks OK to me. Same name on Commons, watermark and FB. Yann (talk) 20:32, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For all intents and purposes, a smaller duplicate of File:Commuters, who have just come off the train 1a33849v.jpg. Natuur12 declined speedy deletion as a simple duplicate; it's a mildly different crop but I believe that doesn't affect the content of the photograph or potential uses; the backing in the original is of no historical significance. Both images are from the exact same source. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:46, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Black borders cropped, useful. Yann (talk) 20:33, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense upload of a seemingly copyrighted drawing. See nonsense description and nonsense category. Ies (talk) 06:41, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:34, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Protegido por copyright: logo que no es sencillo como se declara, vea Commons:Sobre las licencias y Commons:Umbral de originalidad Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:51, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:12, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File deleted on 8 December 2015 per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logomsr.jp Macucal (talk) 06:44, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 20:35, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded SVG version File:Movimiento Social Republicano - Logo (Spain, 2013-2018).png Bruce The Deus (talk) 14:56, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's a png version, but netherless it's a version with better quality and the jpg version isn't necessary anymore. I support the deletion request. Welkend (talk) 14:25, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. This time the image is redundant and not in use on the project. So can be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferion duplicate of File:UA GAI Emblem.jpg. Kwasura (talk) 10:22, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:38, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Vio Dr-Taher (talk) 11:01, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:40, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused variation of File:Simone de Gale ARB RIBA1.jpg Bazj (talk) 11:20, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Simone de Gale ARB RIBA.jpg. Yann (talk) 20:41, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work since this appears to be culled from somewhere else. Commons:OTRS process is required for this to remain here Timtrent (talk) 11:51, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: http://www.perfectgame.org/Players/PlayerProfile.aspx?ID=340373 Yann (talk) 20:42, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User is NOT the copyright holder; is a continued sock-puppet account that has been blocked from Wikipedia since December 2014. See here. Livelikemusic (talk) 14:22, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:43, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User is not the copyright holder; they are an extreme sock-puppet. See here Livelikemusic (talk) 14:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:44, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality nonsense image uploaded to vandalize in en:Joachim Rønneberg. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:45, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:44, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

upload Problem Goesseln (talk) 15:45, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

keep, because at first I couldn't see the uploaded picture, now it seems ok. Sorry. --Goesseln (talk) 16:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 20:44, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:09, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:45, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of copyrighted content, without permission czar 17:03, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's partially obscured, and also shows the phone and the hand. I think a case can be made for de minimis here. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 20:53, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:46, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All other uploads of the user were copyright violations and this makes me suspect copyvio here also. The file is not big and has no metadata, own work is dubious, the uploader is banned. Taivo (talk) 17:12, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:46, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, DR started as montage missing links to media used from Wikimedia Common, as well as not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:05, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:47, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If File:Meditation by Victor Tongdee.jpg's metadata is correct, the image is by Victor Tongdee as given here as co author... the only problem is Mr. Tongdee is not the uploader and we don't seem to have permission from him to host his unused image here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:17, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is from Flickr, where it has a free license. Not sure if it is in scope through. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:54, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Source is File:Meditation by Victor Tongdee.jpg, which was reviewed. Yann (talk) 20:49, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If File:Meditation by Victor Tongdee.jpg's metadata is correct, the image is by Victor Tongdee as given here as co author... the only problem is Mr. Tongdee is not the uploader and we don't seem to have permission from him to host his unused image here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:17, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Source is File:Meditation by Victor Tongdee.jpg, which was reviewed. Yann (talk) 20:50, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If File:Meditation by Victor Tongdee.jpg's metadata is correct, the image is by Victor Tongdee as given here as co author... the only problem is Mr. Tongdee is not the uploader and we don't seem to have permission from him to host his unused image here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:17, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Source is File:Meditation by Victor Tongdee.jpg, which was reviewed. Yann (talk) 20:50, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused cartoon image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:38, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 20:52, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused cartoon image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:38, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 20:52, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private Gmail correspondence, out of COM:SCOPE. The proper way to get permission from a third party for an image on Commons is via the COM:OTRS system. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:06, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, but I was add this pdf for an evidence to prove the permission of www.indiancinemagallery.com to upload File:Abhirami - Abhirami at Meiyyazhagi Movie Special Show.jpg . NAVEEN C.M' Talk


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:54, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission, getting a gmail from someone and uploading the image is not COM:OTRS permission, this image was not taken by uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:07, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The permission should come from indiancinemagallery.com, not from a gmail address. Yann (talk) 20:57, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative Images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:08, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:59, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, no indication of user's own work on this poster of identity photos. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:15, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:59, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work of this image of a boy. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:16, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:59, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional upload for a chamber of commerce including their www address, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:20, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:00, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-simple logo without any source, possibly COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:21, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:00, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Colorized version of image from http://www.carolynmariemusic.com/media/, without attribution. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:01, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Company logo. No evidence that this is uploader's own work or that he is the copyright holder. Adam9007 (talk) 01:17, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 21:21, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 14:05, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request, unused Ymblanter (talk) 21:24, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 14:05, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request, unused Ymblanter (talk) 21:24, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contemporary work, no FoP in Russia for sculptures A.Savin 15:46, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no FoP in Russia for modern sculptures Ymblanter (talk) 21:25, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 19:05, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 21:25, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Statue is not own work. More information is needed than "own work" for source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:21, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Subject died 1870, so the bust is almost certainly PD. Also, it is apparently on permanent display in Scotland and therefore is covered by the UK's very broad FOP. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:04, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image isn't self published work. There isn't a clear source Soulreaper (talk) 00:27, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:05, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res, unused personal image Rodhullandemu (talk) 02:54, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:05, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 08:18, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:05, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The label on the bottle is not own work of uploader Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:30, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Wappen ist das "falsche" Dupplikat dieses Wappens: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wappen_von_Abenberg.svg Gliwi (talk) 15:56, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use Krd 15:45, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed to be "Own Work" and released under a CC-SA-4.0 license - It is a scan from a 1945 newpaper so both the claim of "Own Work" and the license are incorrect. Nigel Ish (talk) 16:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:46, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused poster, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:46, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook size upload (look at file history), no indication of own work, no metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:04, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but it's simply my intention as author/fotographer to give 1.) only small file size and 2.) no metadata for common use. --WinfriedSchneider (talk) 21:37, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Additional: This file is exerpt of a videostill, therefore - regardless of my intent - it couldn't get higher resolution or metadata. --WinfriedSchneider (talk) 01:14, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: AGF .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:28, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sjaakpeppel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that uploader is creator of these variably sized images, most with no metadata, and no repeating camera data. More likely to be internet culls.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I looked for several of them with Google with no hits. Maybe they're OK. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:54, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Jim --Krd 17:22, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PGIATHUY (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 08:42, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Quality is really bad, but all the files are used. Taivo (talk) 16:16, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use Krd 17:21, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Md. Alamgir Kabir Sohel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The picture of the call centre is obviously culled from a brochure. The picture of the gentleman is taken by the hand of another, so the copyright is owned by another, the Commons:OTRS release would allow this to remain once received . The logo is, in my view, more than a simple text device and is out of scope for Commons

Timtrent (talk) 09:13, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, except the logo which is below TOO Krd 17:23, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred photograph of the Camarim do Patriarca, similar and identical to others in the same category taken by the same photograph. Doesn't add anything of value to the project. Darwin Ahoy! 09:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:24, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: out of COM:SCOPE, unusable due to bad quality, out of focus. Quality is really bad, but the photo is still used in vi.wiki. Taivo (talk) 16:35, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use Krd 17:24, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: out of COM:SCOPE, out of focus. That's true, but the file is still used in vi.wiki. Taivo (talk) 16:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use Krd 17:24, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Karte zeigt keine Casinos sondern die Grossregionen der Schweiz. Author ist nicht Jay aka Jay sondern die Karte ist eine Kopie einer von mir erstellten Karte Tschubby (talk) 20:35, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:25, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior duplicate of File:47-й полк спеціального призначення ВВ МВС України.jpg. Kwasura (talk) 01:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Both images aren't really good. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:04, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. format and missing exif, as well as media not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 02:08, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:06, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Прапор внутрішніх військ МВС України.png. Kwasura (talk) 07:44, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:07, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior duplicate of File:40-а аеромобільна бригада.png. Kwasura (talk) 09:30, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:07, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nearly dulicate of File:Coat of arms of the Diocese of Libmanan.svg Pippobuono (talk) 09:47, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:08, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence is given in the file description of the research required to comply with UK law (see the "If you wish to rely on it..." element of the license) Hchc2009 (talk) 12:17, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:08, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no source/information why photographer Helmut Newton should have published this under CC. I strongly doubt that he did so. User Designedge has not been editing since 2011... didn't try to contact him/her. Tomukas (talk) 20:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:09, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of no apparent educational use. Neither flickr account is active. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:14, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I am sure I have seen this one on the web but I doubt it is in scope anyways Natuur12 (talk) 20:01, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is not author, no OTRS. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:03, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! There's a little problem, I see: i wanted to contact the original uploader, but he's no longer activ since 5 years. Also the original file was deleted after upload it (as improved version) on commons by me, as you can see at the file summary. So what shall I do?? Please help me, thanks. --WinfriedSchneider (talk) 08:29, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
One problem is less: Here's once again the original upload in de:WP in 2010. --WinfriedSchneider (talk) 22:47, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I see no reason to believe this image is a copyright violation. Clearly the work of an amateur photographer and likely someone close to the subject. Natuur12 (talk) 20:02, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marie Artemoff (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Some of the files are derivatives of works from a painter (dd 1965), the uploader is possibly related and in a position to provide permission. Please provide permission to use these files using Commons:OTRS, the other images are of such age that they are unlikely own work as claimed.

Basvb (talk) 23:37, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Artworks by artist who has not been deceased 70 years, one is a repro. from a book. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:41, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


I have asked at the French-speaking Bistro for someone to help this uploader with the required permissions. On her :fr talkpage the uploader claims that she is the daughter of Georges Artemoff, whereby she might have inherited the rights. --Túrelio (talk) 17:35, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
thank you Turelio, hopefully that will work. Basvb (talk) 11:41, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment She is probably his daughter and heir, but because we have so many fans and others making false claims, such a claim must be verified by OTRS. Without that, these must be deleted. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:33, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the photographs from the family archive because it is very unlikely that we can actually get free licenses from photographers from 50 years ago. If Marie_Artemoff is the heir and has the right to freely license the paintings, it is time for her to do so -- this cannot remain open much longer. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:07, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I'm now closing this as deleted as yet another week has passed seemingly without any changes in circumstances or contact with OTRS. Should OTRS permission be obtained, please nominate the files for undeletion at COM:UDEL citing the relevant ticket number. Thanks, odder (talk) 20:49, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is practically the same situation as with Commons:Deletion requests/File:Earl Lloyd George of Dwyfor COA.gif which was closed without addressing the copyright concerns. This image of the Duke of Newcastle's arms was taken from a website that attributes it to a 1954 publication from the UK. So there are two possibilities: either the image is out of copyright because it is a faithful copy of an older design and/or as Mabelina claims it is out of copyright because the rightful bearer is no longer alive (which I would still like to contest). Or the image is in fact copyrighted and unfree because it was first published in the United Kingdom and not out of copyright in 1996 (COM:URAA) which makes it retroactively copyrighted in the US too. Anyway, there is no evidence that this was ever released under a CC-by-SA 4.0 licence. De728631 (talk) 15:45, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@De728631: I concur that this is indeed a somewhat similar situation to that of the Earl Lloyd-George COA, hence I have brought it forward for consideration by Wiki Commons. Whilst there are countless examples of coats of arms which also need review, please advise how Wiki Commons' COA policy works (since this image was previously accepted with the "1714" appendage - btw I believe the image to be flawed in many ways - so merely seek a greater understanding of policy).
Points of difference between the two cases include:
1. the Earl Lloyd-George of Dwyfor COA was an individual family shield, ie. unquartered, which suitably differenced can be used by members of his family;
2. this image, with or without "1714" appended, states "Duke of Newcastle" which immediately signifies that not only were these arms not borne by the Duke concerned, being a crude imitation / representation of the 1st Duke's arms, but that no one could ever have been entitled to bear such arms in this manner;
3. how does www.british-towns.net being superimposed upon the image affect matters?
For reference, www.nottingham.ac.uk provides a better representation of the Duke's arms & as a point of interest, the 1st Duke died in 1768 & the 10th and last Duke of Newcastle died in 1988. Which license tag should be applied in such situations?
Best M Mabelina (talk) 21:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
PS. for the avoidance of any doubt, this heraldic image would not be protected by the grantee's Letters Patent (under the laws of Arms in England and Wales)...
The representation of the arms whether it contains a scroll with a motto or the number of a year or a full arms with a crest and mantling is totally irrelevant for Commons. It could even differ from the original blazon and could still be kept under certain circumstances. The policy of Wikimedia Commons requires however that the individual image, ie as it was uploaded, is either out of copyright or has been released under a free licence by the current copyright holder. The watermark www.british-towns.net is undesirable in terms of quality and the but again it doesn't affect this situation either. What we need is proof that this drawing from the original 1954 book source is either not copyrighted or that the artist/book publisher/whoever holds the current copyright for this image (not the right to bear these arms) has granted a free licence for it. We've had this endless discussion before with the Earl Lloyd-George of Dwyfor arms and the workaround there was that I uploaded my own graphic rendition of those arms which made me the copyright holder of that particular rendition (at least under German and American law) and enabled me to release it under Creative Commons licence. You write that the image would not be protected by letters patent so it is even more just an "ordinary" drawing that is subject to copyright rules if it was drawn recently enough.
Concerning the use and wearing of these heraldic images by others, that is why we have the {{COA}} disclaimer that says essentially "do so at your own risk, we are simply hosting the file". [Though it can be freely represented, it cannot be appropriated, or used in such a way as to create a confusion with or a prejudice to its owner.] De728631 (talk) 21:54, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you De728631 & I believe we are in full agreement, so how to tidy the other heraldic images on Wiki Commons (a big job) & could Nottingham University's image be used & if so, how? Best M Mabelina (talk) 22:01, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, most heraldic pages here should have a correct licence or they are simply old enough to be out of copyright so I don't know which masses you are talking about. Do you have any examples? De728631 (talk) 22:12, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I'd boldly go ahead and close this as deleted as it appears to me that the file shows a 1954 interpretation of the coat of arms, which was originally created in the 18th century. With that said, however, it ought to be mentioned that should we be able to get an earlier (say, 1940s) version of the coat of arms, then that file might be kept as that interpretation would have entered the public domain by now. And now for the obligatory addition, if anyone feels this closure is wrong, then please do go ahead and nominate the file for undeletion at COM:UDEL citing relevant Commons policies and/or English law. Thanks, odder (talk) 20:44, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]